1
|
Zhang G, Huang J, Wu G, Jin S, Wang K, Wu H, Zhang H, Yue H, Yang R, Wang Y, Wang Z, Qi Y. Correction method for ionization chamber dosimetry in flattening filter free radiotherapy based on Monte Carlo simulation. Med Phys 2025; 52:1833-1844. [PMID: 39688381 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Revised: 11/06/2024] [Accepted: 11/24/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical use of flattening filter free (FFF) radiotherapy has significantly increased in recent years due to its effective enhancement of dose rates and reduction of scatter dose. A proposal has been made to adjust the incident electron angle of the accelerator to expand the application of FFF beams in areas such as large planning target volumes (PTVs). However, the inherent softening characteristics and non-uniformity of lateral dose distribution in FFF beams inevitably lead to increased dosimetry errors, especially for ionization chambers widely used in clinical practice, which may result in serious accidents during FFF radiotherapy. PURPOSE This study constructs a comprehensive Monte Carlo model that encompasses not only conventional FFF beams but also incorporates FFF beams with varying incident electron angles, to investigate dosimetry errors and correction methods in FFF radiotherapy. METHODS We have innovatively introduced a FFF output correction factor (k Q F F F , Q W F F ${k}_{{Q}_{FFF},{Q}_{WFF}}$ ) to address dosimetry errors in various ionization chambers under different incident electron angle conditions in FFF beams. The primary variations ink Q F F F , Q W F F ${k}_{{Q}_{FFF},{Q}_{WFF}}$ were analytically determined to result from changes ins w , a i r ${s}_{w,air}$ and the perturbation correction terms of the ionization chamber. RESULTS Ionization chambers with smaller sensitive volumes typically exhibit reduced dosimetry errors. Our findings indicate that for ionization chambers with sensitive volumes ranging from 0.016 to 0.125 cm3, the dosimetry error under various FFF beam conditions consistently remains below 1.15%. This study provides crucial guidance for selecting appropriate ionization chambers in FFF radiotherapy. CONCLUSION A correlation was established between the absorbed dose to water in beams with a flattening filter (WFF) and those without (FFF), defined by the FFF output factor (O F Q F F F , Q W F F $O{F}_{{Q}_{FFF},{Q}_{WFF}}$ ). Using the proposed Monte Carlo model, theO F Q F F F , Q W F F $O{F}_{{Q}_{FFF},{Q}_{WFF}}$ can be derived and applied to theoretically calculate the absorbed dose to water in FFF beams at varying incident electron angles, with a relative standard uncertainty of 0.2. This study provides a valuable reference for clinical dose measurements and crucial support for establishing dose calibration standards in FFF radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guolong Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Modern Measurement and Control Technology, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing, China
- Division of Ionizing Radiation Metrology, National Institute of Metrology (NIM), Beijing, China
| | - Ji Huang
- Division of Ionizing Radiation Metrology, National Institute of Metrology (NIM), Beijing, China
| | - Guoxin Wu
- Key Laboratory of Modern Measurement and Control Technology, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing, China
| | - Sunjun Jin
- Division of Ionizing Radiation Metrology, National Institute of Metrology (NIM), Beijing, China
| | - Kun Wang
- Division of Ionizing Radiation Metrology, National Institute of Metrology (NIM), Beijing, China
| | - Hao Wu
- Beijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Zhang
- Division of Ionizing Radiation Metrology, National Institute of Metrology (NIM), Beijing, China
| | | | - Ruijie Yang
- Third Hospital of Beijing University, Beijing, China
| | - Yujie Wang
- Key Laboratory of Modern Measurement and Control Technology, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhipeng Wang
- Division of Ionizing Radiation Metrology, National Institute of Metrology (NIM), Beijing, China
| | - Yaping Qi
- Division of Ionizing Radiation Metrology, National Institute of Metrology (NIM), Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li G, Yu V, Ryan K, Gil M, Biancia CD. Feasibility of a Novel Surface-Guided Setup Technique to Reproduce Neck Curvature Using two Regions of Interest. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2024; 23:15330338241271946. [PMID: 39109645 PMCID: PMC11307372 DOI: 10.1177/15330338241271946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 06/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To improve the setup reproducibility of neck curvature using real-time optical surface imaging (OSI) guidance on 2 regions of interest (ROIs) to infer cervical spine (c-spine) curvature for surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) of head-and-neck (HN) and c-spine cancer. METHODS A novel SGRT setup approach was designed to reproduce neck curvature with 2 ROIs: upper-chest ROI and open-face ROI. It was hypothesized that the neck curvature could be reproduced if both ROIs were aligned within ±3 mm/2˚ tolerance. This was tested prospectively in 7 volunteers using real-time 3D-OSI guidance and lateral 2D-photography verification after the 3D and 2D references were captured from the initial conventional setup. Real-time SGRT was performed to align chest-ROI and face-ROI, and the longitudinal distance between them was adjustable using a head-support slider. Verification of neck curvature anteriorly and posteriorly was achieved by overlaying edge-extracted lateral pictures. Retrospectively, the relationship between anterior surface and spinal canal alignment was checked in 11 patients using their simulation CT (simCT) and setup cone-beam CT (CBCT). After the anterior surface was rigidly aligned, the spinal canal alignment was checked and quantified using the mean-distance-to-agreement (MDA) and DICE similarity index, and surface-to-spine correlation was calculated. RESULTS The reproducibility of neck curvatures using the 2xROI SGRT setup is verified and the mean neck-outline-matching difference is within ±2 mm in lateral photographic overlays. The chest-ROI alignment takes 110 ± 58 s and the face-ROI takes 60 ± 35 s. When the anterior body surface is aligned (MDA = 1.1 ± 0.6 mm, DICE = 0.96 ± 0.02,) the internal spinal canal is also aligned (MDA = 1.0 ± 0.3 mm, DICE = 0.84 ± 0.04) in 11 patients. The surface-to-spine correlation is c = 0.90 (MDA) and c = 0.85 (DICE). CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the feasibility of the novel 2-ROI SGRT setup technique to achieve reproducible neck and c-spine curvature regardless of neck visibility and availability as ROI. Staff training is needed to adopt this unconventional SGRT technique to improve patient setup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guang Li
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Victoria Yu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Ryan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary Gil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cesar Della Biancia
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Regnery S, Buchele C, Piskorski L, Weykamp F, Held T, Eichkorn T, Rippke C, Katharina Renkamp C, Klüter S, Ristau J, König L, Koerber SA, Adeberg S, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. SMART ablation of lymphatic oligometastases in the pelvis and abdomen: Clinical and dosimetry outcomes. Radiother Oncol 2022; 168:106-112. [PMID: 35121031 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To demonstrate dosimetry benefits and report clinical outcomes of stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) of abdominopelvic lymphatic oligometastases. PATIENTS & METHODS Prospective registry data of 26 patients with 31 oligoprogressive lymphatic metastases (1 - 2 lesions) who received SMART between April 2020 and April 2021 was analyzed. Prostate cancer was the most common histology (69%). Most patients (63%) had received previous abdominopelvic radiotherapy (RT). SMART was delivered in 3 - 7 fractions based on planning target volume (PTV) location and previous dose exposures. For SMART, the baseline plan was recalculated on daily 3D MR-imaging (predicted plan), and plan adaptation was mandatory in case of planning objective violations. RESULTS Plan adaptation was mostly performed due to violation of planning objectives in the predicted plan (134/140 fractions, 96%) and significantly improved plan dosimetry: 1) PTV coverage was increased (predicted: median 89%, adapted: median 95%, p < 0.001), 2) organs-at-risk (OAR) overdoses were reduced (predicted: 27/140 (19%), adapted: 1/140 (1%), p < 0.001) and 3) PTV overdoses were reduced (predicted: 21/140 (15%), adapted: 1/140 (1%), p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 9.8 months, one patient had in-field tumor progression and twelve patients had out-field tumor progression (at 6 months: progression-free survival: 63% [46 - 88%], local control rate: 97% [90 - 100%]). Treatment was tolerated well and no grade ≥ 3 toxicity was reported. CONCLUSION SMART improves target volume coverage and yields superior OAR protection compared to non-adaptive radiotherapy, thus representing an innovative approach to challenging cases, such as repeated radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lars Piskorski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Eichkorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Katharina Renkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonas Ristau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|