Spatial dosimetric sensitivity of contouring uncertainties in gynecological 3D-based brachytherapy

Effects of Interfraction Dose Variations of Target and Organs at Risk on Clinical Outcomes in High Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer

Meeting dose prescription is critical to control tumors in radiation therapy. Interfraction dose variations (IDVs) from the prescribed dose in high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR) would cause the target dose to deviate from the prescription but their clinical effect has not been widely discussed in the literature. Our previous study found that IDVs followed a left-skewed distribution. The clinical effect of the IDVs in 100 cervical cancer HDR patients will be addressed in this paper. An in-house Monte Carlo (MC) program was used to simulate clinical outcomes by convolving published tumor dose response curves with IDV distributions. The optimal dose and probability of risk-free local control (RFLC) were calculated using the utility model. The IDVs were well-fitted by the left-skewed Beta distribution, which caused a 3.99% decrease in local control probability and a 1.80% increase in treatment failure. Utility with respect to IDV uncertainty increased the RFLC probability by 6.70% and predicted an optimal dose range of 83 Gy-91 Gy EQD2. It was also found that a 10 Gy dose escalation would not affect toxicity. In conclusion, HRCTV IDV uncertainty reduced LC probabilities and increased treatment failure rates. A dose escalation may help mitigate such effects.

Statistical Analysis of Interfraction Dose Variations of High-Risk Clinical Target Volume and Organs at Risk for Cervical Cancer High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy

Purpose

High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for cervical cancer treatment includes significant uncertainties. The aim of this study was to quantify the interfraction dosimetric variation (IDV) of the high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) from the prescribed dose and the corresponding effect on organ-at-risk (OAR) dose based on a comprehensive statistical analysis.

Methods and Materials

Fifty patients with cervical cancer treated with high-dose-rate intracavity brachytherapy from October 2019 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The OARs of interest were the rectum, bladder, sigmoid, and bowel. The dosimetric parameters evaluated for all patients was the dose absorbed by 90% of the HRCTV ( D 90 ) and the dose absorbed by 0.1 ( D 0.1 c c ) and 2 cm3 ( D 2 c c ) of each respective OAR. The HRCTV variations were from the prescribed dose and the OAR variations were from the corresponding tolerance dose. Distribution fitting of the HRCTV variations was determined to quantify the IDV. Comparative statistics of the HRCTV variations with the OAR variations were conducted to determine correlations.

Results

The mean HRCTV variation from the prescribed dose was -2.53% ± 8.74%. The HRCTV variations and OAR variations showed moderate to weak linear correlations despite the variations being relative to each other, with the bladder D 2 c c having the strongest correlation. There was a 30.0% (±2.62%, 95% confidence interval) probability of underdosing the HRCTV (-5% variation from prescription) and a 23.3% (±2.62%, 95% confidence interval) probability of overdosing the HRCTV (+5% variation from prescription). This tendency to underdose the HRCTV was a consequence of HRCTV IDV not being normally distributed.

Conclusions

HRCTV dosimetric variations and OAR variations were complexly correlated with the bladder D 2 c c having the strongest correlation. HRCTV IDV was best described as a left-skewed distribution that indicates a tendency of underdosing the HRCTV. The clinical significance of such dose variations is expected and will be further investigated.

Dose planning variations related to delineation variations in MRI-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer

PURPOSE

To examine the variability in prescribed dose due to contouring variations in intracavitary image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer. To identify correlations between dosimetric outcomes and delineation uncertainty metrics.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A data set from an EMBRACE sub-study on contouring uncertainties was used, consisting of magnetic resonance images of six patients with cervical cancer delineated by 10 experienced observers (target volumes and organs at risk). Two gold standard contours were generated, an expert consensus and the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation. Plans were individually optimised to all of the contour sets (12 in total). Plans were applied to the gold standard contour sets, and dose volume histogram parameters including D₉₀, D₉₈ and D_2cm³ were determined. The variability between plans was assessed. Dose volume histogram parameters and delineation uncertainty metrics were correlated using the Spearman's non-parametric rank correlation.

RESULTS

There is a dosimetric variability between observers, patients and the gold standard contour used for analysis. Approximately 3 Gy D₉₀ EQD2₁₀ variability (SD) was observed for the CTVHR and 1.2-3.6 Gy D_2cm³ EQD2₃ for the organs at risk. The maximum geometric dimensions of the delineations are most commonly correlated with dosimetry changes. Although the correlations are similar across gold standards, the direction of these correlations differs, indicating that the dosimetric outcomes are dependent on the contour that the plan is optimised to.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the dosimetric differences interobserver uncertainty in contouring can have for cervical cancer brachytherapy. The importance of carefully choosing a gold standard from which to benchmark is reiterated.

Uncertainties in volume delineation in radiation oncology: A systematic review and recommendations for future studies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Volume delineation is a well-recognised potential source of error in radiotherapy. Whilst it is important to quantify the degree of interobserver variability (IOV) in volume delineation, the resulting impact on dosimetry and clinical outcomes is a more relevant endpoint. We performed a literature review of studies evaluating IOV in target volume and organ-at-risk (OAR) delineation in order to analyse these with respect to the metrics used, reporting of dosimetric consequences, and use of statistical tests.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Medline and Pubmed databases were queried for relevant articles using keywords. We included studies published in English between 2000 and 2014 with more than two observers.

RESULTS

119 studies were identified covering all major tumour sites. CTV (n=47) and GTV (n=38) were most commonly contoured. Median number of participants and data sets were 7 (3-50) and 9 (1-132) respectively. There was considerable heterogeneity in the use of metrics and methods of analysis. Statistical analysis of results was reported in 68% (n=81) and dosimetric consequences in 21% (n=25) of studies.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of consistency in conducting and reporting analyses from IOV studies. We suggest a framework to use for future studies evaluating IOV.