Patterns of re-irradiation for recurrent gliomas and validation of a prognostic score

Brain Re-Irradiation Or Chemotherapy: a phase II randomised trial of re-irradiation and chemotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BRIOChe) - protocol for a multi-centre open-label randomised trial

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common adult primary malignant brain tumour. The condition is incurable and, despite aggressive treatment at first presentation, almost all tumours recur after a median of 7 months. The aim of treatment at recurrence is to prolong survival and maintain health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Chemotherapy is typically employed for recurrent GBM, often using nitrosourea-based regimens. However, efficacy is limited, with reported median survivals between 5 and 9 months from recurrence. Although less commonly used in the UK, there is growing evidence that re-irradiation may produce survival outcomes at least similar to nitrosourea-based chemotherapy. However, there remains uncertainty as to the optimum approach and there is a paucity of available data, especially with regards to HRQoL. Brain Re-Irradiation Or Chemotherapy (BRIOChe) aims to assess re-irradiation, as an acceptable treatment option for recurrent IDH-wild-type GBM.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

BRIOChe is a phase II, multi-centre, open-label, randomised trial in patients with recurrent GBM. The trial uses Sargent's three-outcome design and will recruit approximately 55 participants from 10 to 15 UK radiotherapy sites, allocated (2:1) to receive re-irradiation (35 Gy in 10 daily fractions) or nitrosourea-based chemotherapy (up to six, 6-weekly cycles). The primary endpoint is overall survival rate for re-irradiation patients at 9 months. There will be no formal statistical comparison between treatment arms for the decision-making primary analysis. The chemotherapy arm will be used for calibration purposes, to collect concurrent data to aid interpretation of results. Secondary outcomes include HRQoL, dexamethasone requirement, anti-epileptic drug requirement, radiological response, treatment compliance, acute and late toxicities, progression-free survival.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

BRIOChe obtained ethical approval from Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (reference no. 20/NI/0070). Final trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and adhere to the ICMJE guidelines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN60524.

Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future

Glioblastoma (GB) stands out as the most prevalent and lethal form of brain cancer. Although great efforts have been made by clinicians and researchers, no significant improvement in survival has been achieved since the Stupp protocol became the standard of care (SOC) in 2005. Despite multimodality treatments, recurrence is almost universal with survival rates under 2 years after diagnosis. Here, we discuss the recent progress in our understanding of GB pathophysiology, in particular, the importance of glioma stem cells (GSCs), the tumor microenvironment conditions, and epigenetic mechanisms involved in GB growth, aggressiveness and recurrence. The discussion on therapeutic strategies first covers the SOC treatment and targeted therapies that have been shown to interfere with different signaling pathways (pRB/CDK4/RB1/P16ink4, TP53/MDM2/P14arf, PI3k/Akt-PTEN, RAS/RAF/MEK, PARP) involved in GB tumorigenesis, pathophysiology, and treatment resistance acquisition. Below, we analyze several immunotherapeutic approaches (i.e., checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, CAR-modified NK or T cells, oncolytic virotherapy) that have been used in an attempt to enhance the immune response against GB, and thereby avoid recidivism or increase survival of GB patients. Finally, we present treatment attempts made using nanotherapies (nanometric structures having active anti-GB agents such as antibodies, chemotherapeutic/anti-angiogenic drugs or sensitizers, radionuclides, and molecules that target GB cellular receptors or open the blood-brain barrier) and non-ionizing energies (laser interstitial thermal therapy, high/low intensity focused ultrasounds, photodynamic/sonodynamic therapies and electroporation). The aim of this review is to discuss the advances and limitations of the current therapies and to present novel approaches that are under development or following clinical trials.

Re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma: an analysis of prognostic factors for survival and predictors of radiation necrosis

PURPOSE

Recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG) is a heterogeneous population, and the ideal patient selection for re-irradiation (re-RT) has yet to be established. This study aims to identify prognostic factors for rHGG patients treated with re-RT.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive adults with rHGG who underwent re-RT from 2009 to 2020 from our institutional database. The primary objective was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included prognostic factors for early death (< 6 months after re-RT) and predictors of radiation necrosis (RN).

RESULTS

For the 79 patients identified, the median OS after re-RT was 9.9 months (95% CI 8.3-11.6). On multivariate analyses, re-resection at progression (HR 0.56, p = 0.027), interval from primary treatment to first progression ≥ 16.3 months (HR 0.61, p = 0.034), interval from primary treatment to re-RT ≥ 23.9 months (HR 0.35, p < 0.001), and re-RT PTV volume < 112 cc (HR 0.27, p < 0.001) were prognostic for improved OS. Patients who had unmethylated-MGMT tumours (OR 12.4, p = 0.034), ≥ 3 prior systemic treatment lines (OR 29.1, p = 0.022), interval to re-RT < 23.9 months (OR 9.0, p = 0.039), and re-RT PTV volume ≥ 112 cc (OR 17.8, p = 0.003) were more likely to die within 6 months of re-RT. The cumulative incidence of RN was 11.4% (95% CI 4.3-18.5) at 12 months. Concurrent bevacizumab use (HR < 0.001, p < 0.001) and cumulative equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2, α/β = 2) < 99 Gy2 (HR < 0.001, p < 0.001) were independent protective factors against RN. Re-RT allowed for less corticosteroid dependency. Sixty-six percent of failures after re-RT were in-field.

CONCLUSION

We observe favorable OS rates following re-RT and identified prognostic factors, including methylation status, that can assist in patient selection and clinical trial design. Concurrent use of bevacizumab mitigated the risk of RN.

NRG Oncology/RTOG1205: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Concurrent Bevacizumab and Reirradiation Versus Bevacizumab Alone as Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma

PURPOSE

To assess whether reirradiation (re-RT) and concurrent bevacizumab (BEV) improve overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS), compared with BEV alone in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). The primary objective was OS, and secondary objectives included PFS, response rate, and treatment adverse events (AEs) including delayed CNS toxicities.

METHODS

NRG Oncology/RTOG1205 is a prospective, phase II, randomized trial of re-RT and BEV versus BEV alone. Stratification factors included age, resection, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS). Patients with recurrent GBM with imaging evidence of tumor progression ≥ 6 months from completion of prior chemo-RT were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to re-RT, 35 Gy in 10 fractions, with concurrent BEV IV 10 mg/kg once in every 2 weeks or BEV alone until progression.

RESULTS

From December 2012 to April 2016, 182 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 170 were eligible. Patient characteristics were well balanced between arms. The median follow-up for censored patients was 12.8 months. There was no improvement in OS for BEV + RT, hazard ratio, 0.98; 80% CI, 0.79 to 1.23; P = .46; the median survival time was 10.1 versus 9.7 months for BEV + RT versus BEV alone. The median PFS for BEV + RT was 7.1 versus 3.8 months for BEV, hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.0; P = .05. The 6-month PFS rate improved from 29.1% (95% CI, 19.1 to 39.1) for BEV to 54.3% (95% CI, 43.5 to 65.1) for BEV + RT, P = .001. Treatment was well tolerated. There were a 5% rate of acute grade 3+ treatment-related AEs and no delayed high-grade AEs. Most patients died of recurrent GBM.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, NRG Oncology/RTOG1205 is the first prospective, randomized multi-institutional study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of re-RT in recurrent GBM using modern RT techniques. Overall, re-RT was shown to be safe and well tolerated. BEV + RT demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in PFS, specifically the 6-month PFS rate but no difference in OS.

Bevacizumab combined with re-irradiation in recurrent glioblastoma

Background

Glioblastoma is characterized by rich vasculature and abnormal vascular structure and function. Currently, there is no standard treatment for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). Bevacizumab (BEV) has established role of inhibiting neovascularization, alleviating hypoxia in the tumor area and activating the immune microenvironment. BEV may exert synergistic effects with re-irradiation (re-RT) to improve the tumor microenvironment for rGBM.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a combination of BEV and re-RT for rGBM treatment.

Methods

In this retrospective study, a total of 26 rGBM patients with surgical pathologically confirmed glioblastoma and at least one event of recurrence were enrolled. All patients were treated with re-RT in combination with BEV. BEV was administered until progression or serious adverse events.

Results

Median follow-up was 21.9 months for all patients, whereas median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.5–9.5 months). In addition, the 6-month and 1-year PFS rates were 65.4% and 28.2%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS), 6-month OS rate, and 1-year OS rate were 13.6 months (95% CI: 10.2–17.0 months), 92.3%, and 67.5%, respectively. The patient showed good tolerance during the treatment with no grade > 3 grade side event and radiation necrosis occurrence rate of 0%. Combined treatment of gross total resection (GTR) before re-RT and concurrent temozolomide during re-RT was an independent prognostic factor that affected both OS and PFS in the whole cohort (OS: 0.067, 95% CI: 0.009–0.521, p = 0.010; PFS: 0.238, 95% CI: 0.076–0.744, p = 0.038).

Conclusion

In this study, re-RT combined with concurrent and maintenance BEV treatment was safe, tolerable, and effective in rGBM patients. Moreover, GTR before re-RT and selective concurrent temozolomide could further improve patient PFS and OS.

Reirradiation: A complex situation

Reirradiation of a tumor recurrence or second cancer in a previously irradiated area is challenging due to lack of high-quality physical, radiobiological, clinical data and inherent substantial risks of toxicity with cumulative dose and uncertain tissue recovery. Yet, major advances have been made in radiotherapy techniques, that have the potential to achieve cure while limiting severe toxicity rates, but still much research is necessary to better appraise the therapeutic index in such a complex situation.

High-dose salvage re-irradiation in recurrent/progressive adult diffuse gliomas: development of a novel prognostic scoring system

PURPOSE

Over the past two decades, high-dose salvage re-irradiation (re-RT) has been used increasingly in the multimodality management of adults with recurrent/progressive diffuse glioma. Several factors that determine outcomes following re-RT have been incorporated into prognostic models to guide patient selection. We aimed to develop a novel four-tiered prognostic model incorporating relevant molecular markers from our single-institutional cohort of patients treated with high-dose salvage re-RT for recurrent/progressive diffuse glioma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Various patient, disease, and treatment-related factors impacting upon survival following salvage re-RT were identified through univariate analysis. Each of these prognostic factors was further subdivided and assigned scores of 0 (low-risk), 1 (intermediate-risk), or 2 (high-risk). Scores from individual prognostic factors were added to derive the cumulative score (ranging from 0 to 16), with increasing scores indicating worsening prognosis.

RESULTS

A total of 111 adults with recurrent/progressive diffuse glioma treated with salvage high-dose re-RT were included. We could assign patients into four prognostic subgroups (A=15 patients, score 0-3); (B=50 patients, score 4-7); (C=33 patients, score 8-10); and (D=13 patients, score 11-16) with completely non-overlapping survival curves suggesting the good discriminatory ability. Post-re-RT survival was significantly higher in Group A compared to groups B, C, and D, respectively (stratified log-rank p-value <0.0001).

CONCLUSION

There exists a lack of universally acceptable 'standard-of-care' salvage therapy for recurrent/progressive diffuse glioma. A novel four-tiered prognostic scoring system incorporating traditional factors as well as relevant molecular markers is proposed for selecting patients appropriately for high-dose salvage re-RT that warrants validation in a non-overlapping cohort.

Optimising tumour coverage and organ at risk sparing for hypofractionated re-irradiation in glioblastoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Re-irradiation may be used for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients. In some cases Planning Target Volume (PTV) under-coverage is necessary to meet organ at risk (OAR) constraints. This study aimed to develop a Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy planning solution for GBM re-irradiation including a means of assessing if target coverage would be achievable and how much PTV 'cropping' would be required to meet OAR constraints, based on PTV volume and OAR proximity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For 10 PTVs, 360°, 180°, two coplanar 180° and 180° + non-coplanar 45° arc arrangements were compared using 35 Gy in 10 fractions. Using the preferred arrangement, dose fall-off was modelled to determine the separation required between PTV and OAR to ensure OAR dose constraints were met, with data presented graphically. To evaluate the graph as an aid to planning, seven cases with overlap were replanned in two treatment planning systems (TPSs).

RESULTS

There were no significant dosimetric differences between arc arrangements. 180° was preferred due to shorter treatment times. The graph, which indicated if 95% PTV coverage would be achievable based on PTV volume and OAR proximity, was employed in seven cases to guide planning in two TPSs. Plans were deliverable.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-irradiation treatment planning can be challenging, especially when PTV under-coverage is necessary. 180° was considered optimal. To assist in the planning process, graphical guidance was produced to inform planners whether PTV under-coverage would be necessary and how much PTV 'cropping' would be required to meet constraints during optimisation.

Re-irradiation for high-grade gliomas: Has anything changed?

Optimal management after recurrence or progression of high-grade gliomas is still undefined and remains a challenge for neuro-oncology multidisciplinary teams. Improved radiation therapy techniques, new imaging methods, published experience, and a better radiobiological knowledge of brain tissue have positioned re-irradiation (re-RT) as an option for many of these patients. Decisions must be individualized, taking into account the pattern of relapse, previous treatment, and functional status, as well as the patient’s preferences and expected quality of life. Many questions remain unanswered with respect to re-RT: Who is the most appropriate candidate, which dose and fractionation are most effective, how to define the target volume, which imaging technique is best for planning, and what is the optimal timing? This review will focus on describing the most relevant studies that include re-RT as salvage therapy, with the aim of simplifying decision-making and designing the best available therapeutic strategy.

Current status and recent advances in reirradiation of glioblastoma

Despite aggressive management consisting of maximal safe surgical resection followed by external beam radiation therapy (60 Gy/30 fractions) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide, approximately 90% of WHO grade IV gliomas (glioblastomas, GBM) will recur locally within 2 years. For patients with recurrent GBM, no standard of care exists. Thanks to the continuous improvement in radiation science and technology, reirradiation has emerged as feasible approach for patients with brain tumors. Using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), either hypofractionated or conventionally fractionated schedules, several studies have suggested survival benefits following reirradiation of patients with recurrent GBM; however, there are still questions to be answered about the efficacy and toxicity associated with a second course of radiation. We provide a clinical overview on current status and recent advances in reirradiation of GBM, addressing relevant clinical questions such as the appropriate patient selection and radiation technique, optimal dose fractionation, reirradiation tolerance of the brain and the risk of radiation necrosis.

Glioblastoma treatment guidelines: Consensus by the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery Tumor Section

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastoma (GBM) treatment starts in most patients with surgery, either resection surgery or biopsy, to reach a histology diagnose. Multidisciplinar team, including specialists in brain tumors diagnose and treatment, must make an individualize assessment to get the maximum benefit of the available treatments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Experts in each GBM treatment field have briefly described it based in their experience and the reviewed of the literature.

RESULTS

Each area has been summarized and the consensus of the brain tumor group has been included at the end.

CONCLUSIONS

GBM are aggressive tumors with a dismal prognosis, however accurate treatments can improve overall survival and quality of life. Neurosurgeons must know treatment options, indications and risks to participate actively in the decision making and to offer the best surgical treatment in every case.

Low Fraction Size Re-irradiation for Large Volume Recurrence of Glial Tumours

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of re-irradiation (re-RT) in patients with advanced local relapses of glial tumours and to define the factors influencing the result of the hyper-fractionated external beam therapy on progression after primary management. We have analysed the data of 55 patients with brain tumours (GBM: 28) on progression, who were re-irradiated between January 2007 and December 2018. The mean volume of the recurrent tumour was 118 cm³, and the mean planning target volume (PTV) was 316 cm³, to which 32 Gy was delivered in 20 fractions at least 7.7 months after the first radiotherapy, using 3D conformal radiotherapy (CRT) or intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The median overall survival (mOS) from the re-RT was 8.4 months, and the 6-month and the 12-month OS rate was 64% and 31%, respectively. The most important factors by univariate analysis, which significantly improved the outcome of re-RT were the longer time interval between the diagnosis and second radiotherapy (p = 0.029), the lower histology grade (p = 0.034), volume of the recurrent tumour (p = 0.006) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (p = 0.009) at the re-irradiation. Our low fraction size re-irradiation ≥ 8 months after the first radiotherapy proved to be safe and beneficial for patients with large volume recurrent glial tumours.

Italian consensus and recommendations on diagnosis and treatment of low-grade gliomas. An intersociety (SINch/AINO/SIN) document

In 2018, the SINch (Italian Society of Neurosurgery) Neuro-Oncology Section, AINO (Italian Association of Neuro-Oncology) and SIN (Italian Association of Neurology) Neuro-Oncology Section formed a collaborative Task Force to look at the diagnosis and treatment of low-grade gliomas (LGGs). The Task Force included neurologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, a neuropsychologist and a methodologist. For operational purposes, the Task Force was divided into five Working Groups: diagnosis, surgical treatment, adjuvant treatments, supportive therapies, and follow-up. The resulting guidance document is based on the available evidence and provides recommendations on diagnosis and treatment of LGG patients, considering all aspects of patient care along their disease trajectory.

Digital biomarkers: Importance of patient stratification for re-irradiation of glioma patients - Review of latest developments regarding scoring assessment

PURPOSE

To review scoring assessments in re-irradiation of high-grade glioma (HGG) patients and how to use scoring for patient stratification. The next aim was to investigate the different approaches employed by the scoring systems and the way they can be applied to build homogeneous patient groups for a reliable prognosis.

METHODS

We searched the Medline/Pubmed and Web of science databases for relevant articles regarding scores for re-irradiation of recurrent HGG. All references were divided into the following groups: novel score establishment (n = 5), score validation (n = 6), not relevant to this evaluation (n = 26).

RESULTS

We identified five scoring systems. Two are modifications of an already existing score. Calculations differ immensely from easy point addition to a more complex formula with including three up to 10 individual parameters. Six validation articles were found for three of the scores; one was validated four times. Two scores were never validated.

CONCLUSION

For recurrent HGG, the clinical situation remains demanding. Due to the heterogeneity of data at re-irradiation, patient stratification is important. Several scoring systems have been developed to predict prognosis. As a digital biomarker, scores are of high value regarding quick patient assessment and therapy decision making. For the next generation of digital biomarkers, easy calculation, and inclusion of easily available parameters are crucial.

Appraisal of re-irradiation for the recurrent glioblastoma in the era of MGMT promotor methylation

Despite recent innovation in treatment techniques and subsequently improved outcomes, the majority of glioblastoma (GBL) have relapses, especially in locoregional areas. Local re-irradiation (re-RT) has been established as a feasible option for recurrent GBL of all ages with safety, tolerability, and effectiveness both in survival and quality of life regardless of fractionation schedule. To keep adverse effects under acceptable range, cumulative dose limit in equivalent dose at 2 Gy fractions by the linear-quadratic model at α/β = 2 for normal brain tissue (EQD2) with narrow margin should be observed and single/hypofractionated re-RT should be undertaken very carefully to recurrent tumor with large volume or adjacent to the brainstem. Promising outcome of re-operation (re-Op) plus re-RT (re-Op/RT) need to be validated and result from re-RT with temozolomide/bevacizumab (TMZ/BV) or new strategy is expected. Development of new-concept prognostic scoring or risk group is required to select patients properly and make use of predictive biomarkers such as O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor methylation that influence outcomes of re-RT, re-Op/RT, or re-RT with TMZ/BV.