Evaluation of a urology specialist therapeutic radiographer implemented radiotherapy pathway for prostate cancer patients

What do we want? Training! When do we want it? Now? A training needs analysis for adaptive radiotherapy for therapeutic radiographers

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic radiographers (TRs) have adapted to the changing requirements and demands of the oncology service and in response to advanced techniques such as on-line adaptive MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT). The skills required for MRIgRT would benefit many TRs not just those involved in this technique. This study presents the results of a training needs analysis (TNA) for the required MRIgRT skills in readiness for training TRs for current and future practice.

METHODS

A UK-based TNA was used to ask TRs about their knowledge and experience with essential skills required for MRIgRT based on previous investigations into the topic. A five-point Likert scale was used for each of the skills and the difference in values were used to calculate the training need for current and future practice.

RESULTS

261 responses were received (n = 261). The skill rated the most important to current practice was CBCT/CT matching and/or fusion. The current highest priority needs were radiotherapy planning and radiotherapy dosimetry. The skill rated the most important to future practice was CBCT/CT matching and/or fusion. The future highest priority needs were MRI acquisition and MRI Contouring. Over 50% of participants wanted training or additional training in all skills. There was an increase in all values for skills investigated from current to future roles.

CONCLUSION

Although the examined skills were viewed as important to current roles, the future training needs, both overall and high priority, were different compared to current roles. As the 'future' of radiotherapy can arrive rapidly, it is essential that training is delivered appropriately and timely. Before this can occur, there must be investigations into the method and delivery of this training.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Role development. Education changes for therapeutic radiographers.

Images and images: Current roles of therapeutic radiographers

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic radiography is a small profession and has adapted in response to advanced techniques. An increase in on-line adaptive MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) will require role extension for therapeutic radiographers (TRs). This study will investigate the current role description for TRs and the activities they currently undertake with regards to MRIgRT.

METHOD

A training needs analysis was used to ask TRs about their current roles and responsibilities and essential skills required for MRIgRT. For the purposes of this paper, the authors present the results from the demographics of the individual, their current job title with roles and responsibilities, and experience with decision making and image assessment. Descriptive statistics was used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

261 responses were received (n = 261). Only 28% of job titles listed contained the protected title of 'therapeutic radiographer'. Advanced clinical practice roles were expressed by participants indicating that if a service need is presented, emerging roles will be created. Variation existed across the standardised roles of TRs and this discrepancy could present challenges when training for MRIgRT. TRs are pivotal in image verification and recognition on a standard linac, and skills developed there can be transferred to MRIgRT. Decision making is crucial for adaptive techniques and there are many skills within their current scope of practice that are indispensable for the MRIgRT.

CONCLUSION

It has been demonstrated that TRs have a range of roles that cover vast areas of the oncology pathway and so it is important that TRs are recognised so the pivotal role they play is understood by all. TRs have extensive soft-tissue IGRT knowledge and experience, aiding the evolution of decision-making skills and application of off-protocol judgments, the basis of MRIgRT.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Role development and changes in education for therapeutic radiographers.

Advanced practice roles of therapeutic radiographers/radiation therapists: A systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Advances in Radiotherapy (RT) technology and increase of complexity in cancer care have enabled the implementation of new treatment techniques. Subsequently, a greater level of autonomy, responsibility, and accountability in the practice of Therapeutic Radiographers/Radiation Therapists (TR/RTTs) has led to Advanced Practice (AP) roles. The published evidence of this role is scattered with confusing terminology and divergence regarding the perception of whether a specific role represents AP internationally. This study aims to establish an international baseline of evidence on AP roles in RT to identify roles and activities performed by TR/RTTs at advanced level practice and to summarise the impact.

METHODS

A systematic PRISMA review of the literature was undertaken. Thematic analysis was used to synthesise the roles and associated activities. Six RT external experts validated the list. The impact was scrutinised in terms of clinical, organisational, and professional outcomes.

RESULTS

Studies (n = 87) were included and categorised into four groups. AP roles were listed by clinical area, site-specific, and scope of practice, and advanced activities were organised into seven dimensions and 27 sub-dimensions. Three most-reported outcomes were: enhanced service capacity, higher patient satisfaction, and safety maintenance.

CONCLUSION

Evidence-based AP amongst TR/RTTs show how AP roles were conceptualised, implemented, and evaluated. Congruence studies have shown that TR/RTTs are at par with the gold-standard across the various AP roles.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This is the first systematic literature review synthetisising AP roles and activities of TR/RTTs. This study also identified the main areas of AP that can be used to develop professional frameworks and education guiding policy by professional bodies, educators and other stakeholders.