1
|
Azemar N, Fontbonne C, Claude Quintyn J, Lebertz D, Marc Fontbonne J, Thariat J. Assessment of gaze direction during head and neck irradiation and dosimetric impact on the retina, macula and papilla in a cohort of 240 patients with paraoptic tumors. Radiother Oncol 2024; 197:110342. [PMID: 38782302 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
In a prospective cohort of 240 paraoptic tumors patients treated with protons, there was 10° inter-individual gaze angle variability (up to 30°). In a random 21-patient subset with initial CTs versus and adaptive CTs, 6 (28.57 %) patients had at least twice a 10°-difference in their gaze angle, with > 5 Gy difference on the retina/macula or papilla in 2/21 (9.52 %) and 1/21 (4.76 %) based on cumulative dose from rescans, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Azemar
- Université de Caen Normandie, ENSICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC Caen UMR6534, Caen F-14000, France.
| | - Cathy Fontbonne
- Université de Caen Normandie, ENSICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC Caen UMR6534, Caen F-14000, France
| | | | - Dorothee Lebertz
- Université de Caen Normandie, ENSICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC Caen UMR6534, Caen F-14000, France; Department of Radiation Therapy, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Jean Marc Fontbonne
- Université de Caen Normandie, ENSICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC Caen UMR6534, Caen F-14000, France
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Université de Caen Normandie, ENSICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC Caen UMR6534, Caen F-14000, France; Department of Radiation Therapy, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shaaban SG, LeCompte MC, Kleinberg LR, Redmond KJ, Page BR. Recognition and Management of the Long-term Effects of Cranial Radiation. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:880-891. [PMID: 37145381 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01078-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Cranial radiation is ubiquitous in the treatment of primary malignant and benign brain tumors as well as brain metastases. Improvement in radiotherapy targeting and delivery has led to prolongation of survival outcomes. As long-term survivorship improves, we also focus on prevention of permanent side effects of radiation and mitigating the impact when they do occur. Such chronic treatment-related morbidity is a major concern with significant negative impact on patient's and caregiver's respective quality of life. The actual mechanisms responsible for radiation-induced brain injury remain incompletely understood. Multiple interventions have been introduced to potentially prevent, minimize, or reverse the cognitive deterioration. Hippocampal-sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy and memantine represent effective interventions to avoid damage to regions of adult neurogenesis. Radiation necrosis frequently develops in the high radiation dose region encompassing the tumor and surrounding normal tissue. The radiographic findings in addition to the clinical course of the patients' symptoms are taken into consideration to differentiate between tissue necrosis and tumor recurrence. Radiation-induced neuroendocrine dysfunction becomes more pronounced when the hypothalamo-pituitary (HP) axis is included in the radiation treatment field. Baseline and post-treatment evaluation of hormonal profile is warranted. Radiation-induced injury of the cataract and optic system can develop when these structures receive an amount of radiation that exceeds their tolerance. Special attention should always be paid to avoid irradiation of these sensitive structures, if possible, or minimize their dose to the lowest limit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherif G Shaaban
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, 401 North Broadway, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Michael C LeCompte
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, 401 North Broadway, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Lawrence R Kleinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, 401 North Broadway, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, 401 North Broadway, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Brandi R Page
- Department of Radiation Oncology-National Capitol Region, Johns Hopkins Medicine, 6420 Rockledge Drive Suite 1200, Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kinaci-Tas B, Alderliesten T, Verbraak FD, Rasch CRN. Radiation-Induced Retinopathy and Optic Neuropathy after Radiation Therapy for Brain, Head, and Neck Tumors: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15071999. [PMID: 37046660 PMCID: PMC10093581 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15071999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Patients with brain, head, and neck tumors experience a decline in their quality of life due to radiation retinopathy and optic neuropathy. Little is known about the dose–response relationship and patient characteristics. We aimed to systematically review the prevalence of radiation retinopathy and optic neuropathy. Method: The primary outcome was the pooled prevalence of radiation retinopathy and optic neuropathy. The secondary outcome included the effect of the total radiation dose prescribed for the tumor according to the patient’s characteristics. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate the radiation dose parameters for organs at risk of radiation retinopathy and optic neuropathy. Results: The pooled prevalence was 3.8%. No retinopathy was reported for the tumor’s prescribed dose of <50 Gy. Optic neuropathy was more prevalent for a prescribed dose of >50 Gy than <50 Gy. We observed a higher prevalence rate for retinopathy (6.0%) than optic neuropathy (2.0%). Insufficient data on the dose for organs at risk were reported. Conclusion: The prevalence of radiation retinopathy was higher compared to optic neuropathy. This review emphasizes the need for future studies considering retinopathy and optic neuropathy as primary objective parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Buket Kinaci-Tas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| | - Tanja Alderliesten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank D. Verbraak
- Department of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VU Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Coen R. N. Rasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carey AR, Page BR, Miller N. Radiation-induced optic neuropathy: a review. Br J Ophthalmol 2022; 107:743-749. [DOI: 10.1136/bjo-2022-322854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Radiation is a commonly used treatment modality for head and neck as well as CNS tumours, both benign and malignant. As newer oncology treatments such as immunotherapies allow for longer survival, complications from radiation therapy are becoming more common. Radiation-induced optic neuropathy is a feared complication due to rapid onset and potential for severe and bilateral vision loss. Careful monitoring of high-risk patients and early recognition are crucial for initiating treatment to prevent severe vision loss due to a narrow therapeutic window. This review discusses presentation, aetiology, recent advances in diagnosis using innovative MRI techniques and best practice treatment options based on the most recent evidence-based medicine.
Collapse
|
5
|
Takahashi D, Demizu Y, Koto M, Kubo N, Suefuji H, Ikawa H, Ohno T, Shioyama Y, Okimoto T, Tsuji H. Multicenter study of re-irradiation using carbon-ions for head and neck malignancies after photon radiotherapy. Cancer Med 2022; 11:3593-3601. [PMID: 35393701 PMCID: PMC9554451 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The goal of this multicenter retrospective study of patients with head and neck malignancies was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carbon‐ion (C‐ion) radiotherapy (RT) after photon RT. Methods We enrolled 56 patients with head and neck malignancies who underwent re‐irradiation (re‐RT) using C‐ions between November 2003 and March 2019, treated previously with photon RT. The tumors at re‐RT were located in the sinonasal cavities (n = 20, 35.7%), skull base (n = 12, 21.4%), and orbit (n = 7, 12.5%). The tumors at the initial RT were located in the sinonasal cavities (n = 13, 23.2%), skull base (n = 9, 16.1%), and orbit (n = 9, 16.1%). The median period between the initial RT and re‐RT was 41 (4–568) months. The most common histology of re‐RT was squamous cell carcinoma (n = 11, 19.6%). The most commonly used protocol was 57.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 16 fractions (n = 23, 41.1%). Surgery preceded re‐RT in three patients (5.4%). One patient with malignant melanoma received concurrent chemotherapy. Results The 2‐year local control, progression‐free survival, and overall survival rates were 66.5%, 36.9%, and 67.9%, respectively. The median follow‐up time was 28 months. Two patients (3.6%) developed grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities, and 14 (25.0%) developed grade ≥ 3 late toxicities. A single patient had confirmed grade 5 dermatitis with infection. Conclusion Re‐RT using C‐ions for head and neck malignancies after photon RT is an effective treatment with tolerable toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daiki Takahashi
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan
| | - Yusuke Demizu
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Japan
| | - Masashi Koto
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Nobuteru Kubo
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan
| | | | - Hiroaki Ikawa
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan
| | | | - Tomoaki Okimoto
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tsuji
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dağdelen M, Akbaş ZŞ, Barlas C, Can G, Arıcı C, Uzel Ö. Evaluation of Retinal and Optic Disc Vascular Changes and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Following Image Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2022; 38:102887. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
7
|
Long-Term Evaluation and Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) Models for Predicting Radiation-Induced Optic Neuropathy after Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Large Retrospective Study in China. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022; 2022:3647462. [PMID: 35251172 PMCID: PMC8890878 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3647462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To quantify the long-term evaluation of optic chiasma (OC) and/or optic nerve(s) (ONs) and to develop predictive models for radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods and Materials A total of 3,662 patients' OC/ONs with full visual acuity and dosimetry data between 2010 and 2015 were identified. Critical dosimetry predictors of RION were chosen by machine learning and penalized regression for survival. A nomogram containing dosimetry and clinical variables was generated for predicting RION-free survival. Results The median follow-up was 71.79 (2.63–120.9) months. Sixty-six eyes in 51 patients (1.39%) developed RION. Two patients were visual field deficient, and 49 patients had visual acuity of less than 0.1 (20/200). The median latency time was 36 (3–90) months. The 3-, 5-, and 8-year cumulative incidence of RION was 0.78%, 1.19%, and 1.97%, respectively. Dmax was the most critical dosimetry variable for RION (AUC: 0.9434, the optimal cutoff: 64.48 Gy). Patients with a Dmax ≥64.48 Gy had a significantly higher risk of RION (HR = 102.25; 95%CI, 24.86–420.59; P < 0.001). Age (>44 years) (HR = 2.234, 95% CI = 1.233–4.051, p = 0.008), advanced T stage (T3 vs. T1-2: HR = 7.516, 95% CI = 1.725–32.767, p=0.007; T4 vs. T1-2: HR = 37.189, 95% CI = 8.796–157.266, P < 0.001), and tumor infiltration/compression of the OC/ONs (HR = 4.572, 95% CI = 1.316–15.874, p=0.017) were significant clinical risk factors of RION. A nomogram comprising age, T stage, tumor infiltration/compression of the OC/ON, and Dmax significantly outperformed the model, with only Dmax predicting RION (C-index: 0.916 vs. 0.880, P < 0.001 in the training set; 0.899 vs. 0.874, P=0.038 in the test set). The nomogram-defined high-risk group had a worse 8-year RION-free survival. Conclusions In the IMRT era, Dmax <60 Gy is safe and represents an acceptable dose constraint for most NPC patients receiving IMRT. A reasonable trade-off for selected patients with unsatisfactory tumor coverage due to proximity to the optic apparatus would be Dmax <65 Gy. Caution should be exercised when treating elderly and advanced T-stage patients or those with tumor infiltration/compression of the OC/ON. Our nomogram shows strong efficacy in predicting RION.
Collapse
|
8
|
Lecornu M, Lesueur P, Salleron J, Balosso J, Stefan D, Kao W, Plouhinec T, Vela A, Dutheil P, Bouter J, Marty PA, Thariat J, Quintyn JC. Prospective Assessment of Early Proton Therapy-Induced Optic Neuropathy in Patients With Intracranial, Orbital or Sinonasal Tumors: Impact of A Standardized Ophthalmological Follow Up. Front Oncol 2021; 11:673886. [PMID: 34211847 PMCID: PMC8239302 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.673886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton therapy (PT) can be a good option to achieve tumor control while reducing the probability of radiation induced toxicities compared to X-ray-based radiotherapy. However, there are still uncertainties about the effects of PT on the organs in direct contact with the irradiated volume. The aim of this prospective series was to report 6-month follow-up of clinical and functional optic neuropathy rates of patients treated by proton therapy using a standardized comprehensive optic examination. METHODS AND MATERIALS Standardized ophthalmological examinations were performed to analyze subclinical anomalies in a systematic way before treatment and 6 months after the end of proton therapy with: Automatic visual field, Visual evoked potential (VEP) and optic coherence of tomography (OCT). RESULTS From October 2018 to July 2020 we analyzed 81 eyes. No significant differences were found in the analysis of the clinical examination of visual functions by the radiation oncologist. However, considering VEP, the impairment was statistically significant for both fibers explored at 30'angle (p:0.007) and 60'angle (p <0.001). In patients with toxicity, the distance of the target volume from the optical pathways was more important with a p-value for 30'VEP at 0.035 and for 60'VEP at 0.039. CONCLUSIONS These results confirm uncertainties concerning relative biological effectiveness of proton therapy, linear energy transfer appears to be more inhomogeneous especially in areas close to the target volumes. The follow-up of patients after proton therapy is not an easy process to set up but it is necessary to improve our knowledges about the biological effects of proton therapy in real life. Our study which will continue during the coming years, suggests that follow-up with in-depth examinations such as VEP as a biomarker could improve the detection of early abnormalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Lecornu
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Paul Lesueur
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Guillaume le Conquérant, Caen, France
- ISTCT UMR6030-CNRS, CEA, Université de Caen-Normandie, Equipe CERVOxy, Caen, France
| | - Julia Salleron
- Cellule Data Biostatistique, Instistut de Cancerologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Jacques Balosso
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Dinu Stefan
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - William Kao
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | - Anthony Vela
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Pauline Dutheil
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Jordan Bouter
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | - Juliette Thariat
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang T, Xu M, Mi J, Yang H, Liu Z, Huang L, Hu K, Wang R. Loosening Neuro-Optic Structures Dosimetric Constraints Provides High 5-Year Local Recurrence-Free Survival With Acceptable Toxicity in T4 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:598320. [PMID: 33692949 PMCID: PMC7937960 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.598320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Whether the original dosimetric constraints of neuro-optic structures (NOS) are appropriate for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) remains controversial. The present study compared the survival rates and radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) occurrence between T4 NPC patients whose NOS were irradiated with a near maximum dose received by 2% of the volume (D2%) >55 Gy and ≤55 Gy. Moreover, the NOS dosimetric parameters and their correlation with RION occurrence were also evaluated. Methods In this retrospective study, 256 T4 NPC patients treated with IMRT between May 2009 and December 2013 were included. Patient characteristics, survival rates, dosimetric parameters, and RION incidence were compared between the D2% ≤55 Gy and D2% >55 Gy groups. Results The median follow-up durations were 87 and 83 months for patients in the D2% >55 Gy and D2% ≤55 Gy groups, respectively. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates were 92.0 and 84.0% in the D2% >55 Gy and D2% ≤55 Gy groups (P = 0.043), respectively. There was no significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (OS) between both groups (D2% >55 Gy, 81.6%; D2% ≤55 Gy, 79.4%; P = 0.586). No patients developed severe RION (Grades 3–5), and there was no significant difference (P = 0.958) in the incidence of RION between the two groups. The maximum dose of NOS significantly affected the RION incidence, with a cutoff point of 70.77 Gy. Conclusion Appropriately loosening NOS dosimetric constraints in order to ensure a more sufficient dose to the target volume can provide a better 5-year local recurrence-free survival and acceptable neuro-optic toxicity in T4 NPC patients undergoing IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Meng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Jinglin Mi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Hui Yang
- Department of Oncology, Liuzhou Worker Hospital, Liuzhou, China
| | - Zhengchun Liu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China
| | - Lulu Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Kai Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Rensheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
[Optic disc metastasis in a patient with breast cancer]. J Fr Ophtalmol 2021; 44:e267-e273. [PMID: 33581917 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2020.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
11
|
Vanmarcke D, Menten J, Defraene G, Van Calenbergh F, De Vleeschouwer S, Lambrecht M. Stroke rate after external fractionated radiotherapy for benign meningioma. J Neurooncol 2021; 152:99-106. [PMID: 33394261 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03678-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with a benign meningioma often have a long survival following the treatment of their meningioma. Since radiotherapy is frequently part of the treatment, long-term side effects are of considerable concern. A controversial long-term side effect of radiotherapy is stroke. Due to its severity, it is important to know the frequency of this side effect. The aim of this study was to assess the stroke incidence and risk factors among patients receiving radiotherapy for their benign meningioma. METHODS We performed a retrospective database study of patients who underwent primary or adjuvant radiotherapy for their benign meningioma at University Hospitals Leuven from January 2003 to December 2017. RESULTS We included 169 patients with a median age of 51 years (range 22-84). Every patient received fractionated radiotherapy using photons with a median dose of 56 Gy (range 54-56) in fractions of 2 Gy (range 1.8-2). The median follow-up was 5.3 years (range 0.1-14). The cumulative stroke incidence function showed an incidence of 11.6% after 9 years of follow-up, translating to a stroke incidence per year of 1.29%. We found two significant risk factors for stroke: medically treated arterial hypertension (p = 0.005) and history of previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (p < 0.001). 5-year local control and overall survival rates were respectively 97.4% and 91.2%. Other late grade III/IV toxicities occurred in 16.0% (27/169) of patients. CONCLUSION Our study shows a higher incidence of stroke in patients who received radiotherapy for their benign meningioma compared to the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Johan Menten
- Radiotherapy-Oncology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gilles Defraene
- Department of Oncology-Laboratory Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Liu Y, Gu X. Evaluation and comparison of global-feature-based and local-feature-based segmentation algorithms in intracranial visual pathway delineation. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2020; 2020:1766-1769. [PMID: 33018340 DOI: 10.1109/embc44109.2020.9175937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Intracranial visual pathway is related to the effective transmission of visual signals to brain. It was not only the target organ of diseases but also the organs at risk in radiotherapy thus its delineation plays an important role in both diagnosis and treatment planning. Traditional manual segmentation method suffered from time- and labor- consuming as well as intra- and inter- variability. In order to overcome these problems, state-of-the-art segmentation models were designed and various features were extracted and utilized, but it's hard to tell their effectiveness on intracranial visual pathway delineation. It's because that these methods worked on different dataset and accompanied with different training tricks. This study aimed to research the contribution of global features and local features in delineating the intracranial visual pathway from MRI scans. The two typical segmentation models, 3D UNet and DeepMedic, were chosen since they focused on global features and local features respectively. We constructed the hybrid model through serially connecting the two mentioned models to validate the performance of combined global and local features. Validation results showed that the hybrid model outperformed the individual ones. It proved that multi scale feature fusion was important in improving the segmentation performance.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ramos-Prudencio R, Pérez-Álvarez SI, Flores-Balcazar CH, de León-Alfaro MA, Herrera-González JA, Elizalde-Cabrera J, Rubalcava-Ortega J, Espinoza-Alvarado L, Balderrama-Ibarra RI. Radiotherapy for the treatment of pituitary adenomas: A dosimetric comparison of three planning techniques. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:586-593. [PMID: 32508534 PMCID: PMC7264003 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Our goal was to compare conformal 3D (C3D) radiotherapy (RT), modulated intensity RT (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning techniques in treating pituitary adenomas. BACKGROUND RT is important for managing pituitary adenomas. Treatment planning advances allow for higher radiation dosing with less risk of affecting organs at risk (OAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a 5-year retrospective review of patients with pituitary adenoma treated with external beam radiation therapy (C3D with flattening filter, flattening filter-free [FFF], IMRT, and VMAT). We compared dose-volume histogram data. For OARs, we recorded D2%, maximum, and mean doses. For planning target volume (PTV), we registered V95%, V107%, D95%, D98%, D50%, D2%, minimum dose, conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI). RESULTS Fifty-eight patients with pituitary adenoma were included. Target-volume coverage was acceptable for all techniques. The HI values were 0.06, IMRT; 0.07, VMAT; 0.08, C3D; and 0.09, C3D FFF (p < 0.0001). VMAT and IMRT provided the best target volume conformity (CI, 0.64 and 0.74, respectively; p < 0.0001). VMAT yielded the lowest doses to the optic pathway, lens, and cochlea. The position of the neck in extreme flexion showed that it helps in planning mainly with VMAT by allowing only one arc to be used and achieving the desired conformity, decreasing the treatment time, while allowing greater protection to the organs of risk using C3D, C3DFFF. CONCLUSIONS Our results confirmed that EBRT in pituitary adenomas using IMRT, VMAT, C3D, C3FFF provide adequate coverage to the target. VMAT with a single arc or incomplete arc had a better compliance with desired dosimetric goals, such as target coverage and normal structures dose constraints, as well as shorter treatment time. Neck extreme flexion may have benefits in treatment planning for better preservation of organs at risk. C3D with extreme neck flexion is an appropriate treatment option when other treatment techniques are not available.
Collapse
Key Words
- C3D, conformal three-dimensional radiotherapy
- CFRT, conventional fractionated radiotherapy
- CI, conformity index
- CT, computed tomography
- CTV, clinical target volume
- Conformal radiotherapy
- DVH, dose-volume histogram
- EBRT, external beam radiation therapy
- ESAPI, Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface
- FF, flattening filter
- FFF, flattening filter free
- GTV, gross tumor volume
- HI, homogeneity index
- IMRT
- IMRT, modulated intensity radiotherapy
- MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
- OAR, organs at risk
- PTV, planning target volume
- Pituitary adenomas
- RION, radiation-induced neuropathy
- RT, radiotherapy
- SRS, stereotactic radiosurgery
- VMAT
- VMAT, volumetric modulated arc therapy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rubi Ramos-Prudencio
- Department of Radiotherapy, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Belisario Domínguez, Sección XVI, Tlalpan, México City 14080, Mexico
| | - Sandra Ileana Pérez-Álvarez
- Department of Radiotherapy, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Belisario Domínguez, Sección XVI, Tlalpan, México City 14080, Mexico
| | - Christian Haydée Flores-Balcazar
- Department of Radiotherapy, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Belisario Domínguez, Sección XVI, Tlalpan, México City 14080, Mexico
| | - Mayra Angélica de León-Alfaro
- Department of Radiotherapy, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Belisario Domínguez, Sección XVI, Tlalpan, México City 14080, Mexico
| | - José Alfredo Herrera-González
- Division of Radiotherapy, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, 22 San Fernando Ave, Sección XVI, Tlalpan, México City 14080, Mexico
| | - Jonathan Elizalde-Cabrera
- Division of Radiotherapy, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, 22 San Fernando Ave, Sección XVI, Tlalpan, México City 14080, Mexico
| | - Johnatan Rubalcava-Ortega
- Department of Neuroimaging, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Belisario Domínguez, Sección XVI, Tlalpan, México City 14080, Mexico
| | - Lissett Espinoza-Alvarado
- Department of Neuroimaging, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Belisario Domínguez, Sección XVI, Tlalpan, México City 14080, Mexico
| | - Ricardo Iván Balderrama-Ibarra
- Department of Radiotherapy, Instituto Mexicano Del Seguro Social (IMSS), Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente, Universidad de Guadalajara, Independencia Oriente, Guadalajara 44340, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|