1
|
Ratosa I, Montero A, Ciervide R, Alvarez B, García-Aranda M, Valero J, Chen-Zhao X, Lopez M, Zucca D, Hernando O, Sánchez E, de la Casa MA, Alonso R, Fernandez-Leton P, Rubio C. Ultra-hypofractionated one-week locoregional radiotherapy for patients with early breast cancer: Acute toxicity results. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100764. [PMID: 38516338 PMCID: PMC10955656 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy is the standard of care for all patients with breast cancer, irrespective of stage or prior treatments. While extreme hypofractionation is accepted for early-stage tumours, its application in irradiating locoregional lymph nodes remains controversial. Materials and methods A prospective registry analysis from July 2020 to September 2023 included 276 patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with one-week ultra-hypofractionation (UHF) at 26 Gy in 5 fractions on the whole breast (58.3 %) or thoracic wall (41.7 %) and ipsilateral regional lymph nodes and simultaneous integrated boost (58.3 %). Primary endpoint was assessment of acute adverse events (AEs). Secondarily, onset of early-delayed toxicity was assessed. A minimum 6-month follow-up was required for assessing potential treatment-related early-delayed complications. Acute or late complications attributable to treatment were assessed at inclusion using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 criteria. Results With a median follow-up of 19 months (range 1-49 months), 159 (57.6 %) patients reported AEs, predominantly grade (G) 1 (n = 139, 50.4 %) and G2 (n = 20, 7.8 %). Skin acute toxicity was common (G1/2: 134, G3: 14), while breast oedema occurred in 10 patients (G1: 9, G2: 1), and 15.9 % reported breast pain (G1: 42, G2: 2). Ipsilateral arm oedema was observed in 1.8 % patients. For patients with a follow-up beyond 6 months (n = 213), 23.4 % patients reported G1/G2 skin AEs, 8.8 % had G1/G2 breast/chest wall oedema, and 8.9 % experienced arm lymphedema. There were no cases of brachial plexopathy or G3 toxicity in this group of patients. Conclusions One-week UHF adjuvant locoregional radiation is well-tolerated, displaying low-toxicity profiles comparable to other studies using similar irradiation schedules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivica Ratosa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Angel Montero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Camilo José Cela, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel Ciervide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Alvarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Xin Chen-Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercedes Lopez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Zucca
- Department of Medical Physics, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ovidio Hernando
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Emilio Sánchez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Rosa Alonso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Carmen Rubio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Montero A, Ciérvide R, Cañadillas C, Álvarez B, García-Aranda M, Alonso R, López M, Chen-Zhao X, Alonso L, Valero J, Sánchez E, Hernando O, García de Acilu P, Fernandez-Letón P, Rubio C. Acute skin toxicity of ultra-hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for early breast cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 41:100651. [PMID: 37388711 PMCID: PMC10300060 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) is indicated to improve loco-regional control and survival. Former studies showed that addition of tumor bed boost in all age groups significantly improved local control although no apparent impact on overall survival but with an increased risk of worse cosmetic outcome. Even though shortened regimens in 3 weeks are considered the standard, recent studies have shown the non-inferiority of a treatment regimen of 5 fractions in one-week in both locoregional control and toxicity profile, although simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in this setting has been scarcely studied. Materials and Methods From March-2020 to March-2022, 383 patients with early breast cancer diagnosis and a median age of 56 years-old (range 30-99)were included in a prospective registry of ultra-hypofractionated WBI up to a total dose of 26 Gy in 5.2 Gy/fraction with a SIB of 29 Gy in 5.8 Gy/fraction in 272 patients (71%), 30-31 Gy in 6-6.2 Gy/fraction in 111 patients (29%) with close/focally affected margins. Radiation treatment was delivered by conformal 3-D technique in 366 patients (95%), VMAT in 16patients (4%) and conformal 3-D with deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) in 4patients (1%). Ninety-three per cent of patients received endocrine therapy and 43% systemic or targeted chemotherapy. Development of acute skin complications was retrospectively reviewed. Results With a median follow-up of 18 months (range 7-31), all patients are alive without evidence of local, regional or distant relapse. Acute tolerance was acceptable, with null o mild toxicity: 182 (48%) and 15 (4%) patients developed skin toxicity grade 1 and 2 respectively; 9 (2%) and 2 (0.5%) patients breast edema grade 1and 2 respectively. No other acute toxicities were observed. We also evaluated development of early delayed complications and observed grade 1 breast edema in 6 patients (2%); grade 1 hyperpigmentation in 20 patients (5%); and grade 1 and 2 breast induration underneath boost region in 10(3%) and 2 patients (0.5%) respectively. We found a statistically significant correlation between the median PTVWBI and presence of skin toxicity (p = 0.028) as well as a significant correlation between late hyperpigmentation with the median PTVBOOST (p = 0.007) and the ratio PTVBOOST/PTVWBI (p = 0.042). Conclusion Ultra-hypofractionated WBI + SIB in 5 fractions over one-week is feasible and well tolerated, although longer follow-up is necessary to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angel Montero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Camilo José Cela, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel Ciérvide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Beatriz Álvarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Rosa Alonso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercedes López
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Xin Chen-Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Leyre Alonso
- Department of Medical Physics, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jeannete Valero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Emilio Sánchez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ovidio Hernando
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Carmen Rubio
- Department of Medical Physics, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bufacchi A, Arcangeli G, Pasciuti K. Performance of auto-planning for VMAT hypofractionated left whole-breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost. Med Dosim 2023:S0958-3947(23)00025-0. [PMID: 37087355 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023]
Abstract
Retrospective analysis of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans for hypofractionated left whole-breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost to assess the performance of the auto-planning (AP) engine. Fifteen treatment plans, produced using manual optimization planning approach (MP) were replanned using (AP) approach. Dose-volume parameters were defined to quantify the quality of concurrent treatment plans assessing target coverage and sparing organs at risk (OARs). The Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used for statistical comparison of all results obtained from the use of the 2 approaches. Dose coverage for both PTVs, PTVbreast, and PTVboost, were similar with AP showing slightly significantly better results for the homogeneity index for both PTVs, for D98% of PTVbreast and D2% of PTVboost. AP plans provided a significant reduction of dose for ipsilateral lung and contralateral lung. No significant differences were observed for heart and contralateral breast. A percentage difference of -14.0% was found for the mean dose of left coronary artery between AP plans and MP plans. Despite increase of total MU by 4.3% for AP plans, planning time resulted about half of that of the MP approach. Although PTVs doses were similar between MP and AP plans, AP plans generally spared OARs significantly better than MP plans. Furthermore, the shortest AP treatment plan time approach was attractive with respect to the workload.
Collapse
|
4
|
Thorpe CS, DeWees TA, Laughlin BS, Vallow LA, Seneviratne D, Pockaj BA, Cronin PA, Halyard MY, Vern-Gross TZ, McGee LA, McLaughlin SA, Voss MM, Golafshar MA, Bulman GF, Vargas CE. Pilot/Phase II Trial of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy to the Whole Breast Alone Before Breast Conserving Surgery. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101111. [PMID: 36483068 PMCID: PMC9723298 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Our purpose was to report the results of a phase II trial of patients with breast cancer treated with hypofractionated whole breast radiation therapy (RT) before breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Methods and materials Between 2019 and 2020, patients with cT0-T2, N0, M0 breast cancer were enrolled. Patients were treated with hypofractionated whole breast RT, 25 Gy in 5 fractions, 4 to 8 weeks before BCS. Pathologic assessment was performed using the residual cancer burden (RCB). Toxicities were assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4). Quality of life was assessed with Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, The Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale, Linear Analogue Self-Assessment, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Results Twenty-two patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 7.6 months (range, 0.2-16.8). Seven (32%) and 2 (9%) patients experienced grade 2+ or 3 toxicities, respectively. Overall quality of life Linear Analogue Self-Assessment and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System did not change significantly from baseline (P = .21 and P = .72, respectively). There was no clinically significant change (≥1 point) in any of The Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale domains. Only 1 (5%) patient experienced a clinical deterioration that corresponded to a "fair" outcome on the Harvard Cosmesis Scale. At pathologic evaluation, 14 (64%) patients had RCB-0 or RCB-I, including 3 (14%) patients with a pathologic complete response (RCB-0). Eight patients (36%) had RCB-II. No local or distant recurrences have been observed. Conclusions Extremely hypofractionated whole breast RT before BCS is a feasible approach. There were low rates of toxicities and good cosmesis. Further investigation into this approach with RT before BCS is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | - Laura A. Vallow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Dee Seneviratne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | | | | | | | - Lisa A. McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Molly M. Voss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vakaet V, Deseyne P, Schoepen M, Stouthandel M, Post G, Speleers B, Van Greveling A, Monten C, Mareel M, Van Hulle H, Paelinck L, De Gersem W, De Neve W, Vandecasteele K, Veldeman L. Prone Breast and Lymph Node Irradiation in 5 or 15 Fractions: A Randomized 2 × 2 Design Comparing Dosimetry, Acute Toxicity, and Set-Up Errors. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:324-334. [PMID: 35717049 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prone whole breast irradiation results in lower dose to organs at risk compared with supine position, especially lung dose. However, the adoption of prone position for whole breast irradiation + lymph node irradiation remains limited and data on lymph node irradiation in 5 fractions are lacking. Although the study was ended prematurely for the primary endpoint (breast retraction at 2 years), we decided to report acute toxicity for prone and supine positions and 5 and 15 fractions. Additionally, dosimetry and set-up accuracy between prone and supine positions were evaluated. METHODS AND MATERIALS A randomized open-label factorial 2 × 2 design was used for an acute toxicity comparison between prone and supine positions and 5 and 15 fractions. The primary endpoint of the trial was breast retraction 2 years after treatment. In total, 57 patients were evaluated. Dosimetry and set-up errors were compared between prone and supine positions. All patients were positioned on either our in -house developed prone crawl breast couch or a Posirest-2 (Civco). RESULTS No difference in acute toxicity between prone and supine positions was found, but 5 fractions did result in a lower risk of desquamation (15% vs 41%; P = .04). Prone positioning resulted in lower mean ipsilateral lung dose (2.89 vs 4.89 Gy; P < .001), mean thyroid dose (3.42 vs 6.61 Gy; P = .004), and mean contralateral breast dose (0.41 vs 0.54 Gy; P = .007). No significant difference in mean heart dose (0.90 vs 1.07 Gy; P = .22) was found. Set-up accuracy was similar between both positions. CONCLUSIONS Unfortunately, the primary endpoint of the trial was not met due to premature closure of the trial. Acceleration in 5 fractions resulted in a lower risk of desquamation. Prone positioning did not influence acute toxicity or set-up accuracy, but did result in lower ipsilateral mean lung dose, thyroid dose, and contralateral breast dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Vakaet
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Pieter Deseyne
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Max Schoepen
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Product Design, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Michael Stouthandel
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Giselle Post
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Bruno Speleers
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Christel Monten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Marcus Mareel
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hans Van Hulle
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Leen Paelinck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Werner De Gersem
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wilfried De Neve
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Katrien Vandecasteele
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Liv Veldeman
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vakaet V, Van Hulle H, Van de Vijver K, Hilderson I, Naert E, De Neve W, Vandorpe J, Hendrix A, Göker M, Depypere H, Vergauwen G, Van den Broecke R, De Visschere P, Braems G, Vandecasteele K, Denys H, Veldeman L. Safety of pre- or postoperative accelerated radiotherapy in 5 fractions: A randomized pilot trial. Breast 2022; 62:10-15. [PMID: 35091184 PMCID: PMC8800131 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Neo-adjuvant radiotherapy (NART) for breast cancer has shown promising survival results in retrospective trials. However, there are some obstacles such as a chemotherapy delay, an increased overall treatment time (OTT) and the risk of increasing surgical morbidity. Accelerated radiotherapy (RT) in 5 fractions allows to deliver NART in a very short time span and minimizes the delay of surgery and chemotherapy. This trial investigates this NART schedule for safety, feasibility and OTT. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty patients eligible for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and breast conserving surgery, were randomized between NART before NACT or NACT and postoperative RT. In both arms, RT treatment was given in 5 fractions to the whole breast with a simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) on the tumor(bed). Lymph node irradiation was given concomitantly in case of lymph node involvement. OTT was defined as the time from diagnosis to last surgery in the intervention group, while in the control group the time between diagnosis and last RT-fraction was used. In the intervention group NACT-delay was defined as time between diagnosis and start of chemotherapy. RESULTS 20 patients were included, and 19 patients completed treatment. OTT was significantly shorter in the intervention group (mean 218 days, range 196-253) compared to the control group (mean 237, range 211-268, p = 0.001). The difference in mean duration from diagnosis to the first treatment was a non-significant 4 days longer (31 vs 27 days, p = 0.28), but the start of NACT after diagnosis was delayed by 21 days (48 vs 27 days, p < 0.001). NART did not result in additional surgery complications. CONCLUSION This pilot trial is the first to report on accelerated NART in 5 fractions with SIB. NART before NACT resulted in a shorter OTT with good safety results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Vakaet
- Dept. of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| | - Hans Van Hulle
- Dept. of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium.
| | - Koen Van de Vijver
- Dept. of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium; Dept. of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.
| | | | - Eline Naert
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium; Dept. of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Belgium.
| | | | - Jo Vandorpe
- Dept. of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium; Dept. of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.
| | - An Hendrix
- Dept. of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium.
| | - Menekse Göker
- Dept. of Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| | - Herman Depypere
- Dept. of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Dept. of Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| | | | - Rudy Van den Broecke
- Dept. of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Dept. of Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| | - Pieter De Visschere
- Dept. of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium; Dept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| | - Geert Braems
- Dept. of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Dept. of Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| | - Katrien Vandecasteele
- Dept. of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium; Dept. of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Belgium.
| | - Liv Veldeman
- Dept. of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jordan AN, Anning C, Wilkes L, Ball C, Pamphilon N, Clark CE, Bellenger NG, Shore AC, Sharp ASP, Valderas JM. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Spanish MINICHAL instrument into English for use in the United Kingdom. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2022; 20:39. [PMID: 35246164 PMCID: PMC8895672 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-022-01943-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hypertension is a highly prevalent condition, with optimal treatment to BP targets conferring significant gains in terms of cardiovascular outcomes. Understanding why some patients do not achieve BP targets would be enhanced through greater understanding of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, the only English language disease-specific instruments for measurement of HRQoL in hypertension have not been validated in accordance with accepted standards. It is proposed that the Spanish MINICHAL instrument for the assessment of HRQoL in hypertension could be translated, adapted and validated for use in the United Kingdom. The aim of the study was therefore to complete this process. Methods The MINICHAL authors were contacted and the original instrument obtained. This was then translated into English by two independent English-speakers, with these versions then reconciled, before back-translation and subsequent production of a 2nd reconciled version. Thereafter, a final version was produced after cognitive debriefing, for administration and psychometric analysis in the target population of patients living in the Exeter area (Southwest UK) aged 18–80 years with treatment-naïve grade II-III hypertension, before, during and after 18 weeks’ intensive treatment. Results The English-language instrument was administered to 30 individuals (median age: 58.5 years, 53% male). Psychometric analysis demonstrated a floor effect, though no ceiling effect. Internal consistency for both state of mind (StM) and somatic manifestations (SM) dimensions of the instrument were acceptable (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.81 and 0.75), as was test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.717 and 0.961) and construct validity, which was measured through co-administration with the EQ-5D-5L and Bulpitt-Fletcher instruments. No significant associations were found between scores and patient characteristics known to affect HRQoL. The EQ-5D-5L instrument found an improvement in HRQoL following treatment, with the StM and SM dimensions of the English language MINICHAL trending to support this (d = 0.32 and 0.02 respectively). Conclusions The present study details the successful English translation and validation of the MINICHAL instrument for use in individuals with hypertension. The data reported also supports an improvement in HRQoL with rapid treatment of grade II-III hypertension, a strategy which has been recommended by contemporaneous European guidelines. Trial registration ISRCTN registry number: 57475376 (assigned 25/06/2015).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew N Jordan
- NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, Vascular Medicine, University Hospitals Dorset, Exeter, UK. .,Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, EX2 5AX, UK.
| | - Christine Anning
- NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, Vascular Medicine, University Hospitals Dorset, Exeter, UK
| | - Lindsay Wilkes
- NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, Vascular Medicine, University Hospitals Dorset, Exeter, UK
| | - Claire Ball
- NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, Vascular Medicine, University Hospitals Dorset, Exeter, UK
| | - Nicola Pamphilon
- NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, Vascular Medicine, University Hospitals Dorset, Exeter, UK
| | - Christopher E Clark
- Health Services and Policy Research Group, Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care (APEx), NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Exeter, Smeall Building, St Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Nicholas G Bellenger
- Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, EX2 5AX, UK.,Department of Cardiology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - Angela C Shore
- NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, Vascular Medicine, University Hospitals Dorset, Exeter, UK.,Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, EX2 5AX, UK
| | - Andrew S P Sharp
- Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, EX2 5AX, UK.,Department of Cardiology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - Jose M Valderas
- Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, EX2 5AX, UK.,Health Services and Policy Research Group, Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care (APEx), NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Exeter, Smeall Building, St Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vakaet V, Van Hulle H, Quataert V, Deseyne P, Schoepen M, Paelinck L, Post G, Van Greveling A, Speleers B, Mareel M, De Neve W, Monten C, Veldeman L. Accelerated radiotherapy in patients over sixty years old after mastectomy: Acute and one-year physician-assessed toxicity and health-related quality of life. Breast Dis 2022; 41:261-266. [PMID: 35599462 DOI: 10.3233/bd-210080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Postmastectomy radiotherapy reduces the risk of locoregional recurrence in breast cancer patients. The first results on accelerated radiotherapy in five fractions after breast conserving surgery are promising. The data on postmastectomy radiotherapy in five or six fractions is limited. We now present the data on acute and one-year toxicity and health related quality of life (HRQoL) after postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients of sixty years or older. METHODOLOGY 119 patients received five fractions of 5.7 Gy to the chest wall and five fractions of 5.4 Gy to the lymph nodes over ten to twelve days. Physician-assessed toxicity were scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 toxicity scoring system and the LENT-SOMA scale. Fatigue was measured by the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-206). HRQoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire the breast cancer specific module and the BREAST-Q questionnaire. RESULTS Fatigue and edema were the most frequently observed physician-assessed toxicities. One year after radiotherapy only 12.9% experienced a clinically important deterioration in chest wall symptoms and in 22.9% of the patients were improved. Future perspective at one year after radiotherapy was improved in 40.0% of the patients. Patient-reported fatigue showed the greatest improvement. CONCLUSION Accelerated radiotherapy should be considered to minimize the burden of breast cancer treatment, especially in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Vakaet
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hans Van Hulle
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Viktor Quataert
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pieter Deseyne
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Max Schoepen
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Product Design, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Leen Paelinck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Giselle Post
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Bruno Speleers
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Marc Mareel
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wilfried De Neve
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Chris Monten
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Liv Veldeman
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Health-related quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients after different radiotherapy regimens. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 189:387-398. [PMID: 34216316 PMCID: PMC8357747 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06314-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate and compare health-related quality of life (HRQL) of women with early-stage breast cancer (BC) treated with different radiotherapy (RT) regimens. Methods Data were collected from five prospective cohorts of BC patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and different RT regimens: intraoperative RT (IORT, 1 × 23.3 Gy; n = 267), external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (EB-APBI, 10 × 3.85 Gy; n = 206), hypofractionated whole breast irradiation(hypo-WBI, 16 × 2.67 Gy; n = 375), hypo-WBI + boost(hypo-WBI-B, 21–26 × 2.67 Gy; n = 189), and simultaneous WBI + boost(WBI-B, 28 × 2.3 Gy; n = 475). Women ≥ 60 years with invasive/in situ carcinoma ≤ 30 mm, cN0 and pN0-1a were included. Validated EORTC QLQ-C30/BR23 questionnaires were used to asses HRQL. Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for confounding (age, comorbidity, pT, locoregional treatment, systemic therapy) were used to compare the impact of the RT regimens on HRQL at 12 and 24 months. Differences in HRQL over time (3–24 months) were evaluated using linear mixed models. Results There were no significant differences in HRQL at 12 months between groups except for breast symptoms which were better after IORT and EB-APBI compared to hypo-WBI at 12 months (p < 0.001). Over time, breast symptoms, fatigue, global health status and role functioning were significantly better after IORT and EB-APBI than hypo-WBI. At 24 months, HRQL was comparable in all groups. Conclusion In women with early-stage breast cancer, the radiotherapy regimen did not substantially influence long-term HRQL with the exception of breast symptoms. Breast symptoms are more common after WBI than after IORT or EB-APBI and improve slowly until no significant difference remains at 2 years posttreatment. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-021-06314-4.
Collapse
|
10
|
Van Hulle H, Vakaet V, Monten C, Deseyne P, Schoepen M, Colman C, Paelinck L, Van Greveling A, Post G, Speleers B, Vandecasteele K, Mareel M, De Neve W, Veldeman L. Acute toxicity and health-related quality of life after accelerated whole breast irradiation in 5 fractions with simultaneous integrated boost. Breast 2020; 55:105-111. [PMID: 33401157 PMCID: PMC7785945 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Acceleration of radiotherapy in 5 fractions for breast cancer can reduce the burden of treatment. We report on acute toxicity after whole-breast irradiation with a simultaneous integrated boost in 5 fractions over 10-12 days. MATERIAL AND METHODS Acute toxicity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of 200 patients, randomized between a 15- or 5-fractions schedule, were collected, using the CTCAE toxicity scoring system, the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 and the BREAST-Q questionnaire. The prescribed dose to the breast was either 15∗2.67 Gy (40.05 Gy) or 5∗5.7 Gy (28.5 Gy). 90% of patients received a SIB to a cumulative dose of 46.8 Gy (15∗3.12 Gy) or 31 Gy (5∗6.2 Gy). RESULTS Physician-assessed toxicity was lower for the 5-fractions group. A significant difference was observed for breast pain (p = 0.002), fatigue (p < 0.0001), breast edema (p = 0.001) and dermatitis (p = 0.003). Patients treated in 5 fractions reported better mean HRQoL scores for breast symptoms (p = 0.001) and physical well-being (p = 0.001). A clinically important deterioration in HRQoL of 10 points or more was also less frequently observed in the latter group for physical functioning (p = 0.0005), social functioning (p = 0.0007), fatigue (p = 0.003), breast symptoms (p = 0.0002) and physical well-being (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION In this single institute study, acute toxicity of accelerated breast radiotherapy in 5 fractions over 10-12 days seems to compare favourably to hypofractionated breast radiotherapy in 15 fractions. Less breast edema, dermatitis, desquamation, breast pain and fatigue are seen. Social and physical functioning are also less disturbed and patients have a better future perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Van Hulle
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium.
| | - Vincent Vakaet
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| | - Chris Monten
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| | - Pieter Deseyne
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| | - Max Schoepen
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Product Design, Kortrijk, Belgium.
| | - Cato Colman
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium.
| | - Leen Paelinck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| | | | - Giselle Post
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium.
| | - Bruno Speleers
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium.
| | - Katrien Vandecasteele
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| | - Marc Mareel
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium.
| | - Wilfried De Neve
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| | - Liv Veldeman
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Van Hulle H, Vakaet V, Post G, Van Greveling A, Monten C, Hendrix A, Van de Vijver K, Van Dorpe J, De Visschere P, Braems G, Vandecasteele K, Denys H, De Neve W, Veldeman L. Feasibility study on pre or postoperative accelerated radiotherapy (POP-ART) in breast cancer patients. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2020; 6:154. [PMID: 33062295 PMCID: PMC7547514 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00693-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In early-stage breast cancer, the cornerstone of treatment is surgery. After breast-conserving surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy has shown to improve locoregional control and overall survival rates. The use of breast radiotherapy in the preoperative (preop) setting is far less common. Nevertheless, it might improve disease-free survival as compared to postoperative radiotherapy. There is also a possibility of downsizing the tumour which might lead to a lower need for mastectomy. There are some obstacles that complicate its introduction into daily practice. It may complicate surgery or lead to an increase in wound complications or delayed wound healing. Another fear of preop radiotherapy is delaying surgery for too long. At Ghent University Hospital, we have experience with a 5-fraction radiotherapy schedule allowing radiotherapy delivery in a very short time span. Methods Twenty female breast cancer patients with non-metastatic disease receiving preop chemotherapy will be randomized between preop or postoperative radiotherapy. The feasibility of preop radiotherapy will be evaluated based on overall treatment time. All patients will be treated in 5 fractions of 5.7 Gy to the whole breast with a simultaneous integrated boost to the tumour/tumour bed of 5 × 6.2 Gy. In case of lymph node irradiation, the lymph node regions will receive a dose of 27 Gy in 5 fractions of 5.4 Gy. The total duration of therapy will be 10 to 12 days. In the preop group, overall treatment time is defined as the time between diagnosis and the day of last surgery, in the postop group between diagnosis and last irradiation fraction. Toxicity related to surgery, radio-, and chemotherapy will be evaluated on dedicated case-report forms at predefined time points. Tumour response will be evaluated on the pathology report and on MRI at baseline and in the interval between chemotherapy and surgery. Discussion The primary objective of the trial is to investigate the feasibility of preop radiotherapy. Secondary objectives are to search for biomarkers of response and toxicity and identify the involved cell death mechanisms and the effect of preop breast radiotherapy on the in-situ immune micro-environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Van Hulle
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Vincent Vakaet
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Giselle Post
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Annick Van Greveling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Chris Monten
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - An Hendrix
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jo Van Dorpe
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pieter De Visschere
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Geert Braems
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Katrien Vandecasteele
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wilfried De Neve
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Liv Veldeman
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|