[How to prevent LUTS due to BPH development and progression]

Comparison of surgical procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia of medium-volume prostates: evaluation of the causes of rehospitalization from the French National Hospital Database (PMSI-MCO)

PURPOSE

In France, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is still the most commonly used surgical treatment for medium sized benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but the Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and laser vaporization procedures are becoming more common. For these three surgical procedures, we evaluate the initial complications, the short term (3 months) and the 4-12-month postoperative complications necessitating re-hospitalization.

METHODS

From the French national hospital data base (PMSI-MCO), all hospitalizations for BPH treatment in 2018 were extracted. We document the complications during the initial hospitalization and any subsequent rehospitalizations during the one-year postoperative period.

RESULTS

In 2018, 67,220 patients were treated for BPH: 46,242 TURP, 13,509 HoLEP and 7469 laser vaporization. Age and anticoagulation medications were similar for men treated by the three procedures, but TURP patients were more often hypertensive. Infections and hemorrhagic complications were the most common complications at the initial hospitalization: 17%, 10%, 13% for infections and 15%, 8.1%, 11% for hemorrhagic complications respectively, and TURP performed worse than the other two procedures at the initial hospitalization. During the first three months and then the subsequent nine months, there were fewer complications than initially, with little difference between the three procedures, all differences being less than 1%.

CONCLUSION

Laser vaporization techniques led to fewer complications. However, the PMSI-MCO only registers complications during hospitalizations. This study should be extended to non-hospitalized, more minor complications.

The Etiology and Pathophysiology Genesis of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostate Cancer: A New Perspective

Background: The etiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer are unknown, with ageing being the greatness risk factor. Methods: This new perspective evaluates the available interdisciplinary evidence regarding prostate ageing in terms of the cell biology of regulation and homeostasis, which could explain the timeline of evolutionary cancer biology as degenerative, inflammatory and neoplasm progressions in these multifactorial and heterogeneous prostatic diseases. Results: This prostate ageing degeneration hypothesis encompasses the testosterone-vascular-inflamm-ageing triad, along with the cell biology regulation of amyloidosis and autophagy within an evolutionary tumorigenesis microenvironment. Conclusions: An understanding of these biological processes of prostate ageing can provide potential strategies for early prevention and could contribute to maintaining quality of life for the ageing individual along with substantial medical cost savings.

[Alpha-blockers or phytotherapy as first-line treatment of LUTS/BPH in general medicine: The PERSAT non-interventional study]

PURPOSE

The objective of the PERSAT study was to evaluate first-line treatment of BPH-associated LUTS in real-life conditions.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was conducted in France by general practitioners (GP) on patients with moderate to severe LUTS (IPSS ≥12). GPs freely decided to prescribe either an alpha-blocker (AB) or phytotherapeutic treatment (PT). The main criterion was the percentage of responding patients (decrease in total IPSS score ≥3) at 6 months.

RESULTS

Of the 849 patients included, 759 were analysed (381 treated with AB and 378 with PT); 718 were followed up at 6 months, 90% of which had no treatment modification. Their inclusion characteristics were similar between the AB and PT groups (mean IPSS: 18.6±4.5 and 17.8±4.1, respectively). Treatment response rates at 6 months were 94.2% [91.2%; 96.4%] in AB and 92.5% [89.2%; 95.1%] in PT. The IPSS decreased by 10.0±5.6 points, with no difference between groups. The proportion of patients bothered by their LUTS (IPSS-QoL ≥4) evolved from 88.5% to 6.5% at 6 months. The improvement of LUTS was perceived by more than 94% of patients (PGI-I) and doctors (CGI-I), 93% of patients were satisfied with the treatment at 6 months, regardless of the treatment initiated. The most reported adverse reactions were ejaculation disorder (3.9% for AB and 0.9% for PT).

CONCLUSION

PERSAT confirms in current practice the effectiveness of AB and PT treatments, recommended as first-line treatment in LUTS/BPH.

LEVEL OF PROOF

3.

Pathophysiology of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Benign Prostatic Enlargement: A Mini-Review

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) belong to the most frequent diseases in ageing men. Beyond the 6th decade of life, more than 30% of men suffer from moderate to severe LUTS requiring intervention. The pathophysiology of BPH/BPE is still incompletely understood. The dominant role of the androgen system and the androgen receptor is well defined. Androgen receptors are expressed in BPH tissue in which they are activated by the potent androgen dihydrotestosterone. Synthesis of dihydrotestosterone is under control of the 5α-reductase enzyme, activity of which is antagonized by finasteride and dutasteride. More recently, the impact of prostatic inflammation and metabolic parameters particularly for the development of BPE and LUTS has increasingly been recognized. A better understanding of the pathophysiology is a prerequisite for the development of novel, more effective medical treatment options.