1
|
Kashihara T, Urago Y, Okamoto H, Takemori M, Nakayama H, Mikasa S, Nakaichi T, Iijima K, Chiba T, Kuwahara J, Nakamura S, Chang W, Matsui Y, Igaki H. A preliminary study on rectal dose reduction associated with hyaluronic acid implantation in brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Asian J Urol 2024; 11:286-293. [PMID: 38680582 PMCID: PMC11053323 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Hydrogel spacer (HS) was developed to reduce rectal toxicities caused by radiotherapy, but has been reported to cause major adverse events. Our institute has attempted to introduce a hyaluronic acid (HA) as an alternative spacer. This study aimed to compare rectal doses and geometric distributions between the HS and HA implantation in prostate cancer. Methods HS and HA were inserted in 20 and 18 patients undergoing high-dose brachytherapy, respectively. The rectum spacer volumes injected were 10 mL and 22 mL, respectively. In the treatment planning system, 13.5 Gy was administered with common catheter positions. The rectal dose indices were assessed between the spacer groups for dosimetry evaluation. Distances between the prostate and rectum and configurations of the spacers were compared. Results The mean doses irradiated to 0.1 and 2 mL of the rectum were 10.45 Gy and 6.71 Gy for HS, and 6.73 Gy and 4.90 Gy for HA (p<0.001). The mean minimum distances between the prostate and rectum were 1.23 cm and 1.79 cm for HS and HA, respectively (p<0.05). Geometrical configuration comparisons revealed that HA has a higher ability to expand the space than HS. Conclusion The rectal dose reduction ability of HA is significantly greater than that of HS, suggesting its potential as a new spacer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tairo Kashihara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuka Urago
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 7-2-10 Higashi-Ogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okamoto
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mihiro Takemori
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 7-2-10 Higashi-Ogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Nakayama
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 7-2-10 Higashi-Ogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shohei Mikasa
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsu Nakaichi
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kotaro Iijima
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahito Chiba
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junichi Kuwahara
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiological Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nakamura
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Weishan Chang
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 7-2-10 Higashi-Ogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Matsui
- Department of Urological Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Igaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abdelhakiem MK, Keller A, Bajpai RR, Smith RP, Beriwal S, Benoit R. Cs-131 prostate brachytherapy boost and effect of hydrogel rectal spacer on long-term patient-reported rectal bleeding and bowel quality of life. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:808-821. [PMID: 37648596 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study evaluates long-term patient-reported bowel quality of life (QOL), rectal bleeding, and bleeding bother in patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and Cesium-131 LDR brachytherapy (LDR-BT) boost with and without hydrogel rectal spacer. METHODS AND MATERIALS This is a retrospective analysis of prostate cancer patients treated between 2007 and 2022 with 45 Gy EBRT followed by 85 Gy Cs-131 LDR-BT boost with or without hydrogel rectal spacer. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) QOL questionnaires pre-treatment and at each follow-up were collected. Patient-reported rectal bleeding occurring more than "rarely" and bother from rectal bleeding occurring more than a "very small problem" were deemed clinically significant. Fisher's exact test was used to test the association of rectal spacer use and the incidence of clinically significant rectal bleeding and bleeding bother. Paired samples t-test was used to analyze mean bowel scores at each time point. RESULTS Three hundred and forty-one patients were included in the analysis. The rectal spacer was used in 108 patients. Overall median follow-up was 48 months (IQR, 24-72), with a median follow-up of 24 months (IQR, 12-37.5) for the hydrogel group and 60 months (IQR, 36-84) for the non-hydrogel group. EPIC questionnaire response rates at median follow-up were 33% and 37% for the hydrogel and non-hydrogel groups, respectively. A clinically significant decrease in mean bowel domain scores was seen in the bowel bother domain at 6 and 12 months for patients who did not receive a rectal spacer. At the last follow-up of 60 months, the prevalence of clinically significant rectal bleeding and bleeding bother were 2.2% and 2.2%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of clinically significant long-term rectal bleeding was 2.8% and 18.9% in the hydrogel group and non-hydrogel group, respectively (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.0001). The cumulative incidence of clinically significant long-term bowel bother was 4.6% and 19.7% in the hydrogel group and non-hydrogel group, respectively (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Use of hydrogel rectal spacer with EBRT and Cs-131 LDR-BT boost was significantly associated with a lower incidence of patient-reported rectal bleeding and bother from rectal bleeding, and better long-term bowel QOL. Cumulative incidence was 2.8% (hydrogel group) versus 18.9% (non-hydrogel group) and 4.6% (hydrogel group) versus 19.7% (non-hydrogel group) for clinically significant long-term rectal bleeding and long-term bleeding bother, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Keller
- Radiation Oncology, AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL
| | - Rajesh R Bajpai
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Ryan P Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AHN Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Varian Medical Systems, Charlottesville, VA.
| | - Ronald Benoit
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prisciandaro J, Zoberi JE, Cohen G, Kim Y, Johnson P, Paulson E, Song W, Hwang KP, Erickson B, Beriwal S, Kirisits C, Mourtada F. AAPM Task Group Report 303 endorsed by the ABS: MRI Implementation in HDR Brachytherapy-Considerations from Simulation to Treatment. Med Phys 2022; 49:e983-e1023. [PMID: 35662032 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The Task Group (TG) on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Implementation in High Dose Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy - Considerations from Simulation to Treatment, TG 303, was constituted by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine's (AAPM's) Science Council under the direction of the Therapy Physics Committee, the Brachytherapy Subcommittee, and the Working Group on Brachytherapy Clinical Applications. The TG was charged with developing recommendations for commissioning, clinical implementation, and on-going quality assurance (QA). Additionally, the TG was charged with describing HDR brachytherapy (BT) workflows and evaluating practical consideration that arise when implementing MR imaging. For brevity, the report is focused on the treatment of gynecologic and prostate cancer. The TG report provides an introduction and rationale for MRI implementation in BT, a review of previous publications on topics including available applicators, clinical trials, previously published BT related TG reports, and new image guided recommendations beyond CT based practices. The report describes MRI protocols and methodologies, including recommendations for the clinical implementation and logical considerations for MR imaging for HDR BT. Given the evolution from prescriptive to risk-based QA,1 an example of a risk-based analysis using MRI-based, prostate HDR BT is presented. In summary, the TG report is intended to provide clear and comprehensive guidelines and recommendations for commissioning, clinical implementation, and QA for MRI-based HDR BT that may be utilized by the medical physics community to streamline this process. This report is endorsed by the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gil'ad Cohen
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Perry Johnson
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | | | - Ken-Pin Hwang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Sushil Beriwal
- Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Firas Mourtada
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dosimetric feasibility of moderately hypofractionated/dose escalated radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer with intensity-modulated proton beam therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-IMPT) and impact of hydrogel prostate-rectum spacer. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:64. [PMID: 35365170 PMCID: PMC8973648 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02025-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To examine the dosimetric feasibility of hypofractionated/dose escalated radiation therapy in patients with localized prostate carcinoma using simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (SIB-IMPT) in absence or presence of prostate-rectum spacer.
Methods IMPT technique was implemented in 23 patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer treated at West German Proton Therapy Centre from March 2016 till June 2018, using SIB technique prescribing 60 GyRBE and 72 GyRBE in 30 fractions to PTV1 (prostate and seminal vesicle) and PTV2 boost (prostate and proximal seminal vesicle), respectively. In 15 patients, a transperineal injection of hydrogel was applied prior to radiotherapy to increase the distance between prostate and rectum. Planning and all treatments were performed with a 120 ml fluid-filled endorectal balloon customised daily for each patient. For each patient, 2 lateral IMPT beams were implemented taking a field-specific range uncertainty (RU) into account. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were analyzed for PTV2, PTV2 with range uncertainty margin (PTV2RU), rectum, bladder, right/left femoral heads, and penile bulb. For late rectal toxicities, the normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) were calculated using different biological models. A DVH- and NTCP-based dosimetric comparison was carried out between non-spacer and spacer groups. Results For the 23 patients, high-quality plans could be achieved for target volume and for other organs at risk (OARs). For PTV2, the V107% was 0% and the Dmax did not exceed 106.2% of the prescribed dose. The volume PTV2RU covered by 95% of the dose ranged from 96.16 to 99.95%. The conformality index for PTV2RU was 1.12 ± 0.057 and the homogeneity index (HI) was 1.04 ± 0.014. Rectum Dmax and rectal volume receiving 73–50 Gy could be further reduced for the spacer-group. Significant reductions in mean and median rectal NTCPs (stenosis/necrosis, late rectal bleeding ≥ 2, and late rectal toxicities ≥ 3) were predicted for the spacer group in comparison to the non-spacer group. Conclusion Hypofractionated/dose escalated radiotherapy with SIB-IMPT is dosimetrically feasible. Further reduction of the rectal volumes receiving high and medium dose levels (73–50 Gy) and rectal NTCP could be achieved through injection of spacers between rectum and prostate.
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang H, Wang L, Riegel AC, Antone J, Potters L, Lee L, Cao Y. Biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer insertion. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13584. [PMID: 35285578 PMCID: PMC9194986 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate rectal dose reduction in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and low‐dose‐rate (LDR) brachytherapy with insertion of hydrogel spacer (SpaceOAR). For this study, 35 patients receiving hydrogel spacer and 30 patients receiving no spacer were retrospectively enrolled. Patient was treated to doses of 45 Gy to the primary tumor site and nodal regions over 25 fractions using VMAT and 100 Gy to the prostate using prostate seed implant (PSI). In VMAT plans of patients with no spacer, mean doses of rectal wall were 43.6, 42.4, 40.1, and 28.8 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm3, respectively. In patients with SpaceOAR, average rectal wall doses decreased to 39.0, 36.9, 33.5, and 23.9 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm3, respectively (p < 0.01). In PSI plans, rectal wall doses were on average 78.5, 60.9, 41.8, and 14.8 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm3, respectively, in patients without spacer. In contrast, the doses decreased to 34.5, 28.4, 20.6 (p < 0.01), and 8.5 Gy (p < 0.05) to rectal wall volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm3, respectively, in patient with SpaceOAR. To demonstrate rectal sum dose sparing, dose‐biological effective dose (BED) calculation was accomplished in those patients who showed >60% overlap of rectal volumetric doses between VMAT and PSI. In patients with SpaceOAR, average BEDsum was decreased up to 34%, which was 90.1, 78.9, 65.9, and 40.8 Gy to rectal volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm3, respectively, in comparison to 137.4, 116.7, 93.0, and 50.2 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm3, respectively, in those with no spacer. Our result suggested a significant reduction of rectal doses in those patients who underwent a combination of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honglai Zhang
- Department of Radiation Medicine Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success New York USA
| | - Lin Wang
- Department of Radiation Medicine Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success New York USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine Zucker School of Medicine at Northwell/Hofstra Hempstead New York USA
| | - Adam C. Riegel
- Department of Radiation Medicine Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success New York USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine Zucker School of Medicine at Northwell/Hofstra Hempstead New York USA
| | - Jeffrey Antone
- Department of Radiation Medicine Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success New York USA
| | - Louis Potters
- Department of Radiation Medicine Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success New York USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine Zucker School of Medicine at Northwell/Hofstra Hempstead New York USA
| | - Lucille Lee
- Department of Radiation Medicine Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success New York USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine Zucker School of Medicine at Northwell/Hofstra Hempstead New York USA
| | - Yijian Cao
- Department of Radiation Medicine Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success New York USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine Zucker School of Medicine at Northwell/Hofstra Hempstead New York USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Teyateeti A, Grossman C, Kollmeier MA, Fiasconaro M, Hopkins M, McBride S, Gorovets D, Shasha D, Cohen G, Zhang Z, Lesser DJ, Damato A, Zelefsky MJ. Influence of hydrogel spacer placement with prostate brachytherapy on rectal and urinary toxicity. BJU Int 2022; 129:337-344. [PMID: 34388295 PMCID: PMC9472451 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the influence of rectal hydrogel spacer placement (HSP) on late rectal toxicity outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy, with or without supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 224 patients underwent LDR brachytherapy with HSP, as monotherapy or combined with EBRT, between January 2016 and December 2019. Dosimetric variables reflecting the extent of rectal sparing and late rectal toxicity outcomes were evaluated. This spacer cohort was retrospectively compared to a similar patient group (n = 139) in whom HSP was not used. RESULTS Hydrogel spacer placement was associated with significantly reduced rectal doses for all dosimetric variables; the median percentage rectal dose to 1 cc of rectum and rectal dose to 2 cc of rectum of the spacer cohort were all significantly lower compared to the non-spacer cohort. The incidence rates of overall (any grade) and grade ≥2 rectal toxicity were lower in patients with HSP compared to patients who did not undergo HSP: 12% and 1.8% vs 31% and 5.8%, respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of overall rectal toxicity was significantly lower with HSP than without (15% vs 33%; P < 0.001), corresponding to an overall rectal toxicity reduction on univariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.73; P = 0.001). In this patient cohort treated with prostate brachytherapy, none of the urethral dosimetric variables or the presence or absence of HSP was associated with late urinary toxicity. CONCLUSION Hydrogel rectal spacer placement is a safe procedure, associated with significantly reduced rectal dose. HSP translates to a decrease in overall late rectal toxicity in patients receiving dose-escalated brachytherapy-based procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achiraya Teyateeti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Craig Grossman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Marisa A. Kollmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Megan Fiasconaro
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Margaret Hopkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Sean McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Daniel Gorovets
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Daniel Shasha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Gilad Cohen
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - David J Lesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Antonio Damato
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cellini F, Tagliaferri L, Frascino V, Alitto AR, Fionda B, Boldrini L, Romano A, Casà C, Catucci F, Mattiucci GC, Valentini V. Radiation therapy for prostate cancer: What's the best in 2021. Urologia 2022; 89:5-15. [PMID: 34496707 DOI: 10.1177/03915603211042335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is highly involved in the management of prostate cancer. Its features and potential applications experienced a radical evolution over last decades, as they are associated to the continuous evolution of available technology and current oncological innovations. Some application of radiotherapy like brachytherapy have been recently enriched by innovative features and multidisciplinary dedications. In this report we aim to put some questions regarding the following issues regarding multiple aspects of modern application of radiation oncology: the current application of radiation oncology; the modern role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for both the management of primary lesions and for lymph-nodal recurrence; the management of the oligometastatic presentations; the role of brachytherapy; the aid played by the application of the organ at risk spacer (spacer OAR), fiducial markers, electromagnetic tracking systems and on-line Magnetic Resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT), and the role of the new opportunity represented by radiomic analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cellini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Frascino
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Alitto
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Fionda
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Romano
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Calogero Casà
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
- Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kesharwani P, Bisht A, Alexander A, Dave V, Sharma S. Biomedical applications of hydrogels in drug delivery system: An update. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
9
|
Hydrogel spacers and prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2021; 21:75-78. [PMID: 34711449 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
10
|
Kamran SC, McClatchy DM, Pursley J, Trofimov AV, Remillard K, Saraf A, Ghosh A, Thabet A, Sutphin P, Miyamoto DT, Efstathiou JA. Characterization of an Iodinated Rectal Spacer for Prostate Photon and Proton Radiation Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 12:135-144. [PMID: 34619374 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Conventional rectal spacers (nonI-SPs) are low-contrast on computed tomography (CT), often necessitating magnetic resonance imaging for accurate delineation. A new formulation of spacers (I-SPs) incorporates iodine to improve radiopacity and CT visualization. We characterized placement, stability, and plan quality of I-SPs compared to nonI-SPs. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with intact prostate cancer (n = 50) treated with I-SPs and photons were compared to randomly selected patients (n = 50) with nonI-SPs (photon or proton therapy). The I-SP was contoured on the planning CT and cone beam CTs at 3 timepoints: first, middle, and final treatment (n = 200 scans). I-SPs Hounsfield units (HU), volume, surface area (SA), centroid position relative to prostate centroid, and distance between prostate/rectum centroids were compared on the planning CTs between each cohort. I-SP changes were evaluated on cone beam CTs over courses of treatment. Dosimetric evaluations of plan quality and robustness were performed. I-SP was tested in a phantom to characterize its relative linear stopping power for protons. RESULTS I-SPs yielded a distinct visible contrast on planning CTs compared to nonI-SPs (HU 138 vs 12, P < .001), allowing delineation on CT alone. The delineated volume and SA of I-SPs were smaller than nonI-SPs (volume 8.9 vs 10.6 mL, P < .001; SA 28 vs 35 cm2, P < .001), yet relative spacer position and prostate-rectal separation were similar (P = .79). No significant change in HU, volume, SA, or relative position of the I-SPs hydrogel occurred over courses of treatment (all P > .1). Dosimetric analysis concluded there were no significant changes in plan quality or robustness for I-SPs compared to nonI-SPs. The I-SP relative linear stopping power was 1.018, necessitating HU override for proton planning. CONCLUSIONS I-SPs provide a manifest CT contrast, allowing for delineation on planning CT alone with no magnetic resonance imaging necessary. I-SPs radiopacity, size, and relative position remained stable over courses of treatment from 28 to 44 fractions. No changes in plan quality or robustness were seen comparing I-SPs and nonI-SPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Anurag Saraf
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program
| | | | - Ashraf Thabet
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Patrick Sutphin
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vaggers S, Rai BP, Chedgy ECP, de la Taille A, Somani BK. Polyethylene glycol-based hydrogel rectal spacers for prostate brachytherapy: a systematic review with a focus on technique. World J Urol 2021; 39:1769-1780. [PMID: 32840655 PMCID: PMC8217059 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03414-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiation dose to the rectum in prostate brachytherapy (PBT) can be reduced by the use of polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel spacers. This reduces the rate of rectal toxicity and allows dose escalation to the prostate. Our objectives were to provide an overview of technique for injection of a PEG hydrogel spacer, reduction in rectal dosimetry, gastrointestinal toxicity and potential complications. METHODS We systematically reviewed the role of PEG hydrogel spacers in PBT using the Cochrane and PRISMA methodology for all English-language articles from January 2013 to December 2019. Data was extracted for type of radiotherapy, number of patients, type of PEG-hydrogel used, mean prostate-rectum separation, rectal dosimetry, acute and late GI toxicity, procedure-related complications and the technique used for hydrogel insertion. RESULTS Nine studies (671 patients and 537 controls) met our inclusion criteria. Of these 4 used DuraSeal® and 5 used SpaceOAR®. The rectal spacing achieved varied between 7.7-16 mm. Failure of hydrogel insertion was seen only in 12 patients, mostly related to failure of hydrodissection in patients undergoing salvage PBT. Where reported, the rectal D2 cc was reduced by between 21.6 and 52.6% and the median rectal V75% cc was reduced by between 91.8-100%. Acute GI complications were mostly limited to grade 1 or 2 toxicity (n = 153, 33.7%) with low levels of grade 3 or 4 toxicity (n = 1, 0.22%). Procedure-related complications were limited to tenesmus (0.14%), rectal discomfort (1.19%), and bacterial prostatitis (0.44%). CONCLUSIONS PEG hydrogel spacers are safe to insert. Gel insertion is easy, fast and has a low rate of failure. These studies convincingly demonstrate a significant reduction in rectal dosimetry. Although the results of spacers in reducing rectal toxicity is promising, these need to be confirmed in prospective randomised trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Vaggers
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | - A. de la Taille
- Department of Urology, Robotic and Miniinvasive Surgery, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - B. K. Somani
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang C, Wu L, Li W, Fei J, Xu J, Chen S, Yan S, Wang X. An injectable double-crosslinking iodinated composite hydrogel as a potential radioprotective spacer with durable imaging function. J Mater Chem B 2021; 9:3346-3356. [PMID: 33881426 DOI: 10.1039/d0tb02953j] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer incidence among males worldwide. Radiotherapy can achieve similar oncological outcomes to those of radical prostatectomy. One concern is, however, radiation damage to the rectum because of the extreme proximity between the two organs. Inserting a biomaterial to separate the prostate and rectum is a promising strategy, and an injectable hydrogel is regarded to be the preferred spacer after screening of various materials. Nevertheless, there exist shortcomings for the currently available injectable hydrogel that cannot fully meet the unique requirements in clinical practice. In this work, a novel injectable hydrogel spacer based on carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC), aldehyde guar gum (AG), and aldehyde iohexol (DHQ) with an imaging function is fabricated. Contrast agent DHQ is chemically attached to CMC-AG network to form a double-crosslinking network to obtain a controlled degradation rate and high strength as well as durable CT imaging function. The hydrogel is injected subcutaneously into rats, where rapid gelation occurs and it serves as a hydrogel spacer. During the month-long in vivo studies, the spacer exhibits remarkable radiation dose attenuation and sustainable imaging function, as well as excellent toxicity profiles. This novel hydrogel shows excellent potential in the protection of critical organs during prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Wang
- College of Materials Science & Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, China.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Acute patient-reported bowel quality of life and rectal bleeding with the combination of prostate external beam radiation, low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost, and SpaceOAR. Brachytherapy 2020; 19:477-483. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
14
|
Letter to the editor regarding "Rectal spacing, prostate coverage, and periprocedural outcomes after hydrogel spacer injection during low-dose-rate brachytherapy implantation". Brachytherapy 2020; 19:554-555. [PMID: 32409127 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
15
|
Rectal spacing, prostate coverage, and periprocedural outcomes after hydrogel spacer injection during low-dose-rate brachytherapy implantation. Brachytherapy 2020; 19:228-233. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
16
|
What is the quality of hydrogel spacer insertions? and which patients will benefit? A literature review. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2020. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396919000979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractAim:To evaluate the quality of rectal hydrogel spacer (HS) insertions from literature in patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer. The secondary aim is to assess the benefit of HSs in patients with risk factors more likely to have rectal complications, such as non-conventional radiotherapy dose fractionations and high-risk disease.Method and materials:A literature search of peer-reviewed electronic articles was carried out using Boolean connectors and Medical Subject Headings in the databases. Databases searched included ScienceDirect, Medline and Cinahl. The articles were assessed using relevant critical appraisal skills programme tools.Results:From the 26 studies used, HS showed a clinically significant relative reduction in rectal planning dose volumes for both high- and low-risk prostate cancer patients in a range of radiotherapy treatment modalities including volumetric modulated arc therapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, intensity-modulated proton therapy, stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Spacer placements were successfully inserted in 99% of patients. However, rectal wall infiltration occurrence was 6% and ≥2 cm unsymmetrical placements in 2%.Findings:A spacer scoring system based on the HS symmetry has provided evidence of the quality of the position inserted, which was visually aided by T2-wieghted MRIs. Despite optimal HS placements ranging from 62 to 72%, HS had a clinically significant reduction of ≥25% in planned rectal V70 dose in 97% of patients.
Collapse
|
17
|
Qiao Y, Jagt T, Hoogeman M, Lelieveldt BPF, Staring M. Evaluation of an Open Source Registration Package for Automatic Contour Propagation in Online Adaptive Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy of Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1297. [PMID: 31828037 PMCID: PMC6890846 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Our goal was to investigate the performance of an open source deformable image registration package, elastix, for fast and robust contour propagation in the context of online-adaptive intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for prostate cancer. Methods: A planning and 7–10 repeat CT scans were available of 18 prostate cancer patients. Automatic contour propagation of repeat CT scans was performed using elastix and compared with manual delineations in terms of geometric accuracy and runtime. Dosimetric accuracy was quantified by generating IMPT plans using the propagated contours expanded with a 2 mm (prostate) and 3.5 mm margin (seminal vesicles and lymph nodes) and calculating dosimetric coverage based on the manual delineation. A coverage of V95% ≥ 98% (at least 98% of the target volumes receive at least 95% of the prescribed dose) was considered clinically acceptable. Results: Contour propagation runtime varied between 3 and 30 s for different registration settings. For the fastest setting, 83 in 93 (89.2%), 73 in 93 (78.5%), and 91 in 93 (97.9%) registrations yielded clinically acceptable dosimetric coverage of the prostate, seminal vesicles, and lymph nodes, respectively. For the prostate, seminal vesicles, and lymph nodes the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) was 0.87 ± 0.05, 0.63 ± 0.18, and 0.89 ± 0.03 and the mean surface distance (MSD) was 1.4 ± 0.5 mm, 2.0 ± 1.2 mm, and 1.5 ± 0.4 mm, respectively. Conclusion: With a dosimetric success rate of 78.5–97.9%, this software may facilitate online adaptive IMPT of prostate cancer using a fast, free and open implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuchuan Qiao
- The Division of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Thyrza Jagt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mischa Hoogeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt
- The Division of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Intelligent Systems Department, Faculty of EEMCS, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Marius Staring
- The Division of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Intelligent Systems Department, Faculty of EEMCS, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Marius Staring
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Atluri PS, Gannavarapu BS, Timmerman RD, Garant A, Hannan R, Folkert MR, Desai NB. Addition of Iodinated Contrast to Rectal Hydrogel Spacer to Facilitate MRI-Independent Target Delineation and Treatment Planning for Prostate Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 2019; 9:e528-e533. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
19
|
Draulans C, De Roover R, van der Heide UA, Haustermans K, Pos F, Smeenk RJ, De Boer H, Depuydt T, Kunze-Busch M, Isebaert S, Kerkmeijer L. Stereotactic body radiation therapy with optional focal lesion ablative microboost in prostate cancer: Topical review and multicenter consensus. Radiother Oncol 2019; 140:131-142. [PMID: 31276989 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Revised: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer (PCa) is gaining interest by the recent publication of the first phase III trials on prostate SBRT and the promising results of many other phase II trials. Before long term results became available, the major concern for implementing SBRT in PCa in daily clinical practice was the potential risk of late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. A number of recently published trials, including late outcome and toxicity data, contributed to the growing evidence for implementation of SBRT for PCa in daily clinical practice. However, there exists substantial variability in delivering SBRT for PCa. The aim of this topical review is to present a number of prospective trials and retrospective analyses of SBRT in the treatment of PCa. We focus on the treatment strategies and techniques used in these trials. In addition, recent literature on a simultaneous integrated boost to the tumor lesion, which could create an additional value in the SBRT treatment of PCa, was described. Furthermore, we discuss the multicenter consensus of the FLAME consortium on SBRT for PCa with a focal boost to the macroscopic intraprostatic tumor nodule(s).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cédric Draulans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Robin De Roover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Floris Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Robert Jan Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Hans De Boer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Martina Kunze-Busch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Sofie Isebaert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Linda Kerkmeijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sanmamed N, Glicksman RM, Helou J, Chung P, Berlin A. Case series illustrating the synergistic use of hydrogel spacer and MR-guidance to increase the radiotherapeutic index for localized prostate cancer. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2019; 11:22-25. [PMID: 32095546 PMCID: PMC7033779 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Revised: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Polyethylene glycol hydrogel spacer allows radiotherapy in challenging scenarios. Polyethylene glycol hydrogel material properties may limit broader applicability. MRI-guided brachytherapy unique scenario to use PEG without compromising prostate resolution.
Background The risk of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity may limit the use of curative-intent radical radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PCa) in circumstances where morbidity of treatment may exceed an acceptable threshold. Rectal spacers are used to expand the distance between the anterior rectal wall and the prostate, consequently sparing the rectum from the high-dose region. Case presentations We report three clinical scenarios of PCa patients treated at our institution, where risk of RT-associated rectal toxicity may be increased: inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), salvage brachytherapy (BT) after previous external beam RT (EBRT), and tailored dose-escalation with focal BT to the gross tumor volume followed by stereotactic body RT. Prior to RT, a polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel spacer was successfully placed in all cases. Treatment comprised magnetic resonance (MR) guided high dose-rate BT ± EBRT. All patients completed treatment uneventfully, without any significant GI toxicity at last follow-up. Conclusions These cases illustrate the utility of PEG hydrogel spacer, where concerns of radiation induced toxicity may have previously limited the application of radiotherapy. The synergistic use of these novel devices together with MR-guided BT may expand the indications and therapeutic index of curative-intent RT-based treatments, while minimizing the risks of GI toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noelia Sanmamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada.,Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada
| | | | - Joelle Helou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada.,Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Peter Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada.,Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada.,Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada.,Techna Institute, University Health Network, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hoe V, Yao HHI, Huang JG, Guerrieri M. Abscess formation following hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer radiotherapy: a rare complication. BMJ Case Rep 2019; 12:12/10/e229143. [PMID: 31586950 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2018-229143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Periprostatic abscess is a rare complication of hydrogel spacers in radiotherapy for prostate cancer. We present the case of a 61-year-old man who developed this condition. Abdominopelvis CT scan revealed a 54×35×75 mm collection in the location of the SpaceOAR, for which ultrasound-guided transperineal percutaneous drainage of the periprostatic abscess was performed. The patient remains well with serial CT scans showing near resolution of the collection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Henry Han-I Yao
- Department of Urology, Footscray Hospital, Footscray, Victoria, Australia
| | - James G Huang
- Department of Urology, Footscray Hospital, Footscray, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mario Guerrieri
- Radiation Oncology, Genesiscare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Afkhami Ardekani M, Ghaffari H. Optimization of prostate brachytherapy techniques with polyethylene glycol-based hydrogel spacers: A systematic review. Brachytherapy 2019; 19:13-23. [PMID: 31542390 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this overview was to critically evaluate the effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based hydrogel spacers during prostate brachytherapy with regard to dosimetric and clinical benefits, as well as procedure-related toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic search in the PubMed database was performed. RESULTS A total of 12 studies, involving 615 patients with PEG hydrogel injection, were included. Overall, patients well tolerated the implantation of PEG hydrogel spacers with an excellent safety profile. However, although there were some procedure-related complications, rates of these complications were very rare. Toxicities related to the spacer were limited to Grade 1 rectal discomfort and pain (9/615 patients), Grade 2 rectal ulceration (1 in 615 patients), perineal abscess (1 in 615 patients), and bacterial prostatitis (2/615 patients) according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 grading scheme. The application of PEG hydrogel spacers significantly reduced radiation doses to the rectum during prostate brachytherapy in the different setting. Although there was no prospective randomized clinical trial, retrospective studies showed that reducing rectal doses by the implantation of PEG hydrogel may result in an improvement in rectal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS The insertion of hydrogel spacers is safe, resulting in a significant decrease in rectal doses. This may lead to a reduction in rectal or gastrointestinal toxicity. Prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm the clinical impact of rectal dosimetric improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahdieh Afkhami Ardekani
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Para-Medicine, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar-Abbas, Iran
| | - Hamed Ghaffari
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Improving rectal dosimetry for patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer undergoing combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy with hydrogel space. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2019; 11:8-13. [PMID: 30911304 PMCID: PMC6431099 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2019.82836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report on rectal dosimetric and toxicity outcomes of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing combined high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without hydrogel spacer (HS) insertion. Material and methods A total of 97 patients were analyzed in this study, with 32 patients (33%) who had HS insertion compared with a preceding group of 65 patients (67%) without HS. HS safety, the dosimetric effects on organs at risk (rectal, urethral, penile bulb, and bladder) as well as gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicity were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results The median prostate-rectal separation achieved with HS was 10 mm (range, 5-14 mm). There were no post-operative complications following HS insertion. Patients with HS had significantly lower radiation dose to the rectum across all rectal dose volumes from rV30 to rV80, whether in absolute volume (cc) or as percentage of contoured OAR (p < 0.001). There was also significantly less acute > grade 1 GI toxicity (12.5% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.05) and a trend towards less late grade 1 GI toxicity (0% vs. 7.7%; p = 0.11) in the HS group compared to the non-HS group. Conclusions Insertion of HS in prostate cancer patients receiving combined HDR and EBRT is safe and has resulted in a significant radiation dose reduction to the rectum, resulting in significantly less acute GI toxicity and a trend towards less late GI toxicity.
Collapse
|
24
|
Vanneste BG, Buettner F, Pinkawa M, Lambin P, Hoffmann AL. Ano-rectal wall dose-surface maps localize the dosimetric benefit of hydrogel rectum spacers in prostate cancer radiotherapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:17-24. [PMID: 30456317 PMCID: PMC6234617 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To evaluate spatial differences in dose distributions of the ano-rectal wall (ARW) using dose-surface maps (DSMs) between prostate cancer patients receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy with and without implantable rectum spacer (IMRT+IRS; IMRT-IRS, respectively), and to correlate this with late gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicities using validated spatial and non-spatial normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. MATERIALS AND METHODS For 26 patients DSMs of the ARW were generated. From the DSMs various shape-based dose measures were calculated at different dose levels: lateral extent, longitudinal extent, and eccentricity. The contiguity of the ARW dose distribution was assessed by the contiguous-DSH (cDSH). Predicted complication rates between IMRT+IRS and IMRT-IRS plans were assessed using a spatial NTCP model and compared against a non-spatial NTCP model. RESULTS Dose surface maps are generated for prostate radiotherapy using an IRS. Lateral extent, longitudinal extent and cDSH were significantly lower in IMRT+IRS than for IMRT-IRS at high-dose levels. Largest significant differences were observed for cDSH at dose levels >50 Gy, followed by lateral extent at doses >57 Gy, and longitudinal extent in anterior and superior-inferior directions. Significant decreases (p = 0.01) in median rectal and anal NTCPs (respectively, Gr 2 late rectal bleeding and subjective sphincter control) were predicted when using an IRS. CONCLUSIONS Local-dose effects are predicted to be significantly reduced by an IRS. The spatial NTCP model predicts a significant decrease in Gr 2 late rectal bleeding and subjective sphincter control. Dose constraints can be improved for current clinical treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | - Philippe Lambin
- The D-Lab, GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Aswin L. Hoffmann
- MAASTRO Clinic, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Institute of Radiooncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
SpaceOAR to improve dosimetric outcomes for monotherapy high-dose-rate prostate implantation in a patient with ulcerative colitis. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10:577-582. [PMID: 30662483 PMCID: PMC6335554 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.81001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is an attractive option for patients receiving definitive radiation therapy for prostate cancer with decreased overall dose to the pelvis. However, ulcerative colitis increases rectal toxicity risk and may be a contraindication. A synthetic hydrogel, SpaceOAR (Augmentix Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), can facilitate the use of HDR brachytherapy for patients where rectal toxicity is a limiting factor. SpaceOAR gel (13.19 cc) was utilized in a monotherapy HDR prostate treatment with Ir-192 under transrectal ultrasound guidance, with the intention of decreasing rectal dose. SpaceOAR gel was inserted transperineally into the patient 18 days prior to the procedure. The HDR brachytherapy procedure was tolerated without incident. All planning constraints were met, and the following dosimetry was achieved: Prostate - V100% = 97.3%, V150% = 35%, V200% = 14.5%; Urethra - V118% = 0%; Rectum - D2 cc = 51.6%, V75% = 0 cc. The rectum-catheter spacing was on average between 6-8 mm. Average spacing for our 10 most recent patients without SpaceOAR was 3 mm. SpaceOAR did not hinder or distort ultrasound imaging or increase treatment time. SpaceOAR successfully increases catheter-rectal wall spacing and decreases rectal dose due to improved planning capabilities, while decreasing the likelihood of rectal perforation. One application of this tool is presented to mitigate potential toxicities associated with ulcerative colitis. At five months, one week, and one day follow-up, the patient reported no bowel issues following HDR brachytherapy.
Collapse
|
26
|
Vanneste BGL, van De Beek K, Lutgens L, Lambin P. Implantation of a biodegradable rectum balloon implant: tips, Tricks and Pitfalls. Int Braz J Urol 2018; 43:1033-1042. [PMID: 28338306 PMCID: PMC5734065 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: A rectum balloon implant (RBI) is a new device to spare rectal structures during prostate cancer radiotherapy. The theoretical advantages of a RBI are to reduce the high radiation dose to the anterior rectum wall, the possibility of a post-implant correction, and their predetermined shape with consequent predictable position. Objective: To describe, step-by-step, our mini-invasive technique for hands-free transperineal implantation of a RBI before start of radiotherapy treatment. Materials and Methods: We provide step-by-step instructions for optimization of the transperineal implantation procedure performed by urologists and/or radiation oncologists experienced with prostate brachytherapy and the use of the real-time bi-plane transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) probe. A RBI was performed in 15 patients with localised prostate cancer. Perioperative side-effects were reported. Results: We provide ‘tips and tricks’ for optimizing the procedure and proper positioning of the RBI. Please watch the animation, see video in https://vimeo.com/205852376/789df4fae4. The side-effects included mild discomfort to slight pain at the perineal region in 8 out of 15 patients. Seven patients (47%) had no complaints at all. Two patients developed redness of the skin, where prompt antibiotic regimen was started with no further sequelae. One patient revealed a temporary urine retention, which resolved in a few hours following conservative treatment. Further no perioperative complications occurred. Conclusion: This paper describes in detail the implantation procedure for an RBI. It is a feasible, safe and very well-tolerated procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben G L Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Kees van De Beek
- Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Ludy Lutgens
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Philippe Lambin
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wu SY, Boreta L, Wu A, Cheung JP, Cunha JAM, Shinohara K, Chang AJ. Improved rectal dosimetry with the use of SpaceOAR during high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2018; 17:259-264. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2017] [Revised: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
28
|
Placement of an absorbable rectal hydrogel spacer in patients undergoing low-dose-rate brachytherapy with palladium-103. Brachytherapy 2017; 17:251-258. [PMID: 29241706 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Revised: 11/10/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Rates of rectal toxicity after low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer are dependent on rectal dose, which is associated with rectal distance from prostate and implanted seeds. Placement of a hydrogel spacer between the prostate and rectum has proven to reduce the volume of the rectum exposed to higher radiation dose levels in the setting of external beam radiotherapy. We present our findings with placing a rectal hydrogel spacer in patients following LDR brachytherapy, and we further assess the impact of this placement on dosimetry and acute rectal toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between January 2016 and April 2017, 74 patients had placement of a hydrogel spacer, immediately following a Pd-103 seed-implant procedure. Brachytherapy was delivered as follows: as a monotherapy to 26 (35%) patients; as part of planned combination therapy with external beam radiotherapy to 40 (54%) patients; or as a salvage monotherapy to eight (11%) patients. Postoperative MRI was used to assess separation achieved with rectal spacer. Acute toxicity was assessed retrospectively using Radiation Oncology Therapy Group radiation toxicity grading system. Rectal dosimetry was compared with a consecutive cohort of 136 patients treated with seed implantation at our institution without a spacer, using a 2-tailed paired Student's t test (p < 0.05 for statistical significance). RESULTS On average, 11.2-mm (SD 3.3) separation was achieved between the prostate and the rectum. The resultant mean rectal volume receiving 100% of prescribed dose (V100%), dose to 1 cc of rectum (D1cc), and dose to 2 cc of rectum (D2cc) were 0 (SD 0.05 cc), 25.3% (SD 12.7), and 20.5% (SD 9.9), respectively. All rectal dosimetric parameters improved significantly for the cohort with spacer placement as compared with the nonspacer cohort. Mean prostate volume, prostate V100 and dose to 90% of gland (D90) were 29.3 cc (SD 12.4), 94.0% (SD 3.81), and 112.4% (SD 12.0), respectively. Urethral D20, D5cc, and D1cc were 122.0% (SD 17.27), 133.8% (SD 22.8), and 144.0% (SD 25.4), respectively. After completing all treatments, at the time of first the followup, 7 patients reported acute rectal toxicity-6 experiencing Grade 1 rectal discomfort and 1 (with preexisting hemorrhoids) experiencing Grade 1 bleeding. CONCLUSIONS Injection of rectal spacer is feasible in the post-LDR brachytherapy setting and reduces dose to the rectum with minimal toxicity. Prostate and urethral dosimetries do not appear to be affected by the placement of a spacer. Further studies with long-term followup are warranted to assess the impact on reduction of late rectal toxicity.
Collapse
|
29
|
Padmanabhan R, Pinkawa M, Song DY. Hydrogel spacers in prostate radiotherapy: a promising approach to decrease rectal toxicity. Future Oncol 2017; 13:2697-2708. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
High-dose radiation is a well-established method of treatment for prostate cancer. The main limiting structure for dose escalation is the rectum. The risk of rectal toxicity is related to dose received by the rectum. Several strategies for reducing dose to rectum have been explored; these include endorectal balloons as well as injection of rectal spacers like hydrogels. They create greater distance between rectal wall and prostate to confer a dosimetric advantage to the rectum. Early clinical studies with hydrogels have shown favorable outcomes. A low incidence of major procedural adverse effects with hydrogel use has been reported and it is well tolerated by patients. Hydrogel holds promise in establishing itself as an adjunct to standard of care in prostate radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjani Padmanabhan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, INOVA Health System Fairfax, 3300 Gallows Road, Falls Church, VA 22042, USA
| | - Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52057 Aachen, Germany
| | - Daniel Y Song
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 401 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vanneste BGL, van Wijk Y, Lutgens LC, Van Limbergen EJ, van Lin EN, van de Beek K, Lambin P, Hoffmann AL. Dynamics of rectal balloon implant shrinkage in prostate VMAT : Influence on anorectal dose and late rectal complication risk. Strahlenther Onkol 2017; 194:31-40. [PMID: 29038832 PMCID: PMC5752748 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-017-1222-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effect of a shrinking rectal balloon implant (RBI) on the anorectal dose and complication risk during the course of moderately hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy. METHODS In 15 patients with localized prostate cancer, an RBI was implanted. A weekly kilovolt cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was acquired to measure the dynamics of RBI volume and prostate-rectum separation. The absolute anorectal volume encompassed by the 2 Gy equieffective 75 Gy isodose (V75Gy) was recalculated as well as the mean anorectal dose. The increase in estimated risk of grade 2-3 late rectal bleeding (LRB) between the start and end of treatment was predicted using nomograms. The observed acute and late toxicities were evaluated. RESULTS A significant shrinkage of RBI volumes was observed, with an average volume of 70.4% of baseline at the end of the treatment. Although the prostate-rectum separation significantly decreased over time, it remained at least 1 cm. No significant increase in V75Gy of the anorectum was observed, except in one patient whose RBI had completely deflated in the third week of treatment. No correlation between mean anorectal dose and balloon deflation was found. The increase in predicted LRB risk was not significant, except in the one patient whose RBI completely deflated. The observed toxicities confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS Despite significant decrease in RBI volume the high-dose rectal volume and the predicted LRB risk were unaffected due to a persistent spacing between the prostate and the anterior rectal wall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben G L Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Y van Wijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - L C Lutgens
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E J Van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E N van Lin
- Radiotherapy Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, Troisdorf, Germany
| | - K van de Beek
- Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - P Lambin
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A L Hoffmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Serrano NA, Kalman NS, Anscher MS. Reducing rectal injury in men receiving prostate cancer radiation therapy: current perspectives. Cancer Manag Res 2017; 9:339-350. [PMID: 28814898 PMCID: PMC5546182 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s118781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Dose escalation is now the standard of care for the treatment of prostate cancer with radiation therapy. However, the rectum tends to be the dose-limiting structure when treating prostate cancer, given its close proximity. Early and late toxicities can occur when the rectum receives large doses of radiation therapy. New technologies allow for prevention of these toxicities. In this review, we examine the evidence that supports various dose constraints employed to prevent these rectal injuries from occurring. We also examine the use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and how this compares to older radiation therapy techniques that allow for further sparing of the rectum during a radiation therapy course. We then review the literature on endorectal balloons and the effects of their daily use throughout a radiation therapy course. Tissue spacers are now being investigated in greater detail; these devices are injected into the rectoprostatic fascia to physically increase the distance between the prostate and the anterior rectal wall. Last, we review the use of systemic drugs, specifically statin medications and antihypertensives, as well as their impact on rectal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas A Serrano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University - Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA
| | - Noah S Kalman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University - Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA
| | - Mitchell S Anscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Chung H, Polf J, Badiyan S, Biagioli M, Fernandez D, Latifi K, Wilder R, Mehta M, Chuong M. Rectal dose to prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy with or without rectal spacer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017; 18:32-39. [PMID: 28291917 PMCID: PMC5689902 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2016] [Accepted: 09/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a spacer inserted in the prerectal space could reduce modeled rectal dose and toxicity rates for patients with prostate cancer treated in silico with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. A total of 20 patients were included in this study who received photon therapy (12 with rectal spacer (DuraSeal™ gel) and 8 without). Two PBS treatment plans were retrospectively created for each patient using the following beam arrangements: (1) lateral-opposed (LAT) fields and (2) left and right anterior oblique (LAO/RAO) fields. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were generated for the prostate, rectum, bladder, and right and left femoral heads. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for ≥grade 2 rectal toxicity was calculated using the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model and compared between patients with and without the rectal spacer. A significantly lower mean rectal DVH was achieved in patients with rectal spacer compared to those without. For LAT plans, the mean rectal V70 with and without rectal spacer was 4.19 and 13.5%, respectively. For LAO/RAO plans, the mean rectal V70 with and without rectal spacer was 5.07 and 13.5%, respectively. No significant differences were found in any rectal dosimetric parameters between the LAT and the LAO/RAO plans generated with the rectal spacers. We found that ≥ 9 mm space resulted in a significant decrease in NTCP modeled for ≥grade 2 rectal toxicity. Rectal spacers can significantly decrease modeled rectal dose and predicted ≥grade 2 rectal toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated in silico with PBS. A minimum of 9 mm separation between the prostate and anterior rectal wall yields the largest benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heeteak Chung
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MarylandBaltimore School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Jerimy Polf
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MarylandBaltimore School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Shahed Badiyan
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MarylandBaltimore School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Matthew Biagioli
- Department of Radiation OncologyFlorida Hospital Cancer InstituteOrlandoFLUSA
| | - Daniel Fernandez
- Department of Radiation OncologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer CenterTampaFLUSA
| | - Kujtim Latifi
- Department of Radiation OncologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer CenterTampaFLUSA
| | - Richard Wilder
- Department of Radiation OncologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer CenterTampaFLUSA
| | - Minesh Mehta
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MarylandBaltimore School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Michael Chuong
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MarylandBaltimore School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy: What Do Clinicians Have to Know? BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2016; 2016:6829875. [PMID: 28116302 PMCID: PMC5225325 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6829875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Revised: 10/18/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PC) has steadily evolved over the last decades, with improving biochemical disease-free survival. Recently population based research also revealed an association between overall survival and doses ≥ 75.6 Gray (Gy) in men with intermediate- and high-risk PC. Examples of improved RT techniques are image-guided RT, intensity-modulated RT, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and stereotactic ablative body RT, which could facilitate further dose escalation. Brachytherapy is an internal form of RT that also developed substantially. New devices such as rectum spacers and balloons have been developed to spare rectal structures. Newer techniques like protons and carbon ions have the intrinsic characteristics maximising the dose on the tumour while minimising the effect on the surrounding healthy tissue, but clinical data are needed for confirmation in randomised phase III trials. Furthermore, it provides an overview of an important discussion issue in PC treatment between urologists and radiation oncologists: the comparison between radical prostatectomy and RT. Current literature reveals that all possible treatment modalities have the same cure rate, but a different toxicity pattern. We recommend proposing the possible different treatment modalities with their own advantages and side-effects to the individual patient. Clinicians and patients should make treatment decisions together (shared decision-making) while using patient decision aids.
Collapse
|
34
|
Who will benefit most from hydrogel rectum spacer implantation in prostate cancer radiotherapy? A model-based approach for patient selection. Radiother Oncol 2016; 121:118-123. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2016] [Revised: 08/05/2016] [Accepted: 08/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
35
|
Pinkawa M, Berneking V, König L, Frank D, Bretgeld M, Eble MJ. Hydrogel injection reduces rectal toxicity after radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2016; 193:22-28. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-016-1040-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Accepted: 08/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
36
|
Picardi C, Rouzaud M, Kountouri M, Lestrade L, Vallée JP, Caparrotti F, Dubouloz A, Miralbell R, Zilli T. Impact of hydrogel spacer injections on interfraction prostate motion during prostate cancer radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 2016; 55:834-8. [PMID: 26796870 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2015.1128118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background The dosimetric advantage of prostate-rectum spacers to displace the anterior rectal wall outside of the high-dose radiation regions has been clearly established in prostate cancer radiotherapy (RT). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of hydrogel spacer (HS) in the interfraction prostate motion in patients undergoing RT for prostate cancer. Material and methods Twenty prostate cancer patients implanted with three fiducial markers (FM) with (n = 10) or without (n = 10) HS were analyzed. Displacements between the prostate isocenter based on the FM's position and the bony anatomy were quantified in the left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI) axes by offline analyses of 122 cone beam computed tomography scans. Group systematic (M), systematic (Σ) and random (σ) setup errors were determined. Results In patients with or without HS, the overall mean interfraction prostate displacements were 0.4 versus -0.4 mm (p = 0.0001), 0.6 versus 0.6 mm (p = 0.85), and -0.6 mm versus -0.3 mm (p = 0.48) for the LR, AP, and SI axes, respectively. Prostate displacements >5 mm in the AP and SI directions were similar for both groups. No differences in M, Σ and σ setup errors were observed in the three axes between HS + or HS- patients. Conclusions HS implantation does not significantly influence the interfraction prostate motion in patients treated with RT for prostate cancer. The major expected benefit of HS is a reduction of the high-dose levels to the rectal wall without influence in prostate immobilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Picardi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Michel Rouzaud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Melpomeni Kountouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Laetitia Lestrade
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jean Paul Vallée
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Francesca Caparrotti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Angèle Dubouloz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Raymond Miralbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Comparative study of late rectal toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy: With or without supplemental external beam radiotherapy. Brachytherapy 2016; 15:435-441. [PMID: 27180124 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2016] [Revised: 03/14/2016] [Accepted: 04/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Supplemental external beam radiation therapy (sEBRT) is often prescribed in men undergoing low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy. A population of patients was analyzed to assess the effect of sEBRT on late rectal toxicity. It was hypothesized that sEBRT + LDR would be associated with a higher risk of late rectal toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS This retrospective cohort study examined LDR brachytherapy patients, treated with or without sEBRT, with a minimum of 5-year followup. Longitudinal assessments were evaluated using the computerized patient record system. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis. RESULTS Median followup was 7.5 years for 245 patients from 2004 to 2007. sEBRT was administered to 33.5%. Followup beyond 5 years was available for 89%. Overall rates of Grade ≥2 and ≥3 rectal toxicities were 6.9% and 2.9%, respectively. The risk of Grade ≥2 rectal toxicity was 2.8-fold higher for patients receiving sEBRT (95% confidence interval: 1.1-7.2; p = 0.02). The risk of Grade ≥3 rectal toxicity was 11.9-fold higher for patients who received sEBRT (1.5-97.4, 95% confidence interval; p = 0.003). Six of seven patients with a Grade ≥3 rectal toxicity received sEBRT, including one who required an abdominoperineal resection. Median post-LDR D90, V150, V200, and R100 values were 103.3%, 59.4%, 30.1%, and 0.5 cc. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of LDR brachytherapy patients with high rates of followup, sEBRT + LDR was associated with significantly higher risk of Grade ≥2 and ≥3 late rectal toxicity. This analysis supports previous findings and maintains concern about the supplemental use of external beam radiation therapy with LDR brachytherapy while its benefit for tumor control has yet to be prospectively validated.
Collapse
|
38
|
Pinkawa M. Current role of spacers for prostate cancer radiotherapy. World J Clin Oncol 2015; 6:189-193. [PMID: 26677428 PMCID: PMC4675900 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v6.i6.189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2015] [Revised: 08/12/2015] [Accepted: 08/31/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is an established curative treatment method for prostate cancer. Optimal tumor control rates can only be achieved with high local doses, associated with a considerable risk of rectal toxicity. Apart from already widely adapted technical advances, as intensity-modulated radiation therapy, the application of spacers placed between the prostate and rectum has been increasingly used in the last years. Biodegradable spacers, including hydrogel, hyaluronic acid, collagen or an implantable balloon, can be injected or inserted in a short procedure under transrectal ultrasound guidance via a transperineal approach. A distance of about 1.0-1.5 cm is usually achieved between the rectum and prostate, excluding the rectal wall from the high isodoses. Several studies have shown well tolerated injection procedures and treatments. Apart from considerable reduction of rectal irradiation, a prospective randomized trial demonstrated a reduction of rectal toxicity after hydrogel injection in men undergoing prostate image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy. The results are encouraging for continuing evaluation in dose escalation, hypofractionation, stereotactic radiotherapy or re-irradiation trials in the future.
Collapse
|
39
|
Vanneste BGL, Van De Voorde L, de Ridder RJ, Van Limbergen EJ, Lambin P, van Lin EN. Chronic radiation proctitis: tricks to prevent and treat. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015; 30:1293-303. [PMID: 26198994 PMCID: PMC4575375 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2289-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/13/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to give an overview of the measures used to prevent chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) and to provide an algorithm for the treatment of CRP. METHODS Medical literature databases including PubMed and Medline were screened and critically analyzed for relevance in the scope of our purpose. RESULTS CRP is a relatively frequent late side effect (5-20%) and mainly dependent on the dose and volume of irradiated rectum. Radiation treatment (RT) techniques to prevent CRP are constantly improving thanks to image-guided RT and intensity-modulated RT. Also, newer techniques like protons and new devices such as rectum spacers and balloons have been developed to spare rectal structures. Biopsies do not contribute to diagnosing CRP and should be avoided because of the risk of severe rectal wall damage, such as necrosis and fistulas. There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of CRP. A variety of possibilities is available and includes topical and oral agents, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and endoscopic interventions. CONCLUSIONS CRP has a natural history of improving over time, even without treatment. This is important to take into account when considering these treatments: first be conservative (topical and oral agents) and be aware that invasive treatments can be very toxic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben G L Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Lien Van De Voorde
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier J de Ridder
- Department of Gastroenterology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Evert J Van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe Lambin
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Emile N van Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
A review of rectal toxicity following permanent low dose-rate prostate brachytherapy and the potential value of biodegradable rectal spacers. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2015; 18:96-103. [PMID: 25687401 DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2015.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2014] [Revised: 12/02/2014] [Accepted: 12/10/2014] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Permanent radioactive seed implantation provides highly effective treatment for prostate cancer that typically includes multidisciplinary collaboration between urologists and radiation oncologists. Low dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy offers excellent tumor control rates and has equivalent rates of rectal toxicity when compared with external beam radiotherapy. Owing to its proximity to the anterior rectal wall, a small portion of the rectum is often exposed to high doses of ionizing radiation from this procedure. Although rare, some patients develop transfusion-dependent rectal bleeding, ulcers or fistulas. These complications occasionally require permanent colostomy and thus can significantly impact a patient's quality of life. Aside from proper technique, a promising strategy has emerged that can help avoid these complications. By injecting biodegradable materials behind Denonviller's fascia, brachytherpists can increase the distance between the rectum and the radioactive sources to significantly decrease the rectal dose. This review summarizes the progress in this area and its applicability for use in combination with permanent LDR brachytherapy.
Collapse
|
41
|
Mok G, Benz E, Vallee JP, Miralbell R, Zilli T. Optimization of radiation therapy techniques for prostate cancer with prostate-rectum spacers: a systematic review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 90:278-88. [PMID: 25304788 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2014] [Revised: 05/12/2014] [Accepted: 06/18/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Dose-escalated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer improves disease control but is also associated with worse rectal toxicity. A spacer placed between the prostate and rectum can be used to displace the anterior rectal wall outside of the high-dose radiation regions and potentially minimize radiation-induced rectal toxicity. This systematic review focuses on the published data regarding the different types of commercially available prostate-rectum spacers. Dosimetric results and preliminary clinical data using prostate-rectum spacers in patients with localized prostate cancer treated by curative radiation therapy are compared and discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary Mok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Intégré de Cancérologie de Laval, Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Laval, Laval, Québec, Canada; Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology, and Nuclear Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Eileen Benz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Paul Vallee
- Department of Radiology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Raymond Miralbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|