An evaluation of the mid-ventilation method for the planning of stereotactic lung plans

"Mid-P strategy" versus "internal target volume strategy in locally advanced non small cell lung cancer: Clinical results from the randomized non-comparative phase II study Mid-P

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) reported poor 5-year survival rates with frequent local or regional recurrences. Personalized RT may contribute to improve control and clinical outcome. We investigated efficacy and tolerance of "Mid-position" (Mid-P) strategy versus the conventional Internal Target Volume (ITV) strategy in LA-NSCLC patients treated by definitive conformal radiotherapy.

METHODS

This prospective non-comparative randomized monocentric phase II trial included adult patients with non-resected, non-metastatic, non-previously irradiated proven LA-NSCLC treated with definitive normo-fractionated conformal radiotherapy (+/- chemotherapy). Allocated patients (randomisation 2:1) were treated using Mid-P or ITV strategy. A Fleming single-stage design (1-sided α = 0.1, 80 % power, P0 = 30 %, P1 = 50 %) planned enrolment of 36 patients in the Mid-P group. The ITV group ensured the absence of selection bias. The primary outcome was 1-year progression-free- survival (1y-PFS) rate.

RESULTS

Among 54 eligible patients included from September 2012 to May 2018, 51 patients were analyzed (Mid-P: N = 34; ITV: 17). The 1y-PFS was 38 % (1-sided 95 %CI 25 %-not reached) with Mid-P strategy, and 47 % (95 %CI [27 %-not reached[) with ITV. Loco-regional failure as first event mainly occurred within radiation-field regardless the strategy. Acute and middle-term radiation toxicities were observed with both strategies.

CONCLUSION

Local control and survival remain poor using the Mid-P strategy in this prospective randomized non-comparative monocentric study investigating Mid-P strategy versus ITV strategy in LA-NSCLC. Since the Mid-P strategy is not integrated into routine software, and perceived as a time-consuming method, Mid-P strategy cannot be recommended in LA-NSCLCC treated by definitive normo-fractionated conformal radiotherapy outside clinical trials.

Assessing the impact of intrafraction motion correction on PTV margins and target and OAR dosimetry for single-fraction free-breathing lung stereotactic body radiation therapy

The objective of this research is to investigate intrafraction motion correction on planning target volume (PTV) margin requirements and target and organ-at-risk (OAR) dosimetry in single-fraction lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Sixteen patients (15 with upper lobe lesions, 1 with a middle lobe lesion) were treated with single-fraction lung SBRT. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were acquired before the treatment, between the arcs, and after the delivery of the treatment fraction. Shifts from the reference images were recorded in anterior-posterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI), and lateral (LAT) dimensions. The deviations from the reference image were calculated for 3 clinical scenarios: not applying intratreatment couch shifts and not correcting for pretreatment deviations < 3 mm ( scenario 1), not applying intratreatment couch shifts and correcting for pretreatment deviations < 3 mm ( scenario 2), and applying all pre- and intratreatment couch shifts (scenario 3). PTV margins were determined using the van Herk formalism for each scenario and maximum and average deviations were assessed. The clinical scenarios were modelled in the treatment planning system based on each patient dataset to assess target and OAR dosimetry. Calculated lower-bound PTV margins in the AP, SI, and LAT dimensions were [4.6, 3.5, 2.3] mm in scenario 1, [4.6, 2.4, 2.2] mm in scenario 2, and [1.7, 1.2, 1.0] mm in scenario 3. The margins are lower bounds because they do not include contributions from nonmotion related errors. Average and maximum intrafraction deviations were larger in the AP dimension compared to the SI and LAT dimensions for all scenarios. A unidimensional movement (several mm) in the negative AP dimension was observed in clinical scenarios 1 and 2 but not scenario 3. Average intrafraction deviation vectors were 1.2, 1.1, and 0.3 mm for scenarios 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Modelled clinical scenarios revealed that using scenario 3 yields significantly fewer treatment plan objective failures compared to scenarios 1 and 2 using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Intratreatment motion correction between each arc may enable reductions PTV margin requirements. It may also compensate for unidimensional negative AP movement, and improve target and OAR dosimetry.

Individualized breathing trace quality assurance for lung radiotherapy patients undergoing 4DCT simulation

4DCT simulation is a popular solution for radiotherapy simulation of lung cancer patients as it allows the clinician to gain an appreciation for target motion during the patient breathing cycle. Resultant binning of images and production of the 4DCT dataset relies heavily on the recorded breathing trace; but quality assurance is not routinely performed on these and there lacks any substantial recommendations thereof. An application was created for Windows in C# that was able to analyze the VXP breathing trace files from Varian RPM/RGSC and quantify various metrics associated with the patient breathing cycle. This data was then used to consider errors in voluming of targets for several example cases in order to justify recommendations on quality assurance. For 281 real patient breathing traces from 4DCT simulation of lung targets, notable differences were found between RGSC and application calculations of phase data. For any new patient without individualized QA, the average marked phase calculation (which is used for 4DCT reconstruction) is only accurate to within 19% of the actual phases. The error in BPM within the scan due to breathing rate variation is 37%. The uncertainty in amplitude due to breathing variation is 34% in the mean. Phase uncertainty leads to misbinning which we have shown can lead to missing 66% of the target for gated treatment. Variation in inhalation/exhalation level leads to voluming errors which, without individualized QA, can be assumed to be 11% (PTV is smaller than actual). Without individualized quality assurance of patient breathing traces, large uncertainties have to be assumed for metrics of both phase and amplitude, leading to clinically significant uncertainties in treatment. It is recommended to perform individualized quality assurance as this provides the clinician with an accurate quantification of uncertainty for their patient.

Dosimetric robustness of lung tumor photon radiotherapy evaluated from multiple event CT imaging

PURPOSE

Intrafractional respiratory motion is a concern for lung tumor radiotherapy but full evaluation of its impact is hampered by the lack of images representing the true motion. This study presents a novel evaluation using free-breathing images acquired over realistic treatment times to study the dosimetric impact of respiratory motion in photon radiotherapy.

METHODS

Cine-CT images of 14 patients with lung cancer acquired during eight minutes of free-breathing at three occasions were used to simulate dose tracking of four different planning methods. These methods aimed to deliver 54 Gy in three fractions to D_50% of the target and were denoted as robust 4D (RB4), homogeneous fluence to the ITV (FLU) and an isodose prescription to the ITV with a high central dose (ISD), concurrently renormalized (IRN). Differences in dose coverage probability and homogeneity between the methods were quantified. Correlations between underdosage and attributes regarding the tumor and its motion were investigated.

RESULTS

Despite tumor motion amplitudes being larger than in the 4DCT all but FLU achieved the intended CTV D_50% for the cohort average. For all methods but IRN at least 93% of the patients would have received 95% of the intended dose. No differences in D_50% were found between RB4 and ISD nor IRN. However, RB4 led to better homogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor motion in free-breathing not covered by the 4DCT had a small impact on dose. The RB4 is recommended for planning of free-breathing treatments. No factor was found that consistently correlated dose degradation with patient or motion attributes.

Incorporation of tumor motion directionality in margin recipe: The directional MidP strategy

PURPOSE

Planning target volume (PTV) definition based on Mid-Position (Mid-P) strategy typically integrates breathing motion from tumor positions variances along the conventional axes of the DICOM coordinate system. Tumor motion directionality is thus neglected even though it is one of its stable characteristics in time. We therefore propose the directional MidP approach (MidP dir), which allows motion directionality to be incorporated into PTV margins. A second objective consists in assessing the ability of the proposed method to better take care of respiratory motion uncertainty.

METHODS

11 lung tumors from 10 patients with supra-centimetric motion were included. PTV were generated according to the MidP and MidP dir strategies starting from planning 4D CT.

RESULTS

PTV_{MidP dir} volume didn't differ from the PTV_MidP volume: 31351 mm³ IC95% [17242-45459] vs. 31003 mm³ IC95% [ 17347-44659], p = 0.477 respectively. PTV_{MidP dir} morphology was different and appeared more oblong along the main motion axis. The relative difference between 3D and 4D doses was on average 1.09%, p = 0.011 and 0.74%, p = 0.032 improved with directional MidP for D_99% and D_95%. D_2% was not significantly different between both approaches. The improvement in dosimetric coverage fluctuated substantially from one lesion to another and was all the more important as motion showed a large amplitude, some obliquity with respect to conventional axes and small hysteresis.

CONCLUSIONS

Directional MidP method allows tumor motion to be taken into account more tightly as a geometrical uncertainty without increasing the irradiation volume.

Margin calculation for multiple lung metastases treated with single-isocenter SBRT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A single-isocenter stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) approach for multiple lung metastases has the potential to lower cumulative patient dose and reduce overall treatment time. However, the magnitude of inter-lesion position variation is currently unknown and not incorporated in margin calculations. The aim of this study was to quantify inter-lesion position variation and calculate safety margins for single-isocenter lung SBRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 83 pairs of pulmonary metastases from 42 NSCLC patients were used to calculate relative inter-lesion position variation by lesion-based registration of planning CT and verification CBCT. Furthermore, β-value assessment of van Herk's margin formula was performed by evaluating the distance between planned and blurred dose profiles of simulated spherical lesions, to evaluate its validity for heterogeneously planned dose distributions. Population-based ITV to PTV margins were calculated using the entire dataset and using subgroups with significant differences in relative inter-lesion position variation.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD inter-lesion position variation was 1.2 ± 1.1 mm as 3D-vector. Inter-lesion position variation was significantly increased if ≥1 lesion was not attached to the pleura or lesions were distant. The simulation showed that the combined SD of the random errors contributed to the margin only in the SI direction with 0.25∙σ_tot for a 65% dose prescription. When incorporating inter-lesion position variation, the safety margins increased from 5.6, 5.8, 5.2 mm (AP, SI, LR) to 6.0, 6.6, 5.5 mm for the entire cohort.

CONCLUSION

Relative inter-lesion position variation is influenced by inter-target distance and location and can be compensated with additional safety margins of <1 mm using single-isocenter SBRT.

Feasibility of a TPS-integrated method to incorporate tumor motion in the margin recipe

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There are several alternatives to the widespread ITV strategy in order to account for breathing-induced motion in PTV margins. The most sophisticated one includes the generation of a motion-compensated CT scan with the CTV placed in its average position - the mid-position approach (MidP). In such configuration, PTV margins integrate breathing as another random error. Despite overall irradiated volume reduction, such approach is barely used in clinical practice because of its dependence to deformable registration and its unavailability in commercial treatment planning systems. As an alternative, the mid-ventilation approach (MidV) selects the phase in the 4D-CT scan that is the closest to the MidP, with a residual error accounted for in the PTV margin. We propose a treatment planning system-integrated strategy, aiming at better approximating the MidP approach without its drawbacks: Hybrid MidV-MidP approach, i.e., the delineation on the MidV-CT and translation at the mid-position coordinates using treatment planning system built-in capabilities.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-five lung lesions treated with stereotactic radiotherapy were selected. PTV was defined using MidP, MidV, Hybrid MidV-MidP and ITV strategies. Margin definitions were adapted and resulting PTVs were compared.

RESULTS

Hybrid MidV-MidP showed similar target volume and location than the MidP and confirmed that margin-incorporated tumor motion strategies lead to significantly smaller PTVs than the ITV with mean reduction of 26 ± 7%.

CONCLUSION

We report on the successful implementation of a pseudo-MidP solution without its inherent drawbacks. It answers the need for TPS-embedded tumor motion range identification and related margin's component calculation.

Software simulation of tumour motion dose effects during flattened and unflattened ITV-based VMAT lung SBRT

Purpose

Restricted studies comparing different dose rate parameters are available while ITV-based VMAT lung SBRT planning leads to perform the analysis of the most suitable parameters of the external beams used. The special emphasis was placed on the impact of dose rate on dose distribution variations in target volumes due to interplay effects.

Methods

Four VMAT plans were calculated for 15 lung tumours using 6 MV photon beam quality (flattening filter FF vs. flattening filter free FFF beams) and maximum dose rate of 600 MU/min, 1000 MU/min and 1400 MU/min. Three kinds of motion simulations were performed finally giving 180 plans with perturbed dose distributions.

Results

6FFF-1400 MUs/min plans were characterized by the shortest beam on time (1.8 ± 0.2 min). Analysing the performed motion simulation results, the mean dose (Dmean) is not a sensitive parameter to related interplay effects. Looking for local maximum and local minimum doses, some discrepancies were found, but their significance was presented for individual patients, not for the whole cohort. The same was observed for other verified dose metrics.

Conclusions

Generally, the evaluation of VMAT robustness between FF and FFF concepts against interplay effect showed a negligible effect of simulated motion influence on tumour coverage among different photon beam quality parameters. Due to the lack of FFF beams, smaller radiotherapy centres are able to perform ITV-based VMAT lung SBRT treatment in a safe way. Radiotherapy department having FFF beams could perform safe, fast and efficient ITV-based VMAT lung SBRT without a concern about significance of interplay effects.