Circonstances de prescription de l’hormonothérapie chez des patients atteints de cancer de la prostate

[Antihormonal therapy of prostate cancer - treatment indication and cardiovascular risk profile - advantage for GnRH antagonists?]

INTRODUCTION

 Prostate cancer is the most common urological tumour disease in men. In the localized tumour stage in combination with radiotherapy and especially in advanced metastastic disease, classical androgen deprivation remains an essential therapy. During the last 10 years, our knowledge of the cardiovascular risk of this therapy has rapidly increased.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 This non-systematic review highlights the current data on cardiovascular risk in the use of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer.

RESULTS

 Essential publications about the cardiovascular risk of antihormonal therapy are summarised in detail. In particular, the current data on the potential cardiovascular benefit when using GnRH antagonists in androgen deprivation are discussed. The article further highlights the problem of today's antihormonal overtreatment, despite the lack of scientific evidence and points out that patient selection should be improved in the future.

CONCLUSION

 The multicentre prospective PRONOUNCE study has been designed to answer the question in more detail, as to whether GnRH antagonist therapy provides benefit with respect to the cardiovascular risk as compared to classical LHRH analogue androgen deprivation therapy.

[Not Available]

Les effets indésirables de l’hormonothérapie anti-androgénique (HAA) dans le traitement du cancer de la prostate sont attribuables à la carence d’androgènes. L’HAA entraîne le syndrome de castration, qui se caractérise par une diminution de la libido, la dysfonction érectile, l’asthénie, des bouffées de chaleur, la diminution des capacités intellectuelles et la dépression. Il en résulte également une augmentation de la graisse abdominale, ce qui favorise l’insulinorésistance et le diabète. La perte de la densité minérale osseuse secondaire à l’HAA entraîne un risque fracturaire accru. Il existe de plus un risque cardiovasculaire important dû aux facteurs métaboliques. L’effet thérapeutique de l’HAA doit donc être soupesé en regard de la toxicité liée à l’hypogonadisme.

Non-metastatic CRPC and asymptomatic metastatic CRPC: which treatment for which patient?

The introduction of early PSa-based diagnosis has profoundly impacted the epidemiology of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Many patients enter the disease at an early stage when the only sign of resistance to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a progressive elevation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). This created a very heterogeneous population of non-metastatic (M0) CRPC. PSa kinetics is the most powerful indicator of aggressiveness in that population and can be used to trigger imaging investigation and enrollment in clinical trials. Several registered and near to come treatments have not been tested in that population but in men with more advanced metastatic and often symptomatic disease. Several agents have been investigated to delay the onset of the first bone metastasis but only one, denosumab, has reached its end-point. Because CRPC remains largely driven by the androgen receptor (AR), physicians have relied on second-line hormonal manipulations to delay the progression of the disease, including first generation antiandrogens, adrenal synthesis inhibitors, steroids and estrogens. The data however are mostly limited to phase II trials.