[Quantitative imaging in uro-oncology].
Prog Urol 2014;
24:399-413. [PMID:
24861679 DOI:
10.1016/j.purol.2014.02.008]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2013] [Revised: 02/21/2014] [Accepted: 02/28/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Imaging currently performed in uro-oncology could provide useful information. The use of all this information could help to better understand tumor growth and response to treatment. Therefore, it seems interesting to review the knowledge, to describe the main techniques currently available in many centers or in process and to clarify their results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted in the PubMed database to identify all imaging techniques performed for therapeutic evaluation in uro-oncology. The keywords used were: cancer, kidney, bladder, prostate, urology biomarkers, imaging, ultrasound, CT-scan, MRI, PET-CT, RECIST, BOLD, ASL, gold DWI Diffusion, contrast, F-miso. The first publications identified were analyzed to search unidentified studies by the selected keywords.
RESULTS
From simple to more complex morphology data from functional imaging (PET, MRI), data obtained from imaging helps to better understand tumor growth and response to treatment. Although optimizations are coming, all the techniques reported are available in many centers or going to be.
CONCLUSION
The imaging evaluation in onco-urology can bring a large amount of information. Integrating to research protocols is now essential to sustain this activity.
Collapse