Monte Carlo dosimetric evaluation of high energy vs low energy photon beams in low density tissues

Reinforcing of QA/QC programs in radiotherapy departments in Croatia: results of treatment planning system verification

Implementation of advanced techniques in clinical practice can greatly improve the outcome of radiation therapy, but it also makes the process much more complex with a lot of room for errors. An important part of the quality assurance program is verification of treatment planning system (TPS). Dosimetric verifications in anthropomorphic phantom were performed in 4 centers where new systems were installed. A total of 14 tests for 2 photon energies and multigrid superposition algorithms were conducted using the CMS XiO TPS. Evaluation criteria as specified in the International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Reports Series (IAEA TRS) 430 were employed. Results of measurements are grouped according to the placement of the measuring point and the beam energy. The majority of differences between calculated and measured doses in the water-equivalent part of the phantom were in tolerance. Significantly more out-of-tolerance values were observed in "nonwater-equivalent" parts of the phantom, especially for higher-energy photon beams. This survey was done as a part of continuous effort to build up awareness of quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) importance in the Croatian radiotherapy community. Understanding the limitations of different parts of the various systems used in radiation therapy can systematically improve quality as well.

Dose build-up behind air cavities for Co-60, 4, 6 and 8 MV. Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations

It has been shown in several studies that the build-up in photon beams behind air cavities (such as in the head and neck) increases with energy. In this study this effect is investigated over a broad range of energies that have been used for treating head and neck tumours. The study addresses the question of whether an energy lower than 6 MV is desirable and is based on measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. In a PMMA phantom containing an air cavity (3 x 16 x 3 cm3 at 3 cm depth) an ionization chamber (Capintec PS-033) was used to measure the dose build-up behind the cavity for 4, 6 and 8 MV beam qualities for different field sizes (from 3 x 6 cm2 to 8 x 8 cm2). MC simulations were made using the EGSnrc code for the same geometry and energies as well as for Co-60. Measurements and MC simulations agree well when the fixed-separation plane-parallel chamber measurements have been corrected for the expected over-response in the build-up region. This work demonstrates that the build-up effect of 6 MV is 'closer' to the build-up effect of 8 MV than to that of 4 MV. This suggests that if the build-up effect is of concern when the target volume is in the vicinity of air cavities, 4 MV should be preferred over both 6 MV and 8 MV. This work also shows that the build-up effect for Co-60 is significantly smaller than that of 4 MV. Moreover, the build-up effect increases as the field size decreases. With the increasing use of IMRT (and radiosurgery), small fields are used more frequently making these issues even more relevant. This should be taken into consideration when choosing the accelerator energies for a radiotherapy department.