Characterizing spatial differences between SPECT-ventilation and SPECT-perfusion in patients with lung cancer undergoing radiotherapy

Incorporation of Functional Lung Imaging Into Radiation Therapy Planning in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Our purpose was to provide an understanding of current functional lung imaging (FLI) techniques and their potential to improve dosimetry and outcomes for patients with lung cancer receiving radiation therapy (RT). Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched from 1990 until April 2023. Articles were included if they reported on FLI in one of: techniques, incorporation into RT planning for lung cancer, or quantification of RT-related outcomes for patients with lung cancer. Studies involving all RT modalities, including stereotactic body RT and particle therapy, were included. Meta-analyses were conducted to investigate differences in dose-function parameters between anatomic and functional RT planning techniques, as well as to investigate correlations of dose-function parameters with grade 2+ radiation pneumonitis (RP). One hundred seventy-eight studies were included in the narrative synthesis. We report on FLI modalities, dose-response quantification, functional lung (FL) definitions, FL avoidance techniques, and correlations between FL irradiation and toxicity. Meta-analysis results show that FL avoidance planning gives statistically significant absolute reductions of 3.22% to the fraction of well-ventilated lung receiving 20 Gy or more, 3.52% to the fraction of well-perfused lung receiving 20 Gy or more, 1.3 Gy to the mean dose to the well-ventilated lung, and 2.41 Gy to the mean dose to the well-perfused lung. Increases in the threshold value for defining FL are associated with decreases in functional parameters. For intensity modulated RT and volumetric modulated arc therapy, avoidance planning results in a 13% rate of grade 2+ RP, which is reduced compared with results from conventional planning cohorts. A trend of increased predictive ability for grade 2+ RP was seen in models using FL information but was not statistically significant. FLI shows promise as a method to spare FL during thoracic RT, but interventional trials related to FL avoidance planning are sparse. Such trials are critical to understanding the effect of FL avoidance planning on toxicity reduction and patient outcomes.

Optimizing lung cancer radiation therapy: A systematic review of multifactorial risk assessment for radiation-induced lung toxicity

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy (RT) is essential in treating advanced lung cancer, but may lead to radiation pneumonitis (RP). This systematic review investigates the use of pulmonary function tests (PFT) and other parameters to predict and mitigate RP, thereby improving RT planning.

METHODS

A systematic review sifted through PubMed and on BioMed Central, targeting articles from September 2005 to December 2022 containing the keywords: Lung Cancer, Radiotherapy, and pulmonary function test.

RESULTS

From 1153 articles, 80 were included. RP was assessed using CTCAEv.4 in 30 % of these. Six studies evaluated post-RT quality of life in lung cancer patients, reporting no decline. Patients with RP and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) generally exhibited poorer overall survival. Notably, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) declined 24 months post-RT, while forced vital capacity (FVC) stayed stable. In the majority of studies, age over 60, tumors located in the lower part of the lung, and low FEV1 before RT were associated with a higher risk of RP. Dosimetric factors (V5, V20, MLD) and metabolic imaging emerged as significant predictors of RP risk. A clinical checklist blending patient and tumor characteristics, PFT results, and dosimetric criteria was proposed for assessing RP risk before RT.

CONCLUSION

The review reveals the multifactorial nature of RP development following RT in lung cancer. This approach should guide individualized management and calls for a prospective study to validate these findings and enhance RP prevention strategies.

Is individual perfusion dose-response different than ventilation dose-response for lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy?

OBJECTIVE

Current ventilation and perfusion dose-response studies focus on single-modalities (ventilation or perfusion) and perform pulmonary-toxicity assessment related to radiotherapy on a population-based basis. This study aims at quantitative and clinical evaluation of intrapatient differences between ventilation and perfusion dose-responses among lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.

METHODS

20 patients enrolled on a prospective functional avoidance protocol underwent single photon emission computed tomography-CT ventilation and perfusion scans pre- and post-radiotherapy. Relative changes in pre- to post-treatment ventilation and perfusion in lung regions receiving ≥20 Gy were calculated. In addition, the slopes of the linear fit to the relative ventilation and perfusion changes in regions receiving 0-60 Gy were calculated. A radiologist read and assigned a functional defect score to pre- and post-treatment ventilation/perfusion scans.

RESULTS

25% of patients had a difference >35% between ventilation and perfusion pre- to post-treatment changes and 20-30% of patients had opposite directions for ventilation and perfusion pre- to post-treatment changes. Using a semi-quantitative scale, radiologist assessment showed that 20% of patients had different pre- to post-treatment ventilation changes when compared to pre- to post-treatment perfusion changes.

CONCLUSION

Our data showed that ventilation dose-response can differ from perfusion dose-response for 20-30% of patients. Therefore, when performing thoracic dose-response in cancer patients, it is insufficient to look at ventilation or perfusion alone; but rather both modes of functional imaging may be needed when predicting for clinical outcomes.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The significance of this study can be highlighted by the differences between the intrapatient dose-response assessments of this analysis compared to existing population-based dose-response analyses. Elucidating intrapatient ventilation and perfusion dose-response differences may be valuable in predicting pulmonary toxicity in lung cancer patients post-radiotherapy.

4DCT ventilation function image-based functional lung protection for esophageal cancer radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

4DCT (four-dimensional computed tomography) can effectively obtain functional lung ventilation images for patients and integrate them into radiotherapy treatment planning. Studies have not been performed on esophageal cancer, and there is no clear consensus on the optimal functional lung threshold for functional lung.

METHODS

Functional lung images were generated for 11 patients with esophageal cancer. The correlation between the dose-volume parameters of functional lung (FL) as defined by different thresholds and the change of PFT/PDFT (pulmonary [diffusion] function test) metrics before and after radiotherapy were evaluated. FL-sparing planning was generated for each patient to preserve the functional lung and compared to conventional anatomical CT (non-sparing) planning.

RESULTS

There was a significant positive correlation between the FL0.8 (defined Jacobian value ≤ 0.8), FL0.84, and FL0.9 dose-volume parameters and ΔFEV1/FVC (reduction before and after radiotherapy), and the FL0.8‑V₃₀ correlation was the strongest (r = 0.819, P < 0.01). The FL-sparing planning had a target area conformity index and homogeneity index comparable to the non-sparing planning (P > 0.05). For FL, the FL-sparing planning achieved lower FL-MLD (6.30 ± 2.14 Gy vs. 7.83 ± 2.70 Gy), V₁₀ (17.13 ± 7.70% vs. 27.40 ± 9.48%), and V₂₀ (6.96 ± 3.85% vs. 11.63 ± 7.19%) compared to the non-sparing planning (P < 0.05), while heart and spinal cord doses were not significantly different between the two planning groups.

CONCLUSION

The 4DCT-based FL irradiation dose for esophageal cancer was significantly associated with a decrease in FEV1/FVC. The optimal FL defined as a Jacobian value ≤ 0.8 or about 21% of the whole lung volume may be a good choice. FL-sparing planning significantly reduced the FL dose without compromising target area coverage.

Functional lung imaging in thoracic tumor radiotherapy: Application and progress

Radiotherapy plays an irreplaceable and unique role in treating thoracic tumors, but the occurrence of radiation-induced lung injury has limited the increase in tumor target doses and has influenced patients’ quality of life. However, the introduction of functional lung imaging has been incorporating functional lungs into radiotherapy planning. The design of the functional lung protection plan, while meeting the target dose requirements and dose limitations of the organs at risk (OARs), minimizes the radiation dose to the functional lung, thus reducing the occurrence of radiation-induced lung injury. In this manuscript, we mainly reviewed the lung ventilation or/and perfusion functional imaging modalities, application, and progress, as well as the results based on the functional lung protection planning in thoracic tumors. In addition, we also discussed the problems that should be explored and further studied in the practical application based on functional lung radiotherapy planning.

Results of a Multi-Institutional Phase 2 Clinical Trial for 4DCT-Ventilation Functional Avoidance Thoracic Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Radiation pneumonitis remains a major limitation in the radiation therapy treatment of patients with lung cancer. Functional avoidance radiation therapy uses functional imaging to reduce pulmonary toxic effects by designing radiation therapy plans that reduce doses to functional regions of the lung. Lung functional imaging has been developed that uses 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) imaging to calculate 4DCT-based lung ventilation (4DCT-ventilation). A phase 2 multicenter study was initiated to evaluate 4DCT-ventilation functional avoidance radiation therapy. The study hypothesis was that functional avoidance radiation therapy could reduce the rate of grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis to 12% compared with a 25% historical rate, with the trial being positive if ≤16.4% of patients experienced grade ≥2 pneumonitis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Lung cancer patients receiving curative-intent radiation therapy (prescription doses of 45-75 Gy) and chemotherapy were accrued. Patient 4DCT scans were used to generate 4DCT-ventilation images. The 4DCT-ventilation images were used to generate functional avoidance plans that reduced doses to functional portions of the lung while delivering the prescribed tumor dose. Pneumonitis was evaluated by a clinician at 3, 6, and 12 months after radiation therapy.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven evaluable patients were accrued between April 2015 and December 2019. The median prescription dose was 60 Gy (range, 45-66 Gy) delivered in 30 fractions (range, 15-33 fractions). The average reduction in the functional volume of lung receiving ≥20 Gy with functional avoidance was 3.5% (range, 0%-12.8%). The median follow-up was 312 days. The rate of grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis was 10 of 67 patients (14.9%; 95% upper CI, 24.0%), meeting the phase 2 criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

4DCT-ventilation offers an imaging modality that is convenient and provides functional imaging without an extra procedure necessary. This first report of a multicenter study of 4DCT-ventilation functional avoidance radiation therapy provided data showing that the trial met phase 2 criteria and that evaluation in a phase 3 study is warranted.