1
|
Verma S, Grindrod N, Breadner D, Lock M. The Current Role of Radiation in the Management of Cholangiocarcinoma-A Narrative Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1776. [PMID: 38730728 PMCID: PMC11083065 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare cancer of bile ducts. It is associated with a poor prognosis. The incidence of CCA is rising worldwide. Anatomical subgroups have been used to classify patients for treatment and prognosis. There is a growing understanding of clinically important distinctions based on underlying genetic differences that lead to different treatment options and outcomes. Its management is further complicated by a heterogeneous population and relative rarity, which limits the conduct of large trials to guide management. Surgery has been the primary method of therapy for localized disease; however, recurrence and death remain high with or without surgery. Therefore, there have been concerted efforts to investigate new treatment options, such as the use of neoadjuvant treatments to optimize surgical outcomes, targeted therapy, leveraging a new understanding of immunobiology and stereotactic radiation. In this narrative review, we address the evidence to improve suboptimal outcomes in unresectable CCA with radiation, as well as the role of radiation in neoadjuvant and postoperative treatment. We also briefly discuss the recent developments in systemic treatment with targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurav Verma
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; (S.V.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Natalie Grindrod
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; (S.V.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Daniel Breadner
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; (S.V.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Michael Lock
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; (S.V.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mizumoto M, Terashima K, Makishima H, Suzuki M, Ogino T, Waki T, Iwata H, Tamamura H, Uchinami Y, Akimoto T, Okimoto T, Iizumi T, Murakami M, Katoh N, Maruo K, Shibuya K, Sakurai H. Proton Beam Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Prospective Registry Study in Japan. Liver Cancer 2024; 13:161-168. [PMID: 38751552 PMCID: PMC11095592 DOI: 10.1159/000531376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) can be treated with chemotherapy in unresectable cases, but outcomes are poor. Proton beam therapy (PBT) may provide an alternative treatment and has good dose concentration that may improve local control. Methods Fifty-nine patients who received initial PBT for ICC from May 2016 to June 2018 at nine centers were included in the study. The treatment protocol was based on the policy of the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. Forty patients received 72.6-76 Gy (RBE) in 20-22 fr, 13 received 74.0-76.0 Gy (RBE) in 37-38 fr, and 6 received 60-70.2 Gy (RBE) in 20-30 fr. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results The 59 patients (35 men, 24 women; median age: 71 years; range: 41-91 years) had PS of 0 (n = 47), 1 (n = 10), and 2 (n = 2). Nine patients had hepatitis and all 59 cases were considered inoperable. The Child-Pugh class was A (n = 46), B (n = 7), and unknown (n = 6); the median maximum tumor diameter was 5.0 cm (range 2.0-15.2 cm); and the clinical stage was I (n = 12), II (n = 19), III (n = 10), and IV (n = 18). At the last follow-up, 17 patients were alive (median follow-up: 36.7 months; range: 24.1-49.9 months) and 42 had died. The median OS was 21.7 months (95% CI: 14.8-34.4 months). At the last follow-up, 37 cases had recurrence, including 10 with local recurrence. The median PFS was 7.5 months (95% CI: 6.1-11.3 months). In multivariable analyses, Child-Pugh class was significantly associated with OS and PFS, and Child-Pugh class and hepatitis were significantly associated with local recurrence. Four patients (6.8%) had late adverse events of grade 3 or higher. Conclusion PBT gives favorable treatment outcomes for unresectable ICC without distant metastasis and may be particularly effective in cases with large tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Kazuki Terashima
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan
| | | | - Motohisa Suzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Takashi Ogino
- Medipolis Proton Therapy and Research Center, Ibusuki, Japan
| | - Takahiro Waki
- Department of Radiology, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, Tsuyama, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | - Yusuke Uchinami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Okimoto
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan
| | - Takashi Iizumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Norio Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kazushi Maruo
- Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Kei Shibuya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu TC, Deng J, Chu FI, Sadeghi S, Finn R, Agopian VG, Lee P, Raldow AC. Single center experience using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on orthotopic liver transplant protocol for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:444-450. [PMID: 38142182 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate tolerability, pathologic response, and disease outcomes utilizing pre-operative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (CHT) prior to orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) in unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). METHODS This was a retrospective chart review of patients treated on OLT protocol at a single tertiary center from 2012 to 2019. Patients received pre-operative SBRT (40-50 Gy in 5 fractions) followed by CHT until progression or OLT. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared via log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS 26 patients (84.6% hilar, 15.4% intrahepatic) were identified for analysis. Eight patients (30.8%) patients developed acute toxicity after SBRT, mostly grade 1 nausea. Nine (34.6%) patients underwent OLT of which 4 (44.4%) achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR). Five (55.6%) OLT patients, including 2 pCR, developed recurrence at a median time of 49.9 weeks after OLT. 3-year OS for the OLT and dropout cohort was 75% and 9%, respectively (p < 0.0001). OS in hilar tumors only was statistically different for those that achieved a pCR (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS Pre-operative SBRT is a well-tolerated and effective radiation technique as part of OLT protocol for unresectable CCA and conferred in a pCR rate of 44% within our cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trudy C Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, 200 Medical Plaza Driveway, Suite B265, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
| | - Jie Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, 200 Medical Plaza Driveway, Suite B265, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Fang-I Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, 200 Medical Plaza Driveway, Suite B265, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Saeed Sadeghi
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, 200 Medical Plaza Driveway, Suite 120B, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Richard Finn
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, 200 Medical Plaza Driveway, Suite 120B, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Vatche G Agopian
- Department of Liver Transplant Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Orange County, Lennar Foundation Cancer Center, 1000 Fivepoint, Irvine, CA, 92618, USA
| | - Ann C Raldow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, 200 Medical Plaza Driveway, Suite B265, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Overeem Felter M, Møller PK, Josipovic M, Bekke SN, Bernchou U, Serup-Hansen E, Madsen K, Parikh PJ, Kim J, Geertsen P, Behrens CP, Vogelius IR, Pøhl M, Schytte T, Persson GF. MR-guided stereotactic radiotherapy of infra-diaphragmatic oligometastases: Evaluation of toxicity and dosimetric parameters. Radiother Oncol 2024; 192:110090. [PMID: 38224916 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The SOFT trial is a prospective, multicenter, phase 2 trial investigating magnetic resonance (MR)-guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for abdominal, soft tissue metastases in patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) (clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT04407897). We present the primary endpoint analysis of 1-year treatment-related toxicity (TRAE). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with up to five oligometastases from non-hematological cancers were eligible for inclusion. A risk-adapted strategy prioritized fixed organs at risk (OAR) constraints over target coverage. Fractionation schemes were 45-67.5 Gy in 3-8 fractions. The primary endpoint was grade ≥ 4 TRAE within 12 months post-SABR. The association between the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and clinical and dosimetric parameters was tested using a normal tissue complication probability model. RESULTS We included 121 patients with 147 oligometastatic targets, mainly located in the liver (41 %), lymph nodes (35 %), or adrenal glands (14 %). Nearly half of all targets (48 %, n = 71) were within 10 mm of a radiosensitive OAR. No grade 4 or 5 TRAEs, 3.5 % grade 3 TRAEs, and 43.7 % grade 2 TRAEs were reported within the first year of follow-up. We found a significant association between grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity and the parameters GI OAR D0.1cc, D1cc, and D20cc. CONCLUSION In this phase II study of MR-guided SABR of oligometastases in the infra-diaphragmatic region, we found a low incidence of toxicity despite half of the lesions being within 10 mm of a radiosensitive OAR. GI OAR D0.1cc, D1cc, and D20cc were associated with grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette van Overeem Felter
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Pia Krause Møller
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark; OPEN, Open Patient data Explorative Network at Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9a, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Mirjana Josipovic
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Susanne Nørring Bekke
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Uffe Bernchou
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19, 3. 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Eva Serup-Hansen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Kasper Madsen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Parag J Parikh
- Department of Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2800 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202, United States
| | - Joshua Kim
- Department of Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2800 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202, United States
| | - Poul Geertsen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Claus P Behrens
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Ivan R Vogelius
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mette Pøhl
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tine Schytte
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19, 3. 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Gitte Fredberg Persson
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Groß S, Bitzer M, Albert J, Blödt S, Boda-Heggemann J, Brunner T, Caspari R, De Toni E, Dombrowski F, Evert M, Follmann M, Freudenberger P, Gani C, Geier A, Gkika E, Götz M, Helmberger T, Hoffmann RT, Huppert P, Krug D, La Fougère C, Lang H, Langer T, Lenz P, Lüdde T, Mahnken A, Nadalin S, Nguyen HHP, Nothacker M, Ockenga J, Oldhafer K, Paprottka P, Pereira P, Persigehl T, Plentz R, Pohl J, Recken H, Reimer P, Riemer J, Ritterbusch U, Roeb E, Rüssel J, Schellhaas B, Schirmacher P, Schlitt HJ, Schmid I, Schuler A, Seehofer D, Sinn M, Stengel A, Steubesand N, Stoll C, Tannapfel A, Taubert A, Tholen R, Trojan J, van Thiel I, Vogel A, Vogl T, Wacker F, Waidmann O, Wedemeyer H, Wege H, Wildner D, Wörns MA, Galle P, Malek N. S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie biliärer Karzinome“ – Langversion 4.0. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:e213-e282. [PMID: 38364849 DOI: 10.1055/a-2189-8567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Groß
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Michael Bitzer
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Jörg Albert
- Katharinenhospital, Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Pneumologie, Stuttgart
| | - Susanne Blödt
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V. (AWMF), Berlin
| | | | - Thomas Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz
| | - Reiner Caspari
- Klinik Niederrhein, Erkrankungen des Stoffwechsels der Verdauungsorgane und Tumorerkrankungen, Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler
| | | | | | | | - Markus Follmann
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V., Berlin
| | | | - Cihan Gani
- Klinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | - Andreas Geier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | - Martin Götz
- Medizinische Klinik IV - Gastroenterologie/Onkologie, Klinikverbund Südwest, Böblingen
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden
| | - Peter Huppert
- Radiologisches Zentrum, Max Grundig Klinik, Bühlerhöhe
| | - David Krug
- Strahlentherapie Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
| | - Christian La Fougère
- Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Hauke Lang
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Thomas Langer
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V., Berlin
| | - Philipp Lenz
- Zentrale Einrichtung Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster
| | - Tom Lüdde
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
| | - Andreas Mahnken
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | - Monika Nothacker
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V. (AWMF), Berlin
| | - Johann Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Karl Oldhafer
- Klinik für Leber-, Gallenwegs- und Pankreaschirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek
| | - Philipp Paprottka
- Sektion für Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
| | - Philippe Pereira
- Zentrum für Radiologie, Minimal-invasive Therapien und Nuklearmedizin, SLK-Klinken Heilbronn
| | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - Ruben Plentz
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Jürgen Pohl
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona
| | | | - Peter Reimer
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
| | | | | | - Elke Roeb
- Medizinische Klinik II Pneumologie, Nephrologie und Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
| | - Jörn Rüssel
- Medizinische Klinik IV Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)
| | - Barbara Schellhaas
- Medizinische Klinik I Gastroenterologie, Pneumologie und Endokrinologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Allgemeine Pathologie und pathologische Anatomie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Hans J Schlitt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
| | - Irene Schmid
- Kinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital, LMU München
| | - Andreas Schuler
- Medizinische Klinik, Gastroenterologie, Alb-Fils-Kliniken, Geislingen an der Steige
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - Marianne Sinn
- II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Knochenmarktransplantation mit Abteilung für Pneumologie), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Innere Medizin VI - Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | | | | | - Anne Taubert
- Klinische Sozialarbeit, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Bundesverband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V
| | - Jörg Trojan
- Medizinische Klinik 1: Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Allergologie, Endokrinologie und Diabetologie sowie Ernährungsmedizin, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | | | - Arndt Vogel
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Thomas Vogl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | - Frank Wacker
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | | | - Heiner Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Henning Wege
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Onkologie/Hämatologie, Gastroenterologie und Infektiologie, Klinikum Esslingen
| | - Dane Wildner
- Innere Medizin, Krankenhäuser Nürnberger Land GmbH, Standort Lauf
| | - Marcus-Alexander Wörns
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie und Endokrinologie, Klinikum Dortmund
| | - Peter Galle
- 1. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Nephrologie, Rheumatologie, Infektiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Nisar Malek
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bitzer M, Groß S, Albert J, Blödt S, Boda-Heggemann J, Brunner T, Caspari R, De Toni E, Dombrowski F, Evert M, Follmann M, Freudenberger P, Gani C, Geier A, Gkika E, Götz M, Helmberger T, Hoffmann RT, Huppert P, Krug D, Fougère CL, Lang H, Langer T, Lenz P, Lüdde T, Mahnken A, Nadalin S, Nguyen HHP, Nothacker M, Ockenga J, Oldhafer K, Paprottka P, Pereira P, Persigehl T, Plentz R, Pohl J, Recken H, Reimer P, Riemer J, Ritterbusch U, Roeb E, Rüssel J, Schellhaas B, Schirmacher P, Schlitt HJ, Schmid I, Schuler A, Seehofer D, Sinn M, Stengel A, Steubesand N, Stoll C, Tannapfel A, Taubert A, Tholen R, Trojan J, van Thiel I, Vogel A, Vogl T, Wacker F, Waidmann O, Wedemeyer H, Wege H, Wildner D, Wörns MA, Galle P, Malek N. S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Hepatozellulären Karzinoms“ – Langversion 4.0. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:e67-e161. [PMID: 38195102 DOI: 10.1055/a-2189-6353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bitzer
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Sabrina Groß
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Jörg Albert
- Katharinenhospital, Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Pneumologie, Stuttgart
| | - Susanne Blödt
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V.(AWMF), Berlin
| | | | - Thomas Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz
| | - Reiner Caspari
- Klinik Niederrhein Erkrankungen des Stoffwechsels der Verdauungsorgane und Tumorerkrankungen, Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler
| | | | | | | | - Markus Follmann
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V., Berlin
| | | | - Cihan Gani
- Klinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | - Andreas Geier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | - Martin Götz
- Medizinische Klinik IV - Gastroenterologie/Onkologie, Klinikverbund Südwest, Böblingen
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden
| | - Peter Huppert
- Radiologisches Zentrum, Max Grundig Klinik, Bühlerhöhe
| | - David Krug
- Strahlentherapie Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
| | - Christian La Fougère
- Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Hauke Lang
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Thomas Langer
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V., Berlin
| | - Philipp Lenz
- Zentrale Einrichtung Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster
| | - Tom Lüdde
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
| | - Andreas Mahnken
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | - Monika Nothacker
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V.(AWMF), Berlin
| | - Johann Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Karl Oldhafer
- Klinik für Leber-, Gallenwegs- und Pankreaschirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek
| | - Philipp Paprottka
- Sektion für Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
| | - Philippe Pereira
- Zentrum für Radiologie, Minimal-invasive Therapien und Nuklearmedizin, SLK-Klinken Heilbronn
| | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - Ruben Plentz
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Jürgen Pohl
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona
| | | | - Peter Reimer
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
| | | | | | - Elke Roeb
- Medizinische Klinik II Pneumologie, Nephrologie und Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
| | - Jörn Rüssel
- Medizinische Klinik IV Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)
| | - Barbara Schellhaas
- Medizinische Klinik I Gastroenterologie, Pneumologie und Endokrinologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Allgemeine Pathologie und pathologische Anatomie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | | | - Irene Schmid
- Kinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital, LMU München
| | - Andreas Schuler
- Medizinische Klinik, Gastroenterologie, Alb-Fils-Kliniken, Geislingen an der Steige
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - Marianne Sinn
- II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Knochenmarktransplantation mit Abteilung für Pneumologie), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Innere Medizin VI - Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | | | | | - Anne Taubert
- Klinische Sozialarbeit, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Bundesverband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V
| | - Jörg Trojan
- Medizinische Klinik 1: Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Allergologie, Endokrinologie und Diabetologie sowie Ernährungsmedizin, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | | | - Arndt Vogel
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Thomas Vogl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | - Frank Wacker
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | | | - Heiner Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Henning Wege
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Onkologie/Hämatologie, Gastroenterologie und Infektiologie, Klinikum Esslingen
| | - Dane Wildner
- Innere Medizin, Krankenhäuser Nürnberger Land GmbH, Standort Lauf
| | - Marcus-Alexander Wörns
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie und Endokrinologie, Klinikum Dortmund
| | - Peter Galle
- 1. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Nephrologie, Rheumatologie, Infektiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Nisar Malek
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
SHIRATO H. Biomedical advances and future prospects of high-precision three-dimensional radiotherapy and four-dimensional radiotherapy. PROCEEDINGS OF THE JAPAN ACADEMY. SERIES B, PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES 2023; 99:389-426. [PMID: 37821390 PMCID: PMC10749389 DOI: 10.2183/pjab.99.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Biomedical advances of external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with improvements in physical accuracy are reviewed. High-precision (±1 mm) three-dimensional radiotherapy (3DRT) can utilize respective therapeutic open doors in the tumor control probability curve and in the normal tissue complication probability curve instead of the one single therapeutic window in two-dimensional EBRT. High-precision 3DRT achieved higher tumor control and probable survival rates for patients with small peripheral lung and liver cancers. Four-dimensional radiotherapy (4DRT), which can reduce uncertainties in 3DRT due to organ motion by real-time (every 0.1-1 s) tumor-tracking and immediate (0.1-1 s) irradiation, have achieved reduced adverse effects for prostate and pancreatic tumors near the digestive tract and with similar or better tumor control. Particle beam therapy improved tumor control and probable survival for patients with large liver tumors. The clinical outcomes of locally advanced or multiple tumors located near serial-type organs can theoretically be improved further by integrating the 4DRT concept with particle beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki SHIRATO
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang S, Zhan W, Zeng N, Yang J, Xiong M, Liao W, Chen N, Xiao J. Dosimetric comparison in sparing normal tissue dosage by using auto-SBRT planning in oligo liver tumors. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1273042. [PMID: 38023203 PMCID: PMC10665725 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1273042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The study aimed to compare the dosimetric distribution of VMAT plans by increasing the number of half arcs in liver SBRT and investigate the effect by using automatic plan software in plan optimization. Method Thirty-one patients with oligo liver tumors were randomly selected. VMAT treatment plans with different numbers of coplanar half arcs were generated. Result Adding arcs significantly increased the PTV, D2%, D50%, and CI, but sacrificed the plan homogeneity. It also decreased the maximum dose of normal tissues such as the stomach, duodenum, and spinal cord and reduced Dmean, D500cc, and D700cc for the liver. Nevertheless, the diminishing effect gradually decayed into three arcs. Meanwhile, the addition of arcs substantially extended the beam-on time. Conclusion In the context of SBRT for oligo liver tumors, increasing the number of coplanar half arcs will improve PTV conformity and offer better protection for OARs, albeit at the expense of increased treatment duration. Considering the trade-off between plan quality and treatment efficiency, a three-arc plan may be more suitable for clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu Zhang
- Head and Neck Oncology Department, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Weiyi Zhan
- Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ni Zeng
- Head and Neck Oncology Department, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiangping Yang
- Head and Neck Oncology Department, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Maoqi Xiong
- West China Clinical Skills Training Center, West China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wenjun Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Nianyong Chen
- Head and Neck Oncology Department, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jianghong Xiao
- Radiotherapy Physics and Technology Center, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Uchinami Y, Kanehira T, Nakazato K, Fujita Y, Koizumi F, Takahashi S, Otsuka M, Yasuda K, Taguchi H, Nishioka K, Miyamoto N, Yokokawa K, Suzuki R, Kobashi K, Takahashi K, Katoh N, Aoyama H. Predicting the daily gastrointestinal doses of stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer based on the shortest distance between the tumor and the gastrointestinal tract using daily computed tomography images. BJR Open 2023; 5:20230043. [PMID: 37942491 PMCID: PMC10630971 DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20230043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives We aimed to investigate whether daily computed tomography (CT) images could predict the daily gastroduodenal, small intestine, and large intestine doses of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pancreatic cancer based on the shortest distance between the gross tumor volume (GTV) and gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Methods Twelve patients with pancreatic cancer received SBRT of 40 Gy in five fractions. We recalculated the reference clinical SBRT plan (PLANref) using daily CT images and calculated the shortest distance from the GTV to each GI tract. The maximum dose delivered to 0.5 cc (D0.5cc) was evaluated for each planning at-risk volume of the GI tract. Spearman's correlation test was used to determine the association between the daily change in the shortest distance (Δshortest distance) and the ratio of ΔD0.5cc dose to D0.5cc dose in PLANref (ΔD0.5cc/PLANref) for quantitative analysis. Results The median shortest distance in PLANref was 0 mm in the gastroduodenum (interquartile range, 0-2.7), 16.7 mm in the small intestine (10.0-23.7), and 16.7 mm in the large intestine (8.3-28.1 mm). The D0.5cc of PLANref in the gastroduodenum was >30 Gy in all patients, with 10 (83.3%) having the highest dose. A significant association was found between the Δshortest distance and ΔD0.5cc/ PLANref in the small or large intestine (p < 0.001) but not in the gastroduodenum (p = 0.404). Conclusions The gastroduodenum had a higher D0.5cc and predicting the daily dose was difficult. Daily dose calculations of the GI tract are recommended for safe SBRT. Advances in knowledge This study aimed to predict the daily doses in SBRT for pancreatic cancer from the shortest distance between the GTV and the gastrointestinal tract.Daily changes in the shortest distance can predict the daily dose to the small or large intestines, but not to the gastroduodenum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Uchinami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kanehira
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Keiji Nakazato
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Fujita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Fuki Koizumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Shuhei Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Manami Otsuka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Koichi Yasuda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Taguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kentaro Nishioka
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Naoki Miyamoto
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kohei Yokokawa
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Ryusuke Suzuki
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Keiji Kobashi
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Keita Takahashi
- Institute of Health Science Innovation for Medical Care, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Norio Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Aoyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yamazaki H, Shibuya K, Kimoto T, Suzuki M, Murakami M, Terashima K, Okimoto T, Iizumi T, Sakurai H, Wakatsuki M, Suzuki O, Katoh N, Arimura T, Ogino T, Takagi M, Araya M, Waki T, Matsumoto S, Ogino H, Fukumoto T, Ohtsuka M. Proton beam therapy for extrahepatic biliary tract cancer: Analysis with prospective multi-institutional patients' registration database, Proton-Net. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 41:100634. [PMID: 37234735 PMCID: PMC10206422 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose To examine the role of proton beam therapy (PBT) in the treatment of extrahepatic biliary tract cancer (EBC). Methods and materials We analyzed the data accumulated in the Proton-Net database, which prospectively registered all individual patient data treated with PBT in all Japanese proton institutions from May 2016 to June 2019. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Results Ninety-three patients with unresectable and/or recurrent EBC were treated with PBT using a median prescribed dose of 67.5 Gy (RBE) (range, 50-72.6 Gy) in 25 (22-30 fractions). With a median follow-up of 16.3 months, the median survival time was 20.1 months and the 2-year OS was 37.8%. Two-year PFS and LC rates were 20.6% and 66.5%, respectively. Poor liver function (Child-Pugh B, C), a narrower distance between the tumor and digestive tract (2 cm >), and a larger tumor diameter (2 cm <) were identified as poor prognostic factors for OS. PBT-related grade 3 ≤ acute and late adverse events occurred in 5.4% and 4.3% of patients, respectively, including one gastrointestinal late toxicity (duodenal ulcer). Conclusions This is the largest prospectively accumulated series of PBT for EBC, and PBT showed favorable outcomes with acceptable toxicity profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideya Yamazaki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kei Shibuya
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Takuya Kimoto
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Motohisa Suzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Kazuki Terashima
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Okimoto
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Takashi Iizumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Masaru Wakatsuki
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Osamu Suzuki
- Osaka Heavy Ion Administration Company, Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka-city, Osaka, Japan
| | - Norio Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takeshi Arimura
- Medipolis Proton Therapy and Research Center, Ibusuki, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Takashi Ogino
- Medipolis Proton Therapy and Research Center, Ibusuki, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Masaru Takagi
- Proton Therapy Center, Sapporo Teishinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Masayuki Araya
- Proton Therapy Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
| | - Takahiro Waki
- Department of Radiology, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, Tsuyama, Okayama, Japan
| | - Sae Matsumoto
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ogino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takumi Fukumoto
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ohtsuka
- Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bitzer M, Groß S, Albert J, Boda-Heggemann J, Brunner T, Caspari R, De Toni E, Dombrowski F, Evert M, Geier A, Gkika E, Götz M, Helmberger T, Hoffmann RT, Huppert P, Kautz A, Krug D, Fougère CL, Lang H, Lenz P, Lüdde T, Mahnken A, Nadalin S, Nguyen HHP, Ockenga J, Oldhafer K, Paprottka P, Pereira P, Persigehl T, Plentz R, Pohl J, Recken H, Reimer P, Riemer J, Ritterbusch U, Roeb E, Rüssel J, Schellhaas B, Schirmacher P, Schlitt HJ, Schmid I, Schuler A, Seehofer D, Sinn M, Stengel A, Stoll C, Tannapfel A, Taubert A, Tholen R, Trojan J, van Thiel I, Vogel A, Vogl T, Wacker F, Waidmann O, Wedemeyer H, Wege H, Wildner D, Wörns MA, Galle P, Malek N. S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie biliärer Karzinome – Langversion. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2023; 61:e92-e156. [PMID: 37040776 DOI: 10.1055/a-2026-1240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bitzer
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Sabrina Groß
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Jörg Albert
- Katharinenhospital, Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Pneumologie, Stuttgart
| | | | - Thomas Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz
| | - Reiner Caspari
- Klinik Niederrhein Erkrankungen des Stoffwechsels der Verdauungsorgane und Tumorerkrankungen, Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler
| | | | | | | | - Andreas Geier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | - Martin Götz
- Medizinische Klinik IV - Gastroenterologie/Onkologie, Klinikverbund Südwest, Böblingen
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden
| | - Peter Huppert
- Radiologisches Zentrum, Max Grundig Klinik, Bühlerhöhe
| | | | - David Krug
- Strahlentherapie Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
| | - Christian La Fougère
- Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Hauke Lang
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Philipp Lenz
- Zentrale Einrichtung Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster
| | - Tom Lüdde
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
| | - Andreas Mahnken
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschrirugie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | - Johann Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Karl Oldhafer
- Klinik für Leber-, Gallenwegs- und Pankreaschirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek
| | - Philipp Paprottka
- Sektion für Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
| | - Philippe Pereira
- Zentrum für Radiologie, Minimal-invasive Therapien und Nuklearmedizin, SLK-Klinken Heilbronn
| | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - Ruben Plentz
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Jürgen Pohl
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona
| | | | - Peter Reimer
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
| | | | | | - Elke Roeb
- Medizinische Klinik II Pneumologie, Nephrologie und Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
| | - Jörn Rüssel
- Medizinische Klinik IV Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)
| | - Barbara Schellhaas
- Medizinische Klinik I Gastroenterologie, Pneumologie und Endokrinologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Allgemeine Pathologie und pathologische Anatomie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | | | - Irene Schmid
- Kinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital, LMU München
| | - Andreas Schuler
- Medizinische Klinik, Gastroenterologie, Alb-Fils-Kliniken, Geislingen an der Steige
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - Marianne Sinn
- II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Knochenmarktransplantation mit Abteilung für Pneumologie), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Innere Medizin VI - Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | | | - Anne Taubert
- Klinische Sozialarbeit, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Bundesverband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V
| | - Jörg Trojan
- Medizinische Klinik 1: Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Allergologie, Endokrinologie und Diabetologie sowie Ernährungsmedizin, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | | | - Arndt Vogel
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Thomas Vogl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | - Frank Wacker
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | | | - Heiner Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Henning Wege
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Onkologie/Hämatologie, Gastroenterologie und Infektiologie, Klinikum Esslingen
| | - Dane Wildner
- Innere Medizin, Krankenhäuser Nürnberger Land GmbH, Standort Lauf
| | - Marcus-Alexander Wörns
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie und Endokrinologie, Klinikum Dortmund
| | - Peter Galle
- 1. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Nephrologie, Rheumatologie, Infektiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Nisar Malek
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Paronetto C, den Toom W, Milder MTW, van Norden Y, Baak R, Heijmen BJM, Méndez Romero A. Inter- and intrafraction dose variations in robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in the prospective phase I STRONG trial. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1114737. [PMID: 36969072 PMCID: PMC10032458 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1114737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Using fiducial-marker-based robotic respiratory tumor tracking, we treated perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients in the STRONG trial with 15 daily fractions of 4 Gy. For each of the included patients, in-room diagnostic-quality repeat CTs (rCT) were acquired pre- and post-dose delivery in 6 treatment fractions to analyze inter- and intrafraction dose variations. Planning CTs (pCTs) and rCTs were acquired in expiration breath-hold. Analogous to treatment, spine and fiducials were used to register rCTs with pCTs. In each rCT, all OARs were contoured, and the target was rigidly copied from the pCT based on grey values. The rCTs acquired were used to calculate the doses to be delivered through the treatment-unit settings. On average, target doses in rCTs and pCTs were similar. However, due to target displacements relative to the fiducials in rCTs, 10% of the rCTs showed PTV coverage losses of >10%. Although target coverages had been planned below desired values in order to protect OARs, many pre-rCTs contained OAR constraint violations: 44.4% for the 6 major constraints. Most OAR dose differences between pre- and post-rCTs were not statistically significant. The dose deviations observed in repeat CTs represent opportunities for more advanced adaptive approaches to enhancing SBRT treatment quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Paronetto
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Radiotherapy, Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV), Padova, Italy
- *Correspondence: Chiara Paronetto, ,
| | - Wilhelm den Toom
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maaike T. W. Milder
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Yvette van Norden
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rogier Baak
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ben J. M. Heijmen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Alejandra Méndez Romero
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Song J, Di Y, Kang X, Ren G, Wang Y. Development and validation of a nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival with unresected cholangiocarcinoma undergoing external radiotherapy. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1012069. [PMID: 36817916 PMCID: PMC9932201 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1012069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To analyze the prognostic factors of patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) who were unresected and received radiotherapy to establish a nomogram model for the prediction of patient cancer-specific survival (CSS). Methods Suitable patient cases were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, prognostic factors were analyzed by Lasso, Cox regression, and nomogram was developed based on independent prognostic factors to predict 6 and 12 months CSS. The consistency index (C-index), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were tested for the predictive efficacy of the model, respectively. Results The primary site, tumor size, T-stage, M-stage, and chemotherapy (P < 0.05) were identified as independent risk factors after Cox and Lasso regression analysis. Patients in training cohort had a 6 months CSS rates was 68.6 ± 2.6%, a 12-month CSS rates was 49.0 ± 2.8%. The median CSS time of 12.00 months (95% CI: 10.17-13.83 months). The C-index was 0.664 ± 0.039 for the training cohort and 0.645 ± 0.042 for the validation cohort. The nomogram predicted CSS and demonstrated satisfactory and consistent predictive performance in 6 (73.4 vs. 64.9%) and 12 months (72.2 vs. 64.9%), respectively. The external validation calibration plot is shown AUC for 6- and 12-month compared with AJCC stage was (71.2 vs. 63.0%) and (65.9 vs. 59.8%). Meanwhile, the calibration plot of the nomogram for the probability of CSS at 6 and 12 months indicates that the actual and nomogram predict that the CSS remains largely consistent. DCA showed that using a nomogram to predict CSS results in better clinical decisions compared to the AJCC staging system. Conclusion A nomogram model based on clinical prognostic characteristics can be used to provide CSS prediction reference for patients with CCA who have not undergone surgery but have received radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiazhao Song
- Department of Radiotherapy, Air Force Medical Center, PLA, Beijing, China,Graduate School, Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, Hebei, China
| | - Yupeng Di
- Department of Radiotherapy, Air Force Medical Center, PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoli Kang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Air Force Medical Center, PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Gang Ren
- Department of Radiotherapy, Air Force Medical Center, PLA, Beijing, China,Department of Radiotherapy, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yingjie Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Air Force Medical Center, PLA, Beijing, China,*Correspondence: Yingjie Wang ✉
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Evaluation of short-term gastrointestinal motion and its impact on dosimetric parameters in stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 39:100576. [PMID: 36686564 PMCID: PMC9852488 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study is to quantify the short-term motion of the gastrointestinal tract (GI-tract) and its impact on dosimetric parameters in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pancreatic cancer. Methods The analyzed patients were eleven pancreatic cancer patients treated with SBRT or proton beam therapy. To ensure a fair analysis, the simulation SBRT plan was generated on the planning CT in all patients with the dose prescription of 40 Gy in 5 fractions. The GI-tract motion (stomach, duodenum, small and large intestine) was evaluated using three CT images scanned at spontaneous expiration. After fiducial-based rigid image registration, the contours in each CT image were generated and transferred to the planning CT, then the organ motion was evaluated. Planning at risk volumes (PRV) of each GI-tract were generated by adding 5 mm margins, and the volume receiving at least 33 Gy (V33) < 0.5 cm3 was evaluated as the dose constraint. Results The median interval between the first and last CT scans was 736 s (interquartile range, IQR:624-986). To compensate for the GI-tract motion based on the planning CT, the necessary median margin was 8.0 mm (IQR: 8.0-10.0) for the duodenum and 14.0 mm (12.0-16.0) for the small intestine. Compared to the planned V33 with the worst case, the median V33 in the PRV of the duodenum significantly increased from 0.20 cm3 (IQR: 0.02-0.26) to 0.33 cm3 (0.10-0.59) at Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p = 0.031). Conclusion The short-term motions of the GI-tract lead to high dose differences.
Collapse
Key Words
- 4DCT, four-dimensional computed tomography,
- CTV, clinical target volume
- FFF, flattening filter-free
- GI-tract, gastrointestinal tract
- GTV, gross tumor volume
- Gastrointestinal tract
- IQR, interquartile range
- Intra-fractional motion
- MV, mega-voltage
- PRV, planning at risk volume
- PTV, planning target volume
- Pancreatic cancer
- ROI, region of interest
- SBRT
- SBRT, stereotactic body radiation therapy
- SD, standard deviation
- Short-term organ motion
- VMAT, volumetric modulated arc therapy
Collapse
|
15
|
Yamazaki H, Kimoto T, Suzuki M, Murakami M, Suzuki O, Takagi M, Katoh N, Arimura T, Ogino T, Ogino H. Particle Beam Therapy for Intrahepatic and Extrahepatic Biliary Duct Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Data Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235864. [PMID: 36497346 PMCID: PMC9736951 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
To examine the efficacy and toxicity of particle beam therapy (PT) for biliary duct carcinoma (BDC) and compare the outcomes between extrahepatic BDC (eBDC) and intrahepatic BDC (iBDC). We analyzed multi-institutional data from May 2009 to December 2019. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. We included 150 patients with unresectable BDC treated with PT using a median prescribed dose of 70.2 GyRBE (range, 44-77 GyRBE) in 25 fractions (range, 10-38 fractions). With a median follow-up of 13.0 months, median survival time (MST) was 21 months, and 2-year OS was 44.8%. For eBDC and iBDC, the MSTs were 20 and 23 months, respectively. Two-year PFS and LC rates were 20.6% and 66.5%, respectively. Vascular invasion, prescribed dose and serum tumor marker level (carcinoembryonic antigen: CEA) were identified as poor prognostic factors for OS. A higher radiation dose EQD2 ≥ 67 Gy showed superior OS, with a hazard ratio of 0.341. The radiation dose of PT is an important predisposing factor for overall survival. The MST for patients with eBDC given a higher radiation dose was 25 months, compared to 15 months for those given the lower dose and 23 months for patients with iBDC (all iBDC given higher doses). iBDC and eBDC duct carcinomas showed equivalent outcomes with PT, especially when treated with a high radiation dose. In detailed analysis, baseline CEA level in iBDC, and radiation dose and GTV in eBDC were statistically significant predicators for OS. Acute and late toxicity grade ≥3 occurred in 2.2% and 2.7% of patients, respectively, including two late grade-5 toxicities. In conclusion, PT showed good efficacy for BDC, both eBDC and iBDC, with a low incidence of severe toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideya Yamazaki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
- Correspondence:
| | - Takuya Kimoto
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
| | - Motohisa Suzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama 963-8052, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama 963-8052, Japan
| | - Osamu Suzuki
- Osaka Heavy Ion Administration Company, Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka 540-0008, Japan
| | - Masaru Takagi
- Proton Therapy Center, Sapporo Teishinkai Hospital, Sapporo 065-0033, Japan
| | - Norio Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Takeshi Arimura
- Medipolis Proton Therapy and Research Center, Ibusuki, Kagoshima 891-0304, Japan
| | - Takashi Ogino
- Medipolis Proton Therapy and Research Center, Ibusuki, Kagoshima 891-0304, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ogino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya 462-8508, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hashimoto Y, Komatsu S, Terashima K, Tsugawa D, Yanagimoto H, Suga M, Demizu Y, Tokumaru S, Okimoto T, Sasaki R, Ajiki T, Fukumoto T. Space-Making Particle Therapy for Unresectable Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Dig Surg 2022; 39:99-108. [PMID: 35462363 DOI: 10.1159/000524582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although the primary treatment option for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) has been surgical resection, most patients present with unresectable advanced tumors at the time of diagnosis. Particle therapy (PT) holds great potential for HC, even though the anatomical proximity to the gastrointestinal tract prevents delivering a radical dose to the tumor. Space-making PT (SMPT), consisting of spacer placement surgery and subsequent PT, has been developed to minimize complications and maximize the therapeutic benefit of dose escalation for HC. This study aimed to conduct a dosimetric evaluation and examine the effectiveness of SMPT for the treatment of HC. METHODS Between 2007 and 2018, 12 patients with unresectable HC treated with SMPT were enrolled. The treatment outcomes and effectiveness of spacer placement surgery were evaluated through analyses of pre- and post-surgical parameters of dose-volume histograms. RESULTS All patients completed the planned SMPT protocol. The median survival time was 29.6 months, and the 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 82.5% and 45.8%, respectively. The mean V95% value (volume irradiated with 95% of the planned treatment dose) of the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume after spacer placement surgery improved to 98.5% and 96.6% from preoperative values of 85.6% and 78.1%, respectively (p = 0.0196 and p = 0.0053, respectively). Grade 3 or higher adverse events after SMPT were seen in 6 patients. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION SMPT led to improvements in dosimetric parameters and showed good feasibility and excellent outcomes. SMPT can be a promising novel alternative for unresectable HC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Hashimoto
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Shohei Komatsu
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kazuki Terashima
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan
| | - Daisuke Tsugawa
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Yanagimoto
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Masaki Suga
- Department of Radiation Physics, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan
| | - Yusuke Demizu
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Japan
| | - Sunao Tokumaru
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Okimoto
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan
| | - Ryohei Sasaki
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Ajiki
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takumi Fukumoto
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bitzer M, Voesch S, Albert J, Bartenstein P, Bechstein W, Blödt S, Brunner T, Dombrowski F, Evert M, Follmann M, La Fougère C, Freudenberger P, Geier A, Gkika E, Götz M, Hammes E, Helmberger T, Hoffmann RT, Hofmann WP, Huppert P, Kautz A, Knötgen G, Körber J, Krug D, Lammert F, Lang H, Langer T, Lenz P, Mahnken A, Meining A, Micke O, Nadalin S, Nguyen HP, Ockenga J, Oldhafer K, Paprottka P, Paradies K, Pereira P, Persigehl T, Plauth M, Plentz R, Pohl J, Riemer J, Reimer P, Ringwald J, Ritterbusch U, Roeb E, Schellhaas B, Schirmacher P, Schmid I, Schuler A, von Schweinitz D, Seehofer D, Sinn M, Stein A, Stengel A, Steubesand N, Stoll C, Tannapfel A, Taubert A, Trojan J, van Thiel I, Tholen R, Vogel A, Vogl T, Vorwerk H, Wacker F, Waidmann O, Wedemeyer H, Wege H, Wildner D, Wittekind C, Wörns MA, Galle P, Malek N. S3-Leitlinie – Diagnostik und Therapie biliärer Karzinome. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2022; 60:e186-e227. [PMID: 35148560 DOI: 10.1055/a-1589-7854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- M Bitzer
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | - S Voesch
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | - J Albert
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Stuttgart
| | - P Bartenstein
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, LMU Klinikum, München
| | - W Bechstein
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Transplantations- und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
| | - S Blödt
- AWMF-Geschäftsstelle, Berlin
| | - T Brunner
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg
| | - F Dombrowski
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
| | - M Evert
- Institut für Pathologie, Regensburg
| | - M Follmann
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, c/o Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e.V., Berlin
| | - C La Fougère
- Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Tübingen
| | | | - A Geier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
| | - E Gkika
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | | | - E Hammes
- Lebertransplantierte Deutschland e. V., Ansbach
| | - T Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal-invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen, München
| | - R T Hoffmann
- Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Dresden
| | - W P Hofmann
- Gastroenterologie am Bayerischen Platz, medizinisches Versorgungszentrum, Berlin
| | - P Huppert
- Radiologisches Zentrum, Max Grundig Klinik, Bühl
| | - A Kautz
- Deutsche Leberhilfe e.V., Köln
| | - G Knötgen
- Konferenz onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege, Hamburg
| | - J Körber
- Klinik Nahetal, Fachklinik für onkologische Rehabilitation und Anschlussrehabilitation, Bad Kreuznach
| | - D Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel
| | | | - H Lang
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
| | - T Langer
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, c/o Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e.V., Berlin
| | - P Lenz
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Zentrale Einrichtung Palliativmedizin, Münster
| | - A Mahnken
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Marburg
| | - A Meining
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II des Universitätsklinikums Würzburg
| | - O Micke
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld
| | - S Nadalin
- Universitätsklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | | | - J Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Bremen
| | - K Oldhafer
- Klinik für Leber-, Gallenwegs- und Pankreaschirurgie, Semmelweis Universität, Asklepios Campus Hamburg
| | - P Paprottka
- Abteilung für interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
| | - K Paradies
- Konferenz onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege, Hamburg
| | - P Pereira
- Abteilung für interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
| | - T Persigehl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | | | - R Plentz
- Klinikum Bremen-Nord, Innere Medizin, Bremen
| | - J Pohl
- Interventionelles Endoskopiezentrum und Schwerpunkt Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg
| | - J Riemer
- Lebertransplantierte Deutschland e. V., Bretzfeld
| | - P Reimer
- Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe gGmbH, Karlsruhe
| | - J Ringwald
- Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | | | - E Roeb
- Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Gießen
| | - B Schellhaas
- Medizinische Klinik I, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - P Schirmacher
- Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - I Schmid
- Zentrum Pädiatrische Hämatologie und Onkologie, Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital, Klinikum der Universität München
| | - A Schuler
- Medizinische Klinik, Alb Fils Kliniken GmbH, Göppingen
| | | | - D Seehofer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - M Sinn
- Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - A Stein
- Hämatologisch-Onkologischen Praxis Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - A Stengel
- Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | | | - C Stoll
- Klinik Herzoghöhe Bayreuth, Bayreuth
| | - A Tannapfel
- Institut für Pathologie der Ruhr-Universität Bochum am Berufsgenossenschaftlichen Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Bochum
| | - A Taubert
- Kliniksozialdienst, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Bochum
| | - J Trojan
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main
| | | | - R Tholen
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie e. V., Köln
| | - A Vogel
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Endokrinologie der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
| | - T Vogl
- Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Frankfurt
| | - H Vorwerk
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Marburg
| | - F Wacker
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
| | - O Waidmann
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main
| | - H Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
| | - H Wege
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - D Wildner
- Innere Medizin, Krankenhäuser Nürnberger Land GmbH, Lauf an der Pegnitz
| | - C Wittekind
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig
| | - M A Wörns
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Mainz, Mainz
| | - P Galle
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Mainz, Mainz
| | - N Malek
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Thuehøj AU, Andersen NC, Worm ES, Høyer M, Tabaksblat EM, Weber B, Mortensen HR. Clinical outcomes after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:197-201. [PMID: 34726565 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1995893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Esben Schjødt Worm
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Morten Høyer
- Danish Centre of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Britta Weber
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Danish Centre of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Hanna Rahbek Mortensen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Danish Centre of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cha MJ, Cuculich PS, Robinson CG, Chang JH. Tailored stereotactic radiotherapy technique using deep inspiration breath-hold to reduce stomach dose for cardiac radioablation. Radiat Oncol J 2021; 39:167-173. [PMID: 34610655 PMCID: PMC8497870 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2021.00276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To provide a new insight on a novel safe cardiac radioablation using deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) to reduce gastrointestinal dose. Materials and Methods For treating incessant ventricular tachycardia (VT) originated from left ventricle inferior scar abutting the stomach, a target delineation and treatment planning for cardiac radioablation was performed. With four different computed tomography (CT) scan protocols—DIBH, full expiration breath-hold, four-dimensional (4D) CT without and with abdominal compression, the distances between the target and the stomach were compared. Results Among the protocols, the CT scan with DIBH showed largest distance between the target and the stomach and selected for the treatment planning. The prescribed dose was 25 Gy in a single fraction, and satisfactory dosimetric parameters were achieved with the DIBH. The patient was successfully treated with the DIBH, and experienced no acute toxicity. Conclusion To gain the best benefit from cardiac radioablation, understanding the possible toxicity in the adjacent organs is crucial. By moving the heart with thoraco-diaphragmatic movement by DIBH, the target could be physically separated from the stomach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myung-Jin Cha
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Phillip S Cuculich
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Ji Hyun Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Baak R, Willemssen FEJA, van Norden Y, Eskens FALM, Milder MTW, Heijmen BJM, Koerkamp BG, Sprengers D, van Driel LMJW, Klümpen HJ, den Toom W, Koedijk MS, IJzermans JNM, Méndez Romero A. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy after Chemotherapy for Unresectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: The STRONG Trial, a Phase I Safety and Feasibility Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13163991. [PMID: 34439146 PMCID: PMC8394718 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13163991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The role of radiotherapy in the treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma has not yet been properly defined. In this prospective study, we therefore explored the addition to first-line chemotherapy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) delivered in 15 fractions. Patients eligible for the study had been diagnosed with unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, and then had no progressive disease after completing treatment with 6–8 cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine. Primary endpoints were feasibility and safety. Secondary endpoints were local control, progression-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life. As each patient completed the SBRT successfully and no dose-limiting toxicity was found, we consider this treatment to be both feasible and safe. The local control rate and overall survival were promising. However, due to the small sample size of this study, we urge the analysis of this treatment in a larger series of patients. Abstract Background: In unresectable pCCA, the standard of care is palliative chemotherapy. We investigated the feasibility and safety of adding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) after chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with unresectable pCCA, stage T1-T4N0-N1M0, ECOG 0-1, having finished 6–8 cycles of cisplatin and gemcitabine without disease progression were eligible. SBRT was planned in 15 fractions of 3.0–4.5 Gy. The primary endpoints were feasibility (defined as completing SBRT as planned) and toxicity, evaluated within 3 months after SBRT (CTCAE v4.03). A conventional “3 + 3” design was used, corresponding to a sample size of 6 patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade ≥ 4 hepatobiliary or grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. The secondary endpoints, measured from the start of radiotherapy, were local control, progression-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life (QoL). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03307538. Results: Six patients were enrolled between November 2017 and March 2020. SBRT was delivered as planned. All patients were treated with 60Gy (15 × 4.0Gy). No SBRT-related DLT was observed. The most common grade ≥ 3 toxicity was cholangitis (n = 5). The median follow-up was 14 months. The 12-month local control rate was 80%. We observed no substantial changes in QoL. Conclusion: In patients with unresectable pCCA with stable disease after palliative chemotherapy, adding SBRT is feasible and safe. The observed local control merits an additional evaluation of effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rogier Baak
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (Y.v.N.); (M.T.W.M.); (B.J.M.H.); (W.d.T.); (A.M.R.)
- Correspondence:
| | - François E. J. A. Willemssen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Yvette van Norden
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (Y.v.N.); (M.T.W.M.); (B.J.M.H.); (W.d.T.); (A.M.R.)
| | - Ferry A. L. M. Eskens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Maaike T. W. Milder
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (Y.v.N.); (M.T.W.M.); (B.J.M.H.); (W.d.T.); (A.M.R.)
| | - Ben J. M. Heijmen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (Y.v.N.); (M.T.W.M.); (B.J.M.H.); (W.d.T.); (A.M.R.)
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (B.G.K.); (J.N.M.I.)
| | - Dave Sprengers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (D.S.); (L.M.J.W.v.D.)
| | - Lydi M. J. W. van Driel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (D.S.); (L.M.J.W.v.D.)
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Wilhelm den Toom
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (Y.v.N.); (M.T.W.M.); (B.J.M.H.); (W.d.T.); (A.M.R.)
| | - Merel S. Koedijk
- Radiotherapeutisch Instituut Friesland, 8934 AD Leeuwarden, The Netherlands;
| | - Jan N. M. IJzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (B.G.K.); (J.N.M.I.)
| | - Alejandra Méndez Romero
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (Y.v.N.); (M.T.W.M.); (B.J.M.H.); (W.d.T.); (A.M.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Oertel M, Gattermann F, Schmidt H, Eich HT. Examining the Use of Radiation Therapy for Cholangiocarcinoma: Benefits through Modern Techniques. Oncol Res Treat 2021; 44:408-413. [PMID: 34289480 DOI: 10.1159/000517533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare malignant tumor of the bile duct epithelium. At first diagnosis, only a minority of patients are eligible for surgery, which is regarded as the only curative treatment. This study examines the role of radiation therapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the definitive and adjuvant treatment situation. METHODS The monocentric, retrospective analysis included 39 patients with CCA undergoing 53 RT courses. Data were collected from January 2005 to September 2018. There were 11 cases of CRT, 6 of which were definitive. Surgery was either palliative (n = 6) or radical (n = 15). RESULTS After RT, the median overall survival (OS) was 10.4 months (m), median progression-free survival was 5.6 m, and median duration of local control (DOLC) was 8.9 m. There was a significant difference in survival between patients with and without locoregional lymph node metastasis (OS: 4.3 vs. 15.4 m, p = 0.031). After treatment of a primary tumor, DOLC was about twice as long as in the recurrent situation (10.4 vs. 5.4 m, p = 0.032). Conservative therapy significantly elevated the risk of local recurrence compared to radical surgery in univariate and multivariate analyses. Side effects were mostly classified as mild to moderate. Termination of RT and increased alanine aminotransferase were significantly less frequent after stereotactic body radiation therapy and hypofractionation. CONCLUSION RT can achieve local control in patients with CCA. Toxicities of RT are manageable but require close clinical and laboratory follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Felix Gattermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Hartmut Schmidt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Hans Theodor Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yoon SM, Luterstein E, Chu FI, Cao M, Lamb J, Agazaryan N, Low D, Raldow A, Steinberg ML, Lee P. Clinical outcomes of stereotactic magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiotherapy for primary and metastatic tumors in the abdomen and pelvis. Cancer Med 2021; 10:5897-5906. [PMID: 34288538 PMCID: PMC8419771 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers ablative doses with excellent local control. However, implementing SBRT for abdominal and pelvic tumors has been limited by the risk for treatment‐related gastrointestinal toxicity. MRI‐guided radiotherapy may ameliorate these risks and increase the therapeutic ratio. We report the clinical outcomes of stereotactic MRI‐guided adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) for primary and metastatic tumors in the abdomen and pelvis. Methods From November 2014 to August 2017, the first 106 consecutive patients with 121 tumors in the abdomen and pelvis were treated with SMART at a single institution. Of the cohort, 41.5%, 15.1%, and 43.4% had primary, locally recurrent, and oligometastatic tumors, respectively. SMART was delivered using a tri‐cobalt‐60 gantry with on‐board 0.35 Tesla MRI with respiratory breath‐hold and daily adaptive re‐planning when anatomically necessary. A median of 40Gy in five fractions was prescribed. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.03 was used to score treatment‐related toxicities. Local control (LC), progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan–Meier method. Results Of the 510 treatments, seventy‐one (13.9%) were adapted. Fatigue, nausea, and pain were the most common acute toxicities. 0.9 and 0% of patients experienced acute grade three and four toxicities, respectively. 5.2 and 2.1% of patients experienced late grade three and four toxicities, respectively. After a median follow‐up of 20.4 months, the 2‐year LC rate was 74% on a per‐lesion basis. Two‐year LC was 96% for lesions that were treated with BED10≥100 versus 69% for BED10<100 (p = 0.02). PFS was significantly different between patients with and without locally controlled tumors (2‐year PFS 21 vs. 8%, p = 0.03). Two‐year OS was 57% for the entire cohort. Conclusions Favorable LC and PFS outcomes were observed with minimal morbidity for tumors in the abdomen and pelvis treated with SMART. Future prospective clinical trials to validate these findings are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elaine Luterstein
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Fang-I Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James Lamb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nzhde Agazaryan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ann Raldow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Renzulli M, Ramai D, Singh J, Sinha S, Brandi N, Ierardi AM, Albertini E, Sacco R, Facciorusso A, Golfieri R. Locoregional Treatments in Cholangiocarcinoma and Combined Hepatocellular Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3336. [PMID: 34283065 PMCID: PMC8268054 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a primary and aggressive cancer of the biliary tree. Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) is a distinctive primary liver malignancy which has properties of both hepatocytic and cholangiocytic differentiation. CHC appears to have a worse prognosis compared to hepatocellular carcinoma, and similar to that of intrahepatic CCA. While significant advances have been made in understanding the pathophysiology and treatment of these two tumor types, their prognosis remains poor. Currently, liver resection is the primary treatment modality; however, only a minority of patients are eligible for surgery. However, the use of locoregional therapies proves an alternative approach to treating locally advanced disease with the aim of converting to resectability or even transplantation. Locoregional therapies such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and photodynamic therapy (PDT) can provide patients with tumor control and increase the chances of survival. In this review, we appraise the evidence surrounding the use of locoregional therapies in treating patients with CCA and CHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Renzulli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (N.B.); (R.G.)
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York, NY 11201, USA; (D.R.); (S.S.)
| | - Jameel Singh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mather Hospital, Northwell Health, Port Jefferson, New York, NY 11777, USA;
| | - Samridhi Sinha
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York, NY 11201, USA; (D.R.); (S.S.)
| | - Nicolò Brandi
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (N.B.); (R.G.)
| | - Anna Maria Ierardi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital, 20142 Milan, Italy;
| | - Elisa Albertini
- Pathology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Rodolfo Sacco
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; (R.S.); (A.F.)
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; (R.S.); (A.F.)
| | - Rita Golfieri
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (N.B.); (R.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Boldrini L, Corradini S, Gani C, Henke L, Hosni A, Romano A, Dawson L. MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Liver Malignancies. Front Oncol 2021; 11:616027. [PMID: 33869001 PMCID: PMC8047407 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.616027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
MR guided radiotherapy represents one of the most promising recent technological innovations in the field. The possibility to better visualize therapy volumes, coupled with the innovative online adaptive radiotherapy and motion management approaches, paves the way to more efficient treatment delivery and may be translated in better clinical outcomes both in terms of response and reduced toxicity. The aim of this review is to present the existing evidence about MRgRT applications for liver malignancies, discussing the potential clinical advantages and the current pitfalls of this new technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Boldrini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Lauren Henke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Ali Hosni
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Angela Romano
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Laura Dawson
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gkika E, Hawkins MA, Grosu AL, Brunner TB. The Evolving Role of Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 10:604387. [PMID: 33381458 PMCID: PMC7768034 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.604387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a disease entity comprising diverse epithelial tumors, which are categorized according to their anatomical location as intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA), distal (dCCA) cholangiocarcinomas, and gallbladder carcinomas (GBC), with distinct epidemiology, biology, and prognosis. Complete surgical resection is the mainstay in operable BTC as it is the only potentially curative treatment option. Nevertheless, even after curative (R0) resection, the 5-year survival rate ranges between 20 and 40% and the disease free survival rates (DFS) is approximately 48–65% after one year and 23–35% after three years without adjuvant treatment. Improvements in adjuvant chemotherapy have improved the DFS, but the role of adjuvant radiotherapy is unclear. On the other hand, more than 50% of the patients present with unresectable disease at the time of diagnosis, which limits the prognosis to a few months without treatment. Herein, we review the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma in the curative and palliative setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maria A Hawkins
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas B Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), result of pancreatobiliary diseases is a challenging condition. Most patients with MBO are inoperable at the time of diagnosis, and the disease is poorly controlled using external-beam radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Biliary stent therapy emerged as a promising strategy for alleviating MBO and prolonging life. However, physicians find it difficult to determine the optimal type of biliary stent for the palliation of MBO. Here, we review the safety and efficacy of available biliary stents, used alone or in combination with brachytherapy, photodynamic therapy and advanced chemotherapeutics, in patients with pancreatobiliary malignancies and put forward countermeasures involving stent obstruction. Furthermore, 3D-printing stents and nanoparticle-loaded stents have broad application prospects for fabricating tailor-made biliary stents.
Collapse
|
27
|
Wu T, Jiang X, Zhang X, Wu B, Xu B, Liu X, Zheng L, Wang Y. Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: State of the Art of FGFR Inhibitors. Cancer Control 2021; 28:1073274821989314. [PMID: 33618536 PMCID: PMC8482710 DOI: 10.1177/1073274821989314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), the second most common type of primary liver tumor, has an increasing incidence in the past few decades. iCCA is highly malignant, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 5-10%. Surgical resection is usually the prescribed treatment for patients with early stage iCCA; however, patients are usually in an advanced stage iCCA upon diagnosis. Currently, targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy and other comprehensive treatment measures have been mainly adopted as palliative treatment measures. As a common candidate of targeted therapy, FGFR inhibitors have demonstrated their unique advantages in clinical trials. At present, the prospect of FGFR targeted therapy is encouraging. The landscape of FGFR inhibitors in iCCA is needed to be showed urgently. METHODS We searched relative reports of clinical trials on FGFR inhibitors in PubMed as well as Web of Science. We also concluded other available clinical trials of FGFR inhibitors (Data were collected from clinicaltrials.gov). RESULTS Several relatively effective targeted drugs are being used in clinical trials. Some preliminary results indicate the outlook of targeted therapy such as BGJ398, TAS120, and HSP90 inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS In summary, FGFR targeted therapy has broad prospects for the treatment of iCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianyu Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaoqing Jiang
- Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xin Zhang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Bodeng Wu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Bin Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaoliu Liu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Italian Clinical Practice Guidelines on Cholangiocarcinoma - Part II: Treatment. Dig Liver Dis 2020; 52:1430-1442. [PMID: 32952071 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Currently, the only curative treatment for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is surgical resection, though this treatment is possible in less than 40% of patients. However, recent improvements in preoperative management have led to a higher number of patients who are candidates for this procedure. For unresectable patients, progress is ongoing in terms of locoregional and chemoradiation treatments and target therapies, especially in the definition of patient selection criteria. This is the second part of the Italian CCA guidelines, dealing with CCA treatment, that have been formulated in accordance with Italian National Institute of Health indications and developed according to the GRADE method and related advancements.
Collapse
|
29
|
Alanazi SA, Alanazi F, Haq N, Shakeel F, Badran MM, Harisa GI. Lipoproteins-Nanocarriers as a Promising Approach for Targeting Liver Cancer: Present Status and Application Prospects. Curr Drug Deliv 2020; 17:826-844. [PMID: 32026776 DOI: 10.2174/1567201817666200206104338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The prevalence of liver cancer is increasing over the years and it is the fifth leading cause of mortality worldwide. The intrusive features and burden of low survival rate make it a global health issue in both developing and developed countries. The recommended chemotherapy drugs for patients in the intermediate and advanced stages of various liver cancers yield a low response rate due to the nonspecific nature of drug delivery, thus warranting the search for new therapeutic strategies and potential drug delivery carriers. There are several new drug delivery methods available to ferry the targeted molecules to the specific biological environment. In recent years, the nano assembly of lipoprotein moieties (lipidic nanoparticles) has emerged as a promising and efficiently tailored drug delivery system in liver cancer treatment. This increased precision of nano lipoproteins conjugates in chemotherapeutic targeting offers new avenues for the treatment of liver cancer with high specificity and efficiency. This present review is focused on concisely outlining the knowledge of liver cancer diagnosis, existing treatment strategies, lipoproteins, their preparation, mechanism and their potential application in the treatment of liver cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saleh A Alanazi
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fars Alanazi
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nazrul Haq
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faiyaz Shakeel
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed M Badran
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Gamaleldin I Harisa
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma Treated With Proton Beam Therapy. Am J Clin Oncol 2020; 43:180-186. [PMID: 31764017 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical outcomes and failure patterns of patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CC) who had been treated with proton beam therapy (PBT). METHODS The authors retrospectively examined 30 patients with unresectable CC who had undergone PBT between November 2015 and December 2017. Survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent predictors of survival were identified by multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Complications were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. RESULTS The median tumor size was 7 cm. Seventeen patients (56.7%) had regional lymph node metastases. The median radiation dose was 72.6 cobalt gray equivalents, and 23 patients (76.7%) received concurrent chemotherapy. The 1-year local control, regional control, and distant metastases-free rates were 88%, 86%, and 68%, respectively. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 19.3 and 10.4 months, respectively. The median jaundice-free survival was 13 months, with a 1-year biliary tract infection (BTI)-free rate of 58%. Patients who received concurrent chemotherapy had a better median progression-free survival (12.1 vs. 4.7 mo). The most common form of acute toxicity from PBT was acute skin reactions which were rarely severe (grade III: 7% of patients). Three and 2 patients had grade III-IV toxicities and radiation-induced liver disease. There were no deaths caused by PBT or concurrent chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS PBT is clinically useful in patients with unresectable CC, even in the presence of large tumors or regional nodal metastases. Its use may induce durable symptom relief, without increasing acute or late toxicity.
Collapse
|
31
|
Siddiqui O, Pollock A, Samanta S, Kaiser A, Molitoris JK. Proton Beam Therapy in Liver Malignancies. Curr Oncol Rep 2020; 22:30. [PMID: 32108284 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-020-0889-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Proton beam therapy (PBT) allows for improved sparing of surrounding normal tissues compared with X-ray-based radiation therapy. This is especially important in the setting of liver malignancies, where an increase in integral dose leads to a higher risk of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) as well as close proximity to vital gastrointestinal (GI) organs. RECENT FINDINGS We have data from multiple centers demonstrating that PBT can safely deliver high, ablative doses of radiation therapy conferring excellent local control with good tolerance of treatment. PBT is an effective treatment with longstanding evidence of efficacy that is increasing in availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Siddiqui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Ariel Pollock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Santanu Samanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Adeel Kaiser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Jason K Molitoris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wu L, Merath K, Farooq A, Hyer JM, Tsilimigras DI, Paredes AZ, Mehta R, Sahara K, Shen F, Pawlik TM. Photodynamic therapy may provide a benefit over systemic chemotherapy among non-surgically managed patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2020; 121:286-293. [PMID: 31742706 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic chemotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC), however, the survival benefit of chemotherapy is limited. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been associated with improved survival among patients with advanced ECC, yet utilization of PDT remains low. We sought to compare the outcomes of patients with unresectable ECC following treatment with PDT versus chemotherapy. METHODS A review of the National Cancer Database was conducted to identify patients with ECC who were nonsurgically managed between 2004 and 2013. Overall survival (OS) of patients receiving PDT vs systemic chemotherapy was compared using propensity score matching. RESULTS After propensity matching (PDT, n = 59; chemotherapy, n = 177), 5-year OS was 17.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.0%-28.6%) among patients who underwent PDT vs 3.8% (95%CI, 0.4%-14.0%) among patients receiving chemotherapy (P < .001). On multivariable analysis PDT was associated with an OS benefit (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95%CI, 0.52-0.998; P = .048). Subset analysis of patients receiving PDT only (n = 45) and patients receiving chemotherapy demonstrated similar results. In subset analysis of patients undergoing PDT-only vs PDT-chemotherapy, OS was comparable. CONCLUSION PDT was associated with a survival benefit compared with chemotherapy alone among patients with unresectable ECC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Wu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepato-biliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Katiuscha Merath
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Ayesha Farooq
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| | - J Madison Hyer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Diamantis I Tsilimigras
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Anghela Z Paredes
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Rittal Mehta
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Kota Sahara
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Feng Shen
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepato-biliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zhang A, Liu B, Xu D, Sun Y. Advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated using anlotinib and microwave ablation: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e18435. [PMID: 31876723 PMCID: PMC6946271 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000018435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) accounts for 10% to 15% of all primary hepatic carcinomas. However, there are no effective drug treatment strategies against ICC, and surgery is currently the only curative treatment. Here, we present a case of ICC successfully treated with anlotinib, a novel oral agent. PATIENT CONCERNS The patient was a 66-year-old Han Chinese woman, and she was a retired worker. The patient had no history of hepatitis B infection or hypertension. Physical examination showed no abnormalities, and the patient showed no conscious discomfort. However, ultrasound revealed liver occupation. DIAGNOSIS Liver ultrasound and enhanced computed tomography (CT) indicated liver cancer with intrahepatic metastasis. Serum carbohydrate antigen 199 and alpha fetoprotein levels were high at 4270 and 1561 ng/mL, respectively. Pathologic findings of CT-guided liver biopsy revealed an adenocarcinoma. Owing to further immunohistochemical staining and clinical results, a diagnosis of ICC was made. INTERVENTIONS The patient had received 5 cycles of transhepatic arterial chemotherapy and embolization and 1 cycle of microwave ablation. Due to rapid tumor progression and loss of liver function, systemic chemotherapy was contraindicated. As second-line therapy, she received anlotinib, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits tumor angiogenesis and proliferative signaling and has been used to treat refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer that shows progression despite treatment with ≥2 chemotherapy regimens. OUTCOMES This patient showed a partial response after 2 cycles of treatment with anlotinib (12 mg daily, days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle). Drug-related side effects, such as hypertension and hand foot skin reaction, were observed. After 4 cycles of anlotinib, the efficacy appeared to be stable, and the patient showed a progression-free survival period of almost 4 months. However, the patient's condition worsened and she died of liver failure 6 months after treatment (overall survival, almost 6 months). CONCLUSION Some cases of ICC may be responsive to the antiangiogenic drug, anlotinib, when combined with microwave ablation. Randomized clinical studies are required to further confirm the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in the clinical treatment of ICC.
Collapse
|
34
|
Kuznetsova S, Grendarova P, Roy S, Sinha R, Thind K, Ploquin N. Structure guided deformable image registration for treatment planning CT and post stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) Primovist ® (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced MRI. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:109-118. [PMID: 31755658 PMCID: PMC6909124 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of structure‐guided deformable image registration (SG‐DIR) relative to rigid registration and DIR using TG‐132 recommendations. This assessment was performed for image registration of treatment planning computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans with Primovist® contrast agent acquired post stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). SBRT treatment planning CT scans and posttreatment Primovist® MRI scans were obtained for 14 patients. The liver was delineated on both sets of images and matching anatomical landmarks were chosen by a radiation oncologist. Rigid registration, DIR, and two types of SG‐DIR (using liver contours only; and using liver structures along with anatomical landmarks) were performed for each set of scans. TG‐132 recommended metrics were estimated which included Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Mean Distance to Agreement (MDA), Target Registration Error (TRE), and Jacobian determinant. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. The median (range) DSC for rigid registration was 0.88 (0.77–0.89), 0.89 (0.81–0.93) for DIR, and 0.90 (0.86–0.94) for both types of SG‐DIR tested in this study. The median MDA was 4.8 mm (3.7–6.8 mm) for rigid registration, 3.4 mm (2.4–8.7 mm) for DIR, 3.2 mm (2.0–5.2 mm) for SG‐DIR where liver structures were used to guide the registration, and 2.8 mm (2.1–4.2 mm) for the SG‐DIR where liver structures and anatomical landmarks were used to guide the registration. The median TRE for rigid registration was 7.2 mm (0.5–23 mm), 6.8 mm (0.7–30.7 mm) for DIR, 6.1 mm (1.1–20.5 mm) for the SG‐DIR guided by only the liver structures, and 4.1 mm (0.8–19.7 mm) for SG‐DIR guided by liver contours and anatomical landmarks. The SG‐DIR shows higher liver conformality as per TG‐132 metrics and lowest TRE compared to rigid registration and DIR in Velocity AI software for the purpose of registering treatment planning CT and post‐SBRT MRI for the liver region. It was found that TRE decreases when liver contours and corresponding anatomical landmarks guide SG‐DIR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svetlana Kuznetsova
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Petra Grendarova
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Soumyajit Roy
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Program, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rishi Sinha
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kundan Thind
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nicolas Ploquin
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Luterstein E, Cao M, Lamb JM, Raldow A, Low D, Steinberg ML, Lee P. Clinical Outcomes Using Magnetic Resonance-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma. Adv Radiat Oncol 2019; 5:189-195. [PMID: 32280818 PMCID: PMC7136637 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Previous studies have shown that stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) increases local control for cholangiocarcinoma, but gastrointestinal toxicity resulting from this treatment approach remains a concern. SABR using magnetic resonance–guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) may improve the therapeutic ratio of treatment for cholangiocarcinoma patients given the radiosensitivity of neighboring gastrointestinal organs. Methods Seventeen consecutive patients with unresectable locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma were treated with SABR using MRgRT between May 2015 and August 2017, subsequent to our previously reported series of patients treated using a standard Linac with cone beam computed tomography. Twelve patients presented with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and 5 patients with intrahepatic tumors. MRgRT-based SABR was administered at a median dose of 40 Gy in 5 fractions. Results The median overall survival (OS) was 18.5 months, with a 1-year OS of 76% and 2-year OS of 46.1%. Three of the 17 patients progressed locally, yielding a 1-year local control of 85.6% and a 2-year local control of 73.3%. Although 12 of 17 patients experienced an acute grade 1 toxicity, none experienced acute grade 2 toxicities. One patient had an acute grade 3 duodenal ulcer with perforation (6%), and one patient had a late radiation-related toxicity grade 2 gastritis/colitis. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate diminished toxicity and excellent overall survival and local control. The clinical outcomes and safety profile of SABR delivered with MRgRT suggest that MRgRT is a promising treatment approach for treating cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Luterstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - James M Lamb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ann Raldow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Daniel Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Cholangiocarcinoma: Optimizing Locoregional Control With Elective Nodal Irradiation. Adv Radiat Oncol 2019; 5:77-84. [PMID: 32051893 PMCID: PMC7004929 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To review our institutional experience of treating cholangiocarcinoma using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods and Materials A total of 40 patients with intrahepatic (n = 25) or perihilar (n = 15) cholangiocarcinoma treated with SBRT were retrospectively reviewed. SBRT was delivered in 1 to 5 fractions with median dose of 40 Gy. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate cumulative incidence of local in-field, local out-of-field, regional, and distant failure. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to calculate overall survival (OS). Toxicity was scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Results The median follow-up time was 18 months. The 1-year incidence of local in-field, local out-of-field, regional, and distant failure was 8%, 23%, 13%, and 22%, respectively. Median OS was 23 months and 1- and 2-year OS rates were 69% and 39%, respectively. Patients with perihilar tumors had a 1-year incidence of regional failure of 24% and worse OS (P = .013). Patients with regional failure were more likely to develop distant metastases, 32% versus 19% at 1 year (P = .11). Acute grade 3 + hepatobiliary toxicity developed in 15 patients (36%). Conclusions In this series of cholangiocarcinoma patients treated with definitive SBRT, patterns of failure reveal that regional failures are not insignificant, particularly for perihilar tumors. Elective nodal irradiation of regional lymphatics should be considered when using SBRT. A prospective study of elective nodal irradiation in patients with perihilar tumors would further clarify whether this approach improves outcomes without increasing hepatobiliary toxicity.
Collapse
|
37
|
Sebastian NT, Tan Y, Miller ED, Williams TM, Alexandra Diaz D. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is associated with improved overall survival compared to chemoradiation or radioembolization in the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2019; 19:66-71. [PMID: 31517072 PMCID: PMC6734105 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Revised: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a highly lethal malignancy. For patients with locally advanced, unresectable disease, numerous liver-directed therapy options exist, including chemoradiation (CRT), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and transarterial radioembolization (TARE). There is no randomized data to inform clinicians regarding the optimal treatment modality. Method We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to study the overall survival (OS) of patients with ICC treated with CRT, SBRT, and TARE. We used Cox proportional hazards modeling and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to account for confounding variables. Results We identified 170 patients with unresected ICC treated with SBRT (n = 37), CRT (n = 61), or TARE (n = 72). SBRT was associated with higher OS compared to CRT (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.68; p = 0.001) and TARE (HR = 0.40; 95% CI 0.22-0.74; p = 0.003). On multivariable analysis, SBRT remained associated with higher OS compared to CRT (HR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.21-0.91; p = 0.028) and TARE (HR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.21-0.84; p = 0.014). After IPTW (Bonferroni-adjusted significance threshold, α = 0.017), SBRT again had a statistically significant association with higher OS compared to CRT (HR = 0.22; 95% CI 0.11-0.44; p < 0.0001) and was nominally associated TARE (HR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.37-0.91; p = 0.019). Conclusions We found SBRT is associated with higher OS when compared to CRT or TARE for the treatment of unresectable ICC. Due to the retrospective nature of the study and potential selection bias, these findings should be evaluated prospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil T Sebastian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, 460 W. 10 Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Yubo Tan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 320 Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Drive, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Eric D Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, 460 W. 10 Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Terence M Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, 460 W. 10 Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Dayssy Alexandra Diaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, 460 W. 10 Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Le Bon M, Lapeyre M, Moreau J, Bellière-Calandry A, Pezet D, Abergel A, Bellini R, Kwiatkowski F, Verrelle P, Martin F, Benoît C. [Tolerance of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for hepatic tumours]. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:385-394. [PMID: 31300328 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Revised: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of stereotactic radiation therapy for primary and secondary liver tumours in Jean-Perrin cancer centre (Clermont-Ferrand, France) in terms of efficacy and safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between December 2013 and June 2016, 25 patients were included. Treatment was performed on a linear accelerator Novalis TX®. The prescription dose was 42 to 60Gy in three to five fractions. Local control at 1 year was evaluated with modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST) and RECIST criteria. Acute and late toxicity were evaluated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 criteria. RESULTS Median follow-up was 10.5 months. Treatment tolerance was good with few side effects grade 3 or above, no acute toxicity and only one late toxicity. We have highlighted that hepatic artery haemorrhage was associated with the presence of a biliary prosthesis in contact with the artery (P=0.006) and in the irradiation field. There was no correlation with the dose delivered to the artery and hepatic artery haemorrhage. CONCLUSION Stereotactic radiation therapy for liver tumours allows a good local control with few secondary effects. Caution should be exercised when treating patients with biliary prostheses in the vicinity of the target volume because there is a risk of haemorrhage of the hepatic artery in contact with the prosthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Le Bon
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France; Département de radiothérapie, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, promenade Léa-et-Napoléon-Bullukian, 69008 Lyon, France.
| | - M Lapeyre
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - J Moreau
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - A Bellière-Calandry
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - D Pezet
- Département de chirurgie digestive et hépatobiliaire, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, 1, rue Lucie-Aubrac, 63100 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - A Abergel
- Département d'hépato-gastroentérologie, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, 1, rue Lucie-Aubrac, 63100 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - R Bellini
- Département de radiologie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - F Kwiatkowski
- Département de physique médicale, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - P Verrelle
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - F Martin
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - C Benoît
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kasuya G, Terashima K, Shibuya K, Toyama S, Ebner DK, Tsuji H, Okimoto T, Ohno T, Shioyama Y, Nakano T, Kamada T. Carbon-ion radiotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional study by and the Japan carbon-ion radiation oncology study group (J-CROS). Oncotarget 2019; 10:4369-4379. [PMID: 31320991 PMCID: PMC6633891 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for cholangiocarcinoma via a multicenter retrospective study. Clinical data were collected from patients with cholangiocarcinoma who had received CIRT at one of four treating institutions in Japan. Of 56 eligible patients, none received surgery for cholangiocarcinoma before or after CIRT. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Based on the tumor site, the 56 cases were categorized as intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) (n=27) or perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) (n=29). In all patients, the median tumor size was 37 (range, 15‒110) mm, and the most commonly prescribed dose was 76 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 20 fractions. The median survival was 14.8 (range, 2.1-129.2) months, and the 1- and 2-year OS rates were 69.7% and 40.9%, respectively. The median survival times of the patients with IHC and those with PHC were 23.8 and 12.6 months, respectively. Both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that cholangitis pre-CIRT and Child‒Pugh class B were significant prognostic factors for an unfavorable OS. Of four patients who died of liver failure, one with IHC was suspected to have radiation-induced liver disease because of newly developed ascites, and died at 4.3 months post-CIRT. Grade 3 CIRT-related bile duct stenosis was observed in one IHC case. No other CIRT-related severe adverse events, including gastrointestinal events, were observed. These results suggest that CIRT yields relatively favorable treatment outcomes, especially for patients with IHC, and acceptable toxicities were observed in patients with cholangiocarcinoma who did not receive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Goro Kasuya
- QST Hospital (Former Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kazuki Terashima
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan
| | - Kei Shibuya
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Shingo Toyama
- Ion Beam Therapy Center, SAGA-HIMAT Foundation, Tosu, Japan
| | - Daniel K Ebner
- QST Hospital (Former Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.,Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hiroshi Tsuji
- QST Hospital (Former Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Okimoto
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan
| | | | - Takashi Nakano
- QST Hospital (Former Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tadashi Kamada
- QST Hospital (Former Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Jung C, Lavole J, Barret M, Abou Ali E, Palmieri LJ, Dermine S, Barré A, Chaussade S, Coriat R. Local Therapy in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: A Review of Current Endoscopic, Medical, and Oncologic Treatment Options. Oncology 2019; 97:191-201. [DOI: 10.1159/000500832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
|
41
|
Zheng WH, Yu T, Luo YH, Wang Y, Liu YF, Hua XD, Lin J, Ma ZH, Ai FL, Wang TL. Clinical efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin-based transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with radiotherapy in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 11:489-498. [PMID: 31236199 PMCID: PMC6580316 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i6.489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical surgical resection is regarded as the best treatment for hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma. However, 60%-70% of patients have lost the chance of surgery at the time of diagnosis. Simple biliary stent or drainage tube placement may fail in a short time due to tumor invasion or overgrowth, bile accumulation, or biofilm formation. Effective palliative treatments to extend the effective drainage time are of great significance for improving the quality of life of patients and changing the prognosis of patients.
AIM To investigate the clinical efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin-based transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radiotherapy in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients clinically diagnosed with hilar cholangiocarcinoma from June 2014 to January 2017 at the Liaoning Provincial Cancer Hospital. Patients were evaluated by specialists, and those who were not suitable for surgery or unwilling to undergo surgery and met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. There were a total of 72 patients (34 males and 38 females) with an average age of 59.9 years (range, 40-72 years). According to percutaneous transhepatic biliary angiography and the patients’ wishes, stent implantation or biliary drainage tube implantation was used to relieve biliary obstruction. The patients were divided into either a control group or a combined treatment group according to their follow-up treatment. The control group consisted of a total of 35 patients who received simple biliary drainage tube placement and biliary stent implantation (7 patients with bilateral stents and 6 with a unilateral stent) and 22 patients receiving biliary drainage tube placement alone. The combined treatment group received TACE and extracorporeal radiotherapy after biliary drainage or biliary stent implantation and consisted of a total of 37 patients, including 21 patients receiving combined treatment after biliary stent placement (14 patients with bilateral stents and 7 with a unilateral stent) and 16 undergoing combined therapy after implanting the biliary drainage tube. In the combination treatment group, the TACE chemotherapy regimen employed gemcitabine and cisplatin, and the embolic agent was iodized oil. A particular dose was determined according to the patient's body surface area and the tumor staining indicated by DSA. In vitro radiotherapy was performed with intensity-modulated radiotherapy or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy at an average dose of 48.3 Gy. Both groups were followed from stent implantation or drainage tube implantation until the patient quitted or died. The median length of follow-up observation was 13 mo. The differences in overall survival time and the effect of different jaundice reducing methods (single stent, double stent, or biliary drainage) on the patency time and survival time of biliary stents were compared between the two groups; the related factors affecting overall survival time were analyzed.
RESULTS The median survival time of the control group was 10.5 mo; the median survival time of patients with biliary stent implantation and those with percutaneous biliary drainage was 9.6 mo and 11.4 mo, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between them. The median survival time of the combined treatment group was 20.0 mo, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Among patients in the combined treatment group, the median survival time of patients who underwent biliary stent implantation and those who accepted percutaneous biliary drainage before the combination therapy was 19.5 mo and 20.1 mo, respectively, and there was no significant difference between them. In the combination treatment group, the mean time of median stent patency was 15.6 mo, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (7.0 mo; P < 0.05). The independent factors affecting survival time included age, whether to receive combination therapy, percutaneous biliary drainage tube implantation, and Bismuth-Corlette classification as type IV.
CONCLUSION Gemcitabine and cisplatin-based TACE combined with radiotherapy can prolong the survival of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Independent predictors of survival include selection of combination therapy, Bismuth-Corlette classification as type IV, selection of percutaneous biliary drainage tube implantation, and age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Heng Zheng
- Department of Medical Imaging, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Tao Yu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Ya-Hong Luo
- Department of Medical Imaging, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Medical Imaging, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Ye-Fu Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Xiang-Dong Hua
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Jie Lin
- Department of General Surgery (VIP ward), Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Zuo-Hong Ma
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Fu-Lu Ai
- Department of General Surgery (VIP ward), Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Tian-Lu Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Koo T, Park HJ, Kim K. Radiation therapy for extrahepatic bile duct cancer: Current evidences and future perspectives. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7:1242-1252. [PMID: 31236388 PMCID: PMC6580339 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i11.1242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC) is a rare malignancy that involves neoplastic changes extending from both hepatic ducts to the common bile duct. The treatment of choice is surgical resection, but the predominant pattern of initial treatment failure is locoregional recurrence. Accordingly, adjuvant radiotherapy has been administered after surgical resection based on these rationales. At this time, there is minimal evidence supporting adjuvant radiotherapy, because there have been no phase III trials evaluating its benefit. Relatively small retrospective studies have tried to compare outcomes associated with EBDC treated with or without radiotherapy. We aimed to review studies investigating adjuvant radiotherapy for resected EBDC. Because less than one-third of EBDC cases are amenable to curative resection at diagnosis, other locoregional treatment modalities need to be considered, including radiotherapy. The next aim of this review was to summarize reports of definitive radiotherapy for unresectable EBDC. Patients with advanced EBDC often experience biliary obstruction, which can lead to jaundice and progress to death. Biliary stent insertion is an important palliative procedure, but stents are prone to occlusion after subsequent ingrowth of the EBDC. Radiotherapy can be effective for maintaining the patency of inserted stents. We also reviewed the benefit of palliative radiotherapy combined with the biliary stent insertion. Lastly, we discuss the existing gaps in the evidence supporting radiotherapy in the management of EBDC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taeryool Koo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang 14068, South Korea
| | - Hae Jin Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04763, South Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul 07985, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Brunner TB, Blanck O, Lewitzki V, Abbasi-Senger N, Momm F, Riesterer O, Duma MN, Wachter S, Baus W, Gerum S, Guckenberger M, Gkika E. Stereotactic body radiotherapy dose and its impact on local control and overall survival of patients for locally advanced intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2019; 132:42-47. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Revised: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
44
|
Frakulli R, Buwenge M, Macchia G, Cammelli S, Deodato F, Cilla S, Cellini F, Mattiucci GC, Bisello S, Brandi G, Parisi S, Morganti AG. Stereotactic body radiation therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20180688. [PMID: 30673295 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been used in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CC) but toxicity and clinical results of SBRT in CC are still limited and sparse. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to analyze the results of SBRT in the setting of advanced CC. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library using the PRISMA methodology. Studies including at least 10 patients with diagnosis of advanced CC regardless of tumor site and other treatments were included. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were local control (LC) and toxicity rates. The ROBINS-I risk of bias tool was used. RESULTS 10 studies (231 patients) fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in this review. All but one study showed moderate to serious risk of bias. Median follow up was 15 months (range: 7.8-64.0 months). Pooled 1 year OS was 58.3% (95% CI: 50.2-66.1%) and pooled 2 year OS was 35.5% (95% CI: 22.1-50.1%). Pooled 1 year LC was 83.4%, (95% CI: 76.5-89.4%). The reported toxicities were acceptable and manageable with only one treatment-related death. CONCLUSION The role of SBRT in CC is not yet supported by robust evidence in literature. However, within this limit, preliminary results seem almost comparable to the ones of standard chemotherapy or chemoradiation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE SBRT seems effective in terms of LC with acceptable treatment-related toxicities. Therefore, SBRT can be considered a therapeutic option at least in selected patients with CC, possibly combined with adjuvant chemotherapy (CHT).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rezarta Frakulli
- 1 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- 1 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- 2 Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione "Giovanni Paolo II", Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Campobasso , Italy
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- 1 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- 2 Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione "Giovanni Paolo II", Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Campobasso , Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- 3 Medical Physic Unit, Fondazione "Giovanni Paolo II", Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Campobasso , Italy
| | - Francesco Cellini
- 4 Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Gian C Mattiucci
- 4 Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Silvia Bisello
- 1 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Giovanni Brandi
- 5 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Cancer Research, University of Bologna , Bologna , Italy
| | - Salvatore Parisi
- 6 Unit of Radiotherapy, IRCCS"Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza" San Giovanni Rotondo , Italy
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- 1 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lee J, Yoon WS, Koom WS, Rim CH. Efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy for unresectable or recurrent cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Strahlenther Onkol 2019; 195:93-102. [PMID: 30206644 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1367-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Non-surgical treatment including stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have been used practically as alternative modalities for unresectable or recurrent cholangiocarcinoma (CC). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy of SBRT for such patients. METHODS Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane library databases were searched systematically until October 2017. Primary endpoint was 1‑year local control (LC) rate; 1‑year overall survival (OS), response rates, and grade ≥3 toxicities were assessed as secondary endpoints. RESULTS Eleven studies (226 patients) were included. The prescribed median SBRT dose was 45 (range 30-55) Gy in 3-5 fractions. The pooled 1‑year LC rate was 81.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 69.4-89.9%) in the studies using an equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2) ≥71.3 Gy2 and 74.7% (95% CI 57.1-86.7%) in the studies using an EQD2 <71.3 Gy2. The median OS was 13.6 (range 10-35.5) months. The pooled 1‑year OS rate was 53.8% (95% CI 44.9-62.5%) and the pooled 1‑year LC rate was 78.6% (95% CI 69.0-85.8%). Most common toxicity was duodenal ulcer and gastric ulcer in available studies, with the acute incidence of grade ≥3 of less than 10% and the late incidence of 10-20%. CONCLUSIONS SBRT was a feasible treatment option with respect to achieving a high LC for unresectable or recurrent CC. Gastrointestinal toxicity is acceptable, but remains an obstacle related to dose escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeongshim Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (Republic of)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea (Republic of)
| | - Won Sup Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, 123 Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, 15355, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, Korea (Republic of)
| | - Woong Sub Koom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (Republic of)
| | - Chai Hong Rim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, 123 Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, 15355, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, Korea (Republic of).
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Boimel PJ, Binder KR, Hong TS, Feng M, Ben-Josef E. Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cases: An Expert Panel Case-Based Discussion. Semin Radiat Oncol 2018; 28:351-361. [PMID: 30309645 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2018.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder malignancies are aggressive gastrointestinal malignancies with management dependent on resectability, comorbidities, and location. A multidisciplinary discussion with medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and surgeons is necessary to determine the optimal treatment approach for each patient. Surgical resection offers the best chance for a long-term cure. Recent studies, such as the phase II SWOG S0809 and the phase III BILCAP study have highlighted the importance of adjuvant treatment with radiation therapy and chemotherapy, respectively, in resected disease. In patients with unresectable disease chemotherapy and chemoradiation therapy to a high dose can improve overall survival and locoregional control. In this expert panel we have brought together radiation oncologists and a medical oncologist to provide case-based feedback on their institutional practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela J Boimel
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kim Reiss Binder
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mary Feng
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Edgar Ben-Josef
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Koedijk MS, Heijmen BJM, Groot Koerkamp B, Eskens FALM, Sprengers D, Poley JW, van Gent DC, van der Laan LJW, van der Holt B, Willemssen FEJA, Méndez Romero A. Protocol for the STRONG trial: stereotactic body radiation therapy following chemotherapy for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, a phase I feasibility study. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e020731. [PMID: 30327398 PMCID: PMC6196820 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), surgery is the only treatment modality that can result in cure. Unfortunately, in the majority of these patients, the tumours are found to be unresectable at presentation due to either local invasive tumour growth or the presence of distant metastases. For patients with unresectable CCA, palliative chemotherapy is the standard treatment yielding an estimated median overall survival (OS) of 12-15.2 months. There is no evidence from randomised trials to support the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for CCA. However, small and most often retrospective studies combining chemotherapy with SBRT have shown promising results with OS reaching up to 33-35 months. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study has been designed as a single-centre phase I feasibility trial and will investigate the addition of SBRT after standard chemotherapy in patients with unresectable perihilar CCA (T1-4 N0-1 M0). A total of six patients will be included. SBRT will be delivered in 15 fractions of 3-4.5 Gy (risk adapted). The primary objective of this study is to determine feasibility and toxicity. Secondary outcomes include local tumour control, progression-free survival (PFS), OS and quality of life. Length of follow-up will be 2 years. As an ancillary study, the personalised effects of radiotherapy will be measured in vitro, in patient-derived tumour and bile duct organoid cultures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval for the STRONG trial has been granted by the Medical Ethics Committee of Erasmus MC Rotterdam, the Netherlands. It is estimated that all patients will be included between October 2017 and October 2018. The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03307538; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel S Koedijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben J M Heijmen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ferry A L M Eskens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dave Sprengers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dik C van Gent
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luc J W van der Laan
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bronno van der Holt
- Department of Haematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - François E J A Willemssen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
|
49
|
The effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization in recurrent hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma after resection. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0198138. [PMID: 29879137 PMCID: PMC5991684 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) can present as a hypervascular or peripherally enhancing tumor in dynamic imaging. We evaluated the effect of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) on prognosis according to post-operative recurrence imaging patterns. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 42 cHCC-CC and 59 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC-control) patients at the Asan Medical Center. We classified recurrent cHCC-CC according to enhancement pattern (globally enhancing: GE cHCC-CC, peripherally enhancing: PE cHCC-CC) and evaluated tumor response, time-to-local progression (TTPlocal), and overall survival (OS). Results The GE cHCC-CC group had a significantly higher best objective response rate (complete remission + partial response) than the PE cHCC-CC group (36% vs 0%, P = 0.005), and it was comparable to that of the HCC-control group (35.6%, P = 0.97). TTPlocal in the GE cHCC-CC group was significantly shorter than in the HCC-control group (6.6 vs 27.1 months, P < 0.001), and was not significantly different from that in the PE cHCC-CC group (5.3 months, P = 0.12). OS was 12.4 months, 52.8 months, and 67.5 months in the PE cHCC-CC, GE cHCC-CC, and HCC-control groups, respectively (Ps < 0.05). The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for TTPlocal and OS revealed an independent association with enhancement pattern of recurrent cHCC-CC (TTPlocal: HR 2.46; 95% CI 1.10–5.46; P = 0.03; OS: HR 5.97; 95% CI 2.38–14.96; P < 0.001). Conclusions The GE cHCC-CC group showed better response and prognosis after TACE than the PE cHCC-CC group, but poorer response and prognosis than the HCC-control group. Enhancement patterns at recurrence were crucially associated with tumor response and overall survival.
Collapse
|
50
|
McDuff SGR, Remillard KA, Zheng H, Raldow AC, Wo JY, Eyler CE, Drapek LC, Goyal L, Blaszkowsky LS, Clark JW, Allen JN, Parikh AR, Ryan DP, Ferrone CR, Tanabe KK, Wolfgang JA, Zhu AX, Hong TS. Liver reirradiation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastasis. Pract Radiat Oncol 2018; 8:414-421. [PMID: 29937235 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Revised: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of administering liver reirradiation to patients with primary liver tumors or liver metastasis. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 49 patients (with 64 individual tumors) who received liver reirradiation at our institution between June 2008 and December 2016 were identified for retrospective review. Patients were treated to the same, different, or a combination of previously treated liver tumors for recurrent primary (53%) or metastatic (47%) disease using photons or protons. Clinical and treatment-related factors were compiled and patients were monitored for toxicity and evidence of classic or nonclassic radiation-induced liver disease. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and cumulative incidence of local failure (LF) was used to estimate LF using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. RESULTS The median age at the time of reirradiation was 72 years and the median interval between radiation courses was 9 months. At a median follow-up of 10.5 months, 36 patients (73%) had died, 9 patients (18%) were alive, and 4 patients (8%) were lost to follow-up. The median survival for the cohort was 14 months. The overall 1-year estimate of LF was 46.4%. The 1-year estimates of LF for liver metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma were 61.0% and 32.5%, respectively. The average prescription dose was similar between the reirradiation and initial courses (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions EQD2: 65.0 vs 64.3 Gyα/β = 10, respectively) but the average dose to the untreated liver was lower at the time of reirradiation (EQD2: 10.5 vs 13.9 Gyα/β = 3, respectively, P = .01). Among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, the average normal liver dose was significantly larger for patients who exhibited a worsening of Child-Pugh score after reirradiation compared with those who did not (1210 cGy vs 759 cGy, P = .04). With regard to toxicity, 85.7% of patients experienced grade 1 to 2 toxicity, 4.1% developed grade 3, and only 2 patients (4.1%) met the criteria for radiation-induced liver disease after reirradiation. CONCLUSIONS Liver reirradiation may be an effective and safe option for select patients; however, further prospective study is necessary to establish treatment guidelines and recommended dosing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan G R McDuff
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Kyla A Remillard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Physics and Dosimetry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hui Zheng
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ann C Raldow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christine E Eyler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lorraine C Drapek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lipika Goyal
- Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lawrence S Blaszkowsky
- Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey W Clark
- Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jill N Allen
- Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aparna R Parikh
- Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David P Ryan
- Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Cristina R Ferrone
- Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kenneth K Tanabe
- Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John A Wolfgang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Physics and Dosimetry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew X Zhu
- Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|