1
|
Fleury E, Pignol JP, Kiliç E, Milder M, van Rij C, Naus N, Yavuzyigitoglu S, den Toom W, Zolnay A, Spruijt K, van Vulpen M, Trnková P, Hoogeman M. Comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and protons for uveal melanoma patients. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 31:100605. [PMID: 39050744 PMCID: PMC11268348 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary ocular malignancy. We compared fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with proton therapy, including toxicity risks for UM patients. Materials and methods For a total of 66 UM patients from a single center, SRT dose distributions were compared to protons using the same planning CT. Fourteen dose-volume parameters were compared in 2-Gy equivalent dose per fraction (EQD2). Four toxicity profiles were evaluated: maculopathy, optic-neuropathy, visual acuity impairment (Profile I); neovascular glaucoma (Profile II); radiation-induced retinopathy (Profile III); and dry-eye syndrome (Profile IV). For Profile III, retina Mercator maps were generated to visualize the geographical location of dose differences. Results In 9/66 cases, (14 %) proton plans were superior for all dose-volume parameters. Higher T stages benefited more from protons in Profile I, especially tumors located within 3 mm or less from the optic nerve. In Profile II, only 9/66 cases resulted in a better proton plan. In Profile III, better retina volume sparing was always achievable with protons, with a larger gain for T3 tumors. In Profile IV, protons always reduced the risk of toxicity with a median RBE-weighted EQD2 reduction of 15.3 Gy. Conclusions This study reports the first side-by-side imaging-based planning comparison between protons and SRT for UM patients. Globally, while protons appear almost always better regarding the risk of optic-neuropathy, retinopathy and dry-eye syndrome, for other toxicity like neovascular glaucoma, a plan comparison is warranted. Choice would depend on the prioritization of risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Fleury
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Emine Kiliç
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Clinical Genetics, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike Milder
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline van Rij
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole Naus
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wilhelm den Toom
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andras Zolnay
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Petra Trnková
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mischa Hoogeman
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Knäusl B, Langgartner L, Stock M, Janson M, Furutani KM, Beltran CJ, Georg D, Resch AF. Requirements for dose calculation on an active scanned proton beamline for small, shallow fields. Phys Med 2023; 113:102659. [PMID: 37598612 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A growing interest in using proton pencil beam scanning in combination with collimators for the treatment of small, shallow targets, such as ocular melanoma or pre-clinical research emerged recently. This study aims at demonstrating that the dose of a synchrotron-based PBS system with a dedicated small, shallow field nozzle can be accurately predicted by a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) following appropriate tuning of both, nozzle and TPS. MATERIALS A removable extension to the clinical nozzle was developed to modify the beam shape passively. Five circular apertures with diameters between 5 to 34mm, mounted 72cm downstream of a range shifter were used. For each collimator treatment plans with spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBP) with a modulation of 3 to 30mm were measured and calculated with GATE/Geant4 and the research TPS RayStation (RS11B-R). The dose grid, multiple coulomb scattering and block discretization resolution were varied to find the optimal balance between accuracy and performance. RESULTS For SOBPs deeper than 10mm, the dose in the target agreed within 1% between RS11B-R, GATE/Geant4 and measurements for aperture diameters between 8 to 34mm, but deviated up to 5% for smaller apertures. A plastic taper was introduced reducing scatter contributions to the patient (from the pipe) and improving the dose calculation accuracy of the TPS to a 5% level in the entrance region for large apertures. CONCLUSION The commercial TPS and GATE/Geant4 can accurately calculate the dose for shallow, small proton fields using a collimator and pencil beam scanning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Knäusl
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria; MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
| | - L Langgartner
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Stock
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria; Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria
| | - M Janson
- RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - K M Furutani
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| | - C J Beltran
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| | - D Georg
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - A F Resch
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria; MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jaarsma-Coes MG, Ferreira TA, Marinkovic M, Vu THK, van Vught L, van Haren GR, Rodrigues MF, Klaver YLB, Verbist BM, Luyten GPM, Rasch CRN, Beenakker JWM. Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based and Conventional Measurements for Proton Beam Therapy of Uveal Melanoma. Ophthalmol Retina 2023; 7:178-188. [PMID: 35840053 DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2022.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Conventionally, ocular proton therapy (PT) is planned using measurements obtained by an ophthalmologist using ultrasound, fundoscopy, biometry, and intraoperative assessments. Owing to the recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of uveal melanoma (UM), it is possible to acquire high-resolution 3-dimensional images of the eye, providing the opportunity to incorporate MRI in ocular PT planning. In this study, we described how these measurements can be obtained using MRI, compared the MRI-based measurements with conventional ophthalmic measurements, and identified potential pitfalls for both modalities. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS Data from 23 consecutive patients with UM treated with PT were retrospectively evaluated. METHODS Magnetic resonance imaging-based measurements of axial length, tumor height and basal diameter, and marker-tumor distances were compared with the conventional ophthalmic measurements, and discrepancies were evaluated in a multidisciplinary setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Tumor prominence and basal diameters on MRI and ultrasound, axial length on MRI and biometry, tumor-marker distances on MRI and measured intraoperatively. RESULTS The mean absolute differences of the tumor height and basal diameter measurements between ultrasound and MRI were 0.57 mm and 1.44 mm, respectively. Larger absolute differences in height and basal diameter were observed when the full tumor extent was not visible on ultrasound (0.92 mm and 1.67 mm, respectively) compared with when the full tumor extent was visible (0.44 mm and 1.15 mm, respectively). When the full tumor was not visible on ultrasound, MRI was considered more reliable. Tumor-marker distances measured using MRI and intraoperative techniques differed < 1 mm in 55% of the markers. For anteriorly located and mushroom-shaped tumors (25% of the markers), MRI provided more accurate measurements. In flat UM (15% of the markers), however, it was difficult to delineate the tumor on MRI. The mean absolute difference in axial length between optical biometry and MRI was 0.50 mm. The presence of the tumor was found to influence optical biometry in 15 of 22 patients; the remaining patients showed a better agreement (0.30 mm). Magnetic resonance imaging-based biometry was considered more reliable in patients with UM. CONCLUSIONS Magnetic resonance imaging allowed for the 3-dimensional assessment of the tumor and surrounding tissue. In specific patients, it provided a more reliable measurement of axial length, tumor dimensions, and marker-tumor distances and could contribute to a more accurate treatment planning. Nevertheless, a combined evaluation remains advised, especially for flat UM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myriam G Jaarsma-Coes
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Teresa A Ferreira
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marina Marinkovic
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - T H Khanh Vu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Luc van Vught
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Guido R van Haren
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Myra F Rodrigues
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne L B Klaver
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Berit M Verbist
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Gregorius P M Luyten
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Coen R N Rasch
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Willem M Beenakker
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Palladium-103 plaque brachytherapy for retinoblastoma: Long term follow up. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2022; 27:101636. [PMID: 35800402 PMCID: PMC9254334 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Radiation has been used in the treatment of retinoblastoma. Herein, we present the novel use of palladium-103 plaque brachytherapy as primary treatment. Observation An 8-year-old asymptomatic girl presented was found to have a solitary peripheral retinoblastoma in her right eye. She was treated with primary palladium-103 plaque brachytherapy (47.4 Gray over 5 consecutive days). A secondary, vitreous hemorrhage noted 46 months after irradiation was successfully controlled by laser tumor-demarcation. With 19-years follow up, there has been no clinical scleropathy, or local tumor recurrence. The eye yields 20/20 vision and there has been no systemic metastasis. Conclusion and importance Palladium-103 plaque brachytherapy successfully controlled retinoblastoma, while preserving the globe, vision, and life.
Collapse
|