1
|
Hudson JM, Loblaw A, McGuffin M, Chung HT, Tseng CL, Helou J, Cheung P, Szumacher E, Liu S, Zhang L, Deabreu A, Mamedov A, Morton G. Prostate high dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Efficacy results from a randomized phase II clinical trial of one fraction of 19 Gy or two fractions of 13.5 Gy: A 9-year update. Radiother Oncol 2024; 198:110381. [PMID: 38879130 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE High dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as a monotherapy is an accepted treatment for localized prostate cancer, but the optimal dose and fractionation schedule remain unknown. We report on the efficacy of a randomized Phase II trial comparing HDR monotherapy delivered as 27 Gy in 2 fractions vs. 19 Gy in 1 fraction with a median follow-up of 9 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS Enrolled patients had low or intermediate-risk disease, <60 cc prostate volume and no androgen deprivation use. Patients were randomized to 27 Gy in 2 fractions delivered one week apart vs a single fraction of 19 Gy. RESULTS 170 patients were randomized: median age 65 years, median follow-up 107 months and median baseline PSA 6.35 ng/ml. NCCN risk categories comprised low (19 %), favourable (51 %), and unfavourable intermediate risk (30 %). The median PSA at 8 years was 0.08 ng/ml in the 2-fraction arm vs. 0.89 ng/ml in the single-fraction arm. The cumulative incidence of local failure at 8 years was 11.2 % in the 2-fraction arm vs. 35.9 % in the single-fraction arm (p < 0.001). The incidence of distant failure at 8 years was 3.8 % in the 2-fraction arm and 2.5 % in the single-fraction arm (p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS HDR monotherapy delivered in two fractions of 13.5 Gy demonstrated a persistent cancer control rate at 8 years and was well-tolerated. Single-fraction monotherapy yielded poor oncologic control and is not recommended. These findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on optimal HDR monotherapy strategies for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Hudson
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Hans T Chung
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Joelle Helou
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Ewa Szumacher
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Stanley Liu
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrea Deabreu
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Gerard Morton
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moll M, Nechvile E, Kirisits C, Komina O, Pajer T, Kohl B, Miszczyk M, Widder J, Knocke-Abulesz TH, Goldner G. Radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer: a multicenter analysis evaluating tumor control and late toxicity after brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy in 1293 patients. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:698-705. [PMID: 38488901 PMCID: PMC11272802 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02222-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Comparing oncological outcomes and toxicity after primary treatment of localized prostate cancer using HDR- or LDR-mono-brachytherapy (BT), or conventionally (CF) or moderately hypofractionated (HF) external beam radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospectively, patients with low- (LR) or favorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer treated between 03/2000 and 09/2022 in two centers were included. Treatment was performed using either CF with total doses between 74 and 78 Gy, HF with 2.4-2.6 Gy per fraction in 30 fractions, or LDR- or HDR-BT. Biochemical control (BC) according to the Phoenix criteria, and late gastrointestinal (GI), and genitourinary (GU) toxicity according to RTOG/EORTC criteria were assessed. RESULTS We identified 1293 patients, 697 with LR and 596 with IR prostate cancer. Of these, 470, 182, 480, and 161 were treated with CF, HF, LDR-BT, and HDR-BT, respectively. For BC, we did not find a significant difference between treatments in LR and IR (p = 0.31 and 0.72). The 5‑year BC for LR was between 93 and 95% for all treatment types. For IR, BC was between 88% in the CF and 94% in the HF group. For CF and HF, maximum GI and GU toxicity grade ≥ 2 was between 22 and 27%. For LDR-BT, we observed 67% grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity. Maximum GI grade ≥ 2 toxicity was 9%. For HDR-BT, we observed 1% GI grade ≥ 2 toxicity and 19% GU grade ≥ 2 toxicity. CONCLUSION All types of therapy were effective and well received. HDR-BT caused the least late toxicities, especially GI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Moll
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | | | - Christian Kirisits
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Oxana Komina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik Hietzing, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Pajer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik Hietzing, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bettina Kohl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik Hietzing, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marcin Miszczyk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- IIIrd, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 15, 44-102, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Joachim Widder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Gregor Goldner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chien YT, Kao YS. Comment to "Dosimetric correlates of toxicities and quality of life following two-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for prostate cancer". Radiother Oncol 2023; 189:109919. [PMID: 37776904 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Tzu Chien
- Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Shuo Kao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Research and Development, Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ong WL, Evans M, Papa N, Williams S, Millar J. Population-based patient-reported quality of life outcomes following low-dose-rate versus high-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy for low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:789-795. [PMID: 37828817 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To evaluate patient reported quality of life outcomes (QoL) following low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) monotherapy for prostate cancer at a population-based setting. METHODS The study comprised men with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer in the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry Victoria (PCOR-Vic), who were treated with LDR-BT or HDR-BT monotherapy between 2015 and 2020 and completed the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire 12-month post-treatment. Men who had ADT were excluded (n = 12). Differences in substantial symptoms (i.e. 'moderate' or 'big' problem on a 5-point Likert scale) between LDR-BT and HDR-BT arms were evaluated using Pearson's chi-squared test. Multivariable linear regressions were used to estimate differences in EPIC-26 urinary, bowel and sexual functional domain scores between LDR-BT and HDR-BT arms. RESULTS Overall, 198 men were included in this study, of which 167 (84%) had LDR-BT and 31 (16%) had HDR-BT. 9 (4.6%), 10 (5.1%) and 56 (28%) reported substantial symptoms for overall urinary, bowel and sexual function at 12-month post-treatment, with no significant difference between LDR-BT and HDR-BT arms. The adjusted mean differences in urinary incontinence, urinary obstructive, bowel and sexual function domain scores between LDR-BT and HDT-BT were: -3.53 (-8.21 to 1.14), -1.27 (-6.88 to 4.35), -0.01 (-5.63 to 5.63) and -8.68 (-21.44 to 4.07) respectively - these were not statistically significant and did not meet the minimal clinically important difference. CONCLUSION This is the first Australian population-based study comparing QoL in men who had LDR-BT and HDR-BT, with no statistically or clinically significant differences in QoL observed at 12-month post-treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wee Loon Ong
- Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melanie Evans
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nathan Papa
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Scott Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeremy Millar
- Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jonušas J, Patasius A, Trakymas M, Venius J, Janulionis E, Smailyte G, Kincius M. Efficacy of focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of patients diagnosed with low or favourable: intermediate-risk prostate cancer-a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070020. [PMID: 37197816 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate cancer (PCa) is men's second most predominant cancer worldwide. Because the prostate-specific antigen test is used in diagnostics, PCa is more often diagnosed in the early stages, making radical treatment of the disease possible. However, it is estimated that over a million men worldwide suffer from radical treatment-related complications. Thus, focal treatment has been proposed as a solution, which aims to destroy the predominant lesson that determines the progression of the disease. The main objective of our study is to compare the quality of life and efficacy of patients diagnosed with PCa before and after the treatment with focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy and to compare results with focal low-dose-rate brachytherapy and active surveillance. METHODS AND ANALYSIS 150 patients diagnosed with low-risk or favourable intermediate-risk PCa who meet the inclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study. Patients are going to be randomly assigned to the study groups: focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy (group 1), focal low-dose-rate brachytherapy (group 2) and active surveillance (group 3). The study's primary outcomes are quality of life after the procedure and time without biochemical disease recurrence. The secondary outcomes are early and late genitourinary and gastrointestinal reactions after the focal high-dose and low-dose-rate brachytherapies and evaluation of the importance and significance of in vivo dosimetry used for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Bioethics committee approval was obtained before this study. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Vilnius regional bioethics committee; approval ID 2022/6-1438-911.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justinas Jonušas
- Clinic of Hematology and Oncology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
- Laboratory of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Ausvydas Patasius
- Laboratory of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania
- Institute of Health Sciences, Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Mantas Trakymas
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Jonas Venius
- Medical Physics Department, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania
- Laboratory of Biomedical Physics, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | - Giedre Smailyte
- Laboratory of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania
- Institute of Health Sciences, Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Marius Kincius
- Department of Oncourology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zeng H, Dai J, Cao D, Wang M, Zhao J, Zeng Y, Xu N, Xie Y, Liu H, Zeng H, Sun G, Shen P. Safety and efficacy associated with single-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy in localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:525-535. [PMID: 37093230 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02063-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although single-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy (SFHDR) for localized prostate cancer has been tried in clinical trials, relevant medical evidence is currently lacking. It is necessary to systematically analyze the safety and efficacy of SFHDR. METHODS Comprehensive and systematic searches for eligible studies were performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. The primary endpoints included safety and efficacy, represented by toxic effects and biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), respectively. The proportion rates were used as the effect measure for each study and were presented with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) and related 95% prediction interval (PI). Restricted maximum-likelihood estimator (REML) and the Hartung-Knapp method were used in the meta-analysis. RESULTS Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis, including 1440 patients. The median age of patients was 66.9 years old (62-73 years old) and the median follow-up was 47.5 months (12-75 months). The estimates of cumulative occurrence for severe gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxic effects were 0.1% (95% CI 0-0.2%) and 0.4% (95% CI 0-1.2%), and for grade 2 toxic effects were 1.6% (95% CI 0.1-4.7%) and 17.1% (95% CI 5.4-33.5%), respectively. The estimate of 3‑year bRFS was 87.5% (95% CI 84.4-90.3%) and 71.0% (95% CI 63.0-78.3%) for 5‑year bRFS. The pooled bRFS rates for low-risk patients were 99.0% (95% CI 85.2-100.0%) at 3 years and 80.9% (95% CI 75.4-85.9%) at 5 years, and the risk group was found to be statistically correlated with bRFS (3-year bRFS, P < 0.01; 5‑year bRFS, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION SFHDR is associated with favorable tolerability and suboptimal clinical benefit in patients with localized prostate cancer. Ongoing and planned high-quality prospective studies are necessary to verify its safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Zeng
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jindong Dai
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Dehong Cao
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Minghao Wang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jinge Zhao
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yuhao Zeng
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Nanwei Xu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yandong Xie
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Haolin Liu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hao Zeng
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Guangxi Sun
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| | - Pengfei Shen
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Du TQ, Liu R, Zhang Q, Luo H, Chen Y, Tan M, Wang Q, Wu X, Liu Z, Sun S, Yang K, Tian J, Wang X. Does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? A systematic review of in vitro studies. Eur J Med Res 2022; 27:306. [PMID: 36572945 PMCID: PMC9793637 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00942-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Charged particle beams from protons to carbon ions provide many significant physical benefits in radiation therapy. However, preclinical studies of charged particle therapy for prostate cancer are extremely limited. The aim of this study was to comprehensively investigate the biological effects of charged particles on prostate cancer from the perspective of in vitro studies. METHODS We conducted a systematic review by searching EMBASE (OVID), Medline (OVID), and Web of Science databases to identify the publications assessing the radiobiological effects of charged particle irradiation on prostate cancer cells. The data of relative biological effectiveness (RBE), surviving fraction (SF), standard enhancement ratio (SER) and oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) were extracted. RESULTS We found 12 studies met the eligible criteria. The relative biological effectiveness values of proton and carbon ion irradiation ranged from 0.94 to 1.52, and 1.67 to 3.7, respectively. Surviving fraction of 2 Gy were 0.17 ± 0.12, 0.55 ± 0.20 and 0.53 ± 0.16 in carbon ion, proton, and photon irradiation, respectively. PNKP inhibitor and gold nanoparticles were favorable sensitizing agents, while it was presented poorer performance in GANT61. The oxygen enhancement ratio values of photon and carbon ion irradiation were 2.32 ± 0.04, and 1.77 ± 0.13, respectively. Charged particle irradiation induced more G0-/G1- or G2-/M-phase arrest, more expression of γ-H2AX, more apoptosis, and lower motility and/or migration ability than photon irradiation. CONCLUSIONS Both carbon ion and proton irradiation have advantages over photon irradiation in radiobiological effects on prostate cancer cell lines. Carbon ion irradiation seems to have further advantages over proton irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian-Qi Du
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 509 Nanchang Rd, Lanzhou, 730000 Gansu People’s Republic of China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu People’s Republic of China
| | - Ruifeng Liu
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 509 Nanchang Rd, Lanzhou, 730000 Gansu People’s Republic of China ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Graduate School, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China ,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ion Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu People’s Republic of China
| | - Qiuning Zhang
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 509 Nanchang Rd, Lanzhou, 730000 Gansu People’s Republic of China ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Graduate School, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China ,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ion Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu People’s Republic of China
| | - Hongtao Luo
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 509 Nanchang Rd, Lanzhou, 730000 Gansu People’s Republic of China ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Graduate School, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China ,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ion Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu People’s Republic of China
| | - Yanliang Chen
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 509 Nanchang Rd, Lanzhou, 730000 Gansu People’s Republic of China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu People’s Republic of China
| | - Mingyu Tan
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 509 Nanchang Rd, Lanzhou, 730000 Gansu People’s Republic of China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu People’s Republic of China
| | - Qian Wang
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 509 Nanchang Rd, Lanzhou, 730000 Gansu People’s Republic of China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu People’s Republic of China
| | - Xun Wu
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 509 Nanchang Rd, Lanzhou, 730000 Gansu People’s Republic of China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhiqiang Liu
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 509 Nanchang Rd, Lanzhou, 730000 Gansu People’s Republic of China ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Graduate School, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China ,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ion Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu People’s Republic of China
| | - Shilong Sun
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 509 Nanchang Rd, Lanzhou, 730000 Gansu People’s Republic of China ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Graduate School, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China ,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ion Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu People’s Republic of China
| | - Kehu Yang
- grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu People’s Republic of China
| | - Jinhui Tian
- grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaohu Wang
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 509 Nanchang Rd, Lanzhou, 730000 Gansu People’s Republic of China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu People’s Republic of China ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Graduate School, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China ,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ion Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A Prospective Study of MR-Guided Focal Salvage High Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: Updated Results of 30 Patients. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:e531-e537. [PMID: 35718075 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 05/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Limited prospective data on focal salvage high dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy are available. We sought to explore the toxicities, health related quality of life (HRQOL) and efficacy of focal salvage HDR brachytherapy in a prospective clinical trial. This report represents updated results of previously published data. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after previous external beam radiotherapy and/or brachytherapy were enrolled. Patients received MRI-guided, ultrasound-based focal HDR brachytherapy delivered over two fractions of 13.5 Gy delivered 1-2 weeks apart. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was not used. RESULTS Thirty patients were treated between 2012-2019. At a median follow-up of 39 months, the three-year biochemical failure-free rate was 61.8% (95% CI 44.0-86.6%), and three-year ADT/salvage therapy-free rate was 86.0% (95% CI 74.1-99.8%). Seventeen patients experienced subsequent biochemical failure, 9 have received ADT and/or further local salvage, and no patients have died from prostate cancer. Of the 28 patients who had a post-treatment MRI, 26 had a local treatment response. No acute grade ≥ 3 GU/GI toxicity was observed. One temporary late grade 3 GU toxicity event occurred, and no late grade ≥ 3 GI toxicity was seen. No significant decline in urinary or bowel HRQOL was observed. CONCLUSIONS Focal salvage HDR brachytherapy has a favourable side effect profile, no significant decline in HRQOL and 3-year biochemical control rates in line with other salvage options. While early MRI response at the treated site is common, this does not preclude subsequent biochemical failure.
Collapse
|
9
|
Corkum MT, Achard V, Morton G, Zilli T. Ultrahypofractionated Radiotherapy for Localised Prostate Cancer: How Far Can We Go? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 34:340-349. [PMID: 34961659 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Following adoption of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy as a standard for localised prostate cancer, ultrahypofractioned radiotherapy delivered in five to seven fractions is rapidly being embraced by clinical practice and international guidelines. However, the question remains: how low can we go? Can radiotherapy for prostate cancer be delivered in fewer than five fractions? The current review summarises the evidence that radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer can be safely and effectively delivered in fewer than five fractions using high dose rate brachytherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy. We also discuss important lessons learned from the single-fraction high dose rate brachytherapy experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M T Corkum
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - V Achard
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - G Morton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - T Zilli
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lecavalier-Barsoum M, Khosrow-Khavar F, Asiev K, Popovic M, Vuong T, Enger SA. Utilization of brachytherapy in Quebec, Canada. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:1282-1288. [PMID: 34420860 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 06/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Despite the excellent clinical outcomes from brachytherapy treatments compared with other modalities and the low associated costs, there have been reports of a decline in utilization of brachytherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate in detail the trend in utilization of brachytherapy in the province of Québec, Canada, from 2011 to 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS All radiotherapy clinics in the province of Quebec, and among these the clinics that provide brachytherapy treatments, were identified. This observational retrospective cohort study involved analysis of data compiled by the Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux du Québec for the period of 2011 to end of 2019 on all brachytherapy procedures performed in the province of Quebec. Time series graphs were used to describe the number of high dose rate (HDR) and low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy treatments during the studied time period. Statistical analysis was conducted using R statistical software. RESULTS Between 2011 and 2019, 12 hospitals in the province of Québec provided radiotherapy treatments, and all of them offered brachytherapy services. The median annual number of brachytherapy sessions was 4413 (range 3930-4829). HDR brachytherapy represented over 90% of all brachytherapy treatments throughout the study period. Significant changes over time were observed in the number of treatments: at least 5% change was seen only for the two most common subtypes of brachytherapy, HDR interstitial and HDR intracavitary, with an increase of 9.6% and a decrease of 9.2%, respectively. The use of other subtypes of brachytherapy (HDR-plesiotherapy, LDR-interstitial, LDR-intracavitary, LDR-eye plaque) was stable between 2011 and 2019, with ≤ 2.5% variation. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates an overall steady use of brachytherapy between 2011 and 2019 in Quebec. Brachytherapy offers numerous advantages for the treatment of diverse cancer sites. Although more sophisticated external beam radiotherapy treatments have emerged in the last decades, the precision and cost-effectiveness of brachytherapy remain unbeaten. To ensure the continued use and availability of brachytherapy, governments must put in place policies and regulations to that effect. Training and exposure of future health care professionals to brachytherapy within Quebec and Canada is essential to provide all patients the same access to this life saving modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magali Lecavalier-Barsoum
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill, University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Farzin Khosrow-Khavar
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Krum Asiev
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Medical Physics, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Marija Popovic
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Te Vuong
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill, University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Shirin A Enger
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Medical Physics, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Roy A, Brenneman RJ, Hogan J, Barnes JM, Huang Y, Morris R, Goddu S, Altman M, Garcia-Ramirez J, Li H, Zoberi JE, Bullock A, Kim E, Smith Z, Figenshau R, Andriole GL, Baumann BC, Michalski JM, Gay HA. Does the sequence of high-dose rate brachytherapy boost and IMRT for prostate cancer impact early toxicity outcomes? Results from a single institution analysis. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 29:47-53. [PMID: 34136665 PMCID: PMC8182264 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The optimal sequence of HDR-BT boost and EBRT for prostate cancer is unclear. We compared early toxicity based on the timing of HDR-BT boost. The timing of HDR-BT was not based on any specific patient or clinical factors. We found no difference in early GI/GU toxicity between the two groups. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate late toxicity and long-term disease control.
Background We present the first report comparing early toxicity outcomes with high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost upfront versus intensity modulated RT (IMRT) upfront combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as definitive management for intermediate risk or higher prostate cancer. Methods and Materials We reviewed all non-metastatic prostate cancer patients who received HDR-BT boost from 2014 to 2019. HDR-BT boost was offered to patients with intermediate-risk disease or higher. ADT use and IMRT target volume was based on NCCN risk group. IMRT dose was typically 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the prostate and seminal vesicles ± pelvic lymph nodes. HDR-BT dose was 15 Gy in 1 fraction, delivered approximately 3 weeks before or after IMRT. The sequence was based on physician preference. Biochemical recurrence was defined per ASTRO definition. Gastrointestinal (GI) and Genitourinary (GU) toxicity was graded per CTCAE v5.0. Pearson Chi-squared test and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare toxicity rates. P-value < 0.05 was significant. Results Fifty-eight received HDR-BT upfront (majority 2014–2016) and 57 IMRT upfront (majority 2017–2018). Median follow-up was 26.0 months. The two cohorts were well-balanced for baseline patient/disease characteristics and treatment factors. There were differences in treatment sequence based on the year in which patients received treatment. Overall, rates of grade 3 or higher GI or GU toxicity were <1%. There was no significant difference in acute or late GI or GU toxicity between the two groups. Conclusion We found no significant difference in GI/GU toxicity in intermediate-risk or higher prostate cancer patients receiving HDR-BT boost upfront versus IMRT upfront combined with ADT. These findings suggest that either approach may be reasonable. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate late toxicity and long-term disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Roy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Randall J. Brenneman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Jacob Hogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Justin M. Barnes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Yi Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Robert Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Sreekrishna Goddu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Michael Altman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Jose Garcia-Ramirez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Harold Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Jacqueline E. Zoberi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Arnold Bullock
- Department of Urology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Eric Kim
- Department of Urology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Zachary Smith
- Department of Urology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Robert Figenshau
- Department of Urology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Gerald L. Andriole
- Department of Urology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Brian C. Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Jeff M. Michalski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Hiram A. Gay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Corresponding author at: Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4921 Parkview Place, LL, Campus Box 8224, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States.
| |
Collapse
|