1
|
Marruecos Querol J, Jurado-Bruggeman D, Lopez-Vidal A, Mesía Nin R, Rubió-Casadevall J, Buxó M, Eraso Urien A. Contouring aid tools in radiotherapy. Smoothing: the false friend. Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:1956-1967. [PMID: 38493446 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03420-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Contouring accuracy is critical in modern radiotherapy. Several tools are available to assist clinicians in this task. This study aims to evaluate the performance of the smoothing tool in the ARIA system to obtain more consistent volumes. METHODS Eleven different geometric shapes were delineated in ARIA v15.6 (Sphere, Cube, Square Prism, Six-Pointed Star Prism, Arrow Prism, And Cylinder and the respective volumes at 45° of axis deviation (_45)) in 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 cm side or diameter each. Post-processing drawing tools to smooth those first-generated volumes were applied in different options (2D-ALL vs 3D) and grades (1, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20). These volumetric transformations were analyzed by comparing different parameters: volume changes, center of mass, and DICE similarity coefficient index. Then we studied how smoothing affected two different volumes in a head and neck cancer patient: a single rounded node and the volume delineating cervical nodal areas. RESULTS No changes in data were found between 2D-ALL or 3D smoothing. Minimum deviations were found (range from 0 to 0.45 cm) in the center of mass. Volumes and the DICE index decreased as the degree of smoothing increased. Some discrepancies were found, especially in figures with cleft and spikes that behave differently. In the clinical case, smoothing should be applied only once throughout the target delineation process, preferably in the largest volume (PTV) to minimize errors. CONCLUSION Smoothing is a good tool to reduce artifacts due to the manual delineation of radiotherapy volumes. The resulting volumes must be always carefully reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Marruecos Querol
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Girona, Spain.
- Research Group in Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics of Girona, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ICO, Girona, Spain.
| | - Diego Jurado-Bruggeman
- Research Group in Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics of Girona, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
- Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Girona, Spain
| | - Anna Lopez-Vidal
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Girona, Spain
| | - Ricard Mesía Nin
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, B-ARGO Group, IGTP, Badalona, Spain
| | | | - Maria Buxó
- Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
| | - Aranzazu Eraso Urien
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Girona, Spain
- Research Group in Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics of Girona, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Warren M, Barrett A, Bhalla N, Brada M, Chuter R, Cobben D, Eccles CL, Hart C, Ibrahim E, McClelland J, Rea M, Turtle L, Fenwick JD. Sorting lung tumor volumes from 4D-MRI data using an automatic tumor-based signal reduces stitching artifacts. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14262. [PMID: 38234116 PMCID: PMC11005973 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate whether a novel signal derived from tumor motion allows more precise sorting of 4D-magnetic resonance (4D-MR) image data than do signals based on normal anatomy, reducing levels of stitching artifacts within sorted lung tumor volumes. METHODS (4D-MRI) scans were collected for 10 lung cancer patients using a 2D T2-weighted single-shot turbo spin echo sequence, obtaining 25 repeat frames per image slice. For each slice, a tumor-motion signal was generated using the first principal component of movement in the tumor neighborhood (TumorPC1). Signals were also generated from displacements of the diaphragm (DIA) and upper and lower chest wall (UCW/LCW) and from slice body area changes (BA). Pearson r coefficients of correlations between observed tumor movement and respiratory signals were determined. TumorPC1, DIA, and UCW signals were used to compile image stacks showing each patient's tumor volume in a respiratory phase. Unsorted image stacks were also built for comparison. For each image stack, the presence of stitching artifacts was assessed by measuring the roughness of the compiled tumor surface according to a roughness metric (Rg). Statistical differences in weighted means of Rg between any two signals were determined using an exact permutation test. RESULTS The TumorPC1 signal was most strongly correlated with superior-inferior tumor motion, and had significantly higher Pearson r values (median 0.86) than those determined for correlations of UCW, LCW, and BA with superior-inferior tumor motion (p < 0.05). Weighted means of ratios of Rg values in TumorPC1 image stacks to those in unsorted, UCW, and DIA stacks were 0.67, 0.69, and 0.71, all significantly favoring TumorPC1 (p = 0.02-0.05). For other pairs of signals, weighted mean ratios did not differ significantly from one. CONCLUSION Tumor volumes were smoother in 3D image stacks compiled using the first principal component of tumor motion than in stacks compiled with signals based on normal anatomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Warren
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Population HealthUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | | | - Neeraj Bhalla
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation TrustLiverpoolUK
| | - Michael Brada
- Molecular & Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative BiologyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | - Robert Chuter
- Christie Medical Physics and EngineeringThe Christie NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - David Cobben
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation TrustLiverpoolUK
- Department of Health Data Science, Institute of Population HealthUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | - Cynthia L. Eccles
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
- RadiotherapyThe Christie NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
| | - Clare Hart
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation TrustLiverpoolUK
| | - Ehab Ibrahim
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation TrustLiverpoolUK
| | - Jamie McClelland
- Department of Medical Physics and BioengineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Marc Rea
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation TrustLiverpoolUK
| | - Louise Turtle
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation TrustLiverpoolUK
| | - John D. Fenwick
- Department of Medical Physics and BioengineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tekatli H, Palacios MA, Schneiders FL, Haasbeek CJA, Slotman BJ, Lagerwaard FJ, Senan S. Local control and toxicity after magnetic resonance imaging (MR)-guided single fraction lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2023; 187:109823. [PMID: 37516364 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Magnetic resonance imaging (MR)-guided radiotherapy permits continuous intrafraction visualization and use of automatic triggered beam delivery, with use of smaller planning target volumes (PTV). We report on long-term clinical outcomes following MR-guided single fraction (SF) lung SABR on a 0.35 T linac. MATERIALS AND METHODS Details of patients treated with SF-SABR for lung tumors were accessed from an ethics approved institutional database. A breath-hold 3D MR simulation scan was performed using a true FISP sequence, followed by a breath-hold 3D CT scan. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was first contoured on the breath-hold CT scan, which was then compared with contours on the 3D MR scan, before the GTV was finalized. SABR plans used step-and-shoot IMRT beams to a PTV derived by adding a 5 mm margin to the breath-hold GTV, and a 3 mm gating window was used. SABR was delivered during repeated breath-holds, using automatic beam gating with continuous visualization of the GTV in a sagittal MR plane. RESULTS Between 2018-2022, 50 consecutive patients were treated, and 69% had a primary non-small cell lung cancer. Median PTV was 11.2 cc (range 3.9-53.5); 80% of GTV's were located ≤2.5 cm from the chest wall. Prescribed doses were 34 Gy (in 58%), 30 Gy (32%), or between 20-28 Gy (10%). After a median follow-up of 18.1 months (95% CI 12.8-23.5), the 2-year survival was 82% (89% for primary NSCLC and 62% for metastases). After a median follow-up of 16.1 months (95% CI 11.2-21.1), local recurrences developed in 2 patients (4%). The 3-year local control rate was 97%, and just 1 patient developed grade ≥3 toxicity (chest wall pain). CONCLUSION MR-guided SF-SABR delivery to lung tumors on a 0.35 T linac, using repeated breath-holds with automatic beam gating, achieves good tumor control and low toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilâl Tekatli
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Miguel A Palacios
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Famke L Schneiders
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Haasbeek
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ben J Slotman
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frank J Lagerwaard
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Suresh Senan
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dei D, Lambri N, Stefanini S, Vernier V, Brioso RC, Crespi L, Clerici E, Bellu L, De Philippis C, Loiacono D, Navarria P, Reggiori G, Bramanti S, Rodari M, Tomatis S, Chiti A, Carlo-Stella C, Scorsetti M, Mancosu P. Internal Guidelines for Reducing Lymph Node Contour Variability in Total Marrow and Lymph Node Irradiation. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051536. [PMID: 36900326 PMCID: PMC10000500 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The total marrow and lymph node irradiation (TMLI) target includes the bones, spleen, and lymph node chains, with the latter being the most challenging structures to contour. We evaluated the impact of introducing internal contour guidelines to reduce the inter- and intraobserver lymph node delineation variability in TMLI treatments. METHODS A total of 10 patients were randomly selected from our database of 104 TMLI patients so as to evaluate the guidelines' efficacy. The lymph node clinical target volume (CTV_LN) was recontoured according to the guidelines (CTV_LN_GL_RO1) and compared to the historical guidelines (CTV_LN_Old). Both topological (i.e., Dice similarity coefficient (DSC)) and dosimetric (i.e., V95 (the volume receiving 95% of the prescription dose) metrics were calculated for all paired contours. RESULTS The mean DSCs were 0.82 ± 0.09, 0.97 ± 0.01, and 0.98 ± 0.02, respectively, for CTV_LN_Old vs. CTV_LN_GL_RO1, and between the inter- and intraobserver contours following the guidelines. Correspondingly, the mean CTV_LN-V95 dose differences were 4.8 ± 4.7%, 0.03 ± 0.5%, and 0.1 ± 0.1%. CONCLUSIONS The guidelines reduced the CTV_LN contour variability. The high target coverage agreement revealed that historical CTV-to-planning-target-volume margins were safe, even if a relatively low DSC was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damiano Dei
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Lambri
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence: (N.L.); (S.T.)
| | - Sara Stefanini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Veronica Vernier
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Ricardo Coimbra Brioso
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Crespi
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
- Health Data Science Centre, Human Technopole, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Clerici
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Luisa Bellu
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara De Philippis
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Loiacono
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Reggiori
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Bramanti
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Marcello Rodari
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence: (N.L.); (S.T.)
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Carmelo Carlo-Stella
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Mancosu
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Klaassen L, Jaarsma-Coes MG, Verbist BM, Vu TK, Marinkovic M, Rasch CR, Luyten GP, Beenakker JWM. Automatic Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance-based measurements of tumour prominence and basal diameter for treatment planning of uveal melanoma. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 24:102-110. [PMID: 36386446 PMCID: PMC9649381 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Three-dimensional (3D) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to complement conventional two-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of tumour dimension measurement of uveal melanoma. However, the lack of definitions of the 3D measurements of these tumour dimensions hinders further adaptation of MRI in ocular radiotherapy planning. In this study, we composed 3D MR-based definitions of tumour prominence and basal diameter and compared them to conventional ultrasound. Materials and methods Tumours were delineated on 3DT2 and contrast-enhanced 3DT1 (T1gd) MRI for 25 patients. 3D definitions of tumour prominence and diameter were composed and evaluated automatically on the T1gd and T2 contours. Automatic T1gd measurements were compared to manual MRI measurements, to automatic T2 measurements and to manual ultrasound measurements. Results Prominence measurements were similar for all modalities (median absolute difference 0.3 mm). Automatic T1gd diameter measurements were generally larger than manual MRI, automatic T2 and manual ultrasound measurements (median absolute differences of 0.5, 1.6 and 1.1 mm respectively), mainly due to difficulty defining the axis of the largest diameter. Largest differences between ultrasound and MRI for both prominence and diameter were found in anteriorly located tumours (up to 1.6 and 4.5 mm respectively), for which the tumour extent could not entirely be visualized with ultrasound. Conclusions The proposed 3D definitions for tumour prominence and diameter agreed well with ultrasound measurements for tumours for which the extent was visible on ultrasound. 3D MRI measurements generally provided larger diameter measurements than ultrasound. In anteriorly located tumours, the MRI measurements were considered more accurate than conventional ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Klaassen
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Myriam G. Jaarsma-Coes
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Berit M. Verbist
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
- Holland Particle Therapy Center, PO Box 110, 2600 AC Delft, the Netherlands
| | - T.H. Khanh Vu
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marina Marinkovic
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Coen R.N. Rasch
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
- Holland Particle Therapy Center, PO Box 110, 2600 AC Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Gregorius P.M. Luyten
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jan-Willem M. Beenakker
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|