Delayed pseudoprogression of a vestibular schwannoma postradiosurgery

Clinical practice guideline on the management of vestibular schwannoma

INTRODUCTION

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common tumour of the cerebellopontine angle. The greater accessibility to radiological tests has increased its diagnosis. Taking into account the characteristics of the tumour, the symptoms and the age of the patient, three therapeutic strategies have been proposed: observation, surgery or radiotherapy. Choosing the most appropriate for each patient is a frequent source of controversy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This paper includes an exhaustive literature review of issues related to VS that can serve as a clinical guide in the management of patients with these lesions. The presentation has been oriented in the form of questions that the clinician usually asks himself and the answers have been written and/or reviewed by a panel of national and international experts consulted by the Otology Commission of the SEORL-CCC.

RESULTS

A list has been compiled containing the 13 most controversial thematic blocks on the management of VS in the form of 50 questions, and answers to all of them have been sought through a systematic literature review (articles published on PubMed and Cochrane Library between 1992 and 2023 related to each thematic area). Thirty-three experts, led by the Otology Committee of SEORL-CCC, have analyzed and discussed all the answers. In Annex 1, 14 additional questions divided into 4 thematic areas can be found.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical practice guideline on the management of VS offers agreed answers to the most common questions that are asked about this tumour. The absence of sufficient prospective studies means that the levels of evidence on the subject are generally medium or low. This fact increases the interest of this type of clinical practice guidelines prepared by experts.

From the perspective of pseudo-progression rather than treatment failure, how long should we wait before considering treatment failure if large cystic enlargement occurs after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma?: insight into pseudoprogression based on two case reports

Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been accepted as a safe and effective treatment for vestibular schwannoma (VS). However, during follow-up, tumor expansion induced by irradiation can occur, and diagnosis of failure in radiosurgery for VS is still controversial. Tumor expansion with cystic enlargement causes some confusion regarding whether further treatment should be performed. We analyzed more than 10 years of clinical findings and imaging of patients with VS with cystic enlargement after GKRS. A 49-year-old male with hearing impairment was treated with GKRS (12 Gy; isodose, 50%) for a left VS with a preoperative tumor volume of 0.8 cc. The tumor size increased with cystic changes from the third year after GKRS, reaching a volume of 10.8 cc at 5 years after GKRS. At the 6th year of follow-up, the tumor volume started to decrease, up to 0.3 cc by the 14th year of follow-up. A 52-year-old female with hearing impairment and left facial numbness was treated with GKRS for a left VS (13 Gy; isodose, 50%). The preoperative tumor volume was 6.3 cc, which started to increase with cystic enlargement from the first year after GKRS, and reaching 18.2 cc by 5 years after GKRS. The tumor maintained a cystic pattern with slight changes in size, but no other neurologic symptoms developed during the follow-up period. After 6 years of GKRS, tumor regression was observed, eventually reaching a volume of 3.2 cc by the 13th year of follow-up. In both cases, persistent cystic enlargement in VS was observed at 5 years after GKRS, after which the tumors began to stabilize. After more than 10 years of GKRS, the tumor volume was less than that before GKRS. Enlargement with large cystic formation in the first 3-5 years after GKRS has been considered as treatment failure. However, our cases show that further treatment for cystic enlargement should be deferred for at least 10 years, especially in patients without neurological deterioration, as inadequate surgery can be prevented within that period.

The study of predictive factors for the evolution of vestibular schwannomas

PURPOSE

The primary objective was to determine whether the analysis of textural heterogeneity of vestibular schwannomas on MRI at diagnosis was predictive of their radiological evolutivity. The secondary objective was to determine whether some clinical or radiological factors could also be predictive of growth.

METHODS

We conducted a pilot, observational and retrospective study of patients with a vestibular schwannoma, initially monitored, between April 2001 and November 2019 within the Oto-Neurosurgical Institute of Champagne Ardenne, Texture analysis was performed on gadolinium injected T1 and CISS T2 MRI sequences and six parameters were extracted: mean greyscale intensity, standard deviation of the greyscale histogram distribution, entropy, mean positive pixels, skewness and kurtosis, which were analysed by the Lasso method, using statistically penalised Cox models. Extrameatal location, tumour necrosis, perceived hearing loss < 2 years with objectified tone audiometry asymmetry, tinnitus at diagnosis, were investigated by the Log-Rank test to obtain univariate survival analyses.

RESULTS

78 patients were included and divided into 2 groups: group A comprising 39 "stable patients", and B comprising the remaining 39 "progressive patients". Independent analysis of the texture factors did not predict the growth potential of vestibular schwannomas. Among the clinical or radiological signs of interest, hearing loss < 2 years was identified as a prognostic factor for tumour progression with a significant trend (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not identify an association between texture analysis and vestibular schwannomas growth. Decreased hearing in the 2 years prior to diagnosis appears to predict potential radiological progression.