An evaluation of a radiographer-led barium enema service in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer

A case study of the development of a videofluoroscopy service: Integration and collaboration between the speech & language therapy and radiographer teams

BACKGROUND

Videofluoroscopy (VFSS) is a dynamic fluoroscopic examination of swallowing function to assess oropharyngeal dysphagia. In the United Kingdom (UK), this test is typically performed by a team of Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs), radiologists and radiographers. While VFSS is undertaken across the UK, recent literature reflects wide variation in the procedure itself.

OBJECTIVES

The role of the advanced practitioner gastrointestinal (GI) radiographer within a VFSS service will be illustrated by the narrative description of a VFSS service in a large NHS teaching hospital in England. The paper compares the existing VFSS service against recent literature outlining national practice, with particular focus upon the growing role of the advanced practitioner GI radiographer. Existing pressures upon the National Health Service (NHS) are examined as contributing factors. Lastly, further plans to improve the clinic are delineated.

KEY FINDINGS

Recent literature shows a wide national variation in the running of VFSS services. Pertinently, the evidence suggests that radiologists are becoming progressively less involved in these clinics, with a move towards more practitioner-led services. The changes to the described VFSS service are in line with national trends, and the described clinic is an effective example of a practitioner-led service which fully utilises the role of the advanced practitioner GI radiographer.

CONCLUSION

This paper demonstrates that a practitioner-led service can benefit both patients and staff. Further improvement work is ongoing, with a particular need to involve service users and collect more meaningful outcome measures.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The growing move towards practitioner-led clinics is likely to continue. However, the wide variation in practice nationally and lack of consistent, recognised training that meets the needs of both SLT and radiographers, needs to be addressed.

Added value of double reading in diagnostic radiology,a systematic review

Objectives

Double reading in diagnostic radiology can find discrepancies in the original report, but a systematic program of double reading is resource consuming. There are conflicting opinions on the value of double reading. The purpose of the current study was to perform a systematic review on the value of double reading.

Methods

A systematic review was performed to find studies calculating the rate of misses and overcalls with the aim of establishing the added value of double reading by human observers.

Results

The literature search resulted in 1610 hits. After abstract and full-text reading, 46 articles were selected for analysis. The rate of discrepancy varied from 0.4 to 22% depending on study setting. Double reading by a sub-specialist, in general, led to high rates of changed reports.

Conclusions

The systematic review found rather low discrepancy rates. The benefit of double reading must be balanced by the considerable number of working hours a systematic double-reading scheme requires. A more profitable scheme might be to use systematic double reading for selected, high-risk examination types. A second conclusion is that there seems to be a value of sub-specialisation for increased report quality. A consequent implementation of this would have far-reaching organisational effects.

Key Points

• In double reading, two or more radiologists read the same images.

• A systematic literature review was performed.

• The discrepancy rates varied from 0.4 to 22% in various studies.

• Double reading by sub-specialists found high discrepancy rates.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s13244-018-0599-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.