1
|
Jacomina LE, Agas RAF, Benedicto MTJU, Vega GP, Paulino AC, Mejia MBA. Radiation Oncology Training in the Philippines: Bridging Gaps for Improved Cancer Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2300462. [PMID: 38723217 DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation oncology in the Philippines, a large lower- and middle-income country in Southeast Asia, is facing a critical shortage in manpower, with only 113 radiation oncologists (ROs) over 55 radiotherapy (RT) centers serving 100 million population. Paramount to workforce expansion is ensuring that training programs can produce adequately trained specialists. In this study, we describe the current state of radiation oncology training programs in the Philippines. METHODS This is a cross-sectional observational analysis of the nine radiation oncology residency training programs in the Philippines. Data were collected from a survey of the program directors, the Philippine Radiation Oncology Society database, and a PubMed literature search. RESULTS Eight of the nine programs are in the National Capital Region. Since program standardization in 2005, there have been 82 four-year residency graduates, with up to 18 new graduates annually. Faculty-to-trainee ratio ranges from 0.5 to 2.67. In terms of technology, all programs have intensity-modulated RT and high-dose-rate brachytherapy, but only six are equipped with computed tomography-based image guidance and stereotactic capabilities. Clinical education schemes vary per institution regarding curriculum implementation, resident activities, and methods of evaluation. Required resident case logs are not met for lung, GI, genitourinary, bone and soft tissue, and hematologic malignancies. In total, there are only 22 resident-led publications from 10 unique individuals in two training programs. CONCLUSION Program expansions are warranted to meet the projected demand for ROs in the Philippines, but training programs must first improve key aspects of staffing, technology, clinical education, and research. Addressing training challenges related to resource limitations necessitates local and international collaborations with higher-capacity centers to bridge gaps for continued quality improvement with the aim of ultimately delivering better overall cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisa E Jacomina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, Philippines
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ryan Anthony F Agas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, Philippines
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cardinal Santos Medical Center, San Juan City, Philippines
| | - Maria Teresa Julieta U Benedicto
- Section of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines
| | - Gaudencio P Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shiao JC, Gao D, Mueller A, Holt DE, Moskalenko M, Zaccone J, Waxweiler TV, Robin TP, Nath SK. Pilot Curriculum for Continued Professional Development of Radiation Oncology Nurses. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101372. [PMID: 38405320 PMCID: PMC10885544 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Limited structured educational programs are available for the continued professional development of radiation oncology nurses. In this study, we evaluated a pilot curriculum focusing on clinical workflow and toxicity management for radiation oncology nurses at a single university-affiliated medical center network. Methods and Materials Based on a previous multi-institutional needs assessment, a targeted curriculum on clinical workflow and toxicity management was developed, including didactic lectures, written disease-specific toxicity management guidelines, and standardized medication/laboratory order preference lists in the electronic health record. An anonymized survey was circulated to all participants pre- and postcurriculum. The survey was composed of Likert-type subjective questions and 11 objective knowledge-based questions (KBQs). Paired Likert-type data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Objective question data were compared with the McNamar's mid P test. Results Thirteen nurses participated in the pilot curriculum and 100% completed pre- and post curriculum surveys. After the didactics, nurses reported a significant increase in their understanding of the responsibilities of a nurse and overall process of care and their ability to explain computed tomography simulation, as well as their ability to assess, manage, and grade radiation-related toxicities (P < .01). There was significant improvement in the percent of correct answers on objective KBQs from a baseline of 52% to 80% after the curriculum (P < .01). Qualitatively, 70% (9/13) of nurses rated the curriculum as "extremely useful" and 30% (4/13) as "quite useful." Conclusions Our pilot curriculum using a combination of in-person formal didactics, toxicity management guidelines, and electronic health record based order preference lists was well-received and showed promising results on KBQ assessment. This work may be used to guide the development of larger curricula for nurse onboarding and continuing education in a multicenter setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay C. Shiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Dexiang Gao
- Department of Statistics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Adam Mueller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Jennifer Zaccone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Timothy V. Waxweiler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Tyler P. Robin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sameer K. Nath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yoshimatsu Y, Ohtake Y, Ukai M, Miyagami T, Morikawa T, Shimamura Y, Kataoka Y, Hashimoto T. "Diagnose, Treat, and SUPPORT". Clinical competencies in the management of older adults with aspiration pneumonia: a scoping review. Eur Geriatr Med 2024; 15:57-66. [PMID: 38060164 PMCID: PMC10876713 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-023-00898-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aspiration pneumonia in older adults is increasingly common, with a high care burden and morbidity. However, clinical competencies in its management have not been developed, and healthcare professionals struggle on how to care for these patients with multimodal treatment needs. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review to investigate what is known about the desired clinical competencies for the management of older adults with aspiration pneumonia, to utilise in clinical practice, education, and future research. METHODS First, we defined aspiration pneumonia according to a preliminary search. We then searched the literature on MEDLINE and CINAHL, focusing on studies involving patients aged 65 years old and older diagnosed with aspiration pneumonia. All settings were included, with the exception of intensive care units. Publication dates were limited to January 2011 to July 2022 and languages to English and Japanese. The extracted data were used to refine the preliminary competency framework developed by the Japan Aspiration pneumonia inter-Professional team Educational Program (JAPEP) in preparation of this study. RESULTS Ninety-nine studies were included. Following data extraction from these studies, 3 competencies were renamed, and 3 new competencies were added, to create a list of 12 competencies. These were Diagnosis, Treatment, Swallow Assessment, Underlying condition management, Nutrition, Oral management, Rehabilitation, Multidisciplinary team, Decision making, Prevention, Prognosis, and Palliative care. CONCLUSIONS Our scoping review identified 12 clinical competencies required in the management of older adults with aspiration pneumonia, outlined in the phrase 'Diagnose, Treat and SUPPORT'. We encourage healthcare professionals to share these competencies as a team to identify areas of unmet need and improve their patient care, with an emphasis on supportive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Yoshimatsu
- Elderly Care, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, Stadium Rd, London, SE18 4QH, UK.
- Centre for Exercise Activity and Rehabilitation, School of Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK.
- Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan.
| | - Yoichi Ohtake
- Department of Internal Medicine, Imai Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Mamiko Ukai
- Department of Family Medicine, Kameda Family Clinic, Tateyama, Japan
- Department of Health Data Science, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Taiju Miyagami
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Medicine, Juntendo University, Bunkyo City, Japan
| | - Toru Morikawa
- Department of General Medicine, Nara City Hospital, 1-50-1, Higashikideracho, Nara, 630-8305, Japan
| | - Yoshinosuke Shimamura
- Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan
- Department of Nephrology, Teine Keijinkai Medical Center, 1-40, Maeda 1-12, Teine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8555, Japan
| | - Yuki Kataoka
- Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyoto Min-Iren Asukai Hospital, Tanaka Asukai-cho 89, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8226, Japan
- Section of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine/Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan
| | - Tadayuki Hashimoto
- Department of General Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moskalenko M, Zaccone J, Fiscelli CA, Wieworka J, Anderson R, Choflet A, Martens S, Goodman KA, Golden DW, Nath SK. Assessment of Radiation Oncology Nurse Education in the United States. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:667-671. [PMID: 33524544 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Nurses in the radiation oncology (RO) clinic have a critical role in the management of patients receiving radiation therapy. However, limited data exist regarding the exposure of nurses to RO during training and the current educational needs of practicing RO nurses. This study assesses nurses' prior RO education, participation in national training efforts, and perceived educational needs. METHODS AND MATERIALS A web-based survey using a 5-point Likert-type scale was distributed to RO nurses at 3 academic medical centers. Questions focused on prior education experiences, clinical areas of strength/weakness, and perceived value of future educational interventions. Likert-type scores are reported as median (interquartile range), and a Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to assess for significant differences in responses. RESULTS The survey response rate was 39 of 54 (72%). Respondents were 90% female and trained at 30 nursing schools in 17 states. Only 5% of nurses reported a curriculum in nursing school with RO content, and nearly all (97%) received their RO education on the job. Forty-one percent of nurses completed the Oncology Nursing Society radiation therapy certificate course, and only 5% completed the American Society for Radiation Oncology nursing module. Nurses felt most confident in the overall management of patients with breast (4 [3-4]), prostate (4 [3-5]), and central nervous system (4 [3-4]) cancers and least confident for lymphoma (3 [2-4]), gynecologic (3 [2-4]), and head and neck cancers (3 [2-4]; P < .01). Nurses rated didactic lectures from physicians (5 [3-5]), shadowing RO residents (4 [3-5]), and working with simulation therapists (4 [3-5]) as valuable components to include in a training curriculum (P = .08). CONCLUSIONS Nursing school exposure to RO is limited, and only a minority of RO nurses complete RO-specific training or certification available from national organizations. This study identifies several areas of perceived clinical nursing strengths and weaknesses that can be used to inform the design of future RO nursing educational programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Moskalenko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jennifer Zaccone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Cheryl A Fiscelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jennifer Wieworka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Roberta Anderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Amanda Choflet
- School of Nursing, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
| | - Shanel Martens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Daniel W Golden
- Department of Radiation Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sameer K Nath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Khader J, Al-Mousa A, Al Khatib S, Wadi-Ramahi S. Successful Development of a Competency-Based Residency Training Program in Radiation Oncology: Our 15-Year Experience from Within a Developing Country. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2020; 35:1011-1016. [PMID: 31154636 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-01557-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
One of the main challenges of delivering high quality of care to cancer patients in developing countries is the lack of well-trained radiation oncologists. This is a direct cause for the lack of residency programs coupled with lack of resources. This article describes and details establishments of a successful and sustainable radiation-oncology residency program in our country. The program has been in operation for 14 years and has trained and graduated radiation oncologists who are now working in various countries. The curriculum of the 4-year residency program, fashioned according to American College of Radiologists (ACR) recommendations, includes site-specific clinical rotations and didactic lectures in clinical oncology, radiobiology, medical physics, statistics, and epidemiology. It also includes a component of advanced clinical experience in the form of 3-month externship at one of collaborating centers outside the country. Evaluation of the residents is conducted annually via written exams and 360° feedback. Residents also sit for the formal certification exam in radiation oncology from the national Medical Council. The exam consists of 2 written exams and one oral. As a form of benchmarking residents' knowledge, they are required to sit for the ACR examinations held annually and conducted in Amman in tandem. The program has successfully trained and graduated 28 residents, who now work as consultant radiation oncologists locally and abroad. Each resident has gone through a structured training that includes exposure to a Western-style patient-management culture, enhancing the breadth and width of their clinical experience. The residency program, initiated in a developing country, underwent many challenges, yet it overcome all obstacles and resulted in a successful training of competent radiation oncologists serving the region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamal Khader
- Radiation Oncology Department, King Hussein Cancer Center, P.O. Box 1269, Al-Jubeiha, Amman, 11941, Jordan.
| | - Abdelatif Al-Mousa
- Radiation Oncology Department, King Hussein Cancer Center, P.O. Box 1269, Al-Jubeiha, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Sondos Al Khatib
- Radiation Oncology Department, King Hussein Cancer Center, P.O. Box 1269, Al-Jubeiha, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Shada Wadi-Ramahi
- Biomedical Physics Department, MBC#03, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, PO Box 3354, Riyadh, 11211, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Arculeo S, Miglietta E, Nava F, Morra A, Leonardi MC, Comi S, Ciardo D, Fiore MS, Gerardi MA, Pepa M, Gugliandolo SG, Livi L, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Dicuonzo S. The emerging role of radiation therapists in the contouring of organs at risk in radiotherapy: analysis of inter-observer variability with radiation oncologists for the chest and upper abdomen. Ecancermedicalscience 2020; 14:996. [PMID: 32153651 PMCID: PMC7032938 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims To compare the contouring of organs at risk (OAR) between a clinical specialist radiation therapist (CSRT) and radiation oncologists (ROs) with different levels of expertise (senior–SRO, junior–JRO, fellow–FRO). Methods On ten planning computed tomography (CT) image sets of patients undergoing breast radiotherapy (RT), the observers independently contoured the contralateral breast, heart, left anterior descending artery (LAD), oesophagus, kidney, liver, spinal cord, stomach and trachea. The CSRT was instructed by the JRO e SRO. The inter-observer variability of contoured volumes was measured using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) (threshold of ≥ 0.7 for good concordance) and the centre of mass distance (CMD). The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed and a p-value < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. Results Good overlaps (DSC > 0.7) were obtained for all OARs, except for LAD (DSC = 0.34 ± 0.17, mean ± standard deviation) and oesophagus (DSC = 0.66 ± 0.06, mean ± SD). The mean CMD < 1 cm was achieved for all the OARs, but spinal cord (CMD = 1.22 cm). By pairing the observers, mean DSC > 0.7 and mean CMD < 1 cm were achieved in all cases. The best overlaps were seen for the pairs JRO-CSRT(DSC = 0.82; CMD = 0.49 cm) and SRO-JRO (DSC = 0.80; CMD = 0.51 cm). Conclusions Overall, good concordance was found for all the observers. Despite the short training in contouring, CSRT obtained good concordance with his tutor (JRO). Great variability was seen in contouring the LAD, due to its difficult visualization and identification of CT scans without contrast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Arculeo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Eleonora Miglietta
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Nava
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Morra
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Leonardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Comi
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Delia Ciardo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Sarra Fiore
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Marianna Alessandra Gerardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Pepa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Giovanni Gugliandolo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Piero Palagi 1, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ryan J, Willis D. Paediatric image-guided radiation therapy: determining and evaluating appropriate kilovoltage planar exposure factors for the Varian on-board imager. J Med Radiat Sci 2020; 67:16-24. [PMID: 31478607 PMCID: PMC7063249 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Revised: 05/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Kilovoltage (kV) orthogonal imaging is commonly used for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) in paediatrics. Paediatrics have an increased sensitivity to radiation. Exposure factors need to be optimised so that imaging dose is kept as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). METHODS A table of low-dose IGRT radiographic exposure factors for paediatric IGRT was determined through a phantom study. Four anatomical sites, head and neck, thorax, abdomen and pelvis, were investigated. The table was evaluated against standard manufacturer pre-sets. Dose was evaluated in terms of system-reported entrance surface air kerma (ESAK). Qualified participants volunteered to perform offline image matching in a further phantom study, recording misalignments detected and providing subjective assessments of image quality using an electronic survey tool. A statistical comparison of matching accuracy was conducted. RESULTS Twelve radiation therapists or radiation oncologists completed the image matching task and survey. The low-dose exposure table reduced imaging dose by 20-94% compared to manufacturer pre-sets. No significant difference was observed in the accuracy of image matching (head and neck P = 0.82, thorax P = 0.15, abdomen P = 0.33, pelvis P = 0.59). Participant image exposure preference was largely equivocal. CONCLUSIONS Optimising radiographic exposures in paediatric IGRT is feasible, logical and therefore reasonably achievable. Implementation of the low-dose exposure table presented in this study should be considered by paediatric radiotherapy departments wishing to image gently without compromising the potential to detect set up errors. Further study using a contrast detail phantom and contrast to noise image analysis software is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Ryan
- School of Health and Biomedical SciencesRMIT UniversityBundooraVictoriaAustralia
| | - David Willis
- Radiation Therapy DepartmentSunshine Coast University HospitalBirtinyaQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Couto J, McFadden S, McClure P, Bezzina P, Hughes C. Competencies of therapeutic radiographers working in the linear accelerator across Europe: A systematic search of the literature and thematic analysis. Radiography (Lond) 2020; 26:82-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2019.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
9
|
Lievens Y, Ricardi U, Poortmans P, Verellen D, Gasparotto C, Verfaillie C, Cortese AJ. Radiation Oncology. Optimal Health for All, Together. ESTRO vision, 2030. Radiother Oncol 2019; 136:86-97. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2019] [Revised: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
10
|
Esplen MJ, Hunter J, Maheu C, Rosberger Z, Wong J, McGillicuddy P, Secord S, Blacker S, Green E, Toner B, Li J, Dobson K. de Souza interprofessional practice cancer competency framework. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:797-808. [PMID: 31152301 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04823-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE As the demand in cancer care continues to increase, health systems require a workforce of highly educated specialists and generalists to provide continuity of care across settings. OBJECTIVES Led by de Souza Institute in Canada, an interdisciplinary working group was formed to develop a competency framework with relevance across regulated health professionals involved in cancer care. METHODS The working group was presented with results from a scoping review of national and international guidelines, standards, and competencies in oncology, as well as data from needs assessments on continuing education opportunities and oncology topics most relevant to clinicians. Fifty-one professionals from, e.g., family medicine, pharmacy, social work, psychology, occupational therapy, and nursing participated in seven focus groups. An additional 32 nurses participated in a nursing-specific needs assessment survey. Using modified Delphi technique, working group members conducted three iterative rounds to review data and built consensus on competency items in relation to three levels of expertise, from early learner/novice practitioner, advancing practitioner, to expert practitioner. RESULTS A final consensus was reached for the selection of competencies that reflect optimal cancer care mapped into three levels of expertise, as well as knowledge, skills, and attitudes expected of each level. Examples for the competency for early learner/novice practitioner include the following: Have awareness of common ethical issues in cancer care (knowledge); demonstrate ability to discuss, educate, and counsel patients and their support persons(s) regarding preferences (skills); and appreciate the impact of culture, the sensitivity, and diversity of attitudes in relation to cancer (attitude). Expert practitioner examples include: recognition of need for, and ability to advocate for challenges involving equity and access in order to improve health outcomes (skill) and awareness of workplace complexities, such as provider roles, team functioning, and organizational environments affecting patient-practitioner relationships (attitude). CONCLUSION The de Souza Interprofessional practice cancer competency framework provides a set of shared competencies and a novice to expert pathway for clinicians across disciplines and supports a more standardized learning and comprehensive approach in organizing professional development towards a coordinated, high quality, and person-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Jane Esplen
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. .,Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada. .,de Souza Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Jonathan Hunter
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Christine Maheu
- Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Zeev Rosberger
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montréal, Canada.,Departments of Psychology, Oncology & Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Jiahui Wong
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, de Souza Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Patti McGillicuddy
- School of Social Work, University of Toronto, Centre for IPE, Toronto, Canada
| | - Scott Secord
- Community Addiction and Mental Health Services of Haldimand and Norfolk (CAMHS), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Blacker
- Cancer and Palliative Program Planning and Performance, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Esther Green
- Nursing and Psychosocial Oncology Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| | - Brenda Toner
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jane Li
- de Souza Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pathmanathan AU, McNair HA, Schmidt MA, Brand DH, Delacroix L, Eccles CL, Gordon A, Herbert T, van As NJ, Huddart RA, Tree AC. Comparison of prostate delineation on multimodality imaging for MR-guided radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20180948. [PMID: 30676772 PMCID: PMC6540870 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Revised: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: With increasing incorporation of MRI in radiotherapy, we investigate two MRI sequences for prostate delineation in radiographer-led image guidance. METHODS: Five therapeutic radiographers contoured the prostate individually on CT, T2 weighted (T2W) and T2* weighted (T2*W) imaging for 10 patients. Contours were analysed with Monaco ADMIRE (research v. 2.0) to assess interobserver variability and accuracy by comparison with a gold standard clinician contour. Observers recorded time taken for contouring and scored image quality and confidence in contouring. RESULTS: There is good agreement when comparing radiographer contours to the gold-standard for all three imaging types with Dice similarity co-efficient 0.91-0.94, Cohen's κ 0.85-0.91, Hausdorff distance 4.6-7.6 mm and mean distance between contours 0.9-1.2 mm. In addition, there is good concordance between radiographers across all imaging modalities. Both T2W and T2*W MRI show reduced interobserver variability and improved accuracy compared to CT, this was statistically significant for T2*W imaging compared to CT across all four comparison metrics. Comparing MRI sequences reveals significantly reduced interobserver variability and significantly improved accuracy on T2*W compared to T2W MRI for DSC and Cohen's κ. Both MRI sequences scored significantly higher compared to CT for image quality and confidence in contouring, particularly T2*W. This was also reflected in the shorter time for contouring, measuring 15.4, 9.6 and 9.8 min for CT, T2W and T2*W MRI respectively. Conclusion: Therapeutic radiographer prostate contours are more accurate, show less interobserver variability and are more confidently and quickly outlined on MRI compared to CT, particularly using T2*W MRI. Advances in knowledge: Our work is relevant for MRI sequence choice and development of the roles of the interprofessional team in the advancement of MRI-guided radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helen A McNair
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Louise Delacroix
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alexandra Gordon
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Trina Herbert
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Faivre JC, Bibault JE, Leroy T, Agopiantz M, Salleron J, Wack M, Janoray G, Roché H, Culine S, Rivera S. Evaluation of the Theoretical Teaching of Postgraduate Radiation Oncology Medical Residents in France: a Cross-Sectional Study. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2018; 33:383-390. [PMID: 28138918 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1170-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
This study's purpose was to have residents evaluate Radiation Oncology (RO) theoretical teaching practices in France. An anonymous electronically cross-functional survey on theoretical teaching practices in the RO residents was conducted by (i) collecting data from residents in the medical faculties in France, (ii) comparing the data across practices when possible and (iii) suggesting means of improvement. A total of 103 out of 140 RO residents responded to the survey (73.5% response rate). National, inter-university, university and internships courses do not exist in 0% (0), 16.5% (17), 53.4% (55) and 40.8% (42) of residents, respectively. Residents need additional training due to the shortage of specialised postgraduate degree training (49.5% (51)), CV enhancement to obtain a post-internship position (49.5% (51)) or as part of a career plan (47.6% (49)). The topics covered in teaching to be improved were the following: basic concept 61.2% (63), advanced concept 61.2 (63) and discussion of frequent clinical cases 50.5% (52). The topics not covered in teaching to be improved were the following: the development of career (66.0% (68)), medical English (56.3% (58)), the organisation of RO speciality (49.5% (51)) and the hospital management of RO department (38.8% (40)). This is the first national assessment of theoretical teaching of RO residents in France.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Christophe Faivre
- French National Joint Union of Residents (ISNI), Paris, France.
- French Society of Young Radiation Oncologists (SFjRO), Paris, France.
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Département Universitaire de Radiothérapie, 6, avenue de Bourgogne CS 30519, 54511, Vandoeuvre-lès-nancy cedex, France.
| | - Jean-Emmanuel Bibault
- French Society of Young Radiation Oncologists (SFjRO), Paris, France
- Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Leroy
- French Society of Young Radiation Oncologists (SFjRO), Paris, France
- Academic Radiation Oncology Department, Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, Lille, France
| | - Mikaël Agopiantz
- French National Joint Union of Residents (ISNI), Paris, France
- Department of Endocrinology and Medical Gynaecology, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Julia Salleron
- Biostatistics Department, Lorraine Institute of Cancerology - Alexis-Vautrin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Maxime Wack
- Department of Biostatistics, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Guillaume Janoray
- French Society of Young Radiation Oncologists (SFjRO), Paris, France
- S. Kaplan Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Henri Roché
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Stéphane Culine
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Paris (Saint-Louis Hospital), Paris, France
- French National College of Teachers of Cancer (CNEC), Paris, France
| | - Sofia Rivera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) Education Committee, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Eriksen JG, Leech M, Benstead K, Verfaillie C. Perspectives on medical education in radiation oncology and the role of the ESTRO School. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2016; 1:15-18. [PMID: 29657989 PMCID: PMC5893479 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2016.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Revised: 10/18/2016] [Accepted: 10/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation oncology is a medical specialty not just delivering ionizing radiation to cancer patients but also participating as an important partner in the care of the patient from diagnosis to cure, follow up or end of life. The specialty is rapidly evolving in a multi- and interdisciplinary setting as multimodality treatment is becoming frequent. This requires that the medical undergraduate and postgraduate training evolve to these changes. The ESTRO School has for more than 30 years offered postgraduate training courses in and outside Europe and strives to develop its services to accommodate the educational needs of a specialty in constant development. Some of these developments are described in the present paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michelle Leech
- Discipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Kim Benstead
- Department of Oncology, Gloucestershire Oncology Centre, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee G, Dinniwell R, Liu FF, Fyles A, Han K, Conrad T, Levin W, Marshall A, Purdie TG, Koch CA. Building a New Model of Care for Rapid Breast Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation of the Advanced Practice Radiation Therapist in Cavity Delineation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2016; 28:e184-e191. [PMID: 27542573 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2016] [Revised: 06/22/2016] [Accepted: 06/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Breast radiotherapy treatment is commonly managed by a multidisciplinary team to ensure optimal delivery of care. We sought a new model of care whereby a clinical specialist radiation therapist (CSRT) delineates the cavity target for whole breast radiotherapy treatment planning and the radiation oncologist validates the contour during final plan review. This study evaluated the radiation oncologist's acceptance of these contours and identified characteristics of cavities suitable for CSRT-directed contouring. MATERIALS AND METHODS Following specialised breast oncology education and training by the radiation oncologist, the CSRT prospectively delineated cavities in 30 tangential breast radiotherapy cases and consulted the radiation oncologist in 'complex' cases but directed 'non-complex' cases for treatment planning. Changes to CSRT contours were evaluated using the conformity index. Breast density, time since surgery and cavity location, size and visualisation score [CVS: range 1 (no visible cavity) to 5 (homogenous cavity)] were captured. RESULTS Of the 30 CSRT delineated cavities contours, the CSRT directed 20 (66.7%) cases for planning without radiation oncology review; 19 were accepted (without changes) by the radiation oncologist upon final plan review and one was changed by the radiation oncologist (conformity index = 0.93) for boost treatment and did not affect the tangential treatment plan. Ten (33.3%) cases, all CVS ≤ 3, were reviewed with the radiation oncologist before planning (conformity index = 0.88 ± 0.12). CVS was inversely correlated with breast density and cavity size (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The CSRT delineated cavities appropriate for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning in women with well-visualised cavities, whereas 'complex' cases with dense breast parenchyma, CVS ≤ 3, and/or cases needing boost radiotherapy treatment required review with the radiation oncologist before planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Lee
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - R Dinniwell
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - F F Liu
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Fyles
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - K Han
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - T Conrad
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - W Levin
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Marshall
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - T G Purdie
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - C A Koch
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Krug D, Baumann R, Rieckmann T, Fokas E, Gauer T, Niyazi M. Situation of young radiation oncologists, medical physicists and radiation biologists in German-speaking countries : Results from a web-based survey of the Young DEGRO working group. Strahlenther Onkol 2016; 192:507-15. [PMID: 27343188 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-016-1003-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2015] [Accepted: 05/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The working group "Young DEGRO" (yDEGRO) was established in 2014 by the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO). We aimed to assess the current situation of young radiation oncologists, medical physicists and radiation biologists. METHODS An online survey that included 52 questions or statements was designed to evaluate topics related to training, clinical duties and research opportunities. Using the electronic mailing list of the DEGRO and contact persons at university hospitals in Germany as well as at four hospitals in Switzerland and Austria, young professionals employed in the field of radiation oncology were invited to participate in the survey. RESULTS A total of 260 responses were eligible for analysis. Of the respondents 69 % had a professional background in medicine, 23 % in medical physics and 9 % in radiation biology. Median age was 33 years. There was a strong interest in research among the participants; however a clear separation between research, teaching and routine clinical duties was rarely present for radiation oncologists and medical physicists. Likewise, allocated time for research and teaching during regular working hours was often not available. For radiation biologists, a lack of training in clinical and translational research was stated. CONCLUSION This survey details the current state of education and research opportunities in young radiation oncologists, medical physicists and radiation biologists. These results will form the basis for the future working program of the yDEGRO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Rene Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Rieckmann
- Laboratory for Radiobiology and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.,Department of Oncology, CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford, UK
| | - Tobias Gauer
- Department for Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Taylor RM, Feltbower RG, Aslam N, Raine R, Whelan JS, Gibson F. Modified international e-Delphi survey to define healthcare professional competencies for working with teenagers and young adults with cancer. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e011361. [PMID: 27142859 PMCID: PMC4861123 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To provide international consensus on the competencies required by healthcare professionals in order to provide specialist care for teenagers and young adults (TYA) with cancer. DESIGN Modified e-Delphi survey. SETTING International, multicentre study. PARTICIPANTS Experts were defined as professionals having worked in TYA cancer care for more than 12 months. They were identified through publications and professional organisations. METHODS Round 1, developed from a previous qualitative study, included 87 closed-ended questions with responses on a nine-point Likert scale and further open-ended responses to identify other skills, knowledge and attitudes. Round 2 contained only items with no consensus in round 1 and suggestions of additional items of competency. Consensus was defined as a median score ranging from 7 to 9 and strength of agreement using mean absolute deviation of the median. RESULTS A total of 179 registered to be members of the expert panel; valid responses were available from 158 (88%) in round 1 and 136/158 (86%) in round 2. The majority of participants were nurses (35%) or doctors (39%) from Europe (55%) or North America (35%). All 87 items in round 1 reached consensus with an additional 15 items identified for round 2, which also reached consensus. The strength of agreement was mostly high for statements. The areas of competence rated most important were agreed to be: 'Identify the impact of disease on young people's life' (skill), 'Know about side effects of treatment and how this might be different to those experienced by children or older adults' (knowledge), 'Honesty' (attitude) and 'Listen to young people's concerns' (aspect of communication). CONCLUSIONS Given the high degree of consensus, this list of competencies should influence education curriculum, professional development and inform workforce planning. Variation in strength of agreement for some competencies between professional groups should be explored further in pursuit of effective multidisciplinary team working.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Taylor
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - Richard G Feltbower
- Division of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Natasha Aslam
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rosalind Raine
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jeremy S Whelan
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Faith Gibson
- School of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Establishing a Global Radiation Oncology Collaboration in Education (GRaCE): Objectives and priorities. Radiother Oncol 2015; 117:188-92. [PMID: 26381531 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2015] [Accepted: 09/05/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Representatives from countries and regions world-wide who have implemented modern competency-based radiation- or clinical oncology curricula for training medical specialists, met to determine the feasibility and value of an ongoing international collaboration. In this forum, educational leaders from the ESTRO School, encompassing many European countries adopting the ESTRO Core Curriculum, and clinician educators from Canada, Denmark, the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand considered the training and educational arrangements within their jurisdictions, identifying similarities and challenges between programs. Common areas of educational interest and need were defined, which included development of new competency statements and assessment tools, and the application of the latter. The group concluded that such an international cooperation, which might expand to include others with similar goals, would provide a valuable vehicle to ensure training program currency, through sharing of resources and expertise, and enhance high quality radiation oncology education. Potential projects for the Global Radiation Oncology Collaboration in Education (GRaCE) were agreed upon, as was a strategy designed to maintain momentum. This paper describes the rationale for establishing this collaboration, presents a comparative view of training in the jurisdictions represented, and reports early goals and priorities.
Collapse
|
18
|
Malicki J. Medical physics in radiotherapy: The importance of preserving clinical responsibilities and expanding the profession's role in research, education, and quality control. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2015; 20:161-9. [PMID: 25949219 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2014] [Revised: 11/12/2014] [Accepted: 01/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Medical physicists have long had an integral role in radiotherapy. In recent decades, medical physicists have slowly but surely stepped back from direct clinical responsibilities in planning radiotherapy treatments while medical dosimetrists have assumed more responsibility. In this article, I argue against this gradual withdrawal from routine therapy planning. It is essential that physicists be involved, at least to some extent, in treatment planning and clinical dosimetry for each and every patient; otherwise, physicists can no longer be considered clinical specialists. More importantly, this withdrawal could negatively impact treatment quality and patient safety. Medical physicists must have a sound understanding of human anatomy and physiology in order to be competent partners to radiation oncologists. In addition, they must possess a thorough knowledge of the physics of radiation as it interacts with body tissues, and also understand the limitations of the algorithms used in radiotherapy. Medical physicists should also take the lead in evaluating emerging challenges in quality and safety of radiotherapy. In this sense, the input of physicists in clinical audits and risk assessment is crucial. The way forward is to proactively take the necessary steps to maintain and advance our important role in clinical medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Malicki
- University of Medical Sciences, Electroradiology Department, Garbary 15, 61-866 Poznan, Poland ; Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Medical Physics Department, Garbary 15, 61-866 Poznan, Poland ; Adam Mickiewicz University, Medical Physics Department, Umultowska 85, 61-614 Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Brown DW, Shulman A, Hudson A, Smith W, Fisher B, Hollon J, Pipman Y, Van Dyk J, Einck J. A framework for the implementation of new radiation therapy technologies and treatment techniques in low-income countries. Phys Med 2014; 30:791-8. [PMID: 25096162 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2014] [Revised: 06/26/2014] [Accepted: 07/13/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
We present a practical, generic, easy-to-use framework for the implementation of new radiation therapy technologies and treatment techniques in low-income countries. The framework is intended to standardize the implementation process, reduce the effort involved in generating an implementation strategy, and provide improved patient safety by reducing the likelihood that steps are missed during the implementation process. The 10 steps in the framework provide a practical approach to implementation. The steps are, 1) Site and resource assessment, 2) Evaluation of equipment and funding, 3) Establishing timelines, 4) Defining the treatment process, 5) Equipment commissioning, 6) Training and competency assessment, 7) Prospective risk analysis, 8) System testing, 9) External dosimetric audit and incident learning, and 10) Support and follow-up. For each step, practical advice for completing the step is provided, as well as links to helpful supplementary material. An associated checklist is provided that can be used to track progress through the steps in the framework. While the emphasis of this paper is on addressing the needs of low-income countries, the concepts also apply in high-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek W Brown
- University of Calgary, Depts of Oncology and Physics and Astronomy, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | | | | | - Wendy Smith
- University of Calgary, Depts of Oncology and Physics and Astronomy, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | | | - Jon Hollon
- Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
| | - Yakov Pipman
- International Educational Activities Committee, American Association of Physicists in Medicine, USA.
| | - Jacob Van Dyk
- Dept of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
| | - John Einck
- Dept of Oncology, Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Macià M, Rubio C, Romero J, Hervas A, Vera A, Britton R, Zunino S, Solé J, de la Torre M, Fernández A, Trigo L, Rodrigues R, Salgado ML. In response to ESTRO 2012 strategy meeting: vision for Radiation Oncology (published April 2012). Radiother Oncol 2013; 109:181-2. [PMID: 24060172 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2012] [Accepted: 08/30/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Miquel Macià
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jereczek-Fossa B, Pobbiati C, Santoro L, Fodor C, Fanti P, Vigorito S, Baroni G, Zerini D, De Cobelli O, Orecchia R. Prostate positioning using cone-beam computer tomography based on manual soft-tissue registration. Strahlenther Onkol 2013; 190:81-7. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-013-0387-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2012] [Accepted: 05/22/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
22
|
Reinfuss M, Byrski E, Malicki J. Radiotherapy facilities, equipment, and staffing in Poland: 2005-2011. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2013; 18:159-72. [PMID: 24416548 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2013.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2012] [Accepted: 01/21/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To evaluate the current status of radiotherapy facilities, staffing, and equipment, treatment and patients in Poland for the years 2005-2011 following implementation of the National Cancer Programme. METHODS A survey was sent to the radiotherapy centres in Poland to collect data on available equipment, staffing, and treatments in the years 2005-2011. RESULTS In 2011, 76,000 patients were treated with radiotherapy at 32 centres vs. 63,000 patients at 23 centres in 2005. Number of patients increased by 21%. In 2011, there were 453 radiation oncologists - specialists (1 in 168 patients), 325 medical physicists (1 in 215 patients), and 883 radiotherapy technicians (1 in 86 patients) vs. 320, 188, and 652, respectively, in 2005. The number of linear accelerators increased by 60%, from 70 units in 2005 to 112 in 2011. The current linac/patient ratio in Poland is 1 linac per 678 patients. Waiting times from diagnosis to the start of treatment has decreased. CONCLUSION Compared to 2005, there are more treatment facilities, more and better equipment (linacs), and more cancer care specialists. There are still large differences between the 16 Polish provinces in terms of equipment availability and ease of access to treatment. However, radiotherapy services in Poland have improved dramatically since the year 2005.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marian Reinfuss
- Center of Oncology - Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Krakow, Poland
| | - Edward Byrski
- Center of Oncology - Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Krakow, Poland
| | - Julian Malicki
- Medical Physics Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poland ; Electroradiology Department, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland ; Medical Physics Department, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Navarro A, Cacicedo J. The next generation of radiation oncologists: Challenges and perspectives. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2012; 17:243-5. [PMID: 24669301 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Arturo Navarro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Gran vía s/n, Km 2,7, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Cacicedo
- Cruces University Hospital, Radiation Oncology Department, Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Filippi AR, Alongi F, Ciammella P, De Bari B, Franco P, Livi L. A strategy for young members within national radiation oncology societies: the Italian experience (AIRO Giovani group). Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2012; 17:259-61. [PMID: 24669305 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2011] [Revised: 05/23/2012] [Accepted: 07/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To briefly review history, structure, past events and future projects of AIRO (Associazione Italiana Radioterapia Oncologica) young group (AIRO Giovani), focusing on its specific commitment to multidisciplnary networking among junior clinical oncologists at a national and international level. BACKGROUND AIRO Giovani is a part of AIRO composed by members under 40 years old. Its main activities are scientific and educational meetings dedicated to young Italian radiation oncologists and collaborative research projects. MATERIALS AND METHODS AIRO Giovani structure, events organized and supported by AIRO giovani as well as scientific activities are here reported from its creation in 2007 up to current days. RESULTS AIRO Giovani group was able to create a consolidated network between Italian junior radiation oncologists, while opening the possibility to collaborate with junior groups of other national scientific societies in the field of oncology and with ESTRO young members. Scientific projects carried out by the group have been successful and will be further implemented in next years. CONCLUSIONS AIRO Giovani is still in its infancy, but its early positive experience supports the creation and development of young groups within national radiation oncology societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | | | - Berardino De Bari
- Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio "O. Alberti", Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|