Estimation of equivalent organ and effective doses to patients undergoing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention procedures using Monte Carlo simulation

Radiation exposure in augmented fluoroscopic bronchoscopy procedures: a comprehensive analysis for patients and physicians

Cancer is a major health challenge and causes millions of deaths worldwide each year, and the incidence of lung cancer has increased. Augmented fluoroscopic bronchoscopy (AFB) procedures, which combine bronchoscopy and fluoroscopy, are crucial for diagnosing and treating lung cancer. However, fluoroscopy exposes patients and physicians to radiation, and therefore, the procedure requires careful monitoring. The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement and the International Commission on Radiological Protection have emphasised the importance of monitoring patient doses and ensuring occupational radiation safety. The present study evaluated radiation doses during AFB procedures, focusing on patient skin doses, the effective dose, and the personal dose equivalent to the eye lens for physicians. Skin doses were measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. Peak skin doses were observed on the sides of the patients' arms, particularly on the side closest to the x-ray tube. Differences in the procedures and experience of physicians between the two hospitals involved in this study were investigated. AFB procedures were conducted more efficiently at Hospital A than at Hospital B, resulting in lower effective doses. Cone-beam computed tomography (CT) contributes significantly to patient effective doses because it has higher radiographic parameters. Despite their higher radiographic parameters, AFB procedures resulted in smaller skin doses than did image-guided interventional and CT fluoroscopy procedures. The effective doses differed between the two hospitals of this study due to workflow differences, with cone-beam CT playing a dominant role. No significant differences in left and right eyeHp(3) values were observed between the hospitals. For both hospitals, theHp(3) values were below the recommended limits, indicating that radiation monitoring may not be required for AFB procedures. This study provides insights into radiation exposure during AFB procedures, concerning radiation dosimetry, and safety for patients and physicians.

Gender based lung cancer risks for symptomatic coronary artery disease patients undergone cardiac CT

We estimate the lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of lung cancer incidence in symptomatic Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) patients receiving enhanced Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) and the unenhanced Computed Tomography Calcium Scoring (CTCS) examination. Retrospective analysis has been made of CCTA and CTCS data collected for 87 confirmed CAD adult patients. Patient effective dose (E) and organ doses (ODs) were calculated using CT-EXPO. Statistical correlation and the differences between E and ODs in enhanced CCTA and unenhanced CTCS were calculated using the Pearson coefficient and Wilcoxon unpaired t-test. Following BEIR VII report guidance, organ-specific LARs for the cohort were estimated using the organ-equivalent dose-to-risk conversion factor for numbers of cases per 100,000 patients exposed to low doses of 0.1 Gy. Significant statistical difference (p<0.0001) is found between E obtained for CTCS and that of CCTA. The scan length was found to be greater in CCTA (17.5 ± 2.9 cm) compared to that for CTCS (15 ± 2 cm). More elevated values of dose were noted for the esophagus (4.2 ± 2.15 mSv) and thymus (9.6 ± 2.54 mSv) for both CTCS and CCTA. CTCS organ doses were lower than that of CCTA. Per 100,000 patients, female cumulative doses are seen to give rise to greater lung cancer LARs compared to that for males, albeit with risk varying significantly, noticeably greater for females, younger patients and combined CCTA and CTCS scans. While scan parameters and tube-modulation methods clearly contribute to patient dose, mAs offers by far the greater contribution.

A systematic review of conversion factors between kerma-area product and effective/organ dose for cardiac interventional fluoroscopy procedures performed in adult and paediatric patients

The aim of this systematic review is to undertake a critical appraisal of the evidence in the published literature concerning the conversion factors between kerma-area product (P KA) and effective/organ dose (DCED_PKA, DCHT_PKA) for cardiac interventional fluoroscopy procedures performed in adults and paediatric patients and to propose reference conversion factors to help standardize dose calculations. A search strategy utilizing MeSH headings in three databases identified 59 (adult) and 37 (paediatric) papers deemed eligible for the review. Exclusion criteria were adopted to select data only from publications which established DCED_PKA in patients using the ICRP 103 tissue weighting factors. A time restriction from January 2007 was introduced in the search to capture the evolving trends of utilization of fluoroscopy-guided intervention technologies only in recent years. The suggested DCED_PKA and DCHT_PKA were synthesized by calculating the weighted averages of the values reported by the authors with weights corresponding to the study sample size. Eighteen studies for both adult (9) and paediatric (9) patients matching the search terms fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The suggested value for DCED_PKA in adult patients amounts to 0.24 mSv Gy−1cm−2. The suggested values for DCHT_PKA ranged from a minimum of 0.15 mSv Gy−1cm−2 for the female breast to a maximum of 0.97 mSv Gy−1cm−2 for the lungs. The suggested values for DCED_PKA in paediatric patients ranged from 3.45 mSv Gy−1cm−2 for the new-born to 0.49 mSv Gy−1cm−2 in the 15 years age class. The suggested values for DCHT_PKA ranged from a minimum of 0.33 mSv Gy−1cm−2 for bone marrow in the 15 years age class to a maximum of 11.49 mSv Gy−1cm−2 for the heart in the new-born. To conclude, values of DCED_PKA/DCHT_PKA were provided for calculating effective/organ doses in cardiac interventional procedures. They can be useful for standardizing dose calculations, hence for comparison of the radiation detriment from different imaging procedures and in the framework of epidemiologic studies.