Gonad dose in AP pelvis radiography: Impact of anode heel orientation

Anode heel effect: Does it impact image quality in digital radiography? A systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

The anode heel effect can be used to optimize image quality and/or patient dose in digital radiography (DR). In film-screen radiography, the effect can equalize optical density in regions of varying attenuation. Clinical experience suggests that the implementation of DR has led to less awareness of anode orientation. Post-processing is assumed to compensate, but may also alter image impression and potentially obscure image details. Published evidence was examined for the influence of the anode heel effect on image quality in DR.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was carried out using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Title and abstracts were screened blinded by three authors, according to in-/exclusion criteria, followed by full-text analysis for final inclusion. Studies where technical and/or visual image quality were reported, was included. All studies were analyzed and assigned quality scores, according to relevant questions. The authors devised a scoring system based on reported information pertaining to reproducibility, interpretation, and generalizability of the methods and conclusions.

RESULTS

Five studies were included of heterogeneous design, each with methodological shortcomings. Only a few anatomical areas were covered. Very few patients were examined, and in no studies were images evaluated by radiologists or reporting radiographers. Relevant information such as post-processing, image quality criteria and analysis was insufficient in most studies, making reproduction difficult. Results were contradictory, especially concerning technical vs visual image quality.

CONCLUSION

Limited published evidence was found quantifying the influence of the anode heel effect on image quality using DR technology. More methodologically, robust studies are needed. The published evidence neither proves nor disproves the impact of the heel effect on image quality in DR.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Based on a systematic review, no firm recommendations for anode orientation relating to image quality in DR can be provided.

Can the anode heel effect be used to optimise radiation dose and image quality for AP pelvis radiography?

INTRODUCTION

A study was conducted to determine whether the anode heel effect can be used to influence optimisation of radiation dose and image quality (IQ) for AP pelvis radiography.

METHODS

ATOM dosimetry phantom and an anthropomorphic phantom were positioned for AP pelvis. Using a CR system, images were acquired and doses were measured with phantom feet toward anode and then feet toward cathode. Exposure factors (kVp, mAs and SID) were systematically generated using a factorial design. Images were scored visually for quality using relative visual grading together with a 3 point Likert scale. Signal to noise ratio was also calculated as a physical measure of image quality. Dosimetry data were collected for the ovaries and testes.

RESULTS

The optimum technique for male, which resulted in lower dose and suitable image quality, was with feet positioned toward the anode (0.80 ± 0.03 mGy; SNR of 38 ± 2.9; visual IQ score 3.13 ± 0.35). The optimum technique for female was with feet toward anode (0.23 ± 0.02 mGy; SNR of 34.7 ± 2.6; visual IQ score 3.15 ± 0.26). kVp had the biggest effect on both visual and physical image quality metrics (p < 0.001) for both tube orientations, whereas SID had the lowest effect on both visual and physical image quality metrics compared with mAs and kVp (p < 0.001). The effect of SID on the SNR was not significant (p > 0.05) with feet toward anode.

CONCLUSION

Positioning the patient with feet toward the anode, as opposed to the cathode, has no adverse effect on visual image quality assessment but it does have an effect on physical image quality.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study would add a new clinical concept in positioning of AP pelvis radiography especially for male positioning.