Transrectal ultrasound for image-guided adaptive brachytherapy in cervix cancer – An alternative to MRI for target definition?

Individual curved-needle interstitial template created using three-dimensional printing for brachytherapy for distal parauterine tumor recurrence

BACKGROUND

Achieving a clinically acceptable dose distribution with commercial vaginal applicators for brachytherapy of recurrent parauterine tumors is challenging. However, the application of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology in brachytherapy has been widely acknowledged and can improve clinical treatment outcomes.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to introduce an individual curved-needle interstitial template (ICIT) created using 3D printing technology for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy with interstitial treatment to provide a clinically feasible approach to distal parauterine and vaginal cuff tumors. The entire workflow, including the design, optimization, and application, is presented.

METHODS

Ten patients with pelvic cancer recurrence were examined at our center. The vaginal topography was filled with gauze strips soaked in developer solution, and images were obtained using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Curved needle paths were designed, and ICITs were 3D-printed according to the high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) and vaginal filling model. The dose and volume histogram parameters of the HRCTV (V100, V200, D90, and D98) and organs at risk (OARs) (D2cc) were recorded.

RESULTS

All patients completed interstitial brachytherapy treatment with the 3D-printed ICIT. One patient experienced vaginal cuff tumor recurrence, and nine patients experienced parametrial tumor recurrence (four on the left and five on the right). We used two to five interstitial needles, and the maximum angle of the curved needle was 40°. No source obstruction events occurred during treatment of these 10 patients. The doses delivered to the targets and OARs of all patients were within the dose limits and based on clinical experience at our center.

CONCLUSION

The ICIT is a treatment option for patients with distal parauterine tumor recurrence. This method addresses the limitations of vaginal intracavitary and standard interstitial applicators. The ICIT has the advantages of biocompatibility, personalization, and magnetic resonance imaging compatibility.

Transrectal Ultrasound in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review of its Current Application

Introduction

The use of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is established in prostate cancer but remains limited in cervical cancer. This systematic review aims to aggregate and describe the current use and advancements of TRUS in cervical cancer to identify gaps in the literature.

Methods

This study follows a protocol registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42024520099). It includes cervical cancer patients confirmed by histopathological analysis, where TRUS was used for diagnosis or as an adjunct to therapeutic procedures. Cross-sectional, case-control, cohort, or randomized controlled trials published in any language were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS).

Results

From an initial pool of 3380 articles, 50 duplicates were removed, leaving 3330 unique articles. After screening titles and abstracts, 2932 articles were excluded, resulting in 31 studies included in the review. These studies involved 1635 women with cervical cancers, with a mean age of 52.9 years. Histopathologically, 81.2% were squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and 39.6% were at FIGO stage IIB. Nineteen studies were prospective, five retrospective, and fourteen used consecutive sampling. Only 10 articles had a fair rating, while the rest received poor ratings. Complications from post-TRUS included pain (N = 106), haemorrhage (N = 59), and perforations (N = 10). TRUS was used in seven areas, including cancer extension and pre-operative assessment. It showed a strong correlation with MRI but had lower sensitivity. TRUS was useful in staging, diagnosis, and guiding brachytherapy, demonstrating comparable accuracy to MRI in several instances.

Conclusion

The recommended use of TRUS in cervical cancer is still limited in formal guidelines, and clinical research remains insufficient.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13224-024-02047-8.

Transrectal ultrasound for intraoperative interstitial needle guidance in cervical cancer brachytherapy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to prospectively assess the visibility of interstitial needles on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in cervical cancer brachytherapy patients and evaluate its impact on implant and treatment plan quality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

TRUS was utilized during and after applicator insertion, with each needle's visibility documented through axial images at the high-risk clinical target volume's largest diameter. Needle visibility on TRUS was scored from 0 (no visibility) to 3 (excellent discrimination, margins distinct). Quantitative assessment involved measuring the distance between tandem and each needle on TRUS and comparing it to respective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. Expected treatment plan quality based on TRUS images was rated from 1 (meeting all planning objectives) to 4 (violation of High-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR) and/or organ at risk (OAR) hard constraints) and compared to the final MRI-based plan.

RESULTS

Analysis included 23 patients with local FIGO stage IB2-IVA, comprising 41 applications with a total of 230 needles. A high visibility rate of 99.1% (228/230 needles) was observed, with a mean visibility score of 2.5 ± 0.7 for visible needles. The maximum and mean difference between MRI and TRUS measurements were 8 mm and -0.1 ± 1.6 mm, respectively, with > 3 mm discrepancies in 3.5% of needles. Expected treatment plan quality after TRUS assessment exactly aligned with the final MRI plan in 28 out of 41 applications with only minor deviations in all other cases.

CONCLUSION

Real-time TRUS-guided interstitial needle placement yielded high-quality implants, thanks to excellent needle visibility during insertion. This supports the potential of TRUS-guided brachytherapy as a promising modality for gynecological indications.

Current Status and Future Directions of Image-Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

PURPOSE

The standard of care for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer is definitive chemoradiation followed by a brachytherapy boost. This review describes the current status and future directions of image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov databases was performed, focusing on studies published within the last 10 years. The search queried "cervical cancer [AND] image-guided brachytherapy [OR] magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [OR] adaptive brachytherapy".

DISCUSSION

The retroEMBRACE and EMBRACE-I trials have established the use of MRI as the standard imaging modality for brachytherapy application and planning. Quantitative imaging and radiomics have the potential to improve outcomes, with three ongoing prospective studies examining the use of radiomics to further risk-stratify patients and personalize brachytherapy. Another active area of investigation includes utilizing the superior soft tissue contrast provided by MRI to increase the dose per fraction and decrease the number of fractions needed for brachytherapy, with several retrospective studies demonstrating the safety and feasibility of three-fraction courses. For developing countries with limited access to MRI, trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) appears to be an effective alternative, with several retrospective studies demonstrating improved target delineation with the use of TRUS in conjunction with CT guidance.

CONCLUSIONS

Further investigation is needed to continue improving outcomes for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with image-guided brachytherapy.

High-Dose-Rate Three-Dimensional Image-Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy (3D IGABT) for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (LACC): A Narrative Review on Imaging Modality and Clinical Evidence

Background: Brachytherapy (BT) is a critical component of radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), and it has rapidly developed in recent decades. Since the advent of three-dimensional image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (3D-IGABT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as the primary modality for image guidance. Meanwhile, other imaging modalities, such as computed tomography, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, ultrasound, and their combinations have also been widely studied. Materials and methods: We reviewed studies on different imaging modalities utilized for target delineation and planning. Emerging techniques in IGABT like real-time image guidance and 3D printing were also included. We summarized research on their feasibility and concentrated on their clinical outcomes. Results: MRI-guided BT was the gold standard, and CT-guided BT was the most widely applied. Other modalities have shown feasibility and promising efficacy in dosimetry studies and preliminary outcomes. The longer-term clinical outcomes associated with these approaches require further elucidation. Conclusions: As 3D-IGABT was validated by promising clinical outcomes, the future of BT for LACC is expected to progress toward the refinement of more effective image-guided procedures. Moreover, achieving operational consensus and driving technological advancements to mitigate the inherent limitations associated with different imaging modes remain essential.

Clinical implementation of 3D transvaginal ultrasound for intraoperative guidance of needle implant in template interstitial gynecologic high-dose-rate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To demonstrate novel clinical implementation of a 3D transvaginal ultrasound (3DTVUS) system for intraoperative needle insertion guidance in perineal template interstitial gynecologic high-dose-rate brachytherapy and assess its impact on implant quality.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Interstitial implants began with preimplant 3DTVUS to visualize the tumor and anatomy, with intermittent 3DTVUS to assess the implant and guide needle adjustment. Analysis includes visualization of the implant relative to anatomy, identification of cases where 3DTVUS is beneficial, dosimetry, and a survey distributed to 3DTVUS clinicians.

RESULTS

Seven patients treated between November 2021 and October 2022 were included in this study. Twenty needles were inserted under 3DTVUS guidance. The tumor and vaginal wall were well-differentiated in four and all seven patients, respectively. Patients with tumours below the superior aspect of the vagina are suited for 3DTVUS. Four radiation oncologists responded to the survey. There was general agreement that 3DTVUS improves implant and anatomy visualization and is preferred over standard 2D ultrasound guidance techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on qualitative feedback from primary users and a small preliminary patient cohort, 3DTVUS imaging improves tumor and vaginal wall visualization during gynecologic perineal template interstitial needle implant and is a powerful tool for implant assessment in an intraoperative setting.

Application of three-dimensional multi-imaging combination in brachytherapy of cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional (3D) imaging has an important role in brachytherapy and the treatment of cervical cancer. The main imaging methods used in the cervical cancer brachytherapy include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computer tomography (CT), ultrasound (US), and positron emission tomography (PET). However, single-imaging methods have certain limitations compared to multi-imaging. The application of multi-imaging can make up for the shortcomings and provide a more suitable imaging selection for brachytherapy.

PURPOSE

This review details the situation and scope of existing multi-imaging combination methods in cervical cancer brachytherapy and provides a reference for medical institutions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Searched the literature related to application of three-dimensional multi-imaging combination in brachytherapy of cervical cancer in PubMed/Medline and Web of Science electronic databases. Summarized the existing combined imaging methods and the application of each method in cervical cancer brachytherapy.

CONCLUSION

The current imaging combination methods mainly include MRI/CT, US/CT, MRI/US, and MRI/PET. The combination of two imaging tools can be used for applicator implantation guidance, applicator reconstruction, target and organs at risk (OAR) contouring, dose optimization, prognosis evaluation, etc., which provides a more suitable imaging choice for brachytherapy.

A new technique for performing interstitial implants for gynecologic malignancies using transvaginal ultrasound guidance

Objectives

This study concerns a new technique that aims to achieve precise interstitial brachytherapy of pelvic recurrent tumors under transvaginal ultrasound (US) guidance, enhance the conformity index of the brachytherapy (BT), and improve the curative effect of radiotherapy for gynecological oncology patients with pelvic relapse.

Methods

A real-time transvaginal US-guided interstitial implant device was developed to assist in implant BT. Prior to implant brachytherapy, the size and location of the tumor in the pelvis and the interrelationship with adjacent organs were first assessed with intracavitary ultrasound. The transvaginal US-guided interstitial implant device was then placed on the endoluminal ultrasound probe, the probe was oriented intravaginally to determine a safe needle path, the implant needle was placed into the needle passage of the device, and the implant needle was inserted into the tumor tissue in the direction guided by the ultrasound puncture guide line. After the implant needle was placed in place, the cover of the transvaginal US-guided interstitial implant device was opened perpendicular to the ultrasound probe, and the needle was separated from the ultrasound probe smoothly, and then the cover was re-covered for subsequent implantation.

Results

In this study, 56 patients who underwent real-time transvaginal ultrasound-guided implantation for gynecologic oncology were enrolled, and insertion of 736 implant needles was completed. Among them, 13 patients had recurrent pelvic tumors after cervical cancer surgery and 6 patients had recurrent pelvic tumors after endometrial cancer surgery. Thirty-two patients who underwent radical radiation therapy for cervical cancer did not have adequate regression of parametrial invaded tissue after completion of standard EBRT treatment; and 5 patients had recurrent tumors in the radiation field after previous standard course of pelvic radiotherapy. The accuracy of the implant therapy was improved. The radiotherapy dose for recurrent pelvic masses was successfully increased, and the cumulative dose of external irradiation combined with BT was augmented to 80–100 Gy. The use of a new device for transvaginal implant for recurrent masses located in the lateral wall of the pelvic cavity was successful.

Conclusion

This intravascular US-guided interstitial implant device can realize interstitial implant with the shortest path under transvaginal US guidance. With convenient operation, high precision, and good security, the device not only improves the accuracy of implant therapy, but it also reduces the risks of anesthesia and organ injury, so it is suitable for widespread promotion and use.

Galalae R. Ultrasound-Guided Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer - A Tool for Quality Improvement in Brachytherapy?

Nowadays, brachytherapy is one of the major components to treat inoperable cervical cancer. Brachytherapy yields a higher dose to the target (cervix) while sparing normal tissues. Developments of brachytherapy stepped forward in the previous decade by image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) turning brachytherapy from point-based planning to volume-based planning and IGBT improves the treatment quality for cervical cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) is utilized in brachytherapy and showed promising results internationally. However, in a limited-resource area, the implementation of IGABT is difficult due to many causes (manpower, equipment, or budgets). To improve the quality in limited resources, ultrasound is introduced. The utilization of ultrasound in brachytherapy practice is to prevent uterine perforation during application. With present data, measurement by ultrasound showed the correlation to MRI measurement in uterine dimensions. With these aspects, there are many researches using ultrasound to improve the quality of treatment in brachytherapy, for example, to guide contouring on CT or to support brachytherapy planning. The use of ultrasound improves the quality of brachytherapy in comparison to conventional planning and supports the improvement in brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Contemporary image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy: Consensus imaging recommendations from the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Brachytherapy Society

PURPOSE

To present recommendations for the use of imaging for evaluation and procedural guidance of brachytherapy for cervical cancer patients.

METHODS

An expert panel comprised of members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease Focused Panel and the American Brachytherapy Society jointly assessed the existing literature and provide data-driven guidance on imaging protocol development, interpretation, and reporting.

RESULTS

Image-guidance during applicator implantation reduces rates of uterine perforation by the tandem. Postimplant images may be acquired with radiography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and CT or MRI are preferred due to a decrease in severe complications. Pre-brachytherapy T2-weighted MRI may be used as a reference for contouring the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) when CT is used for treatment planning. Reference CT and MRI protocols are provided for reference.

CONCLUSIONS

Image-guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer is essential for optimal patient management. Various imaging modalities, including orthogonal radiographs, ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, remain integral to the successful execution of image-guided brachytherapy.

Ultrasound guidance for cervical implantation

Ultrasound can provide real-time imagery without the risk of radiation exposure, and it is widely available at a relatively low cost. It can provide updated three-dimensional information that can improve the physician’s spatial awareness during a brachytherapy procedure for cervical cancer. There is mounting evidence demonstrating the numerous benefits of ultrasound-guided brachytherapy in the published literature. This evidence supports its routine use to improve the safety and the effectiveness of cervical brachytherapy. In this report we will review various methods in which ultrasound imaging has been used during cervical brachytherapy. We also include a description of our own institutional approach to ultrasound-guided cervical implementation that has been in use for all cervical brachytherapy procedures over the past two decades.

Technical Note: Commissioning of an ultrasound-compatible surrogate vaginal cylinder for transvaginal ultrasound-based gynecologic high-dose-rate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To provide a comprehensive set of commissioning tests for clinical implementation of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D TVUS) as a replacement of computed tomography (CT) for applicator reconstruction in gynecologic intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy with a multi-channel vaginal cylinder.

METHODS

We introduce an ultrasound-compatible "surrogate" vaginal cylinder (SVC) for reconstruction of Elekta's CT-MR Multi Channel Applicator (MCVC) in 3D TVUS. The MCVC is digitized over the SVC in 3DUS using digital library model overlay. Consulting guidelines from various sources (CPQR, GEC-ESTRO, AAPM), we identify and describe three tests specific to commissioning the SVC: 1) verification of SVC outer dimensions, 2) source position accuracy of MCVC digitization over the SVC in 3D TVUS, and 3) MRI/US registration error.

RESULTS

The SVC outer dimensions (diameter and A-D marker locations) were well matched to the MCVC, however a 0.6 mm discrepancy in length between cylinder tips was observed. Source position accuracy was within 1 mm (tolerance recommended by CPQR) when reconstructing the MCVC in 3D TVUS. Dice similarity coefficients and target registration error for MRI/3D TVUS registration was similar to MRI/CT registration, which is the clinical standard.

CONCLUSIONS

These commissioning tests are performed using institutional equipment but provide the framework for any practitioners to repeat in their own setup, to demonstrate safe adoption of the 3D TVUS system for patient treatments. We demonstrate that MRI/US-based workflow achieves similar source position accuracy and image registration error as standard MRI/CT, which is consistent with standard tolerances. This is a critical step towards replacement of CT with US in gynecologic high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatments with the MCVC. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Dosimetric impact of target definition in brachytherapy for cervical cancer - Computed tomography and trans rectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging

Background and Purpose

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) based target definition in cervix brachytherapy is limited by its availability, logistics and financial implications, therefore, use of computed tomography (CT) and Trans Rectal UltraSonography (TRUS) has been explored. The current study evaluated the dosimetric impact of CT + TRUS based target volumes as compared to gold standard MRI.

Methods and Materials

Images of patients (n = 21) who underwent TRUS followed by MRI and CT, were delineated with High-Risk Clinical Target Volume in CT (CTVHR-CT) and in MRI (CTVHR-MR). CTVHR-CT was drawn on CT images with TRUS assistance. For each patient, two treatment plans were made, on MRI and CT, followed by fusion and transfer of CTVHR-MR to the CT images, referred as CTVHR-MRonCT. The agreement between CTVHR-MRonCT and CTVHR-CT was evaluated for dosimetric parameters (D90, D98 and D50; Dose received by 90%, 98% and 50% of the volumes) using Bland-Altman plots, linear regression, and Pearson correlation.

Results

No statistically significant systematic difference was found between MRI and CT. Mean difference (±1.96 SD) of D90, D98 and D50 between CTVHR-MRonCT and CTVHR-CT was 2.0, 1.2 and 5.6 Gy respectively. The number of patients who have met the dose constraints of D90 > 85 Gy were 90% and 80% in MR and in CT respectively, others were in the borderline, with a minimum dose of 80 Gy. The mean ± SD dose-difference between MR and CT plans for bladder was significant (5 ± 13 Gy; p = 0.12) for D0.1cm3, while others were statistically insignificant.

Conclusion

CT + TRUS based delineation of CTVHR appear promising, provide useful information to optimally utilize for brachytherapy planning, however, MRI remains the gold standard.

Toward 3D-TRUS image-guided interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer

PURPOSE

To qualitatively and quantitatively analyze needle visibility in combined intracavitary and interstitial cervical cancer brachytherapy on 3D transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in comparison to gold standard MRI.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Image acquisition was done with a customized TRUS stepper unit and software (Medcom, Germany; Elekta, Sweden; ACMIT, Austria) followed by an MRI on the same day with the applicator in place. Qualitative assessment was done with following scoring system: 0 = no visibility 1 (= poor), 2 (= fair), 3 (= excellent) discrimination, quantitative assessment was done by measuring the distance between each needle and the tandem two centimeters (cm) above the ring and comparing to the respective measurement on MRI.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine implants and a total of 188 needles (132 straight, 35 oblique, 21 free-hand) were available. Overall, 79% were visible (87% straight, 51% oblique, 76% free-hand). Mean visibility score was 1.4 ± 0.5 for all visible needles. Distance of the visible needles to tandem was mean ± standard deviation (SD) 21.3 millimeters (mm) ± 6.5 mm on MRI and 21.0 mm ± 6.4 mm on TRUS, respectively. Difference between MRI and TRUS was max 14 mm, mean ± SD -0.3 mm ± 2.6 mm. 11% differed more than 3 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Straight needles were better detectable than oblique needles (87% vs. 51%). Detectability was impaired by insufficient rotation of the TRUS probe, poor image quality or anatomic variation. As needles show a rather indistinct signal on TRUS, online detection with a standardized imaging protocol in combination with tracking should be investigated, aiming at the development of real time image guidance and online treatment planning.

Comparative dosimetry of brachytherapy treatment planning between a volume-based plan by CT and a point-based plan by TAUS in CT datasets for brachytherapy

Aim:

To evaluate comparative dosimetry of brachytherapy treatment planning between a volume-based plan by computed tomography (CT) and a point-based plan by transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) in CT datasets for brachytherapy.

Materials and methods:

From 2019 to 2021, 59 different datasets of CT images were collected from 38 patients treated by intracavitary brachytherapy with tandem ovoid or tandem ring applicators. At that time, TAUS was performed to prevent uterine perforation and to evaluate topography of the cervix during application. In volume-based planning by CT, the target dose was used to keep the dose at 90% of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), to give a dose of at least 7Gy, while in the point-based plan by TAUS, the target dose was used to keep the minimum dose to eight cervix reference points (measured by TAUS), to give a dose of at least 7Gy. The doses to targets and organs at risk were evaluated and compared between volume-based planning by CT and the point-based plan by TAUS.

Results:

Of 59 fractions, a tandem ovoid applicator was used in 48 fractions (81·3%). In the volume-based plan by CT, the mean doses to HR-CTV(D90), intermediate-risk clinical target volume (IR-CTV)(D90), bladder(D2cc), rectum(D2cc) and sigmoid colon(D2cc) were 7·0, 3·9, 4·9, 2·9 and 3·3 Gy, respectively, while in the point-based plan by TAUS, the mean doses to HR-CTV(D90), IR-CTV(D90), bladder(D2cc), rectum(D2cc) and sigmoid colon(D2cc) were 8·2, 4·6, 5·9, 3·4 and 3·9 Gy, respectively. The percentages of mean dose differences between TAUS and CT of HR-CTV(D90), IR-CTV(D90), bladder(D2cc), rectum(D2cc) and sigmoid colon(D2cc) were 17·7, 19·5, 20·5, 19·5, 21·3 and 19·8%, respectively. With the target dose to the point-based plan by TAUS (7 Gy to the cervix reference points), this was close to D98 of HR-CTV with a mean percentage of difference of 0·6%.

Findings:

The point-based plan by TAUS showed higher values to targets and organs at risk than the volume-based plan by CT. With the point-based plan by TAUS, it was close to D98 of HR-CTV.

Quantitative and qualitative application of clinical drawings for image-guided brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients

Purpose

Clinical drawings are integral part of image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) of cervical cancer. It was used in EMBRACE study protocol as a useful tool. In our study clinical drawings from EMBRACE study were modified to include scales in all the dimensions for more accurate representation of various tumor related volumes. The aim of the present study was to understand patterns of tumor regression and relationship between gross tumor at diagnosis (GTVD) and high-risk clinical target volume (CTV-T_HR)/intermediate-risk clinical target volume (CTV-T_IR) in brachytherapy (BRT), using modified clinical drawings.

Material and methods

42 cervical cancer patients, staged as FIGO IIB-IIIB according to EMBRACE study, were enrolled. Advanced schematic 3D mapping diagram (3D-MD) in axial, coronal, and sagittal orientations, with a measurement scale (grid with 10 mm distance) for precise assessment and documentation was applied (through MRI at diagnosis and during brachytherapy). Dimensions, including height, width, and thickness as well as volumes (GTVD, CTV-T_HR and CTV-T_IR) were compared both qualitatively and quantitatively.

Results and conclusions

We found qualitative and quantitative correlation of the dimensions of final CTV-T_HR with initial GTVD. Meticulous mapping of tumor volumes can provide useful insights to CTV-T_HR volume during brachytherapy.

Clinical values of transrectal ultrasound in judging GTV of cervical cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical value of transrectal ultrasound in judging the Gross Target Volume (GTV) of cervical cancer (CC).

METHODS

A total of 196 CC patients admitted to the Department of Radiotherapy, China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, from January 2016 to June 2019 were selected as the study subjects. The GTVs before and after applicator insertion were determined by transrectal ultrasound and compared with those judged by MRI.

RESULTS

All 196 patients were successfully undergoing applicator insertion according to the pretreatment plan. The GTV doses reached the clinical requirements during treatment. There was no significant difference between the GTVs judged by MRI and ultrasound before insertion in terms of upper/lower diameter (MRI Before 1 vs. Ultrasound Before 1) (MB1 vs. UB1), left/right diameter (MB2 vs. UB2), or ventral/dorsal diameter (MB3 vs. UB3), and the intragroup correlation coefficients (ICC) were 0.59, 0.77, and 0.66, respectively; moreover, there was no significant difference between the GTVs judged by MRI and ultrasound after insertion in terms of MRI After one vs. Ultrasound After one (MA1 vs. UA1), MA2 vs. UA2, and MA3 vs. UA3, and the ICC values were 0.62, 0.79, and 0.76, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Transrectal ultrasound can satisfactorily determine the GTV of CC and has certain value in brachytherapy for CC.

Feasibility of fusing three-dimensional transabdominal and transrectal ultrasound images for comprehensive intraoperative visualization of gynecologic brachytherapy applicators

PURPOSE

In this study, we propose combining three-dimensional (3D) transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and 3D transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) images of gynecologic brachytherapy applicators to leverage the advantages of each imaging perspective, providing a broader field-of-view and allowing previously obscured features to be recovered. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of fusing these 3D ultrasound (US) perspectives based on the applicator geometry in a phantom prior to clinical implementation.

METHODS

In proof-of-concept experiments, 3D US images of application-specific multimodality pelvic phantoms were acquired with tandem-and-ring and tandem-and-ovoids applicators using previously validated imaging systems. Two TRUS images were acquired at different insertion depths and manually fused based on the position of the ring/ovoids to broaden the TRUS field-of-view. The phantom design allowed "abdominal thickness" to be modified to represent different body habitus and TAUS images were acquired at three thicknesses for each applicator. The merged TRUS images were then combined with TAUS images by rigidly aligning applicator components and manually refining the registration using the positions of source channels and known tandem length, as well as the ring diameter for the tandem-and-ring applicator. Combined 3D US images were manually, rigidly registered to images from a second modality (magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the tandem-and-ring applicator and X-ray computed tomography (CT) for the tandem-and-ovoids applicator (based on applicator compatibility)) to assess alignment. Four spherical fiducials were used to calculate target registration errors (TREs), providing a metric for validating registrations, where TREs were computed using root-mean-square distances to describe the alignment of manually identified corresponding fiducials. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to identify statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the TREs for the three abdominal thicknesses for each applicator type. As an additional indicator of geometric accuracy, the bladder was segmented in the 3D US and corresponding MR/CT images, and volumetric differences and Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) were calculated.

RESULTS

For both applicator types, the combination of 3D TRUS with 3D TAUS images allowed image information obscured by the shadowing artifacts under single imaging perspectives to be recovered. For the tandem-and-ring applicator, the mean ± one standard deviation (SD) TREs from the images with increasing thicknesses were 1.37 ± 1.35 mm, 1.84 ± 1.22 mm, and 1.60 ± 1.00 mm. Similarly, for the tandem-and-ovoids applicator, the mean ± SD TREs from the images with increasing thicknesses were 1.37 ± 0.35 mm, 1.95 ± 0.90 mm, and 1.61 ± 0.76 mm. No statistically significant difference was detected in the TREs for the three thicknesses for either applicator type. The mean volume differences for the bladder segmentations were 3.14% and 2.33% and mean DSCs were 87.8% and 87.7% for the tandem-and-ring and tandem-and-ovoids applicators, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this proof-of-concept study, we demonstrated the feasibility of fusing 3D TRUS and 3D TAUS images based on the geometry of tandem-and-ring and tandem-and-ovoids applicators. This represents a step toward an accessible and low-cost 3D imaging method for gynecologic brachytherapy, with the potential to extend this approach to other intracavitary configurations and hybrid applicators.

IBS-GEC ESTRO-ABS recommendations for CT based contouring in image guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer

MR Imaging is regarded asthe gold standardfor Image Gudied Adaptive Brachytherapy (IGABT) for cervical cancer. However, its wide applicability is limited by its availability, logistics and financial implications. Use of alternative imaging like CTand Ultrasound (US) for IGABT has been attempted. In order to arrive at a systematic, uniform and international approach for CT based definition and contouring of target structures, GEC ESTRO, IBS and ABS agreed to jointly develop such recommendations based on the concepts and terms as published in the ICRU Report 89. The minimum requirements are clinical examination & documentation, CT or MR imaging at diagnosis and at a minimum, CT imaging with the applicator in place. The recommendations are based on (i) assessment of the GTV at diagnosis and at brachytherapy, (ii) categorizing the response to external radiation into different clinical remission patterns, (iii) defining various clinico-radiological environments and (iv) definition & delineation of a target on CT imaging at the time of brachytherapy with the applicator in situ. CT based target contouring recommendations based on 4 remission categories within 8 defined environments, aim at improving the contouring accuracy for IGABT using CT, US and MRI as available. For each clinico-radiological environment, there is an attempt to minimize the specific uncertainties in order to arrive at the best possible contouring accuracy. Evaluating feasibility & reproducibility, to achieve a benchmark towards a gold standard MR IGABT and further clinical research including outcomes with CT Based IGABT will become the next steps.

Ultrasound-guided Brachytherapy for Cervix Cancer

Radiotherapy and brachytherapy are the definitive treatments for locally advanced cervix cancer. The use of soft-tissue imaging, particularly magnetic resonance imaging, has enhanced their effectiveness and improved clinical outcomes. However, the use of magnetic resonance imaging is largely restricted to well-resourced centres in both the first and developing world and remains elusive to many less advantaged centres, particularly those in areas with a high burden of cervix cancer. Ultrasound is an accessible, affordable and accurate imaging modality that can be used throughout the brachytherapy procedure. Ultrasound is primarily used to ensure safe insertion of the applicator but can also be used to guide planning. The methods used to utilise ultrasound images for planning are described. Ultrasound is particularly useful as a verification aid to confirm applicator placement after patients are moved and transferred around the radiotherapy department. It can also be used to verify the dimensions of treatment volumes over the course of brachytherapy. There is a crucial unmet need for an accessible economical soft-tissue imaging modality in cervical brachytherapy. Ultrasound has the potential to meet this need.

Quality Assurance in Modern Gynecological HDR-Brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy): Clinical Considerations and Comments

Simple Summary

This is a focused review discussing quality assurance during interventional brachytherapy in gynecological cancers. This topic is very large and is usually addressed from the technical and physical sides, therefore, we decided to select “hot-spots” under this large title and discuss them from the point of view of clinicians. We hope that this concise and focused review will help clinicians in improving their quality assurance protocols and draw attention to the discussed issues.

Abstract

The use of brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy) in the treatment of gynecological cancers is a crucial element in both definitive and adjuvant settings. The recent developments in high-dose rate remote afterloaders, modern applicators, treatment-planning software, image guidance, and dose monitoring systems have led to improvement in the local control rates and in some cases improved the survival rates. The development of these highly advanced and complicated treatment modalities has been accompanied by challenges, which have made the existence of quality assurance protocols a must to ensure the integrity of the treatment process. Quality assurance aims at standardizing the technical and clinical procedures involved in the treatment of patients, which could eventually decrease the source of uncertainties whether technical (source/equipment related) or clinical. This commentary review sheds light (from a clinical point of view) on some potential sources of uncertainties associated with the use of modern brachytherapy in the treatment of gynecological cancers.

Comparison of clinical outcomes achieved with image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervix cancer using CT or transabdominal ultrasound

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate retrospectively the treatment results when using various image-guided adaptive brachytherapy treatments for cervical cancer treated by radical radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 2014 to 2017, 188 patients with cervical carcinoma were treated by whole pelvic radiotherapy plus four fractions of image-guided brachytherapy. Eight patients were excluded because of missing data. Consequently, 180 patients were analyzed. Of 180 patients, 92 were treated by CT-based brachytherapy (CT-BT), and transabdominal ultrasound-based brachytherapy (TAUS-BT) was used to treat another group. The treatment results and toxicity outcomes were evaluated by comparing the image-guidance techniques.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 32 months (interquartile range 29.5-42 months). The mean age was 57 years (interquartile range from 50 to 65 years). In the CT-BT group, the mean cumulative doses to high-risk clinical target volume, bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 87.2 Gy, 84.0 Gy, 68.8 Gy, and 69.8 Gy, respectively. In the TAUS-BT group, the mean cumulative doses to the cervix reference, bladder, and rectum points were 84.0 Gy, 65.5 Gy, and 74.0 Gy, respectively. There were no differences in the 2-year local control rate (p = 0.88) and disease-free survival rate (p = 0.34) in both groups. No difference in gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity was observed in both groups, but there was higher vaginal toxicity in the TAUS-BT group compared with the CT-BT group (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

No difference in treatment results was observed between CT-based and TAUS-based approaches. However, TAUS-BT had higher vaginal toxicity in our retrospective analysis.

Application of transrectal ultrasound in guiding interstitial brachytherapy for advanced cervical cancer

Purpose

To investigate the role of transrectal ultrasound guidance in interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Material and methods

Forty-eight patients who underwent interstitial brachytherapy treatment for cervical cancer between January 2017 and January 2018 were enrolled in the study. The distances between each inserted needle and the lesion were measured at seven sites by ultrasound (D1-D7) and compared to the corresponding distances (M1-M7) when visualised with nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Measurements were paired on the basis of the observation sites, e.g. D1 and M1, D2 and M2. The statistical differences, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and linear relationships for the paired measurements were calculated.

Results

No significant differences were found between the paired M and D measurements, with all ICCs showing high levels of concordance (0.81-0.93).

Conclusions

Transrectal ultrasound showed strong agreement with MRI results in determining the position of the inserted needles. Transrectal ultrasound is a useful tool for guided interstitial brachytherapy and is appropriate for widespread use in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.

Hybrid TRUS/CT with optical tracking for target delineation in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively compare the interobserver variability of combined transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)/computed tomography (CT)- vs. CT only- vs. magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) only-based contouring of the high-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR) in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC).

METHODS

Five patients with LACC (FIGO stages IIb-IVa) treated with radiochemotherapy and IGABT were included. CT, TRUS, and T2-weighted MRI images were performed after brachytherapy applicator insertion. 3D-TRUS image acquisition was performed with a customized ultrasound stepper device and software. Automatic applicator reconstruction using optical tracking was performed in the TRUS dataset and TRUS and CT images were fused with rigid image registration with the applicator as reference structure. The CTVHR (based on the GEC-ESTRO recommendations) was contoured by five investigators on the three modalities (CTVHR_CT, CTVHR_TRUS-CT, and CTVHR_MRI). A consensus reference CTVHR_MRI (MRIref) was defined for each patient. Descriptive statistics and overlap measures were calculated using RTslicer (SlicerRT Community and Percutaneous Surgery Laboratory, Queen's University, Canada), comparing contours of every observer with one another and with the MRIref.

RESULTS

The interobserver coefficient of variation was 0.18 ± 0.05 for CT, 0.10 ± 0.04 for TRUS-CT, and 0.07 ± 0.03 for MRI. Interobserver concordance in relation to the MRIref expressed by the generalized conformity index was 0.75 ± 0.04 for MRI, 0.51 ± 0.10 for TRUS-CT, and 0.48 ± 0.06 for CT. The mean CTVHR_CT volume of all observers was 71% larger than the MRIref volume, whereas the mean CTVHR_TRUS-CT volume was 15% larger.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid TRUS-CT as an imaging modality for contouring the CTVHR in IGABT for LACC is feasible and reproducible among multiple observers. TRUS-CT substantially reduces overestimation of the CTVHR volume of CT alone while maintaining similar interobserver variability.

Dosimetry of a sonolucent material for an ultrasound-compatible gynecologic high-dose-rate brachytherapy cylinder using Monte Carlo simulation and radiochromic film

PURPOSE

he purpose of this study was to study the dosimetric characterization of sonolucent material "TPX" to be used toward gynecologic high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatments using ultrasound-compatible cylinders in non-model-based dose calculation workflows.

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulations were performed using EGSnrc application egs_brachy in cylinders of polymethylpentene (TPX) plastic, water, and PMMA. Simulations were performed of five 192Ir sources placed longitudinally in ∼3.7 cm diameter, 5.0 cm length cylinders (matching physical cylinders used in film measurements). TPX and PMMA dose distributions and percentage depth dose curves were compared relative to water. Film measurements were performed to validate egs_brachy simulations. TPX and PMMA cylinders were placed in a water tank using 3D-printed supports to position film radially and touching the surface of the cylinders. The same five 192Ir dwell positions were delivered as simulated in egs_brachy.

RESULTS

The egs_brachy and film percentage depth doses agreed within film uncertainties. The egs_brachy relative dose difference between TPX and water was (0.74 ± 0.09)% and between PMMA and water was (-0.79 ± 0.09)% over the dose scoring phantom. Dose differences for TPX and PMMA relative to water were less than ± 1% within 5 cm of the cylinder surface.

CONCLUSIONS

In a solid sonolucent sheath of TPX, the dosimetric differences are comparable with PMMA and other applicator materials in clinical use. No additional uncertainty to dose calculation is introduced when treating through TPX cylinders compared with current applicator materials, and therefore, it is acceptable to perform gynecologic brachytherapy treatments with a sonolucent sheath inserted during radiation delivery.

Clinical Application of Ultrasound Guidance for Parametrial Treatment of Advanced Cervical Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound (US) in determining the positions of parametrial implants by comparing US with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for advanced cervical cancer.

METHODS

Patients undergoing brachytherapy with parametrial implantation for cervical cancer from February 2017 to February 2019 were involved in the study. The transverse section of the cervix (surface S₁ ) and the transverse section 1 cm above the external cervix (surface S₂ ) were selected from MRI and US images as the observation planes. In the MRI observation plane, the distances between the uterine titanium needles and the uterine tube/implanter were set as M₁ to M₄ ; in the US observation plane, the distances between the uterine titanium needles and the uterine tube/implanter were set as D₁ to D₄ . The differences and consistency in M and D of each group were then compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between M and D in each group (P = .058; P = .821; P = .870; and P = .936, respectively). The intraclass correlation coefficients of M and D in each group were 0.970, 0.968, 0.952, and 0.956. A regression analysis showed that the relationships between M and D in each group were as follows: M₁ = 0.9449D₁  + 0.1812; M₂ = 0.9463D₂  + 0.0965; M₃ = 0.9176D₃  + 0.1233; and M₄ = 0.9253D₄  + 0.1224.

CONCLUSIONS

In parametrial brachytherapy for cervical cancer, US can accurately determine the positions of parametrial implantation needles, which is already applicable on MRI, and can provide assistance in parametrial brachytherapy for advanced cervical cancer.

Comparison of CTVHR and organs at risk contours between TRUS and MR images in IB cervical cancers: a proof of concept study

Purpose

To compare CTV_HR and OAR dimensions and inter-rater agreement between magnetic resonance (MR) and trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) images in IB cervical cancer patients.

Methods

IB cervical cancer patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy plus MR-guided brachytherapy (BT) were prospectively enrolled in this study. Radiation oncologists contoured CTV_HR and OARs in pre-BT MR images (MRI) and intra-operative TRUS images. These contours were subsequently compared in regard to volume and dimension. Contour inter-rater agreement analysis was also investigated using kappa index (KI). Stata 15.0 was used for statistical analysis and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

TRUS CTV_HR volumes were statistically smaller than the respective MRI contoured volumes. TRUS CTV_HR thickness was found to be consistently smaller than MRI contours in all patients. No statistical difference was seen in width and height between the two different imaging modalities. MRI contours had a median KI of 0.66 (range: 0.56–0.77) while TRUS-based contours had a median KI of 0.64 (range: 0.47–0.77). Bladder and rectum had very satisfactory KI in both imaging modalities. Vaginal contours had moderate agreement in MR (0.52) and in TRUS images (0.58).

Conclusion

TRUS images allow good visualization of CTV_HR and OARs in IB cervical cancer patients. Inter-rater contour variability was comparable between TRUS and MR images. TRUS is a promising modality on its own for image-guided BT.

GEC-ESTRO/ACROP recommendations for quality assurance of ultrasound imaging in brachytherapy

Ultrasound (US) is an important imaging modality in brachytherapy (BT). In particular for low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate implants transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is widespread. Besides the common use of US for prostate implants, US can also be applied in gynecological and anal cancer therapies as examples amongst others. The BRAPHYQS (BRAchytherapy PHYsics Quality assurance System) and UroGEC (urology) working groups of GEC-ESTRO (GEC: Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie, committee of ESTRO: European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology) elaborated upon guidelines describing quality assurance (QA) methods for US in BT. The total quality management (QM) for the unit includes acceptance testing, commissioning and periodic image testing. In 2008, the AAPM (American Association of Physicists in Medicine) published the TG (Task group) 128 report. Whereas the TG 128 focuses on US systems and prostate BT, the current recommendations also cover tests for stepping devices and include other interstitial or intracavitary treatment sites in BT, such as anal implants and gynecological BT. The recommendations presented herein do not replace regular maintenance for the US devices performed by the vendor. They are the QA of US in BT but are not sufficient for the whole maintenance of medical US devices. Moreover, national regulations and recommendations should also be followed. For the tests presented in this report tolerances or action limits are given. These recommendations explain practical test procedures of US devices in BT. They will help the clinics to perform a high level of quality in the use of US for BT in Europe.

Prospective intra/inter-observer evaluation of pre-brachytherapy cervical cancer tumor width measured in TRUS and MR imaging

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound (US) imaging has been proved as an excellent diagnostic tool in gynecology and, due to its wide availability and limited cost, is under intense investigation as base for dose adaptation in cervical cancer brachytherapy. Purpose of this work is to test inter/intra-observer uncertainties between magnetic resonance (MR) and trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) imaging in defining maximum tumor width before first brachytherapy (BT) application in a prospective cohort of cervical cancer patients undergoing image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT).

METHODS

One hundred ten consecutive cervical cancer patients treated between 2013 and 2016 were included. Before the first BT implant patients underwent MR and TRUS scan with no applicator in place. Images were independently analyzed by three examiners, blinded to the other's results. With clinical information at hand, maximum tumor width was measured on preBT TRUS and MR. Quantitative agreement analysis was undertaken. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), Passing-Bablok and Bland Altman plots were used to evaluate the intra/inter-observers measurement agreement.

RESULTS

Average difference between tumor width measured on MR (HRCTV_MR) and TRUS (HRCTV_TRUS) was 1.3 ± 3.2 mm (p <  0.001); 1.1 ± 4.6 mm (p = 0.01) and 0.7 ± 3 mm (p = 0.01). The error was less than 3 mm in 79, 82 and 80% of the measurements for the three observers, respectively. Intra-observer ICC was 0.96 (CI95% 0.94-0.97), 0.93 (CI95% 0.9-0.95) and 0.96 (CI95% 0.95-0.98) respectively. Inter-observer ICC for HRCTV_MR width measures was 0.92 (CI95% 0.89-0.94) with no difference among FIGO stages. Inter-observer ICC for HRCTV_TRUS was 0.86 (CI95% 0.81-0.9). For FIGO stage I and II tumors, ICC HRCTV_TRUS values were comparable to respective HRCTV_MR ICC values. For larger tumors HRCTV_TRUS inter-observer ICC values were lower than respective HRCTV_MR although remaining acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that TRUS is equivalent to MR in assessing preBT tumor maximum width in cervical cancer FIGO stage I/II. In more advanced stages TRUS seems to be slightly inferior to MR although maintaining a good agreement to gold standard imaging.

Review of strategies for MRI based reconstruction of endocavitary and interstitial applicators in brachytherapy of cervical cancer

Brachytherapy plays an essential role in the curative intent management of locally advanced cervical cancer. The introduction of the magnetic resonance (MR) as a preferred image modality and the development of new type of applicators with interstitial components have further improved its benefits. The aim of this work is to review the current status of one important aspect in the cervix cancer brachytherapy procedure, namely catheter reconstruction. MR compatible intracavitary and interstitial applicators are described. Considerations about the use of MR imaging (MRI) regarding appropriate strategies for applicator reconstruction, technical requirements, MR sequences, patient preparation and applicator commissioning are included. It is recommendable to perform the reconstruction process in the same image study employed by the physician for contouring, that is, T2 weighted (T2W) sequences. Nevertheless, a clear identification of the source path inside the catheters and the applicators is a challenge when using exclusively T2W sequences. For the intracavitary component of the implant, sometimes the catheters may be filled with some substance that produces a high intensity signal on MRI. However, this strategy is not feasible for plastic tubes or titanium needles, which, moreover, induce magnetic susceptibility artifacts. In these situations, the use of applicator libraries available in the treatment planning system (TPS) is useful, since they not only include accurate geometrical models of the intracavitary applicators, but also recent developments have made possible the implementation of the interstitial component. Another strategy to improve the reconstruction process is based on the incorporation of MR markers, such as small pellets, to be used as anchor points. Many institutions employ computed tomography (CT) as a supporting image modality. The registration of CT and MR image sets should be carefully performed, and its uncertainty previously assessed. Besides, an important research work is being carried out regarding the use of ultrasound and electromagnetic tracking technologies.

A Prospective Comparison of Computed Tomography with Transrectal Ultrasonography Assistance and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Target-Volume Definition During Image Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancers

PURPOSE

Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents the gold standard for image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) for cervical cancer, the majority of brachytherapy (BT) continues to be guided by computed tomography (CT). However, CT seems to overestimate the target-volume definition, and the potential of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) needs further evaluation. This prospective, comparative study aimed to evaluate CT-based target contouring with the incorporation of TRUS during BT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing magnetic resonance IGABT between January 2013 and March 2014 were included. During the BT procedure, TRUS imaging with central tandem in situ was acquired at 3 representative levels. Reference points/dimensions (D1-D4) of the hypoechoic region on TRUS images with respect to the central tandem were recorded. CT and magnetic resonance BT planning imaging was performed after BT application. The high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) was contoured on CT scans with incorporation of clinical and TRUS imaging findings and was compared with the gold standard MRI-based target approach.

RESULTS

The image sets of 25 patients (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics clinical stage IIB [11; 44%] and IIIB [14; 56%]) were evaluable. The mean (±standard deviation) volumes of HR-CTV on CT and MRI imaging were 39.1 (±20) cm³ and 39 (±19) cm³, respectively (r = 0.92; P < .001)_. A significant correlation was found between the HR-CTV dimensions (width and thickness) of CT and MRI scans at various levels (r = 0.70-0.80; P < .001)_. In addition, the absolute differences in target dimensions between CT and MRI were <0.5 cm. A strong correlation was seen between CT and MRI for patients with medial and lateral parametrial invasion (P < .05) compared with no parametrial disease at BT. Furthermore, the mean differences in HR-CTV width between CT and MRI contours at various levels, irrespective of parametrial involvement, was only 0.1 to 0.4 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that a CT-based target and organ-at-risk delineation using MRI at diagnosis and real-time TRUS information during BT seems comparable with the gold standard MRI-based approach in IGABT for cervical cancer.

Throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the 'actual' targets and organs at risk

Purpose

Computed tomography (CT) is inferior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cervical tumor delineation, but similar in identification of organs at risk (OAR). The trend to over-estimate high-risk and low-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV, IRCTV) on CT can lead to under-estimation of dose received by 90% (D₉₀) of the ‘actual’ CTV. This study aims to evaluate whether CT-guided planning delivers adequate dose to the ‘actual’ targets while spares the OAR similarly.

Material and methods

MRI-guided high-dose-rate image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) was performed in 11 patients. The pre-brachytherapy CTs were retrospectively contoured to generate CT-guided plans. MRI-based contours (HRCTV_mri, IRCTV_mri, bladder_mri, rectum_mri, and sigmoid_mri) were fused to CT plans for dosimetric comparison with MRI-guided plans. Paired 2-tailed t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to analyze data.

Results

63.6% of CT plans achieved the HRCTV_mriD₉₀ constraint (≥ 7.2 Gy in one fraction), compared with 90.9% for MRI plans. > 90% of both modalities achieved the OAR’s constraints (EMBRACE). The percentage of CT and MRI plans that achieved the aims (EMBRACE II) for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 36.4% vs. 81.8%, 63.6% vs. 63.6%, and 72.7% vs. 72.7%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in HRCTV_mriD₉₀, IRCTV_mriD₉₀, or dose received by the most exposed 2 cm³ (D_2cc) of OAR_mri between the modalities. Excluding the CT plans not achieving HRCTV_mriD₉₀ constraint, there were significant increase in bladder_mriD_2cc, rectum_mriD_2cc, and sigmoid_mriD_2cc, compared with MRI plans (0.9 Gy/Fr, 95% CI 0.2-1.5, p = 0.018; 0.9 Gy/Fr, 95% CI 0.3-1.4, p = 0.009; 0.5 Gy/Fr, 95% CI 0.2-0.9, p = 0.027, respectively).

Conclusions

MRI-based IGBT remains the gold standard. CT planning may compromise HRCTV_mriD₉₀ or increase OAR_mriD_2cc, which could decrease local control or increase treatment toxicity.

The use of trans-applicator intracavitary ultrasonography in brachytherapy for cervical cancer: phantom study of a novel approach to 3D image-guided brachytherapy

Purpose

To assess the feasibility of applying trans-applicator intracavitary ultrasonography to image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Material and methods

For this experiment, a phantom was created and included a polyethylene tube, intended to simulate a tandem applicator, which was inserted into chicken meat and embedded in agar, along with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible ovoid applicators. Three-dimensional images of the phantom were obtained using computed tomography (CT), MRI (T2-weighted), and intracavitary ultrasonography sectional images acquired at 1 mm slice intervals. Intracavitary ultrasonography images were acquired from within the simulated tandem applicator using a radial transducer. Magnetic resonance imaging and intracavitary ultrasonography images were manually registered onto CT images. The chicken meat was contoured as the target volume independently on the CT, MRI, and intracavitary ultrasonography images, and the Dice similarity coefficient was used to compare the target volumes. The dose distributions of a sample brachytherapy plan were also evaluated.

Results

Computed tomography, MRI, and intracavitary ultrasonography all visualized the three-dimensional phantom volumes. Intracavitary ultrasonography images depicted the meat with high echoic signals and a border clearly distinguishable from the surrounding agar. The Dice similarity coefficient values for the target volumes on CT vs. MRI, CT vs. intracavitary ultrasonography, and MRI vs. intracavitary ultrasonography were 0.966, 0.965, and 0.971, respectively, indicating similar contouring with the three modalities. Among the modalities, the differences in D₅₀, D₉₀, D₉₈, and D₁₀₀ values were 1.8%, 2.9%, 3.7%, and 2.9%, respectively.

Conclusions

Three-dimensional reconstructed trans-applicator intracavitary ultrasonographic images clearly depicted meat tissue within the phantom, and could thus be used for brachytherapy planning. This study proves the concept of trans-applicator intracavitary ultrasonography for intracavitary brachytherapy. Further research such as development of intracavitary ultrasonography system, 3D reconstruction method, ultrasonography-compatible applicators, and ultrasonography-based target concept is warranted to assess the potential clinical application.

Use of ultrasound in image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy: enumerations and arguments

Inherently, brachytherapy is the most conformal radiotherapeutic technique. As an aid to brachytherapy, ultrasonography (USG) serves as a portable, inexpensive, and simple to use method allowing for accurate, reproducible, and adaptive treatments. Some newer brachytherapy planning systems have incorporated USG as the sole imaging modality. Ultrasonography has been successfully used to place applicator and dose planning for prostate, cervix, and anal canal cancers. It can guide placement of brachytherapy catheters for all other sites like breast, skin, and head and neck cancers. Traditional USG has a few limitations, but recent advances such as 3-dimensional (3D) USG and contrast USG have enhanced its potential as a dependable guide in high-dose-rate image-guided brachytherapy (HDR-IGBT). The authors in this review have attempted to enumerate various aspects of USG in brachytherapy, highlighting its use across various sites.

Use of 3D transabdominal ultrasound imaging for treatment planning in cervical cancer brachytherapy: Comparison to magnetic resonance and computed tomography

PURPOSE

To evaluate if the addition of 3D transabdominal ultrasound (3DTAUS) imaging to computed tomography (CT) can improve treatment planning in 3D adaptive brachytherapy when compared with CT-based planning alone, resulting in treatment plans closer to the ones obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Five patients with cervical cancer undergoing brachytherapy underwent three imaging modalities: MRI, CT, and CT-3DTAUS. Volumes were delineated by a radiation oncologist and treatment plans were optimized on each imaging modality. To compare treatment plans, the dwell times optimized on MRI were transferred on CT and CT-3DTAUS images and dose parameters were reported on volumes of the receiving imaging modality. The plans optimized on CT and CT-3DTAUS were also copied and evaluated on MRI images.

RESULTS

Treatment plans optimized and evaluated on the same imaging modalities were clinically acceptable but statistically different (p < 0.05) from one another. MR-based plans had the highest target coverage (98%) and CT-based plans the lowest (93%). For all treatment plans evaluated on MRI, the target coverage was equivalent. However, a decrease in target coverage (V100) was observed when MR-based plans were applied on CT-3DTAUS (6%) and CT (13%) with p < 0.05. An increase in the rectum/sigmoid dose (D2cc) was observed with both CT-3DTAUS-based (0.6 Gy) and CT-based planning (1 Gy) when compared with MR-based plans, whereas bladder dose stayed similar.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with CT-based planning, the addition of 3DTAUS to CT results in treatment plans closer to MR-based planning. Its use reduces the high-risk clinical target volume overestimation typically observed on CT, improving coverage of the target volume while reducing dose to the organs at risk.

American Brachytherapy Society: Brachytherapy treatment recommendations for locally advanced cervix cancer for low-income and middle-income countries

PURPOSE

Most cervix cancer cases occur in low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC), and outcomes are suboptimal, even for early stage disease. Brachytherapy plays a central role in the treatment paradigm, improving both local control and overall survival. The American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) aims to provide guidelines for brachytherapy delivery in resource-limited settings.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A panel of clinicians and physicists with expertise in brachytherapy administration in LMIC was convened. A survey was developed to identify practice patterns at the authors' institutions and was also extended to participants of the Cervix Cancer Research Network. The scientific literature was reviewed to identify consensus papers or review articles with a focus on treatment of locally advanced, unresected cervical cancer in LMIC.

RESULTS

Of the 40 participants invited to respond to the survey, 32 responded (response rate 80%). Participants were practicing in 14 different countries including both high-income (China, Singapore, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and United States) and low-income or middle-income countries (Bangladesh, Botswana, Brazil, India, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam). Recommendations for modifications to existing ABS guidelines were reviewed by the panel members and are highlighted in this article.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations for treatment of locally advanced, unresectable cervical cancer in LMIC are presented. The guidelines comment on staging, external beam radiotherapy, use of concurrent chemotherapy, overall treatment duration, use of anesthesia, applicator choice and placement verification, brachytherapy treatment planning including dose and prescription point, recommended reporting and documentation, physics support, and follow-up.