1
|
Chen K, Li S, Chen M, Jin Z, Sun X, Zhou S, Yang H. Endostar acts as a pneumonitis protectant in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:257. [PMID: 38395838 PMCID: PMC10893751 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12001-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND CCRT is presently the standard treatment for LA-NSCLC. RP is one of the main obstacles to the completion of thoracic radiation therapy, resulting in limited survival benefits in NSCLC patients. This research aims to explore the role of Endostar in the occurrence of grade≥2 RP and clinical curative effect in LA-NSCLC patients. METHODS This study retrospectively analyzed 122 patients with stage III NSCLC who received CCRT from December 2008 to December 2017, or Endostar intravenous drip concurrently with chemoradiotherapy (Endostar + CCRT group). Standard toxicity of the pneumonitis endpoint was also collected by CTCAE V5.0. We further summarized other available studies on the role of Endostar in the prognosis of NSCLC patients and the incidence of RP. RESULTS There were 76 cases in the CCRT group and 46 cases in the CCRT+ Endostar group. In the CCRT+ Endostar group, the occurrence of grade ≥2 RP in patients with V20Gy ≥25% was significantly higher than that in patients with V20Gy < 25% (p = 0.001). In the cohorts with V20Gy < 25%, 0 cases of 29 patients treated with Endostar developed grade ≥2 RP was lower than in the CCRT group (p = 0.026). The re-analysis of data from other available studies indicated that Endostar plus CCRT could be more efficient and safely in the occurrence of grade≥2 RP with LA-NSCLC. CONCLUSIONS When receiving CCRT for LA-NSCLC patients, simultaneous combination of Endostar is recommended to enhance clinical benefit and reduce pulmonary toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuifei Chen
- Taizhou hospital of Zhejiang Province, Shaoxing University, Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, 317000, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Taizhou, Radiation Oncology Institute of Enze Medical Health Academy, Taizhou Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, 317000, China
| | - Shuling Li
- Taizhou hospital of Zhejiang Province, Shaoxing University, Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, 317000, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Taizhou, Radiation Oncology Institute of Enze Medical Health Academy, Taizhou Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, 317000, China
| | - Meng Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Taizhou, Radiation Oncology Institute of Enze Medical Health Academy, Taizhou Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, 317000, China
| | - Zhicheng Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Taizhou, Radiation Oncology Institute of Enze Medical Health Academy, Taizhou Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, 317000, China
| | - Xuefeng Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Taizhou, Radiation Oncology Institute of Enze Medical Health Academy, Taizhou Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, 317000, China
| | - Suna Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Taizhou, Radiation Oncology Institute of Enze Medical Health Academy, Taizhou Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, 317000, China.
| | - Haihua Yang
- Taizhou hospital of Zhejiang Province, Shaoxing University, Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, 317000, China.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Taizhou, Radiation Oncology Institute of Enze Medical Health Academy, Taizhou Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, 317000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ohri N, Jolly S, Cooper BT, Kabarriti R, Bodner WR, Klein J, Guha C, Viswanathan S, Shum E, Sabari JK, Cheng H, Gucalp RA, Castellucci E, Qin A, Gadgeel SM, Halmos B. Selective Personalized RadioImmunotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Trial (SPRINT). J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:562-570. [PMID: 37988638 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Standard therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant durvalumab. For biomarker-selected patients with LA-NSCLC, we hypothesized that sequential pembrolizumab and risk-adapted radiotherapy, without chemotherapy, would be well-tolerated and effective. METHODS Patients with stage III NSCLC or unresectable stage II NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were eligible for this trial. Patients with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥50% received three cycles of induction pembrolizumab (200 mg, once every 21 days), followed by a 20-fraction course of risk-adapted thoracic radiotherapy (55 Gy delivered to tumors or lymph nodes with metabolic volume exceeding 20 cc, 48 Gy delivered to smaller lesions), followed by consolidation pembrolizumab to complete a 1-year treatment course. The primary study end point was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included response rates after induction pembrolizumab, overall survival (OS), and adverse events. RESULTS Twenty-five patients with a PD-L1 TPS of ≥50% were enrolled. The median age was 71, most patients (88%) had stage IIIA or IIIB disease, and the median PD-L1 TPS was 75%. Two patients developed disease progression during induction pembrolizumab, and two patients discontinued pembrolizumab after one infusion because of immune-related adverse events. Using RECIST criteria, 12 patients (48%) exhibited a partial or complete response after induction pembrolizumab. Twenty-four patients (96%) received definitive thoracic radiotherapy. The 1-year PFS rate is 76%, satisfying our efficacy objective. One- and 2-year OS rates are 92% and 76%, respectively. The most common grade 3 adverse events were colitis (n = 2, 8%) and esophagitis (n = 2, 8%), and no higher-grade treatment-related adverse events have occurred. CONCLUSION Pembrolizumab and risk-adapted radiotherapy, without chemotherapy, are a promising treatment approach for patients with LA-NSCLC with a PD-L1 TPS of ≥50%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitin Ohri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Shruti Jolly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Benjamin T Cooper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Rafi Kabarriti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
| | - William R Bodner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Jonathan Klein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Chandan Guha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Shankar Viswanathan
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Elaine Shum
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Joshua K Sabari
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Haiying Cheng
- Department of Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Rasim A Gucalp
- Department of Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Enrico Castellucci
- Department of Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Angel Qin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Shirish M Gadgeel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | - Balazs Halmos
- Department of Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pennock M, Halmos B, Bodner W, Cheng H, Gucalp R, Ohri N. Exploring causes and consequences of early discontinuation of durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 41:100643. [PMID: 37346274 PMCID: PMC10279777 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction For most locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) patients who complete definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and do not experience disease progression, one year of adjuvant durvalumab is recommended. Here, we explore causes and consequences of early durvalumab discontinuation. Materials and Methods We reviewed patients treated for LA-NSCLC with definitive CRT who began adjuvant durvalumab between 2017 and 2021. Duration of durvalumab receipt and causes for early discontinuation were tabulated. Logistic regression models were utilized to evaluate predictors of early durvalumab discontinuation. Landmark analyses were performed to explore associations between early durvalumab discontinuation and clinical outcomes (progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS)). Results Fifty-nine patients were included. Forty-one patients (69%) discontinued durvalumab early, most commonly for disease progression (n = 14) or lung toxicity (n = 10). Multivariable analysis revealed mean heart radiotherapy dose (MHD) was associated with risk of durvalumab discontinuation from progression (HR = 2.34 per 10 Gy, p = 0.052), and there was a trend suggesting an association between MHD and risk of durvalumab discontinuation from lung toxicity (HR = 2.16 per 10 Gy, p = 0.126). Median PFS duration following durvalumab initiation was 14 months, and median OS duration was 32 months. Landmark analyses that excluded patients with progression or death within one year of durvalumab initiation demonstrated improved outcomes for patients who completed one year of durvalumab (2-year PFS 100% v. 40%, p < 0.001; 2-year OS 100% v. 67%, p = 0.862). Improved outcomes were observed for patients who received MHD below the cohort median (9.3 Gy) compared to patients with higher MHD (median PFS 32 months v. 8 months, p < 0.001; 2-year OS 69% v. 44%, p = 0.088). Conclusion For LA-NSCLC patients treated with CRT followed by immunotherapy, extent of cardiac irradiation may be a risk factor for immunotherapy discontinuation, disease recurrence, and death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Pennock
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1625 Poplar Street, Suite 101, Bronx, NY 10461, United States
| | - Balazs Halmos
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Oncology, 1695 Eastchester Road, Bronx, NY 10461-2374, United States
| | - William Bodner
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1625 Poplar Street, Suite 101, Bronx, NY 10461, United States
| | - Haiying Cheng
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Oncology, 1695 Eastchester Road, Bronx, NY 10461-2374, United States
| | - Rasim Gucalp
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Oncology, 1695 Eastchester Road, Bronx, NY 10461-2374, United States
| | - Nitin Ohri
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1625 Poplar Street, Suite 101, Bronx, NY 10461, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oh S, Botros GN, Patel M, Haigentz M, Patel E, Kontopidis I, Langenfeld J, Deek MP, Jabbour SK. Locally Advanced Lung Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2023; 37:533-555. [PMID: 37024391 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
Consolidation immunotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation has improved five-year survival rates in unresectable, locally advanced lung cancer, but disease progression and treatment personalization remain challenges. New treatment approaches with concurrent immunotherapy and consolidative novel agents are being investigated and show promising efficacy data, but at the risk of additive toxicity. Patients with PD-L1 negative tumors, oncogenic driver mutations, intolerable toxicity, or limited performance status continue to require innovative therapies. This review summarizes historical data that galvanized new research efforts, as well as ongoing clinical trials that address the challenges of current therapeutic approaches for unresectable, locally advanced lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - George N Botros
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Milan Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Missak Haigentz
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Eshan Patel
- Division of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Iaonnis Kontopidis
- Department of Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - John Langenfeld
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Matthew P Deek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yegya-Raman N, Friedes C, Sun L, Iocolano M, Kim KN, Doucette A, Cohen RB, Robinson KW, Levin WP, Cengel KA, Lally B, Agarwal M, D'Avella CA, Marmarelis ME, Kosteva JA, Singh AP, Ciunci CA, Aggarwal C, Berman AT, Langer CJ, Feigenberg SJ. Utilization and factors precluding receipt of checkpoint inhibitor consolidation for stage III NSCLC in a large U.S. academic health system. Clin Lung Cancer 2023:S1525-7304(23)00054-2. [PMID: 37076396 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2023.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to determine the proportion of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who initiate consolidation durvalumab or other immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT), as well as reasons for nonreceipt and prognostic implications. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively identified consecutive patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with definitive cCRT between October 2017 and December 2021 within a large US academic health system. Patients either received consolidation ICIs (ICI group) or did not (no-ICI group). Baseline characteristics and overall survival (OS) of the groups were assessed. Factors predictive of ICI nonreceipt were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS Of 333 patients who completed cCRT, 229 (69%) initiated consolidation ICIs; 104 (31%) did not. Reasons for ICI nonreceipt included progressive disease post-cCRT (N = 31, 9%), comorbidity or intercurrent illness (N = 25, 8%), cCRT toxicity (N = 23, 7%; 19/23 pneumonitis), and EGFR/ALK alteration (N = 14, 4%). The no-ICI group had worse performance status and a higher rate of baseline pulmonary comorbidity. Larger planning target volume was associated with post-cCRT progressive disease, and higher lung radiation dose with cCRT toxicity. Median OS was 16 months in the no-ICI group and 34.4 months in the ICI group. In the no-ICI group, OS was superior among those with EGFR/ALK alterations (median 44.5 months) and worst among those with progressive disease (median 5.9 months, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION 31% of patients who completed cCRT for stage III NSCLC did not receive consolidation ICIs. Survival amongst these patients is poor, especially for those with progressive disease post-cCRT.
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhou S, Meng Y, Sun X, Jin Z, Feng W, Yang H. The critical components for effective adaptive radiotherapy in patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: who, when and how. Future Oncol 2022; 18:3551-3562. [PMID: 36189758 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is a new radiotherapy technology based on image-guided radiation therapy technology, used to avoid radiation overexposure to residual tumors and the surrounding normal tissues. Tumors undergoing the same radiation doses and modes can occur unequal shrinkage due to the variation of response times to radiation doses in different patients. To perform ART effectively, eligible patients with a high probability of benefits from ART need to be identified. Confirming the precise timetable for ART in every patient is another urgent problem to be resolved. Moreover, the outcomes of ART are different depending on the various image guidance used. This review discusses 'who, when and how' as the three key factors involved in the most effective implementation for the management of ART.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suna Zhou
- Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Taizhou Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 317000, Zhejiang, PR China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Xi'an No.3 Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi'an, Shanxi, 710018, PR China
| | - Yinnan Meng
- Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Taizhou Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 317000, Zhejiang, PR China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Taizhou Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 317000, Zhejiang, PR China
| | - Xuefeng Sun
- Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Taizhou Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 317000, Zhejiang, PR China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Taizhou Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 317000, Zhejiang, PR China
| | - Zhicheng Jin
- Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Taizhou Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 317000, Zhejiang, PR China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Taizhou Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 317000, Zhejiang, PR China
| | - Wei Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, 310022, PR China
| | - Haihua Yang
- Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Taizhou Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 317000, Zhejiang, PR China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Taizhou Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 317000, Zhejiang, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jabbour SK, Cho BC, Bria E, Kato T, Bhosle J, Gainor JF, Reguart N, Wang L, Morgensztern D, Shentu Y, Kim SJ, Souza F, Reck M. Rationale and Design of the Phase III KEYLYNK-012 Study of Pembrolizumab and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Pembrolizumab With or Without Olaparib for Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2022; 23:e342-e346. [PMID: 35618629 PMCID: PMC10865425 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is a standard therapy for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Durvalumab is an approved treatment option following concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the absence of disease progression. The multicenter, phase III, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind KEYLYNK-012 study evaluates whether initiation of immunotherapy with pembrolizumab concurrently with chemoradiotherapy, followed by post-chemoradiotherapy pembrolizumab with or without olaparib improves outcomes for participants with stage III NSCLC. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04380636) METHODS: Eligible participants are aged ≥18 years with previously untreated, pathologically confirmed, stages IIIA-C, squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC not suitable for surgery with curative intent. Participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to platinum-doublet chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with pembrolizumab (Groups A and B) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone (Group C) for 3 cycles. In the absence of disease progression, participants will receive pembrolizumab plus olaparib placebo (Group A), pembrolizumab plus olaparib (Group B), or durvalumab monotherapy (Group C). Dual primary endpoints are progression-free survival per RECIST version 1.1 by independent central review and overall survival. RESULTS Enrollment began on July 6, 2020, and is ongoing at approximately 190 sites. CONCLUSION KEYLYNK-012 will provide important information on the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy and subsequent pembrolizumab with or without olaparib in participants with unresectable stage III NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma K Jabbour
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
| | - Byoung Chul Cho
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Emilio Bria
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | | | | | - Justin F Gainor
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Luhua Wang
- Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | | | | | | | | | - Martin Reck
- Lung Clinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jabbour SK, Keller SM, Reck M. Analysis of Outcomes With Addition of Immunotherapy to Chemoradiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-Reply. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:168-169. [PMID: 34734971 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick
| | | | - Martin Reck
- LungenClinic, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yu Y, Zakeri K, Lee N. Javelin Head Neck 100: Should we combine immunotherapy with radiation therapy? Oncotarget 2021; 12:2223-2226. [PMID: 34676054 PMCID: PMC8522846 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
10
|
Dohopolski M, Gottumukkala S, Gomez D, Iyengar P. Radiation Therapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2021; 11:a037713. [PMID: 34127511 PMCID: PMC8485739 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a037713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The management of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) varies according to stage. Surgical resection is reserved for operable patients with early-stage NSCLC, while high-dose target radiation-stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)-is reserved for patients whose comorbidities prohibit them from a major surgical procedure. The treatment of locally advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC) is stratified according to resectability. Those with resectable disease may require additional treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation, while patients with unresectable disease will require definitive chemoradiation therapy with adjuvant durvalumab. Patients with limited metastatic disease benefit from the combination of SBRT and systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Dohopolski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Sujana Gottumukkala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Puneeth Iyengar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Taugner J, Käsmann L, Karin M, Eze C, Flörsch B, Guggenberger J, Li M, Tufman A, Reinmuth N, Duell T, Belka C, Manapov F. Planning target volume as a predictor of disease progression in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy and concurrent and/or sequential immune checkpoint inhibition. Invest New Drugs 2021; 40:163-171. [PMID: 34351518 PMCID: PMC8763767 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-021-01143-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Background. The present study evaluates outcome after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with concurrent and/or sequential Programmed Cell Death 1 (PD-1) or Ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibition (CPI) for inoperable stage III NSCLC patients depending on planning target volume (PTV). Method and patients. Prospective data of thirty-three consecutive patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC treated with CRT and sequential durvalumab (67%, 22 patients) or concurrent and sequential nivolumab (33%, 11 patients) were analyzed. Different PTV cut offs and PTV as a continuous variable were evaluated for their association with progression-free (PFS), local–regional progression-free (LRPFS), extracranial distant metastasis-free (eMFS) and brain-metastasis free-survival (BMFS). Results. All patients were treated with conventionally fractionated thoracic radiotherapy (TRT); 93% to a total dose of at least 60 Gy, 97% of patients received two cycles of concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 19.9 (range: 6.0–42.4) months; median overall survival (OS), LRFS, BMFS and eMFS were not reached. Median PFS was 22.8 (95% CI: 10.7–34.8) months. Patients with PTV ≥ 900ccm had a significantly shorter PFS (6.9 vs 22.8 months, p = 0.020) and eMFS (8.1 months vs. not reached, p = 0.003). Furthermore, patients with PTV ≥ 900ccm and stage IIIC disease (UICC-TNM Classification 8th Edition) achieved a very poor outcome with a median PFS and eMFS of 3.6 vs 22.8 months (p < 0.001) and 3.6 months vs. not reached (p = 0.001), respectively. PTV as a continuous variable also had a significant impact on eMFS (p = 0.048). However, no significant association of different PTV cut-offs or PTV as a continuous variable with LRPFS and BMFS could be shown. The multivariate analysis that was performed for PTV ≥ 900ccm and age (≥ 65 years), gender (male), histology (non-ACC) as well as T- and N-stage (T4, N3) as covariates also revealed PTV ≥ 900ccm as the only factor that had a significant correlation with PFS (HR: 5.383 (95% CI:1.263–22.942, p = 0.023)). Conclusion. In this prospective analysis of inoperable stage III NSCLC patients treated with definitive CRT combined with concurrent and/or sequential CPI, significantly shorter PFS and eMFS were observed in patients with initial PTV ≥ 900ccm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Taugner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lukas Käsmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. .,Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Munich, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Monika Karin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt Flörsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julian Guggenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Amanda Tufman
- Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Munich, Germany.,Division of Respiratory Medicine and Thoracic Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine V, Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Niels Reinmuth
- Asklepios Kliniken GmbH, Asklepios Fachkliniken Muenchen, Gauting, Germany
| | - Thomas Duell
- Asklepios Kliniken GmbH, Asklepios Fachkliniken Muenchen, Gauting, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Farkhad Manapov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ronden MI, Bahce I, Claessens NJ, Barlo N, Dahele MR, Daniels JM, Tissing-Tan C, Hekma E, Hashemi SM, van der Wel A, Spoelstra FO, Verbakel WFR, Tiemessen MA, van Laren M, Becker A, Tarasevych S, Haasbeek CJ, Maassen van den Brink K, Dickhoff C, Senan S. The Impact of the Availability of Immunotherapy on Patterns of Care in Stage III NSCLC: A Dutch Multicenter Analysis. JTO Clin Res Rep 2021; 2:100195. [PMID: 34590040 PMCID: PMC8474425 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment patterns in stage III NSCLC can vary considerably between countries. The PACIFIC trial reported improvements in progression-free and overall survival with adjuvant durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). We studied treatment decision-making by three Dutch regional thoracic multidisciplinary tumor boards between 2015 and 2019, to identify changes in practice when adjuvant durvalumab became available. METHODS Details of patients presenting with stage III NSCLC were retrospectively collected. Both CCRT and multimodality schemes incorporating planned surgery were defined as being radical-intent treatment (RIT). RESULTS Of 855 eligible patients, most (95%) were discussed at a thoracic multidisciplinary tumor board, which recommended a RIT in 63% (n = 510). Only 52% (n = 424) of the patients finally received a RIT. Predictors for not recommending RIT were age greater than or equal to 70 years, WHO performance score greater than or equal to 2, Charlson comorbidity index greater than or equal to 2 (excluding age), forced expiratory volume in 1 second less than 80% of predicted value, N3 disease, and period of diagnosis. Between 2015 to 2017 and 2018 to 2019, the proportion of patients undergoing CCRT increased from 34% to 42% (p = 0.02) and use of sequential chemoradiotherapy declined (21%-16%, p = 0.05). Rates of early toxicity and 1-year mortality were comparable for both periods. After 2018, 57% of the patients who underwent CCRT (90 of 159) received adjuvant durvalumab. CONCLUSIONS After publication of the PACIFIC trial, a significant increase was observed in the use of CCRT for patients with stage III NSCLC with rates of early toxicity and mortality being unchanged. Since 2018, 57% of the patients undergoing CCRT went on to receive adjuvant durvalumab. Nevertheless, approximately half of the patients were still considered unfit for a RIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merle I. Ronden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pulmonology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Idris Bahce
- Department of Pulmonology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Nicole Barlo
- Department of Pulmonology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
| | - Max R. Dahele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Edo Hekma
- Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Ziekenhuis, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Marian A. Tiemessen
- Department of Pulmonology, Dijklander Ziekenhuis, Hoorn & Purmerend, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein van Laren
- Department of Pulmonology, Dijklander Ziekenhuis, Hoorn & Purmerend, the Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Becker
- Department of Pulmonology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Chris Dickhoff
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Suresh Senan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Taugner J, Käsmann L, Eze C, Tufman A, Reinmuth N, Duell T, Belka C, Manapov F. Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy for PD-L1 Expressing Inoperable Stage III NSCLC Leads to Significant Improvement of Local-Regional Control and Overall Survival in the Real-World Setting. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13071613. [PMID: 33807324 PMCID: PMC8037429 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2020] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by maintenance treatment with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab is a new standard of care for inoperable stage III NSCLC. The present study compares the oncological outcome of patients treated with CRT to those treated with CRT and durvalumab (CRT-IO) in the real-world setting. The analysis was performed based on the retro- and prospectively collected data of 144 consecutive inoperable stage III NSCLC patients treated between 2011-2020. Local-regional-progression-free-survival (LRPFS-defined as progression in the mediastinum, hilum and/or supraclavicular region at both sites and the involved lung), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated from the last day of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT). Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 33.1 months (range: 6.3-111.8) and median overall survival was 27.2 (95% CI: 19.5-34.9) months. In the CRT-IO cohort after a median follow-up of 20.9 (range: 6.3-27.4) months, median PFS was not reached, LRPFS (p = 0.002), PFS (p = 0.018), and OS (p = 0.005) were significantly improved vs. the historical cohort of conventional CRT patients. After propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis with age, gender, histology, tumor volume, and treatment mode, and exact matching for T-and N-stage, 22 CRT-IO patients were matched 1:2 to 44 CRT patients. Twelve-month LRPFS, PFS, and OS rates in the CRT-IO vs. CRT cohort were 78.9 vs. 45.5% (p = 0.002), 60.0 vs. 31.8% (p = 0.007), and 100 vs. 70.5% (p = 0.003), respectively. This real-world analysis demonstrated that durvalumab after CRT led to significant improvement of local-regional control, PFS, and OS in PD-L1 expressing inoperable stage III NSCLC patients compared to a historical cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Taugner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.T.); (C.E.); (C.B.); (F.M.)
| | - Lukas Käsmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.T.); (C.E.); (C.B.); (F.M.)
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Center for Lung Research (DZL), 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-894-4007-4511
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.T.); (C.E.); (C.B.); (F.M.)
| | - Amanda Tufman
- Division of Respiratory Medicine and Thoracic Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine V, Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Niels Reinmuth
- Asklepios Kliniken GmbH, Asklepios Fachkliniken Muenchen, 82131 Gauting, Germany; (N.R.); (T.D.)
| | - Thomas Duell
- Asklepios Kliniken GmbH, Asklepios Fachkliniken Muenchen, 82131 Gauting, Germany; (N.R.); (T.D.)
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.T.); (C.E.); (C.B.); (F.M.)
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Center for Lung Research (DZL), 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Farkhad Manapov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.T.); (C.E.); (C.B.); (F.M.)
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Center for Lung Research (DZL), 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mir NA, Hull O, Bothwell S, Das D. Guideline Concordance With Durvalumab in Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single Center Veterans Hospital Experience. Fed Pract 2021; 38:74-78. [PMID: 33716483 DOI: 10.12788/fp.0056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Background Durvalumab is recommended by national guidelines for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Nonadherence to guidelines is associated with adverse outcomes. We studied the adherence and identified barriers to durvalumab usage at the Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) Oncology Clinic in Alabama. Methods Using retrospective analysis, we assessed the use of consolidative durvalumab among veterans at Birmingham VAMC. The health records of all veterans with stage III unresectable NSCLC from October 2017 to August 2019 were reviewed. Data collected included demographics, barriers to CRT initiation and completion, durvalumab usage, and reasons for not prescribing durvalumab. Results In our data review, 34 patients were found to have stage III unresectable NSCLC. Twenty (58.8%) of those 34 initiated CRT, but only 16 (47.1%) completed CRT treatment and 7 (20.6%) underwent further treatment with durvalumab. Of the 14 patients who did not initiate CRT, the most common reasons were poor performance status and/or the presence of comorbidities. Of the evaluable cohort of 34, 11 (32.4%) patients with stage III NSCLC received durvalumab. Of the 9 eligible patients who did not receive durvalumab, the most common reasons cited were toxicities experienced during or following CRT (11.8%). Conclusions Just one-third of patients were eligible to receive durvalumab at Birmingham VAMC. This was likely due to the difference between clinical trial and real-world patient populations. Interventions to address socioeconomic and system level barriers to improve our center's delivery of lung cancer treatment are planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabiel A Mir
- is a Clinical Nurse Educator, and is the Section Chief of Oncology, both at Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Alabama. was an Internal Medicine Resident in the Department of Medicine at the time the article was written; is a Fellow in the Division of Hematology and Oncology, and Devika Das is Clinical Assistant Professor of Hematology and Oncology, all at University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Olivia Hull
- is a Clinical Nurse Educator, and is the Section Chief of Oncology, both at Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Alabama. was an Internal Medicine Resident in the Department of Medicine at the time the article was written; is a Fellow in the Division of Hematology and Oncology, and Devika Das is Clinical Assistant Professor of Hematology and Oncology, all at University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Sheneka Bothwell
- is a Clinical Nurse Educator, and is the Section Chief of Oncology, both at Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Alabama. was an Internal Medicine Resident in the Department of Medicine at the time the article was written; is a Fellow in the Division of Hematology and Oncology, and Devika Das is Clinical Assistant Professor of Hematology and Oncology, all at University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Devika Das
- is a Clinical Nurse Educator, and is the Section Chief of Oncology, both at Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Alabama. was an Internal Medicine Resident in the Department of Medicine at the time the article was written; is a Fellow in the Division of Hematology and Oncology, and Devika Das is Clinical Assistant Professor of Hematology and Oncology, all at University of Alabama at Birmingham
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Taugner J, Käsmann L, Eze C, Rühle A, Tufman A, Reinmuth N, Duell T, Belka C, Manapov F. Real-world prospective analysis of treatment patterns in durvalumab maintenance after chemoradiotherapy in unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC patients. Invest New Drugs 2021; 39:1189-1196. [PMID: 33704621 PMCID: PMC8280025 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-021-01091-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the clinical use and real-world efficacy of durvalumab maintenance treatment after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in unresectable stage, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). All consecutive patients with unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 expression (≥1%) treated after October 2018 were included. Regular follow up, including physical examination, PET/CT and/or contrast-enhanced CT-Thorax/Abdomen were performed every three months after CRT. Descriptive treatment pattern analyses, including reasons of discontinuation and salvage treatment, were undertaken. Statistics were calculated from the last day of thoracic irradiation (TRT). Twenty-six patients were included. Median follow up achieved 20.6 months (range: 1.9–30.6). Durvalumab was initiated after a median of 25 (range: 13–103) days after completion of CRT. In median 14 (range: 2–24) cycles of durvalumab were applied within 6.4 (range 1–12.7) months. Six patients (23%) are still in treatment and seven (27%) have completed treatment with 24 cycles. Maintenance treatment was discontinued in 13 (50%) patients: 4 (15%) patients developed grade 3 pneumonitis according to CTCAE v5 after a median of 3.9 (range: 0.5–11.6) months and 7 (range: 2–17) cycles of durvalumab. Four (15%) patients developed grade 2 skin toxicity. One (4%) patient has discontinued treatment due to incompliance. Six and 12- month progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 82% and 62%, median PFS was not reached. No case of hyperprogression was documented. Eight (31%) patients have relapsed during maintenance treatment after a median of 4.8 (range: 2.2–11.3) months and 11 (range: 6–17) durvalumab cycles. Two patients (9%) developed a local-regional recurrence after 14 and 17 cycles of durvalumab. Extracranial distant metastases and brain metastases as first site of failure were detected in 4 (15%) and 2 (8%) patients, respectively. Three (13%) patients presented with symptomatic relapse. Our prospective study confirmed a favourable safety profile of durvalumab maintenance treatment after completion of CRT in unresectable stage, locally advanced NSCLC in a real-world setting. In a median follow-up time of 20.6 months, durvalumab was discontinued in 27% of all patients due to progressive disease. All patients with progressive disease were eligible for second-line treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Taugner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Lukas Käsmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. .,Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany.
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amanda Tufman
- Division of Respiratory Medicine and Thoracic Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine V, Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Niels Reinmuth
- Asklepios Kliniken GmbH, Asklepios Fachkliniken Muenchen, Gauting, Germany
| | - Thomas Duell
- Asklepios Kliniken GmbH, Asklepios Fachkliniken Muenchen, Gauting, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Farkhad Manapov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Adaptive intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: Is a routine adaptation beneficial? Radiother Oncol 2021; 158:118-124. [PMID: 33636232 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tumor and anatomical changes during radiotherapy have been observed in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from many previous studies. We hypothesized that a routinely scheduled adaptive radiotherapy would have clinical important dose benefits to lower the risk of toxicities, without increasing the tumor recurrences. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 92 consecutive patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC between November 2017 and March 2019. All eligible patients should received simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). A mid-treatment CT simulation and a new adapted plan were routinely given after the first 20 fractions. The organs at risk (OARs) were delineated per RTOG 1106 atlas. Dose-volume histograms were quantitatively compared between the initial and composite adaptive plans. Logistic regression was applied to analyze the dose-response relationship. Clinical endpoints included acute symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP2) and esophagitis (RE2), local and regional tumor control, and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Sixty-four eligible patients received adaptive SIB-IMRT were consecutively included. The GTVs reduced by a median of -38.2% after 42 to 44 Gy in 20 fractions of radiotherapy. By adapting to tumor and anatomical changes, dosimetric parameters of OARs decreased significantly. The mean lung dose decreased by an average of -74.8 cGy, and mean esophagus dose was lower by 183.1 cGy. We found grade 2 or higher acute RP in 11 patients (17.2%), and RE2 in 28 patients (43.8%). Commonly used lung and esophagus dose metrics were significantly associated with RP2 and RE2. The adaptation could reduce RP2 probability by 3%, and RE2 risk by 5%. Subgroups with higher OARs dose or larger tumor shrinkage may get more dose and toxicities benefits. The estimated median PFS was 12.5 months from the start of radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that the routinely adaptive SIB-IMRT strategy could significantly reduce the dose to surrounding normal tissues, potentially lower the associated acute RP and RE, without increasing the risk of tumor recurrences.
Collapse
|
17
|
Mielgo-Rubio X, Rojo F, Mezquita-Pérez L, Casas F, Wals A, Juan M, Aguado C, Garde-Noguera J, Vicente D, Couñago F. Deep diving in the PACIFIC: Practical issues in stage III non-small cell lung cancer to avoid shipwreck. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11:898-917. [PMID: 33312885 PMCID: PMC7701908 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i11.898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
After publication of the PACIFIC trial results, immune checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy was included in the treatment algorithm of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The PACIFIC trial demonstrated that 12 mo of durvalumab consolidation therapy after radical-intent platinum doublet chemotherapy with concomitant radiotherapy improved both progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. This is the first treatment in decades to successfully improve survival in this clinical setting, with manageable toxicity and without deterioration in quality of life. The integration of durvalumab in the management of locally advanced NSCLC accentuates the need for multidisciplinary, coordinated decision-making among lung cancer specialists, bringing new challenges and controversies as well as important changes in clinical work routines. The aim of the present article is to review-from a practical, multidisciplinary perspective-the findings and implications of the PACIFIC trial. We evaluate the immunobiological basis of durvalumab as well as practical aspects related to programmed cell death ligand 1 determination. In addition, we comprehensively assess the efficacy and toxicity data from the PACIFIC trial and discuss the controversies and practical aspects of incorporating durvalumab into routine clinical practice. Finally, we discuss unresolved questions and future challenges. In short, the present document aims to provide clinicians with a practical guide for the application of the PACIFIC regimen in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xabier Mielgo-Rubio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid 28922, Spain
| | - Federico Rojo
- Department of Pathology, IIS-Jiménez Díaz-CIBERONC Foundation, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Laura Mezquita-Pérez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Laboratory of Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, Barcelona 08036, Spain
| | - Francesc Casas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona 08036, Spain
| | - Amadeo Wals
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla 41009, Spain
| | - Manel Juan
- Department of Immunology Service, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona 08036, Spain
| | - Carlos Aguado
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Javier Garde-Noguera
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia 46015, Spain
| | - David Vicente
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla 49001, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid 28028, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Balasubramanian A, Onggo J, Gunjur A, John T, Parakh S. Immune Checkpoint Inhibition With Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Safety Results. Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 22:74-82. [PMID: 33414053 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) administered concurrently with or after definitive chemoradiation (CRT) in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been detailed in several studies. We performed a systematic review to determine pneumonitis rates using ICIs with CRT. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched using keywords and MeSH terms. Studies using anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy, either sequentially or concurrently with CRT, for patients with stage III NSCLC were included. A meta-analysis of pneumonitis rates was performed based on weighted pooled proportion, using random-effects models. Weighting was performed by the inverse variance or standard error of event rates. Comparative analysis between groups was performed. Odds ratios (OR) were used as the primary summary statistics. A total of 13 studies were identified (6 prospective clinical trials and 7 real-world reports). Rates of grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis were significantly higher in clinical trials using anti-PD-1 therapy compared with PD-L1 inhibitors (8.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2%-11.9% vs. 4.4%; 95% CI, 3.0%-6.6%; OR, 2.0; P = .01). Clinical trials using concurrent ICI therapy with CRT had greater rates of grade 2 pneumonitis compared with sequential administration (23.0%; 95% CI, 15.8%-32.3% vs. 11.0%; 95% CI, 6.6%-17.8%; OR, 0.42; P = .02). Higher rates of grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis were observed in real-world studies compared with clinical trials involving sequential PD-L1 therapy (9.9%; 95% CI, 5.3%-17.9% vs. 4.4%; 95% CI, 2.9%-6.7%; OR, 0.43; P < .01). The suggestion of increased pneumonitis with a concurrent ICI strategy and using anti-PD-1 therapies warrants further consideration in future comparative studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James Onggo
- Department of Surgery, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ashray Gunjur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Thomas John
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sagun Parakh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Olivia-Newton John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Meng Y, Luo W, Wang W, Zhou C, Zhou S, Tang X, Hou L, Kong FMS, Yang H. Intermediate Dose-Volume Parameters, Not Low-Dose Bath, Is Superior to Predict Radiation Pneumonitis for Lung Cancer Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2020; 10:584756. [PMID: 33178612 PMCID: PMC7594624 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.584756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Although intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is now a preferred option for conventionally fractionated RT in lung cancer, the commonly used cutoff values of the dosimetric constraints are still mainly derived from the data using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). We aimed to compare the prediction performance among different dosimetric parameters for acute radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients with lung cancer received IMRT. Methods A total of 236 patients treated with IMRT were retrospectively reviewed in two independent groups of lung cancer from January 2014 to August 2018. The primary endpoint was grade 2 or higher acute RP (RP2). Dose metrics were generated from the bilateral lung volume outside GTV (VdoseG) and PTV (VdoseP). The associations of RP2 with clinical variables, dose-volume parameters and mean lung dose (MLD) were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The power of discrimination among each predictor was assessed by employing the bootstrapped area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Results Thirty-four (14.4%) out of 236 patients developed acute RP2 after the end of IMRT. The clinical parameters were identified as less important predictors for RP2 based on univariate and multivariate analysis. In both studied groups, the significance of association was more convincing in V20P, V30P, and MLDP (smaller Ps) than V5G and V5P. The largest bootstrapped AUC was identified for the V30P. We found a trend of better discriminating performance for the V20P and V30P, and MLDP than the V5G and V5P according to the higher values in AUC, IDI, and NRI analysis. To limit RP2 incidence less than 20%, the V30P cutoff was 14.5%. Conclusions This study identified the intermediate dose-volume parameters V20P and V30P with better prediction performance for acute RP2 than low-dose metrics V5G and V5P. Among all studied predictors, the V30P had the best discriminating power, and should be considered as a supplement to the traditional dose constraints in lung cancer treated with IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinnan Meng
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Institute of Enze Medical Health Academy, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Wei Luo
- Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Wei Wang
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Institute of Enze Medical Health Academy, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Chao Zhou
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Institute of Enze Medical Health Academy, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Suna Zhou
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Institute of Enze Medical Health Academy, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Xingni Tang
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Institute of Enze Medical Health Academy, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Liqiao Hou
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Institute of Enze Medical Health Academy, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Feng-Ming Spring Kong
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Institute of Enze Medical Health Academy, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China.,Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong University Shenzhen Hospital and Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong University Li Ka Shing Medical School, Hong Kong, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals/Seidman Cancer Center and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Haihua Yang
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Institute of Enze Medical Health Academy, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Offin M, Shaverdian N, Rimner A, Lobaugh S, Shepherd AF, Simone CB, Gelblum DY, Wu AJ, Lee N, Kris MG, Rudin CM, Zhang Z, Hellmann MD, Chaft JE, Gomez DR. Clinical outcomes, local-regional control and the role for metastasis-directed therapies in stage III non-small cell lung cancers treated with chemoradiation and durvalumab. Radiother Oncol 2020; 149:205-211. [PMID: 32361014 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) and durvalumab is standard therapy for patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Data is limited on outcomes with this regimen outside of clinical trials. Local-regional control rates remain undefined. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed patients with stage III unresectable NSCLCs treated between November 2017 and February 2019 with cCRT and ≥1 dose of durvalumab. We examined 12-month progression-free-survival (PFS), overall-survival (OS), toxicities, and the incidence and pattern of local-regional and metastatic failures. RESULTS Sixty-two patients (median follow-up 12 months) with median age of 66 years of which 73% had stage IIIB (n = 33) or IIIC (n = 12) disease started durvalumab a median of 1.5 months from the end of cCRT and were treated with a median of 8 months of durvalumab. Common reasons for stopping durvalumab included disease progression (32%, 20/62) and toxicity (24%, 15/62). The estimated 12-month PFS and OS were 65% (95% CI: 51-79%) and 85% (95% CI: 75-95%), respectively. The cumulative 12-month incidence of local-regional and distant failures were 18% (95% CI: 5.9-30%) and 30% (95% CI: 16.3-44.5%), respectively. Among patients with distant metastatic disease (n = 17), 47% had oligometastatic disease. High tumor mutation burden (≥8.8 mt/Mb) or PD-L1 (≥1% or PD-L1 ≥ 50%) did not predict improved PFS. CONCLUSIONS Outcomes with cCRT and durvalumab in practice align with the PACIFIC trial. A substantial minority of patients are candidates for metastasis-directed therapies at progression. Local regional outcomes appear improved to historical data of cCRT alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Offin
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States.
| | - Narek Shaverdian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
| | - Stephanie Lobaugh
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
| | - Annemarie F Shepherd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
| | - Daphna Y Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
| | - Abraham J Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
| | - Nancy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
| | - Mark G Kris
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States.
| | - Charles M Rudin
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States.
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
| | - Matthew D Hellmann
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States.
| | - Jamie E Chaft
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States.
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
| |
Collapse
|