1
|
Gallamini A, Filippi A, Camus V, Vassilakopoulos TP. Toward a paradigm shift in prognostication and treatment of early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2024. [PMID: 39039814 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
Twenty years after the conceptual revolution that occurred in the millennium turnaround upon the introduction of PET/CT in lymphoma staging, restaging, and prognostication, a number of new parameters for PET reading have been proposed: (1) the shift from a qualitative to a semi-quantitative reading for PET reporting, (2) an international consensus on these novel interpretation keys, (3) a standardized and agreed procedure to measure the total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV), and (4) the proposition of new indexes to portray the tumour spread: (D-Max and Total Lesion Surface -TLS). These proved to be very powerful prognosticators, able to revolutionize the traditional Ann Arbor four-stage lymphoma staging. During the 17° Lugano meeting on lymphoma, one main question was asked to experts attending a closed workshop dedicated to new metrics for lymphoma diagnosis, staging, restaging, and prognostication: "Should the traditional 4-stage anatomic staging system be simplified to a more clinically relevant 2-stage system (e.g., limited vs. extensive disease)?" Early-stage HL is an example of how these new metrics could fit with this proposal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Gallamini
- Research and Clinical Innovation, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, Nice, France
| | - Andrea Filippi
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincent Camus
- Institute of Oncology Research, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Department of Haematology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Theodoros P Vassilakopoulos
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Laikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ollivier L, Laprie A, Jouglar E, Claude L, Martin V, Muracciole X, Padovani L, Supiot S, Escande A. [Characteristics of radiotherapy for adolescents and young adults]. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:736-745. [PMID: 38652674 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Radiotherapy for adolescents and young adults is complex in several aspects. The population is very heterogeneous and has characteristics derived from both paediatric and adult populations both in terms of pathology (anatomical pathology, response to treatment) and the patient's physical, biological and psychological characteristics. This article reviews the characteristics to be taken into account in adolescent and young adult patients radiotherapy and more particularly in some of the most common diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Ollivier
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Saint-Herblain, France
| | - A Laprie
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, oncopole institut Claudius-Regaud, institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse, université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
| | - E Jouglar
- Département de radiothérapie, institut Curie, université Paris Science et Lettres, Paris, France
| | - L Claude
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - V Martin
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - X Muracciole
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, Assistance publique-hôpitaux de Marseille, CHU La Timone, CHU Nord, Marseille, France
| | - L Padovani
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, Assistance publique-hôpitaux de Marseille, CHU La Timone, CHU Nord, Marseille, France
| | - S Supiot
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Saint-Herblain, France
| | - A Escande
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Léonard-de-Vinci, Dechy, France; Laboratoire CRIStAL, UMR 9186, université de Lille, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brincker M, Jensen I, Rechner LA, Schut DA, Johansen TS, Nielsen M, Thomsen JB. Multi-center comparison between proton and photon plans for mediastinal lymphomas. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1251-1255. [PMID: 37624751 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2251089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mads Brincker
- Department of Medical Physics, Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ingelise Jensen
- Department of Medical Physics, Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Laura Ann Rechner
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Radiotherapy Research Unit, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Deborah Anne Schut
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Morten Nielsen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jakob Borup Thomsen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jones DA, Candio P, Shakir R, Ramroth J, Wolstenholme J, Gray AM, Cutter DJ, Ntentas G. Individualised Estimation of Quality-adjusted Survival Benefit and Cost-effectiveness of Proton Beam Therapy in Intermediate-stage Hodgkin Lymphoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:301-310. [PMID: 36732121 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma leads to the irradiation of organs at risk (OAR), which may confer excess risks of late effects. Comparative dosimetry studies show that proton beam therapy (PBT) may reduce OAR irradiation compared with photon radiotherapy, but PBT is more expensive and treatment capacity is limited. The purpose of this study is to inform the appropriateness of PBT for intermediate-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (ISHL). MATERIALS AND METHODS A microsimulation model simulating the course of ISHL, background mortality and late effects was used to estimate comparative quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lived and healthcare costs after consolidative pencil beam scanning PBT or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), both in deep-inspiration breath-hold. Outcomes were compared for 606 illustrative patients covering a spectrum of clinical presentations, varying by two age strata (20 and 40 years), both sexes, three smoking statuses (never, former and current) and 61 pairs of OAR radiation doses from a comparative planning study. Both undiscounted and discounted outcomes at 3.5% yearly discount were estimated. The maximum excess cost of PBT that might be considered cost-effective by the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence was calculated. RESULTS OAR doses, smoking status and discount rate had large impacts on QALYs gained with PBT. Current smokers benefited the most, averaging 0.605 undiscounted QALYs (range -0.341 to 2.171) and 0.146 discounted QALYs (range -0.067 to 0.686), whereas never smokers benefited the least, averaging 0.074 undiscounted QALYs (range -0.196 to 0.491) and 0.017 discounted QALYs (range -0.030 to 0.086). For the gain in discounted QALYs to be considered cost-effective, PBT would have to cost at most £4812 more than VMAT for current smokers and £645 more for never smokers. This is below preliminary National Health Service cost estimates of PBT over photon radiotherapy. CONCLUSION In a UK setting, PBT for ISHL may not be considered cost-effective. However, the degree of unquantifiable uncertainty is substantial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D A Jones
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.
| | - P Candio
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Department of Economics and Management, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - R Shakir
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK
| | - J Ramroth
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK
| | - J Wolstenholme
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK
| | - A M Gray
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK
| | - D J Cutter
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK; Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - G Ntentas
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK; Department of Medical Physics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Levis M, Campbell BA, Matrone F, Grapulin L, Di Russo A, Buglione M, Iamundo De Cumis I, Simontacchi G, Ciammella P, Magli A, Pascale G, Meregalli S, MacManus M, Fanetti G, De Felice F, Furfaro G, Ciccone G, Ricardi U. Peritransplant Radiation Therapy in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplant: Long-Term Results of a Retrospective Study of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(23)00165-7. [PMID: 36822373 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this multicenter collaboration, we report real-world data in the largest published series of long-term outcomes for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treated with peritransplant radiation therapy (pt-RT) and high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a retrospective analysis including data from 12 institutions. Eligibility required histologic diagnosis of HL, receipt of ASCT plus pt-RT between 2004 and 2014 for r/r HL, and age ≥18 years at the time of ASCT. All patients received salvage chemotherapy for maximum debulking before ASCT. Metabolic responses were scored according to the Lugano Classification. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards were calculated to estimate the effect of covariates on patients' outcome. RESULTS One hundred thirty-one patients were eligible: 68 were male (52%), and median age at ASCT was 32 years (range, 18-70). At the time of diagnosis with r/r HL, 92 patients (70%) had limited (stage I-II) disease, and 10 patients (8%) had bulky disease. Pt-RT was given pre-ASCT in 32 patients (24%) and post-ASCT in 99 (76%); median prescribed dose was 30.6 Gy (range, 20-44 Gy). With median follow-up of 60 months, 3- and 5-year OS were 84% and 77%, while 3- and 5-year progression-free survival were 75% and 72%, respectively. On univariate and multivariate analysis, advanced stage at relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 2.18; P = .04), irradiation of >3 sites (HR, 3.69; P = .01), and incomplete metabolic response after salvage chemotherapy (HR, 2.24; P = .01) had a negative effect on OS. The sequencing of pt-RT (pre- vs post-ASCT) did not affect outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the addition of pt-RT to ASCT for patients with r/r HL is associated with very good outcomes. Limited relapsed disease with ≤3 sites involved and achievement of complete metabolic response after salvage chemotherapy were predictive of more favorable prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Levis
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
| | - Belinda A Campbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Fabio Matrone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (CRO-IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Lavinia Grapulin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Di Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Michela Buglione
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Ilenia Iamundo De Cumis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Hospital A. Businco, ARNAS G. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gabriele Simontacchi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy
| | - Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (USL-IRCCS) di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Magli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Giuliana Pascale
- Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Sofia Meregalli
- Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | - Michael MacManus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Giuseppe Fanetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (CRO-IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giovannino Ciccone
- Clinical Epidemiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza and Centro Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO) Piemonte, Torino, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Patel CG, Peterson J, Aznar M, Tseng YD, Lester S, Pafundi D, Flampouri S, Mohindra P, Parikh RR, Mailhot Vega R, Konig L, Plastaras JP, Bates JE, Loap P, Kirova YM, Orlandi E, Lütgendorf-Caucig C, Ntentas G, Hoppe B. Systematic review for deep inspiration breath hold in proton therapy for mediastinal lymphoma: A PTCOG Lymphoma Subcommittee report and recommendations. Radiother Oncol 2022; 177:21-32. [PMID: 36252635 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To systematically review all dosimetric studies investigating the impact of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) compared with free breathing (FB) in mediastinal lymphoma patients treated with proton therapy as compared to IMRT (intensity-modulated radiation therapy)-DIBH. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline using the PubMed database to identify studies of mediastinal lymphoma patients with dosimetric comparisons of proton-FB and/or proton-DIBH with IMRT-DIBH. Parameters included mean heart (MHD), lung (MLD), and breast (MBD) doses, among other parameters. Case reports were excluded. Absolute differences in mean doses > 1 Gy between comparators were considered to be clinically meaningful. RESULTS As of April 2021, eight studies fit these criteria (n = 8), with the following comparisons: proton-FB vs IMRT-DIBH (n = 5), proton-DIBH vs proton-FB (n = 5), and proton-DIBH vs IMRT-DIBH (n = 8). When comparing proton-FB with IMRT-DIBH in 5 studies, MHD was reduced with proton-FB in 2 studies, was similar (<1 Gy difference) in 2 studies, and increased in 1 study. On the other hand, MLD and MBD were reduced with proton-FB in 3 and 4 studies, respectively. When comparing proton-DIBH with proton-FB, MHD and MLD were reduced with proton DIBH in 4 and 3 studies, respectively, while MBD remained similar. Compared with IMRT-DIBH in 8 studies, proton-DIBH reduced the MHD in 7 studies and was similar in 1 study. Furthermore, MLD and MBD were reduced with proton-DIBH in 8 and 6 studies respectively. Integral dose was similar between proton-FB and proton-DIBH, and both were substantially lower than IMRT-DIBH. CONCLUSION Accounting for heart, lung, breast, and integral dose, proton therapy (FB or DIBH) was superior to IMRT-DIBH. Proton-DIBH can lower dose to the lungs and heart even further compared with proton-FB, depending on disease location in the mediastinum, and organ-sparing and target coverage priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirayu G Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
| | | | - Marianne Aznar
- University of Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Yolanda D Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | | | | | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | - Pranshu Mohindra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Rahul R Parikh
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Department of Radiation Oncology, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Raymond Mailhot Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainsville, Florida, USA
| | - Laila Konig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Centre (HIT); National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - John P Plastaras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James E Bates
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | - Pierre Loap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Youlia M Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Ester Orlandi
- National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Georgios Ntentas
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Medical Physics, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maraldo MV, Levis M, Andreis A, Armenian S, Bates J, Brady J, Ghigo A, Lyon AR, Manisty C, Ricardi U, Aznar MC, Filippi AR. An integrated approach to cardioprotection in lymphomas. Lancet Haematol 2022; 9:e445-e454. [PMID: 35512725 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(22)00082-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
In potentially curable cancers, long-term survival depends not only on the successful treatment of the malignancy but also on the risks associated with treatment-related toxicity, especially cardiotoxicity. Malignant lymphomas affect patients at any age, with acute and late toxicity risks that could have a severe effect on morbidity, mortality, and quality of life. Although our understanding of chemotherapy-associated and radiotherapy-associated cardiovascular disease has advanced considerably, new drugs with potential cardiotoxicity have been introduced for the treatment of lymphomas. In this Review, we summarise the mechanisms of treatment-related cardiac injury, available clinical data, and protocols for optimising cardioprotection in lymphomas. We discuss ongoing research strategies to advance our knowledge of the molecular basis of drug-induced and radiation-induced toxicity. Additionally, we emphasise the potential for personalised follow-up and early detection, including the role of biomarkers and novel diagnostic tests, highlighting the role of the cardio-oncology team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja V Maraldo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mario Levis
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alessandro Andreis
- Division of Cardiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Saro Armenian
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - James Bates
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jessica Brady
- Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alessandra Ghigo
- Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Alexander R Lyon
- Imperial College London and Cardio-oncology Service, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Manisty
- Department of Cardio-oncology, Barts Heart Centre and University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Marianne C Aznar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester and Department of Radiotherapy-Related Research, The Christie NHS, Manchester, UK.
| | - Andrea Riccardo Filippi
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ntentas G, Dedeckova K, Andrlik M, Aznar MC, Shakir R, Ramroth J, Begum R, Kubeš J, Darby SC, Mikhaeel NG, Cutter DJ. Proton Therapy in Supradiaphragmatic Lymphoma: Predicting Treatment-Related Mortality to Help Optimize Patient Selection. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 112:913-925. [PMID: 34762970 PMCID: PMC8865523 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.10.151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In some patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), proton beam therapy (PBT) may reduce the risk of radiation-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) and second cancers (SC) compared with photon radiation therapy (RT). Our aim was to identify patients who benefit the most from PBT in terms of predicted 30-year absolute mortality risks (AMR30) from CVD and SC, taking into account individual background, chemotherapy, radiation, and smoking-related risks. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eighty patients with supradiaphragmatic HL treated with PBT between 2015 and 2019 were replanned using optimal photon RT. To identify patients predicted to derive the greatest benefit from PBT compared with photon RT, doses and AMR30 from CVD and SC of the lung, breast, and esophagus were compared for all patients and across patient subgroups. RESULTS For patients with mediastinal disease below the origin of the left main coronary artery (n = 66; 82%), PBT reduced the mean dose to the heart, left ventricle, and heart valves by 1.0, 2.7, and 3.6 Gy, respectively. Based on U.S. mortality rates, PBT reduced CVD AMR30 by 0.2%, from 5.9% to 5.7%. The benefit was larger if the mediastinal disease overlapped longitudinally with the heart by ≥40% (n = 23; 29%). PBT reduced the mean dose to the heart, left ventricle, and heart valves by 3.2, 5.6, and 5.1 Gy, respectively, and reduced CVD AMR30 by 0.8%, from 7.0% to 6.2%. For patients with axillary disease (n = 25; 31%), PBT reduced the mean lung dose by 2.8 Gy and lung cancer AMR30 by 0.6%, from 2.7% to 2.1%. Breast and esophageal doses were also lower with PBT, but the effects on AMR30 were negligible. The effect of smoking on CVD and lung cancer AMR30 was much larger than radiation and chemotherapy and the differences between radiation modalities. CONCLUSIONS The predicted benefit of PBT is not universal and limited to certain categories of patients with lymphoma and lower mediastinal or axillary disease. Smoking cessation should be strongly encouraged in smokers who require thoracic RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Ntentas
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Medical Physics, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Katerina Dedeckova
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Marianne C Aznar
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Shakir
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Cancer Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Johanna Ramroth
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Rubina Begum
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Medical Physics, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jiří Kubeš
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Sarah C Darby
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - N George Mikhaeel
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - David J Cutter
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Cancer Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Baues C, Goergen H, Fuchs M, Rosenbrock J, Celik E, Eich H, Kobe C, Voltin CA, Engert A, Borchmann P, Marnitz S. Involved-Field Radiation Therapy Prevents Recurrences in the Early Stages of Hodgkin Lymphoma in PET-Negative Patients After ABVD Chemotherapy: Relapse Analysis of GHSG Phase 3 HD16 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:900-906. [PMID: 34389407 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The HD16 trial of the German Hodgkin Study Group (NCT00736320) demonstrated that radiation therapy in early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma without risk factors cannot be safely omitted, and therefore combined modality therapy (CMT) remains the standard treatment. To demonstrate the local effect of consolidating involved-field radiation therapy (IF-RT), we performed an analysis of the recurrence pattern of positron emission tomography (PET)-negative HD16 patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 2009 and 2015, 1150 patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma without risk factors were randomly assigned to PET guided to 20 Gy IF-RT after 2 cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine chemotherapy in the HD16 study of the German Hodgkin Study Group. The study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial. We correlated the localization of recurrence with the panel-based IF-RT plan, which was drawn up for all patients prospectively, blinded to treatment allocation. Accordingly, we were able to identify recurrences that occurred at least in part inside or outside of the (potential) radiation field (in-field and out-field, respectively). RESULTS There were 328 and 300 PET-negative patients assigned to CMT and PET-guided treatment (ie, chemotherapy alone), respectively. Within a median 47-month follow-up, disease progression or recurrence was documented for 15 and 29 patients treated with and without IF-RT, respectively. Relapse localization was unknown in 1 CMT patient. Without IF-RT, 5-year incidence of in-field relapses was 10.5% (95% confidence interval, 6.5-14.6) compared with 2.4% (0.5-4.3) with CMT (P = .0008). There were no relevant differences in out-field recurrences (5-year incidence 4.1% [1.7-6.6] vs 6.6% [3.0-10.3], P = .54). There was no grade 4 toxicity observed during IF-RT, and incidence of second primary malignancies was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS PET-negative patients of the HD16 study showed no significant toxicity after 20 Gy IF-RT, and we demonstrated that omission of IF-RT resulted in more, particularly local, recurrences. Therefore, consolidation IF-RT should still be considered as standard therapy in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Baues
- Department of Radiooncology, Radiotherapy and Cyberknife Center; German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG).
| | | | - Michael Fuchs
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Johannes Rosenbrock
- Department of Radiooncology, Radiotherapy and Cyberknife Center; German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG)
| | - Eren Celik
- Department of Radiooncology, Radiotherapy and Cyberknife Center
| | - Hans Eich
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Conrad-Amadeus Voltin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiooncology, Radiotherapy and Cyberknife Center; German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Role of radiotherapy to bulky sites of advanced Hodgkin lymphoma treated with ABVD: final results of FIL HD0801 trial. Blood Adv 2021; 5:4504-4514. [PMID: 34597375 PMCID: PMC8579271 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of consolidation radiotherapy (RT) for bulky lesions is controversial in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma who achieve complete metabolic response (CMR) after doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD)-based chemotherapy. We present the final results of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi HD0801 trial, which investigated the potential benefit of RT in that setting. In this phase 3 randomized study, patients with a bulky lesion at baseline (a mass with largest diameter ≥5 cm) who have CMR after 2 and 6 ABVD cycles were randomly assigned 1:1 to RT vs observation (OBS) with a primary endpoint of event-free survival (EFS) at 2 years. The sample size was calculated estimating an EFS improvement for RT of 20% (from 60% to 80%). The secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). One hundred sixteen patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to RT or OBS. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed a 2-year EFS of 87.8% vs 85.8% for RT vs OBS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-3.5; P = .34). At 2 years, ITT-PFS was 91.3% vs 85.8% (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.5-3; P = .7). Patients in CMR randomly assigned to OBS had a good outcome, and the primary end point of a 20% benefit in EFS for RT was not met. However, the sample size was underpowered to detect a benefit of 10% or less, keeping open the question of a potential, more limited role of RT in this setting. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00784537.
Collapse
|
11
|
Milgrom SA, Rechner L, Berthelsen A. The optimal use of PET/CT in the management of lymphoma patients. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20210470. [PMID: 34415777 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scans play an important role in the management of lymphoma patients. They are critical to accurately stage disease and assess its response to therapy. In addition, PET/CT scans enable precise target delineation for radiation therapy planning. In this review, we describe the use of PET/CT scans in lymphoma, with a focus on their role in staging disease, assessing response to therapy, predicting prognosis, and planning RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura Rechner
- Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Berthelsen
- Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Petersen PM, Mikhaeel NG, Ricardi U, Brady JL. Harnessing benefit of highly conformal RT techniques for lymphoma patients. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20210469. [PMID: 34379521 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
This status article describes current state-of-the-art radiotherapy for lymphomas and new emerging techniques. Current state-of-the-art radiotherapy is sophisticated, individualised, CT-based, intensity-modulated treatment, using PET/CT to define the target. The concept of involved site radiotherapy should be used, delineating the target using the exact same principles as for solid tumours. The optimal treatment delivery includes motion management and online treatment verification systems, which reduce intra- and interfractional anatomical variation. Emerging radiotherapy techniques in lymphomas include adaptive radiotherapy in MR- and CT-based treatment systems and proton therapy. The next generation linear accelerators have the capability to deliver adaptive treatment and allow relatively quick online adaptation to the daily variations of the anatomy. The computer systems use machine leaning to facilitate rapid automatic contouring of the target and organs-at-risk. Moreover, emerging MR-based planning and treatment facilities allow target definition directly from MR scans and allow intra-fractional tracking of structures recognisable on MR. Proton facilities are now being widely implemented. The benefits of proton therapy are due to the physical properties of protons, which in many cases allow sparing of normal tissue. The variety of techniques in modern radiotherapy means that the radiation oncologist must be able to choose the right technique for each patient. The choice is mainly based on experience and standard protocols, but new systems calculating risks for the patients with a specific treatment plan and also systems integrating clinical factors and risk factors into the planning process itself are emerging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Meidahl Petersen
- Department of Oncology, The Finsen Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - N George Mikhaeel
- Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jessica L Brady
- Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques for Mediastinal Lymphomas: Results from an Italian Survey. HEMATO 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/hemato2030031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background: Multiple methods have been implemented to limit the impact of radiotherapy on patients affected by mediastinal lymphoma, including breathing control techniques, image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), although the actual diffusion of such techniques is unclear. No surveys have been published to date evaluating the techniques adopted at different centers. Methods: A survey with a dedicated questionnaire was submitted to 195 Italian radiotherapy centers, assessing items regarding the characteristics of the center and clinical practice in the treatment of mediastinal lymphomas. Results: A total of 43 centers (22%) responded, the majority of which were university hospitals (37.2%) or cancer care centers (27.9%). In 95.4% of the centers, IMRT was used in the clinical practice, and the most frequently employed techniques were VMAT (48.8% of centers) and non-rotational IMRT (31.7%). Comparison of multiple plans was performed by 66.7% of the responding centers. Dose constraints for organs at risk were consistently prescribed. IGRT techniques were adopted by 93% of the centers, while breathing control or gating techniques were routinely used by only 25.6% of the centers. A necessity to standardize OAR constraints and define guidelines was perceived by almost all participants. Conclusions: Modern radiotherapy techniques are widely used in the Italian centers, although with heterogeneous characteristics.
Collapse
|
14
|
Development and Implementation of Proton Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: Challenges and Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153744. [PMID: 34359644 PMCID: PMC8345082 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable disease; proton therapy for mediastinal HL irradiation might theoretically reduce late toxicities compared with classical radiotherapy techniques. However, optimal patient selection for this technique is subject to debate. While implementation at a larger scale of proton therapy for HL may face organizational, political, and societal challenges, new highly effective systematic drugs are being widely evaluated for this disease. Abstract Consolidative radiation therapy for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) improves progression-free survival. Unfortunately, first-generation techniques, relying on large irradiation fields, were associated with an increased risk of secondary cancers, and of cardiac and lung toxicity. Fortunately, the use of smaller target volumes combined with technological advances in treatment techniques currently allows efficient organs-at-risk sparing without altering tumoral control. Recently, proton therapy has been evaluated for mediastinal HL treatment due to its potential to significantly reduce the dose to organs-at-risk, such as cardiac substructures. This is expected to limit late radiation-induced toxicity and possibly, second-neoplasm risk, compared with last-generation intensity-modulated radiation therapy. However, the democratization of this new technique faces multiple issues. Determination of which patient may benefit the most from proton therapy is subject to intense debate. The development of new effective systemic chemotherapy and organizational, societal, and political considerations might represent impediments to the larger-scale implementation of HL proton therapy. Based on the current literature, this critical review aims to discuss current challenges and controversies that may impede the larger-scale implementation of mediastinal HL proton therapy.
Collapse
|
15
|
Current Situation of Proton Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: From Expectations to Evidence. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153746. [PMID: 34359647 PMCID: PMC8345146 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Consolidative radiation therapy (RT) is of prime importance for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) management since it significantly increases progression-free survival (PFS). Nevertheless, first-generation techniques, relying on large irradiation fields, delivered significant radiation doses to critical organs-at-risk (OARs, such as the heart, to the lung or the breasts) when treating mediastinal HL; consequently, secondary cancers, and cardiac and lung toxicity were substantially increased. Fortunately, HL RT has drastically evolved and, nowadays, state-of-the-art RT techniques efficiently spare critical organs-at-risks without altering local control or overall survival. Recently, proton therapy has been evaluated for mediastinal HL treatment, due to its possibility to significantly reduce integral dose to OARs, which is expected to limit second neoplasm risk and reduce late toxicity. Nevertheless, clinical experience for this recent technique is still limited worldwide. Based on current literature, this critical review aims to examine the current practice of proton therapy for mediastinal HL irradiation.
Collapse
|
16
|
Bates JE, Terezakis S, Morris CG, Rao AD, Sehgal S, Kumar R, Mailhot Vega RB, Mendenhall NP, Hoppe BS. Comparative Effectiveness of Proton Therapy versus Photon Radiotherapy in Adolescents and Young Adults for Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:21-27. [PMID: 35127972 PMCID: PMC8768899 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-21-00011.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Early stage (stages I-II) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is a highly curable disease typically diagnosed in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Proton therapy can also reduce the late toxicity burden in this population, but data on its comparative efficacy with photon radiotherapy in this population are sparse. We assessed outcomes in AYAs with cHL in a multi-institution retrospective review. Materials and Methods We identified 94 patients aged 15 to 40 years with stages I and II cHL treated with radiotherapy as part of their initial treatment between 2008 and 2017. We used Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank testing to evaluate survival differences between groups of patients. Results A total of 91 patients were included in the analysis. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 89%. Of the 12 patients who experienced progression after radiotherapy, 4 occurred out-of-field, 2 occurred in-field, and 6 experienced both in- and out-of-field progression. There was no significant difference in 2-year PFS among AYA patients by radiotherapy dose received (≥ 30 Gy, 91%; < 30 Gy, 86%; P = .82). Likewise, there was no difference in 2-year PFS among patients who received either proton or photon radiotherapy (proton, 94%; photon, 83%; P = .07). Conclusion Our cohort of AYA patients had comparable outcomes regardless of radiotherapy dose or modality used. For patients with significant risk of radiation-induced late effects, proton therapy is a reasonable treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E. Bates
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Stephanie Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Christopher G. Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Avani D. Rao
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shuchi Sehgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rahul Kumar
- School of Medical Sciences & Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida, India
| | | | - Nancy P. Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Bradford S. Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
The risk of late effects following pediatric and adult radiotherapy regimens in Hodgkin lymphoma. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 197:711-721. [PMID: 33300098 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01721-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adolescent young adults (AYA) with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are treated according to either pediatric or adult protocols, however, the best strategy has yet to be established. We describe the AYA patients referred for radiotherapy and quantify the risk of radiation-induced late effects and the corresponding life years lost (LYL) following pediatric and adult regimens. METHODS Patients ≤24 years irradiated for HL were included. For each patient, organs at risk (OARs) were contoured and dosimetric parameters were extracted. Estimated excess hazard ratios of radiation-induced late effects were calculated from dose-response models and LYL attributable to various late effects were estimated. RESULTS In total, 77 patients were analyzed (pediatric regimen: 15; adult regimen: 62). Age, clinical stage, and the number of patients enrolled in protocols were significantly different between the groups. Pediatric patients had more advanced disease, which resulted in larger target volumes and higher doses to most OARs, despite a lower prescribed dose compared to adult regimens. LYL estimates were all higher with the pediatric regimens. Total LYL with pediatric and adult treatment regimens were 3.2 years and 2.3 years, respectively. Due to the clinical stage variation and heterogeneity in disease location, a direct comparison of the estimated risks of late effects was only exploratory. CONCLUSION Pediatric regimens selected patients with more advanced disease to radiotherapy resulting in larger target volumes and higher doses to the OARs. Target volume rather than prescribed dose impacted OAR exposure. Consequently, the estimated risk of radiation-induced late effects and corresponding LYL was increased when compared to adult regimens.
Collapse
|
18
|
Moreno AC, Gunther JR, Milgrom S, Fuller CD, Williamson T, Liu A, Wu R, Zhu XR, Dabaja BS, Pinnix CC. Effect of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold on Normal Tissue Sparing With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Proton Therapy for Mediastinal Lymphoma. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:1255-1266. [PMID: 33305086 PMCID: PMC7718527 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Intensity modulated radiation therapy delivered with deep-inspiration breath hold (IMRT-BH) provides favorable normal tissue dosimetric profiles when treating patients with mediastinal lymphoma. However, it is unclear if IMRT-BH plans are comparable to free breathing (FB) proton plans. We performed a retrospective, comparative dosimetric study between IMRT-BH and FB passive scatter proton therapy (P-FB) or intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT-FB). Hypothesizing that BH would provide superior normal tissue sparing when added to proton therapy, we also compared plans to passive scatter BH (P-BH). METHODS AND MATERIALS For 15 patients who received involved-site RT with "butterfly" IMRT-BH, 3 additional proton plans (P-FB, IMPT-FB, P-BH) were optimized to deliver 30.6 Gy/Gy relative biological effectiveness. Dosimetric variables (mean dose, V30, V25, V15, and V5) for organs at risk (OARs) were calculated and compared using nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS Of 57 studied OAR parameters, IMRT-BH plans were comparable in 37 (65%) parameters with P-FB plans, 32 (56%) of IMPT-FB parameters, and 30 (53%) of P-BH parameters. Doses to breasts were generally equivalent among plans while esophageal dosing was worse with IMRT-BH. Mean doses and V5 of the total lung and heart were the highest with IMRT-BH; however, IMRT-BH resulted in comparable coronary and superior lung V30 relative to proton plans. The addition of BH with proton therapy resulted in the greatest lung sparing, with mean lung dose reductions of 11% to 38%. CONCLUSIONS The use of BH with IMRT reduces the disparity in OAR doses with equivalence achieved in nearly two-thirds of OAR metrics compared with P-FB and 50% compared with IMPT-BH. Because each modality exhibited unique benefits, personalization of modality selection is recommended. Proton therapy via BH provides additional benefits in heart and lung sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy C. Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jillian R. Gunther
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sarah Milgrom
- Department of Radiation Oncology at the University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
| | - C. David Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tyler Williamson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amy Liu
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard Wu
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - X. Ronald Zhu
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bouthaina S. Dabaja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chelsea C. Pinnix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tseng YD, Hoppe BS, Dedeckova K, Patel CG, Hill-Kayser CE, Miller DM, Maity A, Mendenhall NP, Mailhot Vega RB, Yock TI, Baliga S, Hess CB, Winkfield KM, Mohindra P, Rosen LR, Tsai H, Chang J, Hartsell WF, Plastaras JP. Risk of Pneumonitis and Outcomes After Mediastinal Proton Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma: A PTCOG and PCG Collaboration. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:220-230. [PMID: 32866566 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.08.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Revised: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite high response rates, there has been reluctance to use radiation therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) Hodgkin (HL) or aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) given concerns for subacute and late toxicities. Symptomatic pneumonitis, a subacute toxicity, has an incidence of 17% to 24% (≥grade 2) even with intensity modulated radiation therapy. Proton therapy (PT), which has no exit radiation dose, is associated with a lower dose to lung compared with other radiation techniques. As risk of radiation pneumonitis is associated with lung dose, we evaluated whether pneumonitis rates are lower with PT. METHODS AND MATERIALS Within an international, multi-institutional cohort, we retrospectively evaluated the incidence and grade of radiation pneumonitis (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4) among patients with r/r HL or NHL treated with PT. RESULTS A total of 85 patients with r/r lymphoma (66% HL, 34% NHL; 46% primary chemorefractory) received thoracic PT from 2009 to 2017 in the consolidation (45%) or salvage (54%) setting. Median dose was 36 Gy(RBE). Before PT, patients underwent a median of 1 salvage systemic therapy (range, 0-4); 40% received PT within 4 months of transplant. With a median follow-up of 26.3 months among living patients, 11 patients developed symptomatic (grade 2) pneumonitis (12.8%). No grade 3 or higher pneumonitis was observed. Dose to lung, including mean lung dose, lung V5, and V20, significantly predicted risk of symptomatic pneumonitis, but not receipt of brentuximab, history of bleomycin toxicity, sex, or peritransplant radiation. CONCLUSIONS PT for relapsed/refractory lymphoma was associated with favorable rates of pneumonitis compared with historical controls. We confirm that among patients treated with PT, pneumonitis risk is associated with mean lung and lung V20 dose. These findings highlight how advancements in radiation delivery may improve the therapeutic ratio for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma. PT may be considered as a treatment modality for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma in the consolidation or salvage setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda D Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Proton Collaborative Group Registry Membership Site, Warrenville, Illinois.
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | - Chirayu G Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Christine E Hill-Kayser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David M Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Amit Maity
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nancy P Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Raymond B Mailhot Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Clayton B Hess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Karen M Winkfield
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Pranshu Mohindra
- Proton Collaborative Group Registry Membership Site, Warrenville, Illinois; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine and Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lane R Rosen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Willis-Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, Lousiana
| | - Henry Tsai
- Proton Collaborative Group Registry Membership Site, Warrenville, Illinois; Procure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey
| | - John Chang
- Proton Collaborative Group Registry Membership Site, Warrenville, Illinois; Oklahoma Proton Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - William F Hartsell
- Proton Collaborative Group Registry Membership Site, Warrenville, Illinois; Northwestern Medicine Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois
| | - John P Plastaras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
König L, Haering P, Lang C, Splinter M, von Nettelbladt B, Weykamp F, Hoegen P, Lischalk JW, Herfarth K, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. Secondary Malignancy Risk Following Proton vs. X-ray Treatment of Mediastinal Malignant Lymphoma: A Comparative Modeling Study of Thoracic Organ-Specific Cancer Risk. Front Oncol 2020; 10:989. [PMID: 32733794 PMCID: PMC7358352 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Proton radiotherapy (PRT) is potentially associated with a lower risk for secondary malignancies due to a decreased integral dose to the surrounding organs at risk (OARs). Prospective trials confirming this are lacking due to the need for long-term follow-up and the ethical complexities of randomizing patients between modalities. The objective of the current study is to calculate the risk for secondary malignancies following PRT and photon-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Materials and Methods: Twenty-three patients (16 female and seven male), previously treated with active scanning PRT for malignant mediastinal lymphoma at Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, were retrospectively re-planned using helical photon IMRT. The risk for radiation-induced secondary malignancies was estimated and evaluated using two distinct prediction models (1–4). Results: According to the Dasu model, the median absolute total risk for tumor induction following IMRT was 4.4% (range, 3.3–5.8%), 9.9% (range, 2.0–27.6%), and 1.0% (range, 0.5–1.5%) for lung, breast, and esophageal cancer, respectively. For PRT, it was significantly lower for the aforementioned organs at 1.6% (range, 0.7–2.1%), 4.5% (range, 0.0–15.5), and 0.8% (range, 0.0–1.6%), respectively (p ≤ 0.01). The mortality risk from secondary malignancies was also significantly reduced for PRT relative to IMRT at 1.1 vs. 3.1% (p ≤ 0.001), 0.9 vs. 1.9% (p ≤ 0.001), and 0.7 vs. 1.0% (p ≤ 0.001) for lung, breast, and esophageal tumors, respectively. Using the Schneider model, a significant risk reduction of 54.4% (range, 32.2–84.0%), 56.4% (range, 16.0–99.4%), and 24.4% (range, 0.0–99.0%) was seen for secondary lung, breast, and esophageal malignancies, favoring PRT vs. X-ray-based IMRT (p ≤ 0.01). Conclusion: Based on the two prediction models, PRT for malignant mediastinal lymphoma is expected to reduce the risk for radiation-induced secondary malignancies compared with the X-ray-based IMRT. The young age and the long natural history of patients diagnosed with mediastinal lymphoma predisposes them to a high risk of secondary malignancies following curative radiotherapy treatment and, as a consequence, potentially reducing this risk by utilizing advanced radiation therapy techniques such as PRT should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Haering
- Department for Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clemens Lang
- Department for Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mona Splinter
- Department for Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bastian von Nettelbladt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonathan W Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department for Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department for Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
De Luca V, Gallio E, Bartoncini S, Giglioli FR, Sardo A, Cavallin C, Iorio GC, Orlandi E, Parise R, Palladino C, Buonavita A, Fiandra C, Levis M, Ricardi U. Adoption of Expansion Margins to Reduce the Dose Received by the Coronary Arteries and the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Lymphoma Patients. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020; 11:66-73. [PMID: 32565414 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Mediastinal radiation therapy (RT) in patients with lymphoma implies involuntary coronary artery (CA) exposure, resulting in an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Accurate delineation of CAs may spare them from higher RT doses. However, heart motion affects the estimation of the dose received by CAs. An expansion margin (planning organ at risk volume [PRV]), encompassing the nearby area where CAs displace, may compensate for these uncertainties, reducing CA dose and CAD risk. Our study aimed to evaluate if a planning process optimized on CA-specific PRVs, rather than just on CAs, could provide any dosimetric or clinical benefit. METHODS AND MATERIALS Forty patients receiving RT for mediastinal lymphomas were included. We contoured left main trunk, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries. An isotropic PRV was then applied to all CAs, in accordance with literature data. A comparison was then performed by optimizing treatment plans either on CAs or on PRVs, to detect any difference in CA sparing in terms of maximum (Dmax), median (Dmed), and mean (Dmean) dose. We then investigated, through risk modeling, if any dosimetric benefit obtained with the PRV-related optimization process could translate to a lower risk of ischemic complications. RESULTS Plan optimization on PRVs demonstrated a significant dose reduction (range, 7%-9%) in Dmax, Dmed, and Dmean for the whole coronary tree, and even higher dose reductions when vessels were located 5- to 20-mm from PTV (range, 13%-15%), especially for left main trunk and left circumflex (range, 16%-21%). This translated to a mean risk reduction of developing CAD of 12% (P < .01), which increased to 17% when CAs were located 5- to 20-mm from PTV. CONCLUSIONS Integration of CA-related PRVs in the optimization process reduces the dose received by CAs and translates to a meaningful prevention of CAD risk in patients with lymphoma treated with mediastinal RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viola De Luca
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Elena Gallio
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Romana Giglioli
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - Anna Sardo
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | | | | | - Erika Orlandi
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Ramona Parise
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Mario Levis
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Percussion assisted radiation therapy in Hodgkin lymphoma allows a marked reduction in heart dose. Radiother Oncol 2020; 152:163-168. [PMID: 32448409 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Revised: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable disease but the treatment can induce late complications many years later. Irradiation of the healthy heart is inevitable during radiation treatment of mediastinal sites. We developed a novel method to induce a prolonged apnea-like state that can help decrease the dose to organs at risk during radiation therapy. We present the results of the first 8 HL patients treated routinely with percussion assisted radiation therapy (PART) in our clinic. MATERIAL AND METHODS We used a newly developed high-frequency non-invasive ventilation system to suppress respiratory motion for prolonged periods and push the heart away from the treated volume. RESULTS All 8 patients were able to rapidly learn the technique and had an advantage to be treated by PART. We lowered the mean heart dose by an average of 3 Gy with similar target coverage compared to a classical free breathing treatment plan. They were all treated for 15 radiotherapy sessions by PART without any notable side effects. CONCLUSIONS Percussion assisted radiation therapy can be used routinely to reduce the dose to the heart in Hodgkin lymphoma.
Collapse
|
23
|
Lundgaard AY, Josipovic M, Rechner LA, Bidstrup PE, Hansen R, Damkjaer SS, Joergensen M, Safwat A, Specht L, Hjalgrim LL, Maraldo MV. The Feasibility of Implementing Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold for Pediatric Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:977-984. [PMID: 32005489 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Revised: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation therapy delivery during deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) reduces the irradiation of the heart and lungs and is therefore recommended for adults with mediastinal lymphoma. However, no studies have addressed the use of DIBH in children. This pilot study investigates the feasibility of and compliance with DIBH in children. METHODS AND MATERIALS Children from the age of 5 years were recruited to a training session to assess their ability to perform DIBH. No children received radiation therapy. The children were placed in a potential radiation therapy position. The DIBH was voluntary and monitored using an optical surface system providing visual feedback. Children who performed 3 stable DIBHs of 20 seconds each and remained motionless were deemed DIBH compliant. Compliance, equipment suitability, and coaching were further assessed in a semistructured interview. RESULTS We included 33 children (18 healthy and 15 hospitalized children with cancer) with a mean age of 8.5 years (range, 5-15). A total of 28 (85%) children were DIBH compliant. Twenty children were deemed immediately DIBH compliant, and 8 were deemed conditionally DIBH compliant, as DIBH compliance was presumed with custom-made immobilization and/or additional DIBH training. Mean age of the DIBH-compliant and the non-DIBH-compliant children was 8.9 years (range, 5-15) and 6 years (range, 5-9), respectively. Only 1 of 15 hospitalized children was not DIBH compliant and only 1 of all 33 children was unable to grasp the DIBH concept. The available DIBH equipment was suitable for children, and 94% reported that they were happy with training and performing DIBH. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study demonstrated that children from the age of 5 years can potentially comply with the DIBH technique and perform stable and reproducible DIBHs suitable for radiation therapy. Custom-made immobilization and adequate training will potentially increase DIBH compliance. A prospective clinical trial (NCT03315546), investigating the dosimetric benefit of radiation therapy delivery in DIBH compared with free breathing with pediatric patients, has been initiated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mirjana Josipovic
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Laura Ann Rechner
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pernille Envold Bidstrup
- Research Group on Psycological Aspects of Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen & Institute of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rune Hansen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | | | - Morten Joergensen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Akmal Safwat
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Lena Specht
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lisa Lyngsie Hjalgrim
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Andersson KM, Edvardsson A, Hall A, Enmark M, Kristensen I. Pencil beam scanning proton therapy of Hodgkin's lymphoma in deep inspiration breath-hold: A case series report. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2020; 13:6-10. [PMID: 32128456 PMCID: PMC7042155 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Revised: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
A combination of proton therapy and deep inspiration breath-hold can reduce normal tissue dose. The first patients treated showed clinically acceptable inter breath-hold variations. The treatment strategy is robust and works well at a proton center.
Background Most patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma are young and have a favourable prognosis, therefore it is of high importance to decrease the radiation doses to normal tissues received during radiotherapy. A combination of proton therapy and deep inspiration breath-hold technique (DIBH) can improve the sparing effect and thereby reduce the risk of late effects. Case presentation The two first patient cases treated with proton therapy in DIBH at the Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden, are presented here. Proton treatment plans were compared to photon plans based on doses to target and organs at risk. Several CT scans were acquired during the treatment course and inter breath-hold variations were evaluated based on anatomical distances and dosimetric comparisons. Conclusions The results from our first patients treated with proton therapy in DIBH imply that the treatment strategy is robust and has the potential to reduce dose to normal tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin M Andersson
- The Skandion Clinic, 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden.,School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, 70182 Örebro, Sweden
| | - Anneli Edvardsson
- The Skandion Clinic, 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden.,Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
| | | | - Marika Enmark
- The Skandion Clinic, 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden.,Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Kristensen
- The Skandion Clinic, 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden.,Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Intensity modulated proton therapy compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy in the irradiation of young female patients with hodgkin's lymphoma. Assessment of risk of toxicity and secondary cancer induction. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:12. [PMID: 31931861 PMCID: PMC6958567 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-1462-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate the role of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for advanced supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) in young female patients by assessing dosimetric features and modelling the risk of treatment related complications and radiation-induced secondary malignancies. Methods A group of 20 cases (planned according to the involved-site approach) were retrospectively investigated in a comparative planning study. Intensity modulated proton plans (IMPT) were compared to VMAT RapidArc plans (RA). Estimates of toxicity were derived from normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) calculations with either the Lyman or the Poisson models for a number of endpoints. Estimates of the risk of secondary cancer induction were determined for lungs, breasts, esophagus and thyroid. A simple model-based selection strategy was considered as a feasibility proof for the individualized selection of patients suitable for proton therapy. Results IMPT and VMAT plans resulted equivalent in terms of target dose distributions, both were capable to ensure high coverage and homogeneity. In terms of conformality, IMPT resulted ~ 10% better than RA plans. Concerning organs at risk, IMPT data presented a systematic improvement (highly significant) over RA for all organs, particularly in the dose range up to 20Gy. This lead to a composite average reduction of NTCP of 2.90 ± 2.24 and a reduction of 0.26 ± 0.22 in the relative risk of cardiac failures. The excess absolute risk per 10,000 patients-years of secondary cancer induction was reduced, with IMPT, of 9.1 ± 3.2, 7.2 ± 3.7 for breast and lung compared to RA. The gain in EAR for thyroid and esophagus was lower than 1. Depending on the arbitrary thresholds applied, the selection rate for proton treatment would have ranged from 5 to 75%. Conclusion In relation to young female patients with advanced supradiaphragmatic HL, IMPT can in general offer improved dose-volume sparing of organs at risk leading to an anticipated lower risk of early or late treatment related toxicities. This would reflect also in significantly lower risk of secondary malignancies induction compared to advanced photon based techniques. Depending on the selection thresholds and with all the limits of a non-validated and very basic model, it can be anticipated that a significant fraction of patients might be suitable for proton treatments if all the risk factors would be accounted for.
Collapse
|
26
|
Tseng YD, Maes SM, Kicska G, Sponsellor P, Traneus E, Wong T, Stewart RD, Saini J. Comparative photon and proton dosimetry for patients with mediastinal lymphoma in the era of Monte Carlo treatment planning and variable relative biological effectiveness. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:243. [PMID: 31888769 PMCID: PMC6937683 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1432-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Existing pencil beam analytical (PBA) algorithms for proton therapy treatment planning are not ideal for sites with heterogeneous tissue density and do not account for the spatial variations in proton relative biological effectiveness (vRBE). Using a commercially available Monte Carlo (MC) treatment planning system, we compared various dosimetric endpoints between proton PBA, proton MC, and photon treatment plans among patients with mediastinal lymphoma. Methods Eight mediastinal lymphoma patients with both free breathing (FB) and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) CT simulation scans were analyzed. The original PBA plans were re-calculated with MC. New proton plans that used MC for both optimization and dose calculation with equivalent CTV/ITV coverage were also created. A vRBE model, which uses a published model for DNA double strand break (DSB) induction, was applied on MC plans to study the potential impact of vRBE on cardiac doses. Comparative photon plans were generated on the DIBH scan. Results Re-calculation of FB PBA plans with MC demonstrated significant under coverage of the ITV V99 and V95. Target coverage was recovered by re-optimizing the PT plan with MC with minimal change to OAR doses. Compared to photons with DIBH, MC-optimized FB and DIBH proton plans had significantly lower dose to the mean lung, lung V5, breast tissue, and spinal cord for similar target coverage. Even with application of vRBE in the proton plans, the putative increase in RBE at the end of range did not decrease the dosimetric advantages of proton therapy in cardiac substructures. Conclusions MC should be used for PT treatment planning of mediastinal lymphoma to ensure adequate coverage of target volumes. Our preliminary data suggests that MC-optimized PT plans have better sparing of the lung and breast tissue compared to photons. Also, the potential for end of range RBE effects are unlikely to be large enough to offset the dosimetric advantages of proton therapy in cardiac substructures for mediastinal targets, although these dosimetric findings require validation with late toxicity data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda D Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356043, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. .,Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Shadonna M Maes
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Gregory Kicska
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Patricia Sponsellor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356043, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | | | - Tony Wong
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Robert D Stewart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356043, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Jatinder Saini
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Everett AS, Hoppe BS, Louis D, McDonald AM, Morris CG, Mendenhall NP, Li Z, Flampouri S. Comparison of Techniques for Involved-Site Radiation Therapy in Patients With Lower Mediastinal Lymphoma. Pract Radiat Oncol 2019; 9:426-434. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Revised: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
28
|
Abstract
Radiation therapy plays a critical role in the management of a wide range of hematologic malignancies. The optimal radiation dose and target volume, and safe and effective ways of integrating radiation with systemic agents, vary depending on the histologic subtypes, stage at presentation, patient performance status, response to systemic therapy if given, treatment intent, and patient preferences. Limiting doses to surrounding organs without sacrificing disease control is of paramount importance. Reducing radiation doses and treatment volume in selected cases, and the use of advanced radiotherapy technology, can improve the therapeutic ratio of patients receiving radiation therapy for hematologic malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda D Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1570 North 115th Street, Seattle, WA 98133, USA
| | - Andrea K Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ricardi U, Maraldo MV, Levis M, Parikh RR. Proton Therapy For Lymphomas: Current State Of The Art. Onco Targets Ther 2019; 12:8033-8046. [PMID: 31632057 PMCID: PMC6781741 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s220730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The combination of brief chemo-radiotherapy provides high cure rates and represents the first line of treatment for many lymphoma patients. As a result, a high proportion of long-term survivors may experience treatment-related toxic events many years later. Excess and unintended radiation dose to organs at risk (particularly heart, lungs and breasts) may translate in an increased risk of cardiovascular events and second cancers after a few decades. Minimizing dose to organs at risk is thus pivotal to restrain the risk of long-term complications. Proton therapy, with its peculiar physic properties, may help to better spare organs at risk and consequently to reduce toxicities especially in patients receiving mediastinal radiotherapy. Herein, we review the physical basis of proton therapy and the rationale for its implementation in lymphoma patients, with a detailed description of the clinical data. We also discuss the potential disadvantages and uncertainties of protons that may limit their application and critically review the dosimetric studies comparing the risk of late complications between proton and photon radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maja V Maraldo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mario Levis
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Rahul R Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abbassi LM, Goudjil F, Arsène-Henry A, Dendale R, Kirova YM. Protontherapy versus best photon for mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma: Dosimetry comparison and treatment using ILROG guidelines. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:922-925. [PMID: 31257097 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this work was reducing treatment-related toxicity for Hodgkin lymphomas using practical procedure inspired by the ILROG guidelines. Reporting the first case of localized Hodgkin lymphoma treated with protontherapy in France. A 24-year-old female with mediastinal, bulky, localized, mixed-cellularity, classic Hodgkin lymphoma required an involved-site radiation therapy after complete response following polychemotherapy. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy was not acceptable due to high doses to breasts, heart and lungs. We realized a four-dimensional computed tomography (CT) to evaluate target movements and another CT with gating and breath-hold technique. Delineation was performed on both CT using the initial fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/CT. One dosimetric plan with rotational intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a helical Tomotherapy© was realized and compared to another one with conformational protontherapy. Ninety-five percent of the planning target volume was covered by 98 and 99% of the prescribed dose with protontherapy and helical Tomotherapy©. Protontherapy provided the best organ at risk protection. Lung and heart protections were better with protontherapy: lung mean dose (3.7Gy vs. 8.4Gy) and median dose (0.002Gy vs. 6.9Gy), heart mean dose (2.6Gy vs. 3.7Gy). Breast sparing was better for both breasts using protontherapy: right breast mean dose (2.4Gy vs. 4.4Gy) and left (1.9Gy vs. 4.6Gy). The biggest difference was seen with low doses, which were better with protontherapy: volume of lung receiving 5Gy was 17.5% vs. 54.2% with Helical Tomotherapy©. In view of these results, we decided to treat our patient with protontherapy using respiratory assessment. We delivered 30Gy (15 fractions) using protontherapy with one direct anterior field using pencil beam scanning and deep inspiration breath-hold technique. We observed only grade 1 skin erythema during treatment and no toxicity during early follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Abbassi
- Department of radiation oncology, institut Curie Paris-Orsay, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.
| | - F Goudjil
- Department of radiation oncology, institut Curie Paris-Orsay, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - A Arsène-Henry
- Department of radiation oncology, institut Curie Paris-Orsay, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - R Dendale
- Department of radiation oncology, institut Curie Paris-Orsay, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Y M Kirova
- Department of radiation oncology, institut Curie Paris-Orsay, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ntentas G, Dedeckova K, Andrlik M, Aznar MC, George B, Kubeš J, Darby SC, Cutter DJ. Clinical Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most? Pract Radiat Oncol 2019; 9:179-187. [PMID: 30708133 PMCID: PMC6493042 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Revised: 01/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation therapy (RT) improves control of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), but patients who undergo RT are at risk for late effects, including cardiovascular disease and second cancers, because of radiation doses to organs at risk (OARs). Proton therapy (PT) can reduce OAR doses compared with conventional photon RT. However, access to PT is currently limited, so referrals must be appropriately selective. We aimed to identify subgroups of patients with HL who could benefit the most dosimetrically from RT with PT based on the prechemotherapy disease characteristics. METHODS AND MATERIALS Normal tissue radiation doses were calculated for 21 patients with HL who were treated with deep-inspiration breath-hold pencil-beam scanning (PBS) PT and compared with doses from 3-dimensional conformal (3D-CRT) and partial arc volumetric modulated (PartArc) photon RT. Prechemotherapy disease characteristics associated with significant dosimetric benefits from PBS compared with photon RT were identified. RESULTS Treatment with PBS was well tolerated and provided with good local control. PBS provided dosimetric advantages for patients whose clinical treatment volume extended below the seventh thoracic level and for female patients with axillary disease. In addition, an increasing dosimetric benefit for some OARs was observed for increasing target volume. PBS significantly reduced the mean dose to the heart, breast, lungs, spinal cord, and esophagus. Dose homogeneity and conformity within the target volume were also superior with PBS, but some high-dose measures and hot spots were increased with PBS compared with partial arc volumetric modulated photon RT. CONCLUSIONS PBS gives good target coverage and local control while providing reductions in radiation dose to OARs for individuals who receive RT for HL compared with advanced photon RT. Our findings highlight groups of patients who would be expected to gain more dosimetric benefit from PBS. These findings facilitate the selection of patients who should be considered a priority for PT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Ntentas
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Michal Andrlik
- Proton Therapy Center Czech s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marianne C Aznar
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ben George
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jiří Kubeš
- Proton Therapy Center Czech s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Sarah C Darby
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David J Cutter
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Cancer Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Edvardsson A, Kügele M, Alkner S, Enmark M, Nilsson J, Kristensen I, Kjellén E, Engelholm S, Ceberg S. Comparative treatment planning study for mediastinal Hodgkin's lymphoma: impact on normal tissue dose using deep inspiration breath hold proton and photon therapy. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:95-104. [PMID: 30280626 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1512153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Late effects induced by radiotherapy (RT) are of great concern for mediastinal Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients and it is therefore important to reduce normal tissue dose. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact on the normal tissue dose and target coverage, using various combinations of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 3-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT), planned in both deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and free breathing (FB). MATERIAL AND METHODS Eighteen patients were enrolled in this study and planned with involved site RT. Two computed tomography images were acquired for each patient, one during DIBH and one during FB. Six treatment plans were created for each patient; 3D-CRT in FB, 3D-CRT in DIBH, VMAT in FB, VMAT in DIBH, IMPT in FB and IMPT in DIBH. Dosimetric impact on the heart, left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery, lungs, female breasts, target coverage, and also conformity index and integral dose (ID), was compared between the different treatment techniques. RESULTS The use of DIBH significantly reduced the lung dose for all three treatment techniques, however, no significant difference in the dose to the female breasts was observed. Regarding the heart and LAD doses, large individual variations were observed. For VMAT, the mean heart and LAD doses were significantly reduced using DIBH, but no significant difference was observed for 3D-CRT and IMPT. Both IMPT and VMAT resulted in improved target coverage and more conform dose distributions compared to 3D-CRT. IMPT generally showed the lowest organs at risk (OAR) doses and significantly reduced the ID compared to both 3D-CRT and VMAT. CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients benefited from treatment in DIBH, however, the impact on the normal tissue dose was highly individual and therefore comparative treatment planning is encouraged. The lowest OAR doses were generally observed for IMPT in combination with DIBH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneli Edvardsson
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Malin Kügele
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sara Alkner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Marika Enmark
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Joakim Nilsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Kristensen
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Kjellén
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Silke Engelholm
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sofie Ceberg
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Clemente S, Oliviero C, Palma G, D'Avino V, Liuzzi R, Conson M, Pacelli R, Cella L. Auto- versus human-driven plan in mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma radiation treatment. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:202. [PMID: 30340604 PMCID: PMC6194601 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1146-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Technological advances in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) radiation therapy (RT) by high conformal treatments potentially increase control over organs-at-risk (OARs) dose distribution. However, plan optimization remains a time-consuming task with great operator dependent variability. Purpose of the present study was to devise a fully automated pipeline based on the Pinnacle3 Auto-Planning (AP) algorithm for treating female supradiaphragmatic HL (SHL) patients. Methods CT-scans of 10 female patients with SHL were considered. A “butterfly” (BF) volumetric modulated arc therapy was optimized using SmartArc module integrated in Pinnacle3 v. 9.10 using Collapsed Cone Convolution Superposition algorithm (30 Gy in 20 fractions). Human-driven (Manual-BF) and AP-BF optimization plans were generated. For AP, an optimization objective list of Planning Target Volume (PTV)/OAR clinical goals was first implemented, starting from a subset of 5 patients used for algorithm training. This list was then tested on the remaining 5 patients (validation set). In addition to the BF technique, the AP engine was applied to a 2 coplanar disjointed arc (AP-ARC) technique using the same objective list. For plan evaluation, dose-volume-histograms of PTVs and OARs were extracted; homogeneity and conformity indices (HI and CI), OARs dose-volume metrics and odds for different toxicity endpoints were computed. Non-parametric Friedman and Dunn tests were used to identify significant differences between groups. Results A single AP objective list for SHL was obtained. Compared to the manual plan, both AP-plans offer comparable CIs while AP-ARC also achieved comparable HIs. All plans fulfilled the clinical dose criteria set for OARs: both AP solutions performed at least as good as Manual-BF plan. In particular, AP-ARC outperformed AP-BF in terms of heart sparing involving a lower risk of coronary events and radiation-induced lung fibrosis. Hands-on planning time decreased by a factor of 10 using AP on average. Conclusions Despite the high interpatient PTV (size and position) variability, it was possible to set a standard SHL AP optimization list with a high level of generalizability. Using the implemented list, the AP module was able to limit OAR doses, producing clinically acceptable plans with stable quality without additional user input. Overall, the AP engine associated to the arc technique represents the best option for SHL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Giuseppe Palma
- National Research Council, Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, Naples, Italy
| | - Vittoria D'Avino
- National Research Council, Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaele Liuzzi
- National Research Council, Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, Naples, Italy
| | - Manuel Conson
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University School of Medicine, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Pacelli
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University School of Medicine, Naples, Italy
| | - Laura Cella
- National Research Council, Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Aviles A, Nambo MJ, Neri N, Calva A. Risk of a second neoplasm on long-term survivors of Hodgkin's lymphoma. PRECISION RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/pro6.52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Agustin Aviles
- Oncology Research Unit; Oncology Hospital; National Medical Center; Mexican Institute of Social Security(IMSS); Mexico City Mexico
| | - Maria-Jesus Nambo
- Department of Hematology; Oncology Hospital; National Medical Center; Mexican Institute of Social Security(IMSS); Mexico City Mexico
| | - Natividad Neri
- Department of Hematology; Oncology Hospital; National Medical Center; Mexican Institute of Social Security(IMSS); Mexico City Mexico
| | - Angel Calva
- Department of Radiotherapy; Oncology Hospital; National Medical Center; Mexican Institute of Social Security(IMSS); Mexico City Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Baues C, Marnitz S, Engert A, Baus W, Jablonska K, Fogliata A, Vásquez-Torres A, Scorsetti M, Cozzi L. Proton versus photon deep inspiration breath hold technique in patients with hodgkin lymphoma and mediastinal radiation : A PLANNING COMPARISON OF DEEP INSPIRATION BREATH HOLD INTENSITY MODULATION RADIOTHERAPY AND INTENSITY MODULATED PROTON THERAPY. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:122. [PMID: 29970105 PMCID: PMC6029162 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1066-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 06/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of proton therapy in the treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are controversially discussed. Therefore we compared intensitiy modulated proton therapy (IMPT) with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), in the form of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), through a comparative treatment planning study. METHODS Radiation plans for 21 patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) were computed for IMPT and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) VMAT. Plans were optimized and computed assuming deep inspiration breath holding conditions. Dosimetric comparison on standard metrics from dose volume histograms was performed to appraise the relative merits of the two techniques, while proton plan robustness was assessed by re-computing the dose distribution of each plan by varying the Hounsfield Units to stopping power calibration by applying a ± 3 and 4% error. RESULTS DIBH-VMAT and IMPT both provided excellent coverage, conformity and heterogeneity of the clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV). IMPT reduced mean doses to the breasts, lungs, heart and normal tissue by 38-83%. IMPT significantly reduced mean doses to the heart to < 5 Gy despite bulky mediastinal disease and decreased breast doses in female patients to < 1 Gy. Despite the simulated 3 and 4% miscalibration errors, no remarkable or measurable impact was observed on the organs at risk (OARs). CONCLUSIONS This is the first comparison between DIBH-VMAT and IMPT in HL treatment. We could demonstrate statistically significant decreases in all dose/volume metrics of the OARs. Regardless of the planning paradigm used, range uncertainties can substantially under dose the PTV, while perhaps not leading to clinically significant deterioration of CTV coverage. With the geometry applied no impact was observed for OARs, suggesting IMPT as a superior technique for potentially reducing future health risks for HL patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Baues
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center and Radiation Reference Center of the GHSG, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 52, 50937 Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center and Radiation Reference Center of the GHSG, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 52, 50937 Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- Medical Faculty, Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Baus
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center and Radiation Reference Center of the GHSG, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 52, 50937 Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karolina Jablonska
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center and Radiation Reference Center of the GHSG, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 52, 50937 Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | - Antonella Fogliata
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrés Vásquez-Torres
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center and Radiation Reference Center of the GHSG, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 52, 50937 Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Cozzi
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Grau C, Baumann M, Weber DC. Optimizing clinical research and generating prospective high-quality data in particle therapy in Europe: Introducing the European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN). Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:1-3. [PMID: 30049367 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Revised: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cai Grau
- The Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Levis M, De Luca V, Fiandra C, Veglia S, Fava A, Gatti M, Giorgi M, Bartoncini S, Cadoni F, Garabello D, Ragona R, Filippi AR, Ricardi U. Plan optimization for mediastinal radiotherapy: Estimation of coronary arteries motion with ECG-gated cardiac imaging and creation of compensatory expansion margins. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127:481-486. [PMID: 29729845 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Revised: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|