1
|
Bougie O, Randle E, Thurston J, Magee B, Warshafsky C, Rittenberg D. Directive clinique n o 447 : Diagnostic et prise en charge des polypes endométriaux. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2024; 46:102403. [PMID: 38331092 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
|
2
|
Bougie O, Randle E, Thurston J, Magee B, Warshafsky C, Rittenberg D. Guideline No. 447: Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Polyps. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2024; 46:102402. [PMID: 38325734 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide gynaecologists with an algorithm and evidence to guide the diagnosis and management of endometrial polyps. TARGET POPULATION All patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic endometrial polyps. OPTIONS Options for management of endometrial polyps include expectant, medical, and surgical management. These will depend on symptoms, risks for malignancy, and patient choice. OUTCOMES Outcomes include resolution of symptoms, histopathological diagnosis, and complete removal of the polyp. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS The implementation of this guideline aims to benefit patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic endometrial polyps and provide physicians with an evidence-based approach toward diagnosis and management (including expectant, medical, and surgical management) of polyps. EVIDENCE The following search terms were entered into PubMed/Medline and Cochrane: endometrial polyps, polyps, endometrial thickening, abnormal uterine bleeding, postmenopausal bleeding, endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial cancer, hormonal therapy, female infertility. All articles were included in the literature search up to 2021 and the following study types were included: randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, observational studies, and case reports. Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of these articles. Only English-language articles were reviewed. VALIDATION METHODS The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE Gynaecologists, family physicians, registered nurses, nurse practitioners, medical students, and residents and fellows. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Uterine polyps are common and can cause abnormal bleeding, infertility, or bleeding after menopause. If patients don't experience symptoms, treatment is often not necessary. Polyps can be treated with medication but often a surgery will be necessary. SUMMARY STATEMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS.
Collapse
|
3
|
Etrusco A, Buzzaccarini G, Laganà AS, Chiantera V, Vitale SG, Angioni S, D’Alterio MN, Nappi L, Sorrentino F, Vitagliano A, Difonzo T, Riemma G, Mereu L, Favilli A, Peitsidis P, D’Amato A. Use of Diode Laser in Hysteroscopy for the Management of Intrauterine Pathology: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:327. [PMID: 38337843 PMCID: PMC10855490 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14030327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Hysteroscopy currently represents the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine pathologies. Recent technological progress has enabled the integration of diagnostic and operative time, leading to the "see and treat" approach. Diode laser technology is emerging as one of the most innovative and intriguing techniques in this context. Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was carried out on the main databases. Only original studies reporting the treatment of intrauterine pathologies using diode laser were deemed eligible for inclusion in this systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023485452). Results: Eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis for a total of 474 patients undergoing laser hysteroscopic surgery. Eighty-three patients had female genital tract abnormalities, 63 had submucosal leiomyomas, 327 had endometrial polyps, and one patient had a scar pregnancy. Except for leiomyomas, whose technique already included two surgical times at the beginning, only seven patients required a second surgical step. Cumulative rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications of 2.7% and 0.6%, respectively, were reported. Conclusions: Diode laser through "see and treat" hysteroscopy appears to be a safe and effective method. However, additional studies with larger sample sizes and improved designs are needed to consolidate the evidence currently available in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Etrusco
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Paolo Giaccone” Hospital, 90127 Palermo, Italy;
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Buzzaccarini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Paolo Giaccone” Hospital, 90127 Palermo, Italy;
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy;
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Institute IRCCS Fondazione “G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Salvatore Giovanni Vitale
- Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (S.G.V.); (S.A.); (M.N.D.)
| | - Stefano Angioni
- Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (S.G.V.); (S.A.); (M.N.D.)
| | - Maurizio Nicola D’Alterio
- Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (S.G.V.); (S.A.); (M.N.D.)
| | - Luigi Nappi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy; (L.N.); (F.S.)
| | - Felice Sorrentino
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy; (L.N.); (F.S.)
| | - Amerigo Vitagliano
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Policlinico of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy; (A.V.); (T.D.); (A.D.)
| | - Tommaso Difonzo
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Policlinico of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy; (A.V.); (T.D.); (A.D.)
| | - Gaetano Riemma
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Liliana Mereu
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialism, University of Catania, P.O. “G. Rodolico”, Via Santa Sofia, 78, 95123 Catania, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Favilli
- Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06135 Perugia, Italy;
| | - Panagiotis Peitsidis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helena Venizelou Hospital, 11521 Athens, Greece;
| | - Antonio D’Amato
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Policlinico of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy; (A.V.); (T.D.); (A.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vitagliano A, Dellino M, Favilli A, D' Amato A, Nicolì P, Laganà AS, Noventa M, Bochicchio MA, Cicinelli E, Damiani GR. Patients' Use of Virtual Reality Technology for Pain Reduction during Outpatient Hysteroscopy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2023; 30:866-876. [PMID: 37648150 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.08.427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of virtual reality technology (VRT), as used by patients, for reducing pain during outpatient hysteroscopy. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases and clinical registers were searched until June 21, 2023. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO before the data extraction (CRD42023434340). METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION We included RCTs of patients receiving VRT compared with controls receiving routine care during outpatient hysteroscopy. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS The primary outcome was average pain during hysteroscopy. Pooled results were expressed as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Sources of heterogeneity were investigated through sensitivity and subgroups analysis. Five RCTs were included (435 participants). The comparison between the intervention and control groups showed a borderline difference in perceived pain during hysteroscopy (MD -0.88, 95% CI -1.77 to 0.01). Subgroup analysis based on the type of VRT (active or passive) indicated that active VRT potentially reduced the perception of pain (MD -1.42, 95% CI -2.21 to -0.62), whereas passive VRT had no effect (MD -0.06, 95% CI -1.15 to 1.03). CONCLUSION Patients' use of active VRT may be associated with a reduction in pain during outpatient hysteroscopy (evidence Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation 2/4). Future research should focus on conducting methodologically robust studies with larger sample sizes and more homogeneous populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amerigo Vitagliano
- 1st Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (Drs. Vitagliano, Dellino, D' Amato, Nicolì, Cicinelli, and Damiani), University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
| | - Miriam Dellino
- 1st Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (Drs. Vitagliano, Dellino, D' Amato, Nicolì, Cicinelli, and Damiani), University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Alessandro Favilli
- Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery (Drs. Favilli), University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Antonio D' Amato
- 1st Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (Drs. Vitagliano, Dellino, D' Amato, Nicolì, Cicinelli, and Damiani), University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Nicolì
- 1st Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (Drs. Vitagliano, Dellino, D' Amato, Nicolì, Cicinelli, and Damiani), University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE) (Dr. Laganà), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Marco Noventa
- Gynaecologic and Obstetrics Clinic, Department of Women's and Children's Health (Dr. Noventa), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Ettore Cicinelli
- 1st Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (Drs. Vitagliano, Dellino, D' Amato, Nicolì, Cicinelli, and Damiani), University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Gianluca Raffaello Damiani
- 1st Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (Drs. Vitagliano, Dellino, D' Amato, Nicolì, Cicinelli, and Damiani), University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kalra K, Jain S, Rajaram S, Gupta B, Singla A. A novel technique of vagino-hysteroscopy using alginate gel interface: A proof of concept study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023. [PMID: 36728581 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the feasibility of vagino-hysteroscopy using alginate gel Interface (VAGI) with conventional vaginoscopic hysteroscopy (CVH). METHODS Thirty women undergoing diagnostic vagino-hysteroscopy were randomly allocated into Group I (VAGI): Alginate occluder was used at introitus to facilitate hydrodistension during hysteroscopy; or Group II: Underwent no-touch hysteroscopy. Primary outcome was feasibility, defined as successful visualization of uterine cavity. Secondary outcomes included operative time, hydrostatic pressures for optimum visualization, pain experienced by patient on visual analog scale, maneuverability and surgeon satisfaction. Data analysis was performed using χ2 and Fisher exact tests for qualitative variables and Student t test for quantitative variables. RESULTS VAGI was significantly better than CVH (80% vs. 33.3%; relative risk 8, P = 0.025). With VAGI, optimum visualization was achieved at significantly lower pressures at all levels (vagina, P = 0.034; cervix, P = 0.01; uterus, P < 0.001), in less time (P = 0.007), and using less irrigation fluid (P < 0.001). Surgeon satisfaction was significantly higher for VAGI (P = 0.009). Subgroup analysis showed higher likelihood of success of VAGI in women who were premenopausal (P = 0.015), younger than 45 years (P = 0.024), and had a history of vaginal birth (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS VAGI is quicker to perform and provides optimum visualization at much lower pressures than CVH. Use of alginate is patient friendly and yields higher surgeon satisfaction rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanika Kalra
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCMS >BH, Delhi, India
| | - Sandhya Jain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCMS >BH, Delhi, India
| | - Shalini Rajaram
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCMS >BH, Delhi, India
| | - Bindiya Gupta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCMS >BH, Delhi, India
| | - Anshuja Singla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCMS >BH, Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dreessen JRJ, van der Meulen JF, Bongers MY, Mol BWJ, Langenveld J. Publication trends and usefulness of research in hysteroscopic myomectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding: A review of the published literature. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 161:692-701. [PMID: 36495222 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Despite the amount of research into hysteroscopic myomectomy, questions about the optimal treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding remain. This study reviewed publication trends on this topic from 2002 to 2019 and assessed the usefulness of studies. A total of 580 articles were published on PubMed in this time frame, in 15 different languages. There were meta-analyses (1.6%), systematic reviews (12%), and randomized controlled trials (4.2%). Twelve percent were published in high impact factor journals. After applying our selection criteria, the usefulness of 37 articles was assessed: one article scored high, 31 scored moderate, and five scored low. The costs of these studies were estimated at US$ 971 700.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janique R J Dreessen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Julia F van der Meulen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.,Grow School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, MUMC, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies Y Bongers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.,Grow School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, MUMC, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ben W J Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Josje Langenveld
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Office Operative Hysteroscopy for the Management of Retained Products of Conception. Reprod Sci 2022; 29:761-767. [PMID: 35020188 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-022-00849-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare office to conventional operative hysteroscopy for the treatment of retained products of conception (RPOC). This retrospective cohort study included all women who underwent hysteroscopy due to RPOC between January 2018 and December 2019, in a single tertiary medical care center. Exclusion criteria for hysteroscopy included the following: (1) proximity to delivery (up to 3 weeks); (2) hemodynamic instability; (3) active massive bleeding; and (4) genital tract infection. See-and-treat hysteroscopy (study group) outcomes were compared to operative hysteroscopy (controls). Data were collected from women's medical records. Primary outcome was defined as successful removal of all suspected RPOC with no need for additional intervention. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. During the study period, 222 women underwent hysteroscopy due to RPOC. Of them, 138 (62%) and 84 (38%) underwent see-and-treat and operative hysteroscopy, respectively. Symptomatic women were more commonly referred to operative hysteroscopy (60 (71%) vs. 54 (39%); p = 0.001). Maximal diameter of the suspected finding was smaller both by ultrasound examination (13 (10-18) vs. 18 (13-32) mm; p = 0.001) and by surgeon estimation during diagnostic hysteroscopy (12 (8-20) vs. 20 (14-30) mm; p = 0.001), in the see-and-treat compared to the operative hysteroscopy group, respectively. While comparing success rate between groups, no difference was observed. Sub-analysis by the maximal diameter of RPOC findings revealed that see-and-treat success rate is reduced as the RPOC is larger. Success rate was high and comparable to operative hysteroscopy for findings ≤ 2 cm (102/117 (87%) vs. 49/54 (91%); p = 0.79). Nevertheless, for RPOC > 2 cm, success was significantly more frequent in the operative hysteroscopy group (28/30 (93%) vs. 9/16 (57%); p = 0.002). This finding was supported by logistic regression analysis that found maximal diameter of RPOC as the only parameter associated with success rate (B = 0.96; p = 0.03). Office operative hysteroscopy is a feasible treatment option for the removal of RPOC when maximal diameter is taken under consideration due to its association to success rate.Clinical trial registration: The study protocol was approved by the "Sheba Medical Center" Review Board (ID 5200-18 SMC) on June 24, 2018.
Collapse
|
8
|
Giampaolino P, Della Corte L, Di Filippo C, Mercorio A, Vitale SG, Bifulco G. Office hysteroscopy in the management of women with postmenopausal bleeding. Climacteric 2020; 23:369-375. [PMID: 32368939 DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2020.1754389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) is a relevant aspect for health-care providers in clinical practice: the first objective is to rule out potential gynecological cancer. The purpose of this narrative review is to evaluate the role of office hysteroscopy in the management of PMB. Office hysteroscopy is a minimally invasive procedure allowing direct visualization of uterine pathology without the need for general anesthesia and the use of an operating room, generating cost savings and greater compliance among patients. Here, we focus on major intrauterine diseases (polyps, submucosal myomas, endometrial hyperplasia, and cancer) as causes of PMB. Office hysteroscopy appears to be safe and feasible, and could allow accurate diagnosis of intrauterine pathologies, especially that with a focal growth pattern, otherwise misdiagnosed with blinded procedures. However, studies focusing exclusively on postmenopausal women are still few, so further research, especially randomized controlled trials, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Giampaolino
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - L Della Corte
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - C Di Filippo
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - A Mercorio
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - S G Vitale
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - G Bifulco
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bennett A, Lepage C, Thavorn K, Fergusson D, Murnaghan O, Coyle D, Singh SS. Effectiveness of Outpatient Versus Operating Room Hysteroscopy for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Uterine Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2019; 41:930-941. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
10
|
Is outpatient hysteroscopy accurate for the diagnosis of endometrial pathology among perimenopausal and postmenopausal women? Menopause 2019; 25:160-164. [PMID: 28763396 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0000000000000961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the histological and visual accuracy of outpatient hysteroscopy. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of all women referred to a tertiary center outpatient hysteroscopy clinic between March 2011 and October 2016 for the following indications: postmenopausal bleeding, suspected polyp, and/or thick endometrium. Histological accuracy was evaluated by comparing specimens obtained in hysteroscopy with those obtained by hysterectomy, and visual accuracy was evaluated by comparing visual findings with those obtained by biopsies. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratio were calculated to assess visual accuracy. RESULTS The mean age of participants was 54.14 (interquartile range 43.0-64.0). A total of 408 pathological specimens were obtained from outpatient hysteroscopies during the 712 visits recorded in the clinic log. Histological accuracy was evaluated in 15 participants who eventually underwent hysterectomy. Total percent of agreement between hysteroscopy biopsies and final pathology obtained by hysterectomy was 73% (kappa = 0.47). Overall visual accuracy was calculated with a 93.1% sensitivity, 52.1% specificity, 90.4% positive predictive value, and 61.0% negative predictive value. Visual accuracy for benign pathology was generally higher compared with that for pre and malignant lesions. Visual accuracy was satisfactory for the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma with sensitivity and specificity of 71.4% and 98.9%, respectively, but poor for diagnosing hyperplasia with sensitivity and specificity of 25.0% and 96.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Outpatient hysteroscopy is an adequate and reliable tool for the evaluation of benign pathology in the uterine cavity. Visual findings may not suffice, and directed biopsies may be required to improve diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
|
11
|
Pennant ME, Mehta R, Moody P, Hackett G, Prentice A, Sharp SJ, Lakshman R. Premenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding and risk of endometrial cancer. BJOG 2017; 124:404-411. [PMID: 27766759 PMCID: PMC5297977 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometrial biopsies are undertaken in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding but the risk of endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia is unclear. OBJECTIVES To conduct a systematic literature review to establish the risk of endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. SEARCH STRATEGY Search of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library from database inception to August 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA Studies reporting rates of endometrial cancer and/or atypical hyperplasia in women with premenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Data were independently extracted by two reviewers and cross-checked. For each outcome, the risk and a 95% CI were estimated using logistic regression with robust standard errors to account for clustering by study. MAIN RESULTS Sixty-five articles contributed to the analysis. Risk of endometrial cancer was 0.33% (95% CI 0.23-0.48%, n = 29 059; 97 cases) and risk of endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia was 1.31% (95% CI 0.96-1.80, n = 15 772; 207 cases). Risk of endometrial cancer was lower in women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) (0.11%, 95% CI 0.04-0.32%, n = 8352; 9 cases) compared with inter-menstrual bleeding (IMB) (0.52%, 95% CI 0.23-1.16%, n = 3109; 14 cases). Of five studies reporting the rate of atypical hyperplasia in women with HMB, none identified any cases. CONCLUSIONS The risk of endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding is low. Premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding should first undergo conventional medical management. Where this fails, the presence of IMB and older age may be indicators for further investigation. Further research into the risks associated with age and the cumulative risk of co-morbidities is needed. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Contrary to practice, premenopausal women with heavy periods or inter-menstrual bleeding rarely require biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ME Pennant
- Public Health DirectorateCambridgeshire County CouncilCambridgeUK
| | - R Mehta
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation trustCambridgeUK
| | - P Moody
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation trustCambridgeUK
| | - G Hackett
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation trustCambridgeUK
| | - A Prentice
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation trustCambridgeUK
- Department of Obstetrics & GynaecologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - SJ Sharp
- Medical Research Council Epidemiology UnitUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - R Lakshman
- Public Health DirectorateCambridgeshire County CouncilCambridgeUK
- Medical Research Council Epidemiology UnitUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Al Chami A, Saridogan E. Endometrial Polyps and Subfertility. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2016; 67:9-14. [PMID: 28242961 DOI: 10.1007/s13224-016-0929-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2016] [Accepted: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial polyps are frequently seen in subfertile women, and there is some evidence suggesting a detrimental effect on fertility. How polyps contribute to subfertility and pregnancy loss is uncertain and possible mechanisms are poorly understood. It may be related to mechanical interference with sperm transport, embryo implantation or through intrauterine inflammation or altered production of endometrial receptivity factors. Different diagnostic modalities such as two- or three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound, saline infusion sonography or hysteroscopy are commonly used to evaluate endometrial polyps with good detection rates. The approach of clinicians towards polyps detected during infertility investigations is not clearly known, and it is quite likely that there is wide variation amongst different groups. Most clinicians suggest hysteroscopy and polyp removal if a polyp is suspected before stimulation for in vitro fertilisation or a frozen embryo transfer cycle. However, the clinical evidence and benefit of different management options during assisted reproduction technology cycles are conflicting. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend one particular option over others when a polyp is suspected during stimulation for in vitro fertilisation. A properly designed randomized controlled trial is needed to determine the best treatment option. In this article, we present the available evidence and our practice related to different diagnostic modalities and management options. We also discuss the available literature relevant to the management of endometrial polyps in relation to natural conception, intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Al Chami
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Women's Health Division, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Ertan Saridogan
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Women's Health Division, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
|
14
|
Saridogan E, Deguara CS. Office Hysteroscopic Treatment of Uterine Fibroids. CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s13669-016-0152-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
15
|
Dealberti D, Riboni F, Cosma S, Pisani C, Montella F, Saitta S, Calagna G, Di Spiezio Sardo A. Feasibility and Acceptability of Office-Based Polypectomy With a 16F Mini-Resectoscope: A Multicenter Clinical Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016; 23:418-24. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2015] [Revised: 12/30/2015] [Accepted: 12/31/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
16
|
Kolhe S. Setting up of ambulatory hysteroscopy service. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 29:966-81. [PMID: 25979350 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2015] [Accepted: 03/18/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
There is an obvious trend towards developing ambulatory procedures in gynaecology with ambulatory hysteroscopy as its mainstay. In the recent years, the fast pace of modern technological advances in gynaecologic endoscopy, and particularly in the field of hysteroscopy, have been both thrilling and spectacular. Despite this, the uptake of operative hysteroscopy in ambulatory settings has been relatively slow. There is some apprehension amongst gynaecologists to embark on therapeutic outpatient hysteroscopy, and an organisational change is required to alter the mindset. Although there are best practice guidelines for outpatient hysteroscopy, there are unresolved issues around adequate training and accreditation of future hysteroscopists. Virtual-reality simulation training for operative hysteroscopy has shown promising preliminary results, and it is being aggressively evaluated and validated. This review article is an attempt to provide a useful practical guide to all those who wish to implement ambulatory hysteroscopy services in their outpatient departments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilpa Kolhe
- Royal Derby Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Level 2, Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby DE22 3NE, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
[Intra uterine devices removal during office hysteroscopy: About 36 cases]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014; 44:653-7. [PMID: 25304096 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2014.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2014] [Revised: 09/04/2014] [Accepted: 09/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess effectiveness and patient tolerance of office hysteroscopy performed for the removal of intra-uterine devices (IUDs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Single center, retrospective study from May 2005 to June 2012. Analysis of the office hysteroscopy database only retrieving data concerning IUD removals: 36 hysteroscopies were performed for IUD removal with mean age of 40±7 years old (20-51), mean parity of 2.1±1.09 (0-5), and mean gestity of 2.5±1.14 (0-5). The indication was failure of IUD removal in an office setting, mostly because of non-visible sutures (33 cases, 91.6%), in 3 cases owing to broken sutures (8.4%). We performed then an office hysteroscopy using a 5.5mm hysteroscope. Either sutures or the IUD itself were grasped, then removed under visual control. Main end point was technique effectiveness, namely success or failure of IUD removal. Secondary end point equals to patient tolerance. RESULTS We included 36 patients. IUD removal was effective in 34 out of 36 cases (94.4% success rate). Patient tolerance was rated good for 12 patients (52%), acceptable for 10 (44%), poor for one (4%) and a vasovagal episode occurred in 3% of cases. CONCLUSION Office hysteroscopy performed to remove IUDs difficult to extract is an effective method, generally achieving good patient tolerance and reduced morbidity.
Collapse
|
18
|
Gambadauro P, Martínez-Maestre MA, Torrejón R. When is see-and-treat hysteroscopic polypectomy successful? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 178:70-3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2013] [Revised: 03/05/2014] [Accepted: 03/07/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
19
|
Hysteroscopy: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 178:114-22. [PMID: 24835861 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2014] [Revised: 04/18/2014] [Accepted: 04/22/2014] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to provide guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (CNGOF), based on the best evidence available, concerning hysteroscopy. Vaginoscopy should be the standard technique for diagnostic hysteroscopy (Grade A) using a miniature (≤3.5mm sheath) (Grade A) rigid hysteroscope (Grade C), using normal saline solution distension medium (Grade C), without any anaesthesia (conscious sedation should not be routinely used), without cervical preparation (Grade B), without vaginal disinfection and without antibiotic prophylaxy (Grade B). Misoprostol (Grade A), vaginal oestrogens (Grade C), or GnRH agonist routine administration is not recommended before operative hysteroscopy. Before performing hysteroscopy, it is important to purge the air out of the system (Grade A). The uterine cavity distention pressure should be maintained below the mean arterial pressure and below 120mm Hg. The maximum fluid deficit of 2000ml is suggested when using normal saline solution and 1000ml is suggested when using hypotonic solution. When uterine perforation is recognized during operative hysteroscopy using monopolar or bipolar loop, the procedure should be stopped and a laparoscopy should be performed in order to eliminate a bowel injury. Diagnostic or operative hysteroscopy is allowed when an endometrial cancer is suspected (Grade B). Implementation of this guideline should decrease the prevalence of complications related to hysteroscopy.
Collapse
|
20
|
[Prevention of the complications related to hysteroscopy: guidelines for clinical practice]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 42:1032-49. [PMID: 24210234 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) from the French college of obstetrics and gynecology (CNGOF), based on the best evidence available, concerning the adverse events related to hysteroscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Review of literature using following Keywords: hysteroscopy; vaginoscopy; infection; perforation; intrauterine adhesions RESULTS Vaginoscopy should be the standard technique for outpatient hysteroscopy (grade A) using a miniature (≤ 3.5mm sheath) (grade A) rigid hysteroscope (grade C), using normal saline solution distension medium (grade C), without any anesthesia (conscious sedation should not be routinely used), without cervical preparation (grade B), without vaginal disinfection and without antibiotic prophylaxy (grade B). Misoprostol (grade A), vaginal estrogens (grade C), or GnRH agonist routine administration is not recommended before operative hysteroscopy. Before performing hysteroscopy, it is important to purge the air out of the system (grade A). The uterine cavity distention pressure should be maintained below the mean arterial pressure and below 120 mmHg. The maximum fluid deficit of 2000 mL is suggested when using normal saline solution and 1000 mL is suggested when using hypotonic solution. When uterine perforation is recognized during operative hysteroscopy using monopolar or bipolar loop, the procedure should be stopped and a laparoscopy should be performed in order to eliminate a bowel injury. Diagnostic or operative hysteroscopy is allowed when an endometrial cancer is suspected (grade B). CONCLUSION Implementation of this guideline should decrease the prevalence of complications related to office and operative hysteroscopy.
Collapse
|
21
|
Optimum uterine filling pressure for outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 28:86-91. [PMID: 24262433 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2013] [Revised: 07/27/2013] [Accepted: 07/31/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
This study designed a double-blind, randomized controlled trial to assess whether adequate visibility can be achieved with lower uterine filling pressures using normal saline for diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy and whether patient discomfort can be reduced. A total of 234 patients were randomized to 40 mmHg (77 patients), 70 mmHg (78 patients) or 100 mmHg (79 patients) of uterine filling pressures. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of procedures where adequate visibility was achieved during diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy. The secondary outcome was the level of pain experienced by the patient as assessed using a visual analogue scale. There was adequate visibility in 87.0% of cases in 40 mmHg group, 94.9% in 70 mmHg group and 97.5% in 100 mmHg group. Visibility was lower with 40 mmHg compared with 70 and 100 mmHg (P < 0.05). The mean pain score in each group was not significantly different. In conclusion, this study showed that there was a higher trend towards inadequate visibility with lower filling pressures. Pressures of 70 and 100 mmHg may be equivalent to each other but not to a pressure level of 40 mmHg. Pain scores do not differ significantly with the pressure options used.
Collapse
|
22
|
Manchanda R, Saridogan E, Abdelraheim A, Johnson M, Rosenthal AN, Benjamin E, Brunell C, Side L, Gessler S, Jacobs I, Menon U. Annual outpatient hysteroscopy and endometrial sampling (OHES) in HNPCC/Lynch syndrome (LS). Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 286:1555-62. [PMID: 22865035 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2492-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2012] [Accepted: 07/19/2012] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND LS women have a 40-60% lifetime risk of endometrial cancer (EC). Most international guidelines recommend screening. However, data on efficacy are limited. PURPOSE To assess the performance of OHES for EC screening in LS and compare it with transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) alone. METHODS A prospective observational cohort study of LS women attending a tertiary high-risk familial gynaecological cancer clinic was conducted. LS women opting for EC screening underwent annual OHES and TVS. Histopathological specimens were processed using a strict protocol. Data of women screened between October 2007 and March 2010 were analysed from a bespoke database. Histology was used as the gold standard. Diagnostic accuracy of OHES was compared with TVS using specificity, and positive (PLR) and negative (NLR) likelihood ratios. RESULTS Forty-one LS women underwent 69 screens (41 prevalent, 28 incident). Four (three prevalent, one incident) women were detected to have EC/atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH), five had endometrial polyps and two had endometrial hyperplasia (EH) on OHES. TVS detected two of four EC/AEH. OHES had similar specificity of 89.8% (CI 79.2, 96.2%), but higher PLR 9.8 (CI 4.6, 21) and lower NLR (zero) compared to TVS: specificity 84.75%(CI 73, 92.8%), PLR 3.28 (CI 1.04, 10.35) and NLR 0.59 (CI 0.22, 1.58). No interval cancers occurred over a median follow-up of 22 months. The annual incidence was 3.57% (CI 0.09, 18.35) for EC, 10.71% (CI 2.27, 28.23) for polyps and 21.4% (CI 8.3, 40.1) for any endometrial pathology. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that in LS, annual OHES is acceptable and has high diagnostic accuracy for EC/AEH screening. Larger international studies are needed for confirmation, given the relatively small numbers of LS women at individual centres. It reinforces the current recommendation that endometrial sampling is crucial when screening these women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjit Manchanda
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, EGA Institute for Women's Health, Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, University College London, and Department of Gynaecology, University College London Hospital, First floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|