Critical structure movement in cervix brachytherapy

[Effect of Brachytherapy Source Dwell Position on Dose Distribution in Cervical Cancer Therapy]

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of different source dwell positions on dose distribution in the treatment of cervical cancer with brachytherapy.

METHODS

Treatment planning data for cervical cancer patients were used. Treatment plans were created at 1 mm intervals, varying up to 5 mm. For intracavitary brachytherapy and intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy, the following dose parameters were evaluated: 90% high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV D90%), rectum 2 cm3 dose (Rectum D2 cc), small intestine 2 cm3 dose (Small D2 cc), sigmoid colon 2 cm3 dose (Sigmoid D2 cc), bladder 2 cm3 dose (Bladder D2 cc), point A dose.

RESULTS

In intracavitary brachytherapy, the HR-CTV D90%, Rectum D2 cc, Small D2 cc, and Sigmoid D2 cc doses increased as the source dwell position changed in the direction. On the other hand, the dose of Bladder D2 cc increased when the source position changed in the outward direction. The same trend was observed in the case of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy.

CONCLUSION

It was shown that a 1 mm change in the source dwell position can affect the dose by up to 2% or more. The accuracy of the source dwell position is very important and should be checked before using the device.

The Current use of Adaptive Strategies for External Beam Radiotherapy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review

AIMS

Variability in the target and organs at risk (OARs) in cervical cancer treatment presents challenges for precise radiotherapy. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) offers the potential to enhance treatment precision and outcomes. However, the increased workload and a lack of consensus on the most suitable ART approach hinder its clinical adoption. This systematic review aims to assess the current use of adaptive strategies for cervical cancer and define the optimal approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of current literature published between January 2012 and May 2023 was conducted. Searches used PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, supplemented with the University of Manchester, Google Scholar, and papers retrieved from reference lists. The review assessed workflows, compared dosimetric benefits, and examined resources for each identified strategy. Excluded were abstracts, conference abstracts, reviews, articles unrelated to ART management, proton therapy, brachytherapy, or qualitative studies. A narrative synthesis involved data tabulation, summarizing selected studies detailing workflow for cervical cancer and dosimetric outcomes for targets and OARs.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria; these were mostly retrospective simulation planning studies, except four studies that had been clinically implemented. We identified five approaches for ART radiotherapy for cervical cancer: reactive and scheduled adaptation, internal target volume (ITV)-based approach using library of plans (LOP), fixed-margin approach using LOP, and real-time adaptation, with each approach reducing irradiated volumes without compromising target coverage compared to the non-ART approach. The LOP-based ITV approach is the most used and clinically assessed.

CONCLUSION

Identifying the optimal strategy is challenging due to dosimetric assessment limitations. Implementing cervical cancer ART necessitates strategic optimization of clinical benefits and resources through research, including studies to identify the optimal frequency, and prospective evaluations of toxicity.

Method to assess the need for re-planning HDR brachytherapy tandem and ring treatments

High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy procedures for cervical cancer require multiple applicator insertions for multiple (typically 5) fractions of a single plan, which carries a risk for variability in applicator position between fractions. Due to applicator displacement relative to patient anatomy, the dose to nearby organs-at-risk (OARs) may vary significantly from one fraction to the next. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of changes in HDR tandem and ring (T&R) applicator position on doses to nearby OARs and to present a quick and simple method to estimate doses to OARs inter-fractionally without having to perform a re-plan. Ninety CT image sets for 20 patients, ages 44 to 86, undergoing T&R-based HDR for cervical cancer were used retrospectively for this study. Measures of applicator positional and angular changes relative to the bony anatomy were obtained using image fusion in MIM software, between the planning CT (plan CT) and the CT on the treatment day (CT-TX). Dosimetric data were determined, also using MIM software, using the original (first fraction) dose distribution applied to organs at risk (rectum and bladder), transferred via rigid registration from the plan CT to each CT-TX. Bladder and rectum contours were also transferred from each plan CT to each CT-TX and were tweaked manually to match anatomy on each CT-TX and examined visually for appropriateness. Differences in translation and rotation of the T&R applicator between the planning CT and subsequent individual fractions were recorded and plotted against dose differences between each fraction of treatment and the original (first) fraction. Absolute dose (D2cc) and volume (V50) differences vs positional shifts were calculated and plotted, and the Pearson Product-Moment correlation coefficient between dose parameters and measured positional shifts was determined. Average dosimetric differences between planned dose and subsequent fractional doses obtained through rigid registration were 1.48 ± 1.92 Gy, 14.91 ± 11.92 cm3, 0.56 ± 0.93 Gy, and 1.77 ± 2.18 cm3 for Bladder D2cc, Bladder V50, Rectum D2cc, and Rectum V50, respectively. Correlation between Bladder V50 and sagittal plane rotation gave an r2 of 0.4, showing the most correlation of all parameters studied. Bladder dose and volume increased by a maximum of about 2.7 Gy and 50 cm3 overall for Bladder D2cc and Bladder V50, respectively. Bladder V50 was most sensitive to T&R applicator displacements. We have quantified the effects of applicator positional changes on dose changes for the bladder and rectum. Even large changes in applicator position between fractions did not result in significant changes in dose to these normal tissues, indicating that adaptive re-planning is not necessary.

Brachytherapy Workflow Practices: Analysis of Different Workflow Scenarios in Patients With Cervical Cancer and Impact on IGBT Implementation-An IAEA Study

PURPOSE

The workflow of brachytherapy (BT) is an essential aspect of treatment to consider in image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT). It has an overarching effect influencing patient throughput and the number of cancer treatments that can be performed as it occupies equipment, space, and personnel. There is limited research addressing this issue. Under the International Atomic Energy Agency's Coordinated Research Activity titled IGBT for cervix cancer: An implementation study, our study analyzes various scenarios in the clinical workflow of BT delivery for cervical cancer. It aims to determine the extent to which these scenarios allow the routine implementation of IGBT. With this information, current barriers and individualized adaptations to efficient workflows can be identified to enhance the global application of IGBT, leading to better cervical cancer treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A web-based poll of questions regarding practices in BT workflow was presented to 62 participants from low-, lower middle-, upper middle-, and high-income countries (19 countries).

RESULTS

This study highlighted diversity in BT practices across countries, income levels, and regions. It identified variations in workflow, patient throughput, and resource availability, which can have implications for the efficiency and quality of BT treatments. Scenario A, utilizing multiple locations for the steps of the BT procedure, was the most commonly used. The availability of resources, such as imaging devices and trained personnel, varied among the participating centers and remained challenging for IGBT implementation and sustainability.

CONCLUSION

The design of the BT facility plays a vital role in improving efficiency, with a dedicated BT suite contributing to an efficient workflow but limiting patient throughput, especially for high-volume centers. Although IGBT is effective, its implementation requires consideration of various logistical challenges and should be individualized.

In vivo dosimetry in pelvic brachytherapy

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This paper describes the potential role for in vivo dosimetry in the reduction of uncertainties in pelvic brachytherapy, the pertinent factors for consideration in clinical practice, and the future potential for in vivo dosimetry in the personalisation of brachytherapy.

Review on Treatment Planning Systems for Cervix Brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy): Some Desirable and Convenient Practical Aspects to Be Implemented from Radiation Oncologist and Medical Physics Perspectives

Intracavitary brachytherapy (BT, Interventional Radiotherapy, IRT), plays an essential role in the curative intent of locally advanced cervical cancer, for which the conventional approach involves external beam radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy followed by BT. This work aims to review the different methodologies used by commercially available treatment planning systems (TPSs) in exclusive magnetic resonance imaging-based (MRI) cervix BT with interstitial component treatments. Practical aspects and improvements to be implemented into the TPSs are discussed. This review is based on the clinical expertise of a group of radiation oncologists and medical physicists and on interactive demos provided by the software manufacturers. The TPS versions considered include all the new tools currently in development for future commercial releases. The specialists from the supplier companies were asked to propose solutions to some of the challenges often encountered in a clinical environment through a questionnaire. The results include not only such answers but also comments by the authors that, in their opinion, could help solve the challenges covered in these questions. This study summarizes the possibilities offered nowadays by commercial TPSs, highlighting the absence of some useful tools that would notably improve the planning of MR-based interstitial component cervix brachytherapy.

Intra-fractional dosimetric analysis of image-guided intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer

Background

To assess the intra-fractional dosimetric variations of image-guided brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

Methods

A total of 38 fractions (9 patients) undergoing brachytherapy for cervical cancer underwent a CT scanning for treatment planning (planning CT) and a Cone-beam CT (CBCT) scanning immediately prior to delivery (pre-delivery CBCT). The variations of volumes as well as the dosimetric impact from treatment planning to delivery (intra-application) were evaluated. The dose volume histogram parameters including volume, D90 of high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) and D2cc of organs at risk (OARs) were recorded.

Results

The relative differences (mean ± 1SD) of the volume and D90 HRCTV across the two scans were − 2.0 ± 3.3% and − 1.2 ± 4.5%, respectively. The variations of D2cc for bladder, rectum, sigmoid and small intestine are − 0.6 ± 17.1%, 9.3 ± 14.6%, 7.2% ± 20.5% and 1.5 ± 12.6%, respectively. Most of them are statistically nonsignificant except the D2cc for rectum, which showed a significant increase (P = 0.001). Using 5% and 10% uncertainty of physical dose for HRCTV at a 6 Gy × 5 high-dose-rate schedule, the possibility of total equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) lower than 85 Gy is close to 0% and 3%, respectively. Performing similar simulation at 15% and 20% uncertainty of a 4 Gy physical dose for OARs, the possibility of total EQD2 dose exceeding 75 Gy is about 70%. Less than 1% of the total EQD2 of OARs would exceed 80 Gy.

Conclusions

Average intra-fractional dosimetric variation of HRCTV was small in an interval of less than 1 h, and the possibility of total EQD2 exceeding 85 Gy is higher than 97%. The intra-fractional dosimetric variations of OARs might result in an overdose for OARs in a single fraction or the whole treatment. It is necessary to detect unfavorable anatomical changes by re-imaging and take interventions to minimize applied doses and reduce the risk of complications.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01870-x.

Computed Tomography-Guided Optimization of Needle Insertion for Combined Intracavitary/Interstitial Brachytherapy With Utrecht Applicator in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

PURPOSE

There are no international guidelines for optimal needle insertion during interstitial intracavitary brachytherapy (IS-ICBT) for cervical cancer. We aimed to investigate the clinical feasibility and added value of computed tomography (CT) guidance to optimize needle insertion in IS-ICBT using the Utrecht applicator and to evaluate needle shifts.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We enrolled 24 patients who were treated with interstitial-brachytherapy. Two CT scans each were performed for every patient: (1) after applicator insertion without needles (CT_preneedle) and (2) after needle insertion (CT_postneedle). In addition to magnetic resonance imaging after external-beam radiation therapy, CT_preneedle was used to determine optimal needle locations and insertion lengths based on applicator and organs at risk positioning on the day of treatment; CT_postneedle was used for IS-ICBT planning. The needle-channel axis was used as a reference to determine needle-shift evolution.

RESULTS

A total of 266 interstitial needles were inserted in 76 of 93 BT fractions with high intra- and interpatient variations in the number of inserted needles. Based on CT_preneedle findings, needle insertion was avoided in 9, 4, 2, and 2 patients at the first, second, third, and fourth fractions, respectively. The unloaded needle frequency was 4%. Average needle contribution to total dwell time was 37.2% ± 19.2%. Shifting was observed in 68% of the needles (mean shift 2.0 ± 2.3 mm), mostly in the posterior direction, and in needles with a larger insertion length. Needle reinsertion was not needed in any patient. No complication due to needle insertion was observed, except for minor vaginal bleeding in 1 patient after needle removal.

CONCLUSIONS

The adaptive CT-guided IS-ICBT application was feasible and resulted in fewer unloaded needle insertions or complications and more efficient use with higher needle contribution to the treatment. Needle shift was frequent but did not require needle reinsertion with the proposed method.

Comparison of predictive performance for toxicity by accumulative dose of DVH parameter addition and DIR addition for cervical cancer patients

We compared predictive performance between dose volume histogram (DVH) parameter addition and deformable image registration (DIR) addition for gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in cervical cancer patients. A total of 59 patients receiving brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy were analyzed retrospectively. The accumulative dose was calculated by three methods: conventional DVH parameter addition, full DIR addition and partial DIR addition. ${D}_{2{cm}^3}$, ${D}_{1{cm}^3}$ and ${D}_{0.1{cm}^3}$ (minimum doses to the most exposed 2 cm3, 1cm3 and 0.1 cm3 of tissue, respectively) of the rectum and sigmoid were calculated by each method. V50, V60 and V70 Gy (volume irradiated over 50, 60 and 70 Gy, respectively) were calculated in full DIR addition. The DVH parameters were compared between toxicity (≥grade1) and non-toxicity groups. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were compared to evaluate the predictive performance of each method. The differences between toxicity and non-toxicity groups in ${D}_{2{cm}^3}$ were 0.2, 5.7 and 3.1 Gy for the DVH parameter addition, full DIR addition and partial DIR addition, respectively. The AUCs of ${D}_{2{cm}^3}$ were 0.51, 0.67 and 0.57 for DVH parameter addition, full DIR addition and partial DIR addition, respectively. In full DIR addition, the difference in dose between toxicity and non-toxicity was the largest and AUC was the highest. AUCs of V50, V60 and V70 Gy were 0.51, 0.63 and 0.62, respectively, and V60 and V70 were high values close to the value of ${D}_{2{cm}^3}$ of the full DIR addition. Our results suggested that the full DIR addition may have the potential to predict toxicity more accurately than the conventional DVH parameter addition, and that it could be more effective to accumulate to all pelvic irradiation by DIR.

Excess dose-related parameters (Vex, Rex, and iRex): novel predictors and late toxicity correlations in cervical cancer image-guided adaptive brachytherapy

PURPOSE

In this paper, excess dose is originally proposed to represent the dose outside the target volume that encompass only organs at risk (OARs), not the whole dose volume of isodose surface volume (ISV). By means of spatial consideration, excess dose-related parameters would also compensate inconsistent applicator positions and OARs motion, which may deviate the identical dose small-volume assumption of D2cc. Late toxicity correlations of these parameters were investigated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on cervical cancer high-dose-rate image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (HDR-IGABT). From ISVs of 60 to 100 Gy EQD2 (a/β = 3), excess dose-related parameters were derived as following: toxicity negligible volume (Vneg = V60 of toxicity negligible organs; high-risk clinical target volume - HR-CTV, uterus, and vagina), excess dose volume (Vex = ISV - Vneg), Vneg normalized parameters of excess dose volume ratio (Rex = Vex/Vneg), and indirect excess dose volume ratio (iRex = ISV/Vneg). Relationships between toxicity and these parameters were analyzed using a mean difference and a probit analysis method. Net reclassification indices (NRIs) were used to compare iRex60 and D2cc gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity prediction.

RESULTS

From 143 cases with an incidence of 34.9% and 10.5% of 3-year grade 2-4 GI and genitourinary (GU) toxicity, respectively, comparisons of means showed significant difference between grade 0-1 and 2-4 toxicities for late GI toxicity for all parameters, except ISV. There was a dose-response relationship with toxicity for each parameter across the range of 60-100 Gy EQD2. ED10 of iRex60 and iRex70 were 2.1 and 1.2, respectively. By comparing iRex60 and D2cc, additive and absolute NRIs were +6.45 and +7.69%, respectively. The reclassification significantly occurred in range of 65-75 Gy of rectum D2cc.

CONCLUSIONS

Excess dose-related parameters, including Vex, Rex, and iRex, showed significant mean differences and parameter-toxicity relationships for late GI but not for GU toxicities. Positive NRIs suggest iRex60 utilization for spatial control of dose expansion, in addition to high-dose control with OAR small volumes. Further investigations are needed to define the optimum use of these predictors.

UK audit of target volume and organ at risk delineation and dose optimisation for cervix radiotherapy treatments

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of the extent of variation in delineations and dose optimisation performed at multiple UK centres as a result of interobserver variation and protocol differences.

METHODS

CT/MR images of 2 cervical cancer patients previously treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and Brachytherapy were distributed to 11 UK centres. Centres delineated structures and produced treatment plans following their local protocol. Organ at risk delineations were assessed dosimetrically through application of the original treatment plan and target volume delineations were assessed in terms of variation in absolute volume and length, width and height. Treatment plan variation was assessed across all centres and across centres that followed EMBRACE II. Treatment plans were assessed using total EQD2 delivered and were compared to EMBRACE II dose aims. Variation in combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy treatments was also assessed.

RESULTS

Brachytherapy target volume delineations contained variation due to differences in protocol used, window/level technique and differences in interpretations of grey zones. Planning target volume delineations were varied due to protocol differences and extended parametrial tissue inclusion. All centres met EMBRACE II plan aims for PTV V95 and high-riskclinical target volume D90 EQD2, despite variation in prescription dose, fractionation and treatment technique.

CONCLUSION

Brachytherapy target volume delineations are varied due to differences in contouring guidelines and protocols used. Planning target volume delineations are varied due to the uncertainties surrounding the extent of parametrial involvement. Dosimetric optimisation is sufficient across all centres to satisfy EMBRACE II planning aims despite significant variation in protocols used.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Previous multi-institutional audits of cervical cancer radiotherapy practices have been performed in Europe and the USA. This study is the first of its kind to be performed in the UK.

Quantitative analysis of intra-fractional variation in CT-based image guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer patients

We quantified intra-fractional dose variation and organ movement during CT-based 3D-image guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT) in cervical cancer patients. Fifteen patients who underwent CT-based 3D-IGBT were studied. For all patients, pre-delivery CT for treatment planning after applicator insertion and post-delivery CT after dose delivery without changing the applicator position were acquired. Pre- and post-delivery CT were rigidly fused by matching the inserted applicator and planned dose on pre-delivery CT (pre-delivery dose) was mapped on post-delivery CT (post-delivery dose). D2, D1, and D0.1 cm³ of the rectum and bladder were compared between pre- and post-delivery doses with contours on each CT image. Organ movement and deformation was evaluated using deformation vector fields calculated by deformable image registration between pre- and post-delivery CT. We also evaluated dose variation and DVF between with and without a catheter to control filling. Differences in all DVH parameters were <±3% in physical dose and ± 5% in EQD2. However, a > 15% dose difference was found in 13.8% of the fractions in rectum D2 cm³ and in 11.1% of those in bladder D2 cm³. The mean value of DVF for bladder was larger than that of rectum, especially for the superior-inferior (S-I) direction. Insertion catheters in bladder reduced mean dose and DVF variation compared with that of without catheters. In fraction groups with large dose increasing, DVF in the S-I direction was significantly larger than that of other fraction groups. Our results indicated that preparation is needed to reduce changes in the S-I direction affect dose variation.

Appropriate Methodology for EBRT and HDR Intracavitary/Interstitial Brachytherapy Dose Composite and Clinical Plan Evaluation for Patients With Cervical Cancer

PURPOSE

This study assessed the appropriateness of full parameter addition (FPA) methods with respect to the 3-dimensional deformable dose composite method for evaluating combined external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 22 patients who received EBRT and high-dose-rate ICBT were retrospectively evaluated. Split-ring and tandem applicators were used for all patients. Additional interstitial needles were used for 5 patients to supplement the implant. Deformable image registrations were performed to deform the secondary EBRT and ICBT planning computed tomography (CT) images onto the reference CT from the third fraction of ICBT. The Dice similarity coefficient was used to evaluate the quality of deformable registration. Doses were transferred to the reference CT, scaled to the equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions and combined to create the dose composite. Eight dose-accumulation methods were evaluated and compared. D_2cc and D_0.1cc for organs at risk were investigated.

RESULTS

The differences in D_2cc for rectum, bladder, sigmoid, and bowel between the FPA method for whole-pelvis EBRT and ICBT, calculated using an old American Brachytherapy Society worksheet (FPA_E_h + I_old) and deformable composite for EBRT with boosts and ICBT (Def_E + B + I) were -2.19 ± 1.37 Gy_{α/β = 3}, -0.64 ± 1.13 Gy_{α/β = 3}, -2.06 ± 2.71 Gy_{α/β = 3}, and -1.59 ± 0.89 Gy_{α/β = 3}, respectively. The differences in D_2cc for rectum, bladder, sigmoid, and bowel between the new ABS worksheet (FPA_E_h + B + I_abs) and the Def_E + B + I method were 1.21 ± 1.22 Gy _{α/β = 3}, 1.93 ± 1.38 Gy_{α/β = 3}, 0.72 ± 1.12 Gy_{α/β = 3}, and 1.19 ± 1.46 Gy_{α/β = 3}, respectively. Differences in dose-volume histogram parameter values among Def_E + B + I and other FPA methods were not statistically significant (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the FPA-based method, deformable registration-based dose composites demonstrated lower OAR D_2cc and D_0.1cc values; however, the differences were not statistically significant. The current ABS-recommended FPA-based sheet can serve as an acceptable plan evaluation tool for clinical purposes.

Can MRI-only replace MRI-CT planning with a titanium tandem and ovoid applicator?

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

To evaluate dosimetric differences between MRI-only and MRI-CT planning with a titanium tandem and ovoid applicator to determine if all imaging and planning goals can be achieved with MRI only.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We evaluated 10 patients who underwent MRI-CT-based cervical brachytherapy with a titanium tandem and ovoid applicator. High-risk clinical target volume and organs at risk were contoured on the 3D T2 MRI, which were transferred to the co-registered CT, where the applicator was identified. Retrospectively, three planners independently delineated the applicator on the axial 3D T2 MRI while blinded to the CT. Identical dwell position times in the delivered plan were loaded. Dose-volume histogram parameters were compared to the previously delivered MRI-CT plan.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in dose to D₉₀ or D₉₈ of the high-risk clinical target volume with MRI vs. MRI-CT planning. MRI vs. MRI-CT planning resulted in mean D_0.1cc bladder of 8.8 ± 3.4 Gy vs. 8.5 ± 3.2 Gy (p = 0.29) and D_2cc bladder of 6.2 ± 1.4 Gy vs. 6.0 ± 1.4 Gy (p = 0.33), respectively. Mean D_0.1cc rectum was 5.7 ± 1.2 Gy vs. 5.3 ± 1.2 Gy (p = 0.03) and D_2cc rectum 4.0 ± 0.8 Gy vs. 4.2 ± 1.0 Gy (p = 0.18), respectively. Mean D_0.1cc sigmoid was 5.2 ± 1.3 Gy vs. 5.4 ± 1.6 Gy (p = 0.23) and D_2cc sigmoid 3.9 ± 1.0 Gy vs. 4.0 ± 1.1 Gy (p = 0.18), respectively.

CONCLUSION

There were no clinically significant dosimetric differences between the MRI and MRI-CT plans. This study demonstrates that cervical brachytherapy with a titanium applicator can be planned with MRI alone, which is now our clinical standard.

Clinical outcomes with MRI-guided image-based brachytherapy in cervical cancer: An institutional experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term disease control and toxicity to the organs at risk after dose-escalated image-based adaptive brachytherapy (BT) in cervical cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixty patients of cervical cancer were treated with external radiotherapy 46 Gy in 23 fractions with weekly cisplatin and MRI-guided BT 7 Gy × 4 fractions with a minimum dose of 85.7 Gy (EQD2) to the high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV). The BT dose was initially prescribed to point A and plans were optimized to ensure coverage of both point A and HRCTV while maintaining doses to the organs at risk within the recommended constraints. Patients were followed up clinically every three months for the first two years and six months thereafter. Toxicity scoring for urinary and bowel symptoms was done using CTCAE version 3.0.

RESULTS

The mean doses to the point A and D90 HRCTV were 85.5 (±2.75) Gy and 98.4 (±9.6) Gy EQD2 respectively. The mean 2 cc EQD2, the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 90.6 Gy, 70.2 Gy, and 74.2 Gy respectively. The overall survival at a median followup of 49.8 months was 91.66%. Six (10%) patients developed grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. One patient developed grade 3 bladder toxicity. The incidence of bladder, rectal, and sigmoid toxicity increased significantly with doses >85 Gy, 66 Gy, and >71 Gy EQD2 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

While the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity was low (8.3% for gastrointestinal toxicity and 1.6% for bladder), the threshold for development of grade 1-2 bladder and rectal toxicity was lower than the doses recommended by the GEC-ESTRO group. By adhering to volume-based prescriptions, there is scope of further reduction in toxicity to organs at risk.

3D image-based adapted high-dose-rate brachytherapy in cervical cancer with and without interstitial needles: measurement of applicator shift between imaging and dose delivery

Purpose

Using 3D image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer treatment, it often means that patients are transported and moved during the treatment procedure. The purpose of this study was to determine the intra-fractional longitudinal applicator shift in relation to the high risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) by comparing geometries at imaging and dose delivery for patients with and without needles.

Material and methods

Measurements were performed in 33 patients (71 fractions), where 25 fractions were without and 46 were with interstitial needles. Gold markers were placed in the lower part of the cervix as a surrogate for HR-CTV, enabling distance measurements between HR-CTV and the ring applicator. Shifts of the applicator relative to the markers were determined using planning computed tomography (CT) images used for planning, and the radiographs obtained at dose delivery. Differences in the physical D₉₀ for HR-CTV due to applicator shifts were simulated individually in the treatment planning system to provide the relative dose variation.

Results

The maximum distances of the applicator shifts, in relation to the markers, were 3.6 mm (caudal), and –2.5 mm (cranial). There was a significant displacement of –0.7 mm (SD = 0.9 mm) without needles, while with needles there was no significant shift. The relative dose variation showed a significant increase in D₉₀ HR-CTV of 1.6% (SD = 2.6%) when not using needles, and no significant dose variation was found when using needles.

Conclusions

The results from this study showed that there was a small longitudinal displacement of the ring applicator and a significant difference in displacement between using interstitial needles or not.

Parallelized patient-specific quality assurance for high-dose-rate image-guided brachytherapy in an integrated computed tomography-on-rails brachytherapy suite

PURPOSE

To describe a parallelized patient-specific quality assurance (QA) program designed to ensure safety and quality in image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy in an integrated computed tomography (CT)-on-rails brachytherapy suite.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A patient-specific QA program has been modified for the image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) program in an integrated CT-on-rails brachytherapy suite. In the modification of the QA procedures of Task Group-59, the additional patient-specific QA procedures are included to improve rapid IGBT workflow with applicator placement, imaging, planning, treatment, and applicator removal taking place in one room.

RESULTS

The IGBT workflow is partitioned into two groups of tasks that can be performed in parallel by two or more staff members. One of the unique components of our implemented workflow is that groups work together to perform QA steps in parallel and in series during treatment planning and contouring. Coordinating efforts in this systematic way enable rapid and safe brachytherapy treatment while incorporating 3-dimensional anatomic variations between treatment days.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of these patient-specific QA procedures in an integrated CT-on-rails brachytherapy suite ensures confidence that a rapid workflow IGBT program can be implemented without sacrificing patient safety or quality and deliver highly-conformal dose to target volumes. These patient-specific QA components may be adapted to other IGBT environments that seek to provide rapid workflow while ensuring quality.

Evaluation of intrafraction motion of the organs at risk in image-based brachytherapy of cervical cancer

PURPOSE/INTRODUCTION

To assess the variation in the doses received by the organs at risk (OARs) that can occur during treatment planning of cervical cancer by image-based brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

After intracavitary application, two sets of images-CT and MRI-were obtained. The two sets of images were fused together with respect to the applicator. Contouring was done separately on CT and MR images. Dose received by the OARs on CT images with respect to the plans made on the MR images was estimated and compared with those on the MR images.

RESULTS

Although there was always a difference between the dose received by the OARs based on the CT and MRI contours, it was not significant for the bladder and rectum; 2 cc doses differed by 0.49 Gy (±0.44) p = 0.28 for the bladder and 0.30 Gy (±0.29) p = 0.16 for the rectum. The 1 cc and 0.1 cc differences were also not significant. However for the sigmoid colon, there was significant intrafraction variation in the 2 cc doses 0.61 (±0.6) p = 0.001, 1 cc doses 0.73 (±0.67) Gy p = 0.00, and 0.1 cc dose 0.97 (±0.93) Gy p = 0.009.

CONCLUSIONS

The variation in the doses to the OARs must be considered while weighing target coverage against overdose to the OARs. Although not significant for the bladder and rectum, it was significant for the sigmoid colon. Estimated doses to OARs on the planning system may not be the same dose delivered at the time of treatment.

In vivo dosimetry: trends and prospects for brachytherapy

The error types during brachytherapy (BT) treatments and their occurrence rates are not well known. The limited knowledge is partly attributed to the lack of independent verification systems of the treatment progression in the clinical workflow routine. Within the field of in vivo dosimetry (IVD), it is established that real-time IVD can provide efficient error detection and treatment verification. However, it is also recognized that widespread implementations are hampered by the lack of available high-accuracy IVD systems that are straightforward for the clinical staff to use. This article highlights the capabilities of the state-of-the-art IVD technology in the context of error detection and quality assurance (QA) and discusses related prospects of the latest developments within the field. The article emphasizes the main challenges responsible for the limited practice of IVD and provides descriptions on how they can be overcome. Finally, the article suggests a framework for collaborations between BT clinics that implemented IVD on a routine basis and postulates that such collaborations could improve BT QA measures and the knowledge about BT error types and their occurrence rates.

CT-on-rails-guided HDR brachytherapy: single-room, rapid-workflow treatment delivery with integrated image guidance

ABSTRACT: 

Brachytherapy is an important component of multidisciplinary cancer care for a variety of solid tumors. Most systems require moving the patient to multiple locations for treatment planning and delivery after the applicator is placed. A dedicated computed tomography (CT)-on-rails brachytherapy suite was installed at our institution to allow image-guided brachytherapy and a rapid scan–plan–treat workflow that is well suited to a busy quaternary care medical center. The suite consists of an OR couch with CT-compatible insert, a CT-on-rails imaging unit, a Varian Varisource iX HDR afterloader and full anesthesia capabilities. The explicit goal was to provide the ability to perform applicator placement, CT-guided treatment planning, and treatment delivery efficiently and without moving the patient. The dedicated CT-on-rails suite for high-dose-rate brachytherapy offers image-guided brachytherapy capabilities with a rapid workflow that lends itself well to efficient, high-quality care that can meet the demands of a large-volume referral center capable of high patient throughput.

Dosimetric impacts of applicator displacements and applicator reconstruction-uncertainties on 3D image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer

PURPOSE

To quantify the dosimetric impact of applicator displacements and applicator reconstruction-uncertainties through simulated planning studies of virtual applicator shifts.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty randomly selected high-dose-rate (HDR) titanium tandem-and-ovoid (T&O) plans were retrospectively studied. MRI-guided, conformal brachytherapy (MRIG-CBT) plans were retrospectively generated. To simulate T&O displacement, the whole T&O set was virtually shifted on treatment planning system in the cranial (+) and the caudal (-) direction after each dose calculation. Each shifted plan was compared to an unshifted plan. To simulate T&O reconstruction-uncertainties, each tandem and ovoid was separately shifted along its axis before performing the dose calculation. After the dose calculation, the calculated isodose lines and T&O were moved back to unshifted T&O position. Shifted and shifted-back plan were compared.

RESULTS

Regarding the dosimetric impact of the simulated T&O displacements, rectal D2cc values were observed as being the most sensitive to change due to T&O displacement among all dosimetric metrics regardless of point A (p < 0.013) or MRIG-CBT plans (p < 0.0277). To avoid more than 10% change, ± 1.5 mm T&O displacements were accommodated for both point A and MRIG-CBT plans. The dosimetric impact of T&O displacements on sigmoid (p < 0.0005), bladder (p < 0.0001), HR-CTV (p < 0.0036), and point A (p < 0.0015) were significantly larger in the MRIG-CBT plans than point A plans. Regarding the dosimetric impact of T&O reconstruction-uncertainties, less than ± 3.0 mm reconstruction-uncertainties were also required in order to avoid more than 10% dosimetric change in either the point A or MRIG-CBT plans.

CONCLUSIONS

The dosimetric impact of simulated T&O displacements was significantly larger in the MRIG-CBT plans than in the point A plans. Either ± 3 mm T&O displacement or a ± 4.5 mm T&O reconstruction-uncertainty could cause greater than 10% dosimetric change for both point A plans and MRIG-CBT plans.

A multicentre comparison of the dosimetric impact of inter- and intra-fractional anatomical variations in fractionated cervix cancer brachytherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To compare the dosimetric impact of organ and target variations relative to the applicator for intracavitary brachytherapy by a multicentre analysis with different application techniques and fractionation schemes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

DVH data from 363 image/contour sets (120 patients, 6 institutions) were included for 1-6 fractions per patient, with imaging intervals ranging from several hours to ∼20 days. Variations between images acquired within one (intra-application) or between consecutive applicator insertions (inter-application) were evaluated. Dose plans based on a reference MR or CT image series were superimposed onto subsequent image sets and D(2cm(3)) for the bladder, rectum and sigmoid and D(90) for HR CTV were recorded.

RESULTS

For the whole sample, the systematic dosimetric variations for all organs at risk, i.e. mean variations of D(2cm(3)), were found to be minor (<5%), while random variations, i.e. standard deviations were found to be high due to large variations in individual cases. The D(2cm(3)) variations (mean±1SD) were 0.6±19.5%, 4.1±21.7% and 1.6±26.8%, for the bladder, rectum and sigmoid. For HR CTV, the variations of D90 were found to be -1.1±13.1% for the whole sample. Grouping of the results by intra- and inter-application variations showed that random uncertainties for bladder and sigmoid were 3-7% larger when re-implanting the applicator for individual fractions. No statistically significant differences between the two groups were detected in dosimetric variations for the HR CTV. Using 20% uncertainty of physical dose for OAR and 10% for HR CTV, the effects on total treatment dose for a 4 fraction HDR schedule at clinically relevant dose levels were found to be 4-8 Gy EQD2 for OAR and 3 Gy EQD2 for HR CTV.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial variations occur in fractionated cervix cancer BT with higher impact close to clinical threshold levels. The treatment approach has to balance uncertainties for individual cases against the use of repetitive imaging, adaptive planning and dose delivery.