Comparison and quantification of different concurrent chemotherapy regimens with radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical outcomes and theoretical results from an extended LQ and TCP model

Evaluation of the efficacy and feasibility of concurrent weekly docetaxel-nedaplatin and hypo-fractionated radiotherapy in atypical histologic subtypes of primary and metastatic mediastinal malignancies

Background

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of concurrent weekly docetaxel-nedaplatin and hypo-fractionated radiotherapy (hypo-RT) in atypical histologic subtypes of primary and metastatic mediastinal malignancies.

Methods

Fifty-four patients diagnosed with atypical primary or metastatic mediastinal malignancies were retrospectively reviewed. 30 patients received concurrent weekly docetaxel and nedaplatin and hypo-RT (CChRT group) and 24 patients had hypo-RT alone (hRT group). Overall response rate (ORR), in-field locoregional progression-free survival (LPFS) and toxicities were analyzed. The radiobiological effect was evaluated by the LQRGC/TCP model, incorporating four “R”s of radiobiology, Gompertzian tumor growth and radio-sensitizing effect of chemotherapeutic agent. The biologically effective doses (BEDs) were calculated.

Results

The median follow-up time was 29.2 months for all patients. The ORR was 86.7% in CChRT group, compared with 62.5% in hRT group (p=0.033). The 2-year in-field LPFS of CChRT and hRT group was 73.4% and 47.3%, respectively (p=0.003). There was no significant difference of any >=Grade 3 toxicities between the two groups (p=0.754). The mean total dose and mean BED by the LQRGC/TCP model in CChRT group were 58.2Gy and 72.34Gy, versus 52.6Gy and 67.25Gy in hRT group.

Conclusions

Concurrent weekly docetaxel-nedaplatin and hypo-RT achieved promising in-field LPFS and tolerable toxicities compared with hypo-RT alone in different histologic subtypes of primary and metastatic mediastinal malignancies.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of sugemalimab vs. chemotherapy as first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer

Objective: Sugemalimab is approved in China as a first-line treatment in combination with chemotherapy for metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of first-line additional sugemalimab in combination with chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Materials and methods: A three-state Markov model was designed to evaluate the costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of first-line sugemalimab combination with chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy over a 10-year period. Data on clinical outcomes were obtained from GEMSTONE-302 clinical trials. Costs and health utilities were collected from local databases and published literature. The uncertainty of the model parameters was explored through sensitivity analysis. Results: Compared to chemotherapy, sugemalimab treatment for NSCLC resulted in an extra 0.50 QALYs at an additional cost of $73627.99, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 148354.07/QALY at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $37663.26/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis indicated that the primary motivator in this model was the cost of sugemalimab. However, none of the parameters significantly affected the model's results. Conclusion: Sugemalimab combination therapy is not economically advantageous for the first-line management of metastatic non-squamous NSCLC, according to the Chinese healthcare system.

Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy Combined With Weekly Chemotherapy in Patients With Unresectable or Recurrent Thymic Epithelial Tumor: A Prospective, Single-Arm Phase 2 Study (GASTO-1042)

PURPOSE

This prospective phase 2 study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiation therapy (HRT) combined with concurrent weekly chemotherapy in patients with unresectable or recurrent thymic epithelial tumors (TETs).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with unresectable or recurrent intrathoracic TETs that could be encompassed within the radiation fields were enrolled. HRT using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique was administered with 3 different levels of radiation doses (51 Gy/17 fractions (fx), 48 Gy/12 fx, and 45 Gy/9 fx; biologically effective dose of 66.3-67.5Gy), combined with weekly docetaxel (25 mg/m²) and nedaplatin (25 mg/m²). Weekly thymosin α1 (1.6 mg) was administered from the start to 2 months after radiation therapy. The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), health-related quality of life (QOL), and toxicity were recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty eligible patients enrolled from August 1, 2018, to July 1, 2020, were analyzed. Most patients (82.0%) had stage IVB tumors. Patients had IMRT-HRT (36-51 Gy in 9-17 fx, median biologically effective dose of 67.2 Gy) and concurrent weekly docetaxel/nedaplatin (2-4 cycles). During a median follow-up of 25.0 months (14.0-40.0), the ORR was 83.7%, the 2-year PFS was 59.1%, and the 2-year OS was 90.0%. There was 1 (2.0%) in-field recurrence while 19 (38.0%) patients developed out-of-field recurrence. Grade 3 pneumonitis was observed in 1 patient (2.0%). The ORR, 2-year PFS, 2-year OS, and toxicity were similar among 3 dose levels. Fourteen (28.0%) patients had 2 to 4 courses of radiation therapy because of recurrent diseases. Only 1 suffered from grade 1 pulmonary fibrosis during follow-up. Most patients (88%) maintained a stable QOL within 1 year after radiation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

IMRT-HRT and concurrent weekly docetaxel/nedaplatin was effective and well tolerated in unresectable or recurrent TETs. Considering the common out-of-field recurrence, this combined regimen could be an option for repeated radiation therapy. Thymosin α1 might help lower the incidence of pneumonitis and maintain the QOL.