Contact of a tumour with the pleura is not associated with regional recurrence following stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer

Quantification of the spatial distribution of primary tumors in the lung to develop new prognostic biomarkers for locally advanced NSCLC

The anatomical location and extent of primary lung tumors have shown prognostic value for overall survival (OS). However, its manual assessment is prone to interobserver variability. This study aims to use data driven identification of image characteristics for OS in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Five stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC patient cohorts were retrospectively collected. Patients were treated either with radiochemotherapy (RCT): RCT1* (n = 107), RCT2 (n = 95), RCT3 (n = 37) or with surgery combined with radiotherapy or chemotherapy: S1* (n = 135), S2 (n = 55). Based on a deformable image registration (MIM Vista, 6.9.2.), an in-house developed software transferred each primary tumor to the CT scan of a reference patient while maintaining the original tumor shape. A frequency-weighted cumulative status map was created for both exploratory cohorts (indicated with an asterisk), where the spatial extent of the tumor was uni-labeled with 2 years OS. For the exploratory cohorts, a permutation test with random assignment of patient status was performed to identify regions with statistically significant worse OS, referred to as decreased survival areas (DSA). The minimal Euclidean distance between primary tumor to DSA was extracted from the independent cohorts (negative distance in case of overlap). To account for the tumor volume, the distance was scaled with the radius of the volume-equivalent sphere. For the S1 cohort, DSA were located at the right main bronchus whereas for the RCT1 cohort they further extended in cranio-caudal direction. In the independent cohorts, the model based on distance to DSA achieved performance: AUC_RCT2 [95% CI] = 0.67 [0.55–0.78] and AUC_RCT3 = 0.59 [0.39–0.79] for RCT patients, but showed bad performance for surgery cohort (AUC_S2 = 0.52 [0.30–0.74]). Shorter distance to DSA was associated with worse outcome (p = 0.0074). In conclusion, this explanatory analysis quantifies the value of primary tumor location for OS prediction based on cumulative status maps. Shorter distance of primary tumor to a high-risk region was associated with worse prognosis in the RCT cohort.

[Prognosis factors after lung stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small cell lung carcinoma]

Lung cancer is the fourth most common cancer in France with a prevalence of 30,000 new cases per year. Lobectomy surgery with dissection is the gold standard treatment for T1-T2 localized non-small cell lung carcinoma. A segmentectomy may be proposed to operable patients but fragile from a respiratory point of view. For inoperable patients or patients with unsatisfactory pulmonary function tests, local treatment with stereotactic radiotherapy may be proposed to achieve local control rates ranging from 85 to 95% at 3-5 years. Several studies have examined prognostic factors after stereotaxic pulmonary radiotherapy. We conducted a general review of the literature to identify factors affecting local control.

Pleural contact decreases survival in clinical T1N0M0 lung cancer patients undergoing SBRT

BACKGROUND

Clinical staging, as used for patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early-stage lung cancer, inadequately accounts for pleural invasion, which is a pathologic criteria. Considering the current situation, we analyzed effects of relationships between tumors and the pleura on treatment outcomes of SBRT for early-stage lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among consecutive patients treated with SBRT between 2006 and 2017, we retrospectively identified non-small cell lung cancer patients with primary tumor diameters ≤4 cm and N0M0. The relationships between tumors and the pleura were investigated. The effects of these findings on treatment outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 386 patients which met the inclusion criteria. Among these patients, 323 patients were with tumors of 0.1-3.0 cm (T1-size), and 63 patients were with tumors of 3.1-4.0 cm (T2a-size). Among patients with T1-size tumors, 120, 134, and 23 had findings of pleural contact, pleural indentation, and pleural thickening, respectively. When we divided T1-size patients into 2 groups based on pleural contact (contact- or contact+), the 3-year cause-specific mortality and overall survival in patients with T1-size & contact+ were significantly worse than those in patients with T1-size & contact- (17.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 10.7-25.9%) vs. 6.6% (95% CI, 3.5-11.1%), p < 0.01), and 58.2% (95% CI, 47.6-67.5%) vs. 77.6% (95% CI, 70.5-83.2%), p < 0.01). Local recurrence, regional recurrence, pleural cavity recurrence, and distant metastasis were associated with worse cause-specific mortality and overall survival. On multivariate analysis, pleural contact was associated with cause-specific mortality (hazard ratio (HR), 1.96; 95% CI, 1.09-3.52; p = 0.03) and overall survival (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.08-2.34; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Pleural contact in clinical T1N0M0 lung cancer patients was associated with significantly worse survivals.