Assessment of photon energy and dose rate dependence of U-NIPAM polymer gel dosimeter

The investigation of dose rate and photon beam energy dependence of optimized PASSAG polymer gel dosimeter using magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

It seems that dose rate (DR) and photon beam energy (PBE) may influence the sensitivity and response of polymer gel dosimeters. In the current project, the sensitivity and response dependence of optimized PASSAG gel dosimeter (OPGD) on DR and PBE were assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We fabricated the OPGD and the gel samples were irradiated with various DRs and PBEs. Then, the sensitivity and response (R2) of OPGD were obtained by MRI at various doses and post-irradiation times.

RESULTS

Our analysis showed that the sensitivity and response of OPGD are not affected by the evaluated DRs and PBEs. It was also found that the dose resolution values of OPGD ranged from 9 to 33 cGy and 12 to 34 cGy for the evaluated DRs and PBEs, respectively. Additionally, the data demonstrated that the sensitivity and response dependence of OPGD on DR and PBE do not vary over various times after the irradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this research project revealed that the sensitivity and response dependence of OPGD are independent of DR and PBE.

Recent Advances in Hydrogel-Based Sensors Responding to Ionizing Radiation

Ionizing radiation and its applications are widely spread throughout life. Similar to many other things, both the positive and negative aspects of ionizing radiation should always be kept in mind. For example, a proper radiation dose can be delivered to tumor tissue to kill malignant cells in radiotherapy. On the other hand, exceeding this dose can damage the normal tissues of a human organism. Therefore, the application of sensors for measuring ionizing radiation doses is of utmost importance in many fields, especially in cancer therapy. Traditional dosimeters, such as ionization chambers, silicon diodes and thermoluminescence dosimeters, are widely used. However, they have limitations in certain aspects. Hydrogel-based sensors (or dosimeters) for measuring ionizing radiation doses attract extensive attention for decades due to their equivalence to living tissue and biocompatibility. In this review, we catalog hydrogel-based dosimeters such as polymer, Fricke, radio-chromic, radio-fluorescence and NPs-embedded dosimeters. Most of them demonstrate desirable linear response and sensitivity regardless of energy and dose rate of ionizing radiation. We aim to review these dosimeters and their potential applications in radiotherapy as well as to stimulate a joint work of the experts from different fields such as materials science, chemistry, cancer therapy, radiobiology and nuclear science.

Hydrogels for Three-Dimensional Ionizing-Radiation Dosimetry

Radiation-sensitive gels are among the most recent and promising developments for radiation therapy (RT) dosimetry. RT dosimetry has the twofold goal of ensuring the quality of the treatment and the radiation protection of the patient. Benchmark dosimetry for acceptance testing and commissioning of RT systems is still based on ionization chambers. However, even the smallest chambers cannot resolve the steep dose gradients of up to 30-50% per mm generated with the most advanced techniques. While a multitude of systems based, e.g., on luminescence, silicon diodes and radiochromic materials have been developed, they do not allow the truly continuous 3D dose measurements offered by radiation-sensitive gels. The gels are tissue equivalent, so they also serve as phantoms, and their response is largely independent of radiation quality and dose rate. Some of them are infused with ferrous sulfate and rely on the radiation-induced oxidation of ferrous ions to ferric ions (Fricke-gels). Other formulations consist of monomers dispersed in a gelatinous medium (Polyacrylamide gels) and rely on radiation-induced polymerization, which creates a stable polymer structure. In both gel types, irradiation causes changes in proton relaxation rates that are proportional to locally absorbed dose and can be imaged using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Changes in color and/or opacification of the gels also occur upon irradiation, allowing the use of optical tomography techniques. In this work, we review both Fricke and polyacrylamide gels with emphasis on their chemical and physical properties and on their applications for radiation dosimetry.

Dosimetric evaluation of PASSAG-U polymer gel dosimeter: Dependence of dose rate and photon energy

OBJECTIVE

Several physical factors such as dose rate and photon energy may change response and sensitivity of polymer gel dosimeters. This study aims to evaluate the R2-dose response and sensitivity dependence of PASSAG-U gel dosimeters with 3% and 5% urea on dose rate and photon energy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PASSAG-U gel dosimeters were prepared under normal atmospheric conditions. The obtained gel dosimeters were irradiated to different dose rates (100, 200, and 300 cGy/min) and photon energies (6 and 15 MV). Finally, responses (R2) of the PASSAG-U gel dosimeters with 3% and 5% urea were analyzed by MRI technique at 1, 10, 14 days after the irradiation process.

RESULTS

The findings showed that the R2-dose responses of PASSAG-U gel dosimeters with 3% and 5% urea do not vary under the differently evaluated dose rates and photon energies. The R2-dose sensitivity of PASSAG-U polymer gel dosimeter with 3% urea does not change under the differently evaluated dose rates and photon energies, but it changes for PASSAG-U polymer gel dosimeter with 5% urea. The dose resolution values ranged from 0.20 to 0.86 Gy and from 0.27 to 2.20 Gy for the PASSAG-U gel dosimeter with 3% and 5% urea for the different dose rates and photon energies, respectively. Furthermore, it was revealed that the R2-dose response and sensitivity dependence of PASSAG-U gel dosimeters with 3% and 5% urea on dose rate and photon energy can vary over post irradiation time.

CONCLUSIONS

The study results demonstrated that dosimetric characteristics (dependence of dose rate and photon energy, and dose resolution) of PASSAG-U gel dosimeter with 3% were better than those of PASSAG-U gel dosimeter with 5% urea.