A comparative study about motivations, expectations and future plans for professional development in four European radiography programs

Exploring Radiographers' Engagement in Research: Motivation and Barriers in Five Arab Countries

(1) Background: This study aims to comprehensively understand the motivations driving radiographers in five Arab countries to engage in research. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional study employing an anonymous online survey was conducted for 12 weeks from May to July 2023. The study sample consisted of 250 radiographers, with equal representation from Iraq, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Palestine, Sudan, and the United Arab Emirates. (3) Results: Overall, the participants showed limited involvement in research-related activities in all five countries, particularly in presenting at conferences and publishing in peer-reviewed journals. Most participants believed research positively impacts their professional development (34.8%) and patient care and outcomes (40%). The participants perceived professional development (36.4%) as a key motivator for research engagement. A significant majority (81.6%) expressed motivation to start research in clinical practice. A total of 66.8% found research opportunities available during clinical practice. Barriers included time constraints (56%), limited resources (47.2%), and lack of support and skills (33.2% and 32%, respectively). (4) Conclusion: This study emphasises the need for targeted strategies to enhance research engagement among radiographers in the Arab region. Addressing barriers, such as time constraints and resource limitations, while leveraging intrinsic motivators, such as professional development, is crucial for fostering a culture of research-driven excellence in radiography.

What motivates radiographers to start working with research?

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate the motivation and barriers of clinical radiographers to work with research in a Danish clinical setting.

METHODS

The project was designed as a mixed method explorative study, including survey and focus group interviews. A paper based survey was distributed to clinical radiographers, with a bachelor's degree (few with a diploma in Radiography), at three departments of radiology. The survey collected data on motivation, challenges, and barriers in relation to research in clinical practice. Thematic analyses were performed according to the nature of the survey and used to categorize statements. The focus group interview included five managing radiographers (3 with a bachelor's degree) who formed part of the clinical management at their respective departments.

RESULTS

The survey resulted in 39 responses with an overall response rate of 56%. The majority of clinical radiographers were female (69%, n = 27) and 12 were male.Most radiographers (77%, n = 30) reported interest in research projects and 89% of them (n = 27) found it difficult to dedicate time to research projects next to the clinical work.

CONCLUSION

The study increases the understanding of the motivation and current barriers to start working with research in clinical settings including dependent and independent projects. Clinical radiographers reported to have interest in research. Improvements should focus on department culture, skills, and management support. Clinical Radiographers can be motivated when the departments offer training and support, the projects are relevant to clinical practice and research working hours are provided.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The study offers an insight into current perspectives and obstacles for clinical radiographers in relation to research. The literature on the perception and interest in research by clinical radiographers and managers is limited and further investigation of the field is warranted.

Radiographer-led online image guided adaptive radiotherapy: A qualitative investigation of the therapeutic radiographer role

INTRODUCTION

Online MRI guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRIgRT) is resource intensive. To maintain and increase uptake traditional roles and responsibilities may need refining. This novel study aims to provide an in-depth understanding and subsequent impact of the roles required to deliver on-line adaptive MRIgRT by exploring the current skills and knowledge of radiographers.

METHOD

A purposive sampling approach was used to invite radiographers, clinicians and physicists from centres with experience of MRIgRT to participate. Focus Group Interviews were conducted with two facilitators using a semi-structure interview guide (Appendix 1). Four researchers independently familiarised themselves and coded the data using framework analysis. A consensus thematic framework of ptive Radiotherapy codes and categories was agreed and systematically applied.

RESULTS

Thirty participants took part (Radiographers: N = 18, Physicists: N = 9 and Clinicians: N = 3). Three key themes were identified: 'Current MRIgRT', 'Training' and 'Future Practice'. Current MRIgRT identified a variation in radiographers' roles and responsibilities with pathways ranging from radiographer-led, clinician-light-led and MDT-led. The consensus was to move towards radiographer-led with the need to have a robust on-call service heavily emphasised. Training highlighted the breadth of knowledge required by radiographers including MRI, contouring, planning and dosimetry, and treatment experience. Debate was presented over timing and length of training required. Future Practice identified the need to have radiographers solely deliver MRIgRT, to reduce staff present which was seen as a main driver, and time and resources to train radiographers seen as the main barriers.

CONCLUSION

Radiographer-led MRIgRT is an exciting development because of the potential radiographer role development. A national training framework created collaboratively with all stakeholders and professions involved would ensure consistency in skills and knowledge.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Role development and changes in education for therapeutic radiographers.

A study to investigate undergraduate diagnostic radiographer preferences and expectations of clinical role development: Quantitative findings

INTRODUCTION

Whilst United Kingdom (UK) student ambitions for role development have been surveyed previously, no literature has explored their specialisation preferences. This study aimed to explore these ambitions and preferences in final year diagnostic radiography undergraduates at a Higher-Education Institute (HEI) in the North-West of England.

METHODS

University ethical approval was granted for a survey-based study. A questionnaire consisting of 4 closed questions and 6 open questions was distributed in paper format after a taught session. Responses were collated and summarised in Excel (descriptive statistics), and transferred into SPSS (inferential statistics).

RESULTS

The response rate was 75.6% (n = 34/45). Respondents were predominantly female (73.5%), had A-level as their highest qualification (79.4%) and were of 'school-leaver' age (76.5%) at the start of the degree. By overall total, preferences were for reporting (n = 24/101; 23.8%), computed tomography (CT) (n = 20/101; 19.8%) and MRI/ultrasound (both 12/101; 12.5%). CT had more first choices (n = 8) than reporting (n = 7). 73.5% anticipated specialising in less than 2 years, and 100% within 4 years.

CONCLUSION

Other than a larger percentage having A-level as their highest qualification, the participant demographics were similar to the UK radiography workforce. Reporting, CT, MRI and ultrasound are the specialisation preferences of final year undergraduate diagnostic radiography students. Expectations for the timeline of role development were slightly more ambitious than previously found.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Identification of reporting as the preferred area of specialisation is a novel finding in the context of UK HEIs. Harnessing this ambition will help meet the goals of successive government policy. Ensuring the ambitions of graduate diagnostic radiographers can be satisfied has clear implications for staff retention within the NHS.

Social and health care educators' perceptions of competence in digital pedagogy: A qualitative descriptive study

BACKGROUND

Digitalisation has made digital competence a necessity for those working in social and healthcare. A high degree of competence in digital pedagogy is required of educators to meet the challenge of educating future professionals who are themselves highly digitally competent.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to describe the perceptions of competence in digital pedagogy that educators in social and healthcare have.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive study.

PARTICIPANTS

The participants were Finnish-speaking social and healthcare educators (n = 37) working at six Finnish universities of applied sciences (UAS).

METHODS

Group interviews (n = 12) were conducted during spring 2018. Each group consisted of 2-5 educators, with a total of 37 educators. The data was analysed using an inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

According to the interviewed educators, competence in digital pedagogy involved pedagogical, digital, and ethical skills and awareness. The educators were aware of the possibilities afforded by digital technology and had a positive view on how the technology could be utilised in education. However, the educators were concerned that technology might solely be utilised for the sake of digitalisation instead of being pedagogically preferable.

CONCLUSIONS

In the future, the results of this study can be utilised while developing an instrument to evaluate the level of competence in digital pedagogy. Examining the perceptions of the educators will allows us to better understand the phenomena from the educators' point of view.

Determinants of women's decision to undergo early mammography: A survey study

For young women, mammography has limited effectiveness and entails exposure to radiation, discomfort, and additional expense. This study identifies factors associated with women's willingness to undergo mammography despite official guidelines to the contrary. Using the Health Belief Model, we surveyed Israeli women aged 40-51 who are not at high risk of breast cancer and who had or had never undergone mammography. The results show that sociodemographic characteristics, private insurance coverage, out-of-pocket payments to physicians, and three Health Belief Model categories - lower perceived barriers to mammography, higher expectations of benefits, and stronger health motivation - are associated with the decision to undergo mammography. In addition, higher levels of perceived susceptibility to illness and experience with mammography are significant predictors of intentions to undergo early mammography. Understanding the determinants of women's tendency to undergo mammography contrary to recommendations may help nurses and healthcare policymakers to create health promotion programs targeting this group of women. Preventing unnecessary mammograms may reduce costs to households and health maintenance organizations, mitigate ineffective use of medical facilities, and alleviate the burden on the healthcare system.