1
|
Ito M, Makita C, Mori T, Takano H, Kumano T, Matsuo M, Iinuma K, Kawase M, Nakane K, Nakano M, Koie T. Associations of Clinical and Dosimetric Parameters with Urinary Toxicities after Prostate Brachytherapy: A Long-Term Single-Institution Experience. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:5680-5689. [PMID: 37366909 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30060426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
To examine the association of clinical, treatment, and dose parameters with late urinary toxicity after low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) for prostate cancer, we retrospectively studied patients with prostate cancer who underwent LDR-BT from January 2007 through December 2016. Urinary toxicity was assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptom Score (OABSS). Severe and moderate lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were defined as IPSS ≥ 20 and ≥ 8, respectively; OAB was defined as a nocturnal frequency of ≥ 2 and a total OABSS of ≥ 3. In total, 203 patients (median age: 66 years) were included, with a mean follow-up of 8.4 years after treatment. The IPSS and OABSS worsened after 3 months of treatment; these scores improved to pretreatment levels after 18-36 months in most patients. Patients with a higher baseline IPSS and OABSS had a higher frequency of moderate and severe LUTS and OAB at 24 and 60 months, respectively. LUTS and OAB at 24 and 60 months were not correlated with the dosimetric factors of LDR-BT. Although the rate of long-term urinary toxicities assessed using IPSS and OABSS was low, the baseline scores were related to long-term function. Refining patient selection may further reduce long-term urinary toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaya Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gifu Takayama Red Cross Hospital, 3-11, Tenmancho, Takayama City 500-8717, Gifu, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Chiyoko Makita
- Department of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Takayuki Mori
- Department of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Hirota Takano
- Department of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Tomoyasu Kumano
- Department of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Masayuki Matsuo
- Department of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Koji Iinuma
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Makoto Kawase
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Keita Nakane
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| | - Masahiro Nakano
- Department of Urology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, 4-6-1, Noisshiki, Gifu City 500-8717, Gifu, Japan
| | - Takuya Koie
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City 500-1194, Gifu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Offersen BV, Aznar MC, Bacchus C, Coppes RP, Deutsch E, Georg D, Haustermans K, Hoskin P, Krause M, Lartigau EF, Lee AWM, Löck S, Thwaites DI, van der Kogel AJ, van der Heide U, Valentini V, Overgaard J, Baumann M. The role of ESTRO guidelines in achieving consistency and quality in clinical radiation oncology practice. Radiother Oncol 2023; 179:109446. [PMID: 36566990 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.109446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Birgitte Vrou Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Marianne C Aznar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Carol Bacchus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rob P Coppes
- Department of Biomedical Sciences of Cells & Systems, Section Molecular Cell Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut d'Oncologie Thoracique (IOT), Gustave Roussy, France
| | - Dieter Georg
- Division Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre and University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany
| | - Eric F Lartigau
- Academic Department of Radiotherapy, Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, Lille, France
| | - Anne W M Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Cancer Metastasis and Personalized Therapy, University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, China
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany
| | - David I Thwaites
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Australia; Radiotherapy Research Group, St James's Hospital and University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Albert J van der Kogel
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA
| | - Uulke van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gonzalez-Perez V, Rembielak A, Luis Guinot J, Jaberi R, Lancellotta V, Walter R, Zuchora A, Budrukkar A, Kovács G, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Siebert FA, Tagliaferri L. H&N and Skin (HNS) GEC-ESTRO Working Group critical review of recommendations regarding prescription depth, bolus thickness and maximum dose in skin superficial brachytherapy with flaps and customized moulds. Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:122-132. [PMID: 36030932 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this publication is the assessment of the existing guidelines for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) superficial brachytherapy (BT) and make a critical review based on the existing literature about the maximum dose prescription depth, bolus thickness and maximum skin surface dose (Dmax) of the published clinical practice. A systematic review of NMSC superficial BT published articles was carried out by the GEC-ESTRO Head & Neck and Skin (HNS) Working Group (WG). 10 members and 2 external reviewers compared the published clinical procedures with the recommendations in the current guidelines and examined the grade of evidence. Our review verified that there is a large variation among centres with regards to clinical practice in superficial BT and identified studies where published parameters such as maximum dose prescription depth, bolus thickness and Dmax exceed the constraints recommended in the guidelines, while showing excellent results in terms of local control, toxicity and cosmesis. This review confirmed that current recommendations on skin superficial BT do not include published experience on tumours treated with superficial BT that require dose prescription depth beyond the recommended 5mm under the skin surface and that the existing literature does not provide sufficient evidence to relate dosimetry of superficial BT to patient reported outcome measures. The GEC-ESTRO HNS WG considers acceptable to prescribe superficial BT dose at a depth above 5mm beyond the skin surface, and modify the bolus thickness to optimize the treatment plan and adjust the acceptable maximum dose on the skin surface, all pending clinical situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Gonzalez-Perez
- Department of Medical Physics, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (F.I.V.O.). Beltran Baguena 8, 46009. Valencia, Spain.
| | - Agata Rembielak
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust. 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, M13 9PL Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - Jose Luis Guinot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (F.I.V.O.). Beltran Baguena 8, 46009. Valencia, Spain.
| | - Ramin Jaberi
- Radiation Oncology Research Centre (RORC), Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Keshavarz Blvd, Qods Street, 1417863181.Tehran, Iran.
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168. Rome, Italy.
| | - Renate Walter
- Department of Medical Physics. Universitätsklinikum Augsburg. Stenglinstr 2, 86156 Augsburg, Deutschland. Renate.
| | - Anysja Zuchora
- Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering. University Hospital Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway H91 YR71, Ireland.
| | - Ashwini Budrukkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital Homi Bhabha National Institute, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel. Mumbai, India 400012.
| | - György Kovács
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Gemelli - Interacts. Rome, Italy.
| | - Ina Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht. Lundlaan, 3584. Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Frank-André Siebert
- Clinic of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus L, 24105. Kiel, Germany.
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168. Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Assam I, Vijande J, Ballester F, Pérez-Calatayud J, Poppe B, Siebert FA. Evaluation of dosimetric effects of metallic artifact reduction and tissue assignment on Monte Carlo dose calculations for 125 I prostate implants. Med Phys 2022; 49:6195-6208. [PMID: 35925023 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Monte Carlo (MC) simulation studies, aimed at evaluating the magnitude of tissue heterogeneity in 125 I prostate permanent seed implant brachytherapy (BT), customarily use clinical post-implant CT images to generate a virtual representation of a realistic patient model (virtual patient model). Metallic artifact reduction (MAR) techniques and tissue assignment schemes (TAS) are implemented on the post-implant CT images to mollify metallic artifacts due to BT seeds and to assign tissue types to the voxels corresponding to the bright seed spots and streaking artifacts, respectively. The objective of this study is to assess the combined influence of MAR and TAS on MC absorbed dose calculations in post-implant CT-based phantoms. The virtual patient models used for 125 I prostate implant MC absorbed dose calculations in this study are derived from the CT images of an external radiotherapy prostate patient without BT seeds and prostatic calcifications, thus averting the need to implement MAR and TAS. METHODS The geometry of the IsoSeed I25.S17plus source is validated by comparing the MC calculated results of the TG-43 parameters for the line source approximation with the TG-43U1S2 consensus data. Four MC absorbed dose calculations are performed in two virtual patient models using the egs_brachy MC code: (1) TG-43-based Dw,w-TG 43 , (2) Dw,w-MBDC that accounts for interseed scattering and attenuation (ISA), (3) Dm,m that examines ISA and tissue heterogeneity by scoring absorbed dose in tissue, and (4) Dw,m that unlike Dm,m scores absorbed dose in water. The MC absorbed doses (1) and (2) are simulated in a TG-43 patient phantom derived by assigning the densities of every voxel to 1.00 g cm-3 (water), whereas MC absorbed doses (3) and (4) are scored in the TG-186 patient phantom generated by mapping the mass density of each voxel to tissue according to a CT calibration curve. The MC absorbed doses calculated in this study are compared with VariSeed v8.0 calculated absorbed doses. To evaluate the dosimetric effect of MAR and TAS, the MC absorbed doses of this work (independent of MAR and TAS) are compared to the MC absorbed doses of different 125 I source models from previous studies that were calculated with different MC codes using post-implant CT-based phantoms generated by implementing MAR and TAS on post-implant CT images. RESULTS The very good agreement of TG-43 parameters of this study and the published consensus data within 3% validates the geometry of the IsoSeed I25.S17plus source. For the clinical studies, the TG-43-based calculations show a D90 overestimation of more than 4% compared to the more realistic MC methods due to ISA and tissue composition. The results of this work generally show few discrepancies with the post-implant CT-based dosimetry studies with respect to the D90 absorbed dose metric parameter. These discrepancies are mainly Type B uncertainties due to the different 125 I source models and MC codes. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of MAR and TAS on post-implant CT images have no dosimetric effect on the 125 I prostate MC absorbed dose calculation in post-implant CT-based phantoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isong Assam
- UKSH, Campus Kiel, Clinic of Radiotherapy (Radiooncology), Kiel, Germany
| | - Javier Vijande
- Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universitat de Valencia (UV), Burjassot, Spain.,Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Radiofísica e Instrumentación Nuclear en Medicina (IRIMED), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS-La Fe), Universitat de Valencia (UV), Valencia, Spain.,Instituto de Física Corpuscular, IFIC (UV-CSIC), Burjassot, Spain
| | - Facundo Ballester
- Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universitat de Valencia (UV), Burjassot, Spain.,Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Radiofísica e Instrumentación Nuclear en Medicina (IRIMED), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS-La Fe), Universitat de Valencia (UV), Valencia, Spain
| | - José Pérez-Calatayud
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain.,Radiotherapy Department, Clinica Benidorm, Alicante, Spain
| | - Björn Poppe
- Center for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology - University Center for Medical Radiation Physics, Pius-Hospital, Medical Campus of Carl-von-Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
CT-MR Image Fusion for Post-Implant Dosimetry Analysis in Brain Tumor Seed Implantation- a Preliminary Study. DISEASE MARKERS 2022; 2022:6310262. [PMID: 35620270 PMCID: PMC9129983 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6310262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To calculate and evaluate postimplant dosimetry (PID) with CT-MR fusion technique after brain tumor brachytherapy and compare the result with CT-based PID. Methods and Materials 16 brain tumor patients received MR-guided intervention with Iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation entered this preliminary study for PID evaluation. Registration and fusion of CT and MR images of the same patients were performed one day after operation. Seeds identification and targets delineation were carried out on CT, MR, and CT-MR fusion images, each. The number and location of seeds on MR or CT- MR fusion images were compared with those of actually implanted seeds. Clinical target volume (CTV) and dosimetric parameters such as %D90, %V100 and external V100 were measured and calculated. In addition, the correlation of the fusion to CT CTV ratio and other factors were analyzed. Results The numbers of fusion seeds were not significantly different compared with reference seeds (t =1.76, p >0.05). The difference between reference seeds numbers and truly extracted MR seeds numbers was statistically significant (t =3.91, p <0.05). All dosimetric parameters showed significant differences between the two techniques (p <0.05). The mean CTV delineated on fusion images was 34.3 ± 33.6, smaller than that on CT images. The mean values of external V100, %V100 and %D90 on fusion images were larger than those on CT images. Correlation analysis showed that the fusion-CT V100 ratio was positively and significantly correlated with the fusion-CT volume ratio. Conclusions This preliminary study indicated that CT-MR fusion-based PID exhibited good accuracy for 125I brain tumor brachytherapy dosimetry when compared to CT-based PID and merits further research to establish best-outcome protocols.
Collapse
|
6
|
Autonomous Prostate Segmentation in 2D B-Mode Ultrasound Images. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/app12062994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Prostate brachytherapy is a treatment for prostate cancer; during the planning of the procedure, ultrasound images of the prostate are taken. The prostate must be segmented out in each of the ultrasound images, and to assist with the procedure, an autonomous prostate segmentation algorithm is proposed. The prostate contouring system presented here is based on a novel superpixel algorithm, whereby pixels in the ultrasound image are grouped into superpixel regions that are optimized based on statistical similarity measures, so that the various structures within the ultrasound image can be differentiated. An active shape prostate contour model is developed and then used to delineate the prostate within the image based on the superpixel regions. Before segmentation, this contour model was fit to a series of point-based clinician-segmented prostate contours exported from conventional prostate brachytherapy planning software to develop a statistical model of the shape of the prostate. The algorithm was evaluated on nine sets of in vivo prostate ultrasound images and compared with manually segmented contours from a clinician, where the algorithm had an average volume difference of 4.49 mL or 10.89%.
Collapse
|
7
|
Haddad H, Hermani H, Bischoff P, Hanitzsch H, Heidrich A, Schaefer A, Kovács A, Pinkawa M. Permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer implementing neoadjuvant prostatic artery embolization. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:308-316. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
8
|
Henry A, Pieters BR, André Siebert F, Hoskin P. GEC-ESTRO ACROP prostate brachytherapy guidelines. Radiother Oncol 2022; 167:244-251. [PMID: 34999134 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This is an evidence-based guideline for prostate brachytherapy. Throughout levels of evidence quoted are those from the Oxford Centre for Evidence based Medicine (https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/oxford-centre-for-evidence-based-medicine-levels-of-evidence-march-2009). Prostate interstitial brachytherapy using either permanent or temporary implantation is an established and evolving treatment technique for non-metastatic prostate cancer. Permanent brachytherapy uses Low Dose Rate (LDR) sources, most commonly I-125, emitting photon radiation over months. Temporary brachytherapy involves first placing catheters within the prostate and, on confirmation of accurate positioning, temporarily introducing the radioactive source, generally High Dose Rate (HDR) radioactive sources of Ir-192 or less commonly Co-60. Pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy has also been used for prostate cancer [1] but few centres have adopted this approach. Previous GEC ESTRO recommendations have considered LDR and HDR separately [2-4] but as there is considerable overlap, this paper provides updated guidance for both treatment techniques. Prostate brachytherapy allows safe radiation dose escalation beyond that achieved using external beam radiotherapy alone as it has greater conformity around the prostate, sparing surrounding rectum, bladder, and penile bulb. In addition there are fewer issues with changes in prostate position during treatment delivery. Systematic review and randomised trials using both techniques as boost treatments demonstrate improved PSA control when compared to external beam radiotherapy alone [5-7].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Henry
- St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank André Siebert
- University of Kiel/University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pommier P, Ferré M, Blanchard P, Martin É, Peiffert D, Robin S, Hannoun-Lévi JM, Marchesi V, Cosset JM. Prostate cancer brachytherapy: SFRO guidelines 2021. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:344-355. [PMID: 34955422 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Prostate brachytherapy techniques are described, concerning both permanent seed implant and high dose rate brachytherapy. The following guidelines are presented: brachytherapy indications, implant procedure for permanent low dose rate implants and high dose rate with source projector, as well as dose and dose-constraints objectives, immediate postoperative management, post-treatment evaluation, and long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Pommier
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69373 Lyon cedex 08, France.
| | - M Ferré
- Département de physique médicale, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232, boulevard Sainte-Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - P Blanchard
- Département de radiothérapie, institut Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif cedex, France
| | - É Martin
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue du Pr-Marion, BP 77980, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - D Peiffert
- Service universitaire de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine centre Alexis-Vautrin, 6, avenue de Bourgogne, CS 30519, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy cedex, France
| | - S Robin
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69373 Lyon cedex 08, France
| | - J-M Hannoun-Lévi
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice cedex 2, France
| | - V Marchesi
- Unité de physique médicale, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine centre Alexis-Vautrin, avenue de Bourgogne, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - J M Cosset
- Centre de radiothérapie Charlebourg/La Défense, groupe Améthyst, 65, avenue Foch, 92250 La Garenne-Colombes, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
The 2020 recommendations for good brachytherapy procedures ("Recorad") are updated based on the 2016 article. This new brachytherapy article took into account recent data published in the literature as well as international recommendations. The different brachytherapy steps are successively described from the treatment preparation (brachytherapy technique prescription; procedure and material, dedicated images for planification, dose distribution analysis and validation) to the end of the procedure as well as post-treatment surveillance.
Collapse
|
11
|
Wei S, Li C, Li M, Xiong Y, Jiang Y, Sun H, Qiu B, Lin CJ, Wang J. Radioactive Iodine-125 in Tumor Therapy: Advances and Future Directions. Front Oncol 2021; 11:717180. [PMID: 34660280 PMCID: PMC8514864 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.717180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Radioactive iodine-125 (I-125) is the most widely used radioactive sealed source for interstitial permanent brachytherapy (BT). BT has the exceptional ability to deliver extremely high doses that external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) could never achieve within treated lesions, with the added benefit that doses drop off rapidly outside the target lesion by minimizing the exposure of uninvolved surrounding normal tissue. Spurred by multiple biological and technological advances, BT application has experienced substantial alteration over the past few decades. The procedure of I-125 radioactive seed implantation evolved from ultrasound guidance to computed tomography guidance. Compellingly, the creative introduction of 3D-printed individual templates, BT treatment planning systems, and artificial intelligence navigator systems remarkably increased the accuracy of I-125 BT and individualized I-125 ablative radiotherapy. Of note, utilizing I-125 to treat carcinoma in hollow cavity organs was enabled by the utility of self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs). Initially, I-125 BT was only used in the treatment of rare tumors. However, an increasing number of clinical trials upheld the efficacy and safety of I-125 BT in almost all tumors. Therefore, this study aims to summarize the recent advances of I-125 BT in cancer therapy, which cover experimental research to clinical investigations, including the development of novel techniques. This review also raises unanswered questions that may prompt future clinical trials and experimental work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuhua Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University 3rd Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chunxiao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University 3rd Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Mengyuan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University 3rd Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Xiong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University 3rd Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yuliang Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University 3rd Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Haitao Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University 3rd Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bin Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University 3rd Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | - Junjie Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University 3rd Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
King MT, Keyes M, Frank SJ, Crook JM, Butler WM, Rossi PJ, Cox BW, Showalter TN, Mourtada F, Potters L, Stock RG, Kollmeier MA, Zelefsky MJ, Davis BJ, Merrick GS, Orio PF. Low dose rate brachytherapy for primary treatment of localized prostate cancer: A systemic review and executive summary of an evidence-based consensus statement. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:1114-1129. [PMID: 34509378 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this guideline is to present evidence-based consensus recommendations for low dose rate (LDR) permanent seed brachytherapy for the primary treatment of prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS The American Brachytherapy Society convened a task force for addressing key questions concerning ultrasound-based LDR prostate brachytherapy for the primary treatment of prostate cancer. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify prospective and multi-institutional retrospective studies involving LDR brachytherapy as monotherapy or boost in combination with external beam radiation therapy with or without adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. Outcomes included disease control, toxicity, and quality of life. RESULTS LDR prostate brachytherapy monotherapy is an appropriate treatment option for low risk and favorable intermediate risk disease. LDR brachytherapy boost in combination with external beam radiation therapy is appropriate for unfavorable intermediate risk and high-risk disease. Androgen deprivation therapy is recommended in unfavorable intermediate risk and high-risk disease. Acceptable radionuclides for LDR brachytherapy include iodine-125, palladium-103, and cesium-131. Although brachytherapy monotherapy is associated with increased urinary obstructive and irritative symptoms that peak within the first 3 months after treatment, the median time toward symptom resolution is approximately 1 year for iodine-125 and 6 months for palladium-103. Such symptoms can be mitigated with short-term use of alpha blockers. Combination therapy is associated with worse urinary, bowel, and sexual symptoms than monotherapy. A prostate specific antigen <= 0.2 ng/mL at 4 years after LDR brachytherapy may be considered a biochemical definition of cure. CONCLUSIONS LDR brachytherapy is a convenient, effective, and well-tolerated treatment for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin T King
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
| | - Mira Keyes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Juanita M Crook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada
| | - Wayne M Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Schiffler Cancer Center, Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, WV
| | - Peter J Rossi
- Calaway Young Cancer Center, Valley View Hospital, Glenwood Springs, CO
| | - Brett W Cox
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Firas Mourtada
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE
| | - Louis Potters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY
| | - Richard G Stock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mt. Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Marisa A Kollmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Brian J Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Gregory S Merrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Schiffler Cancer Center, Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, WV
| | - Peter F Orio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Langley S, Eden C, Perry M, Patil K, Moschonas D, Higgins D, Deering C, Laing R, Perna C, Khaksar S, Uribe-Lewis S, Uribe J. Robot-assisted salvage seminal vesicle excision for isolated recurrence after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. BJU Int 2021; 129:731-736. [PMID: 34460980 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report clinical and functional outcomes for patients who have undergone salvage robot-assisted seminal vesicle excision (RA-SVE) for the focal treatment of isolated seminal vesical (SV) recurrence after treatment for prostate cancer by low-dose-rate brachytherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB) underwent multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) of the prostate and 11 C-Choline or 68 Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (68 Ga-PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan, followed by targeted transperineal biopsy of the prostate and SVs. Isolated SV recurrence were identified in 17 (0.38%) LDR-PB patients. These 17 patients were offered RA-SVE. RESULTS The median total operative time was 90 min and blood loss 50 mL with no postoperative transfusions required. The median hospital stay was 1 day. No intra- or postoperative complications were documented. Continence status was unaffected, no patient required urinary pads. Postoperative pathology confirmed SV invasion in all specimens. Surgical margins were positive in seven (41%) patients. All patients had at least one positive imaging study, although three (18%) mp-MRI and five (29%) PET/CT assessments were negative. One (6%) pre-SVE biopsy was also negative but with positive imaging. Salvage SVE failure, defined as three consecutive PSA rises or the need for further treatment, occurred in six patients of whom three had a positive margin. Overall failure-free survival rates were 86%, 67%, and 53% at 1, 2, and 3 years after SVE, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Salvage RA-SVE appears to be a safe focal treatment, with very low morbidity, for patients with localised SV recurrence after LDR-PB. It permits deferral of androgen deprivation therapy in selected patients. Bilateral SVE is mandatory. This surgical option should be considered in patients with isolated prostate cancer recurrence to the SV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Langley
- The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Christopher Eden
- The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Matthew Perry
- The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Krishna Patil
- The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Dimitrios Moschonas
- The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Donna Higgins
- The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Claire Deering
- The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Robert Laing
- The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Carla Perna
- The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Sara Khaksar
- The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Santiago Uribe-Lewis
- The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Jennifer Uribe
- The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Farris JC, Hughes RT, Steber CR, Craven TE, Frizzell BA. Patient assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms using the international prostate symptom score following low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:1107-1113. [PMID: 34353749 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To correlate changes in urinary patient-reported outcomes including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), acute urinary retention and urethral stricture with urethral dose in those treated with low dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients treated with prostate LDR between 2012 and 2019 (n=117) completed IPSS urinary symptom assessments prior to treatment and at each follow-up. CT simulation was obtained with urinary catheter 1-month post-implant for dosimetric analysis. 113 patients with pre- and ≥1 post-LDR IPSS score available were analyzed. Urethral dosimetric parameters including U75, U100, U125, U150 and U200 were abstracted from post-implant dosimetry and assessed for association with urinary toxicity using bivariate logistic regression and Spearman correlation. Outcomes included clinically significant change (CSC, defined as 4 or more points or 25% rise above baseline) in IPSS score at 6 and 12 months, acute urinary retention (AUR), and urethral stricture (US). RESULTS 89 (79%) patients were treated with LDR monotherapy (145 Gy) and 24 (21%) with LDR boost (110 Gy) with external beam radiation therapy. Twenty (18%) had baseline IPSS ≥15. Median IPSS scores were: baseline 6 (3-12; n=113), 1-month 17 (10-25; n=110), 6 months 12 (7-18; n=77), 1 year 8 (5-14; n=52). CSC-6 was observed in 59 (77%), CSC-12 in 26 (50%), AUR in 12 (11%), and US in 4 (4%). No association was identified between urethral dose parameters and CSC-6, CSC-12, AUR, or US. No correlation between urethral dose and IPSS at 6- and 12-months was identified. The IPSS ≥15 group exhibited lower rates of CSC-12 (13% v. 57%, p=0.05) but not CSC-6 (55% v. 80%, p=0.12). CONCLUSIONS We did not find a relationship between urethral dose and IPSS elevation, AUR or US. We did identify a significantly lower change in IPSS at 12 months for those with baseline IPSS ≥15 compared to those with low baseline scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Farris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC.
| | - R T Hughes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| | - C R Steber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| | - T E Craven
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| | - B A Frizzell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chang CB, Lin YC, Wong YC, Lin SN, Lin CY, Lin YH, Sheng TW, Huang CC, Yang LY, Wang LJ. IVIM Parameters on MRI Could Predict ISUP Risk Groups of Prostate Cancers on Radical Prostatectomy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:659014. [PMID: 34277409 PMCID: PMC8282053 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.659014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To elucidate the usefulness of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)/apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameters in preoperative risk stratification using International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grades. Materials and Methods Forty-five prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) after prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) were included. The ISUP grades were categorized into low-risk (I-II) and high-risk (III-V) groups, and the concordance between the preoperative and postoperative grades was analyzed. The largest region of interest (ROI) of the dominant tumor on each IVIM/ADC image was delineated to obtain its histogram values (i.e., minimum, mean, and kurtosis) of diffusivity (D), pseudodiffusivity (D*), perfusion fraction (PF), and ADC. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of the IVIM/ADC parameters without and with preoperative ISUP grades were performed to identify predictors for the postoperative high-risk group. Results Thirty-two (71.1%) of 45 patients had concordant preoperative and postoperative ISUP grades. Dmean, D*kurtosis, PFkurtosis, ADCmin, and ADCmean were significantly associated with the postoperative ISUP risk group (all p < 0.05). Dmean and D*kurtosis (model I, both p < 0.05) could predict the postoperative ISUP high-risk group with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.842 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.726-0.958. The addition of D*kurtosis to the preoperative ISUP grade (model II) may enhance prediction performance, with an AUC of 0.907 (95% CI 0.822-0.992). Conclusions The postoperative ISUP risk group could be predicted by Dmean and D*kurtosis from mpMRI, especially D*kurtosis. Obtaining the biexponential IVIM parameters is important for better risk stratification for PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Bi Chang
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chun Lin
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yon-Cheong Wong
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shin-Nan Lin
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Yuan Lin
- Department of Clinical Science, General Electric (GE) Healthcare, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Han Lin
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ting-Wen Sheng
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Chih Huang
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Lan-Yan Yang
- Biostatistics Unit of Clinical Trial Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Li-Jen Wang
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Low-/high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy: long-term results from a single institution team experience. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2021; 13:135-144. [PMID: 33897786 PMCID: PMC8060960 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2021.105280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare brachytherapy (BT) boost of low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) techniques in patients diagnosed with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Material and methods Between January 2005 and February 2018, 142 patients (50 LDR and 92 HDR) with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with a BT boost, and retrospectively analyzed. Prescribed dose was 45 Gy with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) plus 100-108 Gy with LDR-BT, and 60 Gy with EBRT plus one fraction of 10 Gy with HDR-BT. 99% of patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for 6 months. Primary endpoint was to compare LDR and HDR boosts in terms of biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS). Secondary endpoint, after re-classifying patients into "favorable" and "unfavorable" sub-groups, was to analyze differences with a similar treatment intensity. Results Median overall follow-up for the total cohort was 66.5 months (range, 16-185 months). There were no significant differences in bPFS, overall survival, cause specific survival, local failure, lymph node failure, or distant failure when LDR or HDR was employed. bPFS at 90 months was 100% for favorable, and 89% and 85% for unfavorable patients at 60 months and 90 months, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.017). The crude incidence of genitourinary acute and chronic toxicity grade 3 was 0.7% and 4%, respectively. Twelve patients (8%) had chronic rectal hemorrhage grade 2, in whom argon was applied (4 LDR and 8 HDR). Conclusions Combined treatment is an excellent therapeutic option in patients with intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma, with similar results in both LDR and HDR approaches and very low toxicities. Importantly, the current literature has indicated that unfavorable-risk patients belong to a different category, and should be treated as patients with high-risk factors. Therefore, the stratification and identification of both risk groups is extremely relevant.
Collapse
|
17
|
Singh T, Lee J, Zahurak M, Bae HJ, Habtu T, Hobbs R, Le Y, Burdette EC, Song DY. Superior Postimplant Dosimetry Achieved Using Dynamic Intraoperative Dosimetry for Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 11:264-271. [PMID: 33722782 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Low-dose-rate brachytherapy is a highly effective treatment modality for prostate carcinoma, but postimplant dosimetry quality is essential and correlated with likelihood of treatment success. Registered ultrasound and fluoroscopy (iRUF) can facilitate real-time intraoperative monitoring and plan adaptation, with the aim of attaining superior dosimetric outcomes. The purpose of this research was to compare clinical postimplant dosimetric results of iRUF-guided brachytherapy against brachytherapy using standard ultrasound-guided intraoperative dosimetry methods. METHODS AND MATERIALS We analyzed postimplant dosimetry in 292 patients treated with Pd-103 between January 2007 and December 2018. All patients had postimplant dosimetry measured on day 0 to 1 using fused magnetic resonance/computed tomography assessment. Fifty-two patients were treated in 2 prospective clinical trials using iRUF intraoperative dosimetry, including 6 patients in a pilot study and 46 treated in a phase 2 study. Postimplant dosimetry in iRUF-treated patients was compared with dosimetry from 240 patients treated using standard (real-time ultrasound) intraoperative seed tracking. RESULTS For every parameter measuring dose coverage to the prostate, iRUF patients had significantly higher values, irrespective of adjustment for year of treatment. In adjusted analyses, parameters of dose to urethra and rectum were not significantly higher among iRUF-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS Use of iRUF intraoperative dosimetry was associated with improved postimplant dose coverage in prostate, without associated increases in doses to urethra or rectum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanmay Singh
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Junghoon Lee
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Marianna Zahurak
- Departments of Oncology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Division, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hee Joon Bae
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Tamey Habtu
- Merit Health Leadership Academy, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Robert Hobbs
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yi Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
| | | | - Daniel Y Song
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Donath E, Alcaidinho A, Delouya G, Taussky D. The one hundred most cited publications in prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:611-623. [PMID: 33674184 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study is to identify the leaders in research on prostate brachytherapy through a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited publications in the field. METHODS AND MATERIALS A broad search was performed with the term "prostate brachytherapy" using the Web of Science database to generate wide-ranging results that were reviewed by reading the abstracts and, if necessary, the articles to select the top 100 most cited publications. RESULTS The median of the total citation count was 187 (range 132-1464). The median citation per year index (citations/year since publication) was 13.5 (range 6.3-379.0). In all publications, the first author was also the corresponding author. The top publishing countries of the first author included the United States (n = 78), Canada (n = 6), the UK (n = 5), and Germany (n = 4). The journal with the most publications was the International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics (n = 38). There were 27 more publications on low-dose-rate (LDR) than on high-dose-rate (HDR) (43 vs 16) among the top 100. HDR publications had only one first author that had three articles in comparison to LDR publications, which had four first authors, each with three articles on LDR. The United States was the leading country in 43.8% of HDR publications (n = 7) and 88.4% of LDR publications (n = 38). CONCLUSIONS Our bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited publications clearly demonstrates the North American dominance in the publications of prostate brachytherapy, especially in LDR. However, European first authors were more frequent in HDR publications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisheva Donath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alexandre Alcaidinho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Guila Delouya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Daniel Taussky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Focal low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2021; 12:554-561. [PMID: 33437303 PMCID: PMC7787206 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2020.101688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To prospectively investigate the efficacy and feasibility of focal low-dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Material and methods Between October 2014 and May 2019, nineteen low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients who presented with abnormality on both diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) underwent focal LDR brachytherapy at our institution. Focal gross tumor volume (F-GTV) was delineated on transrectal ultrasound, based on abnormality seen on fused T2-weighted MRI. F-GTV was expanded by 5 mm, as a safety margin, to create focal clinical target volume (F-CTV). Prescribed dose to F-CTV was 145 Gy. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was determined using Phoenix criterion (prostate specific antigen nadir + 2 ng/ml). Pre- and post-implant dosimetry data were compared using non-parametric Wilcoxon’s rank sum test. Treatment-related toxicities were evaluated using common terminology criteria for adverse events. Results Mean F-CTV D90% was significantly lower in the post-implant evaluation than in intraoperative planning (p = 0.004). On post-implant dosimetry, the mean D90% for F-GTV and mean V100% for the entire prostate were 222 Gy and 35%, respectively. Median follow-up time for all patients was 31 months. BCR occurred in one patient after 23 months. Kaplan-Meier 2-year BCR-free rate was 92.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.4-100%). No patients had grade 1 or greater gastrointestinal toxicity. Three patients who were taking α-blockers to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (present before brachytherapy), experienced no treatment-related genitourinary toxicities. Two patients suffered from temporary grade 2 urinary frequency. None of the remaining patients experienced grade 2 or higher genitourinary toxicity. Conclusions Focal LDR prostate brachytherapy appears acceptable for MRI-based index tumors, with a low cumulative incidence of BCR. Such brachytherapy might offer a feasible minimally invasive therapeutic option for localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
20
|
Ta MH, Nunes-Silva I, Barret E, Renard-Penna R, Rozet F, Mombet A, Cathala N, Sanchez-Salas R, Créhange G, Cathelineau X, Cosset JM. Focal Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Midterm Outcomes. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 11:e477-e485. [PMID: 33422681 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Focal brachytherapy (F-BT) is a suitable technique for focal therapy in localized prostate cancer. It has the ability to adapt the seed implantation to the volume and location of the tumor. The aim of this study was to assess F-BT oncologic, functional, and toxicity midterm outcomes in men who underwent prostate cancer treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS The study included 39 men with low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with F-BT between 2010 and 2015. The dose prescription was 145 Gy. Failure was defined as the presence of any residual prostate cancer in the treated area. The primary and secondary endpoints were the F-BT oncologic and functional outcomes, respectively. A 2-sided P value < .05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS The mean follow-up time was 65 months (range, 43-104 months). After 24 months, 34 patients underwent control biopsies and 5 patients refused. The biopsies were negative in 27 cases (79%) and positive in 7 cases (21%), all outside the volume treated. Biochemical relapse-free survival at 5 years, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 96.8% ± 0.032%, 79.5% ± 0.076%, and 100%, respectively. The mean International Prostate Symptom Score at 2 months was significantly higher than initially (P = .0003), with no significant difference later. No late urinary, sexual, or rectal toxicity was observed. Salvage treatment was possible with good tolerance at 3.4 years of follow-up. Limitations of this study include the retrospective nature and lack of randomization. CONCLUSIONS F-BT is a safe and effective treatment for selected patients presenting with low- or intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minh-Hanh Ta
- Radiotherapy Department, SNC Charlebourg, Amethyst Group, La Garenne-Colombes, France
| | - Igor Nunes-Silva
- Urology Department, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Urology Department, Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho Cancer Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Eric Barret
- Urology Department, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
| | | | - François Rozet
- Urology Department, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Annick Mombet
- Urology Department, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Nathalie Cathala
- Urology Department, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | - Gilles Créhange
- Urology Department, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Oncology/Radiotherapy Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | - Jean-Marc Cosset
- Radiotherapy Department, SNC Charlebourg, Amethyst Group, La Garenne-Colombes, France; Urology Department, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Oncology/Radiotherapy Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
A comparison of treatment planning techniques for low-dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:410-419. [PMID: 33234407 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans created using three retrospectively applied planning techniques with plans delivered to patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS Treatment plans were created retrospectively on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) scans for 26 patients. The technique dubbed 4D Brachytherapy was applied, using TRUS and MRI to obtain prostatic measurements required for the associated webBXT online nomogram. Using a patient's MRI scan to create a treatment plan involving loose seeds was also explored. Plans delivered to patients were made using an intraoperative loose seed TRUS-based planning technique. Prostate V100 (%), prostate V150 (%), prostate D90 (Gy), rectum D0.1cc (Gy), rectum D2cc (Gy), urethra D10 (%), urethra D30 (%), and prostate volumes were measured for each patient. Statistical analysis was used to assess and compare plans. RESULTS Prostate volumes measured by TRUS and MRI were significantly different. Prostate volumes calculated by the webBXT online nomogram using TRUS- and MRI-based measurements were not significantly different. Compared with delivered plans, TRUS-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed significantly lower rectum D0.1cc (Gy) values, MRI-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed significantly higher prostate V100 (%) values and significantly lower rectum D0.1cc (Gy), urethra D10 (%), and urethra D30 (%) values, and loose seed MRI-based plans showed significantly lower prostate V100 (%), prostate D90 (Gy), rectum D0.1cc (Gy), rectum D2cc (Gy), urethra D10 (%), and urethra D30 (%) values. CONCLUSIONS TRUS-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed similar dosimetry to delivered plans; rectal dosimetry was superior. MRI can be integrated into the 4D Brachytherapy workflow. The webBXT online nomogram overestimates the required number of seeds.
Collapse
|
22
|
Lamb DS, Greig L, FitzJohn T, Russell GL, Nacey JN, Iupati D, Woods L. Relapse patterns after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:291-295. [PMID: 33158775 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE When biochemical failure (BF) develops after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy, the relapse site is frequently not found. We set out to find whether prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography -CT (PSMA PET-CT) scanning has improved knowledge of relapse patterns. METHODS AND MATERIALS A database was analyzed, which contained information and long-term followup on 903 men who had an iodine-125 seed implant as monotherapy for early-stage prostate cancer. There was a total of 68 BFs. RESULT In 38 men developing BF before PSMA PET-CT scanning was available, the site of relapse was local in six, distant in twelve, and unknown in twenty. In 30 men developing BF more recently who had a PSMA PET-CT scan, the relapse site was demonstrated in all cases, and 19 (63%) men had relapsed at the prostate base. Radiation dosimetry of base relapses and paired controls demonstrated that implants routinely delivered a lower radiation dose to the base than to the rest of the prostate. Eight of seventeen cases found to have prostate relapse only underwent salvage prostatectomy. CONCLUSION PSMA PET-CT scanning is highly effective in demonstrating the relapse site(s) when BF develops after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Knowledge of the relapse site increases management options for men developing BF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S Lamb
- School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand; Radiation Oncology, Southern Cross Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.
| | - Lynne Greig
- Medical Physics, Southern Cross Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Trevor FitzJohn
- PET/CT Unit, Pacific Radiology Bowen Centre, Wellington, New Zealand
| | | | - John N Nacey
- Department of Surgery, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Douglas Iupati
- Radiation Oncology, Southern Cross Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Lisa Woods
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Low dose rate permanent seed brachytherapy: tracing its evolution and current status. PRECISION RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/pro6.1096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
24
|
Pons-Llanas O, Burgos-Burgos J, Roldan-Ortega S, Conde-Moreno A, Celada-Alvarez F, Ruiz-Martinez JC, Lliso-Valverde F, Tormo-Micó A, Perez-Calatayud J, López-Torrecilla J. Salvage I-125 brachytherapy for locally-recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:754-759. [PMID: 32684865 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Retrospective, single-institution analysis of clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicity in patients treated with salvage I-125 low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy (BT) for locally-recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy. Materials and methods Between 2008 and 2018, 30 patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer recurrence underwent salvage treatment with I-125 LDR-BT. Of these 30 patients, 14 were previously treated with primary external beam radiotherapy (EBRT; median dose, 73 Gy) and 16 with primary I-125 LDR-BT (145 Gy and 160 Gy in 14 and 2 cases, respectively). At seed implantation, the mean age was 75.8 years, with a median Gleason score of 7 and pre-salvage PSA of <10 ng/mL. Six patients received androgen deprivation therapy for six months after relapse diagnosis. The prescribed salvage I-125 BT dose to the gland was 120-130 Gy, with dose restrictions of Dmax <135% (urethra) and <100% (rectum). Toxicity was evaluated according to the CTCAE scale (v4.0). Results At a median follow-up of 45 months, the biochemical recurrence-free survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 86.7%, 56.7% and 53.3%, respectively. Overall survival at 5 years was 87%. On the multivariate analysis, two variables were significant predictors of recurrence: PSA at relapse and nadir PSA post-salvage. Grade 3 genitourinary toxicity was observed in 5 patients (radiation-induced cystitis in 3 cases and urethral stenosis in 2) and G3 gastrointestinal toxicity in 3 patients (rectal bleeding). Conclusion Salvage therapy with I-125 brachytherapy is a safe and effective treatment option for locally-recurrent prostate cancer in previously-irradiated patients. High pre-salvage PSA and post-salvage nadir PSA values were significantly associated with a worse disease control after salvage I-125 LDR-BT. In well-selected patients, I-125 LDR-BT is comparable to other salvage therapies in terms of disease control and toxicity. However, more research is needed to determine the optimal management of locally-recurrent prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Pons-Llanas
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia Spain
| | - J Burgos-Burgos
- Radiotherapy Department, Hospital, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - S Roldan-Ortega
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia Spain
| | - A Conde-Moreno
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia Spain
| | - F Celada-Alvarez
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia Spain
| | - J C Ruiz-Martinez
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia Spain
| | - F Lliso-Valverde
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia Spain
| | - A Tormo-Micó
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia Spain
| | - J Perez-Calatayud
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Salembier C, De Hertogh O, Daisne JF, Palumbo S, Van Gestel D. Brachytherapy in Belgium in 2018. A national survey of the brachytherapy study group of the Belgian SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (BeSTRO). Radiother Oncol 2020; 150:245-252. [PMID: 32679309 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the current practices patterns and evaluate the actual brachytherapy (BT) resources in Belgium. MATERIAL AND METHODS In 2019, the Brachytherapy Study Group proposed to conduct a survey on behalf of the Belgian SocieTy of Radiation Oncology (BeSTRO) in order to identify current BT practice patterns. An electronic questionnaire was sent to all primary radiotherapy centers in Belgium. This questionnaire was based on the questionnaire that was used by the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO) in 2016, asking for: (a) General information on the Radiation Oncology Centre; (b) BT equipment and human resources; (c) BT procedures; (d) BT assessment (number of patients treated annually, treated sites, and different modalities of treatments). RESULTS All 24 radiation oncology centers (100% response rate) answered the questionnaire and gave also information on the performance of brachytherapy in their (eventual) satellite centers. Eighteen (18) BT afterloader units were installed and operational in 2018. Thirteen centers mentioned a prostate seed implant program, one center a prostate and eye plaque program and one center only an eye plaque program. Less than 50% of centers have the infrastructure to offer the full-range of BT in their own department. In 2018, 1486 patients received a BT-treatment, 28% of them were treated by prostate seed implant, 8% were treated by eye-(seed) BT and 64% by high dose rate (HDR)/pulsed dose rate (PDR) BT. Forty-five percent of HDR/PDR patients were treated by vaginal dome BT, 22% by intra-uterine BT, 11% by skin BT, 10% by breast BT (almost exclusively in one centre), 8% for benign pathology (keloid) and the remaining 4% were treated for prostate (as a boost or as salvage in one centre), anal, penile, lung or oesophageal cancer. CONCLUSIONS Belgian radiotherapy departments often perform BT only in a (highly) selected group of pathologies, resulting in a limited number of patients treated by this technique despite the sufficient availability of BT equipment. Modern indications are often not covered, hence patients do not have regular access to recognized treatment options, possibly leading to inferior oncological outcome. BeSTRO will use the results of this survey to stimulate improvements in training, awareness, education, implementation, collaboration and cooperation in the field of brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Olivier De Hertogh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHR Verviers East Belgium, Verviers, Belgium
| | | | - Samuel Palumbo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU UCL Namur - Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium
| | - Dirk Van Gestel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet - Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pons-Llanas O, Collado-Ballesteros E, Roldan-Ortega S, Conde-Moreno A, Celada-Alvarez F, Martínez-Arcelus F, Pérez-Calatayud MJ, Carmona-Meseguer V, Gimeno-Olmos J, Forner-Ferrer V, Tormo-Micó A, Perez-Calatayud J, López-Torrecilla J. Impact of real-time, dose-escalated permanent seed implant brachytherapy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:463-469. [PMID: 32494221 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To retrospectively evaluate biochemical control and toxicity in patients who underwent 125I seed brachytherapy (BT) for intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and Methods Between January 2004-December 2014, 395 patients with intermediate-risk PCa underwent 125I BT. Of these, 117 underwent preoperative planning (PP; 145 Gy) and 278 real-time intraoperative preplanning (IoP; 160 Gy). All patients were followed for ≥ 6 months (> 5 years in 48% of patients and > 7 years in 13%). Median follow-up was 59 months. Results Biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) rates at 5 and 8 years were, respectively, 91.7% and 82.1%. By treatment group, the corresponding BRFS rates were 93.5% and 90% for IoP and 89% and 76.8% for PP. The maximum dose to the urethra remained unchanged (217 Gy) despite the dose escalation (from 145 to 160 Gy), without any significant increase in treatment-related toxicity (p = 0.13). Overall toxicity outcomes in the series were excellent, with only 3 cases (0.76%) of grade 3 genitourinary toxicity. Conclusion The real-time intraoperative planning technique at 160 Gy yields better biochemical controls than the preoperative planning technique at 145 Gy. Dose escalation did not increase urinary toxicity. The excellent results obtained with the IoP BT technique support its use as the first treatment option in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Pons-Llanas
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain
| | - E Collado-Ballesteros
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain
| | - S Roldan-Ortega
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain
| | - A Conde-Moreno
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain
| | - F Celada-Alvarez
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain
| | - F Martínez-Arcelus
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain
| | - M J Pérez-Calatayud
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain
| | - V Carmona-Meseguer
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain
| | - J Gimeno-Olmos
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain
| | - V Forner-Ferrer
- Biostatistics Unity, Medical Research Institute La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - A Tormo-Micó
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain
| | - J Perez-Calatayud
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kobayashi K, Murakami N, Takahashi K, Inaba K, Igaki H, Hamamoto R, Itami J. A Population-based Statistical Model for Investigating Heterogeneous Intraprostatic Sensitivity to Radiation Toxicity After 125I Seed Implantation. In Vivo 2020; 33:2103-2111. [PMID: 31662544 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Revised: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
AIM To develop a population-based statistical model in order to find a spatial pattern of dose distribution which is related to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 75 patients underwent 125I seed implantation for prostate cancer. Principal component analysis was applied to the standardized dose array and for each patient dose distribution was uniquely characterized by a combination of weighted eigenvectors. The correlation between eigenvectors and the severity of LUTS was investigated with linear regression analysis. RESULTS Eight eigenvectors were identified as being significantly associated with the severity of LUTS (p<0.05). Multivariate regression model identified that intraprostatic parameters, which were positively associated with the severity of LUTS, were distributed around a portion of the urethral base and a peripheral region of the prostate. CONCLUSION We established a population-based statistical model that may indicate a significant dose pattern associated with the severity of radiation toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuma Kobayashi
- Division of Molecular Modification and Cancer Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan .,Cancer Translational Research Team, RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of NCC Cancer Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoya Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kana Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Inaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Igaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryuji Hamamoto
- Division of Molecular Modification and Cancer Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.,Cancer Translational Research Team, RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of NCC Cancer Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Itami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
A history of transurethral resection of the prostate should not be a contra-indication for low-dose-rate 125I prostate brachytherapy: results of a prospective Uro-GEC phase-II trial. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2020; 12:1-5. [PMID: 32190063 PMCID: PMC7073343 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2020.92913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Early reports suggested that transurethral resection (TURP) prior to permanent seed brachytherapy (BT) results in high incontinence rates. Guidelines consider prior TURP as a contra-indication to treatment, but improvements in imaging and treatment planning may reduce this risk, and are investigated in this prospective study. Material and methods 99 men with histologically proven low- to intermediate-risk, localized prostate cancer, with a history of TURP performed at least 3 months before BT procedure were enrolled. All patients received a permanent seed implant between March 2009 and June 2015. Intra-operative interactive planning was recommended to ensure optimal accuracy of seed placement during the procedure. No supplemental external beam was allowed. Target and organ at risk contouring, definition of clinical target volume (CTV), and dosimetric parameters followed the modified GEC-ESTRO guidelines for permanent seed implants, as described an earlier report of our group. Follow-up was scheduled every 3 months for the first year, and every 6 months afterwards, with minimum follow-up of 2 years. Study endpoints The primary endpoint was the incidence of post-implant urinary incontinence. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of urinary and gastro-intestinal toxicity, the eventual impact on the sexual function, and the freedom from biochemical failure. Results The median follow-up time for these 99 patients was 49 months (min. 24, max. 96). In this series, the incontinence rate was 2% after TURP + BT and 2% in case of TURP + BT + re-TURP, ending up with a total urinary incontinence rate of 4%. Acute and late urinary toxicities were extremely low. No significant late gastro-intestinal toxicity was seen, and the 5-year biochemical non-evidence of disease (bNED) was 93%. Conclusions The excellent long-term results and low morbidity presented as well as many advantages of prostate brachytherapy over other treatments demonstrates that brachytherapy is an effective treatment for patients with transurethral resection and organ-confined prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
29
|
Viktorin-Baier P, Putora PM, Schmid HP, Plasswilm L, Schwab C, Thoeni A, Hochreiter W, Prikler L, Suter S, Stucki P, Müntener M, Blick N, Schiefer H, Güsewell S, Zürn K, Engeler D. Long-term oncological and functional follow-up in low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: results from the prospective nationwide Swiss registry. BJU Int 2020; 125:827-835. [PMID: 31965694 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the long-term oncological, functional and toxicity outcomes of low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) in relation to risk factors and radiation dose in a prospective multicentre cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data of patients from 12 Swiss centres undergoing LDR-BT from September 2004 to March 2018 were prospectively collected. Patients with a follow-up of ≥3 months were analysed. Functional and oncological outcomes were assessed at ~6 weeks, 6 and 12 months after implantation and annually thereafter. LDR-BT was performed with 125 I seeds. Dosimetry was done 6 weeks after implantation based on the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology recommendations. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS). A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rise above the PSA nadir + 2 was defined as biochemical failure. Functional outcomes were assessed by urodynamic measurement parameters and questionnaires. RESULTS Of 1580 patients in the database, 1291 (81.7%) were evaluable for therapy outcome. The median (range) follow-up was 37.1 (3.0-141.6) months. Better BRFS was found for Gleason score ≤3+4 (P = 0.03, log-rank test) and initial PSA level of <10 ng/mL (P < 0.001). D'Amico Risk groups were significantly associated with BRFS (P < 0.001), with a hazard ratio of 2.38 for intermediate- and high-risk patients vs low-risk patients. The radiation dose covering 90% of the prostate volume (D90) after 6 weeks was significantly lower in patients with recurrence. Functional outcomes returned close to baseline levels after 2-3 years. A major limitation of these findings is a substantial loss to follow-up. CONCLUSION Our results are in line with other studies showing that LDR-BT is associated with good oncological outcomes together with good functional results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Viktorin-Baier
- Department of Urology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.,Urology Clinic, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Paul M Putora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Hans-Peter Schmid
- Department of Urology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Ludwig Plasswilm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Schwab
- Department of Urology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Armin Thoeni
- Clinic for Radiation-Oncology, Lindenhof Hospital Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Patrick Stucki
- Urology Clinic, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Nadja Blick
- Urology Clinic, Triemli Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hans Schiefer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Sabine Güsewell
- Clinical Trial Unit, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Karin Zürn
- Department of Urology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Engeler
- Department of Urology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Prostate Brachytherapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-0073-2_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
31
|
Safety and efficacy of CT-guided radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation assisted by a 3D printing template for the treatment of thoracic malignancies. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2019; 146:229-236. [PMID: 31630263 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-019-03050-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To ascertain the safety and efficacy of radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation (RISI) for the treatment of thoracic tumors. METHODS Clinical patients with primary or metastatic tumors in the chest treated with RISI were analyzed. The RISI process included the following stages: preoperative planning, template design and 3D printing, CT-guided RISI assisted by a template, and postoperative dosimetric verification. The prescribed dose was ≥ 80 Gy. The main analytic measures were the local control (LC) rate and toxicity. RESULTS From April 2015 to July 2018, a total of 92 patients, including 41 with lung cancer and 51 with lung metastases, were analyzed. The median lesion diameter was 5 cm. The median postoperative D90 was 142.6 Gy. The median follow-up was 10.7 months. The overall survival rates at 1 year and 3 years were 59.7% and 22.2%, respectively. The LC rates at 1 year and 3 years were 64.9% and 32.8%, respectively. The LC rates at 3 years for patients with D90 < 140 Gy and D90 > 140 Gy were 23.1% and 54.3%, respectively (P = 0.014). The LC rate of metastatic lung cancer was more favorable than that of primary lung cancer. The multivariate analyses showed that the dose and lesion type were independent factors for LC (P < 0.05). No factors were related to OS. The incidence of pneumothorax and hemoptysis was 35.8% and 3.2%, respectively. Few cases of radiotherapy-related toxicity effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS RISI may be safe and efficacious and is associated with few complications during the treatment of thoracic tumors. If patients need local treatment and surgery or radiotherapy is not available, RISI could be considered.
Collapse
|
32
|
Ji Z, Jiang Y, Guo F, Peng R, Sun H, Wang P, Fan J, Wang J. Radiation-related Adverse Effects of CT-guided Implantation of 125I Seeds for Thoracic Recurrent and/or Metastatic Malignancy. Sci Rep 2019; 9:14803. [PMID: 31616052 PMCID: PMC6794248 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51458-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
During radioactive Iodine-125 seed implantation (RISI), Iodine-125 radionuclide is implanted directly into a lesion and kills tumor cells by steadily emitting radiation. In our study, we analyzed the adverse effects of RISI for thoracic malignancy, and investigated the safety, dosage, and adverse effects of RISI for these cases. Between June 2007 and January 2018, 77 patients with thoracic recurrent and/or metastatic tumors who underwent CT-guided RISI were enrolled. Radiation-related adverse effects were analyzed, including pneumonia, esophagitis, hemorrhage, fistula, skin injury, heart injury, and spinal cord injury. We used the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 to evaluate adverse effects and analyzed the relationship between adverse effects and dosimetric parameters of organs at risk (OAR), including D0.1cc, D2cc, Dmean, and V20. The results of the study were as follows: The median follow-up period was 11 months. The median postoperative dose (D90) was 122 Gy (45.7–241.8 Gy). Three patients (3.9%) showed radiation pneumonitis of grade ≥2. Two patients (2.6%) showed radiation-induced esophagitis of grade ≥2. One patient (1.3%) showed an esophageal fistula. Two patients (2.6%) had a tracheal fistula. Five patients (6.5%) had radiation-related skin reactions. One patient (1.3%) reported chest wall pain, while three (3.9%) showed hemoptysis. No patients showed radiation myelitis or cardiotoxicity. The mean D2cc of organs at risk were 165.7 Gy (lung), 10.61 Gy (esophagus), 10.25 Gy (trachea), 18.07 Gy (blood vessel), 12.64 Gy (heart), 14.77 Gy (spinal cord), 17.47 Gy (skin). Dosimetric parameters, such as D0.1cc, D2cc and Dmean, were higher in patients with toxic reactions (above the upper limit of 95% confidence interval among the overall data). Chi-square test showed that skin D0.1cc > 600 Gy, D2cc > 500 Gy, and Dmean >90 Gy were associated with grade ≥2 radiation dermatitis (p < 0.05), but no clear dose-toxicity correlation was found in other OARs. So, we concluded that the overall incidence of toxicity and adverse effects from RISI for the treatment of thoracic tumors is low. The dose-toxicity characteristics have not been fully defined. Doses within the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval may be considered safe. This was a retrospective analysis, and follow-up period was minimal, indicating possible limitations of this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Ji
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yuliang Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Fuxin Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ran Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Haitao Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Panfeng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jinghong Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Junjie Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Brachytherapy for the urologist: A multidisciplinary team update for 2019. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY 2019. [DOI: 10.1177/2051415819841703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Brachytherapy is a well-established treatment for localised prostate cancer. Urologists are often tasked with discussing all available treatment options with the newly diagnosed patient. Unlike radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy, knowledge of brachytherapy may be limited. The aim of this article is to provide an up-to-date guide on patient selection, modern brachytherapy techniques and the management of side effects, such that the core urologist can be more confident in both discussing initial treatment options and the long-term management of brachytherapy patients. Level of Evidence: Level 5 - review article
Collapse
|
34
|
Karimi D, Zeng Q, Mathur P, Avinash A, Mahdavi S, Spadinger I, Abolmaesumi P, Salcudean SE. Accurate and robust deep learning-based segmentation of the prostate clinical target volume in ultrasound images. Med Image Anal 2019; 57:186-196. [PMID: 31325722 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Revised: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The goal of this work was to develop a method for accurate and robust automatic segmentation of the prostate clinical target volume in transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images for brachytherapy. These images can be difficult to segment because of weak or insufficient landmarks or strong artifacts. We devise a method, based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), that produces accurate segmentations on easy and difficult images alike. We propose two strategies to achieve improved segmentation accuracy on difficult images. First, for CNN training we adopt an adaptive sampling strategy, whereby the training process is encouraged to pay more attention to images that are difficult to segment. Secondly, we train a CNN ensemble and use the disagreement among this ensemble to identify uncertain segmentations and to estimate a segmentation uncertainty map. We improve uncertain segmentations by utilizing the prior shape information in the form of a statistical shape model. Our method achieves Hausdorff distance of 2.7 ± 2.3 mm and Dice score of 93.9 ± 3.5%. Comparisons with several competing methods show that our method achieves significantly better results and reduces the likelihood of committing large segmentation errors. Furthermore, our experiments show that our approach to estimating segmentation uncertainty is better than or on par with recent methods for estimation of prediction uncertainty in deep learning models. Our study demonstrates that estimation of model uncertainty and use of prior shape information can significantly improve the performance of CNN-based medical image segmentation methods, especially on difficult images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davood Karimi
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Qi Zeng
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Prateek Mathur
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Apeksha Avinash
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Purang Abolmaesumi
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Septimiu E Salcudean
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Perez-Calatayud J, Ballester F, Carlsson Tedgren Å, Rijnders A, Rivard MJ, Andrássy M, Niatsetski Y, Schneider T, Siebert FA. GEC-ESTRO ACROP recommendations on calibration and traceability of LE-LDR photon-emitting brachytherapy sources at the hospital level. Radiother Oncol 2019; 135:120-129. [PMID: 31015157 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 02/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Prostate brachytherapy treatment using permanent implantation of low-energy (LE) low-dose rate (LDR) sources is successfully and widely applied in Europe. In addition, seeds are used in other tumour sites, such as ophthalmic tumours, implanted temporarily. The calibration issues for LE-LDR photon emitting sources are specific and different from other sources used in brachytherapy. In this report, the BRAPHYQS (BRAchytherapy PHYsics Quality assurance System) working group of GEC-ESTRO, has developed the present recommendations to assure harmonized and high-quality seed calibration in European clinics. There are practical aspects for which a clarification/procedure is needed, including aspects not specifically accounted for in currently existing AAPM and ESTRO societal recommendations. The aim of this report has been to provide a European wide standard in LE-LDR source calibration at end-user level, in order to keep brachytherapy treatments with high safety and quality levels. The recommendations herein reflect the guidance to the ESTRO brachytherapy users and describe the procedures in a clinic or hospital to ensure the correct calibration of LE-LDR seeds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Perez-Calatayud
- Radiotherapy Department, University and Polytechnic La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain; IRIMED Joint Research Unit (IIS La Fe - UV), Valencia, Spain.
| | - Facundo Ballester
- IRIMED Joint Research Unit (IIS La Fe - UV), Valencia, Spain; Departmento of Atomic, Molecular and Nuclear Physics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Åsa Carlsson Tedgren
- Radiation Physics, Department of Medicine and Health (IMH), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Section of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering, Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alex Rijnders
- Department of Radiotherapy, Europe Hospitals, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mark J Rivard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA
| | | | - Yury Niatsetski
- R&D Elekta Brachytherapy Waardgelder 1, Veenendaal, Netherlands
| | - Thorsten Schneider
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Department of Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Frank-André Siebert
- UK S-H, Campus Kiel, Klinik für Strahlentherapie (Radioonkologie), Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
The role of radiotherapy in localised and locally advanced prostate cancer. Asian J Urol 2019; 6:153-161. [PMID: 31061801 PMCID: PMC6488693 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 12/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
For a patient suffering from non-metastatic prostate cancer, the individualized recommendation of radiotherapy has to be the fruit of a multidisciplinary approach in the context of a Tumor Board, to be explained carefully to the patient to obtain his informed consent. External beam radiotherapy is now delivered by intensity modulated radiotherapy, considered as the gold standard. From a radiotherapy perspective, low-risk localized prostate cancer is treated by image guided intensity modulated radiotherapy, or brachytherapy if patients meet the required eligibility criteria. Intermediate-risk patients may benefit from intensity modulated radiotherapy combined with 4–6 months of androgen deprivation therapy; intensity modulated radiotherapy alone or combined with brachytherapy can be offered to patients unsuitable for androgen deprivation therapy due to co-morbidities or unwilling to accept it to preserve their sexual health. High-risk prostate cancer, i.e. high-risk localized and locally advanced prostate cancer, requires intensity modulated radiotherapy with long-term (≥2 years) androgen deprivation therapy with luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists. Post-operative irradiation, either immediate or early deferred, is proposed to patients classified as pT3pN0, based on surgical margins, prostate-specific antigen values and quality of life. Whatever the techniques and their degree of sophistication, quality assurance plays a major role in the management of radiotherapy, requiring the involvement of physicians, physicists, dosimetrists, radiation technologists and computer scientists. The patients must be informed about the potential morbidity of radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy and followed regularly during and after treatment for tertiary prevention and evaluation. A close cooperation is needed with general practitioners and specialists to prevent and mitigate side effects and maintain quality of life.
Collapse
|
37
|
Yan C, Huq MS, Heron DE, Beriwal S, Wynn RB. Correlation between real-time intraoperative and postoperative dosimetry and its implications on intraoperative planning. Brachytherapy 2019; 18:338-347. [PMID: 30655047 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to study the correlation between intraoperative and postimplant dosimetry. We investigated the correlation between prostate (V150) and urethra (D30, D5) dose limits, and whether it is possible to increase prostate D90 and V100 in intraoperative planning without violating postimplant urethra and rectum dose limits. METHODS AND MATERIALS Seventy-nine patients who underwent real-time ultrasound-guided prostate implants using intraoperative planning from 2013 to 2017 were analyzed. Forty-one of the 79 implants were 125I as monotherapy and the remainder was 103Pd as boost to external beam radiation therapy or external beam radiation therapy plus androgen deprivation therapy. Prescriptions followed the guidelines of AAPM TG-137. The urethra was catheterized during intraoperative implantation and postimplant imaging to facilitate the urethra identification. T2-cubed MRI and CT were acquired on the same day and about 1 month after the low-dose-rate procedure, and MRI was later fused with the CT scan for accurate delineation of the prostate and postimplant dosimetry evaluation. An institutionally based peer-review process and document procedure were established based on national recommendations. Correlation of dose parameters: D90, V150, V100 of prostate, D30, D5 of urethra, and V100 of rectum between intraoperative and postimplant plans were evaluated. RESULTS D90 and V100 declined for all implants between intraoperative and postimplant dosimetry. On average, D90 declined by 17.5% and 21.7% for 125I and 103Pb implants, respectively. V100 declined for all implants between intraoperative and postimplant dosimetry but less pronounced. Prostate V150 and urethra D30 and D5 also showed different tendency of decline. Of the 79 implants, 60 did not meet the postimplant dosimetry target for prostate (V150 ≤ 50%), and 46 of the 60 implants met the optimal dosimetry targets for both D30 (<125%) and D5 (<150%), and the other 14 of the 60 implants failed to meet either the D30 or the D5 limits. All the implants met the postimplant target dose for rectum: V100≤ 1.3 cc. CONCLUSION Intraoperative implant dosimetry could not accurately predict postimplant dosimetry; however, to avoid underdosage of prostate, intraoperative D90 should be close to 120% of prescribed dose and V100 needs to be close to 100% of prescribed dose. Prostate V150> 50% does not necessarily indicate the violation of urethra D30 and D5 dose limits. For most of the implants, target intraoperative D90 and V100 could be raised without violating urethra D30 and D5 limits recommended by American Brachytherapy Society in postimplant evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenyu Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
| | - M Saiful Huq
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Dwight E Heron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Raymond B Wynn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Institutional patient accrual volume and the treatment quality of I‑125 prostate seed implantation in a Japanese nationwide prospective cohort study. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 195:412-419. [PMID: 30519730 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1407-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2018] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is unclear whether experience at high-volume institute improves the treatment quality of prostate seed implantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of institutional experience on postimplant dosimetric parameters in a nationwide prospective cohort study. METHODS From July 2005 to June 2007, 2354 patients were registered in the Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent I‑125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS), and 1126 patients treated with seed implantation alone were evaluated. As a surrogate for institutional experience, we classified the J‑POPS institutions as high-volume (patient accrual volume was ≥120 patients per institution) or low-volume institutions (patient accrual volume was <120 patients per institution). To compare treatment quality between institutions, we evaluated the postimplant dosimetric parameters including D90, V100/150 (prostatic dose parameters), UD5/90, U200 (urethral dose parameters), and rectum R100/150 (rectal dose parameters). RESULTS In the 5 high-volume institutions (n = 601 patients), most of the patients were treated with >144 Gy of D90, whereas in the 20 low-volume institutions (n = 525) some of the patients were treated with <144 Gy. The V100 of most of the high-volume institution patients were >90%, whereas in the low-volume institutions a considerable percentage of patients showed lower V100. Although there was no correlation between D90 and rectal dose parameters, UD90 had a moderate positive correlation with D90 in both the high- and low-volume institutions. U200 varied more widely in the low-volume institutions. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that the institutional patient accrual volume is associated with the treatment quality of I‑125 prostate seed implantation.
Collapse
|
39
|
Nosrati R, Soliman A, Safigholi H, Hashemi M, Wronski M, Morton G, Pejović-Milić A, Stanisz G, Song WY. MRI-based automated detection of implanted low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy seeds using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and unsupervised machine learning (ML). Radiother Oncol 2018; 129:540-547. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2017] [Revised: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
40
|
Salembier C, Villeirs G, De Bari B, Hoskin P, Pieters BR, Van Vulpen M, Khoo V, Henry A, Bossi A, De Meerleer G, Fonteyne V. ESTRO ACROP consensus guideline on CT- and MRI-based target volume delineation for primary radiation therapy of localized prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127:49-61. [PMID: 29496279 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Revised: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Delineation of clinical target volumes (CTVs) remains a weak link in radiation therapy (RT), and large inter-observer variation is seen. Guidelines for target and organs at risk delineation for prostate cancer in the primary setting are scarce. The aim was to develop a delineation guideline obtained by consensus between a broad European group of radiation oncologists. MATERIAL AND METHODS An ESTRO contouring consensus panel consisting of leading radiation oncologists and one radiologist with known subspecialty expertise in prostate cancer was asked to delineate the prostate, seminal vesicles and rectum on co-registered CT and MRI scans. After evaluation of the different contours, literature review and multiple informal discussions by electronic mail a CTV definition was defined and a guide for contouring the CTV of the prostate and the rectum was developed. RESULTS The panel achieved consensus CTV contouring definitions to be used as guideline for primary RT of localized prostate cancer. CONCLUSION The ESTRO consensus on CT/MRI based CTV delineation for primary RT of localized prostate cancer, endorsed by a broad base of the radiation oncology community, is presented to improve consistency and reliability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Belgium
| | - Geert Villeirs
- Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | | | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Van Vulpen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ann Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
D'hulst P, Mattelaer P, Darras J, Staelens L, Pottel H, Ponette D. Low-dose-rate brachytherapy as a minimally invasive curative treatment for localised prostate cancer has excellent oncological and functional outcomes: a retrospective analysis from a single centre. Cent European J Urol 2018; 71:270-275. [PMID: 30386646 PMCID: PMC6202624 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2018.1749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Revised: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy is a widely used therapeutic option for localised prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to analyse the oncological and functional outcomes after 10 years of experience with brachytherapy for localised prostate cancer. Material and methods All patients who underwent brachytherapy between April 2006 and September 2017 were included for analysis. Initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, tumour stages, Gleason scores, positive biopsies, prostate volumes, dosimetric parameters, and urinary symptoms were noted. Results A total of 201 patients underwent brachytherapy between April 2006 and September 2017. Of these patients, 159 had >3 years of oncological and functional follow-up. Only these relevant patients were included in the statistical analysis. This showed a significant, persistent decline in PSA levels (p <0.0001): the mean PSA was 1.2 ng/ml after 6 months, 1.1 ng/ml after 1 year, and 0.49 ng/ml after 3 years. Only 9 patients had tumour recurrence (3 patients with Gleason score 6 and 6 patients with Gleason score 7). After receiving adequate treatment, the patients underwent oncological follow-up. Important obstructive and irritative complaints were most pronounced during the first 9 months and decreased strongly after 18 months of follow-up. Conclusions LDR brachytherapy has excellent oncological outcomes with limited functional inconveniences that are adequately treatable. Our 10 years' experience shows that brachytherapy is a safe and effective method for the treatment of low-risk localised prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter D'hulst
- Az Damiaan Oostende, Department of Urology, Oostende, Belgium
| | | | - Jochen Darras
- Az Damiaan Oostende, Department of Urology, Oostende, Belgium
| | - Lorenzo Staelens
- AZ Delta Roeselare, Department of Radiation Oncology, Roeselare, Belgium
| | - Hans Pottel
- Catholic University Leuven KULAK, Department of Biostatistics, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Pons-Llanas O, Roldan-Ortega S, Celada-Alvarez F, Perez-Calatayud MJ, Fornes-Ferrer V, Tormo-Micó A, Perez-Calatayud J, López-Torrecilla JL. Permanent seed implant brachytherapy in low-risk prostate cancer: Preoperative planning with 145 Gy versus real-time intraoperative planning with 160 Gy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2018; 23:290-297. [PMID: 30090029 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2017] [Accepted: 06/23/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim The present retrospective study was to compare toxicity and survival outcomes in a group of low-risk PCa patients treated with either the preoperative planning technique (145 Gy) or the real-time IoP technique (160 Gy). Background The two most common permanent seed implantation techniques are preoperative planning (PP) with 145 Gy and real-time intraoperative planning (IoP) with 160 Gy. Although IoP has largely replaced PP at many centres in recent years, few studies have directly compared these two techniques. Materials and methods Retrospective study of 408 patients with low-risk PCa treated with permanent seed implant brachytherapy at our institution between October 2003 and December 2014. Of these, 187 patients were treated with PP at a dose of 145 Gy while 221 received real-time IoP with 160 Gy. Results At a median follow up of 90 months, 5- and 8-year rates of biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) were 94.8% and 86% with the IoP technique versus 90.8% and 83.9%, respectively, with PP. The maximum dose to the urethra was <217 Gy with both techniques. Despite the higher dose, IoP did not cause any significant increase in toxicity (p = 0.11). Conclusions The present study shows that real-time intraoperative brachytherapy at a dose of 160 Gy yield better biochemical control than preoperative planning at 145 Gy. In addition, urinary toxicity did not increase, despite the dose escalation, probably because the dose constraints to the urethra were met despite the increased dose escalation. These findings support the use of real-time IoP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Pons-Llanas
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Susana Roldan-Ortega
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Victoria Fornes-Ferrer
- Biostatistics Unity, Medical Research Institute La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alejandro Tormo-Micó
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - José Perez-Calatayud
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zimmermann JS, Osieka R, Bruns T, Hollberg H, Wiechmann B, Netzbandt O, Sablotny J, Malade M, Heitz M, Bernhardt F, Tiemann J, Wilkens M, Brüske T, Welker U, Heinemann V, Zimmermann P, de la Maza SF, Pfeiffer D, Tauber PR, Thomas D, Moustakis C. Five-year effectiveness of low-dose-rate brachytherapy: comparisons with nomogram predictions in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer presenting significant control of intra- and periprostatic disease. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10:297-305. [PMID: 30237813 PMCID: PMC6142645 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.77949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effectiveness of low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer and to compare the outcome with predictions from Kattan and Partin nomograms at 60 months after seed implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS One thousand, one hundred and eighty-seven patients with localized prostate cancer at low-, intermediate-, or high-risk of progression received LDR brachytherapy using iodine-125 seeds with curative intent, applied as monotherapy or in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). At 60 months after seed implantation, data of 1,064 patients (1,058 alive + 6 who died of prostate cancer) were analyzed for biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels using the Phoenix definition. Five-year bPFS probabilities were determined for various risk group classifications (d'Amico, Mt. Sinai, MSKCC/Seattle, NCCN). Outcomes were also compared to patient-individualized nomogram predictions of 5-year bPFS (Kattan 2002) and probability of organ-confined disease (Kattan 2002, Partin 2007). RESULTS Overall, 93.3% (993/1,064) of the patients were free of biochemical progression within 5 years, while the average 5-year bPFS probability according to the Kattan nomogram was significantly lower (85%, p < 0.001). Outcomes were significantly better than Kattan nomogram predictions in the subgroup of patients with monotherapy as well as in patients additionally treated with EBRT. Comparison of the overall outcome with nomogram predictions for organ-confined disease (Kattan nomogram: 50%; Partin nomogram: 65%) revealed a significant probability of LDR brachytherapy to destroy periprostatic tumor spread (p < 0.001) in all risk group constellations, even in high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate high effectiveness of LDR brachytherapy in all risk groups, significantly better than predicted with the Kattan nomogram in most subgroups. The significant superiority of LDR brachytherapy compared to nomogram predictions of organ-confined disease suggests that LDR brachytherapy effectively controls both intra- and periprostatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg S Zimmermann
- Praxis für Brachytherapie, Praxiszentrum Alstertal, Hamburg
- Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Dorothea Thomas
- Praxis für Brachytherapie, Praxiszentrum Alstertal, Hamburg
- Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg
| | - Christos Moustakis
- Praxis für Brachytherapie, Praxiszentrum Alstertal, Hamburg
- Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Abteilung Medizinische Physik, Universitätsklinik Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
UK & Ireland Prostate Brachytherapy Practice Survey 2014-2016. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10:238-245. [PMID: 30038644 PMCID: PMC6052390 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.76839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To document the current prostate brachytherapy practice across the UK and Ireland and compare with previously published audit results. Material and methods Participants from 25 centers attending the annual UK & Ireland Prostate Brachytherapy Conference were invited to complete an online survey. Sixty-three questions assessed the center’s experience and staffing, clinician’s experience, clinical selection criteria and scheduling, number of cases per modality in the preceding three years, low-dose-rate (LDR) pre- and post-implant technique and high-dose-rate (HDR) implant technique. Responses were collated, and descriptive statistical analysis performed. Results Eighteen (72%) centers responded with 17 performing LDR only, 1 performing HDR only, and 6 performing both LDR and HDR. Seventy-one percent of centers have > 10 years of LDR brachytherapy experience, whereas 71% centers that perform HDR brachytherapy have > 5 years of experience. Thirteen centers have 2 or more clinicians performing brachytherapy with 61% of lead consultants performing > 25 cases (LDR + HDR) in 2016. The number of implants (range), that includes LDR and HDR, performed by individual practitioners in 2016 was > 50 by 21%, 25-50 by 38%, and < 25 by 41%. Eight centers reported a decline in LDR monotherapy case numbers in 2016. Number of center’s performing HDR brachytherapy increased in last five years. Relative uniformity in patient selection is noted, and LDR pre- and post-implant dosimetry adheres to published quality guidelines, with an average post-implant D90 of > 145 Gy in 69% of centers in 2014 and 2015 compared to 63% in 2016. The median CT/US volume ratios were > 0.9 ≤ 1.0 (n = 4), > 1.0 ≤ 1.1 (n = 7), and > 1.1 (n = 2). Conclusion There is considerable prostate brachytherapy experience in the UK and Ireland. An apparent fall in LDR case numbers is noted. Maintenance of case numbers and ongoing compliance with published quality guidelines is important to sustain high quality outcomes.
Collapse
|
45
|
Long-term outcome of High-risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Brachytherapy Combined with External-beam Radiation Therapy and Androgen Deprivation Therapy. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/1660.18170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
46
|
New approach of ultra-focal brachytherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer with custom-linked I-125 seeds: A feasibility study of optimal dose coverage. Brachytherapy 2018. [PMID: 29525514 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To present the feasibility study of optimal dose coverage in ultra-focal brachytherapy (UFB) with multiparametric MRI for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS UFB provisional dose plans for small target volumes (<7 cc) were calculated on a prostate training phantom to optimize the seeds number and strength. Clinical UFB consisted in a contour-based nonrigid registration (MRI/Ultrasound) to implant a fiducial marker at the location of the tumor focus. Dosimetry was performed with iodine-125 seeds and a prescribed dose of 160 Gy. On CT scans acquired at 1 month, dose coverage of 152 Gy to the ultra-focal gross tumor volume was evaluated. Registrations between magnetic resonance and CT scans were assessed on the first 8 patients with three software solutions: VariSeed, 3D Slicer, and Mirada, and quantitative evaluations of the registrations were performed. Impact of these registrations on the initial dose matrix was performed. RESULTS Mean differences between simulated dose plans and extrapolated Bard nomogram for UFB volumes were 36.3% (26-56) for the total activity, 18.3% (10-30) for seed strength, and 22.5% (16-38) for number of seeds. Registration method implemented in Mirada performed significantly better than VariSeed and 3D Slicer (p = 0.0117 and p = 0.0357, respectively). For dose plan evaluation between Mirada and VariSeed, D100% (Gy) for ultra-focal gross tumor volume had a mean difference of 28.06 Gy, mean values being still above the objective of 152 Gy. D90% for the prostate had a mean difference of 1.17 Gy. For urethra and rectum, dose limits were far below the recommendations. CONCLUSIONS This UFB study confirmed the possibility to treat with optimal dose coverage target volumes smaller than 7 cc.
Collapse
|
47
|
Graff P, Portalez D, Lusque A, Brun T, Aziza R, Khalifa J, Roumiguié M, Quintyn Ranty ML, Filleron T, Bachaud JM, Malavaud B. IDEAL 2a Phase II Study of Ultrafocal Brachytherapy for Low- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:903-911. [PMID: 29510957 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Revised: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Focal therapy of prostate cancer requires precise positioning of therapeutic agents within well-characterized index tumors (ITs). We assessed the feasibility of low-dose-rate ultrafocal brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS The present study was an institutional review board-approved European Clinical Trials Database-registered phase II protocol. Patients referred (October 2013 to August 2016) for active surveillance (prostate-specific antigen <10 ng/mL, cT1c-cT2a, Gleason score on referring biopsy specimens ≤6 (3+3), ≤3 positive biopsy cores, ≤50% of cancer) were preselected. Inclusion was confirmed when complementary image-guided biopsy findings informed a single Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3, Gleason score ≤7a (3+4) lesion. A ultrasound-visible ancillary marker was positioned within the IT using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) elastic fusion-guided system (Koelis). Ultrafocal transperineal delivery of 125I seeds used classic 2-dimensional TRUS (Bard-FlexFocus) and dose optimization (Variseed Treatment Planning System). Following Simon's optimal design, 17 patients were required to assess the feasibility of delivering ≥95% of the prescribed dose (160 Gy) to the IT (primary objective). Adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) and quality of life (5-item International Index of Erectile Function, International Prostate Symptom Score) were recorded. One-year control biopsy specimens were obtained from the IT and untreated segments. RESULTS Of the 44 preselected patients, 27 did not meet the inclusion criteria. Of the 17 ultrafocal brachytherapy-treated patients, 16 met the primary objective (per protocol success). The prescription dose was delivered to 14.5% ± 6.4% of the prostate volume, resulting in negligible urethral and rectal irradiation and toxicity. No recurrence was evidenced on the 1-year follow-up MRI studies or IT biopsy specimens. Seven nonclinically significant cancers and one Gleason score 7a (3+4) cancer (salvage prostatectomy) were observed in the untreated parenchyma. CONCLUSIONS Recent technology has allowed for selective and effective brachytherapy of small MRI targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Graff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
| | - Daniel Portalez
- Department of Radiology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Amélie Lusque
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Thomas Brun
- Department of Biophysics, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Richard Aziza
- Department of Radiology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Jonathan Khalifa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Mathieu Roumiguié
- Department of Urology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Thomas Filleron
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean-Marc Bachaud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Bernard Malavaud
- Department of Urology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
De Bari B, Fiorentino A, Greto D, Ciammella P, Arcangeli S, Avuzzi B, D'Angelillo RM, Desideri I, Kirienko M, Marchiori D, Massari F, Fundoni C, Franco P, Filippi AR, Alongi F. Prostate cancer as a paradigm of multidisciplinary approach? Highlights from the Italian young radiation oncologist meeting. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 99:637-49. [DOI: 10.1177/030089161309900601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Aims and background The diagnostic and therapeutic approach to prostate cancer has evolved rapidly in last decades. Young professionals need an update about these recent developments in order to improve the care of patients treated in their daily clinical practice. Methods On May 18, 2013, AIRO Giovani (the young section of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) organized a multidisciplinary meeting involving, as speakers, several young physicians from many parts of Italy actively involved in the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to prostate cancer. The meeting was specifically addressed to young physicians (radio-oncologists, urologists, medical oncologists) and presented the state-of-the-art of the diagnostic/therapeutic approach based on the latest evidence on the issue. Highlights of the congress are summarized and presented in this report. Results The large participation in the meeting (more than 120 participants were present) confirmed the interest of young radiation oncologists in improving their skills in prostate cancer management. The contributions of the speakers confirmed the need for regular updates, considering the promising results of recently published studies and the many new ongoing trials, on the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to prostate cancer. Conclusions Multidisciplinary meetings are helpful to improve the skills of young professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berardino De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, AO Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Brescia
| | - Alba Fiorentino
- Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS/CROB, Rionero in Vulture (PZ)
- Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Advanced Technology, Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, IRCCS, Reggio Emilia
| | | | - Barbara Avuzzi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan
| | | | | | | | | | - Francesco Massari
- Medical Oncology, ‘GB Rossi’ Academic Hospital, University of Verona, Verona
| | | | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Radiation Oncology Department, Tomotherapy Unit, Ospedale Regionale U Parini, AUSL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta
| | - Andrea R Filippi
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Torino, Turin
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chiumento C, Montagna A, Clemente S, Cozzolino M, Fusco V. A retrospective analysis after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy with permanent 125I seed implant: clinical and dosimetric results in 70 patients. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 97:335-40. [DOI: 10.1177/030089161109700313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Aims and background To evaluate the biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) rate after 125I permanent-implant prostate brachytherapy. Methods Patients with a diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma and adequate PSA follow-up were selected for this retrospective study. Brachytherapy with permanent 125I seeds was performed as monotherapy, with a prescribed dose of 145 Gy to the prostate. Patients were stratified into recurrence risk groups according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Biochemical failure was defined using the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) guidelines. The post-implant D90 (defined as the minimum dose covering 90% of the prostate) was obtained for each patient. Two cutoff points were used to test the correlation between D90 and bDFS results: 130 Gy and 140 Gy. bDFS was calculated from the implant date to the date of biochemical recurrence. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using the SPSS software and included clinical stage, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score (GS), androgen deprivation therapy, D90, and risk groups. In the univariate analysis we used a cutoff point of 5.89 ng/mL for PSA and 5 for GS. Results From June 2003 to April 2007, 70 patients were analyzed. The patients' distribution into recurrence risk groups was as follows: 39 patients (56%) in the low-risk group, 23 patients (33%) in the intermediate-risk group, and 8 patients (11%) in the high-risk group. At a median follow-up of 47 months (range, 19–70 months) bDFS was 88.4%, with a global actuarial 5-year bDFS of 86%. Disease-related factors including initial PSA level, GS and risk group were significant predictors of biochemical failure (P = 0.01, P = 0.01, P = 0.006, respectively). In multivariate analysis, risk group (P = 0.005) and GS (P = 0.03) were statistically significant. Conclusion Our data are in agreement with those in the literature and, despite the short follow-up, confirm the advantage of brachytherapy for patients at low and intermediate risk of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Costanza Chiumento
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS-CROB, Rionero in Vulture (PZ), Italy
| | - Antonietta Montagna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS-CROB, Rionero in Vulture (PZ), Italy
| | - Stefania Clemente
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS-CROB, Rionero in Vulture (PZ), Italy
| | - Mariella Cozzolino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS-CROB, Rionero in Vulture (PZ), Italy
| | - Vincenzo Fusco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS-CROB, Rionero in Vulture (PZ), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Langley S, Uribe J, Uribe-Lewis S, Money-Kyrle J, Perna C, Khaksar S, Soares R, Laing R. Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Procedural Costs between the Conventional Two-stage Technique and 4D Brachytherapy for Early Prostate Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:57-64. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2017] [Revised: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 09/12/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|