1
|
Armstrong WR, Kishan AU, Booker KM, Grogan TR, Elashoff D, Lam EC, Clark KJ, Steinberg ML, Fendler WP, Hope TA, Nickols NG, Czernin J, Calais J. Impact of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography on Prostate Cancer Salvage Radiotherapy Management: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Randomized Phase 3 Trial (PSMA-SRT NCT03582774). Eur Urol 2024; 86:52-60. [PMID: 38290964 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Both imaging and several prognostic factors inform the planning of salvage radiotherapy (SRT). Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) can localize disease unseen by other imaging modalities. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of PSMA-PET on biochemical recurrence-free survival rate after SRT. METHODS This prospective randomized, controlled, phase 3 clinical trial randomized 193 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy to proceed with SRT (control arm, n = 90) or undergo a PSMA-PET/computed tomography (CT) scan prior to SRT planning (investigational arm, n = 103) from June 2018 to August 2020. Any other approved imaging modalities were allowed in both arms (including fluciclovine-PET). This is a secondary endpoint analysis: impact of PSMA-PET on SRT planning. Case-report forms were sent to referring radiation oncologists to collect the management plans before randomization and after completion of SRT. The relative frequency (%) of management changes within each arm were compared using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS The delivered SRT plan was available in 178/193 patients (92.2%;76/90 control [84.4%] and 102/103 PSMA-PET [99%]). Median prostate-specific antigen levels at enrollment was 0.30 ng/ml (interquartile range [IQR] 0.19-0.91) in the control arm and 0.23 ng/ml (IQR 0.15-0.54) in the PSMA-PET arm. Fluciclovine-PET was used in 33/76 (43%) in the control arm. PSMA-PET localized recurrence(s) in 38/102 (37%): nine of 102 (9%) outside of the pelvis (M1), 16/102 (16%) in the pelvic LNs (N1, with or without local recurrence), and 13/102 (13%) in the prostate fossa only. There was a 23% difference (95% confidence interval [CI] 9-35%, p = 0.002) of frequency of major changes between the control arm (22% [17/76]) and the PSMA-PET intervention arm (45%[46/102]). Of the major changes in the intervention group, 33/46 (72%) were deemed related to PSMA-PET. There was a 17.6% difference (95% CI 5.4-28.5%, p = 0.005) of treatment escalation frequency between the control arm (nine of 76 [12%]) and the intervention arm (30/102 [29%]). Treatment de-escalation occurred in the control and intervention arms in eight of 76 (10.5%) and 12/102 (11.8%) patients, and mixed changes in zero of 76 (0%) and four of 102 (3.9%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS In this prospective randomized phase 3 study, PSMA-PET findings provided information that initiated major management changes to SRT planning in 33/102 (33%) patients. The final readout of the primary endpoint planned in 2025 may provide evidence on whether these changes result in improved outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography leads to management changes in one-third of patients receiving salvage radiotherapy for post-radical prostatectomy biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley R Armstrong
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; UCLA-Caltech Medical Scientist Training Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kiara M Booker
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tristan R Grogan
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core (DOMStat), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - David Elashoff
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core (DOMStat), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ethan C Lam
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kevyn J Clark
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) - University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nicholas G Nickols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Johannes Czernin
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Takano S, Tomita N, Takaoka T, Niwa M, Torii A, Kita N, Okazaki D, Uchiyama K, Nakanishi-Imai M, Ayakawa S, Iida M, Tsuzuki Y, Otsuka S, Manabe Y, Nomura K, Ogawa Y, Miyakawa A, Miyamoto A, Takemoto S, Yasui T, Hiwatashi A. Late genitourinary toxicity in salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: impact of daily fraction doses. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1050-1056. [PMID: 38466928 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of daily fraction doses on late genitourinary (GU) toxicity after salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for prostate cancer. METHODS This multi-institutional retrospective study included 212 patients who underwent SRT between 2008 and 2018. All patients received image-guided intensity-modulated SRT at a median dose of 67.2 Gy in 1.8-2.3 Gy/fraction. The cumulative rates of late grade ≥2 GU and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were compared using Gray test, stratified by the ≤2.0 Gy/fraction (n = 137) and ≥2.1 Gy/fraction groups (n = 75), followed by multivariate analyses. The total dose was represented as an equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) with α/β = 3 Gy. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 63 months, the cumulative rates of 5-year late grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicities were 14% and 2.5%, respectively. The cumulative rates of 5-year late grade ≥2 GU toxicity in the ≥2.1 Gy/fraction and ≤2.0 Gy/fraction groups were 22% and 10%, respectively (P = .020). In the multivariate analysis, ≥2.1 Gy/fraction was still associated with an increased risk of late grade ≥2 GU toxicity (hazard ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-4.99; P = .023), while the total dose was not significant. CONCLUSION The present results showed that ≥2.1 Gy/fraction resulted in a higher incidence of late grade ≥2 GU toxicity in SRT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE The impact of fraction doses on late GU toxicity after SRT remains unknown. The results suggest that higher fraction doses may increase the risk of late GU toxicity in SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiya Takano
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Natsuo Tomita
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Taiki Takaoka
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Masanari Niwa
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Akira Torii
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Nozomi Kita
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Dai Okazaki
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Kaoru Uchiyama
- Department of Radiology, Kariya Toyota General Hospital, Kariya, Aichi 448-8505, Japan
| | - Mikiko Nakanishi-Imai
- Department of Radiology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8650, Japan
| | - Shiho Ayakawa
- Department of Radiology, Japan Community Health care Organization Chukyo Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi 457-8510, Japan
| | - Masato Iida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Suzuka General Hospital, Suzuka, Mie 513-0818, Japan
| | - Yusuke Tsuzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 462-8508, Japan
| | - Shinya Otsuka
- Department of Radiology, Okazaki City Hospital, Okazaki, Aichi 444-8553, Japan
| | - Yoshihiko Manabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanbu Tokushukai General Hospital, Shimajiri, Okinawa 901-0493, Japan
| | - Kento Nomura
- Department of Radiotherapy, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 462-8508, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kasugai Municipal Hospital, Kasugai, Aichi 486-8510, Japan
| | - Akifumi Miyakawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 460-0001, Japan
| | - Akihiko Miyamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokuto Hospital, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-0833, Japan
| | - Shinya Takemoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujieda Heisei Memorial Hospital, Fujieda, Shizuoka 426-8662, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yasui
- Department of Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Akio Hiwatashi
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Scharl S, Zamboglou C, Strouthos I, Farolfi A, Serani F, Koerber SA, Debus J, Peeken JC, Vogel MME, Kroeze SGC, Guckenberger M, Krafcsik M, Hruby G, Emmett L, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Trapp C, Spohn SKB, Henkenberens C, Mayer B, Shelan M, Aebersold DM, Thamm R, Wiegel T. European association of urology risk stratification predicts outcome in patients receiving PSMA-PET-planned salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110215. [PMID: 38458259 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The European Association of Urology (EAU) proposed a risk stratification (high vs. low risk) for patients with biochemical recurrence (BR) following radical prostatectomy (RP). Here we investigated whether this stratification accurately predicts outcome, particularly in patients staged with PSMA-PET. METHODS For this study, we used a retrospective database including 1222 PSMA-PET-staged prostate cancer patients who were treated with salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for BR, at 11 centers in 5 countries. Patients with lymph node metastases (pN1 or cN1) or unclear EAU risk group were excluded. The remaining cohort comprised 526 patients, including 132 low-risk and 394 high-risk patients. RESULTS The median follow-up time after SRT was 31.0 months. The 3-year biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) was 85.7 % in EAU low-risk versus 69.4 % in high-risk patients (p = 0.002). The 3-year metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 94.4 % in low-risk versus 87.6 % in high-risk patients (p = 0.005). The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 99.0 % in low-risk versus 99.6 % in high-risk patients (p = 0.925). In multivariate analysis, EAU risk group remained a statistically significant predictor of BPFS (p = 0.003, HR 2.022, 95 % CI 1.262-3.239) and MFS (p = 0.013, HR 2.986, 95 % CI 1.262-7.058). CONCLUSION Our data support the EAU risk group definition. EAU risk grouping for BCR reliably predicted outcome in patients staged lymph node-negative after RP and with PSMA-PET before SRT. To our knowledge, this is the first study validating the EAU risk grouping in patients treated with PSMA-PET-planned SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Scharl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany.
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center -Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Serani
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | - Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | | | | | - Manuel Krafcsik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| | - George Hruby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital - University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann
- Department of Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center -Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Benjamin Mayer
- Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Reinhard Thamm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Le Bao V, Haworth A, Dowling J, Walker A, Arumugam S, Jameson M, Chlap P, Wiltshire K, Keats S, Cloak K, Sidhom M, Kneebone A, Holloway L. Evaluating the relationship between contouring variability and modelled treatment outcome for prostate bed radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:085008. [PMID: 38471173 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad3325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
Objectives.Contouring similarity metrics are often used in studies of inter-observer variation and automatic segmentation but do not provide an assessment of clinical impact. This study focused on post-prostatectomy radiotherapy and aimed to (1) identify if there is a relationship between variations in commonly used contouring similarity metrics and resulting dosimetry and (2) identify the variation in clinical target volume (CTV) contouring that significantly impacts dosimetry.Approach.The study retrospectively analysed CT scans of 10 patients from the TROG 08.03 RAVES trial. The CTV, rectum, and bladder were contoured independently by three experienced observers. Using these contours reference simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) volumes were established. Additional CTVs were generated using an atlas algorithm based on a single benchmark case with 42 manual contours. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans were generated for the observer, atlas, and reference volumes. The dosimetry was evaluated using radiobiological metrics. Correlations between contouring similarity and dosimetry metrics were calculated using Spearman coefficient (Γ). To access impact of variations in planning target volume (PTV) margin, the STAPLE PTV was uniformly contracted and expanded, with plans created for each PTV volume. STAPLE dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were exported for plans generated based on the contracted/expanded volumes, and dose-volume metrics assessed.Mainresults. The study found no strong correlations between the considered similarity metrics and modelled outcomes. Moderate correlations (0.5 <Γ< 0.7) were observed for Dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard, and mean distance to agreement metrics and rectum toxicities. The observations of this study indicate a tendency for variations in CTV contraction/expansion below 5 mm to result in minor dosimetric impacts.Significance. Contouring similarity metrics must be used with caution when interpreting them as indicators of treatment plan variation. For post-prostatectomy VMAT patients, this work showed variations in contours with an expansion/contraction of less than 5 mm did not lead to notable dosimetric differences, this should be explored in a larger dataset to assess generalisability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viet Le Bao
- South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Annette Haworth
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Jason Dowling
- South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Amy Walker
- South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Sankar Arumugam
- South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael Jameson
- St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- GenesisCare, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Phillip Chlap
- South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsty Wiltshire
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah Keats
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirrily Cloak
- South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mark Sidhom
- South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Lois Holloway
- South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Australia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hassan SP, de Leon J, Batumalai V, Moutrie Z, Hogan L, Ge Y, Stricker P, Jameson MG. Magnetic resonance guided adaptive post prostatectomy radiotherapy: Accumulated dose comparison of different workflows. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14253. [PMID: 38394627 PMCID: PMC11005979 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to assess the use of magnetic resonance guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) in the post-prostatectomy setting; comparing dose accumulation for our initial seven patients treated with fully adaptive workflow on the Unity MR-Linac (MRL) and with non-adaptive plans generated offline. Additionally, we analyzed toxicity in patients receiving treatment. METHODS Seven patients were treated with MRgART. The prescription was 70-72 Gy in 35-36 fractions. Patients were treated with an adapt to shape (ATS) technique. For each clinically delivered plan, a non-adaptive plan based upon the reference plan was generated and compared to the associated clinically delivered plan. A total of 468 plans were analyzed. Concordance Index of target and Organs at Risk (OARs) for each fraction with reference contours was analyzed. Acute toxicity was then assessed at six-months following completion of treatment with Common Terminology for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Toxicity Criteria. RESULTS A total of 246 fractions were clinically delivered to seven patients; 234 fractions were delivered via MRgART and 12 fractions delivered via a traditional linear accelerator due to machine issues. Pre-treatment reference plans met CTV and OAR criteria. PTV coverage satisfaction was higher in the clinically delivered adaptive plans than non-adaptive comparison plans; 42.93% versus 7.27% respectively. Six-month CTCAE genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity was absent in most patients, and mild-to-moderate in a minority of patients (Grade 1 GU toxicity in one patient and Grade 2 GI toxicity in one patient). CONCLUSIONS Daily MRgART treatment consistently met planning criteria. Target volume variability in prostate bed treatment can be mitigated by using MRgART and deliver satisfactory coverage of CTV whilst minimizing dose to adjacent OARs and reducing toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean P. Hassan
- GenesisCareSt Vincent's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Vikneswary Batumalai
- GenesisCareSt Vincent's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Zoe Moutrie
- GenesisCareSt Vincent's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- South Western Sydney Cancer ServicesNew South Wales HealthSydneyAustralia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical ResearchSydneyAustralia
| | - Louise Hogan
- GenesisCareSt Vincent's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- GenesisCareMurdochWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Yuanyuan Ge
- GenesisCareSt Vincent's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Phillip Stricker
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Western Sydney UniversityPenrithNew South WalesAustralia
- St Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research CentreDarlinghurstNew South WalesAustralia
- Garvan Institute, DarlinghurstSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- University of SydneyCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Michael G. Jameson
- GenesisCareSt Vincent's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Centre for Medical Radiation PhysicsUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Staal FHE, Janssen J, Oprea-Lager DE, Engelen AM, van Limbergen EJ, Smeenk RJ, de Jong MAA, Budiharto TCG, Jacobs I, Haverkort DMAD, Brouwer CL, Ng Wei Siang K, Langendijk JA, Verzijlbergen JF, de Jong IJ, Noordzij W, Aluwini S. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Based Clinical Target Volume Delineation Guideline for Postprostatectomy Salvage Radiation Therapy: The PERYTON Guideline. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:688-696. [PMID: 37729971 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) scan is the standard imaging procedure for biochemical recurrent prostate cancer postprostatectomy because of its high detection rate at low serum prostate-specific antigen levels. However, existing guidelines for clinical target volume (CTV) in prostate bed salvage external beam radiation therapy (sEBRT) are primarily based on experience-based clinical consensus and have been validated using conventional imaging modalities. Therefore, this study aimed to optimize CTV definition in sEBRT by using PSMA PET/CT-detected local recurrences (LRs). METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with suspected LR on PSMA PET/CT postprostatectomy were retrospectively enrolled in 9 Dutch centers. Anonymized scans were centrally reviewed by an expert nuclear medicine physician. Each boundary of the CTV guideline from the Groupe Francophone de Radiothérapie en Urologie (GFRU) was evaluated and adapted to improve the accuracy and coverage of the area at risk of LR (CTV) on PSMA PET/CT. The proposed CTV adaptation was discussed with the radiation oncologists of the participating centers, and final consensus was reached. To assess reproducibility, the participating centers were asked to delineate 3 new cases according to the new PERYTON-CTV, and the submitted contours were evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). RESULTS After central review, 93 LRs were identified on 83 PSMA PET/CTs. The proposed CTV definition improved the coverage of PSMA PET/CT-detected LRs from 67% to 96% compared with the GFRU-CTV, while reducing the GFRU-CTV by 25%. The new CTV was highly reproducible, with a mean DSC of 0.82 (range, 0.81-0.83). CONCLUSIONS This study contributes to the optimization of CTV definition in postprostatectomy sEBRT by using the pattern of LR detected on PSMA PET/CT. The PERYTON-CTV is highly reproducible across the participating centers and ensures coverage of 96% LRs while reducing the GFRU-CTV by 25%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floor H E Staal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Jorinde Janssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Evert J van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAASTRO Clinic, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Jan Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Tom C G Budiharto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Jacobs
- Zuidwest Radiotherapeutisch Instituut, Vlissingen/Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| | | | - Charlotte L Brouwer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Kelvin Ng Wei Siang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J Fred Verzijlbergen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ingle Jan de Jong
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Walter Noordzij
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tegtmeier RC, Kutyreff CJ, Smetanick JL, Hobbis D, Laughlin BS, Toesca DAS, Clouser EL, Rong Y. Custom-Trained Deep Learning-Based Auto-Segmentation for Male Pelvic Iterative CBCT on C-Arm Linear Accelerators. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024:S1879-8500(24)00035-3. [PMID: 38325548 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the clinical applicability of a commercial artificial intelligence-driven deep learning auto-segmentation (DLAS) tool on enhanced iterative cone beam computed tomography (iCBCT) acquisitions for intact prostate and prostate bed treatments. METHODS AND MATERIALS DLAS models were trained using 116 iCBCT data sets with manually delineated organs at risk (bladder, femoral heads, and rectum) and target volumes (intact prostate and prostate bed) adhering to institution-specific contouring guidelines. An additional 25 intact prostate and prostate bed iCBCT data sets were used for model testing. Segmentation accuracy relative to a reference structure set was quantified using various geometric comparison metrics and qualitatively evaluated by trained physicists and physicians. These results were compared with those obtained for an additional DLAS-based model trained on planning computed tomography (pCT) data sets and for a deformable image registration (DIR)-based automatic contour propagation method. RESULTS In most instances, statistically significant differences in the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% directed Hausdorff distance, and mean surface distance metrics were observed between the models, as the iCBCT-trained DLAS model outperformed the pCT-trained DLAS model and DIR-based method for all organs at risk and the intact prostate target volume. Mean DSC values for the proposed method were ≥0.90 for these volumes of interest. The iCBCT-trained DLAS model demonstrated a relatively suboptimal performance for the prostate bed segmentation, as the mean DSC value was <0.75 for this target contour. Overall, 90% of bladder, 93% of femoral head, 67% of rectum, and 92% of intact prostate contours generated by the proposed method were deemed clinically acceptable based on qualitative scoring, and approximately 63% of prostate bed contours required moderate or major manual editing to adhere to institutional contouring guidelines. CONCLUSIONS The proposed method presents the potential for improved segmentation accuracy and efficiency compared with the DIR-based automatic contour propagation method as commonly applied in CBCT-based dose evaluation and calculation studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riley C Tegtmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | | | - Dean Hobbis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Brady S Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Edward L Clouser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Yi Rong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Staal FH, Siang KNW, Brouwer CL, Janssen J, Budiharto TC, Haverkort DM, Hollmann B, Jacobs I, De Jong MA, van de Sande MA, Vanneste BG, De Jong IJ, Verzijlbergen JF, Langendijk JA, Smeenk RJ, Aluwini S. Pretrial Quality Assurance for Hypofractionated Salvage Radiation Therapy After Prostatectomy in the Multi-Institutional PERYTON-trial. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101379. [PMID: 38405312 PMCID: PMC10885595 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The PERYTON trial is a multicenter randomized controlled trial that will investigate whether the treatment outcome of salvage external beam radiation therapy (sEBRT) will be improved with hypofractionated radiation therapy. A pretrial quality assurance (QA) program was undertaken to ensure protocol compliance within the PERYTON trial and to assess variation in sEBRT treatment protocols between the participating centers. Methods and Materials Completion of the QA program was mandatory for each participating center (N = 8) to start patient inclusion. The pretrial QA program included (1) a questionnaire on the center-specific sEBRT protocol, (2) a delineation exercise of the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk, and (3) a treatment planning exercise. All contours were analyzed using the pairwise dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the 50th and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD50 and HD95, respectively). The submitted treatment plans were reviewed for protocol compliance. Results The results of the questionnaire showed that high-quality, state-of-the-art radiation therapy techniques were used in the participating centers and identified variations of the sEBRT protocols used concerning the position verification and preparation techniques. The submitted CTVs showed significant variation, with a range in volume of 29 cm3 to 167 cm3, a mean pairwise DSC of 0.52, and a mean HD50 and HD95 of 2.3 mm and 24.4 mm, respectively. Only in 1 center the treatment plan required adaptation before meeting all constraints of the PERYTON protocol. Conclusions The pretrial QA of the PERYTON trial demonstrated that high-quality, but variable, radiation techniques were used in the 8 participating centers. The treatment planning exercise confirmed that the dose constraints of the PERYTON protocol were feasible for all participating centers. The observed variation in CTV delineation led to agreement on a new (image-based) delineation guideline to be used by all participating centers within the PERYTON trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floor H.E. Staal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Kelvin Ng Wei Siang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L. Brouwer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jorinde Janssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Tom C.G. Budiharto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Birgit Hollmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HAGA Ziekenhuis, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Jacobs
- Zuidwest Radiotherapy Institute Vlissingen/Roosendaal, Vlissingen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ben G.L. Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAASTRO Clinic, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Igle Jan De Jong
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J. Fred Verzijlbergen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A. Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Jan Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sritharan K, Akhiat H, Cahill D, Choi S, Choudhury A, Chung P, Diaz J, Dysager L, Hall W, Huddart R, Kerkmeijer LGW, Lawton C, Mohajer J, Murray J, Nyborg CJ, Pos FJ, Rigo M, Schytte T, Sidhom M, Sohaib A, Tan A, van der Voort van Zyp J, Vesprini D, Zelefsky MJ, Tree AC. Development of Prostate Bed Delineation Consensus Guidelines for Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Radiotherapy and Assessment of Its Effect on Interobserver Variability. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:378-389. [PMID: 37633499 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiotherapy planning is becoming more widespread, particularly with the emergence of MRI-guided radiotherapy systems. Existing guidelines for defining the prostate bed clinical target volume (CTV) show considerable heterogeneity. This study aimed to establish baseline interobserver variability (IOV) for prostate bed CTV contouring on MRI, develop international consensus guidelines, and evaluate its effect on IOV. METHODS AND MATERIALS Participants delineated the CTV on 3 MRI scans, obtained from the Elekta Unity MR-Linac, as per their normal practice. Radiation oncologist contours were visually examined for discrepancies, and interobserver comparisons were evaluated against simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) contours using overlap metrics (Dice similarity coefficient and Cohen's kappa), distance metrics (mean distance to agreement and Hausdorff distance), and volume measurements. A literature review of postradical prostatectomy local recurrence patterns was performed and presented alongside IOV results to the participants. Consensus guidelines were collectively constructed, and IOV assessment was repeated using these guidelines. RESULTS Sixteen radiation oncologists' contours were included in the final analysis. Visual evaluation demonstrated significant differences in the superior, inferior, and anterior borders. Baseline IOV assessment indicated moderate agreement for the overlap metrics while volume and distance metrics demonstrated greater variability. Consensus for optimal prostate bed CTV boundaries was established during a virtual meeting. After guideline development, a decrease in IOV was observed. The maximum volume ratio decreased from 4.7 to 3.1 and volume coefficient of variation reduced from 40% to 34%. The mean Dice similarity coefficient rose from 0.72 to 0.75 and the mean distance to agreement decreased from 3.63 to 2.95 mm. CONCLUSIONS Interobserver variability in prostate bed contouring exists among international genitourinary experts, although this is lower than previously reported. Consensus guidelines for MRI-based prostate bed contouring have been developed, and this has resulted in an improvement in contouring concordance. However, IOV persists and strategies such as an education program, development of a contouring atlas, and further refinement of the guidelines may lead to additional improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kobika Sritharan
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Declan Cahill
- Department of Urology, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Seungtaek Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Lars Dysager
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - William Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Robert Huddart
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Colleen Lawton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | - Julia Murray
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Floris J Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar Di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Tine Schytte
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mark Sidhom
- Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Aslam Sohaib
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Tan
- Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia; James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Danny Vesprini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alison C Tree
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Takano S, Tomita N, Niwa M, Torii A, Takaoka T, Kita N, Uchiyama K, Nakanishi-Imai M, Ayakawa S, Iida M, Tsuzuki Y, Otsuka S, Manabe Y, Nomura K, Ogawa Y, Miyakawa A, Miyamoto A, Takemoto S, Yasui T, Hiwatashi A. Impact of radiation doses on clinical relapse of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:113. [PMID: 38167430 PMCID: PMC10761985 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50434-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
The relationship between radiation doses and clinical relapse in patients receiving salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) remains unclear. We identified 292 eligible patients treated with SRT between 2005 and 2018 at 15 institutions. Clinical relapse-free survival (cRFS) between the ≥ 66 Gy (n = 226) and < 66 Gy groups (n = 66) were compared using the Log-rank test, followed by univariate and multivariate analyses and a subgroup analysis. After a median follow-up of 73 months, 6-year biochemical relapse-free survival, cRFS, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival rates were 58, 92, 98, and 94%, respectively. Six-year cRFS rates in the ≥ 66 Gy and < 66 Gy groups were 94 and 87%, respectively (p = 0.022). The multivariate analysis revealed that Gleason score ≥ 8, seminal vesicle involvement, PSA at BCR after RP ≥ 0.5 ng/ml, and a dose < 66 Gy correlated with clinical relapse (p = 0.015, 0.012, 0.024, and 0.0018, respectively). The subgroup analysis showed the consistent benefit of a dose ≥ 66 Gy in patients across most subgroups. Doses ≥ 66 Gy were found to significantly, albeit borderline, increase the risk of late grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity compared to doses < 66 Gy (14% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.055). This large multi-institutional retrospective study demonstrated that a higher SRT dose (≥ 66 Gy) resulted in superior cRFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiya Takano
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Natsuo Tomita
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.
| | - Masanari Niwa
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Akira Torii
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Taiki Takaoka
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Nozomi Kita
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Kaoru Uchiyama
- Department of Radiology, Kariya Toyota General Hospital, 5-15 Sumiyoshi-Cho, Kariya, Aichi, 448-8505, Japan
| | - Mikiko Nakanishi-Imai
- Department of Radiology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, 2-9 Myoken-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8650, Japan
| | - Shiho Ayakawa
- Department of Radiology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Chukyo Hospital, 1-1-10 Sanjo, Minami-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 457-8510, Japan
| | - Masato Iida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Suzuka General Hospital, 1275-53 Yamanoue, Yasuzuka-Cho, Suzuka, Mie, 513-0818, Japan
| | - Yusuke Tsuzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, 1-1-1 Hirate-Cho, Kita-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Shinya Otsuka
- Department of Radiology, Okazaki City Hospital, 3-1 Goshoai, Koryuji-Cho, Okazaki, Aichi, 444-8553, Japan
| | - Yoshihiko Manabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanbu Tokushukai General Hospital, 171-1 Hokama, Yaese-Cho, Shimajiri, Okinawa, 901-0493, Japan
| | - Kento Nomura
- Department of Radiotherapy, Nagoya City West Medical Center, 1-1-1 Hirate-Cho, Kita-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kasugai Municipal Hospital, 1-1-1 Takaki-Cho, Kasugai, Aichi, 486-8510, Japan
| | - Akifumi Miyakawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, 4-1-1, Sannomaru, Naka-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 460-0001, Japan
| | - Akihiko Miyamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokuto Hospital, 7-5 Kisen, Inada-Cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-0833, Japan
| | - Shinya Takemoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujieda Heisei Memorial Hospital, 123-1 Mizukami-Cho, Fujieda, Shizuoka, 426-8662, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yasui
- Department of Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Akio Hiwatashi
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bugeja JM, Mehawed G, Roberts MJ, Rukin N, Dowling J, Murray R. Prostate volume analysis in image registration for prostate cancer care: a verification study. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:1791-1802. [PMID: 37819450 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01342-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Combined magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) may enhance diagnosis, aid surgical planning and intra-operative orientation for prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy. Although PET-MRI may provide these benefits, PET-MRI machines are not widely available. Image fusion of Prostate specific membrane antigen PET/CT and MRI acquired separately may be a suitable clinical alternative. This study compares CT-MR registration algorithms for urological prostate cancer care. Paired whole-pelvis MR and CT scan data were used (n = 20). A manual prostate CTV contour was performed independently on each patients MR and CT image. A semi-automated rigid-, automated rigid- and automated non-rigid registration technique was applied to align the MR and CT data. Dice Similarity Index (DSI), 95% Hausdorff distance (95%HD) and average surface distance (ASD) measures were used to assess the closeness of the manual and registered contours. The automated non-rigid approach had a significantly improved performance compared to the automated rigid- and semi-automated rigid-registration, having better average scores and decreased spread for the DSI, 95%HD and ASD (all p < 0.001). Additionally, the automated rigid approach had similar significantly improved performance compared to the semi-automated rigid registration across all accuracy metrics observed (all p < 0.001). Overall, all registration techniques studied here demonstrated sufficient accuracy for exploring their clinical use. While the fully automated non-rigid registration algorithm in the present study provided the most accurate registration, the semi-automated rigid registration is a quick, feasible, and accessible method to perform image registration for prostate cancer care by urologists and radiation oncologists now.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Bugeja
- Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Health and Biosecurity, Herston, Australia.
| | - Georges Mehawed
- Herston Biofabrication Institute, Urology Program, Herston, Australia
- Urology Department, Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Australian Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Matthew J Roberts
- Herston Biofabrication Institute, Urology Program, Herston, Australia
- Urology Department, Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Urology Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia
- University of Queensland, University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Australia
| | - Nicholas Rukin
- Herston Biofabrication Institute, Urology Program, Herston, Australia
- Urology Department, Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jason Dowling
- Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Health and Biosecurity, Herston, Australia
- School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rebecca Murray
- Herston Biofabrication Institute, Urology Program, Herston, Australia
- Urology Department, Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, Australia
- Australian Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ah-Thiane L, Sargos P, Chapet O, Jolicoeur M, Terlizzi M, Salembier C, Boustani J, Prevost C, Gaudioz S, Derashodian T, Palumbo S, De Hertogh O, Créhange G, Zilli T, Supiot S. Managing postoperative biochemical relapse in prostate cancer, from the perspective of the Francophone group of Urological radiotherapy (GFRU). Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 120:102626. [PMID: 37734178 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
Up to 50% of patients treated with radical surgery for localized prostate cancer may experience biochemical recurrence that requires appropriate management. Definitions of biochemical relapse may vary, but, in all cases, consist of an increase in a PSA without clinical or radiological signs of disease. Molecular imaging through to positron emission tomography has taken a preponderant place in relapse diagnosis, progressively replacing bone scan and CT-scan. Prostate bed radiotherapy is currently a key treatment, the action of which should be potentiated by androgen deprivation therapy. Nowadays perspectives consist in determining the best combination therapies, particularly thanks to next-generation hormone therapies, but not exclusively. Several trials are ongoing and should address these issues. We present here a literature review aiming to discuss the current management of biochemical relapse in prostate cancer after radical surgery, in lights of recent findings, as well as future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loic Ah-Thiane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ICO René Gauducheau, St-Herblain, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - Olivier Chapet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Marjory Jolicoeur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charles Le Moyne Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mario Terlizzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - Carl Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jihane Boustani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Célia Prevost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Sonya Gaudioz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Talar Derashodian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sindi Ahluwalia Hawkins Centre, Kelowna, Canada
| | - Samuel Palumbo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU UCL Namur-Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium
| | - Olivier De Hertogh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHR Verviers East Belgium, Verviers, Belgium
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Curie Institute, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ICO René Gauducheau, St-Herblain, France.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Le Guevelou J, Magne N, Counago F, Magsanoc JM, Vermeille M, De Crevoisier R, Benziane-Ouaritini N, Ost P, Niazi T, Supiot S, Sargos P. Stereotactic body radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: current status and future directions. World J Urol 2023; 41:3333-3344. [PMID: 37725131 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04605-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Around 40% of men with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer will experience a biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of this review is to describe both toxicity and oncological outcomes following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) delivered to the prostate bed (PB). METHOD In april 2023, we performed a systematic review of studies published in MEDLINE or ClinicalTrials.gov according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews, using the keywords "stereotactic radiotherapy" AND "postoperative" AND "prostate cancer". RESULTS A total of 14 studies assessing either adjuvant or salvage SBRT to the whole PB or macroscopic local recurrence (MLR) within the PB, and SBRT on radiorecurrent MLR within the PB were included. Doses delivered to either whole PB or MLR between 30 to 40 Gy are associated with a low rate of late grade ≥ 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity, ranging from 2.2 to 15.1%. Doses above 40 Gy are associated with increased rate of late GU toxicity, raising up to 38%. Oncological outcomes should be interpreted with caution, due to both short follow-up, heterogeneous populations and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) use. CONCLUSION PB or MLR SBRT delivered at doses up to 40 Gy appears safe with relatively low late severe GU toxicity rates. Caution is needed with dose-escalated RT schedules above 40 Gy. Further prospective trials are eagerly awaited in this disease setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicolas Magne
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Felipe Counago
- Radiation Oncology Department, GenesisCare Madrid Clinical Director, San Francisco de Asis and La Milagrosa Hospitals, National Chair of Research and Clinical Trials, GenesisCare, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Matthieu Vermeille
- Radiation Oncology Department, Genolier Swiss Radio-Oncology Network, Genolier, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Piet Ost
- Radiation Oncology Department, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tamim Niazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Grierson E, Wilkinson D, Causer L, de Leon J. Evaluating the geometric and dosimetric impact of applying anisotropic CTV to PTV margins in image-guided post-prostatectomy radiation therapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:796-805. [PMID: 37454334 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Guidelines for clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins in post-prostatectomy radiation therapy (PPRT) are varied and often not clearly defined. Assessment of appropriateness of margins is commonly measured on prevalence of geographic miss. METHODS Cone-beam CT (CBCT) images (n = 92) for 10 PPRT patients were incorporated to provide on-treatment information on the appropriateness of six different CTV expansion margins in terms of geographic miss and change in dose-volume statistics for CTV, rectum and bladder. Uniform margins included 10 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm + 5 mm posteriorly and 5 mm + 3 mm posteriorly. In addition, two anisotropic margins were evaluated by separating the superior and inferior portions of the CTV before expansion. Treatment plans were created for each PTV retrospectively. RESULTS The frequency of geographic miss was the smallest for the large uniform expansions but resulted in the highest organ-at-risk (OAR) doses. Geographic miss in the smaller uniform and anisotropic PTVs was more prevalent but commonly to a small volume < 1% of CTV. When averaged over all CBCT fractions, V95% dose for all CTV margins remained > 99%. The anisotropic expansions generated smaller irradiated target volumes and consequently saw up to 7.3% reduction in bladder dose when compared with similar uniform expansion margins. CONCLUSION Supplementing the incidence of geographic miss with dosimetric information on target coverage and OAR doses provides more informed assessment of the appropriateness of different CTV expansion margins. Our study extends the evaluation of anisotropic margins for PPRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Grierson
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dean Wilkinson
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lauren Causer
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeremiah de Leon
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shakespeare TP, Yap SZL, Hsieh M, Tahir ARM, Armstrong S. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography detected local failure after post-prostatectomy radiation therapy: Low rates of out-of-field recurrence validates current Australian prostate bed contouring guidelines. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:662-667. [PMID: 37401187 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Australian Faculty of Radiation Oncology Genitourinary Group (FROGG) developed prostate bed clinical target volume (CTV) contouring guidelines which were subsequently used to develop the National EviQ guidelines for adjuvant and salvage post-prostatectomy radiotherapy (PPRT). These guidelines were based mainly upon consensus agreement. With the advent of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET), sites of recurrence can now be detected with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels following radical prostatectomy. We evaluated sites of recurrence in patients treated with FROGG/EviQ CTVs to inform upcoming modifications of these guidelines. METHODS At our institution, we use the FROGG/EviQ guidelines for PPRT. From 2015, patients with PSA failure following PPRT have been re-staged using PSMA PET imaging. We identified patients with PET-avid local, nodal, and distant recurrences, fusing them with original treatment plans to determine whether recurrences were within or outside the prostate bed CTV. Regional nodal failures were reviewed to determine if they were within current elective node contouring guidelines. RESULTS Ninety-four patients had positive PSMA PET following PPRT. Nine (9.6%) recurrences were local, seven being local-only. One local recurrence (1.1%) was just superior to the contoured prostate bed CTV, located within the vas deferens. Seventy-three (77.7%) patients had a component of node failure, with 56 (59.6%) having node-only failure. Sites of nodal relapses were covered by standard contouring guidelines 60.3% of the time. CONCLUSION The low recurrence rate outside of current prostate bed CTV contouring guidelines is consistent with other studies using contemporary contouring, and validates the efficacy of the current FROGG/EviQ prostate bed CTV definition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Philip Shakespeare
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shaun Zheng Liang Yap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Hsieh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Abdul Rahim Mohd Tahir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shreya Armstrong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, North Coast Cancer Institute, Lismore Base Hospital, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lawless A, Kneebone A, Armstrong S, Chander S, Christie D, Finnigan R, Hayden A, Higgs B, Knox M, Sasso G, Sidhom M, Shakespeare TP, Holt T. Patterns of practice regarding use of radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy: A survey of Radiation Oncologists and Urologists in Australia and New Zealand. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:556-563. [PMID: 37343171 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to investigate the patterns of practices of radiation oncologists (ROs) and urologists in Australia and New Zealand with respect to the utilisation of post-prostatectomy radiation therapy (RT) and help guide the development of an update to the existing Faculty of Radiation Oncology Genito-Urinary Group post-prostatectomy guidelines. METHODS ROs and urologists with subspecialty practice in prostate cancer from Australia and New Zealand were invited to participate in an online survey comprised of clinical scenarios regarding post-prostatectomy RT. RESULTS Sixty-five ROs and 28 urologists responded to the survey. In the setting of low-risk biochemical relapse, the threshold for initiating RT was lower for ROs than urologists. ROs were more likely than urologists to recommend adjuvant RT for node-positive disease. When salvage RT was advised for a pT3N0R1 recurrence, there was no consensus amongst ROs on whether to add either ADT or nodal treatment over prostate bed RT alone. For a solitary PSMA-avid pelvic lymph node recurrence, whole pelvis RT with androgen deprivation therapy was the preferred treatment option (72% ROs, 43% urologists). Most ROs (92%) recommended conventionally fractionated RT to 66-70 Gy, with a boost to any PSMA PET avid recurrent disease. CONCLUSION This survey highlights the marked discordance in practice for the management of prostate cancer relapse post-prostatectomy. This is seen not only between specialties but also within the radiation oncology community. This emphasises the need for an updated evidence-based guideline to be produced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lawless
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Kneebone
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shreya Armstrong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, North Coast Cancer Institute, Lismore Base Hospital, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarat Chander
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Christie
- Genesis Care, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Renee Finnigan
- Icon Cancer Centre, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Amy Hayden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Westmead & Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Braden Higgs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matthew Knox
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- St George and Sutherland Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Giuseppe Sasso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Te Whatu Ora, Auckland, New Zealand
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Mark Sidhom
- Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas P Shakespeare
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tanya Holt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hjelle LV, Sælen M, Aarsæther E, Knutsen T, Andersen S, Bentzen AG, Richardsen E, Wilsgaard T, Fosså SD, Haugnes HS. The Longitudinal Course of Prospectively Recorded Patient-reported Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Surgery and Salvage Radiotherapy. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 53:6-15. [PMID: 37441342 PMCID: PMC10334245 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after prostate cancer (PC) treatment, including both radical prostatectomy (RP) and salvage radiation therapy (SRT), are under-reported. Objective To investigate PROMs longitudinally from before SRT until 18 mo after SRT for men treated with contemporary treatment modalities. Design setting and participants This prospective, longitudinal cohort study included 120 men (whole cohort) treated with SRT administered with volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy from 2016 to 2021 at the University Hospital of North Norway. The whole cohort was followed from before SRT until 18 mo after SRT. A subcohort of 48 men was followed from before RP until 18 mo after SRT. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis PROMs were collected with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-26 (EPIC-26), covering symptoms of urinary incontinence, urinary irritative, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. The domain scores were inquired before RP, 3 mo after RP, before SRT, at SRT termination, and 3 and 18 mo after SRT. We used linear mixed models with repeated measurements design to assess changes in PROMs throughout the treatment period. Results and limitations The median age before SRT was 63 yr. For the whole cohort, all five domains worsened at 3 and 18 mo after SRT compared with those before SRT. The estimated mean changes from before SRT to 18 mo after SRT are as follows: urinary incontinence -13.1, urinary irritative function -10.4, bowel -16.8, sexual function -9.1, and hormonal function -20.2 (at clinically important levels for all domains but sexual). For the subcohort, the mean urinary incontinence, bowel, sexual, and hormonal functions were significantly worsened 3 and 18 mo after SRT compared with those before RP at clinically important levels. Conclusions Men treated for PC report particular increased severity of urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms after SRT compared with baseline status. Patient summary For men with prostate cancer, the treatment combination of surgery and salvage radiotherapy worsens urinary incontinence and bowel, sexual, and hormonal functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Line V. Hjelle
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Marie Sælen
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Erling Aarsæther
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Tore Knutsen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UIT The Artic University, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Sigve Andersen
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UIT The Artic University, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Anne G. Bentzen
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Elin Richardsen
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Tom Wilsgaard
- Institute of Community Medicine, UIT-The Artic University, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Sophie D. Fosså
- Division of Cancer Medicine and Radiotherapy, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege S. Haugnes
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UIT The Artic University, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dal Pra A, Dirix P, Khoo V, Carrie C, Cozzarini C, Fonteyne V, Ghadjar P, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Panebianco V, Zapatero A, Bossi A, Wiegel T. ESTRO ACROP guideline on prostate bed delineation for postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 41:100638. [PMID: 37251620 PMCID: PMC10209331 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objective Radiotherapy to the prostate bed is a potentially curative salvage option after radical prostatectomy. Although prostate bed contouring guidelines are available in the literature, important variabilities exist. The objective of this work is to provide a contemporary consensus guideline for prostate bed delineation for postoperative radiotherapy. Methods An ESTRO-ACROP contouring consensus panel consisting of 11 radiation oncologists and one radiologist, all with known subspecialty expertise in prostate cancer, was established. Participants were asked to delineate the prostate bed clinical target volumes (CTVs) in 3 separate clinically relevant scenarios: adjuvant radiation, salvage radiation with PSA progression, and salvage radiation with persistently elevated PSA. These cases focused on the presence of positive surgical margin, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesicles involvement. None of the cases had radiographic evidence of local recurrence on imaging. A single computed tomography (CT) dataset was shared via FALCON platform and contours were performed using EduCaseTM software. Contours were analyzed qualitatively using heatmaps which provided a visual assessment of controversial regions and quantitatively analyzed using Sorensen-Dice similarity coefficients. Participants also answered case-specific questionnaires addressing detailed recommendations on target delineation. Discussions via electronic mails and videoconferences for final editing and consensus were performed. Results The mean CTV for the adjuvant case was 76 cc (SD = 26.6), salvage radiation with PSA progression was 51.80 cc (SD = 22.7), and salvage radiation with persistently elevated PSA 57.63 cc (SD = 25.2). Compared to the median, the mean Sorensen-Dice similarity coefficient for the adjuvant case was 0.60 (SD 0.10), salvage radiation with PSA progression was 0.58 (SD = 0.12), and salvage radiation with persistently elevated PSA 0.60 (SD = 0.11). A heatmap for each clinical scenario was generated. The group agreed to proceed with a uniform recommendation for all cases, independent of the radiotherapy timing. Several controversial areas of the prostate bed CTV were identified based on both heatmaps and questionnaires. This formed the basis for discussions via videoconferences where the panel achieved consensus on the prostate bed CTV to be used as a novel guideline for postoperative prostate cancer radiotherapy. Conclusion Variability was observed in a group formed by experienced genitourinary radiation oncologists and a radiologist. A single contemporary ESTRO-ACROP consensus guideline was developed to address areas of dissonance and improve consistency in prostate bed delineation, independent of the indication.There is important variability in existing contouring guidelines for postoperative prostate bed (PB) radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy. This work aimed at providing a contemporary consensus guideline for PB delineation. An ESTRO ACROP consensus panel including radiation oncologists and a radiologist, all with known subspecialty expertise in prostate cancer, delineated the PB CTV in 3 scenarios: adjuvant RT, salvage RT with PSA progression, and salvage RT with persistently elevated PSA. None of the cases had evidence of local recurrence. Contours were analysed qualitatively using heatmaps for visual assessment of controversial regions and quantitatively using Sorensen-Dice coefficient. Case-specific questionnaires were also discussed via e-mails and videoconferences for consensus. Several controversial areas of the PB CTV were identified based on both heatmaps and questionnaires. This formed the basis for discussions via videoconferences. Finally, a contemporary ESTRO-ACROP consensus guideline was developed to address areas of dissonance and improve consistency in PB delineation, independent of the indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA
- University of Bern, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Cesare Cozzarini
- Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | - Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga
- Radiation Oncology, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria IP, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Radiation Oncology, Centre Charlebourg, La Garenne Colombe, France
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sonni I, Dal Pra A, O'Connell DP, Ells Z, Benz M, Nguyen K, Yoon SM, Deng J, Smith C, Grogan T, Nickols NG, Cao M, Kishan AU, Calais J. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-Based Atlas for Prostate Bed Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Clinical Implications for Salvage Radiation Therapy Contouring Guidelines. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:902-909. [PMID: 36759200 PMCID: PMC10241009 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the patterns of prostate bed (PB) recurrence in prostate cancer patients experiencing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence (BCP) or biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (68Ga-PSMA PET) in relation to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) clinical target volumes (CTVs). Methods: This single-center, retrospective analysis included patients with BCP or BCR after radical prostatectomy and PB recurrence on 68Ga-PSMA PET. The PB recurrences were delineated by nuclear medicine physicians, the CTVs by radiation oncologists contouring guidelines on the 68Ga-PSMA PET, respectively, masked from each other. The coverage of the 68Ga-PSMA PET recurrence was categorized as PSMA recurrence completely covered, partially covered, or not covered by the RTOG-based CTV. Further, we evaluated the differences in PSMA recurrence patterns among patients with different 68Ga-PSMA PET staging (miTNM). Mann-Whitney U tests, the chi-square test, and Spearman (ρ) correlation analysis were used to investigate associations between CTV coverage and 68Ga-PSMA PET-based tumor volume, serum PSA levels, miTNM, and rectal/bladder involvement. Results: A total of 226 patients were included in the analysis; 127 patients had PSMA recurrence limited to the PB (miTrN0M0), 30 had pelvic nodal disease (miTrN1M0), 32 had extrapelvic disease (miTrN0M1), and 37 had both pelvic nodal disease and extrapelvic disease (miTrN1M1). In the miTrN0M0 cohort, the recurrence involved the rectal and bladder walls in 12 of 127 (9%) and 4 of 127 (3%), respectively. The PSMA-positive PB recurrences were completely covered by the CTV in 68 of 127 patients (53%), partially covered in 43 of 127 (34%), and not covered in 16 of 127 (13%). Full coverage was associated with a smaller tumor volume (P = 0.043), a lack of rectal/bladder wall involvement (P = 0.03), and lower miTNM staging (P = 0.035) but not with lower serum PSA levels (P = 0.979). Conclusion: Our study suggests that 68Ga-PSMA PET can be a valuable tool for guiding salvage radiation therapy (SRT) planning directed to the PB in the setting of postoperative BCR or BCP. These data should be incorporated into the redefinition of PB contouring guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Sonni
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California;
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Dylan P O'Connell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Zachary Ells
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthias Benz
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Kathleen Nguyen
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Stephanie M Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jie Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Clayton Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Tristan Grogan
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - Nickolas G Nickols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Veteran Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Scharl S, Zamboglou C, Strouthos I, Farolfi A, Serani F, Lanzafame H, Giuseppe Morganti A, Trapp C, Koerber SA, Debus J, Peeken JC, Vogel MME, Vrachimis A, K B Spohn S, Ruf J, Grosu AL, Ceci F, Fendler WP, Bartenstein P, Kroeze SGC, Guckenberger M, Krafcsik M, Klopscheck C, Fanti S, Hruby G, Emmett L, Belka C, Stief C, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Henkenberens C, Mayer B, Miksch J, Shelan M, Aebersold DM, Thamm R, Wiegel T. Salvage radiotherapy is effective in patients with PSMA-PET-negative biochemical recurrence- results of a retrospective study. Radiother Oncol 2023; 184:109678. [PMID: 37146766 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND /Purpose: The present study aimed to assess whether SRT to the prostatic fossa should be initiated in a timely manner after detecting biochemical recurrence (BR) in patients with prostate cancer, when no correlate was identified with prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET). MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective, multicenter analysis included 1222 patients referred for PSMA-PET after a radical prostatectomy due to BR. Exclusion criteria were: pathological lymph node metastases, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence, distant or lymph node metastases, nodal irradiation, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). This led to a cohort of 341 patients. Biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) was the primary study endpoint. RESULTS The median follow-up was 28.0 months. The 3-year BPFS was 71.6% in PET-negative cases and 80.8% in locally PET-positive cases. This difference was significant in univariate (p=0.019), but not multivariate analyses (p=0.366, HR: 1.46, 95%CI: 0.64-3.32). The 3-year BPFS in PET-negative cases was significantly influenced by age (p=0.005), initial pT3/4 (p<0.001), pathology scores (ISUP) ≥3 (p=0.026), and doses to fossa >70 Gy (p=0.027) in univariate analyses. In multivariate analyses, only age (HR: 1.096, 95%CI: 1.023-1.175, p=0.009) and PSA-doubling time (HR: 0.339, 95%CI: 0.139-0.826, p=0.017) remained significant. CONCLUSION To our best knowledge, this study provided the largest SRT analysis in patients without ADT that were lymph node-negative on PSMA-PET. A multivariate analysis showed no significant difference in BPFS between locally PET-positive and PET-negative cases. These results supported the current EAU recommendation to initiate SRT in a timely manner after detecting BR in PET negative patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Scharl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany.
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center -Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany; Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Serani
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Helena Lanzafame
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital - University of Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum, München, Germany; Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum, München, Germany; Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Alexis Vrachimis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus; C.A.R.I.C. Cancer Research & Innovation Center, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center -Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany; Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center -Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie G C Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany; Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Canton Hospital of Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | | | - Manuel Krafcsik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Stefano Fanti
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - George Hruby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital - University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney Australia
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Benjamin Mayer
- Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Jonathan Miksch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Reinhard Thamm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wang F, Xu X, Yang D, Chen RC, Royce TJ, Wang A, Lian J, Lian C. Dynamic Cross-Task Representation Adaptation for Clinical Targets Co-Segmentation in CT Image-Guided Post-Prostatectomy Radiotherapy. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2023; 42:1046-1055. [PMID: 36399586 PMCID: PMC10209913 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2022.3223405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy requires precise delineations of prostate bed (PB), i.e., the clinical target volume, and surrounding organs at risk (OARs) to optimize radiotherapy planning. Segmenting PB is particularly challenging even for clinicians, e.g., from the planning computed tomography (CT) images, as it is an invisible/virtual target after the operative removal of the cancerous prostate gland. Very recently, a few deep learning-based methods have been proposed to automatically contour non-contrast PB by leveraging its spatial reliance on adjacent OARs (i.e., the bladder and rectum) with much more clear boundaries, mimicking the clinical workflow of experienced clinicians. Although achieving state-of-the-art results from both the clinical and technical aspects, these existing methods improperly ignore the gap between the hierarchical feature representations needed for segmenting those fundamentally different clinical targets (i.e., PB and OARs), which in turn limits their delineation accuracy. This paper proposes an asymmetric multi-task network integrating dynamic cross-task representation adaptation (i.e., DyAdapt) for accurate and efficient co-segmentation of PB and OARs in one-pass from CT images. In the learning-to-learn framework, the DyAdapt modules adaptively transfer the hierarchical feature representations from the source task of OARs segmentation to match up with the target (and more challenging) task of PB segmentation, conditioned on the dynamic inter-task associations learned from the learning states of the feed-forward path. On a real-patient dataset, our method led to state-of-the-art results of PB and OARs co-segmentation. Code is available at https://github.com/ladderlab-xjtu/DyAdapt.
Collapse
|
22
|
Padayachee J, Chaudhary S, Shim B, So J, Lim R, Raman S. Utilizing clinical, pathological and radiological information to guide postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:293-305. [PMID: 36795862 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2181795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A detectable and rising PSA following radical prostatectomy is indicative of recurrent prostate cancer. Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) with/without androgen deprivation therapy represents the main treatment option for these patients and has been historically associated with a biochemical control rate of ~70%. To determine the optimal timing, diagnostic workup, radiotherapy dosefractionation, treatment volume, and use of systemic therapy, several informative studies have been conducted in the last decade. AREAS COVERED This review examines the recent evidence to guide radiotherapy decision making in the SRT setting. Key topics include adjuvant vs salvage RT, utilization of molecular imaging and genomic classifiers, length of androgen deprivation therapy, inclusion of elective pelvic volume, and emerging role for hypofractionation. EXPERT OPINION Recently reported trials, conducted in an era prior to the routine use of molecular imaging and genomic classifiers, have been pivotal in establishing the current standard of care for SRT in prostate cancer. However, decisions about radiation treatment and systemic therapy may be tailored based on available prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Data from contemporary clinical trials are awaited to define and establish individualized, biomarker-driven approaches for SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerusha Padayachee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Simone Chaudhary
- Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brian Shim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan So
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Remy Lim
- Mercy PET/CT Epsom, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Radiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Srinivas Raman
- Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Horsley PJ, Koo CM, Eade T, Hsiao E, Emmett L, Brown C, Kneebone A, Hruby G. Mapping of Local Recurrences After Radical Prostatectomy Using 68-Gallium-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: Implications for Postprostatectomy Radiation Therapy Clinical Target Volumes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:106-117. [PMID: 35716849 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our objective is to describe the distribution of local recurrences after radical prostatectomy (RP) as delineated using 68-Gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) to identify areas where current consensus guideline clinical target volumes (CTVs) are insufficient or excessive and to identify predictors of recurrence location within the fossa. METHODS AND MATERIALS Retrospective review of databases from 2 tertiary referral centers was performed to identify patients who underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for biochemical recurrence after RP. Those with a component of local recurrence were included for further analysis. The epicenter of each recurrence was defined relative to reference points in 3 axes, categorized into 1 of 7 levels in the superior/inferior axis relative to the vesicourethral anastomosis, and recorded as within or outside the Faculty of Radiation Oncology Genito-urinary Group (FROGG) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus CTVs. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of recurrence location based on clinical and histopathologic variables. RESULTS One thousand forty-nine 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans were reviewed. One hundred forty sites of local recurrence were identified on 132 scans. Relative to the vesicourethral anastomosis, 13 (9%), 31 (22%), 17 (12%), 24 (17%), 27 (19%), 20 (14%), and 8 (6%) recurrences occurred >5 mm inferior; within 5 mm above or below; and 6 to 15 mm, 16 to 25 mm, 26 to 35 mm, 36 to 45 mm, and >45 mm superiorly, respectively. Thirteen (9%) and 2 (1.4%) recurrences occurred beyond the FROGG and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus CTVs, respectively, with all below the inferior CTV margin. CONCLUSIONS In the largest study to date mapping local recurrences after RP in 3-dimensions, we provide several insights to inform future contouring guidelines; in particular, 9% of recurrences occurred inferior to the FROGG CTV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick J Horsley
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Chung Mo Koo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas Eade
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia; GenesisCare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Edward Hsiao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Brown
- NHMRC Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Kneebone
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia; GenesisCare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - George Hruby
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia; GenesisCare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Confirming and Refining Our Existing Postoperative Treatment Strategies Through the Use of Novel Prostate-Specific Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:118-119. [PMID: 36526378 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
25
|
Laughlin BS, Yu NY, Lo S, Duan J, Welchel Z, Tinnon K, Beckett M, Schild SE, Wong WW, Keole SR, Rwigema JCM, Vargas CE, Rong Y. Clinical Practice Evolvement for Post-Operative Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy-Part 2: Feasibility of Margin Reduction for Fractionated Radiation Treatment with Advanced Image Guidance. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010040. [PMID: 36612040 PMCID: PMC9817842 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Planning target volume (PTV) expansion for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy is typically ≥5 mm. Recent clinical trials have proved the feasibility of a reduced margin of 2−3 mm for treatments on MRI-linac. We aim to study the minimum PTV margin needed using iterative cone-beam CT (iCBCT) as image guidance on conventional linacs. Materials/Methods: Fourteen patients who received post-prostatectomy irradiation (8 with an endorectal balloon and 6 without a balloon) were included in this study. Treatment was delivered with volumetric modulated radiation therapy (VMAT). Fractional dose delivery was evaluated in 165 treatment fractions. The bladder, rectal wall, femoral heads, and prostate bed clinical tumor volume (CTV) were contoured and verified on daily iCBCT. PTV margins (0 mm, 2 mm, and 4 mm) were evaluated on daily iCBCT. CTV coverage and OAR dose parameters were assessed with each PTV margin. Results: CTV D100% was underdosed with a 0 mm margin in 32% of fractions in comparison with 2 mm (6%) and 4 mm (6%) PTV margin (p ≤ 0.001). CTV D95% > 95% was met in 93−94% fractions for all PTV expansions. CTV D95% > 95% was achieved in more patients with an endorectal balloon than those without: 0 mm—90/91 (99%) vs. 63/74 (85%); 2 mm—90/91 (99%) vs. 65/75 (87%); 4 mm—90/90 (100%) vs. 63/73 (86%). There was no difference in absolute median change in CTV D95% (0.32%) for 0-, 2-, and 4 mm margins. The maximum dose remained under 108% for 100% (0 mm), 97% (2 mm), and 98% (4 mm) of images. Rectal wall maximum dose remained under 108% for 100% (0 mm), 100% (2 mm), and 98% (4 mm) of images. Conclusions: With high-quality iCBCT image guidance, PTV margin accounting for inter-fractional uncertainties can be safely reduced for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy. For fractionated radiotherapy, an isotropic expansion of 2 mm and 4 mm may be considered for margin expansion with and without the endorectal balloon. Future application for margin reduction needs to be further evaluated and considered with the advent of shorter post-prostatectomy radiation courses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brady S. Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Nathan Y. Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Stephanie Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Jingwei Duan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
| | - Zachary Welchel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA
- Department of Nuclear and Radiological Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
| | - Katie Tinnon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Mason Beckett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Steven E. Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA
| | - William W. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Sameer R. Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA
| | | | - Carlos E. Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA
- Correspondence: (C.E.V.); (Y.R.)
| | - Yi Rong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA
- Correspondence: (C.E.V.); (Y.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Laughlin BS, Lo S, Vargas CE, DeWees TA, Van der Walt C, Tinnon K, Beckett M, Hobbis D, Schild SE, Wong WW, Keole SR, Rwigema JCM, Yu NY, Clouser E, Rong Y. Clinical Practice Evolvement for Post-Operative Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy-Part 1: Consistent Organs at Risk Management with Advanced Image Guidance. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010016. [PMID: 36612013 PMCID: PMC9817677 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Post-operative prostate cancer patients are treated with full bladder instruction and the use of an endorectal balloon (ERB). We reassessed the efficacy of this practice based on daily image guidance and dose delivery using high-quality iterative reconstructed cone-beam CT (iCBCT). Methods: Fractional dose delivery was calculated on daily iCBCT for 314 fractions from 14 post-operative prostate patients (8 with and 6 without ERB) treated with volumetric modulated radiotherapy (VMAT). All patients were positioned using novel iCBCT during image guidance. The bladder, rectal wall, femoral heads, and prostate bed clinical tumor volume (CTV) were contoured and verified on daily iCBCT. The dose-volume parameters of the contoured organs at risk (OAR) and CTV coverage were assessed for the clinical impact of daily bladder volume variations and the use of ERB. Minimum bladder volume was studied, and a straightforward bladder instruction was explored for easy clinical adoption. Results: A “minimum bladder” contour, the overlap between the original bladder contour and a 15 mm anterior and superior expansion from prostate bed PTV, was confirmed to be effective in identifying cases that might fail a bladder constraint of V65% <60%. The average difference between the maximum and minimum bladder volumes for each patient was 277.1 mL. The daily bladder volumes varied from 62.4 to 590.7 mL and ranged from 29 to 286% of the corresponding planning bladder volume. The bladder constraint of V65% <60% was met in almost all fractions (98%). CTVs (D90%, D95%, and D98%) remained well-covered regardless of the absolute bladder volume daily variation or the presence of the endorectal balloon. Patients with an endorectal balloon showed smaller variation but a higher average maximum rectal wall dose (D0.03mL: 104.3% of the prescription) compared to patients without (103.3%). Conclusions: A “minimum bladder” contour was determined that can be easily generated and followed to ensure sufficient bladder sparing. Further analysis and validation are needed to confirm the utility of the minimal bladder contour. Accurate dose delivery can be achieved for prostate bed target coverage and OAR sparing with or without the use of ERB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brady S. Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Stephanie Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Carlos E. Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Charles Van der Walt
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Katie Tinnon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Mason Beckett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Dean Hobbis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Steven E. Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - William W. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Sameer R. Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Jean-Claude M. Rwigema
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Nathan Y. Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Edward Clouser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Yi Rong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Vogel MME, Düsberg M, Stöhrer L, Dewes S, Sage EK, Borm KJ, Gschwend JE, Eiber M, Combs SE, Schiller K. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-based Lymph Node Atlas for Salvage Radiotherapy in Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Validation of the New NRG Oncology 2020 guideline. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:668-676. [PMID: 36280446 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 20-40% of patients with prostate cancer (PC) who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP) experience relapse, with the majority of these cases developing pelvic lymph node (LN) metastases. Taking new data from the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) era into account, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 2009 contouring guideline for the pelvic LNs from 2009 was updated by the NRG Oncology group in 2020 (NRG 2020). OBJECTIVE To evaluate and validate the updated NRG 2020 guideline with our established LN atlas. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We screened 1653 PSMA PET/computed tomography (CT) data sets for patients with biochemical relapse who underwent a PET scan between November 2012 and November 2017. After screening, we developed an LN atlas using data from 233 patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We evaluated LN overlap (OL) with the RTOG 2009 and NRG 2020 contouring guidelines. OL was defined as within (>90%), partly within (10-90%), or outside (<10%). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS In comparison to the RTOG 2009 guideline, 403 (52%), 134 (17%), and 241 (31%) of the LNs were not, were partly, or were fully covered within the overall group, respectively. By contrast, using the NRG 2020 guideline, 302 (39%), 190 (24%), and 286 (37%) of the LNs were not, were partly, or were fully covered, respectively (p < 0.001). Limitations include the retrospective design with missing data and no histopathological confirmation of the PET results. CONCLUSIONS The updated NRG 2020 contouring guideline improves coverage of the pelvic LNs in patients undergoing salvage radiation therapy. However, PET/CT should be considered whenever possible to ensure coverage of untypical LN spread. PATIENT SUMMARY We compared the 2009 and 2020 guidelines on the radiation area for the pelvis for patients with recurrent prostate cancer that has spread to lymph nodes. The newer guideline provides better coverage of pelvic lymph nodes than the older one and is useful in planning radiation therapy. However, a scan of the pelvis using the newest technique should be considered for individual patients to ensure coverage of untypical lymph nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
| | - Mathias Düsberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Lucia Stöhrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Sabrina Dewes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Eva K Sage
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Kai J Borm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; Institute for Radiation Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung, Munich Partner Site, Munich, Germany
| | - Kilian Schiller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ng M, Guerrieri M, Wong LM, Taubman K, Sutherland T, Benson A, Byrne G, Koschel S, Yap K, Starmans M, Ong G, Macleod C, Foo M, Chao M. Changes in Management After 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET in Patients Undergoing Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy, with Early Biochemical Response Outcomes. J Nucl Med 2022; 63:1343-1348. [PMID: 35058320 PMCID: PMC9454460 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) tracers have increased sensitivity in the detection of prostate cancer, compared with conventional imaging. We assessed the management impact of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) and report early biochemical response in patients who underwent radiation treatment. Methods: One hundred patients were enrolled into a prospective study, with a prior RP for prostate cancer, a PSA of 0.2-2.0 ng/mL, and no prior treatment. All patients underwent diagnostic CT and PSMA PET/CT, and management intent was completed at 3 time points (original, post-CT, and post-PSMA) and compared. Patients who underwent radiotherapy with 6-mo PSA response data are presented. Results: Ninety-eight patients are reported, with a median PSA of 0.32 ng/mL (95% CI, 0.28-0.36), pT3a/b disease in 71.4%, and an International Society of Urological Pathology grade group of at least 3 in 59.2%. PSMA PET/CT detected disease in 46.9% of patients, compared with 15.5% using diagnostic CT (PSMA PET, 29.2% local recurrence and 29.6% pelvic nodal disease). A major change in management intent was higher after PSMA than after CT (12.5% vs. 3.2%, P = 0.010), as was a moderate change in intent (31.3% vs. 13.7%, P = 0.001). The most common change was an increase in the recommendation for elective pelvic radiation (from 15.6% to 33.3%), nodal boost (from 0% to 22.9%), and use of concurrent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (from 22.9% to 41.7%) from original to post-PSMA intent because of detection of nodal disease. Eighty-six patients underwent 18F-DCFPyL-guided radiotherapy. Fifty-five of 86 patients either did not receive ADT or recovered after ADT, with an 18-mo PSA response from 0.32 to 0.02 ng/mL; 94.5% of patients had a PSA of no more than 0.20 ng/mL, and 74.5% had a PSA of no more than 0.03 ng/mL. Conclusion: 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT has a significant impact on management intent in patients being considered for salvage radiotherapy after RP with PSA recurrence. Increased detection of disease, particularly in the pelvic lymph nodes, resulted in increased pelvic irradiation and concurrent ADT use. Early results in patients who are staged with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT show a favorable PSA response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Ng
- GenesisCare St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
| | | | - Lih Ming Wong
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;,Department of Surgery, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kim Taubman
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tom Sutherland
- Department of Medical Imaging, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;,Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Angela Benson
- GenesisCare CancerCare Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Graeme Byrne
- La Trobe University Statistics Consultancy Platform, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sam Koschel
- GenesisCare CancerCare Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kelvin Yap
- Department of Medical Imaging, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Grace Ong
- GenesisCare, Shepparton, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Marcus Foo
- GenesisCare, Berwick, Victoria, Australia; and
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dundee P, Furrer MA, Corcoran NM, Peters J, Pan H, Ballok Z, Ryan A, Guerrieri M, Costello AJ. Defining Prostatic Vascular Pedicle Recurrence and the Anatomy of Local Recurrence of Prostate Cancer on Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 41:116-122. [PMID: 35813255 PMCID: PMC9257633 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The term local recurrence in prostate cancer is considered to mean persistent local disease in the prostatic bed, most commonly at the site of the vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA). Since the introduction of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of early biochemical recurrence (BCR), we have found histologically confirmed prostate cancer in the prostatic vascular pedicle (PVP). If a significant proportion of local recurrences are distant to the VUA, it may be possible to alter adjuvant and salvage radiation fields in order to reduce the potential morbidity of radiation in selected patients. Objective To describe PVP local recurrence and to map the anatomic pattern of prostate bed recurrence on PSMA PET/CT. Design, setting, and participants This was a retrospective multicentre study of 185 patients imaged with PSMA PET/CT following radical prostatectomy (RP) between January 2016 and November 2018. All patient data and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected. Recurrences were documented according to anatomic location. For patients presenting with local recurrence, the precise location of the recurrence within the prostate bed was documented. Intervention PSMA PET/CT for BCR following RP. Results and limitations A total of 43 local recurrences in 41/185 patients (22%) were identified. Tumour recurrence at the PVP was found in 26 (63%), VUA in 15 (37%), and within a retained seminal vesicle and along the anterior rectal wall in the region of the neurovascular bundle in one (2.4%) each. Histological and surgical evidence of PVP recurrence was acquired in two patients. The study is limited by its retrospective nature with inherent selection bias. This is an observational study reporting on the anatomy of local recurrence and does not include follow-up for patient outcomes. Conclusions Our study showed that prostate cancer can recur in the PVP and is distant to the VUA more commonly than previously thought. This may have implications for RP technique and for the treatment of selected patients in the local recurrence setting. Patient summary We investigated more precise identification of the location of tumour recurrence after removal of the prostate for prostate cancer. We describe a new definition of local recurrence in an area called the prostatic vascular pedicle. This new concept may alter the treatment recommended for recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Dundee
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street Parkville, Australia 3052
- The Australian Medical Robotics Academy, North Melbourne, Australia
- Australian Prostate Cancer Centre, North Melbourne, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
- Corresponding author. Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Tel. +61 3 9342 7294.
| | - Marc A. Furrer
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street Parkville, Australia 3052
- The Australian Medical Robotics Academy, North Melbourne, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Niall M. Corcoran
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street Parkville, Australia 3052
- Australian Prostate Cancer Centre, North Melbourne, Australia
| | - Justin Peters
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street Parkville, Australia 3052
- The Australian Medical Robotics Academy, North Melbourne, Australia
- Australian Prostate Cancer Centre, North Melbourne, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Henry Pan
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Andrew Ryan
- Healthcare Imaging Services, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Anthony J. Costello
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street Parkville, Australia 3052
- The Australian Medical Robotics Academy, North Melbourne, Australia
- Australian Prostate Cancer Centre, North Melbourne, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
A Phase I Trial of Highly Conformal, Hypofractionated Post-Prostatectomy Radiotherapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:101024. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
31
|
Achard V, Jaccard M, Vanhoutte F, Siva S, Heikkilä R, Dirix P, Liefhooghe N, Otte FX, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Berghen C, Shelan M, Conde-Moreno A, Campos FL, Papachristofilou A, Guckenberger M, Meersschout S, Putora PM, Zwahlen D, Couñago F, Scorsetti M, Eito C, Barrado M, Zapatero A, Muto P, Van De Voorde L, Lamanna G, Koutsouvelis N, Dipasquale G, Ost P, Zilli T. Oligorecurrent nodal prostate cancer: radiotherapy quality assurance of the randomized PEACE V-STORM phase II trial. Radiother Oncol 2022; 172:1-9. [PMID: 35476942 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Aim of this study is to report the results of the radiotherapy quality assurance program of the PEACE V-STORM randomized phase II trial for pelvic nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIAL AND METHODS A benchmark case (BC) consisting of a postoperative case with 2 nodal recurrences was used for both stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT, 30 Gy/3 fx) and whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT, 45 Gy/25 fx + SIB boost to 65 Gy). RESULTS BC of 24 centers were analyzed. The overall grading for delineation variation of the 1st BC was rated as 'UV' (Unacceptable Variation) or 'AV' (Acceptable Variation) for 1 and 7 centers for SBRT (33%), and 3 and 8 centers for WPRT (46%), respectively. An inadequate upper limit of the WPRT CTV (n=2), a missing delineation of the prostate bed (n=1), and a missing nodal target volume (n=1 for SBRT and WPRT) constituted the observed 'UV'. With the 2nd BC (n=11), the overall delineation review showed 2 and 8 'AV' for SBRT and WPRT, respectively, with no 'UV'. For the plan review of the 2nd BC, all treatment plans were per protocol for WPRT. SBRT plans showed variability in dose normalization (Median D90% = 30.1 Gy, range 22.9-33.2Gy and 30.6 Gy, range 26.8-34.2Gy for nodes 1 and 2 respectively). CONCLUSIONS Up to 46% of protocol deviations were observed in delineation of WPRT for nodal oligorecurrent PCa, while dosimetric results of SBRT showed the greatest disparities between centers. Repeated BC resulted in an improved adherence to the protocol, translating in an overall acceptable contouring and planning compliance rate among participating centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vérane Achard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maud Jaccard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frederik Vanhoutte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Shankar Siva
- EJ Whitten Foundation Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Reino Heikkilä
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Kankernetwerk, Antwerp, Belgium and University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Nick Liefhooghe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - François-Xavier Otte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jules Bordet Institute and Hôpital Erasme, University Clinics of Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital (Biocruces Health Research Institute), Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Charlien Berghen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antonio Conde-Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Fernando López Campos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Paul Martin Putora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Zwahlen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Quironsalud, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, IRCSS, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Clara Eito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto Oncólogico Clinica Universitaria IMQ, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Marta Barrado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paolo Muto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Napoli Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Giorgio Lamanna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Giovanna Dipasquale
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Human structure and repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
van Gysen K, Kneebone A, Le A, Wu K, Haworth A, Bromley R, Hruby G, O'Toole J, Booth J, Brown C, Pearse M, Sidhom M, Wiltshire K, Tang C, Eade T. Evaluating the utility of knowledge-based planning for clinical trials using the TROG 08.03 post prostatectomy radiation therapy planning data. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 22:91-97. [PMID: 35602546 PMCID: PMC9117914 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
33
|
Renard-Penna R, Zhang-Yin J, Montagne S, Aupin L, Bruguière E, Labidi M, Latorzeff I, Hennequin C. Targeting Local Recurrence After Surgery With MRI Imaging for Prostate Cancer in the Setting of Salvage Radiation Therapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:775387. [PMID: 35242702 PMCID: PMC8887697 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.775387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is being increasingly used for imaging suspected recurrence in prostate cancer therapy. Functional MRI with diffusion and perfusion imaging has the potential to demonstrate local recurrence even at low PSA value. Detection of recurrence can modify the management of postprostatectomy biochemical recurrence. MRI scan acquired before salvage radiotherapy is useful for the localization of recurrent tumors and also in the delineation of the target volume. The objective of this review is to assess the role and potential impact of MRI in targeting local recurrence after surgery for prostate cancer in the setting of salvage radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphaële Renard-Penna
- Academic Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Jules Zhang-Yin
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Tenon Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
| | - Sarah Montagne
- Academic Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laurene Aupin
- Academic Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Eric Bruguière
- Department of Imaging, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Mouna Labidi
- Department of Oncology, Saint-Louis Hospital, Université de Paris, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Igor Latorzeff
- Department of Radiotherapy, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Christophe Hennequin
- Department of Oncology, Saint-Louis Hospital, Université de Paris, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on external radiotherapy of prostate cancer. External radiotherapy is intended for all localized prostate cancers, and more recently for oligometastatic prostate cancers. The irradiation techniques are detailed. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with prostate image-guided radiotherapy is the recommended technique. A total dose of 74 to 80Gy is recommended in case of standard fractionation (2Gy per fraction). Moderate hypofractionation (total dose of 60Gy at a rate of 3Gy per fraction over 4 weeks) in the prostate has become a standard of therapy. Simultaneous integrated boost techniques can be used to treat lymph node areas. Extreme hypofractionation (35 to 40Gy in five fractions) using stereotactic body radiotherapy can be considered a therapeutic option to treat exclusively the prostate. The postoperative irradiation technique, indicated mainly in case of biological recurrence and lymph node involvement, is detailed.
Collapse
|
35
|
Balagopal A, Morgan H, Dohopolski M, Timmerman R, Shan J, Heitjan DF, Liu W, Nguyen D, Hannan R, Garant A, Desai N, Jiang S. PSA-Net: Deep learning-based physician style-aware segmentation network for postoperative prostate cancer clinical target volumes. Artif Intell Med 2021; 121:102195. [PMID: 34763810 DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Automatic segmentation of medical images with deep learning (DL) algorithms has proven highly successful in recent times. With most of these automation networks, inter-observer variation is an acknowledged problem that leads to suboptimal results. This problem is even more significant in segmenting postoperative clinical target volumes (CTV) because they lack a macroscopic visible tumor in the image. This study, using postoperative prostate CTV segmentation as the test case, tries to determine 1) whether physician styles are consistent and learnable, 2) whether physician style affects treatment outcome and toxicity, and 3) how to explicitly deal with different physician styles in DL-assisted CTV segmentation to facilitate its clinical acceptance. METHODS A dataset of 373 postoperative prostate cancer patients from UT Southwestern Medical Center was used for this study. We used another 83 patients from Mayo Clinic to validate the developed model and its adaptability. To determine whether physician styles are consistent and learnable, we trained a 3D convolutional neural network classifier to identify which physician had contoured a CTV from just the contour and the corresponding CT scan. Next, we evaluated whether adapting automatic segmentation to specific physician styles would be clinically feasible based on a lack of difference between outcomes. Here, biochemical progression-free survival (BCFS) and grade 3+ genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between physician styles with the log rank test and subsequently with a multivariate Cox regression. When we found no statistically significant differences in outcome or toxicity between contouring styles, we proposed a concept called physician style-aware (PSA) segmentation by developing an encoder-multidecoder network with perceptual loss to model different physician styles of CTV segmentation. RESULTS The classification network captured the different physician styles with 87% accuracy. Subsequent outcome analysis showed no differences in BCFS and grade 3+ toxicity among physicians. With the proposed physician style-aware network (PSA-Net), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) accuracy for all physicians was 3.4% higher on average than with a general model that does not differentiate physician styles. We show that these stylistic contouring variations also exist between institutions that follow the same segmentation guidelines, and we show the proposed method's effectiveness in adapting to new institutional styles. We observed an accuracy improvement of 5% in terms of DSC when adapting to the style of a separate institution. CONCLUSION The performance of the classification network established that physician styles are learnable, and the lack of difference between outcomes among physicians shows that the network can feasibly adapt to different styles in the clinic. Therefore, we developed a novel PSA-Net model that can produce contours specific to the treating physician, thus improving segmentation accuracy and avoiding the need to train multiple models to achieve different style segmentations. We successfully validated this model on data from a separate institution, thus supporting the model's generalizability to diverse datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjali Balagopal
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Howard Morgan
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Michael Dohopolski
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ramsey Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jie Shan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Daniel F Heitjan
- Department of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Dan Nguyen
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Aurelie Garant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Neil Desai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Steve Jiang
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
le Guevelou J, Achard V, Mainta I, Zaidi H, Garibotto V, Latorzeff I, Sargos P, Ménard C, Zilli T. PET/CT-Based Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Impact on Treatment Management and Future Directions. Front Oncol 2021; 11:742093. [PMID: 34532294 PMCID: PMC8438304 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.742093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Biochemical recurrence is a clinical situation experienced by 20 to 40% of prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). Prostate bed (PB) radiation therapy (RT) remains the mainstay salvage treatment, although it remains non-curative for up to 30% of patients developing further recurrence. Positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) using prostate cancer-targeting radiotracers has emerged in the last decade as a new-generation imaging technique characterized by a better restaging accuracy compared to conventional imaging. By adapting targeting of recurrence sites and modulating treatment management, implementation in clinical practice of restaging PET/CT is challenging the established therapeutic standards born from randomized controlled trials. This article reviews the potential impact of restaging PET/CT on changes in the management of recurrent prostate cancer after RP. Based on PET/CT findings, it addresses potential adaptation of RT target volumes and doses, as well as use of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). However, the impact of such management changes on the oncological outcomes of PET/CT-based salvage RT strategies is as yet unknown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer le Guevelou
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Vérane Achard
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ismini Mainta
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Diagnostic Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Habib Zaidi
- Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Diagnostic Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Geneva Neuroscience Center, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Valentina Garibotto
- Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Diagnostic Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Geneva Neuroscience Center, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Igor Latorzeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Groupe Oncorad-Garonne, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Cynthia Ménard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
68Ga-PSMA-PET screening and transponder-guided salvage radiotherapy to the prostate bed alone for biochemical recurrence following prostatectomy: interim outcomes of a phase II trial. World J Urol 2021; 39:4117-4125. [PMID: 34076753 PMCID: PMC8571130 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03735-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate outcomes for men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer who were selected for transponder-guided salvage radiotherapy (SRT) to the prostate bed alone by 68Ga-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (68Ga-PSMA-PET). Methods This is a single-arm, prospective study of men with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level rising to 0.1–2.5 ng/mL following radical prostatectomy. Patients were staged with 68Ga-PSMA-PET and those with a negative finding, or a positive finding localised to the prostate bed, continued to SRT only to the prostate bed alone with real-time target-tracking using electromagnetic transponders. The primary endpoint was freedom from biochemical relapse (FFBR, PSA > 0.2 ng/mL from the post-radiotherapy nadir). Secondary endpoints were time to biochemical relapse, toxicity and patient-reported quality of life (QoL). Results Ninety-two patients (median PSA of 0.18 ng/ml, IQR 0.12–0.36), were screened with 68Ga-PSMA-PET and metastatic disease was found in 20 (21.7%) patients. Sixty-nine of 72 non-metastatic patients elected to proceed with SRT. At the interim (3-year) analysis, 32 (46.4%) patients (95% CI 34.3–58.8%) were FFBR. The median time to biochemical relapse was 16.1 months. The rate of FFBR was 82.4% for ISUP grade-group 2 patients. Rates of grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity were 0% and 15.2%, respectively. General health and disease-specific QoL remained stable. Conclusion Pre-SRT 68Ga-PSMA-PET scans detect metastatic disease in a proportion of patients at low PSA levels but fail to improve FFBR. Transponder-guided SRT to the prostate bed alone is associated with a favourable toxicity profile and preserved QoL. Trial registration number ACTRN12615001183572, 03/11/2015, retrospectively registered. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03735-0.
Collapse
|
38
|
Xu X, Lian C, Wang S, Zhu T, Chen RC, Wang AZ, Royce TJ, Yap PT, Shen D, Lian J. Asymmetric multi-task attention network for prostate bed segmentation in computed tomography images. Med Image Anal 2021; 72:102116. [PMID: 34217953 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Post-prostatectomy radiotherapy requires accurate annotation of the prostate bed (PB), i.e., the residual tissue after the operative removal of the prostate gland, to minimize side effects on surrounding organs-at-risk (OARs). However, PB segmentation in computed tomography (CT) images is a challenging task, even for experienced physicians. This is because PB is almost a "virtual" target with non-contrast boundaries and highly variable shapes depending on neighboring OARs. In this work, we propose an asymmetric multi-task attention network (AMTA-Net) for the concurrent segmentation of PB and surrounding OARs. Our AMTA-Net mimics experts in delineating the non-contrast PB by explicitly leveraging its critical dependency on the neighboring OARs (i.e., the bladder and rectum), which are relatively easy to distinguish in CT images. Specifically, we first adopt a U-Net as the backbone network for the low-level (or prerequisite) task of the OAR segmentation. Then, we build an attention sub-network upon the backbone U-Net with a series of cascaded attention modules, which can hierarchically transfer the OAR features and adaptively learn discriminative representations for the high-level (or primary) task of the PB segmentation. We comprehensively evaluate the proposed AMTA-Net on a clinical dataset composed of 186 CT images. According to the experimental results, our AMTA-Net significantly outperforms current clinical state-of-the-arts (i.e., atlas-based segmentation methods), indicating the value of our method in reducing time and labor in the clinical workflow. Our AMTA-Net also presents better performance than the technical state-of-the-arts (i.e., the deep learning-based segmentation methods), especially for the most indistinguishable and clinically critical part of the PB boundaries. Source code is released at https://github.com/superxuang/amta-net.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuanang Xu
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Chunfeng Lian
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710049, China
| | - Shuai Wang
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; School of Mechanical, Electrical and Information Engineering, Shandong University, Weihai, Shandong 264209, China
| | - Tong Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Ronald C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Andrew Z Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Trevor J Royce
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Pew-Thian Yap
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Dinggang Shen
- School of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China; Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200030, China; Department of Artificial Intelligence, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
| | - Jun Lian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Balagopal A, Nguyen D, Morgan H, Weng Y, Dohopolski M, Lin MH, Barkousaraie AS, Gonzalez Y, Garant A, Desai N, Hannan R, Jiang S. A deep learning-based framework for segmenting invisible clinical target volumes with estimated uncertainties for post-operative prostate cancer radiotherapy. Med Image Anal 2021; 72:102101. [PMID: 34111573 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
In post-operative radiotherapy for prostate cancer, precisely contouring the clinical target volume (CTV) to be irradiated is challenging, because the cancerous prostate gland has been surgically removed, so the CTV encompasses the microscopic spread of tumor cells, which cannot be visualized in clinical images like computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. In current clinical practice, physicians' segment CTVs manually based on their relationship with nearby organs and other clinical information, but this allows large inter-physician variability. Automating post-operative prostate CTV segmentation with traditional image segmentation methods has yielded suboptimal results. We propose using deep learning to accurately segment post-operative prostate CTVs. The model proposed is trained using labels that were clinically approved and used for patient treatment. To segment the CTV, we segment nearby organs first, then use their relationship with the CTV to assist CTV segmentation. To ease the encoding of distance-based features, which are important for learning both the CTV contours' overlap with the surrounding OARs and the distance from their borders, we add distance prediction as an auxiliary task to the CTV network. To make the DL model practical for clinical use, we use Monte Carlo dropout (MCDO) to estimate model uncertainty. Using MCDO, we estimate and visualize the 95% upper and lower confidence bounds for each prediction which informs the physicians of areas that might require correction. The model proposed achieves an average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.87 on a holdout test dataset, much better than established methods, such as atlas-based methods (DSC<0.7). The predicted contours agree with physician contours better than medical resident contours do. A reader study showed that the clinical acceptability of the automatically segmented CTV contours is equal to that of approved clinical contours manually drawn by physicians. Our deep learning model can accurately segment CTVs with the help of surrounding organ masks. Because the DL framework can outperform residents, it can be implemented practically in a clinical workflow to generate initial CTV contours or to guide residents in generating these contours for physicians to review and revise. Providing physicians with the 95% confidence bounds could streamline the review process for an efficient clinical workflow as this would enable physicians to concentrate their inspecting and editing efforts on the large uncertain areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjali Balagopal
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Dan Nguyen
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Howard Morgan
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Yaochung Weng
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Michael Dohopolski
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Mu-Han Lin
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Azar Sadeghnejad Barkousaraie
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Yesenia Gonzalez
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Aurelie Garant
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Neil Desai
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Steve Jiang
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Robin S, Jolicoeur M, Palumbo S, Zilli T, Crehange G, De Hertogh O, Derashodian T, Sargos P, Salembier C, Supiot S, Udrescu C, Chapet O. Prostate Bed Delineation Guidelines for Postoperative Radiation Therapy: On Behalf Of The Francophone Group of Urological Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 109:1243-1253. [PMID: 33186618 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate bed (PB) irradiation is considered the standard postoperative treatment after radical prostatectomy (RP) for tumors with high-risk features or persistent prostate-specific antigen, or for salvage treatment in case of biological relapse. Four consensus guidelines have been published to standardize practices and reduce the interobserver variability in PB delineation but with discordant recommendations. To improve the reproducibility in the PB delineation, the Francophone Group of Urological Radiotherapy (Groupe Francophone de Radiothérapie Urologique [GFRU]) worked to propose a new and more reproducible consensus guideline for PB clinical target volume (CTV) definition. METHODS AND MATERIALS A 4-step procedure was used. First, a group of 10 GFRU prostate experts evaluated the 4 existing delineation guidelines for postoperative radiation therapy (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer; the Faculty of Radiation Oncology Genito-Urinary Group; the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; and the Princess Margaret Hospital) to identify divergent issues. Second, data sets of 50 magnetic resonance imaging studies (25 after RP and 25 with an intact prostate gland) were analyzed to identify the relevant anatomic boundaries of the PB. Third, a literature review of surgical, anatomic, histologic, and imaging data was performed to identify the relevant PB boundaries. Fourth, a final consensus on PB CTV definition was reached among experts. RESULTS Definitive limits of the PB CTV delineation were defined using easily visible landmarks on computed tomography scans (CT). The purpose was to ensure a better reproducibility of PB definition for any radiation oncologist even without experience in postoperative radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS New recommendations for PB delineation based on simple anatomic boundaries and available as a CT image atlas are proposed by the GFRU. Improvement in uniformity in PB CTV definition and treatment homogeneity in the context of clinical trials are expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Robin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Center Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| | - Marjory Jolicoeur
- Radiation Oncology Department, Charles LeMoyne Hospital, CISSS Montérégie-center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Samuel Palumbo
- Radiation Oncology Department, CHU UCL Namur - Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Gilles Crehange
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Olivier De Hertogh
- Radiation Oncology Department, CHR Verviers East Belgium, Verviers, Belgium
| | - Talar Derashodian
- Radiation Oncology Department, Charles LeMoyne Hospital, CISSS Montérégie-center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Paul Sargos
- Radiation Oncology Department, Jewish General Hospital, McGill, Montreal, Canada
| | - Carl Salembier
- Department of Radiotherapy, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes Saint-Herblain, France; CRCINA CNRS Inserm, University of Nantes and Angers, Nantes, France
| | - Corina Udrescu
- Radiation Oncology Department, Center Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| | - Olivier Chapet
- Radiation Oncology Department, Center Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Vogel MME, Dewes S, Sage EK, Devecka M, Gschwend JE, Schiller K, Combs SE. Patterns of care for prostate cancer radiotherapy-results from a survey among German-speaking radiation oncologists. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:962-970. [PMID: 33506347 PMCID: PMC8547211 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01738-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Emerging moderately hypofractionated and ultra-hypofractionated schemes for radiotherapy (RT) of prostate cancer (PC) have resulted in various treatment options. The aim of this survey was to evaluate recent patterns of care of German-speaking radiation oncologists for RT of PC. Methods We developed an online survey which we distributed via e‑mail to all registered members of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO). The survey was completed by 109 participants between March 3 and April 3, 2020. For evaluation of radiation dose, we used the equivalent dose at fractionation of 2 Gy with α/β = 1.5 Gy, equivalent dose (EQD2 [1.5 Gy]). Results Median EQD2(1.5 Gy) for definitive RT of the prostate is 77.60 Gy (range: 64.49–84.00) with median single doses (SD) of 2.00 Gy (range: 1.80–3.00), while for postoperative RT of the prostate bed, median EQD2(1.5 Gy) is 66.00 Gy (range: 60.00–74.00) with median SD of 2.00 Gy (range: 1.80–2.00). For definitive RT, the pelvic lymph nodes (LNs) are treated in case of suspect findings in imaging (82.6%) and/or according to risk formulas/tables (78.0%). In the postoperative setting, 78.9% use imaging and 78.0% use the postoperative tumor stage for LN irradiation. In the definitive and postoperative situation, LNs are irradiated with a median EQD2(1.5 Gy) of 47.52 Gy with a range of 42.43–66.00 and 41.76–62.79, respectively. Conclusion German-speaking radiation oncologists’ patterns of care for patients with PC are mainly in line with the published data and treatment recommendation guidelines. However, dose prescription is highly heterogenous for RT of the prostate/prostate bed, while the dose to the pelvic LNs is mainly consistent. Supplementary Information The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-020-01738-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco M. E. Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Sabrina Dewes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Eva K. Sage
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Michal Devecka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen E. Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Kilian Schiller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
- Partner Site Munich, Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rans K, Berghen C, Joniau S, De Meerleer G. Salvage Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:156-162. [PMID: 32035581 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Revised: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
For patients experiencing biochemical recurrence in the absence of distant metastasis, salvage radiotherapy (SRT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is currently the only possible curative treatment option. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) monitoring and the selected use of SRT has some advantages when compared with adjuvant radiotherapy. The most important one is avoidance of a potential overtreatment of patients who would never have disease progression, even in the presence of high-risk pathological features. The identification of a specific PSA cut-off seems to be incorrect. In patients with more adverse pathological features, early SRT administered at the very first sign of a PSA rise granted better disease control. Dose-intensified SRT is feasible and well tolerated with no significant difference in grade 2 or more acute and late toxicity. At least 66 Gy must be given in the salvage setting. ADT has a radio-sensitising effect on the radiotherapy by inhibiting the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. The use of ADT in the salvage setting results in a better oncological outcome. Hormonal therapy is associated with a decrease in quality of life and side-effects depending on the duration of hormone therapy. The oncological benefit of hormone therapy duration depends on their clinical and pathological characteristics. 68-Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography is the gold standard in staging prostate cancer patients with biochemical persistence or recurrence after radical prostatectomy. The implementation of 18F-labelled PSMA tracers can provide a further improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Rans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - C Berghen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kneebone A, Fraser-Browne C, Duchesne GM, Fisher R, Frydenberg M, Herschtal A, Williams SG, Brown C, Delprado W, Haworth A, Joseph DJ, Martin JM, Matthews JHL, Millar JL, Sidhom M, Spry N, Tang CI, Turner S, Wiltshire KL, Woo HH, Davis ID, Lim TS, Pearse M. Adjuvant radiotherapy versus early salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy (TROG 08.03/ANZUP RAVES): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:1331-1340. [PMID: 33002437 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30456-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 188] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant radiotherapy has been shown to halve the risk of biochemical progression for patients with high-risk disease after radical prostatectomy. Early salvage radiotherapy could result in similar biochemical control with lower treatment toxicity. We aimed to compare biochemical progression between patients given adjuvant radiotherapy and those given salvage radiotherapy. METHODS We did a phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial across 32 oncology centres in Australia and New Zealand. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years and had undergone a radical prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate with pathological staging showing high-risk features defined as positive surgical margins, extraprostatic extension, or seminal vesicle invasion; had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and had a postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration of 0·10 ng/mL or less. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a minimisation technique via an internet-based, independently generated allocation to either adjuvant radiotherapy within 6 months of radical prostatectomy or early salvage radiotherapy triggered by a PSA of 0·20 ng/mL or more. Allocation sequence was concealed from investigators and patients, but treatment assignment for individual randomisations was not masked. Patients were stratified by radiotherapy centre, preoperative PSA, Gleason score, surgical margin status, and seminal vesicle invasion status. Radiotherapy in both groups was 64 Gy in 32 fractions to the prostate bed without androgen deprivation therapy with real-time review of plan quality on all cases before treatment. The primary endpoint was freedom from biochemical progression. Salvage radiotherapy would be deemed non-inferior to adjuvant radiotherapy if freedom from biochemical progression at 5 years was within 10% of that for adjuvant radiotherapy with a hazard ratio (HR) for salvage radiotherapy versus adjuvant radiotherapy of 1·48. The primary analysis was done on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00860652. FINDINGS Between March 27, 2009, and Dec 31, 2015, 333 patients were randomly assigned (166 to adjuvant radiotherapy; 167 to salvage radiotherapy). Median follow-up was 6·1 years (IQR 4·3-7·5). An independent data monitoring committee recommended premature closure of enrolment because of unexpectedly low event rates. 84 (50%) patients in the salvage radiotherapy group had radiotherapy triggered by a PSA of 0·20 ng/mL or more. 5-year freedom from biochemical progression was 86% (95% CI 81-92) in the adjuvant radiotherapy group versus 87% (82-93) in the salvage radiotherapy group (stratified HR 1·12, 95% CI 0·65-1·90; pnon-inferiority=0·15). The grade 2 or worse genitourinary toxicity rate was lower in the salvage radiotherapy group (90 [54%] of 167) than in the adjuvant radiotherapy group (116 [70%] of 166). The grade 2 or worse gastrointestinal toxicity rate was similar between the salvage radiotherapy group (16 [10%]) and the adjuvant radiotherapy group (24 [14%]). INTERPRETATION Salvage radiotherapy did not meet trial specified criteria for non-inferiority. However, these data support the use of salvage radiotherapy as it results in similar biochemical control to adjuvant radiotherapy, spares around half of men from pelvic radiation, and is associated with significantly lower genitourinary toxicity. FUNDING New Zealand Health Research Council, Australian National Health Medical Research Council, Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Council NSW, Auckland Hospital Charitable Trust, Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Seed Funding, Cancer Research Trust New Zealand, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, Cancer Institute NSW, Prostate Cancer Foundation Australia, and Cancer Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Kneebone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | | | - Gillian M Duchesne
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard Fisher
- Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Cabrini Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alan Herschtal
- Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Scott G Williams
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Chris Brown
- National Health and Medical Research Council, Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Warick Delprado
- Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Annette Haworth
- School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David J Joseph
- University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia; Genesis Cancer Care, Perth, WA, Australia; 5D Clinics, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Jarad M Martin
- Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Jeremy L Millar
- Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mark Sidhom
- Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nigel Spry
- Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia; Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia; Genesis Cancer Care, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Colin I Tang
- Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia; Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Sandra Turner
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsty L Wiltshire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Henry H Woo
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Urology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Wahroonga, NSW Australia
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Eastern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tee S Lim
- Genesis Cancer Care, Perth, WA, Australia; Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Xu X, Lian C, Wang S, Wang A, Royce T, Chen R, Lian J, Shen D. Asymmetrical Multi-task Attention U-Net for the Segmentation of Prostate Bed in CT Image. MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION : MICCAI ... INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION 2020; 12264:470-479. [PMID: 34179897 PMCID: PMC8221064 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59719-1_46] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Segmentation of the prostate bed, the residual tissue after the removal of the prostate gland, is an essential prerequisite for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy but also a challenging task due to its non-contrast boundaries and highly variable shapes relying on neighboring organs. In this work, we propose a novel deep learning-based method to automatically segment this "invisible target". As the main idea of our design, we expect to get reference from the surrounding normal structures (bladder&rectum) and take advantage of this information to facilitate the prostate bed segmentation. To achieve this goal, we first use a U-Net as the backbone network to perform the bladder&rectum segmentation, which serves as a low-level task that can provide references to the high-level task of the prostate bed segmentation. Based on the backbone network, we build a novel attention network with a series of cascaded attention modules to further extract discriminative features for the high-level prostate bed segmentation task. Since the attention network has one-sided dependency on the backbone network, simulating the clinical workflow to use normal structures to guide the segmentation of radiotherapy target, we name the final composition model asymmetrical multi-task attention U-Net. Extensive experiments on a clinical dataset consisting of 186 CT images demonstrate the effectiveness of this new design and the superior performance of the model in comparison to the conventional atlas-based methods for prostate bed segmentation. The source code is publicly available at https://github.com/superxuang/amta-net.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuanang Xu
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Chunfeng Lian
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Shuai Wang
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Andrew Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Trevor Royce
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Ronald Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Jun Lian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Dinggang Shen
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Berghen C, Joniau S, Laenen A, Devos G, Rans K, Goffin K, Haustermans K, Meerleer GD. Long- versus short-term androgen deprivation therapy with high-dose radiotherapy for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Future Oncol 2020; 16:2035-2044. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Radical prostatectomy is a well-established treatment option in the management of localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. An extended lymphadenectomy is performed in case of substantial risk for lymph node involvement. When biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurs, salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is performed. The benefit in terms of BCR-free survival (FS) and metastasis-FS by adding 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared with SRT only has already been established. Retrospective evidence suggests that a longer schedule of ADT may be more beneficial compared with 6 months. This multicenter open-label randomized trial will include patients who need SRT after experiencing BCR post-radical prostatectomy with lymphadenectomy and pN0-status. Patients will be randomized for ADT duration (6 vs 24 months). Primary end point is distant metastasis-FS. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04242017 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Annouschka Laenen
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics & Statistical Bioinformatics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gaetan Devos
- Department of Urology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kato Rans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
De Bruycker A, Spiessens A, Dirix P, Koutsouvelis N, Semac I, Liefhooghe N, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Everaerts W, Otte F, Papachristofilou A, Scorsetti M, Shelan M, Siva S, Ameye F, Guckenberger M, Heikkilä R, Putora PM, Zapatero A, Conde-Moreno A, Couñago F, Vanhoutte F, Goetghebeur E, Reynders D, Zilli T, Ost P. PEACE V - Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM): a study protocol for a randomized controlled phase II trial. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:406. [PMID: 32398040 PMCID: PMC7216526 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06911-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelvic nodal recurrences are being increasingly diagnosed with the introduction of new molecular imaging techniques, like choline and PSMA PET-CT, in the restaging of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). At this moment, there are no specific treatment recommendations for patients with limited nodal recurrences and different locoregional treatment approaches are currently being used, mostly by means of metastasis-directed therapies (MDT): salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Since the majority of patients treated with MDT relapse within 2 years in adjacent lymph node regions, with an estimated median time to progression of 12-18 months, combining MDT with whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) may improve oncological outcomes in these patients. The aim of this prospective multicentre randomized controlled phase II trial is to assess the impact of the addition of WPRT to MDT and short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on metastasis-free survival (MFS) in the setting of oligorecurrent pelvic nodal recurrence. METHODS & DESIGN Patients diagnosed with PET-detected pelvic nodal oligorecurrence (≤5 nodes) following radical local treatment for PCa, will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio between arm A: MDT and 6 months of ADT, or arm B: WPRT added to MDT and 6 months of ADT. Patients will be stratified by type of PET-tracer (choline, FACBC or PSMA) and by type of MDT (sLND or SBRT). The primary endpoint is MFS and the secondary endpoints include clinical and biochemical progression-free survival (PFS), prostate cancer specific survival, quality of life (QoL), toxicity and time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and to palliative ADT. Estimated study completion: December 31, 2023. DISCUSSION This is the first prospective multicentre randomized phase II trial assessing the potential of combined WPRT and MDT as compared to MDT alone on MFS for patients with nodal oligorecurrent PCa. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03569241, registered June 14, 2018, ; Identifier on Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal (SNCTP): SNCTP000002947, registered June 14, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A De Bruycker
- Department of Radiation oncology and experimental cancer research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - A Spiessens
- Department of Radiation oncology and experimental cancer research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - P Dirix
- Department of Radiation oncology, Iridium Cancer Network, GZ Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - N Koutsouvelis
- Department of Radiation oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - I Semac
- Department of Radiation oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
- Clinical Research Center, Geneva University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - N Liefhooghe
- Department of Radiation oncology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - A Gomez-Iturriaga
- Cruces University Hospital (Biocruces Health Research Institute), Barakaldo, Spain
| | - W Everaerts
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - F Otte
- Department of Radiation oncology, Jules Bordet Institute and Hôpital Erasme, University Clinics of Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Papachristofilou
- Clinic of Radiotherapy & Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Scorsetti
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, IRCSS, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - M Shelan
- Department of Radiation oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - S Siva
- Epworth Healthcare, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - F Ameye
- Department of Urology, AZ Maria-Middelares Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - R Heikkilä
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - P M Putora
- Department of Radiation oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - A Zapatero
- University Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Conde-Moreno
- Department of Radiation oncology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - F Couñago
- Department of Radiation oncology, University Hospital of Quirón, Madrid, Spain
| | - F Vanhoutte
- Department of Radiation oncology and experimental cancer research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - E Goetghebeur
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - D Reynders
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - T Zilli
- Department of Radiation oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - P Ost
- Department of Radiation oncology and experimental cancer research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Impact of advanced radiotherapy techniques and dose intensification on toxicity of salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Sci Rep 2020; 10:114. [PMID: 31924839 PMCID: PMC6954263 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-57056-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The safety and efficacy of dose-escalated radiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) remain unclear in salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after radical prostatectomy. We examined the impact of these advanced radiotherapy techniques and dose intensification on the toxicity of SRT. This multi-institutional retrospective study included 421 patients who underwent SRT at the median dose of 66 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. IMRT and IGRT were used for 225 (53%) and 321 (76%) patients, respectively. At the median follow-up of 50 months, the cumulative incidence of late grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities was 4.8% and 24%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the non-use of either IMRT or IGRT, or both (hazard ratio [HR] 3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-5.4, p < 0.001) and use of whole-pelvic radiotherapy (HR 7.6, CI 1.0-56, p = 0.048) were associated with late GI toxicity, whereas a higher dose ≥68 Gy was the only factor associated with GU toxicities (HR 3.1, CI 1.3-7.4, p = 0.012). This study suggested that the incidence of GI toxicities can be reduced by IMRT and IGRT in SRT, whereas dose intensification may increase GU toxicity even with these advanced techniques.
Collapse
|
48
|
Bell LJ, Eade T, Hruby G, Bromley R, Kneebone A. Implementing daily soft tissue image guidance with reduced margins for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy: research-based changes to clinical practice. J Med Radiat Sci 2019; 66:259-268. [PMID: 31680490 PMCID: PMC6920694 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2019] [Revised: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We have previously demonstrated that daily soft tissue matching with reduced anisotropic margins provides an ideal balance between prostate bed coverage and meeting organ at risk constraints. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of this approach in clinical practice. METHODS Thirty-eight radiation therapists (RTs) completed offline IGRT training involving six patients. After training was completed, this approach was implemented clinically. The first 24 patients were evaluated with a central review of match displacements and geographic miss (GM). An assessment of treatment times and planning parameters was also performed. RESULTS During offline training, the anterior-posterior (AP) match discrepancy had the largest mean variation ranging from -0.46 to 0.06 cm and undetected geographic miss occurred in 17% of alignments. The mean time taken to treat the first 24 patients ranged from 12.2 to 20.6 min. The smaller anisotropic margin resulted in similar target coverage but achieved reduced doses to the bladder (V65Gy from 36% to 27%, V40Gy from 54% to 51%) and rectum (V65Gy from 20% to 19%, V60Gy from 27% to 24%, V40Gy from 42% to 38%). The matches of 806 CBCT images in 24 patients were reviewed. The mean match ranged from -0.12 to 0.17 cm AP, -0.14 to 0.14 cm superior-inferior (SI) and -0.04 to 0.04 cm left-right (LR). An undetected geographic miss was found in the prostate bed in 17 (2.1%) images and lymph nodes in 2 (0.2%) images. CONCLUSIONS Daily soft tissue IGRT with reduced anisotropic margins for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy has been successfully implemented. RTs performed better with real-time online matching than they did in offline training, perhaps influenced by having several RTs perform online matching. Daily soft tissue IGRT did not prolong treatment time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda J. Bell
- Northern Sydney Cancer CentreRadiation Oncology DepartmentRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNSWAustralia
| | - Thomas Eade
- Northern Sydney Cancer CentreRadiation Oncology DepartmentRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNSWAustralia
- Northern Clinical SchoolUniversity of SydneySt LeonardsNSWAustralia
| | - George Hruby
- Northern Sydney Cancer CentreRadiation Oncology DepartmentRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNSWAustralia
- Northern Clinical SchoolUniversity of SydneySt LeonardsNSWAustralia
| | - Regina Bromley
- Northern Sydney Cancer CentreRadiation Oncology DepartmentRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNSWAustralia
| | - Andrew Kneebone
- Northern Sydney Cancer CentreRadiation Oncology DepartmentRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNSWAustralia
- Northern Clinical SchoolUniversity of SydneySt LeonardsNSWAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Can the Prognostic Grade Group System Inform Treatment Timing? Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 17:e930-e938. [PMID: 31257075 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In order to better time salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for post-radical prostatectomy biochemical failure, we examined the association between pre-SRT prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA control as a function of the new prognostic grade group (PGG) system. PATIENTS AND METHODS Using the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database, we identified men after radical prostatectomy with PSA > 0.2 ng/mL and without cancer involvement of lymph nodes who underwent SRT alone. SRT failure was defined as post-SRT PSA nadir + 0.2 ng/mL or receipt of post-SRT hormone therapy. Men were stratified by pre-SRT PSA (0.2-0.49, 0.5-0.99, and ≥ 1.0 ng/mL). Multivariable Cox models were used to test the association between pre-SRT PSA and SRT failure, stratified by PGG. RESULTS A total of 358 men met the inclusion criteria and comprised our study cohort. Median post-SRT follow-up was 78 months. A total of 174 men (49%) had pre-SRT PSA 0.2-0.49 ng/mL, 97 (27%) PSA 0.5-0.99 ng/mL, and 87 (24%) PSA ≥ 1.0 ng/mL. On multivariable analysis among men with PGG 1-2, pre-SRT PSA 0.2-0.49 ng/mL had similar outcomes as PSA 0.5-0.99 ng/mL; those with PSA ≥ 1.0 ng/mL had higher recurrence risks (hazard ratio = 2.78, P < .001). Among PGG 3-5, PSA 0.5-0.99 ng/mL or ≥ 1.0 ng/mL had a higher recurrence risk (hazard ratio = 2.15, P = .021; and hazard ratio = 2.49, P = .010, respectively) versus PSA 0.2-0.49 ng/mL. CONCLUSION In men with higher-grade prostate cancer (PGG 3-5), SRT should be provided earlier (PSA < 0.5 ng/mL), while among men with lower-grade disease (PGG 1-2), SRT results in equal PSA control up to PSA 1.0 ng/mL.
Collapse
|
50
|
Collier N, Kneebone A, Hruby G, McCloud P, Booth J, Eade T. A simple algorithm to predict non-compliance with organ at risk dose-volume constraints when planning intensity modulated post-prostatectomy radiation treatment: 'Why we should put the CART before the horse'. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2019; 63:546-551. [PMID: 31136089 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It is not always apparent when the optimal IMRT/VMAT plan for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy (PPRT) has been achieved. Individual variation in patient anatomy is a key contributor. This study aimed to create a model to determine the probability of rectum and/or bladder doses exceeding planning goals based on individual patient anatomy prior to planning. METHODS The IMRT/VMAT PPRT plans from 200 men were randomly and evenly allocated into the Training Cohort and the Validation Cohort. Univariate and multivariate analysis of the Training Cohort identified variables which impacted bladder and rectal doses. Significant variables were included in a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis. The resultant algorithm was then applied to the Validation Cohort. RESULTS On multivariate analysis, prescription dose; bladder and rectal volume; lymph node treatment; and percentage of bladder and rectal overlap with the PTV were significant variables. Following CART analysis, the overlap volume (OV) for both rectum (rectum overlap > 20%) and bladder (bladder overlap > 20%) were the key drivers of meeting planning goals. Treatment of pelvic lymph nodes was included as the secondary driving factor for bladder (but not rectal) dose. On application to the Validation Cohort, CART analysis predicted 95% and 87% of patients who would meet bladder and rectal planning goals respectively. CONCLUSIONS A simple algorithm was developed to predict plan quality by using the OV of the bladder and rectum with the PTV. This algorithm may be used a priori to assess the planning process in the context of variable anatomy, and to optimise planning quality and efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Collier
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Kneebone
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.,Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - George Hruby
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.,Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Philip McCloud
- McCloud Consulting Group, Gordon, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeremy Booth
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas Eade
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.,Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|