1
|
Lertbutsayanukul C, Pitak M, Nantavithya C. Long-term oncological outcomes of hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated whole breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost in early-stage breast cancer. Radiat Oncol J 2022; 40:141-150. [PMID: 35796117 PMCID: PMC9262705 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2021.00927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose For patients with early breast cancer who undergo breast-conserving surgery, adjuvant whole breast irradiation (WBI) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) results in lower radiotherapy fractions. Published studies have shown that both conventional fraction with SIB (C-SIB) and hypofractionation with SIB (H-SIB) seem to be safe and feasible. In this study, we sought to compare the oncologic outcomes between C-SIB and H-SIB in early-stage breast cancer. Materials and Methods Stage I–II breast cancer patients who received adjuvant WBI with SIB between January 2008 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The radiation dose in the C-SIB group was 50 Gy and 65 Gy in 25 daily fractions, while in the H-SIB group, it was 43.2 Gy and 52.8 Gy in 16 daily fractions to the whole breast and tumor bed, respectively. Results A total of 188 patients, 103 in the C-SIB group and 85 in the H-SIB group, were included. With a median follow-up time of 87 months, 7-year locoregional control of C-SIB was comparable to H-SIB (95.8% vs. 97.4%, p = 0.964). The 7-year distant metastasis-free survival rates of C-SIB and H-SIB were 89.9% and 95.9% (p = 0.111), while the 7-year disease-free survival rates were 84.2% and 95.4%, respectively (p = 0.176). In multivariate analysis, there was no significant prognostic factor associated with better overall survival. Conclusion H-SIB provided comparable locoregional control to C-SIB. With the advantage of a shorter radiotherapy course, H-SIB could be a favorable option for WBI in early-stage breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chawalit Lertbutsayanukul
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Manida Pitak
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chonnipa Nantavithya
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
- Correspondence: Chonnipa Nantavithya Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, 1873, Rama 4 Rd., Bangkok 10330, Thailand. Tel: +66-2564334 E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yu T, Li Y, Sun T, Xu M, Wang W, Shao Q, Zhang Y, Li J, Yu J. A comparative study on hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation with sequential or simultaneous integrated boost on different positions after breast-conserving surgery. Sci Rep 2021; 11:18017. [PMID: 34504253 PMCID: PMC8429685 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97520-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This study explored the dosimetric difference between hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HFWBI) with sequential boost (SEB) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) based on supine and prone positions to identify the superior boost mode and superior position. Thirty breast cancer patients eligible for HFWBI after breast-conserving surgery were enrolled. All patients underwent 3DCT simulation scanning in both supine and prone positions. For the SEB-HFWBI plan, the dose prescribed for the planning target volume (PTV) of whole breast (WB) was 2.67 Gy per fraction with a total of 15 fractions, followed by a sequential boost of 3.2 Gy per fraction to the PTV of tumor bed (TB) in 3 fractions. For the SIB-HFWBI plan, the dose prescribed for the PTV of WB was 2.67 Gy per fraction with a total of 15 fractions, with a simultaneously integrated boost of 3.2 Gy per fraction to the PTV of TB with a total of 15 fractions. Regardless of the position, for the PTV of TB, the conformal index (CI) in the SIB-HFWBI plans was greater than those in the SEB-HFWBI plans (T = − 8.114, − 8.114; both P < 0.05). The CI for the PTV of WB increased significantly in the prone position relative to the supine position in both two plans(Z = − 3.340, − 3.501; all P < 0.05). The study suggested that prone SIB-HFWBI might be more suitable for postoperative radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Yu
- Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute (Shandong Cancer Hospital), Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - Yankang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute (Shandong Cancer Hospital), Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - Tao Sun
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute (Shandong Cancer Hospital), Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Min Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute (Shandong Cancer Hospital), Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute (Shandong Cancer Hospital), Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - Qian Shao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute (Shandong Cancer Hospital), Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - Yingjie Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute (Shandong Cancer Hospital), Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - Jianbin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute (Shandong Cancer Hospital), Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China.
| | - Jinming Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute (Shandong Cancer Hospital), Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hörner-Rieber J, Forster T, Hommertgen A, Haefner MF, Arians N, König L, Harrabi SB, Schlampp I, Weykamp F, Lischalk JW, Heinrich V, Weidner N, Hüsing J, Sohn C, Heil J, Hof H, Krug D, Debus J. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) With Simultaneously Integrated Boost Shortens Treatment Time and Is Noninferior to Conventional Radiation Therapy Followed by Sequential Boost in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment: Results of a Large Randomized Phase III Trial (IMRT-MC2 Trial). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:1311-1324. [PMID: 33321192 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the modern era, improvements in radiation therapy techniques have paved the way for simultaneous integrated boost irradiation in adjuvant breast radiation therapy after breast conservation surgery. Nevertheless, randomized trials supporting the noninferiority of this treatment to historical standards of care approach are lacking. METHODS A prospective, multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial (NCT01322854) was performed to analyze noninferiority of conventional fractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost (IMRT-SIB) to 3-D conformal radiation therapy with sequential boost (3-D-CRT-seqB) for breast cancer patients. Primary outcomes were local control (LC) rates at 2 and 5 years (noninferiority margin at hazard ratio [HR] of 3.5) as well as cosmetic results 6 weeks and 2 years after radiation therapy (evaluated via photo documentation calculating the relative breast retraction assessment [pBRA] score [noninferiority margin of 1.25]). RESULTS A total of 502 patients were randomly assigned from 2011 to 2015. After a median follow-up of 5.1 years, the 2-year LC for the IMRT-SIB arm was noninferior to the 3-D-CRT-seqB arm (99.6% vs 99.6%, respectively; HR, 0.602; 95% CI, 0.123-2.452; P = .487). In addition, noninferiority was also shown for cosmesis after IMRT-SIB and 3-D-CRT-seqB at both 6 weeks (median pBRA, 9.1% vs 9.1%) and 2 years (median pBRA, 10.4% vs 9.8%) after radiation therapy (95% CI, -0.317 to 0.107 %; P = .332). Cosmetic assessment according to the Harvard scale by both the patient and the treating physician as well as late-toxicity evaluation with the late effects normal tissues- subjective, objective, management, analytic criteria, a score for the evaluation of long-term adverse effects in normal tissue, revealed no significant differences between treatment arms. In addition, there was no difference in overall survival rates (99.6% vs 99.6%; HR, 3.281; 95% CI: -0.748 to 22.585; P = .148) for IMRT-SIB and 3-D-CRT-seqB, respectively. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first prospective trial reporting the noninferiority of IMRT-SIB versus 3-D-CRT-seqB with respect to cosmesis and LC at 2 years of follow-up. This treatment regimen considerably shortens adjuvant radiation therapy times without compromising clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Adriane Hommertgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias F Haefner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nathalie Arians
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi B Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ingmar Schlampp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonathan W Lischalk
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, Lagone Medical Center, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Vanessa Heinrich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Nicola Weidner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Johannes Hüsing
- Division of Biostatistics, Coordination Centre for Clinical Trials, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof Sohn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörrg Heil
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Holger Hof
- Strahlentherapie Rhein-Pfalz, Neustadt, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, partner site Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Macchia G, Cilla S, Buwenge M, Zamagni A, Ammendolia I, Zamagni C, Frezza GP, Valentini V, Deodato F, Morganti AG. Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Concomitant Boost After Breast Conserving Surgery: A Phase I-II Trial. BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY 2020; 12:243-249. [PMID: 33209058 PMCID: PMC7670173 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s261587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose A concomitant boost (CB) in patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy after conservative surgery of invasive breast cancer (BC) has been suggested for treatment time reduction and therapy intensification. The aim of this analysis was to assess long-term tolerability of a CB in patients treated with postoperative intensity Modulated Accelerated RAdiotherapy (MARA). Patients and Methods In this phase I–II trial, 321 patients with intermediate-high risk BC (pT1-4 with at least one of the following characteristics: pre or perimenopausal status, pN2-3, positive or close margins) were enrolled. Patients were treated with forward-planned intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and CB. A total dose of 50 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) and 60 Gy (2.4 Gy/fraction) was prescribed to the whole breast and the tumor bed, respectively. The potential impact of hypertension, diabetes, smoking habit, alcohol consumption, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy on both skin and subcutaneous late toxicity-free survival (LTFS) was evaluated. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results Median follow-up was 52 months (range: 3–115). Regional node irradiation, adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy were prescribed to 29.3%, 65.4% and 81.0% of patients, respectively. Five-year G2 and G3 skin LTFS were 95.6% and 100.0%, respectively. Five-year G2 and G3 subcutaneous LTFS were 80.0% and 98.6%, respectively. Only diabetes showed a significant correlation with worse G3 subcutaneous LTFS (p: 0.024). Five-year loco-regional control, metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 98.0%, 91.8%, 89.7% and 96.3%, respectively. Conclusion IMRT combined with CB was associated with a low risk of > G2 late toxicities (0.0% and 1.4% for skin and subcutaneous tissue, respectively). The cumulative actuarial incidence of local recurrences was 2.0% despite the exclusion of low-risk patients. Our results suggest that CB is safe and effective in patients with intermediate-high risk BC. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03471741.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Macchia
- Radiotherapy Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine ‑ DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alice Zamagni
- Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine ‑ DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ilario Ammendolia
- Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine ‑ DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Claudio Zamagni
- Addarii Medical Oncology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia, Rome, Italy.,Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiotherapy Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine ‑ DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Freedman GM, Taunk NK. Hypofractionated Whole Breast Radiotherapy and Boost in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-020-00386-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
6
|
Lertbutsayanukul C, Pitak M, Ajchariyasongkram N, Rakkiet N, Seuree F, Prayongrat A. Long-term patient-rated cosmetic and satisfactory outcomes of early breast cancer treated with conventional versus hypofractionated breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost technique. Breast J 2020; 26:1946-1952. [PMID: 32648331 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
To compare patient-rated cosmetic and satisfactory outcomes between conventional fractionation with simultaneously integrated boost (C-SIB) vs hypofractionation with SIB (H-SIB) in early breast cancer. Patients with stage I and II breast cancer who received breast-conserving surgery followed by radiation with SIB to tumor bed and completed questionnaire were included in this study. Radiotherapy was as follows: C-SIB arm = 50 Gy and 65 Gy in 25 fractions and H-SIB arm = 43.2 Gy and 52.8 Gy in 16 fractions to the whole breast and tumor bed, respectively. Single cross-sectional assessment of the breast cosmesis was done by patients and radiation oncologist at a follow-up visit. Breast cosmetic and satisfaction scores were collected using a four-point Harvard/NSABP/RTOG cosmesis criteria scale and a four-point Likert-type scale, respectively. Of a total of 114 patients (C-SIB = 57) and (H-SIB = 57) arms, a median time from radiotherapy completion to questionnaire response was 7.2 years. Patient-rated cosmetic outcome in C-SIB vs H-SIB was "excellent" in 40.3% vs 45.6%, "good" in 33.3% vs 42.1%, "fair" in 21.1% vs 10.5%, and "poor" in 5.3% vs 1.8% (P = .288). Corresponding satisfaction was "very satisfied" in 52.6% vs 57.9%, "satisfied" in 40.4% vs 35.1%, "neutral" in 7.0% vs 5.2%, and "unsatisfied" in 0% vs 1.8% (P = .683). Stage I and older age at radiotherapy were predictors for favorable (good or excellent) cosmesis and satisfaction, respectively. In early-stage breast cancer, H-SIB provided a trend for better cosmesis than C-SIB while maintaining satisfaction. The reduction in treatment duration and cost as well as favorable cosmesis outcomes encourages the use of H-SIB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chawalit Lertbutsayanukul
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Manida Pitak
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Nichakon Rakkiet
- Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Farinda Seuree
- Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Anussara Prayongrat
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.,Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hypofractionated volumetric modulated arc therapy with SIB adjuvant to breast preservation surgery: retrospective experience from a Regional Cancer Centre in Eastern India. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2019. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396919000165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
AbstractBackground:The incidence of breast cancer has surpassed cervical cancer in India and it has now become the most common cancer in women. Multiple randomised studies have reported low α/β value in the range of 3–4 for breast cancer, which predict a potential radiobiological advantage for hypofractionated radiotherapy resulting in such schedules becoming standard in many centers with reduction in overall treatment time. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a novel technique of delivering radiotherapy that reduces treatment delivery time, requires less monitor units (MU) and offers good conformity. The mean dose to normal tissue may be minimised using this technique although there will be inferior sparing if we consider the low-dose volume such as V5, the effect of which is not quantifiable yet.Aim:Reporting acute toxicity, cosmetic effects, and quality of life in patients of early breast cancer treated with adjuvant hypofractionated VMAT with SIB.Material and Methods:The records of 44 patients registered at the hospital between August 2014 and December 2015 were included in this analysis. Acute toxicities were analysed using CTCAE v4.03. Cosmetic outcomes were assessed using Harvard scale, while quality of life outcomes were assessed using EORTC scales and Health Related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23).Results:No grade ≥2 skin toxicities were recorded. Breast pain was recorded as Grade 1 in 13·8% patients and Grade 1 fatigue in 18·2%. The maximum haematological abnormality grade recorded was Grade 1. Cosmesis was assessed at the baseline, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. A total of 88·6% of the patients had an Excellent or good cosmesis at the baseline, which was similar even at 6 months, at 88·7%, improved further at 1 year to 90·9%. At 6 months post radiotherapy, high functional scale QOL scores were noted.Conclusion:The technique is associated with minimum acute toxicity, good to excellent cosmesis and acceptable quality of life.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ippolito E, Rinaldi CG, Silipigni S, Greco C, Fiore M, Sicilia A, Trodella L, D’Angelillo RM, Ramella S. Hypofractionated radiotherapy with concomitant boost for breast cancer: a dose escalation study. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20180169. [PMID: 30433824 PMCID: PMC6541174 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2018] [Revised: 10/04/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
METHODS: Patients with breast cancer with pathological stage pT 1-2 and at least one risk factor for local recurrence such as N1 disease, lymphovascular invasion, extensive intraductal component, close margins, non-hormone sensitive disease, grading G3 were enrolled. Patients were treated with hypofractionated RT to whole breast with a dose of 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions. The dose was escalated to the tumour bed through a daily concomitant boost technique at three dose levels: 48 Gy (3.2 Gy/die), 50.25 Gy(3.35 Gy/die) and 52.5 Gy (3.5 Gy/die). Dose escalation to a higher step was carried out if all patients of the lower dose had completed the treatment without dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Skin toxicity, cosmetic evaluation and quality of life was evaluated at baseline, at treatment end and at 3 and 12 months after RT end. RESULTS: Three patients for each dose level were enrolled. No DLT occurred. The maximum toxicity collected during RT was G2 skin toxicity in 3 (33.3%) patients, one for each dose level. No G2 toxicity at 3 and 12 months was collected. At median follow up of 21.8 months (range: 13.5 - 40.9 months), no G2 late toxicity was recorded. CONCLUSION: The 3 week course of post-operative RT with dose escalation to the tumour bed to 52.5 Gy has been achieved without dose limiting toxicities and can be tested in Phase II trials. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: In our study, we tested the highest dose level to the tumour bed ever reported in studies using accelerated hypofractionation with concomitant boost in high risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edy Ippolito
- Radiotherapy Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Sonia Silipigni
- Radiotherapy Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Greco
- Radiotherapy Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Fiore
- Radiotherapy Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Lucio Trodella
- Radiotherapy Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Sara Ramella
- Radiotherapy Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Which simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique is dosimetrically superior in the treatment of breast cancer; volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or fixed field (ff) IMRT? JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2017. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396917000164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractBackground and purposeTo determine which concomitant boost technique is dosimetrically superior in the treatment of breast cancer; volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or fixed field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (ff-IMRT).Materials and methodsIn total, 30 breast patients were re-planned with both VMAT and fixed field concomitant boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques. A hybrid technique was used delivering 80% of the dose through tangential beams and 20% through an integrated boost. A two-tailed t-test sample for means was used to compare the dosimetric differences between the techniques.ResultsMaximum dose was statistically lower for VMAT; 103·2 versus 103·7% for ff-IMRT along with statistically lower V2 Gy doses to the contralateral lung (0·7 versus 1·6%) and heart for both left- (19·0%/22·6%), and right- (5·5%/8·8%) sided patients, respectively. ff-IMRT boasted significantly lower ipsilateral lung V20, V18 and V10 Gy (7·9/8·6/13·1 versus 8·1/8·8/13·4%) than VMAT, respectively. No differences were found with minimum coverage, mean dose and V5 Gy to all organs at risk (OARs).ConclusionVMAT and ff-IMRT techniques demonstrate excellent target coverage and OAR sparing facilitated by the hybrid planning technique and deep inspiration breath hold. There is no obvious dosimetrically superior option between the two techniques. Reduced treatment times with VMAT make it more desirable to implement clinically.
Collapse
|
10
|
Tsoutsou PG, Vozenin MC, Durham AD, Bourhis J. How could breast cancer molecular features contribute to locoregional treatment decision making? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016; 110:43-48. [PMID: 28109404 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2016] [Revised: 10/27/2016] [Accepted: 12/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Systemic treatments are tailored to breast cancer (BC) heterogeneity, which is not yet taken into account for radiotherapy (RT) personalization. The primary objective of this review is to summarize existing data suggesting BC subtypes and genetic assays are prognostic and predictive biomarkers useful for RT decision-making and to provide implications for their incorporation into future translational and clinical research. The evidence suggesting that BC subtypes also exhibit distinct "locoregional recurrence (LRR)" patterns is retrospective but consistent and validated in over fifteen studies. The HER-2 positive and triple negative subtypes are the most susceptible to locoregional failure. The high risk of the HER-2 positive subtype can be reversed with trastuzumab administration. Very little is known on the subtypes' intrinsic radiosensitivity properties. Genetic assays have assessed retrospectively signatures' prognostic and predictive value in patients' cohorts (several coming from prospective studies) for LRR risk and radiotherapy (RT) benefit. Further confirmation is needed before their introduction into clinical routine. Evidence on the use of molecular biomarkers for adjuvant RT tailoring is emerging but needs validation and introduction into prospective studies. The plethora of modern RT options (partial breast irradiation, hypofractionation), as well as recent evidence pointing towards more extensive radiotherapy, demand introduction of biological features into clinical trials to improve therapeutic decisions. Open questions, such as tailoring of irradiation after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in complete responders and the understanding of the interplay between local control, systemic recurrence and survival given modern systemic treatments, need to be addressed under the prism of biology within this heterogeneous disease. Intrinsic radiobiological properties within this heterogeneity need to be highlighted in order to further improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pelagia G Tsoutsou
- Hôpital Neuchâtelois, Radiation Oncology Department, Rue de Chasseral 20, 2300, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Division of Oncology, Radio-Oncology Department, Rue de Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland; Radio-Oncology Research Laboratory of the CHUV, Biopole III - 9A Rue de la Corniche, 1066, Epalinges, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Marie-Catherine Vozenin
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Division of Oncology, Radio-Oncology Department, Rue de Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland; Radio-Oncology Research Laboratory of the CHUV, Biopole III - 9A Rue de la Corniche, 1066, Epalinges, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - André-Dante Durham
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Division of Oncology, Radio-Oncology Department, Rue de Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland; Radio-Oncology Research Laboratory of the CHUV, Biopole III - 9A Rue de la Corniche, 1066, Epalinges, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Hôpital Neuchâtelois, Radiation Oncology Department, Rue de Chasseral 20, 2300, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Division of Oncology, Radio-Oncology Department, Rue de Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hypofractionated boost after whole breast irradiation in breast carcinoma: chronic toxicity results and cosmesis. Clin Transl Oncol 2016; 19:464-469. [PMID: 27655367 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-016-1548-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2016] [Accepted: 09/10/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of hypofractionated boost after hypofractionated whole breast irradiation in breast carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients after breast conservative surgery were treated all time with hypofractionation of 2.67 Gy/day. Whole breast dose was 40.05 Gy followed in case of risk of local relapse by a boost of 16.02 Gy or 8.01 Gy. Acute and chronic toxicity results were evaluated including cosmetic software-assisted assessment and objective evaluation of fibrosis parameters (elasticity and hydration) by means of a skin tester. RESULTS A total of 362 patients were evaluated. Acute toxicities comprised grade 1 dermatitis in 48.1 %, grade 2 in 44.5 % and grade 3 in 17 patients 4.7 %, respectively. After a median follow-up of 4.5 years, in 308 cases (86.6 %) there was no chronic skin or subcutaneous changes. In the first consecutive 50 patients, measures with skin tester showed no statistical differences in parameters for skin and subcutaneous fibrosis. Cosmetic results were considered excellent and good in 26 and 62 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Boost to tumour bed with hypofractionated doses is well tolerated and acute and chronic toxicities are mild with good cosmetic results. Objective systems are encouraging methods to assess skin quality and cosmesis.
Collapse
|
12
|
Hamilton DG, Bale R, Jones C, Fitzgerald E, Khor R, Knight K, Wasiak J. Impact of tumour bed boost integration on acute and late toxicity in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review. Breast 2016; 27:126-35. [PMID: 27113229 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2015] [Revised: 02/24/2016] [Accepted: 03/11/2016] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this systematic review was to summarise the evidence from studies investigating the integration of tumour bed boosts into whole breast irradiation for patients with Stage 0-III breast cancer, with a focus on its impact on acute and late toxicities. A comprehensive systematic electronic search through the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases from January 2000 to January 2015 was conducted. Studies were considered eligible if they investigated the efficacy of hypo- or normofractionated whole breast irradiation with the inclusion of a daily concurrent boost. The primary outcomes of interest were the degree of observed acute and late toxicity following radiotherapy treatment. Methodological quality assessment was performed on all included studies using either the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or a previously published investigator-derived quality instrument. The search identified 35 articles, of which 17 satisfied our eligibility criteria. Thirteen and eleven studies reported on acute and late toxicities respectively. Grade 3 acute skin toxicity ranged from 1 to 7% whilst moderate to severe fibrosis and telangiectasia were both limited to 9%. Reported toxicity profiles were comparable to historical data at similar time-points. Studies investigating the delivery of concurrent boosts with whole breast radiotherapy courses report safe short to medium-term toxicity profiles and cosmesis rates. Whilst the quality of evidence and length of follow-up supporting these findings is low, sufficient evidence has been generated to consider concurrent boost techniques as an alternative to conventional sequential techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel George Hamilton
- Epworth Radiation Oncology Research Centre, Epworth Richmond, 32 Erin St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia; Epworth Radiation Oncology, Epworth Richmond, 32 Erin St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia.
| | | | - Claire Jones
- Epworth Radiation Oncology, Epworth Richmond, 32 Erin St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
| | - Emma Fitzgerald
- Epworth Radiation Oncology, Epworth Richmond, 32 Erin St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
| | - Richard Khor
- Austin Health, Austin Hospital, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg VIC 3121, Australia
| | - Kellie Knight
- Department of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Jason Wasiak
- Epworth Radiation Oncology Research Centre, Epworth Richmond, 32 Erin St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Beck RE, Kim L, Yue NJ, Haffty BG, Khan AJ, Goyal S. Treatment techniques to reduce cardiac irradiation for breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy: a review. Front Oncol 2014; 4:327. [PMID: 25452938 PMCID: PMC4231838 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2014] [Accepted: 10/30/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Thousands of women diagnosed with breast cancer each year receive breast-conserving surgery followed by adjuvant radiation therapy. For women with left-sided breast cancer, there is risk of potential cardiotoxicity from the radiation therapy. As data have become available to quantify the risk of cardiotoxicity from radiation, strategies have also developed to reduce the dose of radiation to the heart without compromising radiation dose to the breast. Several broad categories of techniques to reduce cardiac radiation doses include breath hold techniques, prone positioning, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, and accelerated partial breast irradiation, as well as many small techniques to improve traditional three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. This review summarizes the published scientific literature on the various techniques to decrease cardiac irradiation in women treated to the left breast for breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert E Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey , New Brunswick, NJ , USA
| | - Leonard Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey , New Brunswick, NJ , USA
| | - Ning J Yue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey , New Brunswick, NJ , USA
| | - Bruce G Haffty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey , New Brunswick, NJ , USA
| | - Atif J Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey , New Brunswick, NJ , USA
| | - Sharad Goyal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey , New Brunswick, NJ , USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Comparison of Two Radiotherapeutic Hypofractionated Schedules in the Application of Tumor Bed Boost. Clin Breast Cancer 2013; 13:292-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2013.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2012] [Revised: 12/29/2012] [Accepted: 02/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
15
|
Freedman GM, White JR, Arthur DW, Allen Li X, Vicini FA. Accelerated fractionation with a concurrent boost for early stage breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2013; 106:15-20. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2012] [Revised: 11/25/2012] [Accepted: 12/06/2012] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
16
|
Riou O, Fenoglietto P, Lemanski C, Azria D. Radiothérapie conformationnelle avec modulation d’intensité dans les cancers du sein : intérêt, limitations, modalités techniques. Cancer Radiother 2012; 16:479-84. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2012.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2012] [Accepted: 05/20/2012] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|