A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy

Improvement of treatment plan quality with modified fixed field volumetric modulated arc therapy in cervical cancer

PURPOSE

This study aims to introduce modified fixed field volumetric modulated arc therapy (MF-VMAT) which manually opened the field size by fixing the jaws and comparing it to the typical planning technique, auto field volumetric modulated arc therapy (AF-VMAT) in cervical cancer treatment planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Previously treated twenty-eight cervical cancer plans were retrospectively randomly selected and replanned in this study using two different planning techniques: AF-VMAT and MF-VMAT, resulting in a total of fifty-six treatment plans. In this study, we compared both planning techniques in three parts: (1) Organ at Risk (OARs) and whole-body dose, (2) Treatment plan efficiency, and (3) Treatment plan accuracy.

RESULTS

For OARs dose, bowel bag (p-value = 0.001), rectum (p-value = 0.002), and left femoral head (p-value = 0.001) and whole-body (p-value = 0.000) received a statistically significant dose reduction when using the MF-VMAT plan. Regarding plan efficiency, MF-VMAT exhibited a statistically significant increase in both number of monitor units (MUs) and control points (p-values = 0.000), while beam-on time, maximum leaf travel, average maximum leaf travel, and maximum leaf travel per gantry rotation were statistically significant decreased (p-values = 0.000). In terms of plan accuracy, the average gamma passing rate was higher in the MF-VMAT plan for both absolute dose (AD) (p-value = 0.001, 0.004) and relative dose (RD) (p-value = 0.000, 0.000) for 3%/3 and 3%/2 mm gamma criteria, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The MF-VMAT planning technique significantly reduces OAR doses and decreases the spread of low doses to normal tissues in cervical cancer patients. Additionally, this planning approach demonstrates efficient plans with lower beam-on time and reduced maximum leaf travel. Furthermore, it indicates higher plan accuracy through an increase in the average gamma passing rate compared to the AF-VMAT plan. Consequently, MF-VMAT offers an effective treatment planning technique for cervical cancer patients.

A dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus rapid arc in gynecological malignancies: Dose beyond planning target volume, precisely 5Gy volume

Introduction

Aim of radiotherapy is precise dose delivery with objective of achieving maximum local control and minimal toxicity by decreasing dose to organ at risk (OAR).This aim can be achieved by technologies like intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric arc therapy. However, later offers comparable or even better plan quality with shorter treatment time. It is important to note that low dose regions are also a concern due long-term risk of developing a second cancer after radiotherapy. The objective of our study is to do dosimetric comparison of IMRT vs. Rapid arc (RA) plan in gynecology cancer and specifically to assess dose beyond planning target volume (PTV), precisely 5 Gy volume.

Methods

Each 20 eligible patients underwent radiotherapy planning on eclipse by both IMRT and RA plans as per institution protocols. Comparative dosimetric analysis of both plans was done by paired sample t-test. PTV metrics compared were D95%, homogenecity index (HI), and conformity index (CI). OAR dose compared were bowel V40 Gy <30%, Rectum V30 Gy <60%, Bladder V45 Gy <35%, and bilateral femur head and neck V30 Gy < 50%. Futhermore, calculated monitor units (MUs) were also compared. Finally, volume of normal tissue beyond the PTV, specifically 5 Gy volume, was compared between plans.

Results

Dosimetric plan comparison showed statistically significant difference in RA and IMRT plans with improved PTV coverage and better OAR tolerance with RA plan. In addition, MU used were significantly less in RA plan, coupled with reduced V5 Gy volume.

Conclusion

In sum, RA plans are dosimetrically significantly better compared to IMRT plans in gynecological malignancies in terms of PTV coverage and OAR sparing. Importantly, not only less MU used but also significantly less normal tissue V5 Gy volume is less in RA compared to IMRT plans.

Dosimetry study of Auto-VMAT planning and Manual-VMAT planning based on Pinnacle3 9.10 in radiotherapy for cervical cancer

The purpose of this study was to compare the dose distribution characteristics of automatic volume-modulated arc therapy (Auto-VMAT) planning and manual volume-modulated arc therapy (Manual-VMAT) planning of Philips Pinnacle3 9.10 planning system, to provide a basis for optimal radiation therapy planning for cervical cancer. Ten patients with cervical cancer in our hospital from September to December 2018 were selected, and 2 treatment plans, Auto-VMAT plan and Manual-VMAT plan, were designed using Pinnacle3 9.10 planning system, respectively, to evaluate the maximum dose Dmax, mean dose Dmean, homogeneity index of the target area according to the dose volume histogram, the conformability index, plan optimization time, monitor units (MUs), organ at risk and other indicators. The results were that the Auto-VMAT plan was superior to the Manual-VMAT plan for target area Dmean, conformability index, and homogeneity index, with statistically significant differences (P < .05) and no significant difference in maximum dose Dmax (P > .05); rectal V40, V50, and Dmean in the Auto-VMAT plan, bladder V40, V50, and Dmean, small bowel V30, V40, V50 and Dmean, and right and left femoral V50 and Dmean were all lower than the Manual-VMAT plan, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05); the mean optimization time for the Auto-VMAT and Manual-VMAT plans was 47 minutes and 35 minutes, respectively, an increase of 34%. The average number of MUs was 519 MUs and 374 MUs, respectively, an increase of 28%. This study concluded that the Pinnacle3 9.10-based Auto-VMAT plan was clinically feasible and significantly superior to the Manual-VMAT plan in terms of improved target area uniformity and conformability and reduced organ endangerment dose while reducing the impact of human factors on the quality of plan design.

Prediction of dose deposition matrix using voxel features driven machine learning approach

OBJECTIVES

A dose deposition matrix (DDM) prediction method using several voxel features and a machine learning (ML) approach is proposed for plan optimization in radiation therapy.

METHODS

Head and lung cases with the inhomogeneous medium are used as training and testing data. The prediction model is a cascade forward backprop neural network where the input is the features of the voxel, including 1) voxel to body surface distance along the beamlet axis, 2) voxel to beamlet axis distance, 3) voxel density, 4) heterogeneity corrected voxel to body surface distance, 5) heterogeneity corrected voxel to beamlet axis, and (6) the dose of voxel obtained from the pencil beam (PB) algorithm. The output is the predicted voxel dose corresponding to a beamlet. The predicted DDM was used for plan optimization (ML method) and compared with the dose of MC-based plan optimization (MC method) and the dose of pencil beam-based plan optimization (PB method). The mean absolute error (MAE) value was calculated for full volume relative to the dose of the MC method to evaluate the overall dose performance of the final plan.

RESULTS

For patient with head tumor, the ML method achieves MAE value 0.49 × 10-4 and PB has MAE 1.86 × 10-4. For patient with lung tumor, the ML method has MAE 1.42 × 10-4 and PB has MAE 3.72 × 10-4. The maximum percentage difference in PTV dose coverage (D98) between ML and MC methods is no more than 1.2% for patient with head tumor, while the difference is larger than 10% using the PB method. For patient with lung tumor, the maximum percentage difference in PTV dose coverage (D98) between ML and MC methods is no more than 2.1%, while the difference is larger than 16% using the PB method.

CONCLUSIONS

In this work, a reliable DDM prediction method is established for plan optimization by applying several voxel features and the ML approach. The results show that the ML method based on voxel features can obtain plans comparable to the MC method and is better than the PB method in achieving accurate dose to the patient, which is helpful for rapid plan optimization and accurate dose calculation.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Establishment of a new machine learning method based on the relationship between the voxel and beamlet features for dose deposition matrix prediction in radiation therapy.

Comparison between Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Radiotherapy of Cervical Carcinoma: A Heterogeneous Phantom Study

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy plays a major role in the treatment of the cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE

Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in cervical cancer treatment was performed by modifying the beams arrangements to achieve better organ at risk (OAR) sparing.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The analytical evaluation study was made by modifying the IMRT plan, subtracting the rectal volume from planning target volume (PTV), and applying the field-in-field technique in 3DCRT. Eight patients in various cervical cancer stages, from I‒III, were inducted for this investigation. The prescribed dose was 5000 cGy in 25 fractions. For all cases, both IMRT and 3DCRT plans were generated. For PTV and OARs, dose volume histogram (DVH) comparative analysis was carried out. For safety checks and quality control, pre-treatment verification of all the plans was performed using an indigenously developed pelvic phantom (for IMRT and 3DCRT) and gamma analysis with Delta4 phantom (for IMRT).

RESULTS

This study indicated that IMRT can treat cervical cancer more efficiently with less damage to OARs as compare to 3DCRT.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we observe that the IMRT plans with subtracting rectal volume achieve better OAR sparing.

Dosimetric comparison of robotic- and LINAC-based treatment of spine stereotactic body radiotherapy

To determine which treatment technique and modality would offer better dosimetric results and be preferable for spinal stereotactic body therapy (SBRT) depending on the three different regions of the vertebrae. Linear accelerator (LINAC)- and CyberKnife (CK)-based treatment techniques were compared in terms of their dosimetric quality, treatment efficiency, and delivery accuracy. Thirty previously treated patients were included in this study. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques were used for LINAC-based treatment, whereas CK-based treatment plans were generated for two different collimator systems: fixed and multileaf collimator (MLC). The plans were compared based on spinal cord sparing, dose homogeneity, conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), monitor unit (MU), and beam-on time. The percentage volumes of V2Gy, V5Gy (representing volume low of the dose spillage region), V10Gy, and V20Gy (representing the volume of the high-dose spillage region) of the healthy tissue were analyzed. The CI and GI of the VMAT plans were better than those of the IMRT plans. For spinal cord sparing, the VMAT and MLC-based CK (CK-MLC) techniques were superior. The percentage of low-dose spillage regions was the lowest for IMRT and fixed cone-based CK (CK-FIX) plans. The percentage of the high-dose spillage region was the lowest for the VMAT and CK-MLC plans. In terms of treatment efficiency, the VMAT and CK-MLC plans were superior to the IMRT and CK-FIX plans. The VMAT technique lowered the MU and beam-on time values. The plan delivery accuracy of the VMAT and CK-FIX plans was better than that of the IMRT plans. VMAT is the best option for LINAC-based spinal SBRT. For CK-based spinal SBRT, MLC-based plans are preferred. If the clinic has both treatment modalities and the patient can tolerate long treatment times, CK-MLC-based treatment should be chosen because of its superiority in sparing the spinal cord and sharp dose fall-off.

Evaluating the influence of 6MV and 10MV photon beams on cervical volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is a common gynecological cancer among women worldwide.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of 6 MV and 10 MV volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) photon beams on the target volume (TV) planning and critical organs in cases of cervical cancer.

METHODS

Fifty patients with carcinoma of the cervix who underwent radiotherapy were selected. The transverse diameter (T) of the cross section of the upper edge of the sacroiliac joint on computerized tomography images of the patients was measured, and the mean value was calculated as 34 cm. All patients were divided into two groups: Group A (T < 34 cm) and Group B (T > 34 cm). The VMAT plans were generated using 6 MV and 10 MV plans separately. The prescription dose was 47.5 Gy, and the daily dose was 1.9 Gy.

RESULTS

In Group A, the planned TV (PTV) dose assessment parameters of 6 MV and 10 MV plans and their homogeneity and conformity indices were not statistically significantly different. A significant difference was observed between the 6 MV and 10 MV plans for the PTV dose assessment parameters and the homogeneity index of the plans for Group B. The monitor units of the 10 MV plans were lower than in the 6 MV plans in both Groups A and B, and the difference was statistically significant. The assessment parameter V40 Gy of both the rectum and bladder in the 6 MV plans was smaller than the corresponding parameter in the 10 MV plans in Group A; in Group B, the assessment parameter V50 Gy of the rectum in the 10 MV plans was smaller than in the 6 MV plans.

CONCLUSION

When T < 34 cm, 6 MV energy is more suitable for the external irradiation of cervical cancer. When T > 34 cm, 10 MV energy is more suitable for cervical cancer radiotherapy. Therefore, 10 MV should be considered for patients with a large abdominal size.

Impact of split X-jaw technique on target volume coverage and organ at risk sparing in prostate cancer: a comparative dosimetric study

Introduction:

The Varian Trilogy linear accelerator’s multi-leaf collimator moves on a carriage with a maximum leaf span of 15 cm. The traditional open and limited X-jaw technique of volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) yields a relatively compromised dose distribution within the planning target volume (PTV) region. This study aimed to determine whether the split X-jaw planning technique for VMAT improves plan quality regarding target dose coverage and organs at risk (OAR) sparing for PTVs that require a field size of more than 15 cm in the X-jaw direction in prostate cancer patients.

Method:

Computed tomography data sets from 15 patients with prostate cancer were enrolled in the study. Only the PTVs requiring a field size larger than 18 cm in the X-jaw position were considered, and a dose of 4500 cGy in 25 fractions was prescribed. For each case, three separate treatment plans were generated: open, limited and split X-jaw planning techniques with similar planning objectives

Results:

The split X-jaw technique resulted in statistically significant superior coverage of PTV when compared with the open (P < 0·0001) and limited methods (P < 0·001). The split technique delivered a lower dose to the OARs, although statistical significance could not be achieved. D2% (cGy) was lowest for the PTV in the split technique (4684·8 ± 18·16) and highest for the open technique (4710 ± 18·75), P < 0·001.

Conclusion:

The x-split jaw technique can replace the traditional open X-jaw practice of VMAT for PTVs requiring an X-jaw width of more than 15 cm in the Varian linear accelerator.

Dosimetric feasibility of hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiotherapy with an MRI-guided linear accelerator

Purpose/Objective(s)

Whole brain radiotherapy with hippocampal avoidance (HA‐WBRT) is a technique utilized to treat metastatic brain disease while preserving memory and neurocognitive function. We hypothesized that the treatment planning and delivery of HA‐WBRT plans is feasible with an MRI‐guided linear accelerator (linac) and compared plan results with clinical non‐MRI‐guided C‐Arm linac plans.

Materials/Methods

Twelve HA‐WBRT patients treated on a non‐MRI‐guided C‐Arm linac were selected for retrospective analysis. Treatment plans were developed using a 0.35T MRI‐guided linac system for comparison to clinical plans. Treatment planning goals were defined as provided in the Phase II Trial NRG CC001. MRI‐guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) treatment plans were developed by a dosimetrist and compared with clinical plans. quality assurance (QA) plans were generated and delivered on the MRI‐guided linac to a cylindrical diode detector array. Planning target volume (PTV) coverage was normalized to ∼95% to provide a control point for comparison of dose to the organs at risk.

Results

MRgRT plans were deliverable and met all clinical goals. Mean values demonstrated that the clinical plans were less heterogeneous than MRgRT plans with mean PTV V37.5 Gy of 0.00% and 0.03% (p = 0.013), respectively. Average hippocampi maximum doses were 14.19 ± 1.29 Gy and 15.00 ± 1.51 Gy, respectively. The gamma analysis comparing planned and measured doses resulted in a mean of 99.9% ± 0.12% of passing points (3%/2mm criteria). MRgRT plans had an average of 38.33 beams with average total delivery time and beam‐on time of 13.7 (11.2–17.5) min and 4.1 (3.2–5.4) min, respectively. Clinical plan delivery times ranged from 3 to 7 min depending on the number of noncoplanar arcs. Planning time between the clinical and MRgRT plans was comparable.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that HA‐WBRT can be treated using an MRI‐guided linear accelerator with comparable treatment plan quality and delivery accuracy.

Planning evaluation of a novel volume-based algorithm for personalized optimization of lung dose in VMAT for esophageal cancer

Radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) is time-consuming and labor-intensive since medical physicists must devise treatment plans carefully to reduce damage to tissues and organs for patients. Previously, we proposed the volume-based algorithm (VBA) method, providing optimal partial arcs (OPA) angle to achieve the low-dose volume of lungs in dynamic arc radiotherapy. This study aimed to implement the VBA for esophageal cancer (EC) patients and compare the lung dose and delivery time between full arcs (FA) without using VBA and OPA angle using VBA in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. We retrospectively included 30 patients diagnosed with EC. RTP of each patient was replanned to 4 VMAT plans, including FA plans without (FA-C) and with (FA + C) dose constraints of OARs and OPA plans without (OPA-C) and with (OPA + C) dose constraints of OARs. The prescribed dose was 45 Gy. The OARs included the lungs, heart, and spinal cord. The dose distribution, dose-volume histogram, monitor units (MUs), delivery time, and gamma passing rates were analyzed. The results showed that the lung V₅ and V₁₀ in OPA + C plans were significantly lower than in FA + C plans (p < 0.05). No significant differences were noted in planning target volume (PTV) coverage, lung V₁₅, lung V₂₀, mean lung dose, heart V₃₀, heart V₄₀, mean heart dose, and maximal spinal cord dose between FA + C and OPA + C plans. The delivery time was significantly longer in FA + C plans than in OPA + C plans (237 vs. 192 s, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between FA + C and OPA + C plans in gamma passing rates. We successfully applied the OPA angle based on the VBA to clinical EC patients and simplified the arc angle selection in RTP. The VBA could provide a personalized OPA angle for each patient and effectively reduce lung V₅, V_10, and delivery time in VMAT.

An empirical method for splitting arcs in VMAT

PURPOSE

We present a new approach to determine the optimal arc split for VMAT beams which is an extension of our recently published algorithm for selecting optimal beam angles in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) MATERIAL AND METHODS: The proposed approach uses an objective function based scoring method called "ψ - score" to determine optimal arc splitting strategy. To validate our approach, we applied it in different clinical cases: Abdomen-Para aortic node, Lung, Pancreas and Prostate. Basically, for all clinical cases, two set of plans were created, namely VMAT plan and VMAT_S plan using Pinnacle³ (V16.2, Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.). In the VMAT plans, full arc (360°) with 4-degree gantry spacing was used during optimization to compute the "ψ - score". Subsequently the avoidable arc portions were identified and removed using the ψ - score plot followed by the final optimization (VMAT_S).

RESULTS

Equivalent or better OAR sparing, and similar target coverage were achieved in VMAT_S plans compared to VMAT plans. VMAT_S reduced the number of control points and monitor units by 24.2% and 12.9% respectively. On the average, beam on time was reduced by 21.9% and low dose volume (5 Gy isodose volume) to healthy tissues was reduced by 4.9% in VMAT_S compared to VMAT plans.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrated that the proposed method is useful for reducing the monitor units, beam on time and low dose volume without significantly compromising plan quality and most useful for non-centrically located targets.

To analyse target volume variations during SIB-IMRT of squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix

Purpose:

To assess volume variations in target site due to changes in bladder filling and rectal content including air bubbles during simultaneous-integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) of patients suffering from squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix.

Materials and methods:

A total of ten patients of squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix were enrolled in this analysis. All patients were planned to undergo SIB-IMRT using 10 MV beam. Planning target volume of the tumour (PTVtumour) and PTVnodal were prescribed with 5,040 and 4,500 cGy doses, respectively. During planning, PTVtumour V95%, PTVnodal V95% and organs at risk (OARs) (bladder, rectum, femoral heads and small bowel) volumes were measured from initial CT planning scans taken with full bladder. CT scans were acquired once in a week over a treatment period of 5·5 weeks. Intra-treatment scans with full bladder were then fused with the planning scans to determine variations in the target volume and the OAR volume. Changes in radiation dose to the PTVtumour and the PTVnodal were also assessed by comparing intra-treatment scans with the planning (first) scans.

Results:

All patients showed intra-treatment bladder volume larger than the planning bladder volume. Difference between planning bladder and intra-treatment bladder volumes ranged from 4·5 to 49%. Rectal volume varied from 17 to 60 cc. A wide variation between planning and intra-treatment air volumes was found in most of the patients. When comparing initial and inter-fraction air volumes, the maximum difference was 366·67%. Due to bladder and rectal volume variations, PTVtumour V95% and PTVnodal V95% doses did not remain constant throughout the treatment. The maximum discrepancy between intra-treatment PTVtumour dose and planning PTVtumour dose was 12·15%. The maximum difference between planning and inter-fraction PTV V95% was 48·28%. PTVnodal dose observed from scan taken in last week of treatment was 12·87% less than planning PTVnodal dose analysed from planning CT scan. Maximum difference in planning and inter-fraction PTVnodal V95% was 57·78%.

Conclusion:

Inconsistent bladder and rectal volumes had a significant impact on target volume and dosage during an entire course of SIB-IMRT. For radiotherapy of gynaecological malignancies, data on variations in PTV should be acquired on daily basis to target radiation dose to the tumour site with accuracy.

Conventional 3D conformal radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for cervical cancer: Comparison of clinical results with special consideration of the influence of patient- and treatment-related parameters

PURPOSE

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for cervical cancer yields favorable results in terms of oncological outcomes, acute toxicity, and late toxicity. Limited data are available on clinical results with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). This study's purpose is to compare outcome and toxicity with VMAT to conventional 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), giving special consideration to the influence of patient- and treatment-related parameters on side effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with cervical cancer stage I-IVA underwent radiotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy using 3DCRT (n = 75) or VMAT (n = 30). Survival endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival, and locoregional control. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and the Late Effects of Normal Tissues criteria were used for toxicity assessment. Toxicity and patient- and treatment-related parameters were included in a multivariable model.

RESULTS

There were no differences in survival rates between treatment groups. VMAT significantly reduced late small bowel toxicity (OR = 0.10, p = 0.03). Additionally, VMAT was associated with an increased risk of acute urinary toxicity (OR = 2.94, p = 0.01). A low body mass index (BMI; OR = 2.46, p = 0.03) and overall acute toxicity ≥grade 2 (OR = 4.17, p < 0.01) were associated with increased overall late toxicity.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated significant reduction of late small bowel toxicity with VMAT treatment, an improvement in long-term morbidity is conceivable. VMAT-treated patients experienced acute urinary toxicity more frequently. Further analysis of patient- and treatment-related parameters indicates that the close monitoring of patients with low BMI and of patients who experienced relevant acute toxicity during follow-up care could improve late toxicity profiles.

Risk for second bladder and rectal malignancies from cervical cancer irradiation

The objective of this study was to estimate the risk of developing second malignancies to partially in‐field organs from volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of cervical cancer and to compare the above risks with those from the conventional three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D‐CRT). Seventeen consecutive patients with uterine cervix carcinoma were selected. VMAT and 3D‐CRT plans were generated with 6 and 10 MV photons, respectively. The prescribed tumor dose was 45 Gy given in 25 fractions. Differential dose‐volume histogram data from the treatment plans were obtained for the partially in‐field organs such as bladder and rectum. These data were used to estimate the patient‐specific lifetime attributable risk (LAR) for bladder and rectal cancer induction with a non‐linear model based on a mixture of plateau and bell‐shaped dose–response relationships. The estimated risks per 10000 people were compared with the baseline risks for unexposed population. The patient‐specific rectal cancer risk estimates from VMAT were significantly lower than those from 3D‐CRT (P = 0.0144). The LARs for developing bladder malignancies from VMAT were significantly high compared to those from conventional irradiation (P = 0.0003). The mean difference between the patient‐specific LARs for radiation‐induced bladder and rectal malignancies as derived from 3D‐CRT and VMAT plans was 6.6% and 2.0%, respectively. The average LAR for developing bladder and rectal malignant diseases due to VMAT was 9.2 × 10^‐4 and 43.7 × 10^‐4, respectively. The corresponding risks following 3D‐CRT were 8.6 × 10^‐4 and 44.6 × 10^‐4. These average risks showed that pelvic irradiation increases the baseline probability for cancer induction by 12.6‐19.1%. The differences in the second cancer risks associated with the VMAT and 3D‐CRT for cervical cancer were found to be small. Both treatment techniques resulted in considerable increased probabilities for developing bladder and rectal malignancies relative to those of unirradiated population.

VMAT-like plans for magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy: Addressing unmet needs

PURPOSE

VMAT delivery technique is currently not applicable to Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) hybrid systems. Aim of this study is to evaluate an innovative VMAT-like (VML) delivery technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

First, planning and dosimetric evaluation of the MRgRT VML treatment have been performed on 10 different disease sites and the results have been compared with the corresponding IMRT plans. Then, in the second phase, 10 of the most dosimetrically challenging locally advanced pancreas treatment plans have been retrospectively re-planned using the VML approach to explore the potentiality of this new delivery technique. Finally, VML robustness was evaluated and compared with the IMRT plans, considering a lateral positioning error of ± 5 mm.

RESULTS

In phase one, all VML plans were within constraint for all OARs. When PTV coverage is considered, in the 50% of the cases VML PTV coverage is equal or higher than in IMRT plan. In the remaining 50%, the highest target under coverage difference in comparison with IMRT plan is -1.71%. The mean and maximum treatment time differences (VML-IMRT) is 0.2 min and 3.1 min respectively. In phase two, the treatment time variation (VML-IMRT), shows a mean, maximum and minimum variations of 1.3, 4.6 and -0.6 min respectively. All VML plans have a better target coverage if compared with IMRT plans, keeping in any case the OARs constraints within tolerance. VML doesn't increase plan robustness.

CONCLUSION

VMAT-like treatment approach appeared to be an efficient planning solution and it was decided to clinically implement it in daily practice, especially in the frame of hypo fractionated treatments.

Dosimetric comparison of constant dose rate volumetric modulated arc therapy (CDR-VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for gallbladder cancer

Aim:

To study the feasibility of constant dose rate volumetric modulated arc therapy (CDR-VMAT) in radiotherapy for gallbladder cancer by comparing dosimetric parameter suggested by International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements-83 (ICRU-83) with step and shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SS IMRT).

Methods:

For this study, we selected 21 post-operative gallbladder cancer patients, which were treated with the IMRT technique from 2016 to 2019. For each patient, we generated SS IMRT plan and CDR-VMAT plan and were dosimetrically compared by parameters suggested by ICRU-83 for PTV. Homogeneity Index (HI) and Conformity Index (CI) were also calculated. For evaluation of Organ at Risk (OAR), we compared the mean doses, volume doses to the right kidney, left kidney, both kidneys combined, liver and max dose to the spinal cord. Monitor units (MUs) and treatment delivery time were also compared.

Results:

On comparing, we found that CDR-VMAT plans were highly conformed as CI and PCI (CI define by Paddick) were found more (0·98 ± 0·01 vs. 0·97 ± 0·03 and 0·86 ± 0·05 vs. 0·85 ± 0·05) than IMRT plans but not statistically significant. Better dose HI was found for IMRT plans with statistical significant difference (p < 0·001). The tumour coverage was found similar 98·24% and 97·83% for SS IMRT and CDR-VMAT, respectively. For D2%, the maximum dose to PTV was significantly lower in IMRT (p = 0·001). D50% and mean dose to PTV were also comparable to IMRT with no statistically significant difference. The OAR parameters were comparable in both the techniques. The mean doses and volume doses V10, V20 and V30 to the right kidney, left kidney and liver were also comparable with no significant difference (p > 0·05) was noted among them. However, the maximum dose to the spinal cord was significantly less in CDR-VMAT (21·1 Gy vs. 25·1Gy) than SS IMRT with p = 0·006. More MUs were associated with the CDR-VMAT technique, but shorter treatment delivery time than the IMRT technique.

Conclusions:

On dosimetric comparison of two treatment techniques, we conclude that CDR-VMAT can be a valid option in radiotherapy as it achieved highly conformed dose distribution, comparable tumour coverage and OAR sparing as IMRT technique for gallbladder cancer.

Dose Super-Resolution in Prostate Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Using Cascaded Deep Learning Networks

Purpose

This study proposes a cascaded network model for generating high-resolution doses (i.e., a 1 mm grid) from low-resolution doses (i.e., ≥3 mm grids) with reduced computation time.

Methods

Using the anisotropic analytical algorithm with three grid sizes (1, 3, and 5 mm) and the Acuros XB algorithm with two grid sizes (1 and 3 mm), dose distributions were calculated for volumetric modulated arc therapy plans for 73 prostate cancer patients. Our cascaded network model consisted of a hierarchically densely connected U-net (HD U-net) and a residual dense network (RDN), which were trained separately following a two-dimensional slice-by-slice procedure. The first network (HD U-net) predicted the downsampled high-resolution dose (generated through bicubic downsampling of the baseline high-resolution dose) using the low-resolution dose; subsequently, the second network (RDN) predicted the high-resolution dose from the output of the first network. Further, the predicted high-resolution dose was converted to its absolute value. We quantified the network performance using the spatial/dosimetric parameters (dice similarity coefficient, mean dose, maximum dose, minimum dose, homogeneity index, conformity index, and V_95%, V_70%, V_50%, and V_30%) for the low-resolution and predicted high-resolution doses relative to the baseline high-resolution dose. Gamma analysis (between the baseline dose and the low-resolution dose/predicted high-resolution dose) was performed with a 2%/2 mm criterion and 10% threshold.

Results

The average computation time to predict a high-resolution axial dose plane was <0.02 s. The dice similarity coefficient values for the predicted doses were closer to 1 when compared to those for the low-resolution doses. Most of the dosimetric parameters for the predicted doses agreed more closely with those for the baseline than for the low-resolution doses. In most of the parameters, no significant differences (p-value of >0.05) between the baseline and predicted doses were observed. The gamma passing rates for the predicted high-resolution does were higher than those for the low-resolution doses.

Conclusion

The proposed model accurately predicted high-resolution doses for the same dose calculation algorithm. Our model uses only dose data as the input without additional data, which provides advantages of convenience to user over other dose super-resolution methods.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a dosimetric comparison with dynamic IMRT and step-and-shoot IMRT

Aim:

The aim of this study was to compare volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (dIMRT) and step-and-shoot IMRT (ssIMRT) for different treatment sites.

Materials and methods:

Twelve patients were selected for the planning comparison study. This included three head and neck, three brain, three rectal and three cervical cancer patients. Total dose of 50 Gy was given for all the plans. Plans were done for Elekta synergy with Monaco treatment planning system. All plans were generated with 6 MV photons beam. Plan evaluation was based on the ability to meet the dose volume histogram, dose homogeneity index, conformity index and radiation delivery time, and monitor unit needs to deliver the prescribed dose.

Results:

The VMAT and dIMRT plans achieved the better conformity (CI98% = 0·965 ± 0·023) and (CI98% = 0·939 ± 0·01), respectively, while ssIMRT plans were slightly inferior (CI98% = 0·901 ± 0·038). The inhomogeneity in the planning target volume (PTV) was highest with ssIMRT with HI equal to 0·097 ± 0·015 when compared to VMAT with HI equal to 0·092 ± 0·0369 and 0·095 ± 0·023 with dIMRT. The integral dose is found to be inferior with VMAT 105·31 ± 53·6 (Gy L) when compared with dIMRT 110·75 ± 52·9 (Gy L) and ssIMRT 115 38 ± 55·1(Gy L). All the techniques respected the planning objective for all organs at risk. The delivery time per fraction for VMAT was much lower than dIMRT and ssIMRT.

Findings:

Our results indicate that dIMRT and VMAT provide better sparing of normal tissue, homogeneity and conformity than ssIMRT with reduced treatment delivery time.

Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and RapidArc in low grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary gland: a single institutional experience

Purpose:

To report a single-institution experience of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and RapidArc treatment plans for the patients treated with low grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the salivary gland while sparing the organs at risk (OARs) within tolerance limits.

Material and Methods:

Twenty-five patients with MEC were selected to develop and analyse the treatment plans using both of the techniques. Dose distributions were calculated using Eclipse treatment planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Plans were generated to deliver the dose of 6000 cGy in 30 fractions. For IMRT, seven angle plans were used and for RapidArc, two half arcs were used with the same 6 MV photon beam. Quality of treatment plans was evaluated by using parameters such as, coverage, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), unified dosimetry index (UDI), dose volume histogram, delivery time and OARs sparing for IMRT and RapidArc plans.

Results:

The analysis revealed that IMRT and RapidArc coverages are 0·90 and 0·94, respectively; CIs are 1·15 and 1·10, respectively; HIs are 1·12 and 1·07, respectively; GIs are 0·94 and 0·98, respectively. Average UDI values for RapidArc and IMRT are 1·09 and 1·11, respectively. Integral dose comparison shows better OAR sparing for RapidArc. RapidArc plans have the shorter beam on time (45%) in comparison with IMRT plans.

Conclusion:

Planning constraints were achieved in both techniques. However, RapidArc showed better quality treatment plan, OARs sparing and shorter delivery time as compared to IMRT.

Dosimetric comparison of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in locally advanced cancer cervix

Introduction:

Dosimetric advantages of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) over three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) are not established in a head-on comparison of a uniform group of locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix (LACC). Therefore, we conducted a dosimetric comparison of these two techniques in LACC patients.

Materials and methods:

Computed tomography (CT) data of histologically proven de novo LACC, including Stage IIB–IIIB and earlier stages deemed inoperable, were included in this prospective observational dosimetric study. Planning was initially done by 3D-CRT technique (dose of 45–50·4 Gy @ 1·8–2 Gy/# was used in the actual treatment), followed by VMAT planning and appropriate dosimetric comparisons were done in 39 cases.

Results:

For planning target volume coverage, D95, D98 and D100 (p < 0·0001 for all parameters) and V95 and V100 (p = 0·002 and <0·0001, respectively) were significantly improved with VMAT. The conformity index (CI) was significantly better with VMAT (p = 0·03), while 3D-CRT had a significantly better homogeneity index (HI)(p = 0·003). Dose to the urinary bladder was significantly reduced with VMAT compared to 3D-CRT for V20–V50, except V10. The doses to the rectum and abdominal cavity were significantly reduced with VMAT compared to 3D-CRT plans for all parameters (V10–V50). The number of organs at risks (OARs) for which constraints were met was higher with VMAT plans than with 3D-CRT plans, with at least four out of the five OARs protected in 46·1 versus 5·1% and all constraints achieved in 15·4% versus none.

Conclusion:

We conclude that in dosimetric terms, VMAT is superior to 3D-CRT for LACC.

Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy for adjuvant treatment of bilateral breast cancer

Purpose:

Dosimetric comparison between volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and helical tomotherapy (HT) in the treatment of bilateral breast cancer (BBC).

Materials and methods:

Ten patients treated on HT were selected retrospectively. Dose prescription was 50 Gy in 25 fractions to breast/chest wall and supraclavicular fossa (SCF) while tumour bed was simultaneously boosted to 61 Gy in 25 fractions. VMAT plans were made with four mono-isocentric partial arcs. The monitoring unit (MU) and treatment time were used to quantify the treatment efficiency. Target volumes were compared for homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI) while organs at risk (OARs) were compared for relevant dose volumes and integral doses (IDs).

Result:

For targets, no significant difference is observed between VMAT and HT in CI but VMAT could give better HI. The mean lung dose, V20 and V5 is 10·6 Gy versus 8·4 Gy (p-value 0·03), 12% versus 11·5% (p-value 0·5) and 78·1% versus 43·4% (p-value 0·005), respectively. The mean heart dose, V30 and V5 is 4·9 Gy versus 4·7 Gy (p-value 0·88), 0·5% versus 1·5% (p-value 0·18) and 26·2% versus 22·8% (p-value 0·4). Integral dose (ID) for the whole body and heart are comparable: 289 Gy kg versus 299 Gy kg (p-value 0·24) and 2·9 Gy kg versus 2·8 Gy kg (p-value 0·80). ID for lungs was significantly higher with VMAT: 7·9 Gy kg versus 6·3 Gy kg (p-value 0·03). There is a 53% reduction in treatment time and 78% in MU with VMAT against HT.

Conclusion:

VMAT can generate clinically acceptable plans comparable to HT for BBC. HT shows better control over low dose spillage in lungs compared to VMAT thereby increasing ID to lungs. VMAT shows better homogeneity and efficient treatment delivery than HT.

Initial Clinical Experience Treating Patients With Gynecologic Cancers on a 6MV Flattening Filter Free O-Ring Linear Accelerator

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy (RT) is commonly used in the treatment of gynecologic cancers. Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) has been shown to reduce gastrointestinal toxicity compared with 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional RT modalities. We report the initial clinical experience using IMRT for gynecologic cancers with a novel 6MV flattening filter free O-ring linear accelerator (6X-FFF ORL).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively identified consecutive women with uterine or cervical cancer who received pelvic RT on Halcyon (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), a novel 6X-FFF ORL. We report their clinicopathologic data, RT details, early disease-control outcomes, acute toxicities, dose-volume histogram data, couch corrections, and treatment times.

RESULTS

Seventeen women received RT on a 6X-FFF ORL for uterine cancer (76%) or cervical cancer (24%) between January 2017 and September 2019. RT was delivered postoperatively (82%) or to intact disease (18%), to a median dose of 50.4 Gy (range, 19.8-55.0 Gy) in 25 fractions (range, 11-28), with 12% receiving extended-field RT and 65% receiving chemotherapy. Target and organ-at-risk constraints were met in all plans. The 3-dimensional vector couch correction average was 0.90 ± 0.37 cm. The mean beam-on time was 2.9 ± 0.4 min and mean treatment time, from imaging start to beam-off, was 3.6 ± 0.4 min. Grade 2 fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea, bloating, and nausea occurred in 41%, 12%, 12%, 6%, and 6% of patients, respectively. There were no grade ≥3 toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

In the initial clinical report of pelvic RT for gynecologic cancers using a 6X-FFF ORL, the linac showed versatility in treatment; comparability to flattening-filtered IMRT for early disease-control, toxicity, and dosimetry; and treatment speed that compared favorably to IMRT on a C-arm gantry. Accordingly, a 6X-FFF ORL may increase throughput or reduce day length in departments with high gynecologic cancer volumes, without compromising clinical outcomes.

Impact of changes in body contours on radiation therapy dose distribution after uterine cervical cancer surgery

PURPOSE

Patients receiving postoperative irradiation for uterine cervical cancer might not be able to eat during radiation therapy because of the effects of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy; this may lead to changes in the patient's body shape during treatment. When performing image-guided radiotherapy, it is necessary to determine immediately whether treatment can be performed on the day or whether re-planning is required. The purpose of this study was to determine indicators for re-planning by examining the effects of changing body contours on radiation therapy dose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The original body contour was reduced by 1 cm in the front portion (structure-set 1). Based on the original dose distribution, the dose recalculation was performed with a structure set created using the body contour of structure-set 1. The difference between the original and recalculated dose distributions of structure-set 1 was evaluated through gamma analysis (GA).

RESULT

In the GA results for dose distribution obtained via recalculation with structure-set 1, a pass rate of 90% or more was obtained for a criterion of 2 mm/2% in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that dose re-planning is rarely required when the body shape is reduced by only 1 cm in the front.

Characteristics of inverse gamma histograms

This work explores the characteristics of the inverse gamma histogram and its potential use as part of the patient specific quality assurance (PSQA) program for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). ArcCheck measured dose files and TPS predicted dose files were imported and analysed using the in-house inverse gamma code developed in the Python package. Inverse gamma with fixed distance-to-agreement of 2 mm were calculated for 23 VMAT arcs. Dose difference histograms were plotted for six arbitrarily selected arcs with the 95th and 90th percentile values calculated. Dose difference histograms enabled visualisation of the dose difference distribution information. The 95th and 90th percentile values are equivalent to the dose difference criteria where the gamma pass rate is 95% and 90% respectively. These values can be used as a guide to assess plan acceptability, especially for plans that failed the initial gamma evaluation. The inverse gamma histograms are demonstrated to be a useful tool for plan evaluation in addition to the traditional gamma evaluation method. It contains dose difference or distance-to-agreement distribution information, which could be clinically useful for plan evaluation.

The air gap between bolus and skin affects dose distribution in helical and direct tomotherapy

Aim:

To modify the final dose delivered to superficial tissues and to modulate dose distribution near irradiated surface, different boluses are used. Air gaps often form under the bolus affecting dose distribution. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an air gap under the bolus radiation on dose delivery.

Materials and methods:

To evaluate the impact of the air gap, both helical tomotherapy (HT) and direct tomotherapy (DT) were performed in a simulation study.

Results:

The maximum dose to bolus in DT plans was bigger than that used in HT plans. The maximum dose delivered to the bolus depended on the air gap size. However, the maximum dose to bolus in all HT plans was within the acceptable value range. Acceptable value was set to up to 107% of the prescription dose. In the simulation performed in this study, the acceptable air gap under bolus was up to 15 mm and below 5 mm in HT and DT plans, respectively.

Conclusions:

HT technique is a good choice, but DT technique can be also used if the bolus position can be reproduced accurately. Thus, the reproducibility of the bolus position between planning and treatment is very important.

Early experience with hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy and simultaneous integrated boost for brain metastases

PURPOSE

Cranial irradiation results in cognitive decline, which is hypothesized to be partially attributable to hippocampal injury and stem cell loss. Recent advances allow for targeted reduction of radiation dose to the hippocampi while maintaining adequate dose coverage to the brain parenchyma and additional increasing dose to brain metastases, a approach called hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy with a simultaneous integrated boost (HA-WBRT + SIB.) We review our early clinical experience with HA-WBRT + SIB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated treatments and clinical outcomes for patients treated with HA-WBRT + SIB between 2014 and 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients (median age, 63.5 years, range 45.3-78.8 years) completed HA-WBRT + SIB. Median follow-up for patients alive at the time of analysis was 11.3 months. The most common histology was non-small cell lung cancer (n = 22). Most patients (n = 25) were prescribed with WBRT dose of 30 Gy with SIB to 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions. Volumetric modulated arc therapy reduced treatment time (p < 0.0001). Median freedom from intracranial progression and overall survival from completion of treatment were 11.4 months and 19.6 months, respectively. Karnofsky Performance Status was associated with improved survival (p = 0.008). The most common toxicities were alopecia, fatigue, and nausea. Five patients developed cognitive impairment, including grade 1 (n = 3), grade 2 (n = 1), and grade 3 (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

HA-WBRT + SIB demonstrated durable intracranial disease control with modest side effects and merits further investigation as a means of WBRT toxicity reduction while improving long-term locoregional control in the brain.

Investigating the use of aperture shape controller in VMAT treatment deliveries

BACKGROUND

Aperture shape controller (ASC) is a recently introduced leaf sequencer that controls the complexity of multileaf collimator apertures in the Photon Optimizer algorithm of the Eclipse treatment planning system. The aim of this study is to determine if the ASC can reduce plan complexity and improve verification results, without compromising plan quality.

METHODS

Thirteen plans grouped into cohorts of head and neck/brain, breast/chest and pelvis were reoptimised using the same optimization as the non-ASC setting for low, moderate and high ASC settings. These plans were analyzed using plan quality indices such as the conformity index and homogeneity index in addition to dose-volume histogram based analysis on PTVs and organ at risks. Complexity assessments were performed using metrics such as average leaf pair opening, modulation complexity scores, relative monitor units (MU) and treatment time. Monitor unit per gantry angle variations were also analyzed. A third-party algorithm was also used to assess 3D dose distributions produced using the new leaf sequencer tool. Deliverability for the final multileaf collimator distribution was quantified using portal dose image prediction based gamma analysis.

RESULTS

Plan conformality assessments showed comparable results and no significant plan degradation for plans reoptimised using ASC. Reduction in overall MU distributions were seen in some cases using higher ASC however, no overall trends were observed. In general, treatment deliverability, assessed using gamma analysis did not improve drastically however MU per degree distribution in 1 case improved when reoptimised using ASC. Treatment MUs generally reduced when ASC settings were used whilst in 1 case an increase in the treatment time factor > 1.8 was observed. The third-party algorithm assessment showed an underestimation of dose calculations for all cohorts used in this study when a higher ASC setting is used.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of using ASC in treatment plans was characterised in this study. Although plan complexity marginally improved when using higher ASC settings, no consensus could be reached based on metrics analyzed in this study. A reduction in MU distribution was observed with increasing ASC settings in most cases. This study recommends that ASC to be used as an additional tool only to test its suitability to reduce plan complexity.

The impact of the field width on VMAT plan quality and the assessment of half field method

Purpose

The goal of this work is to investigate the field width dependence of the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan quality and to propose a half field method to irradiate large volumes effectively with VMAT.

Materials and methods

We compared four different VMAT methods; namely three full field (3ff), four full field (4ff), three half field (3hf), four half field (4hf). To evaluate the impact of the field width on VMAT plan quality, 12 different size PTVs were created in the virtual phantom and treatment plans generated for each PTV were compared. The effectiveness of our half field method was tested using computed tomography (CT) data of 10 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Results

In the virtual phantom study, organs at risk (OAR) mean dose, the maximum point dose, and Homogeneity Index (HI) were found to be field width dependent. Conformation Number (CN) was not significantly affected. In the clinical study, 4hf plans obtained statistically significant dose reduction at brainstem (P < 0.001), right parotid (P = 0.034), oral cavity (P < 0.001), larynx (P = 0.003), cochlea (P = 0.017), lips (P = 0.024), and Body‐PTV (P = 0.04) compared to 4ff plans.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that VMAT plan quality is dependent on the field width. Half field VMAT method, with the help of reduced field width, shows a clear advantage for the irradiation of large size targets compared to traditionally used full field VMAT plans.

Treatment planning comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy employing a dual-layer stacked multi-leaf collimator and helical tomotherapy for cervix uteri

Purpose

To ascertain the dosimetric performance of a new delivery system (the Halcyon system, H) equipped with dual-layer stacked multi-leaf collimator (MLC) for risk-adapted targets in cervix uteri cancer patients compared to another ring-based system in clinical operation (Helical Tomotherapy, HT).

Methods

Twenty patients were retrospectively included in a treatment planning study (10 with positive lymph nodes and 10 without). The dose prescription (45Gy to the primary tumour volume and a simultaneously integrated boost up to 55Gy for the positive patients) and the clinical planning objectives were defined consistently as recommended by an ongoing multicentric clinical trial. Halcyon plans were optimised for the volumetric modulated arc therapy. The plan comparison was performed employing the quantitative analysis of the dose-volume histograms.

Results

The coverage of the primary and nodal target volumes was comparable for both techniques and both subsets of patients. The primary planning target volume (PTV) receiving at least 95% of the prescription isodose ranged from 97.2 ± 1.1% (node-negative) to 99.1 ± 1.2% (node-positive) for H and from 96.5 ± 1.9% (node-negative) to 98.3 ± 0.9% (node-positive) for HT. The uncertainty is expressed at one standard deviation from the cohort of patient per each group. For the nodal clinical target volumes, the dose received by 98% of the planning target volume ranged 55.5 ± 0.1 to 56.0 ± 0.8Gy for H and HT, respectively. The only significant and potentially relevant differences were observed for the bowels. In this case, V_40Gy resulted 226.3 ± 35.9 and 186.9 ± 115.9 cm³ for the node-positive and node-negative patients respectively for Halcyon. The corresponding findings for HT were: 258.9 ± 60.5 and 224.9 ± 102.2 cm³. On the contrary, V_15Gy resulted 1279.7 ± 296.5 and 1557.2 ± 359.9 cm³ for HT and H respectively for node-positive and 1010.8 ± 320.9 versus 1203.8 ± 332.8 cm³ for node-negative.

Conclusion

This retrospective treatment planning study, based on the dose constraints derived from the Embrace II study protocol, suggested the essential equivalence between Halcyon based and Helical Tomotherapy based plans for the intensity-modulated rotational treatment of cervix uteri cancer. Different levels of sparing were observed for the bowels with H better protecting in the high-dose region and HT in the mid-low dose regions. The clinical impact of these differences should be further addressed.

Comparison of nodal irradiation dose using radiotherapy for patients with thoracic esophageal cancer

The present study aimed to compare incidental nodal irradiation (INI) doses using volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), 5-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (5F-IMRT) and 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) treatment plans for patients with thoracic esophageal cancer (EC). A total of 15 patients with thoracic EC were selected for participation between October 2016 and July 2017 at the Hangzhou Cancer Hospital. Regional lymph nodal stations were contoured according to 3D CT-based images of the Japan Esophageal Society Guidelines. All patients were treated with 60 Gy using VMAT, 5F-IMRT and 3D-CRT plans. Dose-volume histograms of planning target volume (PTV), lung, heart, spinal cord and incidental nodal irradiation were compared between the three plans. 5F-IMRT was superior in PTV_V95% (the volume of the PTV receiving 95% of the prescription dose, P=0.003) and the VMAT plan was best in terms of conformal index (P=0.005). V20 and V30 were reduced by 10.7-22.6% (P=0.002) and 12.8-21% (P=0.026), respectively, in normal lung tissue using the VMAT plan. 5F-IMRT demonstrated the lowest maximum dose (Dmax) for the spinal cord (P=0.037). For the INI, 3D-CRT exhibited the highest equivalent uniform dose (EUD) values for 106pre (P=0.014) and 106tb-L (P=0.03) in upper-thoracic EC. The mean EUD of all lymph nodal regions in middle-thoracic EC were >40 Gy in VMAT and 5F-IMRT plans; the VMAT plan had higher EUD values in lower-thoracic EC compared with 5F-IMRT, 3D-CRT plans for INI. VMAT were comparable to the 5F-IMRT plan with respect to dosimetric characteristics for planning and INI doses to thoracic nodal levels NO 105-112 are considerable for thoracic EC.

Treatment planning of VMAT and step-and-shoot IMRT delivery techniques for single fraction spine SBRT: An intercomparative dosimetric analysis and phantom-based quality assurance measurements

PURPOSE

To retrospectively compare clinically treated step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiotherapy (ssIMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plans in dosimetric endpoints and pretreatment quality assurance (QA) measurements.

METHODS

Five single fraction spine SBRT (18 Gy) cases - including one cervical, two thoracic, and two lumbar spines - clinically treated with ssIMRT were replanned with VMAT, and all plans were delivered to a phantom for comparing plan quality and delivery accuracy. Furthermore, we analyzed 98 clinically treated plans (18 Gy single fraction), including 34 ssIMRT and 29 VMAT for cervical/thoracic spine, and 19 ssIMRT and 16 VMAT for lumbar spine. The conformality index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) were calculated, and QA measurement records were compared. For the spinal cord/cauda equina, the maximum dose to 0.03 cc (D_0.03cc ) and volume receiving 10 or 12 Gy (V_10Gy /V_12Gy ) were recorded. Statistical significance was tested with the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Compared to ssIMRT, replanned VMAT plans had lower V_10Gy /V_12Gy and D_0.03cc to the spinal cord/cauda equina in all five cases, and better CI in three out of five cases. The VMAT replans were slightly less homogeneous than those of ssIMRT plans. Both modalities passed IMRT QA with >95% passing rate with (3%, 3 mm) gamma criteria. With the 98 clinical cases, for cervical/thoracic ssIMRT and VMAT plans, the median V_10Gy of spinal cord was 4.15% and 1.85% (P = 0.004); the median D_0.03cc of spinal cord was 10.85 Gy and 10.10 Gy (P = 0.032); the median CI was 1.28 and 1.08 (P = 0.009); the median HI were 1.34 and 1.33 (P = 0.697), respectively. For lumbar spine, no significant dosimetric endpoint differences were observed. The two modalities were comparable in delivery accuracy.

CONCLUSION

From our clinically treated plans, we found that VMAT plans provided better dosimetric quality and comparable delivery accuracy when compared to ssIMRT for single fraction spine SBRT.

Treatment planning optimization with beam motion modeling for dynamic arc delivery of SBRT using Cyberknife with multileaf collimation

PURPOSE

The use of dynamic arcs for delivery of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on Cyberknife is investigated, with a view to improving treatment times. This study investigates the required modeling of robot and multileaf collimator (MLC) motion between control points in the trajectory and then uses this to develop an optimization method for treatment planning of a dynamic arc with Cyberknife. The resulting plans are compared in terms of dose-volume histograms and estimated treatment times with those produced by a conventional beam arrangement.

METHODS

Five SBRT patient cases (prostate A - conventional, prostate B - brachytherapy-type, lung, liver, and partial left breast) were retrospectively studied. A suitable arc trajectory with control points spaced at 5° was proposed and treatment plans were produced for typical clinical protocols. The optimization consisted of a fluence optimization, segmentation, and direct aperture optimization using a gradient descent method. Dose delivered by the moving MLC was either taken to be the dose delivered discretely at the control points or modeled using effective fluence delivered between control points. The accuracy of calculated dose was assessed by recalculating after optimization using five interpolated beams and 100 interpolated apertures between each optimization control point. The resulting plans were compared using dose-volume histograms and estimated treatment times with those for a conventional Cyberknife beam arrangement.

RESULTS

If optimization is performed based on discrete doses delivered at the arc control points, large differences of up to 40% of the prescribed dose are seen when recalculating with interpolation. When the effective fluence between control points is taken into account during optimization, dosimetric differences are <2% for most structures when the plans are recalculated using intermediate nodes, but there are differences of up to 15% peripherally. Treatment plan quality is comparable between the arc trajectory and conventional body path. All plans meet the relevant clinical goals, with the exception of specific structures which overlap with the planning target volume. Median estimated treatment time is 355 s (range 235-672 s) for arc delivery and 675 s (range 554-1025 s) for conventional delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

The method of using effective fluence to model MLC motion between control points is sufficiently accurate to provide for accurate inverse planning of dynamic arcs with Cyberknife. The proposed arcing method produces treatment plans with comparable quality to the body path, with reduced estimated treatment delivery time.

RapidPlan development of VMAT plans for cervical cancer patients in low- and middle-income countries

Cervical cancer has a high incidence and mortality rate in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) largely due to limited resources and insufficient staffing. Knowledge-based planning (KBP) could alleviate understaffing issues by streamlining the radiotherapy treatment planning process. Varian's KBP system (RapidPlan) was used to develop a model capable of producing volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for cervical cancer patients. Plan data from 46 patients previously treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) were used to create and train the model which was then applied to 32 patients excluded from the training process. Dose volume histogram (DVH) values for the planning target volume (PTV_High), bladder, rectum, and bowel were evaluated for the validation plans and found to have satisfied the required PTV coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) dose constraints. The average value for PTV_High D_95.0% was 48.0 Gy (sd = 3.0 Gy) for existing clinical plans and 48.4 Gy (sd = 2.6 Gy) for the validation plans. The mean dose for the bladder, rectum, and bowel was 39.8 Gy (sd = 3.9 Gy), 41.6 Gy (sd = 5.2 Gy), and 21.6 Gy (sd = 5.0 Gy) for existing clinical plans and 38.9 Gy (sd = 4.0 Gy), 40.3 Gy (sd = 4.8 Gy), and 21.5 Gy (sd = 4.6 Gy) for validation plans, respectively. A TOST test showed that the p values for the PTV_High D_95.0% (p < 0.001), rectum V_30Gy (p = 0.039), and mean dose to the bladder (p = 0.0014), rectum (p = 0.025), and bowel (p = 0.006) were statistically significant within a 5% equivalence margin of the clinical value thereby providing strong evidence of equivalence. Based on this statistical analysis, it was determined that the model was capable of generating treatable VMAT plans for cervical cancer patients.

A comparative dosimetric study of cervical cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy vs. 9-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy

Background

To compare the dosimetric characteristics between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 9-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (9F-IMRT) for cervical cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis.

Methods

We selected 20 patients who had received extended-field radiotherapy for cervical cancer with PALN metastasis. IMRT and VMAT plans were compared in terms of target, organs at risk (OARs), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), the number of monitor units (MUs) and treatment time (s).

Results

The CI and HI of VMAT plans were superior to those of IMRT plans (P<0.05). As for OARs, the mean maximum doses (Dmean) to the kidneys in the VMAT plans were all lower than those in IMRT plans (P<0.001). V40, V50 of the rectum, and V40 of the bladder in VMAT plans involved fewer doses than IMRT plans (P<0.001). Compared with IMRT plans, VMAT reduced the average number of MUs by 51% and the average treatment time by 31%.

Conclusions

Both VMAT and IMRT plans can satisfy clinical dosimetric demands and protect OARs. VMAT has the best performance on CI and HI and can better protect the OARs. VMAT plans have fewer MUs and improve treatment efficiency.

Evaluation of Healthy Tissue Dose at Different Regions between Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Plans in the Treatment of Various Cancers

Background:

Radiotherapy plays an important role in the management of cancer. Although the improved technologies increase therapeutic index, different delivery techniques deliver different dose pattern to the healthy tissue within and outside treatment volume.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to evaluate the low, intermediate, and high dose to healthy tissue within and outside the treatment volume and to find the relation between tumor volume and various doses received healthy tissue volume.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 150 patients were included. For all patients, planning computed tomography images were acquired. Tumors, critical structures, and healthy tissue volumes at different regions were delineated. Two sets of plans, one with volumetric-modulated arc therapy and another with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were created, optimized for 6 MV photons and dose was calculated. Dosimetry results for tumor, organs at risks (OARs), and healthy tissue from both the techniques were evaluated and compared.

Results:

Tumor coverage and dose to OARs was significantly better with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Volume of healthy tissue received high-dose within the treatment volume as well as volume of healthy tissue received low and intermediate-dose out of treatment volume were significantly (P < 0.002) lesser with VMAT. Besides, the results showed that as the tumor volume increased, the various dose received healthy tissue volume also increased.

Conclusions:

VMAT plan can reduce the risk of secondary malignancy while treating different sites of cancer. VMAT is the most appropriate technique than IMRT, especially in the treatment of large tumor volume. Special attention has to be given, especially while treating women and children.

Single-Isocenter Multitarget Stereotactic Radiosurgery Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Multiple Brain Metastases

Purpose

Multiple studies have reported favorable outcomes for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of limited brain metastases. An obstacle of SRS in the management of numerous metastases is the longer treatment time using traditional radiosurgery. Single-isocenter multitarget (SIMT) SRS is a novel technique that permits rapid therapy delivery to multiple metastases. There is a lack of clinical evidence regarding its efficacy and safety. We report the outcomes of patients treated with this technique.

Methods and Materials

We reviewed the records of patients with intact or resected brain metastases treated with SRS in 1 to 5 fractions using SIMT technique at our institution, with at least 1 available follow-up brain magnetic resonance imaging. Survival, disease control, and toxicity were evaluated using Cox regression, logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

We identified 173 patients with 1014 brain metastases. Median follow up was 12.7 months. Median beam-on time was 4.1 minutes. The median dose to the brain was 219.4 cGy. Median overall survival and freedom from intracranial progression were 13.2 and 6.3 months, respectively. Overall survival did not differ between patients treated with greater than or less than 4 lesions (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval 0.66-1.61; P = .91). Actuarial 1- and 2-year local control were 99.0% and 95.1%, respectively. Rates of grade 2 and grade 3 or higher radionecrosis were 1.4% and 0.9%, respectively.

Conclusions

SIMT radiosurgery delivered in 1 to 5 fractions offers excellent local control and acceptable toxicity in the treatment of multiple intact and postoperative brain metastases. This technique should be evaluated prospectively.

Effective heart-sparing whole lung irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy: a case report

Background

Late cardiovascular disease-related adverse events are one of the most common causes of premature mortality among long-term survivors of childhood cancer. As it is difficult to reduce the heart dose with traditional anteroposterior–posteroanterior field whole lung irradiation for pulmonary metastasis, improved radiation techniques are highly desirable. We report a case treated with whole lung irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Case presentation

A 3-year-old Japanese girl with pulmonary metastases of Wilms’ tumor received 12 Gy in 8 fractions of whole lung irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy. The treatment was well tolerated, and the course was completed as planned without any toxicity. We found statistically significant reduced volumetric modulated arc therapy irradiation doses to organs at risk relative to those of the standard anteroposterior–posteroanterior field technique. The mean heart dose was 8.5 Gy for volumetric modulated arc therapy and 12.3 Gy for the anteroposterior–posteroanterior field. The doses to liver and thyroid were also more favorable with volumetric modulated arc therapy than with the anteroposterior–posteroanterior field technique. We confirmed the dosimetric advantages of volumetric modulated arc therapy over anteroposterior–posteroanterior field in whole lung irradiation in terms of superior normal organ protection.

Conclusions

Effective heart sparing is possible for whole lung irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy. Large-scale studies using standardized procedures should be conducted to validate our results.

Evaluation of mixed energy partial arcs for volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this work was to investigate the dosimetric impact of mixed energy (6-MV, 15-MV) partial arcs (MEPAs) technique on prostate cancer VMAT plans.

METHODS

This work involved prostate only patients, planned with 79.2 Gy in 44 fractions to the planning target volume (PTV). Femoral heads, bladder, and rectum were considered organs at risk. This study was performed in two parts. For each of the 25 patients in Part 1, two single-energy single-arc plans, a 6 MV-SA plan and a 15 MV-SA plan, and a third MEPA plan involving composite of 6-MV anterior-posterior partial arcs and a 15-MV lateral partial arc weighted 1:2 were created. The dosimetric difference between MEPA(6/15 MV 1:2 weighted) and 6 MV-SA plans, and MEPA(6/15 MV 1:2 weighted) and 15 MV-SA plans were measured. In the Part 2 of this study, a second MEPAs plan (6 MV anterior-posterior arcs and 15 MV lateral arcs weighted 1:1), (MEPA 6/15 MV 1:1 weighted), was generated for 15 patients and compared only with two single-energy partial arcs plans, a 6 and a 15 MV-PA, to investigate the influence of the energy only. Dosimetric parameters of each structure, total monitor-units (MUs), homogeneity index (HI), and conformity number (CN) were analyzed.

RESULTS

In Part 1, no statistically significant differences were observed for mean dose to PTV and CN for MEPAs (6/15 MV 1:2 weighted) vs 6 and 15 MV-SA. MEPAs (6/15 MV 1:2 weighted) increased HI compared to 6 and 15 MV-SA (P < 0.0005; P < 0.0005). MEPAs (6/15 MV 1:2 weighted) produced significantly lower mean doses to rectum, bladder, and MUs/fraction, but higher mean doses to femoral heads, compared to 6 MV-SA (P < 0.0005) and 15 MV-SA (P < 0.0005). The results of Part 2 of this study showed that, in comparison to 6 and 15 MV-PA, MEPAs (6/15 MV 1:1 weighted) plans significantly improved CNs (P < 0.0005; P < 0.0005) and produced significantly lower mean doses to the rectum and bladder (P < 0.0005; P < 0.0005). While mean doses to the PTV and femoral heads of MEPAs (6/15 MV 1:1 weighted) plans were statistically comparable to 6 MV-PA (P > 0.05), MEPAs (6/15 MV 1:1 weighted) increased mean doses to left (P = 0.04) and right (P = 0.04) femoral heads compared to 15 MV-PA. MEPAs (6/15 MV 1:1 weighted) resulted in significantly lower total MUs compared to 6 MV-PA (P < 0.0005) and 15 MV-PA (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The study for prostate radiotherapy demonstrated that a choice of MEPAs for VMAT has the potential to minimize doses to OARs and improve dose conformity to PTV, at the expense of a moderate increase in mean dose to the femoral heads.

The role of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in gynaecological radiation therapy: A dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiation therapy versus VMAT

INTRODUCTION

For gynaecological cancers, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) offers comparable plan quality with shorter treatment delivery times when compared to intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

METHODS

The clinical IMRT plans of twenty gynaecological cancer patients were compared with a retrospectively generated VMAT plan. Planning target volume (PTV) metrics compared were D95 > 99%, homogeneity index, and conformity index. Organs at risk (OAR) doses compared were bladder V45 < 35%, bowel V40 < 30%, femoral head and neck (FHN) V30 < 50%, V44 < 35% and V44 < 5%. Plan quality was also assessed by comparing the monitor units (MU), treatment time and the patient-specific quality assurance results.

RESULTS

VMAT and IMRT resulted in comparable PTV coverage with D95 values of 98.92% ± 0.69% and 98.91% ± 1.43% respectively, and homogeneity index values of 0.08 ± 0.02 (VMAT) and 0.08 ± 0.03 (IMRT). The conformity index for VMAT was 0.93 ± 0.04 and IMRT 0.85 ± 0.06 (P < 0.001). For the bowel tolerance (40 Gy < 30%) VMAT resulted in 22.39% ± 12.5% compared to 28.8% ± 16.78% for IMRT, with bladder and FHN VMAT doses also lower. VMAT MU were 694.35 ± 126.56 compared to 606.8 ± 96.16 for IMRT (P < 0.01). Treatment times of 6.6 ± 0.82 min and 2.47 ± 0.35 min were achieved for IMRT and VMAT respectively.

CONCLUSION

VMAT showed improvements in sparing OAR compared to IMRT. Target volume coverage with VMAT was equivalent or better than that of IMRT. These results in conjunction with the confirmed shorter treatment delivery time, have led to the development and implementation of a clinical protocol.

Development of geometrically ideal dose distribution as a reference for treatment planning in VMAT using filtered back-projection method

PURPOSE

To determine optimal dose distribution in the treatment planning of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), a virtually ideal dose distribution was developed as a reference by applying filtered back-projection method.

METHODS

Delineated structures in patient CT scans were identified using a treatment planning system. The projection of the planning target volume (PTV) was calculated along the X-ray direction for each angle of rotation. Each projection was Fourier transformed to the frequency space; a Shepp-Logan filter was applied, then an inverse Fourier transformation was performed. As the dose irradiation cannot assume a negative value, the filtered projections were shifted using the minimum value inside of the PTV. All values outside of the PTV were set to zero. The corrected filtered projections were then multiplied by the tissue-maximum ratio according to each voxel depth from the surface of the body to simulate X-ray attenuation. Finally, the distributions of multiple rotational angles were convolved to simulate the dose distribution of the VMAT.

RESULTS

Ideal dose distributions were generated with sufficient uniformity inside of the PTV. Dose spreading except for the PTV due to external irradiation was reproduced in the case of a brain tumor. A reference dose distribution including OAR sparing was produced. The efficacy of this process as a target for optimum planning was confirmed.

CONCLUSION

Using applied filtered back-projection, the ideal dose distribution, which excluded some device-oriented restrictions, was generated. This application will provide support for the determination of VMAT planning quality by providing reference dose distributions.

Individualized automated planning for dose bath reduction in robotic radiosurgery for benign tumors

Object

To explore the use of automated planning in robotic radiosurgery of benign vestibular schwannoma (VS) tumors for dose reduction outside the planning target volume (PTV) to potentially reduce risk of secondary tumor induction.

Methods

A system for automated planning (AUTOplans) for VS patients was set up. The goal of AUTO- planning was to reduce the dose bath, including the occurrence of high dose spikes leaking from the PTV into normal tissues, without worsening PTV coverage, OAR doses, or treatment time. For 20 VS patients treated with 1x12 Gy, the AUTOplan was compared with the plan generated with conventional, manual trial-and-error planning (MANplan).

Results

With equal PTV coverage, AUTOplans showed clinically negligible differences with MANplans in OAR sparing (largest mean difference for all OARs: ΔD2% = 0.2 Gy). AUTOplan dose distributions were more compact: mean/maximum reductions of 23.6/53.8% and 9.6/28.5% in patient volumes receiving more than 1 or 6 Gy, respectively (p<0.001). AUTOplans also showed smaller dose spikes with mean/maximum reductions of 22.8/37.2% and 14.2/40.4% in D2% for shells at 1 and 7 cm distance from the PTV, respectively (p<0.001).

Conclusion

Automated planning for benign VS tumors highly outperformed manual planning with respect to the dose bath outside the PTV, without deteriorating PTV coverage or OAR sparing, or significantly increasing treatment time.

A dosimetric comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy in localized cervical cancer radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer radiotherapy is usually administrated through 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) followed by a brachytherapy (BT) boost.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) can replace High Dose Rate (HDR) intracavitary BT boost for patients undergoing cervical cancer radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Computed Tomography (CT) images for ten patients with tandem and ovoids were included in this study. Target volumes, rectum, bladder, sigmoid, small bowel and both femoral heads were delineated. Two plans were carried out including (a) a BT plan optimized manually by modifying dwell time and Ir-192 source positions, (b) a VMAT plan generated using two partial arcs with 10 MV photon beam. The prescribed dose was 7 Gy. The relevant dose volume parameters (DVPs) of target volumes and OARs for the two plans were analyzed statistically using SPSS Wilcoxon Signed Rank test.

RESULTS

VMAT plan showed a significant reduction of 9.1%, 9.3%, 15.4%, 14.4% and 13.1% in rectum maximum dose, rectum D2cc, bladder maximum dose, bladder D2cc and sigmoid maximum dose (P < 0.05). VMAT and BT plans showed comparable D2cc of sigmoid and small bowel maximum doses (P = 0.333 and P = 0.646). On the other hand, VMAT showed significantly higher small bowel D2cc and maximum point dose for both femoral heads comparing to BT plan (P < 0.05). Also, VMAT plan yielded greater homogeneous target coverage compared to BT plan (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that VMAT plan achieves significant dose reduction of rectum, bladder and sigmoid, as well as superior homogeneous target coverage compared to BT plan. On the other hand, VMAT delivers more radiation exposures to small bowel and femoral heads.

A comparative study of RapidArc and intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan quality for cervical cancer treatment

Background

RapidArc therapy, a complex form of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), is now widely used to treat cancer patients.

Aims

This study aimed to investigate and compare the plan quality of IMRT and RapidArc techniques using various dosimetric indices to find the better treatment modality for treating patients with cervix cancer.

Materials and Methods

Thirteen cervical cancer patients treated with IMRT were selected for analysis and original plans were subsequently re-optimized using the RapidArc technique. Plans were generated such that dose of 5000 cGy was delivered in 25 equal fractions. Inverse planning was done by Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) treatment planning system for 15 MV photon beams from computed tomographic data. Double arcs were used for RapidArc plans. Quality of treatment plans was evaluated by calculating conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), coverage, and unified dosimetry index (UDI) for each plan.

Results and Conclusion

RapidArc resulted in better planning target volume (PTV) coverage as is evident from its superior conformation number, coverage, CI, HI, GI, and UDI. Regarding organs at risk (OARs), RapidArc plans exhibit superior organ sparing as is evident from integral dose comparison. Difference between both techniques was determined by statistical analysis. For all cases under study, modest differences between IMRT and RapidArc treatment were observed. RapidArc-based treatment planning is safer with similar planning goals compared to the standard fixed IMRT technique. This study clearly demonstrated that favorable dose distribution in PTV and OARs was achieved using RapidArc technique, and hence, the risk of damage to normal tissues is reduced.

Evaluation of optimization workflow using design of experiment (DoE) for various field configurations in volumetric-modulated arc therapy

PURPOSE

In volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), field configurations such as couch or arc angles are defined manually or using a template. A field configuration is reselected through trial-and-error in the case of undesirable resultant planning. To efficiently plan for desirable quality, configurations should be assessed before dose calculation. Design of experiments (DoE) is an optimization technique that efficiently reveals the influence of inputs on outputs. We developed an original tool using DoE to determine the field configuration selection and evaluated the efficacy of this workflow for clinical practice.

METHODS

Computed-tomography scans of 17 patients and target structures were acquired retrospectively from a brain tumor treated using a dual-arc VMAT plan. The configurations of the couch, arc, collimator angles, field sizes, and beam energy were determined using DoE. The resultant dose distributions obtained using the DoE-selected configuration were compared with the clinical plan.

RESULTS

The averaged differences between the DoE and clinical plan for 17 patients of doses to 50% of the planning target volume (PTV-D50%), Brain-D60%, Brain-D30%, Brain stem-D1%, Left eye-D1%, Right eye-D1%, Optic nerve-D1%, and Chiasm-D1% were 0.2 ± 0.5%, -1.0 ± 4.6%, 1.7 ± 3.5%, -2.5 ± 6.7%, -0.2 ± 4.9%, -1.2 ± 3.6%, -2.8 ± 7.3%, and -2.1 ± 5.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our optimization workflow obtained using DoE for various field configurations provided the same or slightly superior plan quality compared with that created by experts. This process is feasible for clinical practice and will efficiently improve treatment quality while removing the influence of the planner's experience.

Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) are two of the main treatment techniques for cervical cancer. Whether either technique significantly reduces irradiated volumes of organs at risk (OARs) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to explore which of these treatment paradigms is the superior technique in cervical treatment, taking clinical outcomes and treatment efficiency from published findings into consideration.

Materials and methods

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were utilized. The average percent irradiated volumes of OAR were extracted from all included studies. Dual arc results were extracted due to their superiority to single arc methods in terms of plan quality. Standard mean deviations and 95% CIs were calculated for delivery time, monitor units, and average percent irradiated volumes of OAR. Assessment of publication bias and sensitivity analyses were performed. All statistical analyses were conducted using R 3.5.0 software.

Results

Eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. For irradiated volumes of OARs, irradiated volume of rectum receiving 40 Gy (rectum V40) was significantly decreased in VMAT compared with IMRT. However, no significant differences were observed between IMRT and VMAT plans in bladder V40 or small bowel V40/V30. In addition, delivery times and monitor units were significantly lower in the VMAT plan than in the IMRT plan.

Conclusion

Compared with IMRT, VMAT is significantly more protective for the rectum, suggesting that it may be an optional therapy technique for patients with cervical cancer.

Monitoring of platelet function parameters and microRNA expression levels in patients with prostate cancer treated with volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy

Radiotherapy (RT) may result in platelet activation and thrombosis development. To the best of our knowledge, the potential effect of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), a novel radiotherapy technique, on platelet function and microRNA (miRNA/miR) expression has not been previously investigated. The present study aimed to determine the effect of VMAT on the alterations in platelet function parameters and miRNA expression levels. A total of 25 patients with prostate cancer and 25 healthy subjects were included in the present study. Blood samples were collected from the patient group on the day prior to RT (pre-RT), the day RT was completed (post-RT day 0), and 40 days following the end of therapy (post-RT day 40). Platelet count, mean platelet volume (MPV) value, platelet aggregation, plasma P-selectin, thrombospondin-1, platelet factor 4, plasma miR-223 and miR-126 expression levels were measured. A significant decrease in platelet count in the post-RT day 0 group was measured in comparison with the pre-RT and the post-RT day 40 groups. Pre-RT MPV values were higher than those of the post-RT day 0 and the post-RT day 40 groups. No significant differences were observed in the levels of platelet activation markers or miR-223 and miR-126 expression levels between the RT groups. Although RT may result in a reduction in platelet and MPV counts, the results of the present study indicate that platelet activation markers are not affected by VMAT. Therefore, it is possible that no platelet activation occurs during VMAT, owing to the conformal dose distributions, improved target volume coverage and the sparing of normal tissues from undesired radiation.