1
|
Martin EA, Chauhan N, Dhevan V, George E, Laskar P, Jaggi M, Chauhan SC, Yallapu MM. Current status of biopsy markers for the breast in clinical settings. Expert Rev Med Devices 2022; 19:965-975. [PMID: 36524747 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2159807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A breast biopsy marker is a very small object that is introduced into the breast to serve as a tissue marker. The placement of a breast marker following a biopsy or to mark an abnormality in the breast has become standard practice in the clinical setting. Breast biopsy markers offer a wide range of benefits which includes the prevention of re-biopsy of a benign tumor, differentiating multiple lesions within the breast, evaluation of the extent of a tumor, and increased precision during surgery. AREAS COVERED This review article presents a range of breast biopsy markers used in clinical practice. First, an overview of the necessity of breast markers in healthy breast management. Second, it summarizes the diversity in composition, shape, unique properties and features, and bio-absorbable carriers of breast biopsy markers. Finally, it also discusses the possible use of clinically approved breast biopsy markers in various scenarios and their implications. EXPERT OPINION This review serves as a guide in the selection of an appropriate breast marker. We believe that some of the common drawbacks associated with current breast biopsy markers can be overcome by developing novel polymer-metal and composite-based breast biopsy markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elian A Martin
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, Texas, USA
| | - Neeraj Chauhan
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, Texas, USA.,South Texas Center of Excellence in Cancer Research, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, Texas, USA
| | - Vijian Dhevan
- Department of Surgery, the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, Texas, USA.,Department of Surgery, Valley Baptist Medical Center, Harlingen, Texas, USA
| | - Elias George
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, Texas, USA.,South Texas Center of Excellence in Cancer Research, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, Texas, USA
| | - Partha Laskar
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, Texas, USA.,South Texas Center of Excellence in Cancer Research, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, Texas, USA
| | - Meena Jaggi
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, Texas, USA.,South Texas Center of Excellence in Cancer Research, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, Texas, USA
| | - Subhash C Chauhan
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, Texas, USA.,South Texas Center of Excellence in Cancer Research, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, Texas, USA
| | - Murali M Yallapu
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, Texas, USA.,South Texas Center of Excellence in Cancer Research, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Groot Koerkamp ML, van den Bongard HD, Philippens ME, van der Leij F, Mandija S, Houweling AC. Intrafraction motion during radiotherapy of breast tumor, breast tumor bed, and individual axillary lymph nodes on cine magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 23:74-79. [PMID: 35833200 PMCID: PMC9271760 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Intrafraction motion of the breast and individual axillary lymph nodes was studied. Displacements were investigated using cine magnetic resonance imaging. Motion was separated into breathing and drift components. Medians of the maximum displacements were small, <3 mm for breast and lymph nodes. Intrafraction motion of the tumor (bed) was less in prone than in supine position.
Background and purpose In (ultra-)hypofractionation, the contribution of intrafraction motion to treatment accuracy becomes increasingly important. Our purpose was to evaluate intrafraction motion and resulting geometric uncertainties for breast tumor (bed) and individual axillary lymph nodes, and to compare prone and supine position for the breast tumor (bed). Materials and methods During 1–3 min of free breathing, we acquired transverse/sagittal interleaved 1.5 T cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast tumor (bed) in prone and supine position and coronal/sagittal cine MRI of individual axillary lymph nodes in supine position. A total of 31 prone and 23 supine breast cine MRI (in 23 women) and 52 lymph node cine MRI (in 24 women) were included. Maximum displacement, breathing amplitude, and drift were analyzed using deformable image registration. Geometric uncertainties were calculated for all displacements and for breathing motion only. Results Median maximum displacements (range over the three orthogonal orientations) were 1.1–1.5 mm for the breast tumor (bed) in prone and 1.8–3.0 mm in supine position, and 2.2–2.4 mm for lymph nodes. Maximum displacements were significantly smaller in prone than in supine position, mainly due to smaller breathing amplitude: 0.6–0.9 mm in prone vs. 0.9–1.4 mm in supine. Systematic and random uncertainties were 0.1–0.4 mm in prone position and 0.2–0.8 mm in supine position for the tumor (bed), and 0.4–0.6 mm for the lymph nodes. Conclusion Intrafraction motion of breast tumor (bed) and individual lymph nodes was small. Motion of the tumor (bed) was smaller in prone than in supine position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maureen L Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Corresponding author.
| | | | | | - Femke van der Leij
- Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stefano Mandija
- Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Computational Imaging Group for MR Diagnostics & Therapy, Center for Image Sciences, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Antonetta C Houweling
- Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Choi MS, Chang JS, Park RH, Kwon YJ, Kim YB, Moon JY, Yang G, Kim J, Kim JS. Heart-sparing Capability and Positional Reproducibility of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Left-sided Breast Radiation Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:e368-e375. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|