Developing and validating a psychometric scale for image quality assessment

Development of a radiographic technique for porcine head ballistic research

INTRODUCTION

The porcine model shows structural features comparable to that of humans and are routinely used within research, due to the ethical, legal, and practical use of post-mortem human samples. Methods for obtaining high quality and comparable reference data using standardised acquisition protocols are essential.

METHODS

The decapitated heads of three adult white sows were subjected to radiographic imaging before and after cranial trauma (9 mm, Heckler and Koch MP5). Digital radiographs were generated using a Siemens MULTIX TOP system with an Agfa digital detector, with foam blocks and sandbags as ancillary equipment. An iterative approach was adopted by the authors to generate reproducible radiographic views from two perpendicular angles. Specimens were kept at 5 °C and wrapped in polythene bags to reduce the impact of putrefaction.

RESULTS

Standardised head radiography technique was developed for superior-inferior and lateral views demonstrating porcine anatomy. Key parameters included: automatic exposure control for tube current (∼4 mAs), tube voltage of 73 kVp, 100 cm source to image receptor distance, and an anti-scatter grid. Slight variances in specimen morphology, developmental status, and soft tissue changes did not affect imaging outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The technique and positioning proposed in this study allows for the acquisition of high quality and reproducible radiographic images for comparable ballistic research datasets. Specimen positioning and centring of the primary beam may be applied across porcine breeds, although individual radiographic parameters may differ according to equipment specifications and specimen size.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Development of a reproducible radiographic technique of porcine heads in forensic and veterinary research.

Visual grading experiments and optimization in CBCT dental implantology imaging: preliminary application of integrated visual grading regression

This study uses a general formulation of integrated visual grading regression (IVGR) and applies it to cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan data related to anatomical landmarks for dental implantology. The aim was to assess and predict a minimum acceptable dose for diagnostic imaging and reporting. A skull phantom was imaged with a CBCT unit at various diagnostic exposures. Key anatomical landmarks within the images were independently reviewed by three trained observers. Each provided an overall image quality score. Statistical analysis was carried out to examine the acceptability of the images taken, using an IVGR analysis that was formulized as a three-stage protocol including defining an integrated score, development of an ordinal regression, and investigation of the possibility for dose reduction through estimated parameters. For a unit increase in the logarithm of radiation dose, the odds ratio that the integrated score for an image assessed by observers being rated in a higher category was 3.940 (95% confidence interval: 1.016-15.280). When assessed by the observers, the minimum dose required to achieve a 75% probability for an image to be classified as at least acceptable was 1346.91 mGy·cm² dose area product (DAP), a 31% reduction compared to the 1962 mGy·cm² DAP default dosage of the CBCT unit. The kappa values of the intra and inter-observer reliability indicated moderate agreements, while a discrepancy among observers was also identified because each, as expected, perceived visibility differently. The results of this work demonstrate the IVGR's predictive value of dose saving in the effort to reduce dose to patients while maintaining reportable diagnostic image quality.

Review and optimisation of foot radiography technique

INTRODUCTION

Radiography is an important tool in the diagnosis of trauma and diseases of the foot. Consistent image quality and anatomical appearances are essential to ensure that images are interpreted correctly and this study aims to evaluate current technique and use anthropomorphical phantoms in order to investigate the most optimal radiographic technique.

METHODS

A two part study was conducted. An electronic survey was administered in order to ascertain the current radiographic technique utilised within the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) and compare this with techniques published within radiographic positioning textbooks in common use within the UK. A phantom experiment also sought to identify the most appropriate angulation of the central beam to employ in order to optimally visualise the anatomy for standard non-trauma radiography of the foot. A relative visual grading analysis technique was used to assess radiographic quality.

RESULTS

The electronic survey was completed by 38% of departments (n = 69/182) and demonstrated wide inconsistencies in projections, centring points and beam angulations employed across the NHS. The most commonly employed techniques no longer match the majority of positions described in textbooks. The phantom experiment modelled the ability to accurately visualise anatomy with a variation of the central beam angulation. The results demonstrated that the most commonly described textbook techniques remain the most optimal for accurately visualising the anatomy of the foot.

CONCLUSION

This study has validated the radiographic techniques of the foot described in many of the key texts, however self-reported current practice has diverged from this textbook description.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Reinforcement of fundamental principles will benefit the patient with increased image quality, improved diagnosis and improved consistency of images, particularly when patient care is transferred between centres.

Radiographers' perspectives' on Visual Grading Analysis as a scientific method to evaluate image quality

INTRODUCTION

Radiographers routinely undertake many initiatives to balance image quality with radiation dose (optimisation). For optimisation studies to be successful image quality needs to be carefully evaluated. Purpose was to 1) discuss the strengths and limitations of a Visual Grading Analysis (VGA) method for image quality evaluation and 2) to outline the method from a radiographer's perspective.

METHODS

A possible method for investigating and discussing the relationship between radiographic image quality parameters and the interpretation and perception of X-ray images is the VGA method. VGA has a number of advantages such as being low cost and a detailed image quality assessment, although it is limited to ensure the images convey the relevant clinical information and relate the task based radiography.

RESULTS

Comparing the experience of using VGA and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) it is obviously that less papers are published on VGA (Pubmed n=1.384) compared to ROC (Pubmed n=122.686). Hereby the scientific experience of the VGA method is limited compared to the use of ROC. VGA is, however, a much newer method and it is slowly gaining more and more attention.

CONCLUSION

The success of VGA requires a number of steps to be completed, such as defining the VGA criteria, choosing the VGA method (absolute or relative), including observers, finding the best image display platforms, training observers and selecting the best statistical method for the study purpose should be thoroughly considered.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

Detailed evaluation of image quality for optimisation studies related to technical definition of image quality.

Development and validation of a visual grading scale for assessing image quality of AP pelvis radiographic images

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article was to apply psychometric theory to develop and validate a visual grading scale for assessing the visual perception of digital image quality anteroposterior (AP) pelvis.

METHODS

Psychometric theory was used to guide scale development. Seven phantom and seven cadaver images of visually and objectively predetermined quality were used to help assess scale reliability and validity. 151 volunteers scored phantom images, and 184 volunteers scored cadaver images. Factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha were used to assess scale validity and reliability.

RESULTS

A 24-item scale was produced. Aggregated mean volunteer scores for each image correlated with the rank order of the visually and objectively predetermined image qualities. Scale items had good interitem correlation (≥0.2) and high factor loadings (≥0.3). Cronbach's alpha (reliability) revealed that the scale has acceptable levels of internal reliability for both phantom and cadaver images (α = 0.8 and 0.9, respectively). Factor analysis suggested that the scale is multidimensional (assessing multiple quality themes).

CONCLUSION

This study represents the first full development and validation of a visual image quality scale using psychometric theory. It is likely that this scale will have clinical, training and research applications.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This article presents data to create and validate visual grading scales for radiographic examinations. The visual grading scale, for AP pelvis examinations, can act as a validated tool for future research, teaching and clinical evaluations of image quality.