1
|
Eggermont F, Mathijssen E, Bakker M, Tanck E. Using a statistical shape model to estimate the knee landmarks for aligning femurs for femoral finite element models. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2024; 255:108324. [PMID: 39024971 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The BOne Strength (BOS) score is a CT-based tool to assess fracture risk for patients with femoral bone metastases using finite element (FE) models. Until now, the knee joint center (KJC) and centers of the condyles (CoCs) were needed to create the FE model, hence BOS scores of incompletely scanned femurs could not be calculated. In this study, a statistical shape model (SSM) was used to align FE models of femurs with a removed knee anatomy. The aim was to determine the effect of using an SSM with different proximal femur fractions on KJC and CoC locations, and on the BOS score. METHODS QCT scans of 117 femurs were used to generate patient-specific FE models of the proximal femur. These models were aligned using the knee joint center (KJC), center of condyles (CoC) and femoral head center. The femurs were artificially shortened by removing 30 %, 50 % or 70 % of the femur. A recently developed SSM was used to reconstruct the distal femur. For each of the femur fractions, the difference between the original and SSM-reconstructed KJC and CoC were determined and the BOS scores were calculated. RESULTS Although the individual differences between the original and SSM-reconstructed KJC and CoC location could be large, the effect on the individual BOS scores was limited. The SSM-reconstructed BOS scores were highly correlated to the original BOS scores. CONCLUSION Using SSM to align femurs with a removed knee anatomy resulted in varying estimation of knee anatomy between patients but relatively accurate BOS scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florieke Eggermont
- Orthopaedic Research Lab, Department of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Ellis Mathijssen
- Orthopaedic Research Lab, Department of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Max Bakker
- Orthopaedic Research Lab, Department of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Tanck
- Orthopaedic Research Lab, Department of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tsukamoto S, Mavrogenis AF, Masunaga T, Aiba H, Aso A, Honoki K, Fujii H, Kido A, Tanaka Y, Tanaka Y, Errani C. Response rate specific to bone metastasis of various cancers for immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & TRAUMATOLOGY : ORTHOPEDIE TRAUMATOLOGIE 2024:10.1007/s00590-024-04018-1. [PMID: 38836904 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04018-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the prognosis of patients with cancer, such as melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and urothelial carcinoma. The extension of life expectancy has led to an increased incidence of bone metastases (BM) among patients with cancer. BM result in skeletal-related events, including severe pain, pathological fractures, and nerve palsy. Surgery is typically required for the treatment of BM in patients with an impending fracture; however, it may be avoided in those who respond to ICIs. We systematically reviewed studies analyzing BM responses to treatment with ICIs. METHODS This study was conducted in accordance with the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 statement and registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (ID: UMIN000053707). Studies reporting response rates based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDA) criteria specific for BM in patients treated with ICIs were included; reports of fewer than five cases and review articles were excluded. Studies involving humans, published in English and Japanese, were searched. The PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched. Ultimately, nine studies were analyzed. The Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies was used to assess the quality of studies. RESULTS Based on the MDA criteria, complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was observed in 44-78% and 62% patients treated with ICIs plus denosumab for NSCLC and melanoma, respectively. According to the RECIST, CR or PR was recorded in 5% and 7-28% of patients treated with ICIs for renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma, respectively. CONCLUSION Although response rates to ICIs for BM are poor, patients treated with ICI plus denosumab for bone metastases with impending fractures from NSCLC and melanoma are likely to avoid surgery to prevent fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinji Tsukamoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara-City, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
| | - Andreas F Mavrogenis
- First Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 41 Ventouri Street, 15562, Holargos, Athens, Greece
| | - Tomoya Masunaga
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara-City, Nara, 634-8521, Japan
| | - Hisaki Aiba
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University, 1 Azakawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Ayano Aso
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy
| | - Kanya Honoki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara-City, Nara, 634-8521, Japan
| | - Hiromasa Fujii
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara-City, Nara, 634-8521, Japan
| | - Akira Kido
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nara Medical University, 840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara-City, Nara, 634-8521, Japan
| | - Yuu Tanaka
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Wakayama Professional University of Rehabilitation, 3-1, Minamoto-cho, Wakayama-City, Wakayama, 640-8222, Japan
| | - Yasuhito Tanaka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara-City, Nara, 634-8521, Japan
| | - Costantino Errani
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burgess L, Nguyen E, Tseng CL, Guckenberger M, Lo SS, Zhang B, Nielsen M, Maralani P, Nguyen QN, Sahgal A. Practice and principles of stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100716. [PMID: 38226025 PMCID: PMC10788412 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is the dominant treatment modality for painful spine and non-spine bone metastases (NSBM). Historically, this was achieved with conventional low dose external beam radiotherapy, however, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly applied for these indications. Meta-analyses and randomized clinical trials have demonstrated improved pain response and more durable tumor control with SBRT for spine metastases. However, in the setting of NSBM, there is limited evidence supporting global adoption and large scale randomized clinical trials are in need. SBRT is technically demanding requiring careful consideration of organ at risk tolerance, and strict adherence to technical requirements including immobilization, simulation, contouring and image-guidance procedures. Additional considerations include follow up practices after SBRT, with appropriate imaging playing a critical role in response assessment. Finally, there is renewed research into promising new technologies that may further refine the use of SBRT in both spinal and NSBM in the years to come.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Burgess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Walker Family Cancer Centre, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simon S. Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Beibei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle Nielsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pejman Maralani
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Centre, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Amendola RL, Miller MA, Kaupp SM, Cleary RJ, Damron TA, Mann KA. Modification to Mirels scoring system location component improves fracture prediction for metastatic disease of the proximal femur. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:65. [PMID: 36694156 PMCID: PMC9872372 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06182-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Correctly identifying patients at risk of femoral fracture due to metastatic bone disease remains a clinical challenge. Mirels criteria remains the most widely referenced method with the advantage of being easily calculated but it suffers from poor specificity. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a modified Mirels scoring system through scoring modification of the original Mirels location component within the proximal femur. METHODS Computational (finite element) experiments were performed to quantify strength reduction in the proximal femur caused by simulated lytic lesions at defined locations. Virtual spherical defects representing lytic lesions were placed at 32 defined locations based on axial (4 axial positions: neck, intertrochanteric, subtrochanteric or diaphyseal) and circumferential (8 circumferential: 45-degree intervals) positions. Finite element meshes were created, material property assignment was based on CT mineral density, and femoral head/greater trochanter loading consistent with stair ascent was applied. The strength of each femur with a simulated lesion divided by the strength of the intact femur was used to calculate the Location-Based Strength Fraction (LBSF). A modified Mirels location score was next defined for each of the 32 lesion locations with an assignment of 1 (LBSF > 75%), 2 (LBSF: 51-75%), and 3 (LBSF: 0-50%). To test the new scoring system, data from 48 patients with metastatic disease to the femur, previously enrolled in a Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) cross-sectional study was used. The lesion location was identified for each case based on axial and circumferential location from the CT images and assigned an original (2 or 3) and modified (1,2, or 3) Mirels location score. The total score for each was then calculated. Eight patients had a fracture of the femur and 40 did not over a 4-month follow-up period. Logistic regression and decision curve analysis were used to explore relationships between clinical outcome (Fracture/No Fracture) and the two Mirels scoring methods. RESULTS The location-based strength fraction (LBSF) was lowest for lesions in the subtrochanteric and diaphyseal regions on the lateral side of the femur; lesions in these regions would be at greatest risk of fracture. Neck lesions located at the anterior and antero-medial positions were at the lowest risk of fracture. When grouped, neck lesions had the highest LBSF (83%), followed by intertrochanteric (72%), with subtrochanteric (50%) and diaphyseal lesions (49%) having the lowest LBSF. There was a significant difference (p < 0.0001) in LBSF between each axial location, except subtrochanteric and diaphyseal which were not different from each other (p = 0.96). The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve using logistic regression was greatest for modified Mirels Score using site specific location of the lesion (Modified Mirels-ss, AUC = 0.950), followed by a modified Mirels Score using axial location of lesion (Modified Mirels-ax, AUC = 0.941). Both were an improvement over the original Mirels score (AUC = 0.853). Decision curve analysis was used to quantify the relative risks of identifying patients that would fracture (TP, true positives) and those erroneously predicted to fracture (FP, false positives) for the original and modified Mirels scoring systems. The net benefit of the scoring system weighed the benefits (TP) and harms (FP) on the same scale. At a threshold probability of fracture of 10%, use of the modified Mirels scoring reduced the number of false positives by 17-20% compared to Mirels scoring. CONCLUSIONS A modified Mirels scoring system, informed by detailed analysis of the influence of lesion location, improved the ability to predict impending pathological fractures of the proximal femur for patients with metastatic bone disease. Decision curve analysis is a useful tool to weigh costs and benefits concerning fracture risk and could be combined with other patient/clinical factors that contribute to clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard L Amendola
- grid.411023.50000 0000 9159 4457 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
| | - Mark A Miller
- grid.411023.50000 0000 9159 4457 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
| | - Shannon M Kaupp
- grid.411023.50000 0000 9159 4457 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
| | - Richard J Cleary
- grid.423152.30000 0001 0686 270XDivision of Mathematics and Science, Babson College, 231 Forest St, Babson Park, MA 02457 USA
| | - Timothy A Damron
- grid.411023.50000 0000 9159 4457 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
| | - Kenneth A Mann
- grid.411023.50000 0000 9159 4457 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Eggermont F, van der Linden Y, Verdonschot N, Dierselhuis E, Ligthert S, Bitter T, Westhoff P, Tanck E. A Patient-Specific Fracture Risk Assessment Tool for Femoral Bone Metastases: Using the Bone Strength (BOS) Score in Clinical Practice. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235904. [PMID: 36497388 PMCID: PMC9740241 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with femoral metastases are at risk of fracturing bones. It is important to prevent fractures in order to maintain mobility and quality of life. The BOne Strength (BOS) score is based on a computed tomography (CT)-based patient-specific finite element (FE) computer model that objectively calculates bone strength. In this pilot study, the added clinical value of the BOS score towards treatment-related decision making was assessed. In December 2019, the BOS score was implemented in four radiotherapy centers. The BOS scores and fracture risks of individual patients were calculated and returned to the physician to assist in treatment decisions. The physicians filled out a questionnaire, which was qualitatively analyzed. A follow-up to identify fractures and/or death was performed after six months. Until June 2021, 42 BOS scores were delivered (20 high, 9 moderate, and 13 low fracture risk). In 48%, the BOS score led to an adaptation of treatment plans. Physicians indicated that the BOS score provided objective insight into fracture risk, was reassuring for physicians and patients, and improved multidisciplinary discussions and shared decision making. In conclusion, the BOS score is an objective tool to assess fracture risk in femoral bone metastases and aids physicians and patients in making a more informed decision regarding the most appropriate treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florieke Eggermont
- Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| | - Yvette van der Linden
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nico Verdonschot
- Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Laboratory of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Edwin Dierselhuis
- Department of Orthopedics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Steven Ligthert
- Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Thom Bitter
- Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paulien Westhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Tanck
- Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
ESTRO ACROP guidelines for external beam radiotherapy of patients with complicated bone metastases. Radiother Oncol 2022; 173:240-253. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
7
|
Ataei A, Eikhout J, van Leeuwen RGH, Tanck E, Eggermont F. The effect of variations in CT scan protocol on femoral finite element failure load assessment using phantomless calibration. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0265524. [PMID: 35303026 PMCID: PMC8932617 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, it was shown that fracture risk assessment in patients with femoral bone metastases using Finite Element (FE) modeling can be performed using a calibration phantom or air-fat-muscle calibration and that non-patient-specific calibration was less favorable. The purpose of this study was to investigate if phantomless calibration can be used instead of phantom calibration when different CT protocols are used. Differences in effect of CT protocols on Hounsfield units (HU), calculated bone mineral density (BMD) and FE failure loads between phantom and two methods of phantomless calibrations were studied. Five human cadaver lower limbs were scanned atop a calibration phantom according to a standard scanning protocol and seven additional commonly deviating protocols including current, peak kilovoltage (kVp), slice thickness, rotation time, field of view, reconstruction kernel, and reconstruction algorithm. The HUs of the scans were calibrated to BMD (in mg/cm3) using the calibration phantom as well as using air-fat-muscle and non-patient-specific calibration, resulting in three models for each scan. FE models were created, and failure loads were calculated by simulating an axial load on the femur. HU, calculated BMD and failure load of all protocols were compared between the three calibration methods. The different protocols showed little variation in HU, BMD and failure load. However, compared to phantom calibration, changing the kVp resulted in a relatively large decrease of approximately 10% in mean HU and BMD of the trabecular and cortical region of interest (ROI), resulting in a 13.8% and 13.4% lower failure load when air-fat-muscle and non-patient-specific calibrations were used, respectively. In conclusion, while we observed significant correlations between air-fat-muscle calibration and phantom calibration as well as between non-patient-specific calibration and phantom calibration, our sample size was too small to prove that either of these calibration approaches was superior. Further studies are necessary to test whether air-fat-muscle or non-patient-specific calibration could replace phantom calibration in case of different scanning protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Ataei
- Orthopaedic Research Lab, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Jelle Eikhout
- Orthopaedic Research Lab, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud G. H. van Leeuwen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Tanck
- Orthopaedic Research Lab, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Florieke Eggermont
- Orthopaedic Research Lab, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A Tailored Approach for Appendicular Impending and Pathologic Fractures in Solid Cancer Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14040893. [PMID: 35205641 PMCID: PMC8870648 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14040893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Patients with bone metastases often suffer with complications, such as bone fractures, which have a substantial negative impact on clinical outcomes. To optimize clinical results, a tailored approach should be defined for managing impending or pathologic fractures in each individual case. The ability to control systemic disease, the extent, location and nature of bone metastases, and the biology of the underlying tumor, are the main factors that will define the strategy to follow. Abstract Advances in medical and surgical treatment have played a major role in increasing the survival rates of cancer patients with metastatic bone disease. The clinical course of patients with bone metastases is often impaired by bone complications, such as bone fractures, which have a substantial negative impact on clinical outcomes. To optimize clinical results and prevent a detrimental impact on patients’ health, a tailored approach should be defined for any given patient. The optimal management of impending or pathologic fractures is unknown and relies on a multidisciplinary approach to tailor clinical decisions to each individual patient. The ability to control systemic disease, the extent, location and nature of bone metastases, and the biology of the underlying tumor, are the main factors that will define the strategy to follow. The present review covers the most recent data regarding impending and pathologic fractures in patients with bone metastases, and discusses the medical and surgical management of patients presenting with metastatic bone disease in different clinical settings.
Collapse
|
9
|
Confavreux CB, Follet H, Mitton D, Pialat JB, Clézardin P. Fracture Risk Evaluation of Bone Metastases: A Burning Issue. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13225711. [PMID: 34830865 PMCID: PMC8616502 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Major progress has been achieved to treat cancer patients and survival has improved considerably, even for stage-IV bone metastatic patients. Locomotive health has become a crucial issue for patient autonomy and quality of life. The centerpiece of the reflection lies in the fracture risk evaluation of bone metastasis to guide physician decision regarding physical activity, antiresorptive agent prescription, and local intervention by radiotherapy, surgery, and interventional radiology. A key mandatory step, since bone metastases may be asymptomatic and disseminated throughout the skeleton, is to identify the bone metastasis location by cartography, especially within weight-bearing bones. For every location, the fracture risk evaluation relies on qualitative approaches using imagery and scores such as Mirels and spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS). This approach, however, has important limitations and there is a need to develop new tools for bone metastatic and myeloma fracture risk evaluation. Personalized numerical simulation qCT-based imaging constitutes one of these emerging tools to assess bone tumoral strength and estimate the femoral and vertebral fracture risk. The next generation of numerical simulation and artificial intelligence will take into account multiple loadings to integrate movement and obtain conditions even closer to real-life, in order to guide patient rehabilitation and activity within a personalized-medicine approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyrille B. Confavreux
- Centre Expert des Métastases Osseuses (CEMOS), Département de Rhumatologie, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69310 Pierre Bénite, France
- Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France; (H.F.); (J.B.P.); (P.C.)
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale INSERM, LYOS UMR1033, 69008 Lyon, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Helene Follet
- Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France; (H.F.); (J.B.P.); (P.C.)
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale INSERM, LYOS UMR1033, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - David Mitton
- Université de Lyon, Université Gustave Eiffel, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, LBMC, UMR_T 9406, 69622 Lyon, France;
| | - Jean Baptiste Pialat
- Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France; (H.F.); (J.B.P.); (P.C.)
- CREATIS, CNRS UMR 5220, INSERM U1294, INSA Lyon, Université Jean Monnet Saint-Etienne, 42000 Saint-Etienne, France
- Service de Radiologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69310 Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Philippe Clézardin
- Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France; (H.F.); (J.B.P.); (P.C.)
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale INSERM, LYOS UMR1033, 69008 Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lopez-Campos F, Cacicedo J, Couñago F, García R, Leaman-Alcibar O, Navarro-Martin A, Pérez-Montero H, Conde-Moreno A. SEOR SBRT-SG stereotactic body radiation therapy consensus guidelines for non-spine bone metastasis. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 24:215-226. [PMID: 34633602 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02695-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to treat non-spine bone metastases (NSBM) is becoming increasingly common in clinical practice. The clinical advantages of SBRT include good pain control and high local control rates, although only limited data are available. The Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) SBRT group recently convened a task force of experts in the field to address key questions related to SBRT for NSBM, including treatment indications, planning, techniques, and dose fractionation. The task force reviewed the available literature to develop evidence-based recommendations for the safe application of NSBM SBRT and to standardize and optimize SBRT processes. The present document provides a comprehensive analysis of the available data, including ongoing clinical trials and controversies, providing clinically applicable recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Lopez-Campos
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
| | - J Cacicedo
- Radiation Oncology Department, Osakidetza/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Barakaldo, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Radiology and Physical Medicine of the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Vizcaya, Spain
| | - F Couñago
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Quirón Salud, Hospital La Luz, Madrid, Universidad Europea de Madrid (UEM), Madrid, Spain
| | - R García
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Ruber Internacional Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - O Leaman-Alcibar
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Navarro-Martin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - H Pérez-Montero
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Conde-Moreno
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, CEU Cardenal Herrera University, Castellón, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fracture Risk of Long Bone Metastases: A Review of Current and New Decision-Making Tools for Prophylactic Surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153662. [PMID: 34359563 PMCID: PMC8345078 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Long bone metastases are frequently a pivotal point in the oncological history of patients. Weakening of the bone results in pathologic fractures that not only compromise patient function but also their survival. Therefore, the main issue for tumor boards remains timely assessment of the risk of fracture, as this is a key consideration in providing preventive surgery while also avoiding overtreatment. As the Mirels scoring system takes into account both the radiological and the clinical criteria, it has been used worldwide since the 1990s. However, due to increasing concern regarding the lack of accuracy, new thresholds have been defined for the identification of impending fractures that require prophylactic surgery, on the basis of axial cortical involvement and biomechanical models involving quantitative computed tomography. The aim of this review is to establish a state-of-the-art of the risk assessment of long bone metastases fractures, from simple radiologic scores to more complex multidimensional bone models, in order to define new decision-making tools. Abstract Long bone pathological fractures very much reflect bone metastases morbidity in many types of cancer. Bearing in mind that they not only compromise patient function but also survival, identifying impending fractures before the actual event is one of the main concerns for tumor boards. Indeed, timely prophylactic surgery has been demonstrated to increase patient quality of life as well as survival. However, early surgery for long bone metastases remains controversial as the current fracture risk assessment tools lack accuracy. This review first focuses on the gold standard Mirels rating system. It then explores other unique imaging thresholds such as axial or circumferential cortical involvement and the merits of nuclear imaging tools. To overcome the lack of specificity, other fracture prediction strategies have focused on biomechanical models based on quantitative computed tomography (CT): computed tomography rigidity analysis (CT-RA) and finite element analysis (CT-FEA). Despite their higher specificities in impending fracture assessment, their limited availability, along with a need for standardization, have limited their use in everyday practice. Currently, the prediction of long bone pathologic fractures is a multifactorial process. In this regard, machine learning could potentially be of value by taking into account clinical survival prediction as well as clinical and improved CT-RA/FEA data.
Collapse
|