Effects of hyperoxygenation on FDG-uptake in head-and-neck cancer

The Effect of Carbogen Breathing on 18F-FDG Uptake in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

It has been reported that ¹⁸F-FDG uptake is higher in hypoxic cancer cells than in well-oxygenated cells. We demonstrated that ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in lung cancer would be affected by high concentration oxygen breathing. Methods. Overnight fasted non-small-cell lung cancer A549 subcutaneous (s.c.) xenografts bearing mice (n = 10) underwent ¹⁸F-FDG micro-PET scans, animals breathed room air on day 1, and same animals breathed carbogen (95% O₂ + 5% CO₂) on the subsequent day. In separated studies, autoradiography and immunohistochemical staining visualization of frozen section of A549 s.c. tumors were applied, and to compare between carbogen-breathing mice and those with air breathing, a combination of ¹⁸F-FDG and hypoxia marker pimonidazole was injected 1 h before animal sacrifice, and ¹⁸F-FDG accumulation was compared with pimonidazole binding and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1) expression. Results. PET studies revealed that tumor ¹⁸F-FDG uptake was significantly decreased in carbogen-breathing mice than those with air breathing (P < 0.05). Ex vivo studies confirmed that carbogen breathing significantly decreased hypoxic fraction detected by pimonidazole staining, referring to GLUT-1 expression, and significantly decreased ¹⁸F-FDG accumulation in tumors. Conclusions. High concentration of O₂ breathing during ¹⁸F-FDG uptake phase significantly decreases ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in non-small-cell lung cancer A549 xenografts growing in mice.

Revisit 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose oncology positron emission tomography: "systems molecular imaging" of glucose metabolism

¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography has become an important tool for detection, staging and management of many types of cancer. Oncology application of ¹⁸F-FDG bases on the knowledge that increase in glucose demand and utilization is a fundamental features of cancer. Pasteur effect, Warburg effect and reverse Warburg effect have been used to explain glucose metabolism in cancer. ¹⁸F-FDG accumulation in cancer is reportedly microenvironment-dependent, ¹⁸F-FDG avidly accumulates in poorly proliferating and hypoxic cancer cells, but low in well perfused (and proliferating) cancer cells. Cancer is a heterogeneous and complex “organ” containing multiple components, therefore, cancer needs to be investigated from systems biology point of view, we proposed the concept of “systems molecular imaging” for much better understanding systems biology of cancer.

This article revisits ¹⁸F-FDG uptake mechanisms, its oncology applications and the role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET for “systems molecular imaging”.

Impact of Oxygenation Status on 18F-FDG Uptake in Solid Tumors

The influence of changes in tumor oxygenation (monitored by EPR oximetry) on the uptake of 18F-FDG tracer was evaluated using micro-PET in two different human tumor models. The 18F-FDG uptake was higher in hypoxic tumors compared to tumors that present a pO2 value larger than 10 mmHg.

The increase in tumor oxygenation under carbogen breathing induces a decrease in the uptake of [(18)F]-fluoro-deoxy-glucose

We investigated the impact of oxygenation status (measured by EPR oximetry) on the uptake of (18)F-FDG (measured by PET) in two different tumor models during a carbogen breathing challenge. We observed a significant drop in (18)F-FDG uptake under carbogen breathing that suggests a rapid metabolic adaptation to the oxygen environment.

Time trends in the maximal uptake of FDG on PET scan during thoracic radiotherapy. A prospective study in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose (FDG) uptake on PET scan is a prognostic factor for outcome in NSCLC. We investigated changes in FDG uptake during fractionated radiotherapy in relation to metabolic response with the ultimate aim to adapt treatment according to early response.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-three patients, medically inoperable or with advanced NSCLC, underwent four repeated PET-CT scans before, during and after radiotherapy. Changes in maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) were described. Patients were treated with accelerated radiotherapy with a total tumour-dose depending on normal tissue dose constraints.

RESULTS

The most striking result was the large intra-individual heterogeneity in the evolution of SUVmax. For the total group a non-significant increase in the first week (p=0.05), and a decrease in the second week (p=0.02) and after radiotherapy (p<0.01) was observed. Different time trends were shown for responders (no change during radiotherapy) and non-responders (48% increase during first week, p=0.02 and 15% decrease in the second week, p=0.04). Non-responders had a higher SUVmax on all time points investigated.

CONCLUSIONS

Time trends in SUVmax showed a large intra-individual heterogeneity and different patterns for metabolic responders and non-responders. These new findings may reflect intrinsic tumour characteristics and might finally be useful to adapt treatment.