Online adaptive radiotherapy of anal cancer: Normal tissue sparing, target propagation methods, and first clinical experience

Safety and Efficiency Analysis of Operational Decision-Making During Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Based Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) is especially beneficial for patients with large interfractional anatomic changes. However, treatment planning and review decisions need to be made at the treatment console in real-time and may be delegated to clinical staff whose conventional scope of practice does not include making such decisions. Therefore, implementation can create new safety risks and inefficiencies. The objective of this work is to systematically analyze the safety and efficiency implications of human decision-making during the treatment session for CBCT-based online ART.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The analysis was performed by applying the Systems-Theoretical Process Analysis technique and its extension for human decision-making. Four centers of different CBCT-based online ART practice models comprised the analysis team.

RESULTS

The general radiation therapy control structure was refined to model the interactions between routine treatment delivery staff and in-person or remote support staff. The treatment delivery staff perform 6 key control actions. Eighteen undesirable states of those control actions were identified as affecting safety and/or efficiency. In turn, 97 hazardous clinical scenarios were identified, with the control action "prepare and position patient" having the least number of scenarios and "delineate/edit influencer and target structures" having the most. Five of these are specific to either in-person or remote support during the treatment session, and 12 arise from staff support in general.

CONCLUSIONS

An optimally safe and efficient online ART program should require little to no support staff at the treatment console to reduce staff coordination. Uptraining of the staff already at the treatment console is needed to achieve this goal. Beyond the essential knowledge and skills such as contour editing and the selection of an optimal plan, uptraining should also target the specific cognitive biases identified in this work and the cognitive strategies to overcome these biases. Additionally, technological and organizational changes are necessary.

Daily Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy of Postoperative Endometrial and Cervical Cancer With PTV Margin Reduction to 5 mm: Dosimetric Outcomes, Acute Toxicity, and First Clinical Experience

Purpose

This study evaluated the first clinical implementation of daily iterative cone beam computed tomography (iCBCT)-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) in the postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer.

Methods and Materials

Seventeen consecutive patients treated with daily iCBCT-guided oART were enrolled in this prospective study, with a reduced uniform 3-dimensional PTV margin of 5 mm. Treatment plans were designed to deliver 45 or 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions to PTV. Pre- and posttreatment ultrasound and iCBCT scans were performed to record intrafractional bladder and rectal volume changes. The accuracy of contouring, oART procedure time, dosimetric outcomes, and acute toxicity were evaluated.

Results

The average time from first iCBCT acquisition to completion of treatment was 22 minutes and 26 seconds. During this period, bladder volume increased by 44 cm3 using iCBCT contouring, whereas rectal volume remained stable (62.9 cm3 pretreatment vs 61.9 cm3 posttreatment). A total of 91.6% of influencers and 88.1% of CTVs required no or minor edits. The adapted plan was selected in all (434) fractions and significantly improved the dosimetry coverage for CTV and PTV, especially the vaginal PTV coverage by nearly 7% (P < .05). The adapted bladder Dmean was 104.61 cGy, and the rectum Dmean was 123.67 cGy, significantly lower than the scheduled plan of 108.24 and 128.19 cGy, respectively. The bone marrow and femur head left and right dosimetry were also improved with adaptation. Grade 2 acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were 24% and 0, respectively. There was a grade 3 acute toxicity of decreased white blood cell count in 1 patient.

Conclusions

Daily oART was associated with favorable dosimetry improvement and low acute toxicity, supporting its safety and efficacy for postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer. These results need to be validated in a larger prospective randomized controlled cohort.

Unlocking the adaptive advantage: correlation and machine learning classification to identify optimal online adaptive stereotactic partial breast candidates

Objective.Online adaptive radiotherapy (OART) is a promising technique for delivering stereotactic accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), as lumpectomy cavities vary in location and size between simulation and treatment. However, OART is resource-intensive, increasing planning and treatment times and decreasing machine throughput compared to the standard of care (SOC). Thus, it is pertinent to identify high-yield OART candidates to best allocate resources.Approach.Reference plans (plans based on simulation anatomy), SOC plans (reference plans recalculated onto daily anatomy), and daily adaptive plans were analyzed for 31 sequential APBI targets, resulting in the analysis of 333 treatment plans. Spearman correlations between 22 reference plan metrics and 10 adaptive benefits, defined as the difference between mean SOC and delivered metrics, were analyzed to select a univariate predictor of OART benefit. A multivariate logistic regression model was then trained to stratify high- and low-benefit candidates.Main results.Adaptively delivered plans showed dosimetric benefit as compared to SOC plans for most plan metrics, although the degree of adaptive benefit varied per patient. The univariate model showed high likelihood for dosimetric adaptive benefit when the reference plan ipsilateral breast V15Gy exceeds 23.5%. Recursive feature elimination identified 5 metrics that predict high-dosimetric-benefit adaptive patients. Using leave-one-out cross validation, the univariate and multivariate models classified targets with 74.2% and 83.9% accuracy, resulting in improvement in per-fraction adaptive benefit between targets identified as high- and low-yield for 7/10 and 8/10 plan metrics, respectively.Significance.This retrospective, exploratory study demonstrated that dosimetric benefit can be predicted using only ipsilateral breast V15Gy on the reference treatment plan, allowing for a simple, interpretable model. Using multivariate logistic regression for adaptive benefit prediction led to increased accuracy at the cost of a more complicated model. This work presents a methodology for clinics wishing to triage OART resource allocation.

ROAR-A: re-optimization based Online Adaptive Radiotherapy of anal cancer, a prospective phase II trial protocol

BACKGROUND

Chemo-radiotherapy with curative intent for anal cancer has high complete remission rates, but acute treatment-related gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity is significant. Toxicity occurs due to irradiation of surrounding normal tissue. Current radiotherapy requires the addition of large planning margins to the radiation field to ensure target coverage regardless of the considerable organ motion in the pelvic region. This increases the irradiated volume and radiation dose to the surrounding normal tissue and thereby toxicity. Online adaptive radiotherapy uses artificial intelligence to adjust the treatment to the anatomy of the day. This allows for the reduction of planning margins, minimizing the irradiated volume and thereby radiation to the surrounding normal tissue.This study examines if cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided oART with daily automated treatment re-planning can reduce acute gastrointestinal toxicity in patients with anal cancer.

METHODS/DESIGN

The study is a prospective, single-arm, phase II trial conducted at Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark. 205 patients with local only or locally advanced anal cancer, referred for radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy with curative intent, are planned for inclusion. Toxicity and quality of life are reported with Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events and patient-reported outcome questionnaires, before, during, and after treatment. The primary endpoint is a reduction in the incidence of acute treatment-related grade ≥ 2 diarrhea from 36 to 25% after daily online adaptive radiotherapy compared to standard radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints include all acute and late toxicity, overall survival, and reduction in treatment interruptions.

RESULTS

Accrual began in January 2022 and is expected to finish in January 2026. Primary endpoint results are expected to be available in April 2026.

DISCUSSION

This is the first study utilizing online adaptive radiotherapy to treat anal cancer. We hope to determine whether there is a clinical benefit for the patients, with significant reductions in acute GI toxicity without compromising treatment efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05438836. Danish Ethical Committee: H-21028093.

Enhancing Safety in AI-Driven Cone Beam CT-based Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy: Development and Implementation of an Interdisciplinary Workflow

Purpose

The emerging online adaptive radiation therapy (OART) treatment strategy based on cone beam computed tomography allows for real-time replanning according to a patient's current anatomy. However, implementing this procedure requires a new approach across the patient's care path and monitoring of the "black box" adaptation process. This study identifies high-risk failure modes (FMs) associated with AI-driven OART and proposes an interdisciplinary workflow to mitigate potential medical errors from highly automated processes, enhance treatment efficiency, and reduce the burden on clinicians.

Methods and Materials

An interdisciplinary working group was formed to identify safety concerns in each process step using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). Based on the FMEA results, the team designed standardized procedures and safety checklists to prevent errors and ensure successful task completion. The Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) for the top twenty FMs were calculated before and after implementing the proposed workflow to evaluate its effectiveness. Three hundred seventy-four adaptive sessions across 5 treatment sites were performed, and each session was evaluated for treatment safety and FMEA assessment.

Results

The OART workflow has 4 components, each with 4, 8, 13, and 4 sequentially executed tasks and safety checklists. Site-specific template preparation, which includes disease-specific physician directives and Intelligent Optimization Engine template testing, is one of the new procedures introduced. The interdisciplinary workflow significantly reduced the RPNs of the high-risk FMs, with an average decrease of 110 (maximum reduction of 305.5 and minimum reduction of 27.4).

Conclusions

This study underscores the importance of addressing high-risk FMs associated with AI-driven OART and emphasizes the significance of safety measures in its implementation. By proposing a structured interdisciplinary workflow and integrated checklists, the study provides valuable insights into ensuring the safe and efficient delivery of OART while facilitating its effective integration into clinical practice.

Evaluating contouring accuracy and dosimetry impact of current MRI-guided adaptive radiation therapy for brain metastases: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) has gained increasing attention, showing clinical advantages over conventional radiotherapy. However, there are concerns regarding online target delineation and modification accuracy. In our study, we aimed to investigate the accuracy of brain metastases (BMs) contouring and its impact on dosimetry in 1.5 T MRI-guided online adaptive fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT).

METHODS

Eighteen patients with 64 BMs were retrospectively evaluated. Pre-treatment 3.0 T MRI scans (gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1w, T1c) and initial 1.5 T MR-Linac scans (non-enhanced online-T1, T2, and FLAIR) were used for gross target volume (GTV) contouring. Five radiation oncologists independently contoured GTVs on pre-treatment T1c and initial online-T1, T2, and FLAIR images. We assessed intra-observer and inter-observer variations and analysed the dosimetry impact through treatment planning based on GTVs generated by online MRI, simulating the current online adaptive radiotherapy practice.

RESULTS

The average Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) for inter-observer comparison were 0.79, 0.54, 0.59, and 0.64 for pre-treatment T1c, online-T1, T2, and FLAIR, respectively. Inter-observer variations were significantly smaller for the 3.0 T pre-treatment T1c than for the contrast-free online 1.5 T MR scans (P < 0.001). Compared to the T1c contours, the average DSC index of intra-observer contouring was 0.52‒0.55 for online MRIs. For BMs larger than 3 cm3, visible on all image sets, the average DSC indices were 0.69, 0.71 and 0.64 for online-T1, T2, and FLAIR, respectively, compared to the pre-treatment T1c contour. For BMs < 3 cm3, the average visibility rates were 22.3%, 41.3%, and 51.8% for online-T1, T2, and FLAIR, respectively. Simulated adaptive planning showed an average prescription dose coverage of 63.4‒66.9% when evaluated by ground truth planning target volumes (PTVs) generated on pre-treatment T1c, reducing it from over 99% coverage by PTVs generated on online MRIs.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of online target contouring was unsatisfactory for the current MRI-guided online adaptive FSRT. Small lesions had poor visibility on 1.5 T non-contrast-enhanced MR-Linac images. Contour inaccuracies caused a one-third drop in prescription dose coverage for the target volume. Future studies should explore the feasibility of contrast agent administration during daily treatment in MRI-guided online adaptive FSRT procedures.

Improved Dosimetry and Plan Quality for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy: A Single Institutional Study

Purpose

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an attractive treatment modality for eligible patients as it has been shown to result in similar local control and improved cosmetic outcomes compared with whole breast radiation therapy. The use of online adaptive radiation therapy (OART) for APBI is promising as it allows for a reduction of planning target volume margins because breast motion and lumpectomy cavity volume changes are accounted for in daily imaging. Here we present a retrospective, single-institution evaluation on the adequacy of kV-cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) OART for APBI treatments.

Methods and Materials

Nineteen patients (21 treatment sites) were treated to 30 Gy in 5 fractions between January of 2022 and May of 2023. Time between simulation and treatment, change in gross tumor (ie, lumpectomy cavity) volume, and differences in dose volume histogram metrics with adaption were analyzed. The Wilcoxon paired, nonparametric test was used to test for dose volume histogram metric differences between the scheduled plans (initial plans recalculated on daily CBCT anatomy) and delivered plans, either the scheduled or adapted plan, which was reoptimized using daily anatomy.

Results

Median (interquartile range) time from simulation to first treatment was 26 days (21-32 days). During this same time, median gross tumor volume reduction was 16.0% (7.3%-23.9%) relative to simulation volume. Adaptive treatments took 31.3 minutes (27.4-36.6 minutes) from start of CBCT to treatment session end. At treatment, the adaptive plan was selected for 86% (89/103) of evaluable fractions. In evaluating plan quality, 78% of delivered plans met all target, organs at risk, and conformity metrics evaluated, compared with 34% of scheduled plans.

Conclusions

Use of OART for stereotactic linac-based APBI allowed for safe, high-quality treatments in this cohort of 21 treatment courses. Although treatment delivery times were longer than traditional stereotactic body treatments, there were notable improvements in plan quality for APBI using OART.

Simulation and pre-planning omitted radiotherapy (SPORT): a feasibility study for prostate cancer

This study explored the feasibility of on-couch intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning for prostate cancer (PCa) on a cone-beam CT (CBCT)-based online adaptive RT platform without an individualized pre-treatment plan and contours. Ten patients with PCa previously treated with image-guided IMRT (60 Gy/20 fractions) were selected. In contrast to the routine online adaptive RT workflow, a novel approach was employed in which the same preplan that was optimized on one reference patient was adapted to generate individual on-couch/initial plans for the other nine test patients using Ethos emulator. Simulation CTs of the test patients were used as simulated online CBCT (sCBCT) for emulation. Quality assessments were conducted on synthetic CTs (sCT). Dosimetric comparisons were performed between on-couch plans, on-couch plans recomputed on the sCBCT and individually optimized plans for test patients. The median value of mean absolute difference between sCT and sCBCT was 74.7 HU (range 69.5-91.5 HU). The average CTV/PTV coverage by prescription dose was 100.0%/94.7%, and normal tissue constraints were met for the nine test patients in on-couch plans on sCT. Recalculating on-couch plans on the sCBCT showed about 0.7% reduction of PTV coverage and a 0.6% increasing of hotspot, and the dose difference of the OARs was negligible (<0.5 Gy). Hence, initial IMRT plans for new patients can be generated by adapting a reference patient's preplan with online contours, which had similar qualities to the conventional approach of individually optimized plan on the simulation CT. Further study is needed to identify selection criteria for patient anatomy most amenable to this workflow.

Prospects for daily online adaptive radiotherapy for cervical cancer: Auto-contouring evaluation and dosimetric outcomes

BACKGROUND

Training senior radiation therapists as "adapters" to manage influencers and target editing is critical in daily online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) for cervical cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and dosimetric outcomes of automatic contouring and identify the key areas for modification.

METHODS

A total of 125 oART fractions from five postoperative cervical cancer patients and 140 oART fractions from five uterine cervical cancer patients treated with daily iCBCT-guided oART were enrolled in this prospective study. The same adaptive treatments were replanned using the Ethos automatic contours workflow without manual contouring edits. The clinical target volume (CTV) was subdivided into several separate regions, and the average surface distance dice (ASD), centroid deviation, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and 95% Hausdorff distance (95% HD) were used to evaluate contouring for the above portions. Dosimetric results from automatic oART plans were compared to supervised oART plans to evaluate target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) dose changes.

RESULTS

Overall, the paired CTV had high overlap rates, with an average DSC value greater than 0.75. The uterus had the largest consistency differences, with ASD, centroid deviation, and 95% HD being 2.67 ± 1.79 mm, 17.17 ± 12 mm, and 10.45 ± 5.68 mm, respectively. The consistency differences of the lower nodal CTVleft and nodal CTVright were relatively large, with ASD, centroid deviation, and 95% HD being 0.59 ± 0.53 mm, 3.6 ± 2.67 mm, and 5.41 ± 4.08 mm, and 0.59 ± 0.51 mm, 3.6 ± 2.54 mm, and 4.7 ± 1.57 mm, respectively. The automatic online-adapted plan met the clinical requirements of dosimetric coverage for the target volume and improved the OAR dosimetry.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of automatic contouring from the Ethos adaptive platform is considered clinically acceptable for cervical cancer, and the uterus, upper vaginal cuff, and lower nodal CTV are the areas that need to be focused on in training.

Evaluation of PTV margins with daily iterative online adaptive radiotherapy for postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer: a prospective single-arm phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

To determine the optimal planning target volume (PTV) margins for adequate coverage by daily iterative cone-beam computed tomography (iCBCT)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) in postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer and the benefit of reducing PTV margins.

METHODS

Fifteen postoperative endometrial and cervical cancer patients treated with daily iCBCT-guided oART were enrolled in this prospective phase 2 study. Pre- and posttreatment iCBCT images of 125 fractions from 5 patients were obtained as a training cohort, and clinical target volumes (CTV) were contoured separately. Uniform three-dimensional expansions were applied to the PTVpre to assess the minimum margin required to encompass the CTVpost. The dosimetric advantages of the proposed online adaptive margins were compared with conventional margin plans (7-15 mm) using an oART emulator in another cohort of 125 iCBCT scans. A CTV-to-PTV expansion was verified on a validation cohort of 253 fractions from 10 patients, and further margin reduction and acute toxicity were studied.

RESULTS

The average time from pretreatment iCBCT to posttreatment iCBCT was 22 min. A uniform PTV margin of 5 mm could encompass nodal CTVpost in 100% of the fractions (175/175) and vaginal CTVpost in 98% of the fractions (172/175). The margin of 5 mm was verified in our validation cohort, and the nodal PTV margin could be further reduced to 4 mm if ≥ 95% CTV coverage was predicted to be achieved. The adapted plan with a 5 mm margin significantly improved pelvic organ-at-risk dosimetry compared with the conventional margin plan. Grade 3 toxicities were observed in only one patient with leukopenia, and no patients experienced acute urinary toxicity.

CONCLUSION

In the postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer, oART could reduce PTV margins to 5 mm, which significantly decrease the dose to critical organs at risk and potentially lead to a lower incidence of acute toxicity.

The accuracy of artificial intelligence deformed nodal structures in cervical online cone-beam-based adaptive radiotherapy

Background and Purpose

Online cone-beam-based adaptive radiotherapy (ART) adjusts for anatomical changes during external beam radiotherapy. However, limited cone-beam image quality complicates nodal contouring. Despite this challenge, artificial-intelligence guided deformation (AID) can auto-generate nodal contours. Our study investigated the optimal use of such contours in cervical online cone-beam-based ART.

Materials and Methods

From 136 adaptive fractions across 21 cervical cancer patients with nodal disease, we extracted 649 clinically-delivered and AID clinical target volume (CTV) lymph node boost structures. We assessed geometric alignment between AID and clinical CTVs via dice similarity coefficient, and 95% Hausdorff distance, and geometric coverage of clinical CTVs by AID planning target volumes by false positive dice. Coverage of clinical CTVs by AID contour-based plans was evaluated using D100, D95, V100%, and V95%.

Results

Between AID and clinical CTVs, the median dice similarity coefficient was 0.66 and the median 95 % Hausdorff distance was 4.0 mm. The median false positive dice of clinical CTV coverage by AID planning target volumes was 0. The median D100 was 1.00, the median D95 was 1.01, the median V100% was 1.00, and the median V95% was 1.00. Increased nodal volume, fraction number, and daily adaptation were associated with reduced clinical CTV coverage by AID-based plans.

Conclusion

In one of the first reports on pelvic nodal ART, AID-based plans could adequately cover nodal targets. However, physician review is required due to performance variation. Greater attention is needed for larger, daily-adapted nodes further into treatment.

Evaluation of a novel CBCT conversion method implemented in a treatment planning system

BACKGROUND

To evaluate a novel CBCT conversion algorithm for dose calculation implemented in a research version of a treatment planning system (TPS).

METHODS

The algorithm was implemented in a research version of RayStation (v. 11B-DTK, RaySearch, Stockholm, Sweden). CBCTs acquired for each ten head and neck (HN), gynecology (GYN) and lung cancer (LNG) patients were collected and converted using the new algorithm (CBCTc). A bulk density overriding technique implemented in the same version of the TPS was used for comparison (CBCTb). A deformed CT (dCT) was created by using deformable image registration of the planning CT (pCT) to the CBCT to reduce anatomical changes. All treatment plans were recalculated on the pCT, dCT, CBCTc and the CBCTb. The resulting dose distributions were analyzed using the MICE toolkit (NONPIMedical AB Sweden, Umeå) with local gamma analysis, with 1% dose difference and 1 mm distance to agreement criteria. A Wilcoxon paired rank sum test was applied to test the differences in gamma pass rates (GPRs). A p value smaller than 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The GPRs for the CBCTb method were systematically lower compared to the CBCTc method. Using the 10% dose threshold and the dCT as reference the median GPRs were for the CBCTc method were 100% and 99.8% for the HN and GYN cases, respectively. Compared to that the GPRs of the CBCTb method were lower with values of 99.8% and 98.0%, for the HN and GYN cases, respectively. The GPRs of the LNG cases were 99.9% and 97.5% for the CBCTc and CBCTb method, respectively. These differences were statistically significant. The main differences between the dose calculated on the CBCTs and the pCTs were found in regions near air/tissue interfaces, which are also subject to anatomical variations.

CONCLUSION

The dose distribution calculated using the new CBCTc method showed excellent agreement with the dose calculated using dCT and pCT and was superior to the CBCTb method. The main reasons for deviations of the calculated dose distribution were caused by anatomical variations between the pCT and the corrected CBCT.