1
|
McGee KP, Cao M, Das IJ, Yu V, Witte RJ, Kishan AU, Valle LF, Wiesinger F, De-Colle C, Cao Y, Breen WG, Traughber BJ. The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Radiation Therapy Treatment Simulation and Planning. J Magn Reson Imaging 2024; 60:1786-1805. [PMID: 38265188 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Ever since its introduction as a diagnostic imaging tool the potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiation therapy (RT) treatment simulation and planning has been recognized. Recent technical advances have addressed many of the impediments to use of this technology and as a result have resulted in rapid and growing adoption of MRI in RT. The purpose of this article is to provide a broad review of the multiple uses of MR in the RT treatment simulation and planning process, identify several of the most used clinical scenarios in which MR is integral to the simulation and planning process, highlight existing limitations and provide multiple unmet needs thereby highlighting opportunities for the diagnostic MR imaging community to contribute and collaborate with our oncology colleagues. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiaran P McGee
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic & Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Indra J Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Victoria Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert J Witte
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic & Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Luca F Valle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Chiara De-Colle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Yue Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic & Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Bryan J Traughber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic & Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aljaafari L, Bird D, Buckley DL, Al-Qaisieh B, Speight R. A systematic review of 4D magnetic resonance imaging techniques for abdominal radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 31:100604. [PMID: 39071158 PMCID: PMC11283022 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4DMRI) has gained interest as an alternative to the current standard for motion management four-dimensional tomography (4DCT) in abdominal radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP). This review aims to assess the 4DMRI literature in abdomen, focusing on technical considerations and the validity of using 4DMRI for patients within radiotherapy protocols. Materials and methods The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed across the Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, covering all years up to December 31, 2023. The studies were grouped into two categories: 4DMRI reconstructed from 3DMRI acquisition; and 4DMRI reconstructed from multi-slice 2DMRI acquisition. Results A total of 39 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed to provide key findings. Key findings were 4DMRI had the potential to improve abdominal RTP for patients by providing accurate tumour definition and motion assessment compared to 4DCT. 4DMRI reconstructed from 3DMRI acquisition showed promise as a feasible approach for motion management in abdominal RTP regarding spatial resolution. Currently,the slice thickness achieved on 4DMRI reconstructed from multi-slice 2DMRI acquisitions was unsuitable for clinical purposes. Lastly, the current barriers for clinical implementation of 4DMRI were the limited availability of validated commercial solutions and the lack of larger cohort comparative studies to 4DCT for target delineation and plan optimisation. Conclusion 4DMRI showed potential improvements in abdominal RTP, but standards and guidelines for the use of 4DMRI in radiotherapy were required to demonstrate clinical benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lamyaa Aljaafari
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
- King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Department of Diagnostic Radiology Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Alahssa, Saudi Arabia
| | - David Bird
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| | - David L. Buckley
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
| | - Bashar Al-Qaisieh
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Speight
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu D, Miao X, Liu H, Scholey JE, Yang W, Feng M, Ohliger M, Lin H, Lao Y, Yang Y, Sheng K. Paired conditional generative adversarial network for highly accelerated liver 4D MRI. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:10.1088/1361-6560/ad5489. [PMID: 38838679 PMCID: PMC11212820 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad5489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
Purpose.4D MRI with high spatiotemporal resolution is desired for image-guided liver radiotherapy. Acquiring densely sampling k-space data is time-consuming. Accelerated acquisition with sparse samples is desirable but often causes degraded image quality or long reconstruction time. We propose the Reconstruct Paired Conditional Generative Adversarial Network (Re-Con-GAN) to shorten the 4D MRI reconstruction time while maintaining the reconstruction quality.Methods.Patients who underwent free-breathing liver 4D MRI were included in the study. Fully- and retrospectively under-sampled data at 3, 6 and 10 times (3×, 6× and 10×) were first reconstructed using the nuFFT algorithm. Re-Con-GAN then trained input and output in pairs. Three types of networks, ResNet9, UNet and reconstruction swin transformer (RST), were explored as generators. PatchGAN was selected as the discriminator. Re-Con-GAN processed the data (3D +t) as temporal slices (2D +t). A total of 48 patients with 12 332 temporal slices were split into training (37 patients with 10 721 slices) and test (11 patients with 1611 slices). Compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction with spatiotemporal sparsity constraint was used as a benchmark. Reconstructed image quality was further evaluated with a liver gross tumor volume (GTV) localization task using Mask-RCNN trained from a separate 3D static liver MRI dataset (70 patients; 103 GTV contours).Results.Re-Con-GAN consistently achieved comparable/better PSNR, SSIM, and RMSE scores compared to CS/UNet models. The inference time of Re-Con-GAN, UNet and CS are 0.15, 0.16, and 120 s. The GTV detection task showed that Re-Con-GAN and CS, compared to UNet, better improved the dice score (3× Re-Con-GAN 80.98%; 3× CS 80.74%; 3× UNet 79.88%) of unprocessed under-sampled images (3× 69.61%).Conclusion.A generative network with adversarial training is proposed with promising and efficient reconstruction results demonstrated on an in-house dataset. The rapid and qualitative reconstruction of 4D liver MR has the potential to facilitate online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy for liver cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Hengjie Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Jessica E. Scholey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Wensha Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Mary Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Michael Ohliger
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Hui Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Yi Lao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang H, Zheng X, Sun J, Zhu X, Dong D, Du Y, Feng Z, Gong J, Wu H, Geng J, Li S, Song M, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Cai Y, Li Y, Wang W. 4D-MRI assisted stereotactic body radiation therapy for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100714. [PMID: 38130885 PMCID: PMC10733695 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2023] [Revised: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
This study evaluated the feasibilities and outcomes following four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4D-MRI) assisted stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). From March 2018 to January 2022, we identified 76 unresectable CRLMs patients with 123 lesions who received 4D-MRI guided SBRT in our institution. 4D-MRI simulation with or without abdominal compression was conducted for all patients. The prescription dose was 50-65 Gy in 5-12 fractions. The image quality of computed tomography (CT) and MRI were compared using the Clarity Score. Clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles were evaluated. 4D-MRI improved the image quality compared with CT images (mean Clarity Score: 1.67 vs 2.88, P < 0.001). The abdominal compression reduced motions in cranial-caudal direction (P = 0.03) with two phase T2 weighted images assessing tumor motion. The median follow-up time was 12.5 months. For 98 lesions assessed for best response, the complete response, partial response and stable disease rate were 57.1 %, 30.6 % and 12.2 %, respectively. The local control (LC) rate at 1 year was 97.3 %. 46.1 % of patients experienced grade 1-2 toxicities and only 2.6 % patients experienced grade 3 hematologic toxicities. The 4D-MRI technique allowed accurate target delineation and motion tracking in unresectable CRLMs patients. Favorable LC rate and mild toxicities were achieved. This study provided evidence for using 4D-MRI assisted SBRT as an alternative treatment in unresectable CRLMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Xianggao Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Dezuo Dong
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Yi Du
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Zhongsu Feng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Jian Gong
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Hao Wu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Jianhao Geng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Shuai Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Maxiaowei Song
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Yangzi Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Zhiyan Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Yong Cai
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Yongheng Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Weihu Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tadimalla S, Wang W, Haworth A. Role of Functional MRI in Liver SBRT: Current Use and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235860. [PMID: 36497342 PMCID: PMC9739660 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment for liver cancers whereby large doses of radiation can be delivered precisely to target lesions in 3-5 fractions. The target dose is limited by the dose that can be safely delivered to the non-tumour liver, which depends on the baseline liver functional reserve. Current liver SBRT guidelines assume uniform liver function in the non-tumour liver. However, the assumption of uniform liver function is false in liver disease due to the presence of cirrhosis, damage due to previous chemo- or ablative therapies or irradiation, and fatty liver disease. Anatomical information from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used for SBRT planning. While its current use is limited to the identification of target location and size, functional MRI techniques also offer the ability to quantify and spatially map liver tissue microstructure and function. This review summarises and discusses the advantages offered by functional MRI methods for SBRT treatment planning and the potential for adaptive SBRT workflows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sirisha Tadimalla
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
- Correspondence:
| | - Wei Wang
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Annette Haworth
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|