[Retrograde endopyelotomy using Holmium-Yag laser for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction]

[Update on ureteral reconstruction 2024]

Ureteral strictures can occur along the entire course of the ureter and have many different causes. Factors involved in the development include, among other things, congenital anomalies, iatrogenic injuries during endoscopic as well as open or minimally invasive visceral surgical, gynecological, and urological procedures as well as prior radiation therapy. Planning treatment for ureteral strictures requires a detailed assessment of stricture and patient characteristics. Given the various options for ureteral reconstruction, various methods must be considered for each patient. Short-segment proximal strictures and strictures at the pyeloureteral junction are typically surgically managed with Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. End-to-end anastomosis can be performed for short-segment proximal and middle ureteral strictures. Distal strictures are treated with ureteroneocystostomy and are often combined with a Boari and/or Psoas Hitch flap. Particularly, the treatment of long-segment strictures in the proximal and middle ureter remain a surgical challenge. The use of bowel interposition is an established treatment option for this, offering good functional results but also potential associated complications. Robot-assisted surgery is increasingly becoming a minimally invasive treatment alternative to reduce hospital stays and optimize postoperative recovery. However, open surgical ureteral reconstruction remains an established procedure, especially after multiple previous abdominal operations.

Evaluation of the results of laser endopyelotomy with two different technique in ureteropelvic junction obstruction

INTRODUCTION

Failed pyeloplasty procedures are caused by large amounts of scarring, and peripelvic fibrosis. This finding has been associated with urinary extravasations to the operation, urosepsis or an excessive tissue reaction. The treatment options for secondary UPJO (Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction) are the same with the options for primary procedures: in cases of very poor renal function, various pyeloplasty forms (open and laparoscopic), and ureterocalicostomy or sometimes nephrectomy may be considered in severe renal function loss. Whereas, endoscopic treatment can be considered in elective cases.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 46 young patients who underwent endopyelotomy due to secondary ureteropelvic obstruction between January 2013 and September 2018 were included in the study. Patients underwent semirigid URS (Ureterorenoscopy) guided laser endopyelotomy until July 2015, and the patients had flexible URS guided laser endopyelotomy since July 2015.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was found as 17.7 ± 4.2 and 16.9 ± 5.7 years in the SURSLE (Semirigid Ureterorenoscopy Laser Endopyelotomy), and FURSLE (Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Laser Endopyelotomy) groups, respectively. Success of the procedure was confirmed in 20 (83%) patients in the SURSLE group, and 19 (86%) patients in the FURSLE group who had no obstructive symptoms based on USG, GFR and excretion curves on the renogram ordered in the 24th month. Four (16%) patients in the SURSLE group, and 3 (14%) patients in the FURSLE group were accepted as failed, their treatments were arranged for additional surgical procedures, and these patients were taken under the follow-up protocol.

DISCUSSION

This is one of the first studies comparing endopyelotomy with semirigid URS and flexible URS in patients with ureteropelvic stenosis. Long-term results with a large series of patients are not known, and our approach can be considered only as an individual method. There are different treatment options in UPJO. The use of fluoroscopy has advantages in endourologic operations. Therefore, lower radiation exposure can be a rational approach for protecting a person. Similarly, providing necessary protection also for physicians and operating room personnel is essential. In our study, shorter fluoroscopy time with SURSLE provided an advantage over FURSLE in terms of radiation exposure.

CONCLUSION

Of semirigid and flexible URS techniques that have no superiority over each other in terms of success, preferring semi-rigid URS guided laser endopyelotomy with lower ionizing radiation used, is more rational.

Laser endoureterotomy and endopyelotomy: an update

PURPOSE

Although minimally invasive approach is one of the first-line treatment choices for ureteral strictures, there are still controversies on the ideal method to treat this entity. The objective of this update was to define the level of evidence around endoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) and ureteral strictures.

METHODS

We reviewed the current available literature on the PubMed database from the last decade up to May 2014 on laser endoureterotomy and endopyelotomy.

RESULTS

The level of evidence for the endoscopic treatment of UPJ and ureteral strictures is low. Despite this, it appears that endoureterotomy and endopyelotomy performed mainly with Ho:YAG laser achieve good success rates with minimal perioperative morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser endoureterotomy and endopyelotomy should be considered a reasonable treatment option in selected patients.

[Anderson-Hynes open pyeloplasty: which indications in the area of laparoscopic surgery?]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the results of Anderson-Hynes open pyeloplasty in our institution. And then to compare them to those of laparoscopic procedure and identify what can be considered now as the indications of the open procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

It was a retrospective study on 30 cases of ureteropelvic junction syndrome managed by Anderson-Hynes open procedure. The clinical, biological and radiologic characteristics of the patients as well as the surgical technique and its results were taken into account. The patients were classified, according to Valdeyer and Cendron classification as type II in eight cases (26.7%), type III in ten cases (33.3%) and type IV in four cases (13.3%). There were also eight cases of giant hydronephrosis (26.7%). The operating time, the length of hospital stay and the outcomes were studied and compared with those of the laparoscopic pyeloplasty found in the medical literature.

RESULTS

The mean operating time was 115 ± 33.4 minutes (90-230 min). The mean length of hospital stay was 10.4 ± 5.1 days. Six patients (20%) had postoperative complications. After a mean follow-up of 28 ± 13.7 months (13-48 months), our first-hand success rate was 90% (n=27).

CONCLUSION

Anderson-Hynes open pyeloplasty reached good results but nowadays its indications can be limited to laparoscopic contraindications, severe hydronephrosis (grade IV or giant hydronephrosis) and second-hand cases. The two latter indications depend on the surgeon experience in laparoscopic surgery.