Radiography doctorates in Arabia: Current position and opportunities to transform research practice in the Middle East

Voices from the field: A qualitative exploration of sonography professionals in the United Arab Emirates through focus group discussions

INTRODUCTION

The practice of sonography in the United Arab Emirates is evolving rapidly. This study explores the professional landscape and challenges of sonography practice in the United Arab Emirates, focusing on identifying areas for improvement in education, practice scope, and professional development.

METHODS

Employing qualitative methodologies, using focus group discussions and thematic analysis, this research gathers insights from practicing sonographers across various healthcare settings in the UAE to assess current practices, educational needs, and workplace challenges.

RESULTS

Findings reveal a consensus among sonographers on the need for a structured professional framework, standardized education pathways, and clear career progression routes. Additionally, the study highlights a desire among sonographers for an expanded scope of practice, particularly in specialized areas, amidst challenges such as workload and equipment quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The study concludes that enhancing the sonography profession in the UAE requires a comprehensive approach that includes developing a regulatory framework, improving access to specialized training, and recognizing sonographers' advanced practice roles.

IMPLICATIONS OF PRACTICE

Recommendations include establishing accredited educational programs, developing a formal competency framework, and advocating for role expansion and professional recognition. These steps are essential for meeting the evolving needs of the healthcare system and improving patient care outcomes.

Research and evidence-based practice in clinical radiography: A systematic review of barriers and recommendations for a new direction

INTRODUCTION

Existing literature provides valuable insight into the application of evidence-based practice (EBP) in Radiography; however, it primarily focuses on localised, context-specific scenarios within individual countries or institutions. This review aims to systematically explore the barriers to EBP and research implementation in clinical Radiography practice internationally.

METHODOLOGY

A mixed-method systematic review was implemented to obtain data from primary studies of qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods designs. Articles were searched between June and July 2023 from the following scientific databases: PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Science Direct and manual search dating from 2003 to July 2023. The reviewed studies were subjected to data extraction and results-based convergent synthesis.

RESULTS

A total of 376 articles were identified through electronic database search and citation screening after the removal of duplicates. Thirty-one studies met the predetermined inclusion criteria and were included for this review. The challenges to EBP implementation in clinical Radiography are broadly themed around professional and personal obligations, motivation and organisational culture, knowledge and skill gaps, resources and opportunities, and institutional governance.

CONCLUSION

Globally, clinical radiographers perceived a high level of motivation and interest towards research activities. However, numerous barriers were reported such as insufficient time allocation for research, lack of resources, lack of research culture and inadequate research-related skills and knowledge. A transition towards greater evidence-based practice precipitates the quality of clinical Radiography services, augmenting efficiency in the workflow process and enriching patient experience.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Radiography managers must develop strategies that aim to stimulate radiographers to initiate research projects. Beyond allocation of protected time, managers should inspire staff participation in research activities through implementation of effective departmental level culture and governance for quality service delivery and improved patient care.

Exploring Radiographers' Engagement in Research: Motivation and Barriers in Five Arab Countries

(1) Background: This study aims to comprehensively understand the motivations driving radiographers in five Arab countries to engage in research. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional study employing an anonymous online survey was conducted for 12 weeks from May to July 2023. The study sample consisted of 250 radiographers, with equal representation from Iraq, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Palestine, Sudan, and the United Arab Emirates. (3) Results: Overall, the participants showed limited involvement in research-related activities in all five countries, particularly in presenting at conferences and publishing in peer-reviewed journals. Most participants believed research positively impacts their professional development (34.8%) and patient care and outcomes (40%). The participants perceived professional development (36.4%) as a key motivator for research engagement. A significant majority (81.6%) expressed motivation to start research in clinical practice. A total of 66.8% found research opportunities available during clinical practice. Barriers included time constraints (56%), limited resources (47.2%), and lack of support and skills (33.2% and 32%, respectively). (4) Conclusion: This study emphasises the need for targeted strategies to enhance research engagement among radiographers in the Arab region. Addressing barriers, such as time constraints and resource limitations, while leveraging intrinsic motivators, such as professional development, is crucial for fostering a culture of research-driven excellence in radiography.

The barriers, motives, perceptions, and attitudes toward research among radiology practitioners and interns in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study

Background

Research and the use of evidence-based practices are imperative to the advancement of diagnostic imaging modalities. The aim of this study was to assess the perceptions and attitudes of radiology practitioners (i.e., Technicians, Technologists or Specialists, and Senior Specialists) and interns in King Abdulaziz Medical Cities (KAMCs), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, toward research, and to explore the various barriers and obstacles that hinder their research efforts.

Methods

A cross-sectional descriptive investigation was carried out from December 2022 to March 2023 among 112-KAMCs' radiology practitioners and interns, using previously developed and validated questionnaire comprised of five distinct sections, each serving a specific purpose, and with a non-probability convenient sampling technique. Descriptive statistics were generated for participants' demographics, and chi-square and fisher's exact tests were used to examine the association between participants' demographics and their involvement in research.

Results

Among the 137 KAMCs' radiology practitioners and interns who were invited to participate, 112 responded and completed the questionnaire, resulting in an overall response rate of 81.75%. Radiology practitioners and interns from various medical imaging subspecialties were found to be involved in research to the extent of 83%, with nearly half (40.9%) of them have had publications, and 53.3% of these publications being either cross-sectional studies or retrospective clinical studies. A lack of time (66.1%), a lack of a professional supervisor support program (50.9%), and deficiency in research skills (45.5%) were common obstacles that may impede the participants' ability to conduct research. The most common motives for participants to conduct research were the desire to improve their resumes (69.6%), get accepted into postgraduate radiology programs (58%), and improve their research skills (52.7%).

Conclusion

KAMCs' radiology practitioners and interns have a positive attitude toward performing research. Despite the high percentage (83%) of those involved in research, the number of publications remains low. A crucial step to advancing the profession's evidence base is engaging radiology practitioners and interns in research and encouraging radiology practitioner-led research. The study findings can serve as a valuable basis for designing developmental programs aimed at overcoming research obstacles among healthcare professionals in Saudi Arabia.

The changing concept of radiographer's role in UAE: An analysis of radiologists' opinions and acceptance

INTRODUCTION

The role of radiographers in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is currently focused on image acquisition. However, many advances have been made in different countries in recent years whereby radiographers who receive appropriate education and training, can provide image interpretation/reports. When implemented, this role development has enabled a more cost effective and efficient service delivery whilst relieving the burden off radiologists, allowing them to concentrate on more complex imaging examinations. This role development is commonplace in many countries but not in the UAE.

AIM

This study aims to investigate the radiologists' opinions, perceptions, and willingness to accept the advanced practice role of reporting radiographers in the UAE and determine their level of support for implementing these roles.

METHODS

Data was collected utilizing a mixed-methods study design that included a survey and focus group discussions (FGD). Study participants included radiologists who currently work in UAE public and private health organizations. The survey link was emailed directly to the radiologists, together with a covering letter and participants' information sheet outlining the study's aim. Participants indicated on the survey if they wanted to participate in FGD. Two online FGD were conducted using Zoom software (Zoom Video Communications Inc., San Jose, California, United States) and aimed to explore possible reasons for participant's opinions. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ministry of Health, and all methods were performed as per study protocol.

RESULTS

A total of 69 radiologists participated in the survey, 48 males and 21 females aged between 41 and 60 years and with between 11 and 16 years of experience. Most participants (n = 54, 78.2%) believe that radiographers should only perform advanced tasks in image interpretation after obtaining adequate training and under the supervision of a radiologist. According to 55% of radiologists, the development of the radiographer role could draw more UAE nationals to the field. Six participants were recruited to FGD and declared mixed opinions that emphasized the need to improve the radiographers knowledge and experience to enable role development.

CONCLUSION

Radiologists' worries about radiographer engagement in image interpretation may be alleviated if they participate in education and training for new responsibilities. In addition, this could boost the confidence of radiologists and improve trust in radiographer competency and training.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Guidelines and work standards must be developed jointly by radiologists and radiographers to ensure the governance and acceptability of new radiographer reporting roles. Some radiologists perceive that radiographer reporting is possible in UAE when radiographers are trained to set guidelines and with supervision from radiologists. Change is taking place, and many radiologists express optimism for the future, though the rate of change will be determined by a willingness to change attitudes and perceptions.

Changing the model of radiography practice: Challenges of role advancement and future needs for radiographers working in the UAE

INTRODUCTION

The radiographers' role in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is focused on image acquisition with a willingness to accept advanced practice roles after appropriate education and training. Radiographers working in the UAE are highly motivated and ambitious to achieve those internationally identified levels of professional recognition and opportunities for role advancement. This study investigates the radiographers' perspectives, perceptions and hopes for role advancement in the UAE.

METHODS

A qualitative research study design using Focus Group Discussions (FGD) was used to elicit the perceptions of radiographers. Participants were radiographers working in the hospitals and clinics supervised by the Ministry of Health and Prevention. Participants were asked about the recognized tasks defined as advancement roles, needs for roles clinically, challenges and requirements to prepare radiographers to participate in extended/developed roles. The discussions were audio recorded and later transcribed by an independent research assistant. Thematic analysis was used for data analysis RESULTS: 29 radiographers participated in the FGDs, and 83% (n = 24) were interested in role advancement. FGD revealed that their current practice showed some informal extended role that may promote career progression. The most significant challenges identified by participants was their knowledge level as provided by the current curriculum and the need for education and licensing body support to accommodate change.

CONCLUSION

The study identified a need for education and licensing body support to enable change in roles by radiographers, through improving radiographer knowledge and experience for role advancement.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

To sustain role advancement, formal intense training and education are necessary, normally above bachelor's degree level. Furthermore, establishing standards, licensing organizations/professional bodies should be part of the transformation of the profession to enable internationally recognized models to be followed.

Facilitators for and barriers to radiography research in public healthcare in Nordic countries

INTRODUCTION

It has been suggested that the future of diagnostic imaging relies on engagement in research and evidence-based practice. This implies a role transition from a clinical radiographer to a clinical radiographer-researcher. Clinical radiographers' stimuli for engaging in research in Nordic countries are unknown. This study aimed to address this gap.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data collection via an online questionnaire on facilitators for and barriers to participation in radiography research was carried out among 507 clinical radiographers in public healthcare in the Nordic countries: Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden.

RESULTS

Support from colleagues (odds ratio [OR] 2.62) and other professionals (OR 2.74), and self-esteem in research skills (OR ≥ 2.21), were facilitators for radiography research. Lack of knowledge and skills to conduct research (OR 2.48) was revealed to hinder radiographers' participation in research. The absence of a radiography research culture in the workplace explained non-participation in research (OR 1.75).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed significant factors for clinical radiographers' participation in research.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A strategy for establishing a radiography research culture in healthcare is proposed that is novel for the context. Management support for knowledge development and activity leading to inter-professional research projects across knowledge fields, provision of a radiography research lead and acknowledgement of radiography research among colleagues signify the establishment of the culture. These prerequisites might provide a paradigm change towards not only the symbiosis of a clinical radiographer and an autonomous researcher but also a partner who adds radiography research to evidence-based practice in diagnostic imaging.

An extensive survey of radiographers from the Middle East and India on artificial intelligence integration in radiology practice

Assessing the current Artificial intelligence (AI) situation is a crucial step towards its implementation into radiology practice. The study aimed to assess radiographer willingness to accept AI in radiology work practice and the impact of AI in work performance. An exploratory cross-sectional online survey conducted for radiographers working within the Middle East and India was conducted from May–August 2020. A previously validated survey used to obtain radiographer's demographics, knowledge, perceptions, organization readiness, and challenges of integrating AI into radiology. The survey was accessible for radiographers and distributed through the societies page. The survey was completed by 549 radiographers distributed as (77.6%, n = 426) from the Middle East while (22.4%, n = 123) from India. A majority (86%, n = 773) agreed that AI currently plays an important role in radiology and (88.0%, n = 483) expected that AI would play a role in radiology practice and image production. The challenges for AI implementation in practice were developing AI skills (42.8%, n = 235) and AI knowledge development (37.0%, n = 203). Participants showed high interest to integrate AI in under and postgraduate curriculum. There is excitement about what AI could offer, but education input is a requirement. Fears are expressed about job security and how radiology may work across all ages and educational backgrounds. Radiographers become aware of AI role and challenges, which can be improved by education and training.

Assessment of MRI technologists in acceptance and willingness to integrate artificial intelligence into practice

INTRODUCTION

The integration of AI in medical imaging has tremendous exponential growth, especially in image production, image processing and image interpretation. It is expected that radiographers working across all imaging modalities have adequate knowledge as they are part of the end-user team. The current study aimed to investigate the knowledge, willingness and challenges facing the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) technologists in the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into MRI practice.

METHODS

Total of 120 participants were recruited using a snowball sampling technique. A two-phase study was undertaken using survey and focus group discussion (FGD) to capture participants' knowledge, interpretations, needs and obstacles toward AI integrations in MRI practice. The survey and FGD provided the base to understand the participant's' knowledge, acceptance and needs for AI.

RESULTS

Results showed medium to high knowledge, excitement about AI integration without disturbance of MRI practice. Participants thought that AI can improve MRI protocol selection (91.8%), reduce the scan time (65.3%), and improve image post-processing (79.5%). Education and learning resources concerning AI were the main obstacles facing MRI technologists.

CONCLUSION

MRI technologists have the knowledge and possess basic technical information. The application of AI in MRI practice might greatly influence and improve MRI technologist's work. A structured and professional program should be integrated in both undergraduate and continuous education to prepare for effective AI implementation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Application of AI in MRI can be used in many aspects, such as optimize image quality and avoidance of image artifacts. Moreover, AI can play an important role in patient's safety at the MRI unit to reduce incidents. Education, infrastructure, and knowledge of end-users are keys for the incorporation of AI use, development and optimisation.

International perspectives on radiography practice education

INTRODUCTION

The radiography profession is built upon strong educational foundations which help ensure graduate radiographers have the required knowledge, skills, and competence to practise safely and effectively. Changing clinical practices, service needs, technological developments, regulatory changes, together with our growing professional evidence-base, all contribute to the need for our curricula to responsive and continually reviewed and enhanced. This study aims to explore similarities and differences in training curricula and follows a 2012 global survey on radiography education and more recent surveys undertaken by the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS).

METHODS

An online questionnaire, based on previous EFRS education and clinical education surveys, which comprised of open and closed questions and consisted of sections designed to ascertain data on: type, level and duration of education programmes leading to an initial or pre-registration qualification in radiography/medical radiation practice, pre-clinical skill development and clinical placement within programmes. The survey was distributed via social media channels and through an international network of professional societies. Descriptive statistics are reported for most analyses while open questions were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 79 individuals from 28 identified countries across four continents. This represented a total of 121 different pre-registration/entry level programmes offered across these institutions. While dedicated diagnostic radiography programmes were most common (42/121), almost one-third of programmes (40/121) offered two or more areas of specialisation within the curriculum. The average of total hours for clinical placement were 1397 h for diagnostic radiography programmes; 1300 h for radiation therapy programmes; 1025 h for nuclear medicine programmes; and 1134 h for combined specialisation programmes, respectively. Institutions provided a range of physical and virtual systems to support pre-clinical skills development.

CONCLUSION

Around the world, radiography programmes vary considerably in terms of their level, duration, programme type, pre-clinical and clinical training, use of simulation, and also in terms of class sizes, student/staff ratios, and graduate employment prospects. The ability of graduates to work independently in areas covered within their programmes varied considerably. While some changes around simulation use were evident, given the impact of COVID-19 it would be beneficial for future research to investigate if pre-clinical and clinical education hours or use of simulation resources has changed due to the pandemic.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The heterogeneity that exists between radiography programmes presents a significant challenge in terms of the mutual recognition of qualifications and the international movement of the radiographer workforce.