Baghani HR, Robatjazi M, Andreoli S. Comparing the dosimeter-specific corrections for influence quantities of some parallel-plate ionization chambers in conventional electron beam dosimetry.
Appl Radiat Isot 2021;
179:110031. [PMID:
34801928 DOI:
10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.110031]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Revised: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The performance characteristics of some widely employed parallel-plate ionization chambers in dosimetry of conventional high energy electron beams were evaluated and compared in the present study following the recommendations of the IAEA TRS-398 reference dosimetry protocol. Three different types of PTW-made parallel-plate ionization chambers including Roos (TM34001), Markus (TM23343), and Advanced Markus (TM34045) were employed, and correction factors for polarity (kpol), recombination (ks), and quality conversion factor ( [Formula: see text] ) were determined at different nominal electron energies of 4, 6, 9, 12, 16, and 20 MeV produced by a Varian Trilogy clinical Linac. All measurements were performed inside a MP3-M automatic water phantom in the reference condition of 100 cm SSD (source to surface distance), reference measurement depth (zref), and 10 × 10 cm2 field size at the phantom surface. The maximum and minimum range of kpol deviations from unity were respectively found for Markus and Roos ionization chambers. The maximum ks values also belonged to the Markus ionization chamber, while the minimum ks values were observed for the Advanced Markus chamber. The measured ks values through recommendations of the TRS-398 dosimetry protocol were in good accordance with those obtained by Jaffe-plot analysis for all considered ionization chambers. The type of employed ionization chamber can minimally affect the measured electron beam quality index (R50), while it can have a more considerable impact on [Formula: see text] value, especially in the case of the Markus chamber. From the results, it can be concluded that the Roos and Advanced Markus ionization chambers have a superior performance in the case of electron beam dosimetry, although all considered ionization chambers fulfilled the criteria requested by relevant reference dosimetry protocols.
Collapse