1
|
Yap SZL, Armstrong S, Aherne N, Shakespeare TP. PSMA-PET-guided dose-escalated volumetric arc therapy for newly diagnosed lymph node-positive prostate cancer: 5 Year outcomes following the FROGG and EviQ node-positive guidelines. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023. [PMID: 37186452 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) Faculty of Radiation Oncology Genitourinary Group (FROGG) guidelines and online EviQ protocols incorporate prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)-guided dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (DE-IMRT) for newly diagnosed lymph node (LN) positive prostate cancer. We evaluated late toxicity and efficacy outcomes following the FROGG and EviQ approach. METHODS Patients with LN-positive-only metastases on PSMA-PET imaging were offered curative therapy with 3 months neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) followed by DE-IMRT and 3 years adjuvant ADT. IMRT was delivered via volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). We aimed to deliver 81 Gy in 45 fractions (Fx) to the prostate and PET-positive LNs, and 60 Gy in 45 Fx to elective pelvic nodes, contoured using the PIVOTAL guidelines. RESULTS Forty-five patients were included. The median number of PET-positive nodes boosted was 2 (range 1-6) and median boost volume 1.16 cc (range 0.15-4.14). Seventeen (38%) patients had PET-positive nodes outside of PIVOTAL contouring guidelines. With 60 months median follow-up, disease-free, metastasis-free, prostate cancer-specific and overall survival were 88.1%, 95.3%, 100% and 91.5%. There were no in-field nodal failures. Late grade 1, 2 and 3 gastrointestinal toxicities occurred in 4%, 2% and 0% of patients, and genitourinary toxicity in 18%, 18% and 4%. Lower limb grade 2 lymphoedema occurred in three patients (7%). CONCLUSION Outcomes following FROGG guidelines and EviQ are promising, with high long-term disease control and low toxicity. Contouring guidelines require modification due to the high rate of PET-positive nodes demonstrated beyond recommended coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaun Zheng Liang Yap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shreya Armstrong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, North Coast Cancer Institute, Lismore Base Hospital, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Noel Aherne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas Philip Shakespeare
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Adequacy of sexual care information given to prostate cancer patients receiving radical external beam radiotherapy. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396922000310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Despite the acknowledged value of providing prostate radiotherapy patients with sexual dysfunction (SD) information, there is little evidence related to patient perceptions of this or the extent to which information is provided to them. This study aimed to critically evaluate the quality and format of SD information given to patients before, during and after radical EBRT to treat prostate cancer.
Method:
Members of UK prostate cancer support groups were asked to complete an anonymous online survey tool seeking opinions of the SD information they were given before, during and after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).
Results:
There were 56 responses to the survey with over 42% of respondents reporting that they had not received any SD information. Of those who did, 78·1% (25/32) received information before the start of EBRT. Physicians were the most involved in the provision of SD information, with nurses and therapeutic radiographers being underutilised. Responses were mostly negative, or neutral regarding the quality of SD information and the information received about impact on relationships, psychological and emotional health. Many participants wanted more information and support.
Conclusion:
This study demonstrates that prostate cancer patients who have undergone radical EBRT have not received adequate information relating to potential sexual function side effects and the psychological and emotional effects of SD. This information should be included in verbal and written information provided at all stages of the radiotherapy pathway.
Collapse
|
3
|
Smith GA, Dunlop A, Barnes H, Herbert T, Lawes R, Mohajer J, Tree AC, McNair HA. Bladder filling in patients undergoing prostate radiotherapy on a MR-linac: The dosimetric impact. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2022; 21:41-45. [PMID: 35243043 PMCID: PMC8857515 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The implementation of adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer compensates for inter-fraction motion, at the penalty of increased time in room. The subsequent increase in bladder filling may impact dosimetry, which we have investigated on ten patients treated on the MR-linac. Patients drank water before treatment, to achieve a bladder volume of 200-300 cm3. Bladder and bowel were re-outlined offline on 140 images and plans recalculated. All mandatory bladder dose constraints and 99.1% of bowel constraints were achieved at time of treatment, despite varying bladder volumes and varying adherence to original bladder filling guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alex Dunlop
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Barnes
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Jonathan Mohajer
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
| | - Alison C. Tree
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
| | - Helen A. McNair
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rowe LS, Mandia JJ, Salerno KE, Shankavaram UT, Das S, Escorcia FE, Ning H, Citrin DE. Bowel and bladder reproducibility in image guided radiation therapy for prostate cancer: Results of a patterns of practice survey. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100902. [PMID: 35847548 PMCID: PMC9280021 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Optimal management of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) to achieve bowel and bladder reproducibility for radiation therapy (RT) and the appropriate planning target volume (PTV) expansions for use with modern image guidance is uncertain. We surveyed American Society of Radiation Oncology radiation oncologists to ascertain practice patterns for definitive PCa RT with respect to patient instructions and set up, daily image guidance, and subsequent PTV expansions. Methods and Materials A pattern of practice survey was sent to American Society of Radiation Oncology radiation oncologists who self-identified as specializing in PCa. Respondents identified the fractionation regimens routinely used, and their practices regarding diet, bowel, and bladder instructions for patients with PCa before RT simulation and throughout treatment. Questions regarding PTV margins, daily set up practices, and use of image guidance were included. Results Of 190 respondents, 158 reported using conventional fractionation (CFx), 49 moderate hypofractionation (MHFx), and 61 stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Diet modifications during RT were advised by 84% of respondents, treatment with full bladder by 96%, and bowel instructions by 78%. Prescription of bowel medication was higher for respondents using SBRT (95.1%) versus those using CFx/MHFx (55.1%; 34.7%). The most common implantable device reported was fiducial markers, with increased use in SBRT (86.0%; 68.9%) versus CFx/MHFx. Cone beam computed tomography was the most common daily imaging technique across fractionation regimens. SBRT showed correlation between PTV margin expansions, fiducial marker use, and image guidance. Conclusions Survey results indicate heterogeneity in treatment modality, dose, patient instructions, and PTV expansions used by radiation oncologists in the treatment of patients with PCa. Further investigation to define appropriate patient instructions on bowel preparation to maximize target reproducibility in PCa is needed, as is continued guidance on evidence-based approaches for image guidance and PTV margin selection.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bahl A, Challapalli A, Jain S, Payne H. Rectal spacers in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A survey of UK uro-oncologists. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75:e14338. [PMID: 33966327 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To understand the awareness and use of rectal spacers for prostate cancer patients undergoing radical radiotherapy in the United Kingdom. METHODS An expert-devised online questionnaire was completed by members of the British Uro-oncology Group (BUG). RESULTS Sixty-three specialists completed the survey (50% of BUG members at that point in time). Only 37% had used rectal spacers, mostly for private patients or those with pre-existing bowel conditions. However, many (68%) would like to use these devices in future. More than 70% of the uro-oncologists felt that bowel toxicity was underreported, but 60% believed that the use of radiotherapy without bowel toxicity was achievable with the use of rectal spacers. CONCLUSIONS The current use of rectal spacers by UK uro-oncologists for patients with localised or locally advanced prostate cancer receiving radiotherapy is low and largely restricted by resourcing issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Bahl
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, University Hospitals Bristol & Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Amarnath Challapalli
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, University Hospitals Bristol & Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Suneil Jain
- Queen's University Belfast and Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast, UK
| | - Heather Payne
- Oncology Department, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nishioka K, Gotoh K, Hashimoto T, Abe T, Osawa T, Matsumoto R, Yokota I, Katoh N, Kinoshita R, Yasuda K, Yakabe T, Yoshimura T, Takao S, Shinohara N, Aoyama H, Shimizu S, Shirato H. Are simple verbal instructions sufficient to ensure that bladder volume does not deteriorate prostate position reproducibility during spot scanning proton therapy? BJR Open 2021; 3:20210064. [PMID: 35707757 PMCID: PMC9185850 DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20210064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether verbal instructions are sufficient for bladder volume (BV) control not to deteriorate prostate position reproducibility in image-guided spot scanning proton therapy (SSPT) for localized prostate cancer. Methods: A total of 268 treatment sessions in 12 consecutive prostate cancer patients who were treated with image-guided SSPT with fiducial markers were retrospectively analyzed. In addition to strict rectal volume control procedures, simple verbal instructions to void urine one hour before the treatment were used here. The BV was measured by a Bladder Scan just before the treatment, and the prostate motion was measured by intraprostatic fiducial markers and two sets of X-ray fluoroscopy images. The correlation between the BV change and prostate motion was assessed by linear mixed-effects models and systematic and random errors according to the reproducibility of the BV. Results: The mean absolute BV change during treatment was from −98.7 to 86.3 ml (median 7.1 ml). The mean absolute prostate motion of the patients in the left-right direction was −1.46 to 1.85 mm; in the cranial-caudal direction it was −6.10 to 3.65 mm, and in the anteroposterior direction −1.90 to 5.23 mm. There was no significant relationship between the BV change and prostate motion during SSPT. The early and late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity was minimal with a minimum follow up of 4.57 years. Conclusions: Simple verbal instructions about urination was suggested to be sufficient to control the BV not to impact on the prostate motion and clinical outcomes in image-guided SSPT. Careful attention to BV change is still needed when the seminal vesicle is to be treated. Advances in knowledge: Our data demonstrated that there was no apparent relationship between BV changes and prostate position reproducibility and simple verbal instruction about urination could be sufficient for image-guided SSPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kentaro Nishioka
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Kento Gotoh
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Radiation Medical physics, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takashige Abe
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takahiro Osawa
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Ryuji Matsumoto
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Isao Yokota
- Department of Biostatistics, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Norio Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Rumiko Kinoshita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Koichi Yasuda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Yakabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takaaki Yoshimura
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Seishin Takao
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Radiation Medical physics, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Nobuo Shinohara
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Aoyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Shinichi Shimizu
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hiroki Shirato
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bladder volume reproducibility after water consumption in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed J 2020; 44:S226-S234. [PMID: 35300945 PMCID: PMC9068550 DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2020.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To minimize toxicity due to radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer, high bladder volume reproducibility is essential. Water consumption is often used to increase bladder volume reproducibility, but the optimal amount of water required to be consumed remains unclear. We aimed to analyzed the relationship between water consumption and bladder volume reproducibility in patients undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that assessed bladder volume change after water consumption in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies published from database inception up until July 4, 2020. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies. The outcome was the mean difference (MD) of bladder volume after water consumption, evaluated through meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Results Ten cohort studies and one randomized controlled trial with a total of 417 patients were included. For 300–400 ml water consumption, the bladder volume MD between during treatment and at computer tomography-simulation (95% confidence interval [CI]) was −11.97 (−51.68 to 27.74), was −45.99 (−82.85 to −9.13) for 500–540 ml water consumption and −45.92 (−78.86 to −12.98) for water consumption until full-bladder sensation was reached. Conclusion Consuming 300–400 ml of water potentially leads to the best bladder volume reproducibility; moreover, the higher the water consumption volume, the lower the bladder volume reproducibility.
Collapse
|
8
|
Schaefer C, Zamboglou C, Volegova-Neher N, Martini C, Nicolay NH, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Rogowski P, Li M, Belka C, Müller AC, Grosu AL, Brunner T. Impact of a low FODMAP diet on the amount of rectal gas and rectal volume during radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer - a prospective pilot study. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:27. [PMID: 32000818 PMCID: PMC6993432 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-1474-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Small inter- and intrafractional prostate motion was shown to be a prerequisite for precise radiotherapy (RT) of prostate cancer (PCa) to achieve good local control and low rectal toxicity. As rectal gas and rectal volume are known to have a relevant effect on prostate motion, this study aims to reduce these parameters by using a Low FODMAP Diet (LFD) and to show feasibility of this intervention. Methods We compared a prospective intervention group (IG, n = 25) which underwent RT for PCa and whose patients were asked to follow a LFD during RT with a retrospective control group (CG, n = 25) which did not get any dietary advice. In the planning CT scan and all available cone beam CT scans rectal gas was classified based on a semiquantitative score (scale from 1 to 5) and rectal volume was measured. Furthermore, patients’ compliance was evaluated by a self-assessment questionnaire. Results Clinical and treatment characteristics were well balanced between both groups. A total of 266 (CG, 10.6 per patient) and 280 CT scans (IG, 11.2 per patient), respectively, were analysed. The frequency distribution of gas scores differed significantly from each other (p < .001) with the IG having lower scores. Rectal volume was smaller in the IG (64.28 cm3, 95% CI 60.92–67.65 cm3, SD 28.64 cm3) than in the CG (71.40 cm3, 95% CI 66.47–76.32 cm3, SD 40.80 cm3) (p = .02). Mean intrapatient standard deviation as a measure for the variability of rectal volume was 22 cm3 in the IG and 23 cm3 in the CG (p = .81). Patients’ compliance and contentment were satisfying. Conclusions The use of a LFD significantly decreased rectal gas and rectal volume. LFD was feasible with an excellent patients’ compliance. However, prospective trials with a larger number of patients and a standardized evaluation of gastrointestinal toxicity and quality of life are reasonable. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00012955. Registered 29 August 2017 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00012955
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Schaefer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Natalja Volegova-Neher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Carmen Martini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils Henrik Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Arndt-Christian Müller
- University Clinic for Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Brunner
- University Clinic for Radiation Therapy, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|