1
|
Kanayama N, Ikawa T, Takano K, Arita H, Morimoto M, Hirata T, Ogawa K, Teshima T, Konishi K. Association of increasing gross tumor volume dose with tumor volume reduction and local control in fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for unresected brain metastases. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:95. [PMID: 39061079 PMCID: PMC11282845 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02487-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) is an important treatment strategy for unresected brain metastases. We previously reported that a good volumetric response 6 months after fSRS can be the first step for local control. Few studies have reported the association between gross tumor volume (GTV) dose, volumetric response, and local control in patients treated with the same number of fractions. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the GTV dose and volumetric response 6 months after fSRS in five daily fractions and identify the predictive GTV dose for local failure (LF) for unresected brain metastasis. METHODS This retrospective study included 115 patients with 241 unresected brain metastases treated using fSRS in five daily fractions at our hospital between January 2013 and April 2022. The median prescription dose was 35 Gy (range, 30-35 Gy) in five fractions. The median follow-up time after fSRS was 16 months (range, 7-66 months). RESULTS GTV D80 > 42 Gy and GTV D98 > 39 Gy were prognostic factors for over 65% volume reduction (odds ratio, 3.68, p < 0.01; odds ratio, 4.68, p < 0.01, respectively). GTV D80 > 42 Gy was also a prognostic factor for LF (hazard ratio, 0.37; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS GTV D80 > 42 Gy in five fractions led to better volume reduction and local control. The goal of planning an inhomogeneous dose distribution for fSRS in brain metastases may be to increase the GTV D80 and GTV D98. Further studies on inhomogeneous dose distributions are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoyuki Kanayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Center Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo- ku, Osaka-shi, 541-8567, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Toshiki Ikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Center Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo- ku, Osaka-shi, 541-8567, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Takano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka International Center Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka-shi, 541-8567, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Arita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka International Center Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka-shi, 541-8567, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masahiro Morimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Center Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo- ku, Osaka-shi, 541-8567, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takero Hirata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita-shi, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita-shi, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan
| | - Teruki Teshima
- Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, 3-1-10 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Konishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Center Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo- ku, Osaka-shi, 541-8567, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lüdeking M, Stemwedel K, Ramachandran D, Grosche S, Christiansen H, Merten R, Henkenberens C, Bogdanova NV. Efficiency of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy in NSCLC cell model. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1293745. [PMID: 38720797 PMCID: PMC11076864 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1293745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The current standard of radiotherapy for inoperable locally advanced NSCLCs with single fraction doses of 2.0 Gy, results in poor outcomes. Several fractionation schedules have been explored that developed over the past decades to increasingly more hypofractionated treatments. Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy, as an alternative treatment, has gained clinical importance due to shorter duration and higher patient convenience. However, clinical trials show controversial results, adding to the need for pre-clinical radiobiological studies of this schedule. Methods We examined in comparative analysis the efficiency of moderate hypofractionation and normofractionation in four different NSCLC cell lines and fibroblasts using several molecular-biological approaches. Cells were daily irradiated with 24x2.75 Gy (moderate hypofractionation) or with 30x2 Gy (normofractionation), imitating the clinical situation. Proliferation and growth rate via direct counting of cell numbers, MTT assay and measurements of DNA-synthesizing cells (EdU assay), DNA repair efficiency via immunocytochemical staining of residual γH2AX/53BP1 foci and cell surviving via clonogenic assay (CSA) were experimentally evaluated. Results Overall, the four tumor cell lines and fibroblasts showed different sensitivity to both radiation regimes, indicating cell specificity of the effect. The absolute cell numbers and the CSA revealed significant differences between schedules (P < 0.0001 for all employed cell lines and both assays) with a stronger effect of moderate hypofractionation. Conclusion Our results provide evidence for the similar effectiveness and toxicity of both regimes, with some favorable evidence towards a moderate hypofractionation. This indicates that increasing the dose per fraction may improve patient survival and therapy outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Lüdeking
- Radiation Oncology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Katharina Stemwedel
- Radiation Oncology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Dhanya Ramachandran
- Radiation Oncology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sinja Grosche
- Radiation Oncology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Hans Christiansen
- Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Roland Merten
- Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Hannover, Germany
- Radiation Oncology, Dorothea Christiane Erxleben Clinic, Wernigerode, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu N, Wang Z, Guo X, Zhao H. Dose-effect relationship of linear accelerator based stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:177. [PMID: 37904212 PMCID: PMC10617179 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02360-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to reveal the dose-effect relationship of linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with brain metastases (BM). MATERIALS AND METHODS The PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were used to identify studies that reported local tumour control after LINAC-based SRT in patients with BMs. Studies of other approaches that could affect local tumour control, such as whole brain radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, were excluded from the dose-effect relationship analysis. Data extracted included patient and treatment characteristics and tumour local control. Probit model in XLSTAT 2016 was used for regression analysis, and P < 0.05 was set as the statistically significant level. RESULTS After literature screening, 19 eligible studies involving 1523 patients were included in the probit model regression analysis. There was no significant dose-effect relationship between nominal BED10 and peripheral BED10 versus 12-month local control probability. There were significant dose effect relationships between the centre BED10 and the average BED10 versus the 12-month local control probability, with P values of 0.015 and 0.011, respectively. According to the model, the central BED10 and the average BED10 corresponding to probabilities of 90% 12-month local control were 109.2 GyBED10 (95% confidence interval (CI): 88.7-245.9 GyBED10) and 87.8 GyBED10 (95% CI: 74.3-161.5 GyBED10), respectively. A 12-month local control rate of 86.9% (95% CI: 81.7-89.7%) and 85.5% (95% CI: 81.2-89.2%) can be expected at a centre BED10 of 80 Gy and an average BED10 of 60 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSION For patients with BM treated with LINAC-based SRT, more attention should be given to the central and average doses of PTV. A clear definition of the dose prescription should be established to ensure the effectiveness and comparability of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126, Xiantai Street, 130033, Changchun City, Jilin, PR China
| | - Zhiqiang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126, Xiantai Street, 130033, Changchun City, Jilin, PR China
| | - Xin Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126, Xiantai Street, 130033, Changchun City, Jilin, PR China
| | - Hongfu Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126, Xiantai Street, 130033, Changchun City, Jilin, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gonzalez-Crespo I, Gomez-Caamano A, Pouso OL, Fenwick JD, Pardo-Montero J. A Biomathematical Model of Tumor Response to Radioimmunotherapy With αPDL1 and αCTLA4. IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS 2023; 20:808-821. [PMID: 35544486 DOI: 10.1109/tcbb.2022.3174454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
There is evidence of synergy between radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Radiotherapy can increase liberation of tumor antigens, causing activation of antitumor T-cells. This effect can be boosted with immunotherapy. Radioimmunotherapy has potential to increase tumor control rates. Biomathematical models of response to radioimmunotherapy may help on understanding of the mechanisms affecting response, and assist clinicians on the design of optimal treatment strategies. In this work we present a biomathematical model of tumor response to radioimmunotherapy. The model uses the linear-quadratic response of tumor cells to radiation (or variation of it), and builds on previous developments to include the radiation-induced immune effect. We have focused this study on the combined effect of radiotherapy and αPDL1/ αCTLA4 therapies. The model can fit preclinical data of volume dynamics and control obtained with different dose fractionations and αPDL1/ αCTLA4. A biomathematical study of optimal combination strategies suggests that a good understanding of the involved biological delays, the biokinetics of the immunotherapy drug, and the interplay between them, may be of paramount importance to design optimal radioimmunotherapy schedules. Biomathematical models like the one we present can help to interpret experimental data on the synergy between radiotherapy and immunotherapy, and to assist in the design of more effective treatments.
Collapse
|
5
|
Kanayama N, Ikawa T, Ohira S, Hirata T, Morimoto M, Ogawa K, Teshima T, Konishi K. Volumetric reduction of brain metastases after stereotactic radiotherapy: Prognostic factors and effect on local control. Cancer Med 2022; 11:4806-4815. [PMID: 35535485 PMCID: PMC9761087 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Few reports include volumetric measurements as endpoints after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) despite the importance of such measurements. This study aimed to (1) investigate the impact of the volumetric response (specifically, an over 65% and over 90% volume reduction in brain metastases) at 6 months post-SRT on local control and (2) identify the predictive factors for a volumetric response of over 65% and over 90%. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study included 250 unresected brain metastases (>0.3 cc) treated with SRT. Doses were stratified according to the biological effective dose (BED). The BED was calculated using four models: linear-quadratic (LQ): α/β = 10; LQ: α/β = 20; LQ cubic: α/β = 12; and LQ linear: α/β = 10. The median prescription dose was 30 Gy/3 fractions (BED20, 45). The median follow-up time after SRT was 18.6 months (range, 6.4-81.8 months). RESULTS In the multivariate analysis, over 65% volume reduction and over 90% volume reduction were prognostic factors for local control (hazard ratio: 2.370, p = 0.011 and hazard ratio: 3.161, p = 0.014, respectively). A dose of 80% of the gross tumor volume (GTV) D80 > BED20 58 was a predictive factor for over 65% and over 90% volume reductions (odds ratio: 1.975, p = 0.023; odds ratio: 3.204, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION Robust volume reduction of brain metastases at 6 months post-SRT can predict local control. GTV D80 in the LQ model: α/β = 20 may be warranted for good volume reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoyuki Kanayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Center InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Toshiki Ikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Center InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Shingo Ohira
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Center InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Takero Hirata
- Department of Radiation OncologyOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Masahiro Morimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Center InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Kazuhiko Ogawa
- Department of Radiation OncologyOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | | | - Koji Konishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Center InstituteOsakaJapan
| |
Collapse
|