1
|
Du Q, Wu X, Zhang K, Cao F, Zhao G, Wei X, Guo Z, Li Y, Dong J, Zhang T, Zhang W, Wang P, Chen X, Pang Q. Predictive and prognostic markers from endoscopic ultrasound with biopsies during definitive chemoradiation therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:681. [PMID: 37474893 PMCID: PMC10357763 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10803-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) may play a role in evaluating treatment response after definitive chemoradiation therapy (dCRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study explored the prognostic markers of EUS with biopsies and developed two nomograms for survival prediction. METHODS A total of 821 patients newly diagnosed with ESCC between January 2015 and December 2019 were reviewed. We investigated the prognostic value of the changes in tumor imaging characteristics and histopathological markers by an interim response evaluation, including presence of stenosis, ulceration, tumor length, tumor thickness, lumen involvement, and tumor remission. Independent prognostic factors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using Cox regression analysis and further selected to build two nomogram models for survival prediction. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to respectively assess its discriminatory capacity, predictive accuracy, and clinical usefulness. RESULTS A total of 155 patients were enrolled in this study and divided into the training (109 cases) and testing (46 cases) cohorts. Tumor length, residual tumor thickness, reduction in tumor thickness, lumen involvement, and excellent remission (ER) of spatial luminal involvement in ESCC (ER/SLI) differed significantly between responders and non-responders. For patients undergoing dCRT, tumor stage (P = 0.001, 0.002), tumor length (P = 0.013, 0.008), > 0.36 reduction in tumor thickness (P = 0.004, 0.004) and ER/SLI (P = 0.041, 0.031) were independent prognostic markers for both PFS and OS. Time-dependent ROC curves, calibration curves, and DCA indicated that the predicted survival rates of our two established nomogram models were highly accurate. CONCLUSION Our nomogram showed high accuracy in predicting PFS and OS for ESCC after dCRT. External validation and complementation of other biomarkers are needed in further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingwu Du
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaoyue Wu
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Kunning Zhang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Fuliang Cao
- Departments of Endoscopy Diagnosis and Therapy, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Gang Zhao
- Departments of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaoying Wei
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhoubo Guo
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yang Li
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Jie Dong
- Department of Nutrition Therapy, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Tian Zhang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Wencheng Zhang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Ping Wang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
| | - Xi Chen
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
| | - Qingsong Pang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yi Q, Liu C, Cui Y, Yang Y, Li Y, Fan X, Wu K. Chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel liposome plus cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis. Cancer Med 2023; 12:6477-6487. [PMID: 37012831 PMCID: PMC10067117 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This single-center retrospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel liposome plus cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS Patients with locally advanced ESCC treated with paclitaxel-liposome-based chemoradiotherapy between 2016 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients with locally advanced ESCC were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 31.5 months. The median OS time was 38.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32.1-45.1) months, and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 84.6%, 64.1%, and 56.2%, respectively. The median PFS time was 32.1 (95% CI: 25.4-39.0) months, and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 71.8%, 43.6%, and 43.6%, respectively. The most common Grade IV toxicity was neutropenia (30.8%) followed by lymphopenia (20.5%). There were no cases of Grade III/IV radiation pneumonia, and four patients (10.3%) had Grade III/IV esophagitis. CONCLUSION Chemoradiotherapy using paclitaxel liposome and cisplatin is a well-tolerated and effective treatment regimen for locally advanced ESCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiong Yi
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of Radiation OncologyNantong Tumor Hospital, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong UniversityNantongChina
| | - Canyu Liu
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of Radiation OncologySuzhou Dushu Lake Hospital, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Medical Center of Soochow UniversitySuzhouChina
| | - Yingshan Cui
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of Radiation OncologyJinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua Municipal Central HospitalZhejiangChina
| | - Yanguang Yang
- Department of Radiation OncologyNantong Tumor Hospital, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong UniversityNantongChina
| | - Yaqi Li
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
| | - Xingwen Fan
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of OncologyShanghai Medical College, Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
| | - Kailiang Wu
- Department of Radiation OncologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of OncologyShanghai Medical College, Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation OncologyShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guo S, Liu F, Liu H, Wu Y, Zhang X, Ye W, Luo G, Li Q, Chen N, Hu N, Wang B, Zhang J, Lin M, Feng H, Qiu B. A Prospective Phase II Study of Simultaneous Modulated Accelerated Radiotherapy Concurrently With CDDP/S1 for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Elderly. Front Oncol 2021; 11:760631. [PMID: 34900709 PMCID: PMC8654786 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.760631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To explore the efficacy and toxicity of simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy (SMART) concurrently with cisplatin (CDDP) and S1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil) in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods This single-arm, phase II study enrolled pathologically confirmed, stage II-IVa ESCC of 70-80 years old and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-2. Patients received SMART (64 Gy to gross tumor volume and 48 Gy to clinical target volume in 30 fractions) with concurrent CDDP (day 1 of each week) and S1 (days 1-14, 22-35). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. Results Thirty-seven eligible patients were analyzed with median follow-up of 25.7 months for all and 46.1 months for survivors. The ORR was 88.9%. Patients with baseline weight loss <5% (p=0.050) and nutritional risk index (NRI) ≥105.2 (p=0.023) had better tumor response. Median PFS was 13.8 months with 2-year PFS of 37.5%. Median OS was 27.7 months with 2-year OS of 57.5%. OS was significantly associated with ECOG PS (p=0.005), stage (p=0.014), gross tumor volume (p=0.004), baseline NRI (p=0.036), baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) level (p=0.003) and tumor response (p=0.000). CRP level (p=0.016) and tumor response (p=0.021) were independently prognostic of OS. ≥grade 3 anemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 2.7%, 10.8% and 13.5% of patients; ≥grade 3 esophagitis and pneumonitis occurred in 18.9% and 2.7% of patient, respectively. Conclusion SMART concurrently with CDDP/S1 yielded satisfactory response rate, survival outcome and tolerable treatment-related toxicities in elderly patients with ESCC. Further studies are warranted to validate the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SuPing Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - FangJie Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China
| | - YingJia Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - XuHui Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - WenFeng Ye
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Clinical Nutrition, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - GuangYu Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Endoscopy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - QiWen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China
| | - NaiBin Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Nan Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - MaoSheng Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - HuiXia Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bo Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ji W, Wang J, Zhou R, Wang M, Wang W, Pang P, Kong M, Zhou C. Diagnostic Performance of Vascular Permeability and Texture Parameters for Evaluating the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:604480. [PMID: 34084740 PMCID: PMC8168434 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.604480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is an aggressive type of cancer, associated with poor prognosis. The development of an accurate and non-invasive method to evaluate the pathologic response of patients with ESCC to chemoradiotherapy remains a critical issue. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the importance of vascular permeability and texture parameters in predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) in patients with ESCC. Methods This prospective analysis included patients with T1–T2 stage of ESCC, without either lymphatic or metastasis, and distant metastasis. All patients underwent surgery having received two rounds of NACRT. All patients underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) twice, i.e., before the first NACRT and after the second NACRT. Patients were assessed for treatment response at 30 days after the second NACRT. Patients were divided into the complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) groups based on their responses to NACRT. Vascular permeability and texture parameters were extracted from the DCE-MRI scans. After assessing the diagnostic performance of individual parameters, a combined model with vascular permeability and texture parameters was generated to predict the response to NACRT. Results In this study, the CR and PR groups included 16 patients each. The volume transfer constant (Ktrans), extracellular extravascular volume fraction (ve), and entropy values, as well as changes to each of these parameters, extracted from the second DCE-MRI scans, showed significant differences between the CR and PR groups. The area under the curve (AUC) of Ktrans, ve, and entropy values showed good diagnostic ability (0.813, 0.789, and 0.707, respectively). A logistic regression model combining Ktrans, ve, and entropy had significant diagnostic ability (AUC=0.977). Conclusions The use of a combined model with vascular permeability and texture parameters can improve post-NACRT prognostication in patients with ESCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenbing Ji
- Department of Radiology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Radiology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, China
| | - Rongzhen Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, China
| | - Minke Wang
- Department of Radiology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, China
| | - Weizhen Wang
- Department of Radiology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, China
| | - Peipei Pang
- Advanced Application Team, GE Healthcare, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Kong
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, China
| | - Chao Zhou
- Department of Radiotherapy, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen NB, Li QW, Li S, Guo SP, Wu YJ, Cheng ZJ, Li JB, Wang DQ, Liu FJ, Ai XL, Hu N, Qiu B, Liu H. Docetaxel and nedaplatin twice a week with concurrent definitive radiotherapy in inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A phase I trial (GASTO-1021). Radiother Oncol 2020; 155:105-112. [PMID: 33144248 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.10.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This phase I trial aimed to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of incorporating a twice-weekly docetaxel and nedaplatin regimen into definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) as radiosensitizers in patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS The CCRT regimen included docetaxel (5 mg/m2, 10 mg/m2, or 15 mg/m2) and nedaplatin (5 mg/m2, 10 mg/m2, or 15 mg/m2) twice-weekly based on the traditional 3 + 3 dose escalation strategy, and radiotherapy (64 Gy in 32 fractions). The primary goals were to determine the MTD of concurrent chemotherapy and the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs). In-field objective response rate (ORR) was investigated. RESULTS Fifteen patients had been recruited and analyzed. DLT involving persistent grade 3 esophagitis over 1 week was observed in all three patients (3/3) at dose level 3 (15 mg/m2), and two patients (2/6) experienced DLTs in the dose level 2 (10 mg/m2) due to esophageal fistula and persistent grade 3 esophagitis over 1 week, while one patient (1/6) treated at dose level 1 (5 mg/m2) exhibited DLT owing to Grade 3 increased liver enzymes, suggesting a MTD of 5 mg/m2. The in-filed ORR was both 100% in all patients and those receiving MTD. The 1-year loco-regional recurrence-free survival rate was 83.3%, 83.3% and 66.7% in dose level 1, 2, and 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The MTD of twice-weekly docetaxel and nedaplatin regimen was 5 mg/m2 in inoperable ESCC patients treated with definitive CCRT. Low dose concurrent docetaxel and nedaplatin showed promising radiosensitizing effect on in-filed disease control and good tolerability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nai-Bin Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qi-Wen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Su Li
- Clinical Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Su-Ping Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying-Jia Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhangkai J Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ji-Bin Li
- Clinical Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Da-Quan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fang-Jie Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin-Lei Ai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Nan Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bo Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Elsherif SB, Andreou S, Virarkar M, Soule E, Gopireddy DR, Bhosale PR, Lall C. Role of precision imaging in esophageal cancer. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12:5159-5176. [PMID: 33145093 PMCID: PMC7578477 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.08.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Recent advancements in the management of esophageal cancer have allowed for earlier detection, improved ability to monitor progression, and superior treatment options. These innovations allow treatment teams to formulate more customized management plans and have led to an increase in patient survival rates. For example, in order for the most effective management plan to be constructed, accurate staging must be performed to determine tumor resectability. This article reviews the multimodality imaging approach involved in making a diagnosis, staging, evaluating treatment response and detecting recurrence in esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherif B Elsherif
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.,Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sonia Andreou
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Mayur Virarkar
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Erik Soule
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Priya R Bhosale
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chandana Lall
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Locoregional Residual Esophageal Cancer after Neo-adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery Regarding Anatomic Site and Radiation Target Fields: A Histopathologic Evaluation Study. Ann Surg 2020; 275:e759-e765. [PMID: 32740246 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery establishes a considerable pathologic complete response (pCR) in EC. The aim was to determine site of residual tumor and its prognostic impact. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA High rates of residual tumor in the adventitial region even inside the radiation fields will influence current decision-making. METHODS We evaluated resection specimens with marked target fields from 151 consecutive EC patients treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel and 41.4Gy between 2009 and 2018. RESULTS In radically resected (R0) specimens 19.8% (27/136) had a pCR (ypT0N0) and 14% nearly no response (tumor regression grade: tumor regression grade 4-5). Residual tumor commonly extended in or restricted to the adventitia (43.1%; 47/109), whereas 7.3% was in the mucosa (ypT1a), 16.5% in the submucosa (ypT1b) and 6.4% only in lymph nodes (ypT0N+). Macroscopic residues in R0-specimens of partial responders (tumor regression grade 2-3: N = 90) were found in- and outside the gross tumor volume (GTV) in 33.3% and 8.9%, and only microscopic in- and outside the clinical target volume in 58.9% and 1.1%, respectively. Residual nodal disease was observed proximally and distally to the clinical target volume in 2 and 5 patients, respectively. Disease Free Survival decreased significantly if macroscopic tumor was outside the GTV and in ypT2-4aN+. CONCLUSIONS After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, pCR and ypT1aN0 were seen in a limited number of R0 resected specimens (19.8% and 7.3%, respectively), whereas 6.4% had only nodal disease (yT0N+). Disease Free Survival decreased significantly if macroscopic residue was outside the GTV and in responders with only nodal disease. Therefore, we should be cautious in applying wait and see strategies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Xiang ZQ, Imani S, Hu Y, Ding RL, Pang HW, Chen Y, Fu SZ, Xie F, He WF, Wen QL. Comparison of different images in gross target volume delineating on VX2 nasopharyngeal transplantation tumor models. J Cancer 2020; 11:1104-1114. [PMID: 31956357 PMCID: PMC6959086 DOI: 10.7150/jca.36076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To determine the optimum conditions for diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, we established VX2 rabbit model to delineate gross target volume (GTV) in different imaging methods. Methods: The orthotopic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) was established in sixteen New Zealand rabbits. After 7-days inoculation, the rabbits were examined by CT scanning and then sacrificed for pathological examination. To achieve the best delineation, different GTVs of CT, MRI, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and 18F-FLT PET/CT images were correlated with pathological GTV (GTVp). Results: We found 45% and 60% of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as the optimal SUV threshold for the target volume of NPC in 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-FLT PET/CT images, respectively (GTVFDG45% and GTVFLT60%). Moreover, the GTVMRI and GTVCT were significantly higher than the GTVp (P ≤ 0.05), while the GTVFDG45% and especially GTVFLT60% were similar to the GTVp (R = 0.892 and R = 0.902, respectively; P ≤ 0.001). Conclusions: Notably, the results suggested that 18F-FLT PET/CT could reflect the tumor boundaries more accurately than 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI and CT, which makes 18F-FLT PET-CT more advantageous for the clinical delineation of the target volume in NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhang-Qiang Xiang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China (Z-QX, SI, YH, R-LD, H-WP, S-ZF, FX, W-FH, Q-LW)
| | - Saber Imani
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China (Z-QX, SI, YH, R-LD, H-WP, S-ZF, FX, W-FH, Q-LW)
| | - Yue Hu
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China (Z-QX, SI, YH, R-LD, H-WP, S-ZF, FX, W-FH, Q-LW)
| | - Rui-Lin Ding
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China (Z-QX, SI, YH, R-LD, H-WP, S-ZF, FX, W-FH, Q-LW)
| | - Hao-Wen Pang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China (Z-QX, SI, YH, R-LD, H-WP, S-ZF, FX, W-FH, Q-LW)
| | - Yue Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China (YC)
| | - Shao-Zhi Fu
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China (Z-QX, SI, YH, R-LD, H-WP, S-ZF, FX, W-FH, Q-LW)
| | - Fang Xie
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China (Z-QX, SI, YH, R-LD, H-WP, S-ZF, FX, W-FH, Q-LW)
| | - Wen-Feng He
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China (Z-QX, SI, YH, R-LD, H-WP, S-ZF, FX, W-FH, Q-LW)
| | - Qing-Lian Wen
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China (Z-QX, SI, YH, R-LD, H-WP, S-ZF, FX, W-FH, Q-LW)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vollenbrock SE, Voncken FEM, Bartels LW, Beets-Tan RGH, Bartels-Rutten A. Diffusion-weighted MRI with ADC mapping for response prediction and assessment of oesophageal cancer: A systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2019; 142:17-26. [PMID: 31431376 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim was to perform a systematic review on the value of diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping in the prediction and assessment of response to chemo- and/or radiotherapy in oesophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search was performed on Pubmed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases. Studies that evaluated the ADC for response evaluation before, during or after chemo- and/or radiotherapy were included. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the quality of the included studies. RESULTS Fourteen studies, comprising 516 patients, in which the response to treatment in oesophageal cancer was evaluated on ADC maps were included. Acquisition parameter settings for DW-MRI and ROI placement varied substantially. The reference standard was RECIST or endoscopic assessment in eight non-surgery studies and histopathology after surgery in six studies. A high pre-treatment ADC significantly correlated with good response in three out of 12 studies; conversely, one study reported a significantly higher pre-treatment ADC in poor responders. In five out of eight studies good responders showed a significantly larger relative increase in ADC two weeks after the onset of treatment (range 23-59%) than poor responders (range 1.5-17%). After chemo- and/or radiotherapy ADC results varied considerably, amongst others due to large variation in the interval between completion of therapy and DW-MRI. CONCLUSION DW-MRI for response evaluation to chemo- and/or radiotherapy in oesophageal cancer shows variable methods and results. A large relative ADC increase after two weeks of treatment seems most predictive for good response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie E Vollenbrock
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Francine E M Voncken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lambertus W Bartels
- Image Sciences Institute, Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarieke Bartels-Rutten
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Djuric-Stefanovic A, Jankovic A, Saponjski D, Micev M, Stojanovic-Rundic S, Cosic-Micev M, Pesko P. Analyzing the post-contrast attenuation of the esophageal wall on routine contrast-enhanced MDCT examination can improve the diagnostic accuracy in response evaluation of the squamous cell esophageal carcinoma to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in comparison with the esophageal wall thickness. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:1722-1733. [PMID: 30758534 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-01911-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the accuracy of the multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in the response evaluation of the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) by analyzing the thickness and post-contrast attenuation of the esophageal wall after the nCRT. METHODS Contrast-enhanced (CE)-MDCT examinations in portal venous phase of one hundred patients with locally advanced ESCC who received nCRT and underwent esophageal resection and histopathology assessment of tumor regression grade (TRG) were retrospectively analyzed by measuring the maximal thickness and mean density of the esophageal wall in the segment involved by tumor and visually searching for hyperdense foci within it. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the ROC analysis. RESULTS Average attenuation of the esophageal wall had stronger diagnostic performance for predicting pathologic complete regression (pCR) (AUC = 0.994; p < 0.001) in relation to maximal esophageal wall thickness (AUC = 0.731; p < 0.001). Maximal esophageal wall thickness ≤ 9 mm and average attenuation of the esophageal wall ≤ 64 HU predicted pCR with the sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of 62.5%, 77.9%, and 73%, and 96.9%, 98.5%, and 98%, respectively. Combination of both cutoff values enabled correct assessment of pCR with the 100% accuracy. Visual detection of the hyperdense focus within the esophageal wall predicted pCR with the sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy values of 100%, 94.1%, and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSION Visual analysis and measurement of post-contrast attenuation of the esophageal wall after the nCRT can improve diagnostic accuracy of MDCT in the response evaluation of the ESCC to nCRT in comparison with measuring the esophageal wall thickness.
Collapse
|
11
|
Li QW, Qiu B, Wang B, Wang DL, Yin SH, Yang H, Liu JL, Fu JH, Liu MZ, Xie CM, Liu H. Prediction of pathologic responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study. Dis Esophagus 2018; 31:4259168. [PMID: 29036528 DOI: 10.1093/dote/dox121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in ESCC patients receiving neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), and the efficacy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant CCRT. Twenty-eight locally advanced ESCC patients treated with neoadjuvant CCRT followed by radical resection were prospectively enrolled. DW-MRI was recommended to be performed within 2 weeks before and 4-6 weeks after neoadjuvant CCRT. The calculated ADCs pre- (ADC1) and post- (ADC2) neoadjuvant CCRT, the definite (ΔADC) and percentage changes (ΔADC%) were analyzed for the efficacy of predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant CCRT. Twenty patients had been identified as responders (tumor regression grade 1-2). Among them, ADC2 (3.02 ± 0.84 vs. 2.12 ± 0.44 × 10-3 mm2/s, P = 0.001) and ΔADC (1.22 ± 0.78 vs 0.64 ± 0.26 × 10-3 mm2/s, P = 0.007) were significantly higher than those of nonresponders (tumor regression grade: 3-5). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that ADC2 exhibited an overall accuracy of in 71.4% in predicting pathologic response, with a sensitivity of 60.0%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 50.0%, when 3.04 × 10-3 mm2/s was used as the cutoff value. ADC value could be useful in predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant CCRT in ESCC patients. High postneoadjuvant CCRT ADC is a predictive indicator for good response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Q-W Li
- Departments of Radiation Oncology
| | - B Qiu
- Departments of Radiation Oncology
| | - B Wang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology
| | | | - S-H Yin
- Departments of Medical Imaging
| | | | - J-L Liu
- Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | | | - M-Z Liu
- Departments of Radiation Oncology
| | - C-M Xie
- Departments of Medical Imaging
| | - H Liu
- Departments of Radiation Oncology
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Huang TC, Hsu CH. On predicting clinical response to chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: additional evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging may help. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2018; 5:487. [PMID: 29299449 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.09.38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ta-Chen Huang
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Hung Hsu
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Medical physics in radiation Oncology: New challenges, needs and roles. Radiother Oncol 2017; 125:375-378. [PMID: 29150160 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
14
|
Ye Z, Fang J, Dai S, Xie T, Wang F, Wang Z, Li K, Fu Z, Wang Y. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of ADC measurements in esophageal carcinoma primary tumors. Oncotarget 2017; 8:92880-92889. [PMID: 29190963 PMCID: PMC5696229 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2017] [Accepted: 08/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The apparent diffuse coefficient (ADC) may correlate with the treatment response to chemotherapy/radiotherapy in solid tumors. Our aim was to determine the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of ADC measurements in primary esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). ADCs were blindly measured in 31 patients diagnosed with ESCC by two observers before treatment (pre-ADC) and after 5th fraction radiotherapy (intra-ADC) twice with a 2-week interval. The mean pre-ADC of primary tumors was 1.25±0.22 and 1.27±0.23 (in 10−3mm2/s) from observer A for measurements 1 and 2, respectively, and the intra-observer measurements were -0.02 bias vs. -0.13-0.09 limits of agreement. From observer B, the mean pre-ADC varied between 1.25±0.23 and 1.27±0.23 (in 10−3mm2/s) for measurements 1 and 2, respectively, and intra-observer measurements were -0.02 bias vs. -0.17∼0.16 limits of agreement. The mean pre-ADC of primary tumors was 1.26±0.24 (in 10−3mm2/s) from observers A and B, and inter-observer measurements were 0.01 bias vs. -0.09-0.09 limits of agreement, revealing a low inter-observer variance. Similar measurements of the intra-SD parameters showed that the pre- and intra-ADC of primary tumors differed significantly. Thus ADC measurements may have sufficient inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility to measure primary tumor responses to treatment, and the ADCs before and during treatment differed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhimin Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jun Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shujun Dai
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Tieming Xie
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Fangzheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Kai Li
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhenfu Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuezhen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Liu S, Qiu B, Luo G, Liang Y, Zheng Y, Chen Z, Luo K, Xi M, Liu Q, Hu Y, Li Q, Fu J, Liu M, Yang H, Liu H. TNM Staging Matched-pair Comparison of Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy, Surgery Alone and Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Cancer 2017; 8:683-690. [PMID: 28367248 PMCID: PMC5370512 DOI: 10.7150/jca.17048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2016] [Accepted: 11/16/2016] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: We used the TNM staging matched-pair approach to compare the efficacies of surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCT), surgery alone and definitive chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with localized advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: A total of 642 patients with ESCC from previous studies were studied. Patients whose treatment involved NCT + surgery and surgery alone were compared with patients receiving CCRT. Prospensity score matched-pair comparison based on pre-treatment TNM staging was developed to assess the efficacies of these treatment options. Results: Prospensity score matched-pair comparison to control for bias generated a cohort of 274 patients who were eligible for comparison. The 3-year OS rate was 70.0% in the NCT + surgery group, compared to 51.7% in the surgery group (p=0.000) and 61.9% in the CCRT group (p=0.082). With the TNM staging matched-pair approach, the CCRT group had more upper thoracic ESCC patients (43/92, 46.7%), while the surgery group had more lower thoracic ESCC patients (37/92, 40.2%). The 3-year OS rates were comparable between the surgery alone group and CCRT group (p=0.109). Conclusions: NCT plus surgery was superior in OS to surgery alone or CCRT. The 3-year OS rates were comparable between the surgery alone group and CCRT group with TNM staging matched-pair approach. Further investigation is warranted to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ShiLiang Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China;; Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China;; Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - Bo Qiu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China;; Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China;; Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - GuangYu Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China;; Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China;; Department of Endoscopy
| | - Ying Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China;; Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China;; Department of Medical Oncology
| | - YuZhen Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China;; Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China;; Department of Thoracic Surgery
| | - ZhaoLin Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China;; Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China;; Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - KongJia Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China;; Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China;; Department of Thoracic Surgery
| | - Mian Xi
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China;; Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China;; Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - Qing Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China;; Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China;; Department of Clinical Statistics, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China
| | - YongHong Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China;; Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China;; Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - Qun Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China;; Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China;; Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - JianHua Fu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China;; Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China;; Department of Thoracic Surgery
| | - MengZhong Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China;; Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China;; Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - Hong Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China;; Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China;; Department of Thoracic Surgery
| | - Hui Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China;; Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China;; Department of Radiation Oncology
| |
Collapse
|