Transplantation rénale et receveurs obèses : revue du comité de transplantation de l’Association française d’urologie

Renal transplantation outcomes in obese patients: a French cohort-based study

Background

Whilst there are a number of publications comparing the relationship between body mass index (BMI) of kidney transplant recipients and graft/patient survival, no study has assessed this for a French patient cohort.

Methods

In this study, cause-specific Cox models were used to study patient and graft survival and several other time-to-event measures. Logistic regressions were performed to study surgical complications at 30 days post-transplantation as well as delayed graft function.

Results

Among the 4691 included patients, 747 patients were considered obese with a BMI level greater than 30 kg/m². We observed a higher mortality for obese recipients (HR = 1.37, p = 0.0086) and higher risks of serious bacterial infections (HR = 1.24, p = 0.0006) and cardiac complications (HR = 1.45, p < 0.0001). We observed a trend towards death censored graft survival (HR = 1.22, p = 0.0666) and no significant increased risk of early surgical complications.

Conclusions

We showed that obesity increased the risk of death and serious bacterial infections and cardiac complications in obese French kidney transplant recipients. Further epidemiologic studies aiming to compare obese recipients versus obese candidates remaining on dialysis are needed to improve the guidelines for obese patient transplant allocation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-021-02278-1.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity in renal transplantation candidates: a matched case-control study

Obesity has become an important issue in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Since it is considered a relative contraindication for renal transplantation, bariatric surgery has been advocated to treat morbid obesity in transplant candidates, and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most reported procedure. However, comparative data regarding outcomes of LSG in patients with or without ESRD are scarce. Consecutive patients with ESRD (n = 29) undergoing LSG were compared with matched patients with normal renal function undergoing LSG in a 1:3 ratio using propensity score adjustment. Data were collected from a prospective database. Eligibility for transplantation was also studied. A lower weight loss (20 kg (16-30)) was observed in patients with ESRD within the first year as compared to matched patients (28 kg (21-34)) (P < 0.05). After a median follow-up of 30 (19-50) months in the ESRD group, contraindication due to morbid obesity was lifted in 20 patients. Twelve patients underwent transplantation. In patients with ESRD potentially eligible for transplantation, LSG allows similar weight loss in comparison with matched patients with normal renal function, enabling lifting contraindication for transplantation due to morbid obesity in the majority of patients within the first postoperative year.

Renal Transplant in Obese Patients and Impact of Weight Loss Before Surgery on Surgical and Medical Outcomes: A Single-Center Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have linked obesity to poor outcomes in renal transplant recipients, prompting many transplant centers to encourage weight loss pretransplant in obese patients. Here, we performed a single-center retrospective study to assess the effects of weight loss on graft and patient outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 893 renal transplant recipients at our center from 2007 to 2011 were analyzed. First, renal transplant recipients with a history of obesity before transplant (42%) were compared with nonobese patients. Second, in the obese group, renal transplant recipients with significant weight loss (> 10%) before transplant were compared with other obese renal transplant recipients without significant weight loss.

RESULTS

Renal transplant recipients were predominantly white, with 74% having undergone living-donor transplant. Obese patients were older (56.6 vs 46.7 y old) and had more comorbidities and more surgical complications, in particular wound complications and incisional hernias, posttransplant than nonobese patients (14.7 vs 5.5%, respectively). Patient and graft survival rates were similar to those in nonobese patients. In the obese group, patient characteristics and medical or surgical complications after transplant did not differ between those with or without significant weight loss. However, obese patient and graft survival rates were lower in patients with weight loss than in obese patients without weight loss.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, weight loss before transplant surgery in obese patients had no influence on surgical outcomes but was associated with a higher mortality rate. A prospective assessment of the impact of weight loss before surgery is needed to establish its usefulness.

[Is obesity a barrier to kidney transplantation?]

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplantation is the most suitable of ESRD care. The proportion of obese people is increasing in the general population and patients with kidney impairment. It is important to assess the impact of obesity on surgical complications of kidney transplantation. The aim of this retrospective study was to signify the correlation between obesity and the occurrence of postoperative urological complications during the first year.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study from March 1999 to December 2009. We conducted a chart review of patients undergoing kidney transplantation. The kidneys were taken from cadaveric donors. Data collected included age, weight, height, preoperative BMI; causal nephropathy, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, anticoagulation therapy. Intraoperative data included operative time (DO), cold ischemia. Urological complications were recorded during the first year after the kidney transplantation (vascular anastomotic strictures, ureterovesical stenosis, lymphorrheas, pyelonephritis, hematoma, wound infection). Statistical analysis consisted of a t-test for independent samples and univariate and multivariate logistic regression for the occurrence of complications.

RESULTS

Four hundred and twenty-two patients were transplanted in total. We excluded 20 patients. BMI and duration of surgery patients with complications were significantly different from those of patients with no complications (P=0.016 and P=0.039, respectively). Obese (n=48) had more diabetes (12.5% versus 3.7%, P=0.014), were more often smoking (35.4% versus 22%, P=0.012), had a longer DO (203.64minutes versus 182.46minutes, P=0.006), and complications (62.5% versus 50.28%, P=0.03) than patients with a BMI <30 (n=354). After adjusting for age, smoking, DO, diabetes and BMI showed that only BMI was an independent predictor of the occurrence of postoperative complications with P=0.048 and RR=1.058 [CI: 1 to 1.119]. However, there was no more transplantectomy obese (P=0.911).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that there is a significant risk of surgical complications after kidney transplantation in obese patients. But ultimately, this does not affect graft survival because there are no more transplantectomies or return to dialysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.

[The impact of obesity on renal function at one year after kidney transplantation: single-center experience]

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for ESRD. Several studies have investigated the factors that may affect kidney function at 1 year. The factors mentioned are anemia, hypercholesterolemia, immunosuppressors, etc. We studied the independent predictors of serum creatinine>100μmol/L at 1 year.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study from March 1999 to December 2009. We conducted a chart review of 402 kidney transplant patients. The kidneys were removed from cadaveric donors. Data collected included age, weight, height, preoperative BMI, the causal nephropathy, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, anticoagulation. Intraoperative data included operative time, and cold ischemia. Statistical analysis consisted of a t-test for independent samples comparing the group with a creatinine≤100μmol/L vs>100 group, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression for a serum creatinine>100μmol/L at 1 year and test of correlation between BMI and serum creatinine at 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

We found a significant difference in BMI and cold ischemia with P=0.008 and P=0.002, respectively. In contrast there was no difference in age, operative time and blood loss, P=0.758, P=0.941 and P=0.963, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression showed that donor age P=0.004 (HR: 1.016 and CI: 1.005-1.027), a recipient age P=0.023 (HR: 0.986 and CI: 0.974-0.998) and BMI P=0.001 (HR: 1.019 and CI: 1.010-1.028) were independent predictors of serum creatinine>100μmol/L at 1 year. The Pearson correlation coefficient r=0.154 (P=0.004) showed a significant correlation between BMI and serum creatinine.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that donor age, recipient age and BMI were independent predictors of renal function>100μmol/L at 1 year. Our results highlight the difficulty of the management of obesity in renal transplant patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.

Effects of obesity on kidney transplantation outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effects of obesity on outcomes reported after kidney transplantation have been controversial. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to elucidate this issue.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and gray literature were searched up to August 6, 2013. Studies that compared obese and nonobese patients who underwent kidney transplantation and evaluated one of these outcomes-delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection, graft or patient survival at 1 or 5 years after transplantation, or death by cardiovascular disease (CVD)-were included. Two independent reviewers extracted the data and assessed the quality of the studies.

RESULTS

From 1,973 articles retrieved, 21 studies (9,296 patients) were included. Obesity was associated with DGF (relative risk, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.57; I=8%; Pheterogeneity=0.36), but not with acute rejection. Graft loss and death were associated with obesity only in the analysis of studies that evaluated patients who received a kidney graft before year 2000. No association of obesity with graft loss and death was found in the analysis of studies that evaluated patients who received a kidney graft after year 2000. Death by CVD was associated with obesity (relative risk, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-3.64; I=0%; Pheterogeneity=0.59); however, most studies included in this analysis evaluated patients who received a kidney graft after year 2000.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, obese patients have increased risk for DGF. In the past years, obesity was a risk factor for graft loss, death by CVD, and all-cause mortality. However, for the obese transplanted patient today, the graft and patient survival is the same as that of the nonobese patient.