Radiation damage within nucleoprotein complexes studied by macromolecular X-ray crystallography

Identifying and avoiding radiation damage in macromolecular crystallography

Radiation damage remains one of the major impediments to accurate structure solution in macromolecular crystallography. The artefacts of radiation damage can manifest as structural changes that result in incorrect biological interpretations being drawn from a model, they can reduce the resolution to which data can be collected and they can even prevent structure solution entirely. In this article, we discuss how to identify and mitigate against the effects of radiation damage at each stage in the macromolecular crystal structure-solution pipeline.

Exploiting the full potential of cryo-EM maps

The Coulomb potential maps generated by electron microscopy (EM) experiments contain not only information about the position but also about the charge state of the atom. This feature of EM maps allows the identification of specific ions and the protonation state of amino acid side chains in the sample. Here, we summarize qualitative observations of charges in EM maps, discuss the difficulties in interpreting the charge in Coulomb potential maps with respect to distinguishing it from radiation damage, and outline considerations to implement the correct charge in fitting algorithms.

Radiation-damage investigation of a DNA 16-mer

In macromolecular crystallography, a great deal of effort has been invested in understanding radiation-damage progression. While the sensitivity of protein crystals has been well characterized, crystals of DNA and of DNA-protein complexes have not thus far been studied as thoroughly. Here, a systematic investigation of radiation damage to a crystal of a DNA 16-mer diffracting to 1.8 Å resolution and held at 100 K, up to an absorbed dose of 45 MGy, is reported. The RIDL (Radiation-Induced Density Loss) automated computational tool was used for electron-density analysis. Both the global and specific damage to the DNA crystal as a function of dose were monitored, following careful calibration of the X-ray flux and beam profile. The DNA crystal was found to be fairly radiation insensitive to both global and specific damage, with half of the initial diffraction intensity being lost at an absorbed average diffraction-weighted dose, D_1/2, of 19 MGy, compared with 9 MGy for chicken egg-white lysozyme crystals under the same beam conditions but at the higher resolution of 1.4 Å. The coefficient of sensitivity of the DNA crystal was 0.014 Ų MGy^-1, which is similar to that observed for proteins. These results imply that the significantly greater radiation hardness of DNA and RNA compared with protein observed in a DNA-protein complex and an RNA-protein complex could be due to scavenging action by the protein, thereby protecting the DNA and RNA in these studies. In terms of specific damage, the regions of DNA that were found to be sensitive were those associated with some of the bound calcium ions sequestered from the crystallization buffer. In contrast, moieties farther from these sites showed only small changes even at higher doses.

Electron Attachment to Microhydrated Deoxycytidine Monophosphate

DNA constituents are effectively decomposed via dissociative electron attachment (DEA). However, the DEA contribution to radiation damage in living tissues is a subject of ongoing discussion. We address an essential question, how aqueous environment influences the DEA to DNA. In particular, we report experimental fragmentation patterns for DEA to microhydrated 2-deoxycytidine 5-monophosphate (dCMP). Isolated dCMP was previously set as a model to describe mechanisms of DNA-strand breaks induced by secondary electrons and decomposes primarily by dissociation of the C-O phosphoester bond. We show that hydrated molecules decompose via dissociation of the C-N glycosidic bond followed by dissociation of the P-O bond. This significant change of the proposed mechanism can be interpreted by a reactive role of water in the postattachment dynamics. Comparison of the fragmentation with previous macroscopic irradiation studies suggests that the actual contribution of DEA to DNA radiation damage in living tissue is rather small.