Dose-volume histogram analysis of brainstem necrosis in head and neck tumors treated using carbon-ion radiotherapy

Proton or Carbon Ion Therapy for Skull Base Chordoma: Rationale and First Analysis of a Mono-Institutional Experience

Background: Skull base chordomas are radio-resistant tumors that require high-dose, high-precision radiotherapy, as can be delivered by particle therapy (protons and carbon ions). We performed a first clinical outcome analysis of particle therapy based on the initial 4-years of operation. Methods: Between August 2017 and October 2021, 44 patients were treated with proton (89%) or carbon ion therapy (11%). Prior gross total resection had been performed in 21% of lesions, subtotal resection in 57%, biopsy in 12% and decompression in 10%. The average prescription dose was 75.2 Gy RBE in 37 fractions for protons and 66 Gy RBE in 22 fractions for carbon ions. Results: At a median follow-up of 34.3 months (range: 1–55), 2-, and 3-year actuarial local control rates were 95.5% and 90.9%, respectively. The 2-, and 3-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 97.7%, 93.2%, 95.5% and 90.9%, respectively. The tumor volume at the time of particle therapy was highly predictive of local failure (p < 0.01), and currently, there is 100% local control in patients with tumors < 49 cc. No grade ≥3 toxicities were observed. There was no significant difference in outcome or side effect profile seen for proton versus carbon ion therapy. Five patients (11.4%) experienced transient grade ≤2 radiation-induced brain changes. Conclusions: The first analysis suggests the safety and efficacy of proton and carbon ion therapy at our center. The excellent control of small to mid-size chordomas underlines the effectiveness of particle therapy and importance of upfront maximum debulking of large lesions.

Dose-volume constraints for head-and-neck cancer in carbon ion radiotherapy: A literature review

BACKGROUND

Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has been applied in cancer treatment for over 25 years. However, guidelines for dose-volume constraints have not been established yet. The aim of this review is to summarize the dose-volume constraints in CIRT for head-and-neck (HN) cancer that were determined through previous clinical studies based on the Japanese models for relative biological effectiveness (RBE).

METHODS

A literature review was conducted to identify all constraints determined for HN cancer CIRT that are based on the Japanese RBE models.

RESULTS

Dose-volume constraints are reported for 17 organs at risk (OARs), including the brainstem, ocular structures, masticatory muscles, and skin. Various treatment planning strategies are also presented for reducing the dose delivered to OARs.

CONCLUSIONS

The reported constraints will provide assistance during treatment planning to ensure that radiation to OARs is minimized, and thus adverse effects are reduced. Although the constraints are given based on the Japanese RBE models, applying the necessary conversion factors will potentially enable their application by institutions worldwide that use the local effect model for RBE.

Organs at risk dose constraints in carbon ion radiotherapy at MedAustron: Translations between LEM and MKM RBE models and preliminary clinical results

BACKGROUND

Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) treatment planning is based on relative biological effectiveness (RBE) weighted dose calculations. A large amount of clinical evidence for CIRT was collected in Japan with RBE estimated by the modified microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) while all European centres apply the first version of the local effect model (LEM). Japanese schedules have been used in Europe with adapted prescription dose and organs at risk (OAR) dose constraints. Recently, less conservative adapted LEM constraints have been implemented in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to analyse the new set of LEM dose constraints for brain parenchyma, brainstem and optic system considering both RBE models and evaluating early clinical data.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

31 patients receiving CIRT at MedAustron were analysed using the RayStation v9A planning system by recalculating clinical LEM-based plans in MKM. Dose statistics (D1cm³, D5cm³, D0.1cm³, D0.7cm³, D10%, D20%) were extracted for relevant critical OARs. Curve fitting for those values was performed, resulting in linear quadratic translation models. Clinical and radiological toxicity was evaluated.

RESULTS

Based on derived fits, currently applied LEM constraints matched recommended MKM constraints with deviations between -8% and +3.9%. For particular cases, data did not follow the expected LEM vs MKM trends resulting in outliers. Radiological (asymptomatic) toxicity was detected in two outlier cases.

CONCLUSION

Respecting LEM constraints does not automatically ensure that MKM constraints are met. Constraints for both RBE models need to be fulfilled for future CIRT patients at MedAustron. Careful selection of planning strategies is essential.

An ion-independent phenomenological relative biological effectiveness (RBE) model for proton therapy

BACKGROUND

A relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is used for proton therapy though clinical evidence of varying RBE was raised. Clinical studies on RBE variability have been conducted for decades for carbon radiation, which could advance the understanding of the clinical proton RBE given an ion-independent RBE model. In this work, such a model, linear and simple, using the beam quantity Q = Z²/E (Z = ion charge, E = kinetic energy per nucleon) was tested and compared to the commonly used, proton-specific and linear energy transfer (LET) based Wedenberg RBE model.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The Wedenberg and Q models, both predicting RBE_max and RBE_min (i.e., RBE at vanishing and very high dose, respectively), are compared in terms of ion-dependence and prediction power. An experimental in-vitro data ensemble covering 115 publications for various ions was used as dataset.

RESULTS

The model parameter of the Q model was observed to be similar for different ions (in contrast to LET). The Q model was trained without any prior knowledge of proton data. For proton RBE, the differences between experimental data and corresponding predictions of the Wedenberg or the Q model were highly comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple linear RBE model using Q instead of LET was proposed and tested to be able to predict proton RBE using model parameter trained based on only RBE data of other particles in a clinical proton energy range for a large in-vitro dataset. Adding (pre)clinical knowledge from carbon ion therapy may, therefore, reduce the dominating biological uncertainty in proton RBE modelling. This would translate in reduced RBE related uncertainty in proton therapy treatment planning.

Dosimetric Parameters Predicting Tooth Loss after Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Tumors

Background: Tooth loss reduces quality of life; however, little is known about tooth loss caused by carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). Here, we aimed to elucidate the incidence of tooth loss post-CIRT for head and neck tumors and to identify risk-predictive dosimetric parameters. Methods: This study enrolled 14 patients (i.e., 171 teeth in total) with head and neck non-squamous cell carcinoma. All patients received CIRT comprised of 57.6 or 64.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness, RBE) in 16 fractions. Dose–volume analysis of the teeth was performed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with VX (i.e., the volume irradiated with X Gy (RBE)). Results: The median follow-up period was 69.1 months. The median time of tooth loss was 38.6 months. The 5 year cumulative incidence of tooth loss was 13.3%. The volume of irradiated teeth was significantly greater for the lost teeth than for the remaining teeth throughout the dose range. Using the cut-offs calculated from ROC curve analysis, V30–V60 showed high accuracy (i.e., >94%) for predicting tooth loss, with V50 being the most accurate (cut-off, 58.1%; accuracy, 0.95). Conclusions: This is the first report to examine the incidence of tooth loss post-CIRT and to identify risk-predictive dosimetric parameters.

Carbon Ion Dose Constraints in the Head and Neck and Skull Base: Review of MedAustron Institutional Protocols

Background

Dose constraints are of paramount importance for the outcome of any radiotherapy treatment. In this article, we report dose-volume constraints as well as currently used fractionation schedules for carbon ion radiotherapy as applied in MedAustron (Wiener Neustadt, Austria).

Materials and Methods

For fractionation schedules, both German and Japanese regimes were used. From the clinical experience of National Institute of Radiological Sciences (Chiba, Japan) and Heidelberg Ion Therapy (Heidelberg, Germany; formerly GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany) and the work by colleagues in Centro Nazionale Adroterapia Oncologica (Pavia, Italy) recalculating the dose from the microdosimetric kinetic model to the local effect model, we have set the dose constraints for critical organs of the head and neck area. Where no clinical data was available, an educated guess was made, based on data available from photon and proton series.

Results

We report the constraints for the optic nerve and chiasm, brainstem, spinal cord, cochlea, brain parenchyma, salivary gland, eye and adnexa, and mandibular/maxillary bone; constraints are grouped based on a fractionation scheme (German versus Japanese) and the risk of toxicity (safe, low to middle, and middle to high).

Conclusion

We think validation of dose constraints should present a relevant part of the activity of any carbon ion radiotherapy facility, and we anticipate future multicentric, joint evaluations.

Brainstem NTCP and Dose Constraints for Carbon Ion RT-Application and Translation From Japanese to European RBE-Weighted Dose

Background and Purpose

The Italian National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO) has applied dose constraints for carbon ion RT (CIRT) as defined by Japan’s National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS). However, these institutions use different models to predict the relative biological effectiveness (RBE). CNAO applies the Local Effect Model I (LEM I), which in most clinical situations predicts higher RBE than NIRS’s Microdosimetric Kinetic Model (MKM). Equal constraints therefore become more restrictive at CNAO. Tolerance doses for the brainstem have not been validated for LEM I-weighted dose (D_{LEM I}). However, brainstem constraints and a Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) model were recently reported for MKM-weighted dose (D_MKM), showing that a constraint relaxation to D_{MKM|0.7 cm³} <30 Gy (RBE) and D_{MKM|0.1 cm³} <40 Gy (RBE) was feasible. The aim of this work was to evaluate the brainstem NTCP associated with CNAO’s current clinical practice and to propose new brainstem constraints for LEM I-optimized CIRT at CNAO.

Material and Methods

We reproduced the absorbed dose of 30 representative patient treatment plans from CNAO. Subsequently, we calculated both D_{LEM I} and D_MKM, and the relationship between D_MKM and D_{LEM I} for various brainstem dose metrics was analyzed. Furthermore, the NTCP model developed for D_MKM was applied to estimate the NTCPs of the delivered plans.

Results

The translation of CNAO treatment plans to D_MKM confirmed that the former CNAO constraints were conservative compared with D_MKM constraints. Estimated NTCPs were 0% for all but one case, in which the NTCP was 2%. The relationship D_MKM/D_{LEM I} could be described by a quadratic regression model which revealed that the validated D_MKM constraints corresponded to D_{LEM I|0.7 cm³} <41 Gy (RBE) (95% CI, 38–44 Gy (RBE)) and D_{LEM I|0.1 cm³} <49 Gy (RBE) (95% CI, 46–52 Gy (RBE)).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that RBE-weighted dose translation is of crucial importance in order to exchange experience and thus harmonize CIRT treatments globally. To mitigate uncertainties involved, we propose to use the lower bound of the 95% CI of the translation estimates, i.e., D_{LEM I|0.7 cm³} <38 Gy (RBE) and D_{LEM I|0.1 cm³} <46 Gy (RBE) as brainstem dose constraints for 16 fraction CIRT treatments optimized with LEM I.

Research progress on mechanism and dosimetry of brainstem injury induced by intensity-modulated radiotherapy, proton therapy, and heavy ion radiotherapy

Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective method for treating head and neck cancer (HNC). However, RT may cause side effects during and after treatment. Radiation-induced brainstem injury (BSI) is often neglected due to its low incidence and short survival time and because it is indistinguishable from intracranial tumor progression. It is currently believed that the possible mechanism of radiation-induced BSI includes increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and damage of vascular endothelial cells, neurons, and glial cells as well as an inflammatory response and oxidative stress. At present, it is still difficult to avoid BSI even with several advanced RT techniques. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the most commonly used therapeutic technique in the field of RT. Compared with early conformal therapy, it has greatly reduced the injury to normal tissues. Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) and heavy ion radiotherapy (HIT) have good dose distribution due to the presence of a Bragg peak, which not only results in better control of the tumor but also minimizes the dose to the surrounding normal tissues. There are many clinical studies on BSI caused by IMRT, PBT, and HIT. In this paper, we review the mechanism, dosimetry, and other aspects of BSI caused by IMRT, PBT, and HIT.Key Points• Enhanced MRI imaging can better detect radiation-induced BSI early.• This article summarized the dose constraints of brainstem toxicity in clinical studies using different techniques including IMRT, PBT, and HIT and recommended better dose constraints pattern to clinicians.• The latest pathological mechanism of radiation-induced BSI and the corresponding advanced treatment methods will be discussed.

Proton Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: First Dosimetric Comparison for Total Scalp Irradiation

Purpose:

Total scalp irradiation (TSI) is used to treat malignancies of the scalp and face, including angiosarcomas, nonmelanoma skin cancers, and cutaneous lymphomas. Owing to the irregularity of the scalp contour and the presence of underlying critical organs at risk (OARs), radiation planning is challenging and technically difficult. To address these complexities, several different radiation therapy techniques have been used. These include the combined lateral photon-electron technique (3DRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)/volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), helical tomotherapy (HT), and mold-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR BT). However, the use of proton radiation therapy (PRT) has never been documented.

Materials and Methods:

A 71-year-old, immunosuppressed man presented with recurrent nonmelanoma skin cancer of the scalp. He was successfully treated at our center with PRT to deliver TSI. A comparative VMAT treatment plan was generated and dose to critical OARs was compared.

Results:

We present the first clinical case report of PRT for TSI and dosimetric comparison to a VMAT plan. The PRT and VMAT plans provided equivalent target volume coverage; however, the PRT plan significantly reduced dose to the brain, hippocampi, and optical apparatus.

Conclusion:

TSI planned with PRT is relatively straightforward from a planning perspective and does not require a bolus. It also has the potential to decrease radiation therapy–related toxicity. However, PRT is relatively expensive and not universally available. The uncertainty surrounding the end-range of the proton beam is a consideration. Although there are potential disadvantages to using PRT for TSI, its use should be considered by treating radiation oncologists and referring physicians.

Carbon-ion radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for head and neck mucosal melanoma: Prospective observational study

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of carbon‐ion radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy using dacarbazine, nimustine, and vincristine (DAV therapy) in mucosal melanoma. Twenty‐one patients with clinically localized mucosal melanoma of the head and neck were enrolled. The primary endpoint was 3‐year overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included local control, progression‐free survival (PFS), and adverse event occurrence. Carbon‐ion radiotherapy with a dose of 57.6‐64.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 16 fractions was delivered concurrently with DAV therapy, and 2 cycles of adjuvant DAV therapy were administered every 6 weeks. The median follow‐up periods were 15.5 months for all patients, and 31.2 months for 12 surviving patients. All patients had locally advanced T4a or T4b disease in the rhino‐sinus area. In 16 patients (76.2%), 3 cycles of planned DAV therapy were completed. The 3‐year OS and PFS rates were 49.2% and 37.0% respectively. The 3‐year local control rate was 92.3%. Eleven patients (52%) developed distant metastasis, which was the most frequent pattern of the first failure. Commonly presenting acute grade 2‐3 toxicities associated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy were mucositis (11 patients [53%]) and leukopenia (9 patients [43%]), which improved with conservative therapy. None of the patients developed grade 3 or greater late toxicities. Carbon‐ion radiotherapy in combination with DAV therapy led to excellent local control for advanced mucosal melanoma within acceptable toxicities. The efficacy of additional DAV therapy in improving survival was weaker than expected as distant metastases still occurred frequently. Trial registration no. UMIN000007939.

Dosimetric parameters predictive of nasolacrimal duct obstruction after carbon-ion radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Little information is available on the risk factors for nasolacrimal duct obstruction after radiotherapy for head and neck tumors. We investigated the incidence and predictive dosimetric parameters for nasolacrimal duct obstruction following carbon-ion radiotherapy for head and neck tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with head and neck non-squamous cell carcinoma were analyzed in this single-institution prospective study. More than half of the tumors were located in the nasal cavity and maxillary sinus. Carbon-ion radiotherapy consisting of 57.6 or 64.0 Gy(relative biological effectiveness; RBE) in 16 fractions was administered. Nasolacrimal duct obstruction was recorded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Cutoff values were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. VX indicates the volume irradiated with X Gy(RBE).

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 60.3 months. Incidences of Grade 1 and 2 nasolacrimal duct obstructions were 46% (13/28) and 7% (2/28), respectively; no Grade 3 or greater toxicities were recorded. Throughout the dose range, the volumes of the irradiated nasolacrimal ducts were significantly higher in the obstruction-positive patients than in the obstruction-negative patients (p < 0.001 for V10, V20, V30, V40, V50, and V60). Cutoff values determined by the ROC curve analysis classified the obstruction-positive patients with an accuracy of >96% over the entire range of V10-V60.

CONCLUSION

The incidence and predictive dosimetric parameters for nasolacrimal duct obstruction after carbon-ion radiotherapy were demonstrated in a prospective cohort. These data should help optimize carbon-ion radiotherapy treatments for patients with head and neck tumors.

Optic nerve constraints for carbon ion RT at CNAO - Reporting and relating outcome to European and Japanese RBE

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Until now, carbon ion RT (CIRT) dose constraints for the optic nerve (ON) have only been validated and reported in the NIRS RBE-weighted dose (D_NIRS). The aim of this work is to improve CNAO's RBE-weighted dose (D_LEM) constraints by analyzing institutional toxicity data and by relating it to D_NIRS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 65 ONs from 38 patients treated with CIRT to the head and neck region in the period 2013-14 were analyzed. The absorbed dose (D_Abs) of the treatment plans was reproduced and subsequently both D_LEM and D_NIRS were applied, thus relating CNAO clinical toxicity to D_NIRS.

RESULTS

Median FU was 47 (26-67) months. Visual acuity was preserved for the 56 ONs in which the old constraints were respected. Three ONs developed visual decline at D_LEM|1% ≥71 Gy(RBE)/D_LEM|20% ≥68 Gy(RBE), corresponding to D_NIRS|1% ≥68 Gy(RBE)/D_NIRS|20% ≥62 Gy(RBE). Dose recalculation revealed that NIRS constraints of D_NIRS|1% ≤40 Gy(RBE)/D_NIRS|20% ≤28 Gy(RBE) corresponded to D_LEM|1% ≤50 Gy(RBE)/D_LEM|20% ≤40 Gy(RBE). Reoptimization of treatment plans with these new D_LEM constraints showed that the dose distribution still complied with NIRS constraints when evaluated in D_NIRS. However, due to uncertainties in the method, and to comply with the EQD2-based constraints used at GSI/HIT, a more moderate constraint relaxation to D_LEM|1% ≤45 Gy(RBE)/D_LEM|20% ≤37 Gy(RBE) has been implemented in CNAO clinical routine since October 2018.

CONCLUSION

New D_LEM constraints for the ON were derived by analyzing CNAO toxicity data and by linking our results to the experience of NIRS and GSI/HIT. This work demonstrates the value of recalculating and reporting results in both D_LEM and D_NIRS.

A multi-institutional retrospective study of carbon-ion radiotherapy for non-squamous cell malignant tumors of the nasopharynx: Subanalysis of Japan Carbon-Ion Radiation Oncology Study Group study 1402 HN

Background

This multi‐institutional retrospective study focused on the clinical outcome of carbon‐ion radiotherapy (C‐ion RT) for non‐squamous cell malignant tumors of the nasopharynx.

Methods

The Japan Carbon‐ion Radiation Oncology Study Group collected and analyzed data for 43 patients with non‐squamous cell malignant tumors of the nasopharynx treated with C‐ion RT at four institutions in Japan.

Results

Twenty‐nine patients had adenoid cystic carcinomas, seven had malignant melanomas, three had adenocarcinomas, two had mucoepidermoid carcinomas, and two had other pathologies. Twenty‐six of the 43 patients (61%) had T4 tumors. The most common dose‐fractionation schedule was 64 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 16 fractions. The median follow‐up period was 30 months. The 2‐year local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) rates were 88% and 84%, respectively. For late toxicity, one patient developed grade 4 optic nerve disorder and two developed grade 5 pharyngeal hemorrhage. Actual incidence of grade 3 or higher late adverse events was 19%, and included cranial nerve dysfunction, jaw bone necrosis, central nervous system necrosis, and ear inflammation.

Conclusions

C‐ion RT provided good LC and OS rates with acceptable toxicity for treatment of non‐squamous cell malignant tumors of the nasopharynx.